[Striga Gesnerioides (Wild.) Vatke] RESISTANCE USING MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION in NIGER By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh BREEDING COWPEA [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] FOR STRIGA [Striga gesnerioides (Wild.) Vatke] RESISTANCE USING MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION IN NIGER By SALIFOU MAHAMADOU (10359704) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE IN PLANT BREEDING WEST AFRICA CENTRE FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT COLLEGE OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF GHANA LEGON DECEMBER, 2015 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ABSTRACT Striga gesnerioides (Wild.)Vatke is one of the main biotic constraints restricting yield of cowpea in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in general and particularly in Niger. The available resistant varieties developed so far often lack farmers‟ and end-users‟ desired traits and they also show levels of breakdown in resistance. Understanding farmers‟ knowledge regarding production constraints and varietal preferences is invaluable in breeding for cowpea improvement. The development of cowpea varieties by introgressing multiple Striga resistance into adapted genotypes will facilitate the achievement of food security in the country. This study aims to (i) assess farmers‟ preferred traits and perceptions of Striga on cowpea production (ii) identify new sources of Striga resistance in national and other available germplasm (iii) determine the presence of other Striga races besides SG3 in Niger (iv) introgress the resistance gene „Rsg1’ into farmers‟ preferred varieties using marker assisted selection (MAS) (v) assess MAS for selection of Striga resistant genotypes. A participatory rural appraisal technique was used to identify the importance of cowpea in the farming system and its production constraints as well as farmers‟ knowledge on Striga and their cowpea preferred traits. Farmers ranked cowpea as the second most important crop after millet in Niger. Cowpea was grown for both food (56 %) and cash (44 %). The most important variety selection criteria used by farmers were high yielding potential, early maturity, white-colored grain and good taste. The major constraints to production were insects, Striga, drought and low soil fertility. Farmers had good knowledge on Striga and their preferred grain characteristics were large size and white seeded cowpea varieties. ii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Eighty cowpea genotypes were screened to evaluate their response to natural Striga infestation in the field. There was significant variation in the resistance of cowpea lines to Striga. The cowpea lines IT93K-693-2, IT99K-573-1-1 and IT98K-205-8 were free of Striga emerged shoots m-2, while the lines 2491-171, 2472-154 and Suvita-2 supported only 0.43 to 0.87 Striga shoots m-2. The other lines supported higher numbers ranging from 3.52 to 9.13 of emerged Striga shoots m-2. Striga infestation resulted in 66% and 79% of yield losses of the susceptible genotypes as compared to the resistant and tolerant lines respectively. The screening did not reveal new sources of Striga resistance; however, the varieties IT93K-693-2, IT99K-573-1-1 and IT98K- 205-8 were confirmed as potential sources of resistance and good donor parents to incorporate Striga resistance into well adapted genotypes. The cultivars B2/16/2378, B1/18/2542 and B1/12/2525-234 were tolerant to Striga with a significant yield potential compared to that of the resistant and the susceptible lines. Therefore, they could be used as donor parents in breeding cowpea for yield improvement in Niger. Field and pot experiments were conducted during years 2013 and 2014 in order to identify the different Striga races that infest cowpea in Niger. Fifteen genotypes were screened under natural infestation as well as inoculated with three samples of the parasitic weed collected in three hot spot regions in Niger. The test revealed Striga attack on three multiracial Striga resistant varieties, B301, IT97K-499-35 and IT98K- 205-8 suggesting the presence of other races other than SG3 in the studied area; or the breakdown of the resistance to Striga race SG3 in these cowpea varieties. Also, the resistance of varieties HTR and Suvita 2 observed, respectively in the field at Kollo and in pots with a sample of inoculum from Magaria suggested the prevalence of iii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Striga race SG1 in these sites. The geographical distribution of Striga races needs to be clarified in Niger. Marker assisted selection with backcross breeding was used to transfer „Rsg1’ Striga resistance gene from the breeding line IT93K-693- 2 into three farmers‟ preferred varieties, IT90K-372-1-2, KVx30-309-6G and TN5-78. The microsatellite marker SSR1 was used to track and introgress the resistance gene Rsg1 into the varieties IT90K-372-1-2 and TN5-78. The marker which produced a single band in resistant lines and amplified a 150 bp fragment was validated with the parents and the subsequent F1, F2 and BC1F1 populations. Ten promising lines with the resistance marker were selected in BC2F3, BC3F3 and F6 populations derived from the crosses IT90K-372-1-2 x IT93K-693-2 and TN5-78 x IT93K-693-2. Further evaluations and improvement of these genotypes will accelerate the release of varieties combining farmers‟ preferred traits with stable resistance to Striga. iv University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises and glory be to ALMIGHTY ALLAH who has made the completion of this work possible for me. I am grateful to the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) who provided funds for this study. I am indebted to the West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement (WACCI) for giving me an excellent training in Plant Breeding. Special thanks to WACCI Director, Professor. Eric Y. Danquah, the lecturers and the administration staff of WACCI for the facilitation. I would like to thank my supervisory committee composed of Professor Pangirayi Tongoona, Professor Samuel Offei and Professor Kwadwo Offori for their guidance in this research. I am indebted to my In-country supervisor Doctor Jean Baptiste De La Salle Tignegre for his advises and experience that guided me to the success of this work. I also acknowledge his support and facilitation for the genotyping conducted at INERA, Burkina Faso (Laboratoire de Biotechnologies Végétales de Kamboinsé). I hereby thank INERA staff, particularly the technicians Léandre Poda and Serge Zida who helped me in the genotyping. My sincere gratitude to INRAN, my institution for the facilities during my field research and to my technicians namely Illia Habou, Tassiou Moussa, Ousmane v University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Adamou, Garba Ali (Maradi station), Mahamadou Bizo (Kollo station) and Siradji Moumouni (Magaria station) for their assistance in field works. A part of germplasm used in this study was introduced from INERA in Burkina Faso and IITA Kano; these institutions are sincerely acknowledged. I thank all those who are not named here but contributed directly or indirectly to the success of this work. Finally I am deeply indebted to my Family, especially my wife and my children for their support and patience during my absence. vi University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................. i ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ v TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. vii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... xv LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ...................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................ 8 2.0 Literature review ....................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Cowpea ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Origin and taxonomy .......................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Reproductive biology ......................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Crossing or artificial hybridization techniques ................................................ 10 2.1.4 Cultivation, production and utilization............................................................. 11 2.1.5 Farmer preferred traits ...................................................................................... 13 2.2 Striga gesnerioides.................................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Taxonomy and geographical distribution ......................................................... 14 2.2.2 Host species and damage to crops .................................................................... 15 2.2.3 Life cycle of