Rhodesian Rumpus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rhodesian Rumpus Rhodesian Rumpus (From Our London Correspondent) With the announcement of the details of the proposed new Constitution for Northern Rhodesia, one can be forgiven for being a little surprised at what all the fuss has been about. This is no revolutionary move forward guaranteeing the Africans a majority say in the country. It is certainly not the one man one vote Constitution for which the Africans have been campaigning, nor is it even as pro-African as Macleod's original proposal announced in February 1961, which was subsequently abandoned, mainly as a result of pressure from Sir Roy Welensky, The best that can be said about the new Con. stitution is that it is a slight improvement on the June 1961 proposals. Certainty Mr Kaunda is entitled to feel that the new deal is not as favourable as the one he thought he bad got in February 1961; it has certainly not given back the African nationalists any tiling like all the electoral advantages taken from them in June 1901. In February 1961 a good chance existed that African nationalists in coalition with white liberals, might win most of the middle 15 seats, and thus a legislative majority. ALTHOUGH the actual arithmetical lify for a seat has been abolished opposition to condemn this speech details of the new proposals are and the qualification of 12½ per as treasonable were defeated, there somewhat complicated, they can he cent is reduced to 10 per cent. This is no doubt that Sir Roy's supporters summarized briefly as follows. The means that a United Federal Party in the Conservative party have main changes of the present pro­ candidate ( Sir Roy Welensky's dwindled. posals affect only 15 of the 45 seats group) who before had to win only in the Assembly. The February 100 African votes, will now have to Two examples will serve to illust­ 1961 constitution extended the get near to 1.000 votes. (In 1959 Sir rate the change in the Conservative faanchise to give more Africans the Roy Welensky's party attracted only party which rallied so violently to Sir Roy's defence against the Mac- vote and proposed a three-tier assem­ 5½ per cent of the African voters). leod February 1901 constitution. bly—a legislature of 15 members African candidates have now had It has taken a lot of time and trou­ with 15 seats to be elected by an their percentage of qualifying Euro­ ble to muster up support for a Upper Roll of voters (dominated by pean votes reduced by 24 per cent. mild resolution defending federation the Europeans). 15 on a Lower Holl The most likely results that will (spelt this time with a small "I") (mainly African and Asian), 7 casue from this Constitution are as a vague concept instead of a double-member national constituen­ either the establishment of a res­ political entity which already exists. cies containing both Rolls and one pectable Government which repre­ Many of the 85 signatories of the Asian and coloured scat. In four of sents no-one. or a series of invalid original anti-Macleod motion were the national seats, one of the suc­ elections. The farts of the situation not prepared to sign even this mild­ cessful candidates had to be a Euro- must be faced that under this new ly worded resolution, and finally pean and the other an African. The Constitution there is only a remote only 10 were prepared to put their other three double-member seats possibility for an African majority, names down to this watered-down were to have no such limitations- for it will be almost as difficult to version of the Tory revolt. It is for the third group, every member get 10 per cent of the white settlers true that an amendment to this had to qualify by obtaining a mini­ to vote for genuine representatives motion has been tabled, demanding mum which was then unstated- of the African Liberation Move­ support for the Central African percentage of votes from both the ment as to get 12½ per cent. In actual fact, there is very little in Federation. but so far. only four Upper and Lower Rolls. members — Anthony Fell. Paul In the June Constitution, influ­ these new proposals to enrage the while settlers, and cynics are asking Williams. Donald Johnson and enced by Sir Roy Welensky's threats, Captain Henry kerby have the balance was once more tilted in whether Sir Roy's dramatic trip to signed it. Further evidence of the fax our of the European settlers. To London was not actually made to change can he seen in the speech qualify for election, a national can­ pre-dispose Mr Kaunda in favour of accepting the new proposals! made at the Primrose League by Mr didate would have to get 12½ per Humphrey Barclay. where he said, cent of both the African and Euro­ More interesting, however, is the giving in to Welensky would be like pcan poll or 400 votes, whichever British Government's and Conserva­ "handing over Algeria to the French was less. This was clearly a white- tive party's reaction to Sir Roy's colons". leaning scheme, since the degree of visit. Here there is a perceptible support that an African candidate change in the position as compared Federation : Crux of Problem would normally have to get from with last year. The delicacy of this However, it is not the details of the European voters would be one ex-railway worker's appearance, the new Northern Khodesian Consti­ in eight while a European appeal­ matched only by the delicacy of his tution, but the future of the Central ing to African voters would need language at London airport when African Federation and the 225.000 only about one vote in 25. he threatened to "go the whole whit inhabitants of Southern Rho­ The New Proposals hog" and use force if necessary did desia that really provides the crux In the new proposals the numeri­ not create a favourable impression; of the problem. It is this that cal alternative of 400 votes to qua­ although attempts by the Labour really brought Sir Roy to London. 515 March 24, 1962 The Central African federation pared to do so at the cost of Sou­ if necessary. Perhaps the example was brought into existence in 1953 thern Rhodesia's independence. The of the ruthless methods used by the and is made up of three very diffe­ British Conservative party now South African Government makes rent units. The latest population appears to be less divided on the him believe that similar measures figures show that there are 225,000 issue of Federation, and to be re­ can be employed to keep down the Europeans in Southern Rhodesia as conciled, regretfully to the inevit­ Africans in the Federation. Sir against 2.87 million Africans. In able. Roy at present is quite unwilling to Northern Rhodesia. there are give an inch, and as he has already 77,000 Europeans and 2.37 million As far as the while settlers, as plainly stated, will have no com­ Africans. Southern Rhodesia is a represented by Sir Roy Welensky, punction in using force. That the self-governing colony with a Prime are concerned, large parts of the use of force is a serious threat Minister. Here, the European set­ present federation are valueless, must be accepted by all political tlers have been in complete charge these include Nyasaland and the realists who admit that they set a of internal affairs since 1923, So Northern Province of Northern limit to British action in the Fede­ far, there have been no African Rhodesia, but the core of the Fede­ ration. members of its law-making body, ral wealth is the copper belt of Unless there is a change in policy, and only a few thousand Africans Northern Rhodesia and this they the Central African Federation is have been eligible to vote. Northern will not part with without a light. doomed. As the Monckton Com­ Rhodesia and Nyasaland. on the As the French have hung on in missi on pointed out a new Federa­ other hand, are British Protector­ Algeria, for Saharan oil and the tion can succeed only if it wins the ates. Here the chief executive is Belgians in the Congo tried so hard consent of the majority of the in­ a Colonial Office Governor. As a to maintain their hold on the rich habitants in Central Africa. In its result of the March 1960 Constitu- Province of Katanga, the white present form, it is bound to fail, as tion in Nyasaland, Dr Banda's party settlers will certainly not give up with Sir Roy's intractable attitude, got a majority of 23 in the new 33- the Northern Khodesian copper it cannot hope to win support from member Legislative? Council. As far belt without a struggle. This area the Africans, The really serious as the present proposals for North­ provides nearly two-thirds of the factor in the situation is that while ern Rhodesia are concerned, Afri- present Federal income and 60,000 the British Government could hot ran opinion is divided; the Maudl- out of the 71.000 whites of North­ possibly use force to keep the Rho- ing proposals are hardly attractive ern Khodesia are settled in the cop­ desias and Nyasaland together. Sir and although the leader of the per belt and along the railway line Roy Welensky could. This is an United National Independence party linking it with Southern Khodesia. inescapable fact. In the short run, might be tempted to accept these The major business and financial perhaps with a repetition of the proposals, he risks being outbid by groups like Anglo-American, the horrors in Algeria, the Congo and other nationalist leaders if he does.
Recommended publications
  • 1 the African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, C.1950-53
    ‘It has united us far more closely than any other question would have accomplished’.1 The African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, c.1950-53 The documentary record of African opposition to the C[entral] A[frican] F[ederation] has been the subject renewed historiographical interest in recent years.2 This paper seeks to contribute to the existing debate in three principle ways. Firstly, it will be shown that opposition to the scheme was fatally undermined by the pursuit of two very distinct strands of N[yasaland] A[frican] C[ongress] and A[frican] N[ational] C[ongress] political activism. This dissimilar political discourse produced contradictions that resulted in the bypassing African objections. In the third instance, the paper will go a step further, suggesting that the two respective anti-Federation campaigns not only undermined Congress efforts to stop federation, but laid the path for future discord in the national dispensation then materialising. In 1988, John Darwin wrote that ‘with its telescope clapped firmly to its ear, London declared that [African] opposition [to Federation] could be neither seen nor heard’.3 The well-worn historiographical path points to the fact that African opposition was effectively ignored on the basis that ‘partnership’ between white settlers and black Africans in Northern and Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland offered a strong rationale for the CAF. The requisite benefits arising would see the promotion of African economic opportunities, the placation of settler politicians seeking to reduce the influence of the Colonial Office and the preservation of British influence in the region.4 The utility of ‘partnership’ was in its ambiguity.
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Examiner, 1957-19651
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Zambezia (1996), XXIII (ii). THE CENTRAL AFRICAN EXAMINER, 1957-19651 ANTHONY KING2 St Antony's College, Oxford, UK Abstract The Central African Examiner is a well known source for the study of Zimbabwean history in the seminal period 1957-1965, although the story of its foundation and the backroom manoeuvrings which dogged its short life are relatively unknown. Its inception was the result of industry attempting to push the Federal Government into implementing partnership in a practical way. Up to 1960, the Examiner's internal politics mirrored this conflict, and it was during this time that the Examiner's position as a critical supporter of Government policy was at its most ambiguous. After 1960, the Examiner became a more forthright Government critic — indeed by 1964, it was the only medium left for the expression of nationalist opinion. INTRODUCTION IN THE WAKE of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) in Rhodesia on 11 November 1965, censorship was imposed on the press. Most newspapers and magazines appeared with a number of blank spaces which would have been filled with articles had they not fallen foul of the censors. One magazine had so much of its content for the December 1965 issue banned that it resorted to making it a 'Do-It-Yourself edition, urging readers to fill in the blanks themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodesiana Volume 40
    PUBLICATION No. 40 1979 ~ - ...._,,,, _..,,, ..... _ ------ Pre-publication notice SUBSCRIBERS' LIMITED EDITION of PRINTS FROM WATERCOLOURS by ALICE BALFOUR The National Archives announces the publication of a special edition limited to 500 copies of ten colour prints from original watercolours by Alice Balfour. An accomplished amateur artist, she sketched these scenes in South Africa and during a wagon journey through Matabeleland and Mashonaland in 1894. The prints, together with an introductory text, will be contained in a portfolio in which subscribers' names will appear. Price $60, special pre-publication offer $45. If you are interested in subscribing please write for further particulars co: THE DIRECTOR NATIONAL ARCHIVES PRIVATE BAG 7729 CAUSEWAY THOMAS MEIKLE, 1862-1939 The founder of the Meikle Organisation sailed from Scotland with his parents in 1869 The family settled in Natal where Thomas and his brothers John and Stewart gained their first farming ex­ perience. In 1892 the three brothers set off for Rhodesia with eight ox- wagons. Three months later they had completed the 700 mile trek to Fort Victoria. Here they opened a store made of whisky cases and roofed over with the tarpaulins that had covered their wagons. Progress was at first slow, nevertheless, branches were opened in Salisbury in 1893, Bulawayo and Gwelo in 1894, and in Umtali in 1897. From these small beginnings a vast network of stores, hotels, farms, mines and auxilliary undertakings was built up. These ventuies culminated in the formation of the Thomas Meikle Trust and Investment Company in 1933. The success of these many enterprises was mainly due to Thomas Meikle's foresight and his business acumen, coupled with his ability to judge character and gather around him a loyal and efficient staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Ninister of the Crumbling Federation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, Went Fishing Together
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS CB-21 $r Roy Welensky July i, 1963 3 Richmond Close Highlands Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia Mr. Richard Nolte Institute of Current World Affairs 366 Nadison Avenue New York 17, New York Dear Mr. Nolte While Ileads of State in the rest of Africa were meeting .t the summit at Addis Abbaba, a small Southern Summ..i Conference was held at Betty's Bay, South Africa, when Dr. Ver- woerd and Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Ninister of the crumbling Federation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, went fishing together. Sir Roy could not represent the Sou+/-hem Rhodesian government in any off.cial way, His Federation _is breaking up and he will soon be a man without a job. But in spite of this he is still considered a power in politics here and his actions receive careful scrutiny. During the last 25 years he has worked his way through the "tough school of politics".. He ente*ed political life first as a union organizer and then head of the European Railwaymen's Union in Northern Rhodesia's cooprbel%. Over ten years ago he and sir Godfrey Huggins, Prime Ninister of Southern Rhodesia (later Lord Nalvern), together sold Britain on the idea of a federation of the three central African territories, Northern Rhodesia, Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland. tle succeeded Lord hlalvern as Prime linister of the Federation in 1956. From the beei.ning Africans in Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland, qhere there are very few Europeans, distrusted federation. ey saw Europeans in the three territories uniting to control their rising aspira- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(S), 1957-1965
    Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(s), 1957-1965 Joshua Pritchard This thesis interrogates traditional understandings of race within Zimbabwean nationalism. It explores the interactions between socio-cultural identities and belonging in black African nationalist thinking and politics, and focuses on the formative decade between the emergence of mass African nationalist political parties in 1957 and the widespread adoption of an anti- white violent struggle in 1966. It reassesses the place of non-black individuals within African anti-settler movements. Using the chronological narrative provided by the experiences of marginal non-black supporters (including white, Asian, coloured, and Indian individuals), it argues that anti-colonial nationalist organisations during the pre-Liberation War period were heavily influenced by the competing racial theories and politics espoused by their elite leadership. It further argues that the imagined future Zimbabwean nations had a fluid and reflexive positioning of citizens based on racial identities that changed continuously. Finally, this thesis examines the construction of racial identities through the discourse used by black Zimbabweans and non-black migrants and citizens, and the relationships between these groups, to contend that race was an inexorable factor in determining belonging. Drawing upon archival sources created by non-black 'radical' participants and Zimbabwean nationalists, and oral interviews conducted during fieldwork in South Africa and Zimbabwe in 2015, the research is a revisionist approach to existing academic literature on Zimbabwean nationalism: in the words of Terence Ranger, it is not a nationalist history but a history of nationalism. It situates itself within multiple bodies of study, including conceptual nationalist and racial theory, the histories of marginal groups within African nationalist movements, and studies of citizenship and belonging.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Rhodesia Elects Channing B
    SOUTHERN RHODESIA ELECTS CHANNING B. RICHARDSON Professor oj International Affairs at Hamilton College, New York, now Visiting Professor of Political Science at the University College oj Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Administrator, United Nations Arab Refugee Camps, Gaza, 1949-^0. EVER since the Central African Federation was launched in 1953, the unacknowledged but chief task of all political parties has been to define ''partnership'' between the races. As defined in daily attitudes and practices, the word is slowly taking on a meaning which places the Federation far ahead of the Union in some aspects of racial affairs. As defined in law, it bears a meaning not very different from that of apartheid. As defined in the recent territorial elections in Southern Rhodesia, it will probably mean an even slower approach to the granting of African advance and opportunities than the slow approach that has existed to date. To understand these all-important elections, a piece of recent political history must be mentioned. In November of last year, the Federal Party under the Federal Prime Minister, Sir Roy Welensky, united with the United Rhodesia Party (U.R.P.) under the Southern Rhodesian Prime Minister, Mr. R. S. Garfield Todd, to form the United Federal Party (U.F.P.) At the time this seemed like the sensible beginning to a federa­ tion-wide ''middle of the road" party. However, trouble began almost immediately, since the newly "united" party contained within it men of vastly conflicting views towards the African problem. After the fusion had taken place, a group of political leaders led by Sir Patrick Fletcher and other members of the Cabinet, began to seek ways and means of ridding the party of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • White Supremacy and African Awakening IT Was Inevitable That the Crucial Considerations
    THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY March 14, 1959 From the London End White Supremacy and African Awakening IT was inevitable that the crucial considerations. Ghana has been and for employment in unskilled and more basic issues in the established. Next year the Nigerian occupations in the Rhodesias. This Nyasaland 'disturbances' and the Federation a considerably more was to be continued. and hence 'emergency' in other parts of the powerful African complex of 35 mil­ Nyasaland's place in the Federation. Central African Federation should lion—will come into existence. Politically, the inclusion of Nyasa­ be neatly by-passed in the British The Cameroons, both the British land in the Federation strengthened Commons, and for that matter in and French trust territories, will in­ the buffer between pure Black Afri­ discussion in Britain. The fate of evitably join Nigeria. In French can power in West and Equatorial the British Labour M P, Mr Stone- Equatorial Africa, in spite of the Africa and pure White power in the house and the legal position of equivocal form which the 'French South. British immigrants in the Federa­ African Community' is taking, the 'Partnership' Unworkable tion, which have become the princi­ path of independent political deve­ The present onslaught, with pal point of controversy in Britain lopment is equally inevitable. the full connivance of the British as also the question of 'White To the East, the ever-present eye Government, on African opinion in supremacy' all these have been of the U N Trusteeship Council is the Federation, and in particular effectively scotched by the unveri­ making inevitable the growth on the Nyasaland African Congress fied 'plot' which the British Colonial of an independent Black African involving arrests and killings must, Secretary, in strict accordance with Tanganyika; and so too in the Horn therefore, be seen as a stage in the tradition, found in his arsenal of of Africa where a large independent conspiracy to partition the African ready replies to difficult questions.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1442nd GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 8 October 1963, at 10.40 a.m. EIGHTEENTH SESSION Official Records NEW YORK CONTENTS one vote", the United Kingdom had now decided to turn Page over to the settlers control of the Federal army and air force. The settlers for their part had chosen a path Agenda item 75: from which there could be no turning back. Every day Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the that passed was a day in their favour; they had already Special Committee on the Situation with re­ seized most of the land by force, and they monopolized gard to the Implementation of the Declaration the country's resources and means of production; they on the Granting of Independence to Colonial had consolidated their hold by erecting prisons and de­ Countries and Peoples (continued) tention camps for those who werefightingforthe right Hearing of petitioners . • . • • • . • . 53 of self-determination. Realizing that those injustices General debate (continued). • . • • • • . 56 would eventually goad the African masses into action, Hearing of petitioners (continued) . • . 59 the settlers were now asking for an army and an air force with which to wage a ruthless campaign to sup­ Chairman: Mr. ACHKAR Marof (Guinea). press the African nationalist movement. 4. Furthermore, the settlers were now also working out the most subtle plans to put into effect a policy of AGENDA ITEM 75 apartheid thinly disguised under the name "community Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the Special development". In most developing countries, that term Committee on the Situation with regard to the Imple­ applied to programmes aimed at promoting develop­ mentation of the Declaration on the Granting of Inde­ ment through self-help schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Rhodesia Explodes
    63 SOUTHERN RHODESIA EXPLODES ENOCH DUMBUTSHENA Southern Rhodesian Journalist and Member of the National Democratic Party Two weeks after telling the settlers that "no one in Southern Rhodesia need be afraid that what has happened in the Congo could possibly happen here", the Prime Minister of Southern Rhodesia, Sir Edgar Whitehead, called all able-bodied white men to join a new army reserve and a special constabulary. These will form new security forces to maintain peace and order, or, in other words, to suppress any future African riots. Sir Roy Welensky, Federal Prime Minister, has called upon Europeans to join the three European divisions of a new army inspired by the riots in the Congo. The Federal Government will spend an additional £3 million on this army and on equipment. None of the three territories of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland spends as much as £3 million on African education. Last year Southern Rhodesia spent only £2,641,000 on African education. It is interesting to note that Sir Roy's three white divisions were the first indication that the army is now being organized for the defence of white people against Africans in the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Two years ago Sir Roy Welensky spoke of a "Boston Tea Party" should the Federation fail to get its independence; and it can be assumed that he meant by that the possibility of some settler rebellion against Great Britain. Now the army and the police, in the name of maintaining peace and order, will be used to keep the Africans down.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Wilson's Visit to Rhodesia. Mr
    Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 11, December, 1965 Rhodesia, Page 21087 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Mr. Wilson's Visit to Rhodesia. Mr. Harold Wilson's visit to Rhodesia took place from Oct. 25-30 and led to an understanding by both Governments on the establishment of a Royal Commission without, however, any agreement on its terms of reference. In view of this, the British Government accepted a Rhodesian proposal that the people of Rhodesia should be consulted as to whether or not they accepted independence on the basis of the 1961 Constitution, but no agreement was reached on how this should be done. While negotiations were proceeding, the Rhodesian Government on Nov. 5 declared a state of emergency throughout the country. The British Government nevertheless pursued the idea of consultation of the Rhodesian people through the proposed Royal Commission, and Sir Hugh Beadle, the Rhodesian Chief Justice and chairman-designate of the Commission, travelled to London on Nov. 8 for discussions, though he did not have the authority of the Rhodesian Government. Following an exchange of letters between the Queen and the Rhodesian Government on Nov. 9, and a telephone conversation in the early morning of Nov. 11 between Mr. Wilson and Mr. Ian Smith, a declaration of independence was broadcast by Mr. Smith later on Nov. 11. The Governor of Rhodesia immediately repudiated the Rhodesian Government's action, and Mr. Wilson announced in the House of Commons that Mr. Smith's declaration was an illegal act and listed the counter-measures taken, or to be taken, by the British Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Your Information #3 October 1965
    South Alriea: :or your information #3 October 1965 THE RHODESIAN CRISIS Southern Rhodesia, a land-locked, self-governing British colony is a buffer between South Africa and black Africa. A unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) from the UK by the Rhodesian Government would precipitate a major crisis in southern and central Africa. American interest in Zambia and South Africa would be involved. The US has announced that it would help Zambia, Britain and neighboring African states with "economic retaliation" in case of UDI. Yet Smith is conn:nitted to UDI as are most (est. 90%) Rhodesian White settlers. For your information, we summarize the essential elements of the situation. The Significance of Rhodesia is a sovereign state in all but two functions: UDI foreign affairs and the power to make constitutional changes (particularly those affecting franchise provisions); The UK holds these residual powers. Under the present con­ stitution, white settlers (who number about 250,000 or 6% of the population) are guaranteed domination for many years to come. A Land Apportionment Act guarantees them tenure of 40% of the country. A web of legislation prohibits African counter-action. African nationalist groups are banned, their leaders jailed or restricted. The Rhodesian terrain is not conducive to guerrilla activities. The British Government has refused to risk its slim majority by taking any liberalizing initiative in Rhodesia (Lord Salisbury leads a strong Tory bloc sympathetic to settler interests). Hence, the Rhodesian Government has little to gain from UDI save the emotional satisfaction of telling the labor Government where to go. Premier Ian Smith is committed, however, by a referendum in October 1964 and a general election in May 1965 to UDI.
    [Show full text]