White Supremacy and African Awakening IT Was Inevitable That the Crucial Considerations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White Supremacy and African Awakening IT Was Inevitable That the Crucial Considerations THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY March 14, 1959 From the London End White Supremacy and African Awakening IT was inevitable that the crucial considerations. Ghana has been and for employment in unskilled and more basic issues in the established. Next year the Nigerian occupations in the Rhodesias. This Nyasaland 'disturbances' and the Federation a considerably more was to be continued. and hence 'emergency' in other parts of the powerful African complex of 35 mil­ Nyasaland's place in the Federation. Central African Federation should lion—will come into existence. Politically, the inclusion of Nyasa­ be neatly by-passed in the British The Cameroons, both the British land in the Federation strengthened Commons, and for that matter in and French trust territories, will in­ the buffer between pure Black Afri­ discussion in Britain. The fate of evitably join Nigeria. In French can power in West and Equatorial the British Labour M P, Mr Stone- Equatorial Africa, in spite of the Africa and pure White power in the house and the legal position of equivocal form which the 'French South. British immigrants in the Federa­ African Community' is taking, the 'Partnership' Unworkable tion, which have become the princi­ path of independent political deve­ The present onslaught, with pal point of controversy in Britain lopment is equally inevitable. the full connivance of the British as also the question of 'White To the East, the ever-present eye Government, on African opinion in supremacy' all these have been of the U N Trusteeship Council is the Federation, and in particular effectively scotched by the unveri­ making inevitable the growth on the Nyasaland African Congress fied 'plot' which the British Colonial of an independent Black African involving arrests and killings must, Secretary, in strict accordance with Tanganyika; and so too in the Horn therefore, be seen as a stage in the tradition, found in his arsenal of of Africa where a large independent conspiracy to partition the African ready replies to difficult questions. Somaliland is now on the agenda. continent and secure White power These developments change consi­ Demarcating Black and White on a permanent basis in Central derably the complexion of Africa and South Africa. This conspiracy The basic question in Central and and impart a strong feeling of in­ involved the final changes in the South Africa is the future of White security to the regimes in the Federation's Constitution which Sir settler power in an area with a South whose policies of White supre­ Roy Welensky so successfully can­ preponderent indigenous African macy have up to now been sustain­ vassed in London early this year. population. Soon after the Accra ed by a non-political indigenous Of course, there is much glib talk Conference it was reported that Sir African population at home and by of 'racial partnership' in the Fede­ Roy Welensky, Prime Minister of colonial power to the north. the Federation, was engaged in cer­ ration', but events since 1953 show Ensuring Nyasa Labour Supply tain discussions with South Africa. the cynical unconcern of the White In retrospect the creation of the It was clear from press despat­ settlers for African opinion and the Central African Federation way ches then that the South African hypocrisy of their professions. back in 1953 appears to have been all-White Government of Dr Ver- motivated by considerations of What in fact the White settlers woerd was strongly aware of the partitioning the African Continent and with them the British authori­ changed balance of racial power on along racial lines so as to secure, ties have not understood or had not the African continent and was be­ permanently, White supremacy in bargained for. is the sudden emer­ coming particularly anxious about the South. One seeming incongruity gence of political consciousness its own security in this new balance. was the inclusion of Nyasaland in among the indigenous African popu­ It was in this situation that Sir the Federation. The British Colo­ lation and the striking new ability Roy Welensky was taken into con­ nial Office then argued that Nyasa­ of the African people to undertake fidence by South Africa on a line land was not economically viable political organisation and action of action which had the ultimate by itself and had much to gain by which now makes impossible the aim of partitioning the African con­ being associated with the Rhodesias. complete realisation of final White tinent into areas of pure Black and However, Nyasaland African opi­ hegemony in Southern and Central White power respectively, with the nion argued that they had more in Africa. This certainly is the lesson Belgian Congo and Portuguese An­ common with Tanganyika than in Nyasaland and although the Bri­ gola as effective colonial buffers with Southern Rhodesia but the tish authorities remain committed between these two broad areas. British authorities refused to listen. to establish the Federation, there When Sir Roy Welensky visited Instead they pushed ahead their can be no certainty as to its actual London early this year this scheme plans for integrating Nyasaland in­ realisation now. of things was certainly outlined to to the Federation which, as events the British Authorities, and from Savage Repression have proved, was designed to se­ The crisis for the policy of White the current attitude of the Colonial cure for the White settlers a system Office to the declaration of a state supremacy is nowhere more decisive of constitutional power similar to than in South Africa. There the of emergency in Nyasaland, it is that of the Union of South Africa. clear that the Macmillan Govern­ White electorate, comprising one- ment has acceded to this scheme The inclusion of Nyasaland in fifth of the population, gave in May for Africa. this Federal arrangement was mo­ 1958 another overwhelnning man­ tivated more by two other factors, date for a policy of White domina­ Freedom : West to East one economic and the other politi­ tion and for a more savage repres­ The essential lines of the policy cal. Nyasaland has always been a sion of the African people. This indeed of the South and Central African source of cheap migratory labour is the content of Apartheid, Not nexus arise from the following for the gold mines of South Africa satisfied with the vast and compli- 379 March 14, 1959 THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY cated network of racial and oppres­ desperate White minority into acts ZAMBIA CONGRESS BANNED sive legislation, adopted and imple­ of violence and oppression. This is THE Government of Northern mented since 1948, the Verwoerd the essence of the conspiracy which Rhodesia banned the Zambia Na­ Government has now announced its takes such brutal forms in Nyasa- tional Congress and arrested all its intention or withdrawing the paltry land and which takes its inexorable leaders on March 12. A state of representation of Africans in Par­ course towards a climax regardless emergency was, however, not de­ liament (3 Whites have represent­ of life and liberty to the African clared. Announcing the ban ed 11 million Africans against 159 people. But the surest guarantee Governor Benson said that the representatives for 2½ million that this conspiracy will not reach Congress was like the notorious Whites in the Legislative Assem­ full realisation is the growth of U. S. racketeer organisation, Murder bly). Simultaneously the plan for determined African political consci­ Incorporated'. He said it terrorised a subordinate African education by ousness. And the events in the Bel­ law abiding Africans to stop them barring admission of African stu­ gian Congo, in Nyasaland as well from using their vote in the election dents in the two remaining non- as the Treason Trials in South due on March 20. The Governor racial universities in the country is Africa reflect this political awaken­ alleged that the Congress used being implemented. ing. witchcraft to achieve its aims. What prompts the South African Government to pursue with such relentless force and vigour a policy which will only hasten the inevit­ able collapse of that policy and with it the whole system of race oppres­ sion and White supremacy? Indeed, long before the party of Dr Ver­ woerd came to power, a sufficiently all-embracing system of race segre­ gation was created, assuring the permanent entry of the non-White peoples into the cheap labour pool to satisfy the requirements of the gold mining monopolies and the White farmers. And yet the con­ siderably more oppressive policy of Apartheid was devised and applied with increasing vigour. Here, are three answers to the question, all of which apply with equal force in the Central African Federation, Growing Political Consciousness In the first place, there has been an immense growth in the political consciousness of the non-White peoples and in the influence of the African National Congress, Thus in South Africa there Is no argu­ ment as to the fact that the politi­ cal opposition to the Verwoerd Government is the Congress move­ ment and not any other party in Parliament. The Treason Trial has been a trial of the Congress and its leaders for having formulated the only alternative to the ruling policy of .Apartheid. Next, there has been the visible growth of a fully inte­ grated African working class, ur­ banised and with a growing trade union consciousness demanding a political place in the rapidly chang­ ing climate of industrialisation. Finally, the growth of national libe­ ration movements and attainment of political independence in the. rest of Black Africa have decisively weak­ ened the relative position of the South African regime. All these factors drive the now 380 .
Recommended publications
  • 1 the African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, C.1950-53
    ‘It has united us far more closely than any other question would have accomplished’.1 The African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, c.1950-53 The documentary record of African opposition to the C[entral] A[frican] F[ederation] has been the subject renewed historiographical interest in recent years.2 This paper seeks to contribute to the existing debate in three principle ways. Firstly, it will be shown that opposition to the scheme was fatally undermined by the pursuit of two very distinct strands of N[yasaland] A[frican] C[ongress] and A[frican] N[ational] C[ongress] political activism. This dissimilar political discourse produced contradictions that resulted in the bypassing African objections. In the third instance, the paper will go a step further, suggesting that the two respective anti-Federation campaigns not only undermined Congress efforts to stop federation, but laid the path for future discord in the national dispensation then materialising. In 1988, John Darwin wrote that ‘with its telescope clapped firmly to its ear, London declared that [African] opposition [to Federation] could be neither seen nor heard’.3 The well-worn historiographical path points to the fact that African opposition was effectively ignored on the basis that ‘partnership’ between white settlers and black Africans in Northern and Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland offered a strong rationale for the CAF. The requisite benefits arising would see the promotion of African economic opportunities, the placation of settler politicians seeking to reduce the influence of the Colonial Office and the preservation of British influence in the region.4 The utility of ‘partnership’ was in its ambiguity.
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Examiner, 1957-19651
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Zambezia (1996), XXIII (ii). THE CENTRAL AFRICAN EXAMINER, 1957-19651 ANTHONY KING2 St Antony's College, Oxford, UK Abstract The Central African Examiner is a well known source for the study of Zimbabwean history in the seminal period 1957-1965, although the story of its foundation and the backroom manoeuvrings which dogged its short life are relatively unknown. Its inception was the result of industry attempting to push the Federal Government into implementing partnership in a practical way. Up to 1960, the Examiner's internal politics mirrored this conflict, and it was during this time that the Examiner's position as a critical supporter of Government policy was at its most ambiguous. After 1960, the Examiner became a more forthright Government critic — indeed by 1964, it was the only medium left for the expression of nationalist opinion. INTRODUCTION IN THE WAKE of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) in Rhodesia on 11 November 1965, censorship was imposed on the press. Most newspapers and magazines appeared with a number of blank spaces which would have been filled with articles had they not fallen foul of the censors. One magazine had so much of its content for the December 1965 issue banned that it resorted to making it a 'Do-It-Yourself edition, urging readers to fill in the blanks themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodesiana Volume 40
    PUBLICATION No. 40 1979 ~ - ...._,,,, _..,,, ..... _ ------ Pre-publication notice SUBSCRIBERS' LIMITED EDITION of PRINTS FROM WATERCOLOURS by ALICE BALFOUR The National Archives announces the publication of a special edition limited to 500 copies of ten colour prints from original watercolours by Alice Balfour. An accomplished amateur artist, she sketched these scenes in South Africa and during a wagon journey through Matabeleland and Mashonaland in 1894. The prints, together with an introductory text, will be contained in a portfolio in which subscribers' names will appear. Price $60, special pre-publication offer $45. If you are interested in subscribing please write for further particulars co: THE DIRECTOR NATIONAL ARCHIVES PRIVATE BAG 7729 CAUSEWAY THOMAS MEIKLE, 1862-1939 The founder of the Meikle Organisation sailed from Scotland with his parents in 1869 The family settled in Natal where Thomas and his brothers John and Stewart gained their first farming ex­ perience. In 1892 the three brothers set off for Rhodesia with eight ox- wagons. Three months later they had completed the 700 mile trek to Fort Victoria. Here they opened a store made of whisky cases and roofed over with the tarpaulins that had covered their wagons. Progress was at first slow, nevertheless, branches were opened in Salisbury in 1893, Bulawayo and Gwelo in 1894, and in Umtali in 1897. From these small beginnings a vast network of stores, hotels, farms, mines and auxilliary undertakings was built up. These ventuies culminated in the formation of the Thomas Meikle Trust and Investment Company in 1933. The success of these many enterprises was mainly due to Thomas Meikle's foresight and his business acumen, coupled with his ability to judge character and gather around him a loyal and efficient staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Ninister of the Crumbling Federation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, Went Fishing Together
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS CB-21 $r Roy Welensky July i, 1963 3 Richmond Close Highlands Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia Mr. Richard Nolte Institute of Current World Affairs 366 Nadison Avenue New York 17, New York Dear Mr. Nolte While Ileads of State in the rest of Africa were meeting .t the summit at Addis Abbaba, a small Southern Summ..i Conference was held at Betty's Bay, South Africa, when Dr. Ver- woerd and Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Ninister of the crumbling Federation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, went fishing together. Sir Roy could not represent the Sou+/-hem Rhodesian government in any off.cial way, His Federation _is breaking up and he will soon be a man without a job. But in spite of this he is still considered a power in politics here and his actions receive careful scrutiny. During the last 25 years he has worked his way through the "tough school of politics".. He ente*ed political life first as a union organizer and then head of the European Railwaymen's Union in Northern Rhodesia's cooprbel%. Over ten years ago he and sir Godfrey Huggins, Prime Ninister of Southern Rhodesia (later Lord Nalvern), together sold Britain on the idea of a federation of the three central African territories, Northern Rhodesia, Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland. tle succeeded Lord hlalvern as Prime linister of the Federation in 1956. From the beei.ning Africans in Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland, qhere there are very few Europeans, distrusted federation. ey saw Europeans in the three territories uniting to control their rising aspira- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(S), 1957-1965
    Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(s), 1957-1965 Joshua Pritchard This thesis interrogates traditional understandings of race within Zimbabwean nationalism. It explores the interactions between socio-cultural identities and belonging in black African nationalist thinking and politics, and focuses on the formative decade between the emergence of mass African nationalist political parties in 1957 and the widespread adoption of an anti- white violent struggle in 1966. It reassesses the place of non-black individuals within African anti-settler movements. Using the chronological narrative provided by the experiences of marginal non-black supporters (including white, Asian, coloured, and Indian individuals), it argues that anti-colonial nationalist organisations during the pre-Liberation War period were heavily influenced by the competing racial theories and politics espoused by their elite leadership. It further argues that the imagined future Zimbabwean nations had a fluid and reflexive positioning of citizens based on racial identities that changed continuously. Finally, this thesis examines the construction of racial identities through the discourse used by black Zimbabweans and non-black migrants and citizens, and the relationships between these groups, to contend that race was an inexorable factor in determining belonging. Drawing upon archival sources created by non-black 'radical' participants and Zimbabwean nationalists, and oral interviews conducted during fieldwork in South Africa and Zimbabwe in 2015, the research is a revisionist approach to existing academic literature on Zimbabwean nationalism: in the words of Terence Ranger, it is not a nationalist history but a history of nationalism. It situates itself within multiple bodies of study, including conceptual nationalist and racial theory, the histories of marginal groups within African nationalist movements, and studies of citizenship and belonging.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Rhodesia Elects Channing B
    SOUTHERN RHODESIA ELECTS CHANNING B. RICHARDSON Professor oj International Affairs at Hamilton College, New York, now Visiting Professor of Political Science at the University College oj Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Administrator, United Nations Arab Refugee Camps, Gaza, 1949-^0. EVER since the Central African Federation was launched in 1953, the unacknowledged but chief task of all political parties has been to define ''partnership'' between the races. As defined in daily attitudes and practices, the word is slowly taking on a meaning which places the Federation far ahead of the Union in some aspects of racial affairs. As defined in law, it bears a meaning not very different from that of apartheid. As defined in the recent territorial elections in Southern Rhodesia, it will probably mean an even slower approach to the granting of African advance and opportunities than the slow approach that has existed to date. To understand these all-important elections, a piece of recent political history must be mentioned. In November of last year, the Federal Party under the Federal Prime Minister, Sir Roy Welensky, united with the United Rhodesia Party (U.R.P.) under the Southern Rhodesian Prime Minister, Mr. R. S. Garfield Todd, to form the United Federal Party (U.F.P.) At the time this seemed like the sensible beginning to a federa­ tion-wide ''middle of the road" party. However, trouble began almost immediately, since the newly "united" party contained within it men of vastly conflicting views towards the African problem. After the fusion had taken place, a group of political leaders led by Sir Patrick Fletcher and other members of the Cabinet, began to seek ways and means of ridding the party of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1442nd GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 8 October 1963, at 10.40 a.m. EIGHTEENTH SESSION Official Records NEW YORK CONTENTS one vote", the United Kingdom had now decided to turn Page over to the settlers control of the Federal army and air force. The settlers for their part had chosen a path Agenda item 75: from which there could be no turning back. Every day Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the that passed was a day in their favour; they had already Special Committee on the Situation with re­ seized most of the land by force, and they monopolized gard to the Implementation of the Declaration the country's resources and means of production; they on the Granting of Independence to Colonial had consolidated their hold by erecting prisons and de­ Countries and Peoples (continued) tention camps for those who werefightingforthe right Hearing of petitioners . • . • • • . • . 53 of self-determination. Realizing that those injustices General debate (continued). • . • • • • . 56 would eventually goad the African masses into action, Hearing of petitioners (continued) . • . 59 the settlers were now asking for an army and an air force with which to wage a ruthless campaign to sup­ Chairman: Mr. ACHKAR Marof (Guinea). press the African nationalist movement. 4. Furthermore, the settlers were now also working out the most subtle plans to put into effect a policy of AGENDA ITEM 75 apartheid thinly disguised under the name "community Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the Special development". In most developing countries, that term Committee on the Situation with regard to the Imple­ applied to programmes aimed at promoting develop­ mentation of the Declaration on the Granting of Inde­ ment through self-help schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Rhodesia Explodes
    63 SOUTHERN RHODESIA EXPLODES ENOCH DUMBUTSHENA Southern Rhodesian Journalist and Member of the National Democratic Party Two weeks after telling the settlers that "no one in Southern Rhodesia need be afraid that what has happened in the Congo could possibly happen here", the Prime Minister of Southern Rhodesia, Sir Edgar Whitehead, called all able-bodied white men to join a new army reserve and a special constabulary. These will form new security forces to maintain peace and order, or, in other words, to suppress any future African riots. Sir Roy Welensky, Federal Prime Minister, has called upon Europeans to join the three European divisions of a new army inspired by the riots in the Congo. The Federal Government will spend an additional £3 million on this army and on equipment. None of the three territories of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland spends as much as £3 million on African education. Last year Southern Rhodesia spent only £2,641,000 on African education. It is interesting to note that Sir Roy's three white divisions were the first indication that the army is now being organized for the defence of white people against Africans in the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Two years ago Sir Roy Welensky spoke of a "Boston Tea Party" should the Federation fail to get its independence; and it can be assumed that he meant by that the possibility of some settler rebellion against Great Britain. Now the army and the police, in the name of maintaining peace and order, will be used to keep the Africans down.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Wilson's Visit to Rhodesia. Mr
    Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 11, December, 1965 Rhodesia, Page 21087 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Mr. Wilson's Visit to Rhodesia. Mr. Harold Wilson's visit to Rhodesia took place from Oct. 25-30 and led to an understanding by both Governments on the establishment of a Royal Commission without, however, any agreement on its terms of reference. In view of this, the British Government accepted a Rhodesian proposal that the people of Rhodesia should be consulted as to whether or not they accepted independence on the basis of the 1961 Constitution, but no agreement was reached on how this should be done. While negotiations were proceeding, the Rhodesian Government on Nov. 5 declared a state of emergency throughout the country. The British Government nevertheless pursued the idea of consultation of the Rhodesian people through the proposed Royal Commission, and Sir Hugh Beadle, the Rhodesian Chief Justice and chairman-designate of the Commission, travelled to London on Nov. 8 for discussions, though he did not have the authority of the Rhodesian Government. Following an exchange of letters between the Queen and the Rhodesian Government on Nov. 9, and a telephone conversation in the early morning of Nov. 11 between Mr. Wilson and Mr. Ian Smith, a declaration of independence was broadcast by Mr. Smith later on Nov. 11. The Governor of Rhodesia immediately repudiated the Rhodesian Government's action, and Mr. Wilson announced in the House of Commons that Mr. Smith's declaration was an illegal act and listed the counter-measures taken, or to be taken, by the British Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Your Information #3 October 1965
    South Alriea: :or your information #3 October 1965 THE RHODESIAN CRISIS Southern Rhodesia, a land-locked, self-governing British colony is a buffer between South Africa and black Africa. A unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) from the UK by the Rhodesian Government would precipitate a major crisis in southern and central Africa. American interest in Zambia and South Africa would be involved. The US has announced that it would help Zambia, Britain and neighboring African states with "economic retaliation" in case of UDI. Yet Smith is conn:nitted to UDI as are most (est. 90%) Rhodesian White settlers. For your information, we summarize the essential elements of the situation. The Significance of Rhodesia is a sovereign state in all but two functions: UDI foreign affairs and the power to make constitutional changes (particularly those affecting franchise provisions); The UK holds these residual powers. Under the present con­ stitution, white settlers (who number about 250,000 or 6% of the population) are guaranteed domination for many years to come. A Land Apportionment Act guarantees them tenure of 40% of the country. A web of legislation prohibits African counter-action. African nationalist groups are banned, their leaders jailed or restricted. The Rhodesian terrain is not conducive to guerrilla activities. The British Government has refused to risk its slim majority by taking any liberalizing initiative in Rhodesia (Lord Salisbury leads a strong Tory bloc sympathetic to settler interests). Hence, the Rhodesian Government has little to gain from UDI save the emotional satisfaction of telling the labor Government where to go. Premier Ian Smith is committed, however, by a referendum in October 1964 and a general election in May 1965 to UDI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland Under a Fulbright Grant
    50 cents AFRICCA TODAY PAMN PHLET%*# The FEDERATION of RHODESIAand NYASALAND: THE CONTRIBUTORS CHANNING B. RICHARDSON is Professor of Government at Hamilton College, New York. During 1957-58 he lived in the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland under a Fulbright Grant. A graduate of Amherst College and Columbia Uni versity, Dr. Richardson directed a displaced persons camp in Germany and Arab refugee camps in Palestine. He has written articles for the Foreign Policy Association, Africa South, etc. M. IV. KANYAMA CHIUME was born in Nyasaland in 1929. He attended Makerere College in Uganda and taught in a mission school in Tanganyika. He returned to Nyasaland in 1954 and was elected to the Nyasaland Legisla tive Council. In 1958 he became publicity secretary of the Nyasaland African Congress and attended the All-African People's Conference in Ghana. He was in Mombasa when the emergency was declared in Nyasaland and has since travelled widely in Africa, Europe, and the United States pleading the cause of self-government for Nyasaland. Guy CLUTTON-BROCK was born in 1906 and graduated from Cambridge Uni versity. He was director of several London social settlements before going to Africa. For a decade beginning in 1949 he was director of agricultural and village development at St. Faith's Mission, Rusape, Southern Rhodesia. In February, 1959, he was imprisoned for a month under the emergency regula tions of Southern Rhodesia. He is chairman of the Southern Rhodesia De tainees Legal Aid and Welfare Fund and representative of the African Devel opment Trust in Central Africa. He is author of the new book, "Dawn in Nyasaland," published by Hodder and Stoughton in England.
    [Show full text]