DOCSLIB.ORG

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE EPA ID: OH7571724312 OU 12 DAYTON, OH 09/29/1999 Record of Decision Groundwater Operable Unit Groundwater Basewide Monitoring Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE EPA ID: OH7571724312 OU 12 DAYTON, OH 09/29/1999 Record of Decision Groundwater Operable Unit Groundwater Basewide Monitoring Program EPA/ROD/R05-99/506 1999 EPA Superfund Record of Decision: WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE EPA ID: OH7571724312 OU 12 DAYTON, OH 09/29/1999 Record of Decision Groundwater Operable Unit Groundwater Basewide Monitoring Program Wright-Patterson Air Force Base 88th Air Base Wing Office of Environmental Management RESTORE PROTECT ENHANCE September 8, 1999 RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE GROUNDWATER OPERABLE UNIT AT WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE Wright-Patterson Air Force Base 88th Air Base Wing Office of Environmental Management Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio September 8, 1999 Table of Contents I THE DECLARATION 1.0 Site Name and Location .................................................. I-1 2.0 Statement of Basis and Purpose........................................... I-1 3.0 Assessment of the Site................................................... I-1 4.0 Description of the Selected Remedy....................................... I-1 5.0 Data Certification Checklist ............................................ I-2 II DECISION SUMMARY 1.0 Site Name, Location, and Description.................................... II-1 1.1 Site Location and Description ...................................... II-1 1.2 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Description.............................. II-1 2.0 Site History and Enforcement Activities ................................ II-2 3.0 Highlights of Community Participation................................... II-3 4.0 Scope and Role of Response Action Within Site Strategy.................. II-3 5.0 Summary of Site Characteristics ........................................ II-4 6.0 Summary of Site Risks................................................... II-5 6.1 Groundwater Human Health Risk....................................... II-5 6.1.1 Current Conditions Risk Assessment (CCRA).................. II-6 6.1.2 Future Conditions Risk Assessment (FCRA)................... II-6 6.2 Ecological Risk Evaluation of Surface Water and Sediment ........... II-7 7.0 Determination of Groundwater Remediation Goals and Removal Action Objectives ............................................................. II-7 8.0 Description of Alternatives............................................. II-8 8.1 Further Action Area A............................................... II-8 8.1.1 General Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characteristics ........ II-9 8.1.2 Contaminant Characteristics ............................... II-9 8.2 Further Action Area B .............................................. II-12 8.2.1 General Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characteristics ........ II-12 8.2.2 Contaminant Characteristics ............................... II-12 8.3 Remainder of GWOU................................................... II-13 9.0 Summary of the Comparative Analysis of Alternatives..................... II-14 9.1 Further Action Area A............................................... II-16 9.2 Further Action Area B .............................................. II-18 9.3 Remainder of GWOU................................................... II-19 10.0 The Selected Remedy..................................................... II-21 10.1 Remedy Description for FAA-A....................................... II-22 10.2 Remedy Description for FAA-B....................................... II-23 10.3 Remedy Description for the Remainder of the GWOU .................. II-23 11.0 Statutory Determination ................................................ II-23 11.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment .................... II-23 11.2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements II-24 11.3 Cost-Effectiveness................................................. II-24 11.4 Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable..................... II-24 12.0 Documentation of No Significant Change.................................. II-25 III RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY Index of Documents in the Administrative Record Pertinent to the Groundwater Operable Unit List of Tables Table 1 – Remediation Goals for COPCs Table 2 – List of ARARs for the GWOU Table 3 – Estimated Cost of Remedy for GWOU List of Figures Figure 1 – Area Location Map Figure 2 – Site Location Map Figure 3 – Current Organics Cancer Risk Contour Map Figure 4 – Organics 30 Year Cancer Risk Contour Map Figure 5 – Location of Further Action Area A Figure 6 – PCE Concentration in Groundwater – Further Action Area A Figure 7 – TCE Concentration in Groundwater – Further Action Area A Figure 8 – TCE in Selected Wells as a Function of Time Figure 9 – Vinyl Chloride Concentration in Groundwater – Further Action Area B Figure 10 – Groundwater Treatment System Process Flow Diagram ABBREVIATIONS AOC Administrative Orders on Consent ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements AFMC Air Force Materiel Command ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry BMP Basewide Monitoring Program CCRA Current Conditions Human Health Risk Assessment CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern EcoRA Ecological Risk Assessment EE/CA Engineering Evaluation/ Cost Analysis FAA Further Action Area FS Feasibility Study FCRA Future Conditions Human Health Risk Assessment GWOU Groundwater Operable Unit gpm gallons per minute HI Hazard Index HQ Hazard Quotient IRP Installation Restoration Program MCL Maximum Contaminant Level NCP National Contingency Plan NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL National Priority List OAC Ohio Administrative Code OEPA Ohio Environmental Protection Agency O&M Operation and Maintenance OU Operable Unit PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon PCE Perchloroethylene or Tetrachloroethylene PELP Potential Exposure Location Point PW Present Worth RA Remedial Action RD Remedial Design RAO Removal Action Objective RI Remedial Investigation ROD Record of Decision SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SI Site Investigation TCE Trichloroethylene USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USGS United States Geological Survey UV/OX Ultraviolet/ Oxidation VOC Volatile Organic Compound WPAFB Wright-Patterson Air Force Base I THE DECLARATION 1.0 Site Name and Location This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses the findings of investigations at Installation Restoration Program (IRP) Sites OT069 and OT070 (also known as the Groundwater Operable Unit [GWOU]) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB). WPAFB is located in Greene and Montgomery Counties, Ohio. 2.0 Statement of Basis and Purpose This decision document presents the rationale for the selected remedial alternative for the GWOU at WPAFB. The selection process was conducted in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The United States Air Force (USAF) is the lead agency for WPAFB with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Ohio EPA (OEPA) as support agencies. The lead agency, USAF, along with the support agencies, USEPA and OEPA, recommend the selected alternative for the GWOU. This decision is based on the Administrative Record for WPAFB. 3.0 Assessment of the Site The USAF has determined that actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from this site, if not addressed by implementing the response action selected in this ROD, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment. These risks will be addressed by implementing the recommendations presented in this ROD. 4.0 Description of the Selected Remedy This ROD presents the selected remedy for the GWOU at WPAFB. This ROD is the sixth and final ROD for sites at WPAFB. Previous RODs have addressed sources of contamination at identified Operable Units (OUs) and individual sites within those OUs. The selected remedy addresses the principal threats posed by groundwater at WPAFB by treating the most highly contaminated areas of groundwater and those areas of contaminated groundwater most likely to migrate off-site. The selected remedy for the GWOU at WPAFB is: • Continue current groundwater extraction, treatment and discharge at the WPAFB property boundary in OU5 and continue long- term monitoring in this area. This area has been termed “Further Action Area A”. • In-situ chemical oxidation in the area near Spill Site 11 and monitoring. This area has been termed “Further Action Area B”. • Long-term monitoring for the remainder of the GWOU. Those areas to be monitored are: - Areas that exceed Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for organic contaminants of potential concern (COPCs), but do not exceed the target risk range of 1x10-4 to 1x10-6. - Areas that exceed a cumulative cancer risk of 1x10-4 or a Hazard Index of 1 for organic COPCs, but do not exceed MCLs. - Areas exceeding remediation goals (MCLs or background) for inorganic COPCs. - Areas with existing remedies in place (OU1 and OU2). I-1 • Access restrictions to limit access to groundwater. The bulk of the GWOU is located within an active military installation with limited access. This access restriction is applicable to the installation of private wells and new public water supply well fields. Public water supply wells will require approval from the State of Ohio prior to installation. WPAFB, as an active military installation, will control the installation of private wells.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The
    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for the Realignment of the National Airborne Operations Center to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (Project No
    OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CWSURE BUDGET DATA FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF THE I NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER TO jll WRIGHT-PATTERSON, AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO i~! ~~~ ~;: Report No. 96-154 June 10, 1996 l1~t~ttHttt;~t~t~~;m~=~t~It§MMJW}.mltrtBJU~@@~m~M1;~mimrn~~m§mr@~;~f:;~;~u~~;~~f:~wrt.:~;~tmilimJ@m~~=m1t Department of Defense Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this audit report, contact the Secondary Reports Distribution Unit of the Analysis, Planning, and Technical Support Directorate at (703) 604-8937 (DSN 664-8937) or FAX (703) 604-8932. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Planning and Coordination Branch of the Analysis, Planning, and Technical Support Directorate at (703) 604-8939 (DSN 664-8939) or FAX (703) 604-8932. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: OAIG-AUD (ATTN: APTS Audit Suggestions) Inspector General, Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, Virginia 22202-2884 Defense Hotline To report fraud, waste, or abuse, contact the Defense Hotline by calling (800) 424-9098; by sending an electronic message to [email protected]; or by writing the Defense Hotline, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20301-1900. The identity of each writer and caller is fully protected. Acronyms BRAC Base Realignment and Closure MILCON Military Construction INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-2884 Report No. 96-154 June 10, 1996 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) SUBJECT: Audit of Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for the Realignment of the National Airborne Operations Center to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Warren A. Seidel Education Assignments
    MR. WARREN A. SEIDEL Mr. Warren A. Seidel was the Chief of Labor and Environmental Law at the 412th Test Wing, Edwards Air Force Base, California, where he assisted the Staff Judge Advocate managing a broad spectrum of labor and environmental law support to execute the wing’s mission as the premier test and evaluation facility for aerospace vehicles in the Air Force. The installation encompasses over 300,000 acres and is the second largest base in the United States Air Force. Mr. Seidel was born and raised in Ohio. He entered active duty via the Direct Appointment Program in 1989. Following separation from the Air Force, Mr. Seidel became an Assistant General Counsel for the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA) at Fort Lee, VA. In July 1999, Mr. Seidel returned to Edwards Air Force Base and began duties in his present position. Mr. Seidel died on March 18th after a brief battle with Pancreatic cancer and is survived by his wife, Nadine Nichter-Seidel,and his son Trevor and daughter, Ashley both who reside in Las Vegas EDUCATION 1984 Bachelor of Arts (Economics), College of Wooster, Wooster, OH 1987 Juris Doctor (cum laude), Ohio State University College of Law, Columbus, OH ​ ​ ASSIGNMENTS 1. October 1989 - April 1991, Assistant Staff Judge Advocate, 56th Tactical Training Wing, MacDill Air Force Base, FL 2. April 1991 - April 1993, Assistant Staff Judge Advocate, 88th Air Base Wing, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 3. April 1993 - June 1996, Assistant Staff Judge Advocate (Chief of Civil Law, Chief of Labor Law, Chief of Military Justice), Air Force Flight Test Center, Edwards Air Force Base, CA 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Enhancement Program Holds Panel of Senior Leaders Daisy Grant on Base
    Vol. 76, No. 25 Tinker Air Force Base, Okla. Friday, June 22, 2018 Piazza Gate AFSC commander presents keynote will be closed June 22, 5:30 p.m. to June 25, 4:30 a.m. speech during Sovereignty Symposium for road construction. Pegasus Gate and Truck Gate open 24-hours during this time. INSIDE Cloud Hosted Enterprise Services, the DOD’s transition to Microsoft Offi ce 365 Page 6 Plating shop undergoing Air Force Sustainment Center Commander Lt. Gen. Lee K. Levy II delivers the keynote address during the 31st annual Sovereignty Symposium June 6, in downtown renovations Oklahoma City. The symposium, hosted by the Oklahoma Supreme Court justices, provides a forum on Indian law where legal issues can be exchanged in a non-ad- versarial environment. The general’s speech focused on the infrastructure of relationships, which must be “nurtured, maintained and watered constantly because they Page 8 connect our past with our future.” See full story on Page 3. (U.S. Air Force photo/April McDonald) Employee Enhancement Program holds panel of senior leaders Daisy Grant on base. The panel included Staff Writer discussion and intermittent question-and-answer sessions, Senior leaders spoke with with panel members giving members of a professional suggested readings. Sun sets on Air development program about Stamey began the discussion Force Academy- leadership and advancement at a by defi ning toxic leadership, hosted 2018 recent panel. which he said can “kill” or Warrior Games The panel made up of “devastate” an organization. three members, spoke to the “A toxic leader is someone who Pages 12-13 Employee Enhancement Program abuses their power, they promote participants on June 13 at the themselves instead of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Air Force Base
    PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TULLAHOMA TN Vol. 66, No. 11 Arnold AFB, Tenn. PERMIT NO. 29 June 3, 2019 Bunch assumes command of AFMC By Air Force Materiel Command ees and manages nearly $60 billion and Mission Support Center provides Public Affairs annually. The command oversees combat support impacting installa- eight Air Force installations nation- tion operations and Airmen readiness WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR wide and is charged with developing, across the Air Force. FORCE BASE, Ohio – Gen. Arnold acquiring, modernizing and sustain- Bunch takes the banner of AFMC W. Bunch, Jr. assumed command of ing Air Force weapon systems across as the new National Defense Strategy the Air Force Materiel Command at their life cycle. focuses each of the services on inno- Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, The AFMC portfolio ranges from vation, cost-effective modernization Ohio, during a ceremony May 31, at basic and applied scientific research, and enhancing lethality to address the the National Museum of the U.S. Air to Air Force uniforms, to information challenge of great power competition. Force. systems and software, to manned and He is a graduate of the U.S. Air He previously served as Military unmanned aircraft, and directed en- Force Academy and the U.S. Air Deputy, Office of the Assistant Secre- ergy weapons. Force Test Pilot School. The B-52 tary of the Air Force for Acquisition, The command includes six centers, and B-2 bombers are among the many Technology and Logistics at the Pen- including acquisition product centers, aircraft he has flown. tagon, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 746Th Test Squadron Celebrates Diamond Anniversary by Staff Sgt
    PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TULLAHOMA TN Vol. 66, No. 21 Arnold AFB, Tenn. PERMIT NO. 29 November 4, 2019 Replacing decades-old exhauster motors expected to increase reliability, availability for testing base wide By Deidre Moon ing five motors with three, each 10,000 AEDC Public Affairs horsepower,” he said. “These will sup- port three of the six compressors in B Exhauster motors near the Arnold Plant.” Engineering Development Complex En- Combined with the A motor re- gine Test Facility at Arnold Air Force placement project, this is a $32 million Base are being replaced after being in project. In A Plant, four motors will be service since at least 1958. replaced with two new ones, 38,000 The motors, referred to as the A and horsepower each. B exhauster motors, have been used to These exhauster motors not only sup- exhaust up to a combined total of 1,100 port engine testing for jet engine cells pounds of air per second during testing. J-1 and J-2, but also support testing at In the 61-plus years that the motors the J-6 Large Rocket Motor Test Facil- have been in use, they have supported ity, the H2 High Temperature Lab and the testing of numerous aircraft engines, the Propulsion Wind Tunnel Facility. including those used for the B-1 Lancer, “They’re integral to the entire base B-47 Stratojet, B-52 Stratofortress, C-5 and each of the Combined Test Forces Galaxy, F-15 Eagle, F-16 Fighting Fal- on the base because they all utilize this con, F-22 Raptor, F-35 Lightning II and exhaust plant,” Knauf said.
    [Show full text]
  • National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force
    National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force Report to the President and Congress of the United States JANUARY 30, 2014 National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force Suite 200, James Polk Building 2521 South Clark Street Arlington, VA 22202 (703) 545-9113 Dennis McCarthy January 30, 2014 Chair President Barack Obama Erin C. Conaton The White House Vice chair 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 22002 Les Brownlee The Honorable Carl Levin The Honorable James Inhofe Janine Davidson Chairman, Committee Ranking Member, Committee Margaret Harrell on Armed Services on Armed Services United States Senate United States Senate Raymond Johns Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 F. Whitten Peters The Honorable Howard McKeon The Honorable Adam Smith Bud Wyatt Chairman, Committee Ranking Member, Committee on Armed Services on Armed Services United States House of United States House of Representatives Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. President, Chairmen and Ranking Members: The National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force is pleased to submit its report of findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the legislative and administrative actions we believe will enable the Air Force to best fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements in the challenging years ahead. In conducting the work that led to our report, the Commission held numerous open hearings in Washington and at Air Force installations and cities throughout the nation. We heard formal and informal testimony from Air Force leaders of many ranks; from the men and women serving in the ranks of all three components of the Air Force; from Governors, Senators, Representatives, and local officials; and from Air Force retirees and private citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Air Bases in an Age of Insurgency
    AIR UNIVERSITY Defending Air Bases in an Age of Insurgency Shannon W. Caudill Colonel, USAF Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Caudill, Shannon W. Copy Editor Sandi Davis Defending air bases in an age of insurgency / Shannon W. Caudill, Colonel, USAF. Cover Art pages cm Daniel Armstrong Includes bibliographical references and index. Book Design and Illustrations ISBN 978-1-58566-241-8 L. Susan Fair 1. Air bases—Security measures—United States. 2. United States. Air Force—Security measures. Composition and Prepress Production 3. Irregular warfare—United States. I. Title. Vivian D. O’Neal UG634.49.C48 2014 Print Preparation and Distribution 358.4'14—dc23 Diane Clark 2014012026 Published by Air University Press in May 2014 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Disclaimer Editor in Chief Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed Oreste M. Johnson or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of Managing Editor the organizations with which they are associated or the Demorah Hayes views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, Design and Production Manager United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any Cheryl King other US government agency. This publication is cleared for public release and unlimited distribution. Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ AFRI Air Force Research Institute ii This book is dedicated to all Airmen and their joint comrades who have served in harm’s way to defend air bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Guests, We Extend to You a Very Warm Welcome to Wright-Patterson Inns
    Dear Guests, We extend to you a very warm welcome to Wright-Patterson Inns. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and the surrounding community are proud to be the birthplace of aviation and continues to be a leader in aeronautical, and astronautical engineering innovations. The area has a perfect balance of history and culture with a modern-day flair. We are delighted with the opportunity to have you as our guest. If there is anything we can do for you, please do not hesitate to contact me or the guest services desk. We hope you have a memorable and productive stay with us. Sincerely, Janelle Bailey Lodging Manager Air Force Inns Promise The Air Force Inns Promise: “Our goal is to provide you a clean, comfortable room to guarantee a good night’s rest and pleasant stay. If any part of your stay with us is not satisfactory, please provide the lodging manager or front desk staff an opportunity to ‘make it right’.” Our Mission To provide legendary customer service and top-quality accommodations to our war fighters and their families! Welcome to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Table of Contents • General Information • Emergency & Security • Emergency Facilities • Safe Instructions • Lodging Information • Frequently Asked Questions • Telephone & Internet Information • Force Support & Base Facilities • Jogging/Base/Area Maps • Dining Information • Area Attractions • TV/Radio Information • Transportation • History/Biographies General Information ATM Locations: * The Club - Inside main lobby * Hospital - Inside atrium * Wright-Patterson Credit Union- Area A by commissary Energy Conservation: * The federal government is the largest energy user in the United States, and it has led the way in energy conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Air Force Base, Uses a Design Group on Base to Design Defense Strategy
    PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TULLAHOMA TN Vol. 67, No. 3 Arnold AFB, Tenn. PERMIT NO. 29 February 3, 2020 Arnold AFB craftsmen and others join to aid supersonic wind tunnel return to service By Bradley Hicks measurement system of the resur- AEDC Public Affairs rected 16-foot supersonic wind tunnel. The reactivation of the 16-foot The wind tunnel known as supersonic wind tunnel at Arnold 16S, the largest supersonic wind Air Force Base is on the horizon, tunnel in the world, has been dor- and work continues behind the mant for more than 20 years. It scenes to bring the dormant facil- was listed as inactive in the late ity back to life. 1990s as national priorities shifted Craftsmen in the Arnold AFB and usage of the facility declined. Model and Machine Shop are be- The reactivation of 16S is ing lauded for the creativity and set to occur before the end of cohesion that led to the successful the year. Paul Wright, Air Force completion of a significant under- project manager for the return to taking critical to reactivating the service project, said the revived facility. facility will fill a crucial need. “It was a lot of teamwork,” said Due to a reduction in the number Amy Duncan, Test Operations and of supersonic wind tunnels in the Sustainment contract project engi- U.S. over the past two decades, neer for the Flight Systems Branch 16S will provide test capabilities at Arnold AFB. “Lots of workers that cannot be found anywhere came up with ideas to save mon- else in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Was a Key Strategic Decision
    Welcome Letter Dear Community Leader: When we started the Dayton Region Community Leader Washington Fly-In more than three decades ago, we never imagined a global pandemic like COVID-19 would shut down daily life and keep us from gathering in D.C. In the Dayton Region, our strength has always been our ability to collaborate, our willing- ness to innovate, and our drive to get things done. In that spirit, we decided to adapt this year’s Fly-In into a virtual format. Even with the limitations of social distancing, we have the resilience and flexibility to continue our unbroken Fly-In tradition. We take great pride in how business, government, academia, and the non-profit sector come together to support our region and “speak with one voice.” We see the Fly-In as this collaborative idea come to life. When our community leaders converge on Washington, it sends a powerful message. That unity and strength is even more important as we face the current situation. We may not be able to connect in person, but we can still send a powerful message. When the DDC began 25 years ago, supporting Wright-Patterson Air Force Base was a key strategic decision. We’ve seen the base’s workforce grow significantly in that time and increase contracts with local companies. We remain focused on the Dayton Region’s federal installations, including the Springfield Air National Guard Base and the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center in addition to Wright-Patt. These installations have a combined regional annual economic impact of more than $16 billion and represent stable generators of jobs and economic development even during difficult times.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 USAF Almanac
    May 2013/$8 May 2013 USAF Almanac AIR FORCE MAGAZINE MAY 2013 ALMANAC WWW.AIRFORCEMAG.COM Sensing Effects C4I Training & Logistics Cyber MISSION: MODERNIZE WITHOUT COMPROMISE Raytheon’s drop-in, plug-and-play technology is turning older aircraft into cutting-edge fi ghters, allowing countries to maximize their fl eets even in a time of tighter budgets. By enhancing pilot awareness and empowering platforms, we’re enabling tomorrow’s missions, today. See how RACR is bringing plug-and-play, state-of-the-art performance to today’s fi ghter jets at: Raytheon.com © 2013 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company. 13SAS243_MISSIONModern_AFAlam_May2013.indd 1 3/21/13 11:40 AM Sensing Effects C4I Training & Logistics Cyber MISSION: MODERNIZE WITHOUT COMPROMISE Raytheon’s drop-in, plug-and-play technology is turning older aircraft into cutting-edge fi ghters, allowing countries to maximize their fl eets even in a time of tighter budgets. By enhancing pilot awareness and empowering platforms, we’re enabling tomorrow’s missions, today. See how RACR is bringing plug-and-play, state-of-the-art performance to today’s fi ghter jets at: Raytheon.com © 2013 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company. 13SAS243_MISSIONModern_AFAlam_May2013.indd 1 3/21/13 11:40 AM 2013 USAF Almanac May 2013, Vol. 96, No. 5 May 2013, Vol. 96, No. 5 6 Editorial: How to Lose a Sprint and a Marathon Publisher By Adam J. Hebert Craig R. McKinley Under sequestration, readiness is no longer assured.
    [Show full text]