Defending Air Bases in an Age of Insurgency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Defending Air Bases in an Age of Insurgency AIR UNIVERSITY Defending Air Bases in an Age of Insurgency Shannon W. Caudill Colonel, USAF Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Caudill, Shannon W. Copy Editor Sandi Davis Defending air bases in an age of insurgency / Shannon W. Caudill, Colonel, USAF. Cover Art pages cm Daniel Armstrong Includes bibliographical references and index. Book Design and Illustrations ISBN 978-1-58566-241-8 L. Susan Fair 1. Air bases—Security measures—United States. 2. United States. Air Force—Security measures. Composition and Prepress Production 3. Irregular warfare—United States. I. Title. Vivian D. O’Neal UG634.49.C48 2014 Print Preparation and Distribution 358.4'14—dc23 Diane Clark 2014012026 Published by Air University Press in May 2014 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Disclaimer Editor in Chief Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed Oreste M. Johnson or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of Managing Editor the organizations with which they are associated or the Demorah Hayes views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, Design and Production Manager United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any Cheryl King other US government agency. This publication is cleared for public release and unlimited distribution. Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ AFRI Air Force Research Institute ii This book is dedicated to all Airmen and their joint comrades who have served in harm’s way to defend air bases. Colonel Caudill’s anthology on base defense and counterinsurgency has broad implica- tions for use by the joint and Total Force community that would have a lasting impact for our warriors. From my foxhole, the Air Force is making an enormous contribution to a much-needed dialogue on these critical subject areas. —Maj Gen Peter Aylward, Army National Guard, retired, former deputy commanding general, Iraq Security Forces at Multi-National Corps and special assistant to the chief of the National Guard Bureau ****** The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have proven the adaptability of Airmen in conflict, particularly in the area of air base defense. This book captures the lessons of those con- flicts for the defense of air assets in a counterinsurgency environment. The authors have done the Air Force and joint community a service in examining and challenging the tenets of base defense and their future. —Maj Gen Mary Kay Hertog, USAF, retired, former director of Security Forces, Headquarters US Air Force, director of the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office ****** Americans, especially Airmen, do not like fighting irregular warfare and are tempted to write such campaigns off as anomalies so they can return to conventional campaigns, with which they are much more comfortable. This book is an important part of the in- tellectual preparation needed for future irregular warfare campaigns, illustrating how to create the stable operating environment needed for air operations through sound air base defense practices. —Dr. William T. Dean III, associate professor of comparative military studies and counterinsurgency scholar, Air University’s Air Command and Staff College ****** I am thrilled that Air University Press has invested in this anthology that adds to the history of base defense and provides guideposts to future leaders charged with defend- ing air operations in complex environments. —Brig Gen Allen J. Jamerson, USAF, director of Security Forces, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Installations, and Mission Support, Headquarters US Air Force ****** Counterinsurgency and irregular warfare must become part of our security forces train- ing if we expect to succeed in future conflicts. Lessons learned from the Iraqi and Af- ghan wars are critical to preparing the security forces career field for such future chal- lenges. Research conducted by leaders with practical experience in base defense operations will only improve our preparations. —Brig Gen Jimmy McMillian, USAF, retired, former director of Security Forces, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Installations, and Mission Support, Headquarters US Air Force iv Contents List of Illustrations vii Foreword ix About the Authors xiii Acknowledgments xxi Introduction xxv Shannon W. Caudill PART 1 HISTORICAL AND INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES 1 A Short History of Air Base Defense: From World War I to Iraq 3 Erik K. Rundquist 2 A Canadian Perspective on Air Base Ground Defense: Ad Hoc Is Not Good Enough 43 Paul M. Thobo-Carlsen 3 Air Support for Base Defense: Lessons for the Noncontiguous Battlefield 111 Robert D. Sagraves PART 2 CASE STUDY—BALAD AIR BASE, IRAQ 4 Defending the Joint Force: Lessons Learned from Joint Base Balad 199 Shannon W. Caudill, Anthony M. Packard, and Raymund M. Tembreull 5 The Defense of Joint Base Balad: An Analysis 217 Joseph A. Milner v CONTENTS PART 3 THERE IS NO “REAR AREA”: CHANGES TO AIR BASE DEFENSE IN A COUNTERINSURGENCY ENVIRONMENT 6 The Air Force’s New Ground War: Ensuring Projection of Air and Space Power through Expeditionary Security Operations 245 Robert H. “Bob” Holmes, Bradley D. Spacy, John M. Busch, and Gregory J. Reese 7 Sharpening the Eagle’s Talons: Assessing Advances in Air Base Defense Doctrine 263 David P. Briar 8 Setting the Right Glide Slope: Preparing the Air Force for the Next Counterinsurgency Campaign 281 Paul J. Kasuda PART 4 ORGANIZING FOR THE FUTURE 9 Nowhere to Hide: The Growing Threat to Air Bases 303 Shannon W. Caudill and Benjamin Jacobson 10 Law Enforcement and Base Defense: Improving Interoperability to Benefit the War Fighter 319 Shannon W. Caudill and Bryan A. Keeling 11 Conclusion: Ten Propositions on the Defense of Air Bases 339 Shannon W. Caudill and Christopher L. Corley Afterword 367 Dr. William T. Dean III Abbreviations 373 Bibliography 381 Index 411 vi Illustrations Figures 1.1 Distributed area defense doctrine 17 2.1 Airfield attack objectives, 1940–1992 52 2.2 Air base attack tactics, 1940–1992 52 2.3 Standoff weapon footprints 56 2.4 RAF Regiment field squadron organization 75 2.5 Objektschutzregiment der Luftwaffe organization 79 2.6 RAAF airfield defense squadron organization 82 4.1 Comparison of attacks on Joint Base Balad to those on all US air bases in the Vietnam theater 203 5.1 JBB with named areas of interest depicted around the installation 222 5.2 332nd ESFG organizational chart 223 5.3 Number of rounds fired per attack in Vietnam 232 5.4 Number of rounds fired per attack at JBB 232 5.5 Median monthly attacks and attack intervals 235 on Joint Base Balad 5.6 Increasing insurgent miss distance as captured by the warning system 235 5.7 Power law (number=450*[days]-1.087) of deterred attack intervals 237 5.8 Medians give stable attack interval trends, and averages give increasing errors of attack intervals 238 vii CONTENTS 6.1 Emerging joint nonlinear battlefield 250 6.2 Notional base boundary 251 6.3 Notional area of interest and base boundary 252 6.4 Typical BDOC organization 253 6.5 Proposed Air Force battle stations 256 8.1 JBB COIN synchronization structure 294 8.2 332nd AEW organization structure 295 Tables 2.1 Deployable air force platforms and support elements 49 2.2 Typical standoff weapons 54 2.3 Nonstate groups with MANPADS, 1996–2001 55 2.4 AIRCOM risk severity map for FY 06/07 57 2.5 Relative size of allied air force ground-defense forces 99 viii Foreword This century will be characterized by a volatile international po- litical environment, persistent conflict, and internal strife. Regional tensions will continue to create uncertainty, resulting in political dy- namics ripe for civil war, political upheaval, sectarian violence, and insurgency. This is the environment in which we will conduct air op- erations for decades to come; as such, leaders will have to understand the complexity of the situation and how best to influence the battle- space adjacent to air bases. To prepare for future contingencies and enable air operations, the Air Force must grow new air base defense leaders and build capabili- ties that rapidly adapt to crises, especially in an ever-evolving, asym- metric operational environment. There are three components to im- proving base defense operations in such uncertain circumstances. First, we must develop leaders who understand and are competent in the craft of base defense in varying environments. Second, we must invest in innovative and rapidly deployable base defense assets and technologies that are also adaptable to the changing operational envi- ronment. And third, we must advocate integrated defense concepts to all Airmen and joint/coalition personnel. Producing leaders who can create and lead “learning” organiza- tions capable of adapting to the dynamics of a constantly changing irregular warfare environment is critical to enable airpower in fu- ture contingencies. This requires mentorship of subordinates, self- development through studying counterinsurgency (COIN) and other publications on irregular warfare, and creating an environment of trust and smart risk-taking up and down the chain of command. As I write this, we are still fully involved in finishing important work in Afghanistan. We must invest our time in creating leaders at all levels that are not only tactically proficient but also judicious and intelligent in restraining the application of combat power in order to gain and maintain trust with the local populations surrounding American and allied air bases. In addition to cultivating smart, adaptable leaders, we also need to develop competent tactical leaders capable of defending air bases in these uncertain environments. Small-unit leadership has been and will continue to be the cornerstone of tactical effectiveness.
Recommended publications
  • Soldiers and Veterans Against the War
    Vietnam Generation Volume 2 Number 1 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Article 1 Against the War 1-1990 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Against the War Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation (1990) "GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Against the War," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol2/iss1/1 This Complete Volume is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GI RESISTANCE: S o l d ie r s a n d V e t e r a n s AGAINST THE WAR Victim am Generation Vietnam Generation was founded in 1988 to promote and encourage interdisciplinary study of the Vietnam War era and the Vietnam War generation. The journal is published by Vietnam Generation, Inc., a nonprofit corporation devoted to promoting scholarship on recent history and contemporary issues. ViETNAM G en eratio n , In c . ViCE-pRESidENT PRESidENT SECRETARY, TREASURER Herman Beavers Kali Tal Cindy Fuchs Vietnam G eneration Te c HnIc a I A s s is t a n c e EdiTOR: Kali Tal Lawrence E. Hunter AdvisoRy BoARd NANCY ANISFIELD MICHAEL KLEIN RUTH ROSEN Champlain College University of Ulster UC Davis KEVIN BOWEN GABRIEL KOLKO WILLIAM J. SEARLE William Joiner Center York University Eastern Illinois University University of Massachusetts JACQUELINE LAWSON JAMES C.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Liberation Army Air Force Aviation Training at the Operational
    C O R P O R A T I O N From Theory to Practice People’s Liberation Army Air Force Aviation Training at the Operational Unit Lyle J. Morris, Eric Heginbotham For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1415 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9497-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface About the China Aerospace Studies Institute The China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) was created in 2014 at the initiative of the Headquarters, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Commander and the Law – 2019
    THE MILITARY • 2019 COMMANDER AND THE THE LAW MILITARY THE MILITARY COMMANDER AND THE LAW TE G OCA ENE DV RA A L E ’S G S D C H U J O E O H L T U N E C IT R E D FO S R TATES AI The Military Commander and the Law is a publication of The Judge Advocate General’s School. This publication is used as a deskbook for instruction at various commander courses at Air University. It also serves as a helpful reference guide for commanders in the field, providing general guidance and helping commanders to clarify issues and identify potential problem areas. Disclaimer: As with any publication of secondary authority, this deskbook should not be used as the basis for action on specific cases. Primary authority, much of which is cited in this edition, should first be carefully reviewed. Finally, this deskbook does not serve as a substitute for advice from the staff judge advocate. Editorial Note: This edition was edited and published during the Secretary of the Air Force’s Air Force Directive Publication Reduction initiative. Therefore, many of the primary authorities cited in this edition may have been rescinded, consolidated, or superseded since publication. It is imperative that all authorities cited herein be first verified for currency on https://www.e-publishing.af.mil/. Readers with questions or comments concerning this publication should contact the editors of The Military Commander and the Law at the following address: The Judge Advocate General’s School 150 Chennault Circle (Bldg 694) Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6418 Comm.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicals and Recurring Documents
    PERIODICALS AND RECURRING DOCUMENTS May 2012 Legend A ANNUAL S-M SEMI-MONTHLY D DAILY BI-M BI-MONTHLY W WEEKLY Q QUARTERLY BI-W BI-WEEKLY TRI-A TRI-ANNUAL M MONTHLY IRR IRREGULAR S-A SEMI-ANNUAL A ACADEME. (BI-M) 1985-1989 ACADEMY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. PROCEEDINGS. (IRR) 1960-1991 (MFILM 1975-1980) (MFICHE 1981-1982) ACQUISITION REVIEW QUARTERLY. (Q) 1994-2003 CONTINUED BY DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL. AD ASTRA-TO THE STARS. (M) 1989-1992 ADA. (Q) 1991-1997 FORMERLY AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY. ADF: AFRICA DEFENSE FORUM. (Q) 2008- ADVANCE. (A) 1986-1994 ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. SEE S.A.M. ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. ADVISOR. (Q) 1974-1978 FORMERLY JOURNAL OF NAVY CIVILIAN MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. ADVOCATE. (BI-M) 1982-1984 - 1 - AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1977-1978 CONTINUED BY AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1979-1986 FORMERLY AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. AEROSPACE. (Q) 1963-1987 AEROSPACE AMERICA. (M) 1984-1998 FORMERLY ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE SCIENCE. (Q) 1990-1991 FORMERLY DEFENSE SCIENCE. AEROSPACE HISTORIAN. (Q) 1965-1988 FORMERLY AIRPOWER HISTORIAN. CONTINUED BY AIR POWER HISTORY. AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL. (BI-M) 1967-1981 FORMERLY AIR FORCE SPACE DIGEST INTERNATIONAL. AEROSPACE MEDICINE. (M) 1973-1974 CONTINUED BY AVIATION SPACE AND EVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE. AEROSPACE POWER JOURNAL. (Q) 1999-2002 FORMERLY AIRPOWER JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL. AEROSPACE SAFETY. (M) 1976-1980 AFRICA REPORT. (BI-M) 1967-1995 (MFICHE 1979-1994) AFRICA TODAY. (Q) 1963-1990; (MFICHE 1979-1990) 1999-2007 AFRICAN SECURITY. (Q) 2010- AGENDA. (M) 1978-1982 AGORA.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th SOPS to Schriever: Bring It On! Easter Services Available the 50Th Space Wing by Staff Sgt
    Spring Fling: egg-citing! More than 1,200 people came out to enjoy the 2007 Spring Fling, which featured a petting zoo, egg scrambles and more. See story and photos on pages 12 and 13. VOL. 9, NO. 14 April 5, 2007 Colorado Springs, Colo. www.schriever.af.mil News Briefs 4th SOPS to Schriever: Bring it on! Easter services available The 50th Space Wing by Staff Sgt. Don Branum Chaplain Support Team 50th Space Wing Public Affairs will conduct a Good Friday worship service Friday at 11 The challenge is on again—who can come a.m. and an Easter Sunday in “fourth”? service Sunday at 8 a.m. in The 4th Space Operations Squadron has the Building 300 Audito- invited everyone on base to take part in the rium here. second-annual 4-Fit Challenge, scheduled for For information on these April 27 at 9:44 a.m. at the Main Fitness Center or other religious ser- and track here. vices, contact the 50th SW The numerology behind the date and time Chaplain Support Team at is signifi cant: April 27 is the fourth Friday of 567-3705. the fourth month. The time corresponds to 4:44 a.m. in the Yankee Time Zone, just east of the Build your relationship International Date Line. Fourth place is the new The Schriever Airman fi rst place; other spots are fi rst, second and third and Family Readiness runners-up. Center, in partnership with This year’s events include a men’s and wom- the Peterson Air Force Base en’s 4x400m relay as well as a 4x1600m coed Spouses Club, will offer two relay.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Inherent Resolve Lead Inspector General Report to the United States Congress
    OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS JANUARY 1, 2021–MARCH 31, 2021 FRONT MATTER ABOUT THIS REPORT A 2013 amendment to the Inspector General Act established the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations and requires that the Lead IG submit quarterly reports to the U.S. Congress on each active operation. The Chair of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency designated the DoD Inspector General (IG) as the Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for the operation. The USAID IG participates in oversight of the operation. The Offices of Inspector General (OIG) of the DoD, the DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OIR. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out the Lead IG statutory responsibilities to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the U.S. Government in support of the operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, investigations, or evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the operation and on activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, the DoS, USAID, and other Federal agencies about OIR and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from other sources, including official documents, congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Integration of Swedish and Dutch Forces in EU Naval Force Operation Atalanta, 2015
    In 2015, the Netherlands and Sweden provided a joint contri- bution to the EU’s counter-piracy military mission EUNAVFOR Operation Atalanta. During their three-month deployment to the area of operation, Swedish troops and enablers – including two Combat Boat 90 assault craft and two AW109 helicopters – were stationed on board the Dutch warship HNLMS Johan de Witt, which also hosted the Force Headquarters (FHQ) led by a Swedish Admiral. This kind of cooperation, in particular having a tactical headquarters led by one nation and the fl agship led by another, was quite unique. In general, the integration was considered to have been suc- cessful – to some extent surprisingly so. This report describes and analyses the planning and execution of the fusion of Dutch and Swedish forces, identifying key lessons that may be of value in similar future collaborations. National regulations and procedures, command and control structures, preparatory training and exercises, the chosen level of integration and per- sonal mindsets are among the issues discussed. Bilateral Partnership on an Even Keel The Integration of Swedish and Dutch Forces in EU Naval Force Operation Atalanta, 2015 David Harriman and Kristina Zetterlund FOI-R--4101--SE ISSN1650-1942 www.foi.se September 2015 David Harriman and Kristina Zetterlund Bilateral Partnership on an Even Keel The Integration of Swedish and Dutch Forces in EU Naval Force Operation Atalanta, 2015 Bild/Cover: Mattias Nurmela, COMBATCAMERA, Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten) FOI-R--4101--SE Titel Bilateralt samarbete på rätt köl – Svenska och nederländska styrkors integrering i EU Naval Force Operation Atalanta, 2015 Title Bilateral Partnership on an Even Keel – The Integration of Swedish and Dutch Forces in EU Naval Force Operation Atalanta, 2015 Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--4101--SE Månad/Month September Utgivningsår/Year 2015 Antal sidor/Pages 70 ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet/Ministry of Defence Forskningsområde 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Air Division Memorial Library Film Catalogue
    2nd Air Division 2nd Air Division Memorial Library Film Catalogue May 2015 2nd Air Division Memorial Library Film and Audio Collection Catalogue This catalogue lists the CDs, DVDs (section one) and videos (section two) in the Memorial Library’s film and audio collection. You can also find these listed in Norfolk Libraries online catalogue at http://www.norfolk.spydus.co.uk • Most items in the collection are not available for loan. • Films can be viewed in the Memorial Library Meeting Room during library opening hours (Mon to Sat 9am - 5pm). As the room can be booked for meetings, school visits etc, it is advisable to contact us in advance to book the room. • Films can be shown to groups and organisations by arrangement. Please contact the library for further details. 2nd Air Division Memorial Library The Forum Millennium Plain Norwich NR2 1AW Phone (01603) 774747 Email [email protected] . MEMORIAL LIBRARY CD S AND DVD S 1. “Troublemaker” A Pilot’s Story of World War II 466 th Bomb Group (Attlebridge) Robert W Harrington, B24 Pilot (2 copies) 2. Evade! Evasion Experiences of American Aircrews in World war II 54 minutes 3. D-Day to Berlin Acclaimed Film Maker’s World War II Chronicle 4. Cambridge American Cemetery & Memorial 5. My Heroes (445 th Bomb Group) 6. Tibenham – AAF Station 124: A Pictorial History 1943-1945 (445 th Bomb Group) Slides and sound files with word document: does not play on DVD player. Can be viewed on public PCs. (2 copies) 7. A Trip to Norwich Ret. Major John L Sullivan, Bombardier/Navigator, 93 rd BG (Hardwick) 2nd ADA’s 54 th Annual Convention in Norwich November 2001 (Contains archive footage of WWII) 1 hour (2 copies) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The
    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2007 Unfunded Priority List (UPL)
    FY 2007 Unfunded Priority List (UPL) Feb 2006 SAF/FMB POC Budget and Appropriations Liaison Office (703) 614-8110 FY 2007 UNFUNDED PRIORITY LIST INDEX FY2007 UNFUNDED PRIORITY LIST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................. 4 NARRATIVES FOR TOP 16 PRIORITIES 1. National Defense Airlift Fund Capability Upgrades................................................ 10 2. AFSOC Predator.................................................................................................... 13 3. A-10 Modifications ................................................................................................. 16 4. Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) ............................................. 21 5. Armored Security Vehicles .................................................................................... 34 6. M-4 Carbine........................................................................................................... 37 7. SNIPER Pod Procurement and Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP) Research .......... 41 8. Guardian Angel Combat Equipment ...................................................................... 45 9. ICBM Security Modernization ................................................................................ 49 10. Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) - Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)......................... 53 11. AF Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Emergency Response ........................ 56 12. B-1/B-52 Deployable Phase Maintenance Kits ...................................................... 61 13. B-2 Satellite
    [Show full text]