Education for Income Generation Project (EIG)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Final Evaluation Report Education for Income Generation Project (EIG) November 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Population, Health and Development Group. i FINAL EVALUATION REPORT EDUCATION FOR INCOME GENERATION (EIG) PROJECT November 2013 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ii Acknowledgements The Evaluation Team expresses gratitude to USAID/Nepal for providing the opportunity to evaluate “Final Performance Evaluation of USAID/Nepal’s Education for Income Generation (EIG) Program". The team would like to thank Director Mr. John Stamm, General Development Office, USAID/Nepal. The team would like to express its gratitude to Ms. Anita Mahat Rana - the POC for "EIG Final Evaluation", for her patience in beautifully steering the team and providing guidance. The evaluation team would like to thank the other officials of USAID/Nepal Mr. Gautam Bajracharya, DPA; Mr. Indra Saran K.C., Geographic Information System Specialist; Mr. Murari Adhikari, Evaluation Officer, Mr. Ajaya Parajuli, Acquisition and Assistance Agent, Office of Acquisition & Assistance and Ms. Nitu Ghimire for their valuable suggestions and comments during the course of carrying the evaluation work. The team would like to thank the EIG/Winrock team including Mr. Praveen Baidya, Deputy COP, Mr. Ajay Nanda Bajracharya, Manager, agricultural productivity and income generation, Mr. Uttam Dhakal, Manager, vocational training, Mr. Rabindra Patel, Manager, literacy program and Ms. Zarina Amatya Pradhan, M&E specialist/communication for their continued support throughout the evaluation period in Kathmandu and in field visits. The evaluation team would like to thank all EIG implementing partners of the centre and districts and district level government line agencies for their time in taking part in interviews/interactions with the evaluation team members. Their inputs to the evaluation work have been useful. Finally over 800 program beneficiaries who spared their time and sat with field researchers discussing about different aspects of the program have been very valuable to accomplish the objectives of the evaluation and without their patience and support the work would not have been possible. The team would like to express sincere thanks to all those who have assisted directly or indirectly. EIG Evaluation Team Dr. Yagya Bahadur Karki, Team Leader Dr. Tara Nath Pande, Team Member, Agricultural Specialist Mr. Bhoj Raj Neupane, Vocational Training Specialist Mr. Khadga B. Karki, Project/Logistics Manager Ms. Smritee Bajracharya, Gender and Health i Abbreviations and Acronyms C1 Component 1 C2 Component 2 C3 Component 3 CDCS Country Development and Cooperation Strategy CEAPRED Center for Environmental and Agricultural Policy Research, Extension and Development CTEVT Council for Technical Education and Vocational Training DADO District Agriculture Development Officer DCC District Coordination Committee DEO District Education Officer DEPROSC Development Project Service Centre DLSO District Livestock Services Office EIG Education for Income Generation FGD Focus Group Discussion FNCCI Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry FtF Feed the Future HHs Households HIV/AIDS Human Immuno-deficiency Virus/ Acquired Immuno-deficiency syndrome IDE International Development Enterprises INGO International Non Government Organization JTA Junior Technical Assistance KIRDARC Karnali Integrated Rural Development and Research Centre LDO Local Development Office LSP Local Service Provider MDGs Millennium Development Goals MWDR Mid Western Development Region NAC National Advisory Committee NGO Non Governmental Organization NSTB National Skill Testing Board OJT On the Job Training PHDG Population, Health and Development Group PSU Primary Sampling Unit RFP Request for Proposal RMA Rapid Market Assessment ROI Return on Investment RUSUF Rural Society Upliftment Forum SAPROS Support Activities for Poor Producers of Nepal SD Standard Deviation SLC School Leaving Certificate TOT Training of Trainers TEPP Training and Employment Placement Provider TTP Technical Training Provider TYIP Three Year Interim Plan UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization USAID United State Agency for International Development VDC Village Development Committee WHO World Health Organization WI Winrock International ii Executive Summary Purpose: The primary purpose of the final evaluation of EIG program was to assess its effectiveness to achieve sustainable impacts on beneficiaries especially with regard to employment and incomes and provide guidance to USAID in future program designs. The evaluation has focused on four components namely, literacy (Component 1 or C1), vocational (Component 2 or C2), agricultural productivity and enterprises (Component 3 or C3) and scholarship to Dalit (Component 4 or C4 ). Background: USAID/Nepal supported Education for Income Generation (EIG)Program was a five-year (2008-2012), $14.7 million program designed to respond to a root cause of conflict— exclusion of disadvantaged youth from relevant education, training and employment opportunities. The program combined literacy and life skills education; technical and vocational training linked to employment; training to increase agricultural productivity and raise rural incomes; and targeted scholarships for disadvantaged Dalit youth to increase access to higher (10+2 and college certificate) education. A cross-cutting theme was the provision of peace and reconciliation education for all participants in order to develop the knowledge, attitudes and skills for conflict resolution, peace building, and promotion of human rights. EIG‘s primary beneficiaries were disadvantaged, conflict-affected and internally displaced youth throughout the 15 districts of the Mid-Western Region of Nepal. The goal of the EIG project was to increase youth's access to education and training for income generation and employment. Its major objectives were to increase literacy, vocational skills, agricultural productions and enterprise skills of disadvantaged youth. The program focused on areas historically prone to conflict and interethnic tensions. Overall, the project provided literacy and numeracy skills to 8,792 youth (8,374 females and 418 males), vocational skills to 11,521 (5,667 females and 5,854 males), agricultural productivity and entrepreneurship skills to 54,183 youth (44,158 females and 10,025 males), and scholarships to 421 (194 females and 227 males) Dalit youth. Evaluation questions: This final evaluation has focused on all four components and has been framed in order to answer the six key evaluation questions namely; how well the EIG approach increased disadvantaged youth's access to employment and incomes? How have literacy, numeracy and entrepreneurship skills enhanced women's empowerment and increased agricultural productivity? How relevant was vocational education program to the short, middle, and long-term development needs of Nepal? What were the key challenges to the project? What are the prospects for sustainability of the end results produced and how effective was the program in building the capacity of Nepali organizations. Methodology: In order to assess the EIG program a sample survey of beneficiaries was designed. A sample of beneficiaries from among the total beneficiaries of 74,496 from 15 program districts was drawn. A standard formula was used to estimate sample size and 600 households was determined as sample size but the number of beneficiaries of different types was about 800 individuals. Six districts were randomly chosen to interview 800 beneficiaries. To address the six evaluation questions six different methods/approaches such as desk review, interview with stakeholders/implementers, meetings, FGDs with beneficiaries, interviews with beneficiaries in households and case studies were used. Appropriate tools/checklists/ questionnaires were developed and administered by field researchers and senior evaluators in all six districts and in Kathmandu. The evaluation report includes information analyzed using iii primary and secondary data of the project. In addition, quantitative data collected by interviewing 803 beneficiaries in their homes (240 literacy and numeracy class attendees, 98 vocational trainees, 422 agricultural productivity and enterprise class attendees and 43 Dalit scholarship recipients) have been analyzed. The findings have been enriched by analyzing qualitative information collected by conducting in-depth interviews with key implementing partners, focus group discussions with beneficiaries, and collecting case studies of beneficiaries. Findings: The evaluation study shows that the EIG program approach was innovative; it linked basic literacy with life skills and agricultural entrepreneurship and productivity leading to employment and income generation. Vocational training program was unique as it entailed training providers to find employment for trainees unlike other general trainings. Furthermore EIG program leveraged resources (about $1.4 million) for infrastructure and capacity building activities. The program was integrated; it initially provided basic literacy and numeracy skills to disadvantaged farmers, arranged services and resources to increase agricultural productivity and promoted marketing of products for income generation.