DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetland Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetland Assessment WETLAND ASSESSMENT WESTERN MARGIN GAP WEST PROJECT, BOTHAVILLE, FREE STATE PROVINCE February 2018 Report prepared by: ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CONSULTING ERC forms part of Benah Con cc cc registration no: 2005/044901/23 Postal address: PO Box 20640, Noordbrug, 2522 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: 082 789 4669 Fax: 086 621 4843 Report Reference: SH2018-04 Report author: A.R. Götze ( Pr.Sci.Nat. ) Wetland Assessment: Western Margin Gap West TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 5 2 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND SUMMARY OF EXPERTISE OF SPECIALIST INVESTIGATOR ................................................................. 11 2.1 Declaration of independence ............................................................ 11 2.2 Summary of expertise ....................................................................... 12 3 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 13 3.1 Scope of work ................................................................................... 14 3.2 Assumptions and Limitations ............................................................ 14 3.3 Methodology ..................................................................................... 15 3.4 Legislative and policy frameworks and definitions ............................ 16 4 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................. 20 4.1 General Description .......................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Highveld Alluvial Vegetation (AZa5) ........................................... 21 4.2 Surface hydrology ............................................................................. 22 4.3 Wetland vegetation ........................................................................... 25 4.4 Wetland soils .................................................................................... 28 4.4.1 Soil forms ................................................................................... 28 4.4.2 Soil wetness indicators ............................................................... 32 5 WETLAND DELINEATION ..................................................................... 34 6 PRESENT ECOLOGICAL STATUS (PES) ............................................. 38 6.1 PES methodology ............................................................................. 38 6.2 PES of wetlands in the study area .................................................... 40 7 ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE AND SENSITIVITY (EIS) ....................... 40 7.1 EIS methodology .............................................................................. 40 7.2 EIS of wetlands in the study area ..................................................... 43 8 WETLAND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (ES) ............................................ 43 8.1 ES methodology ............................................................................... 43 8.2 ES of wetlands in the study area ...................................................... 44 9 CONSERVATION STATUS OF LOCAL ECOSYSTEMS........................ 45 10 HABITAT SENSITIVITY ....................................................................... 48 11 WETLAND REHABILITATION AND MANAGEMENT .......................... 53 11.1 Rehabilitation Principles ................................................................ 53 11.2 Rehabilitation Management ........................................................... 54 11.3 Rehabilitation Recommendations .................................................. 55 12 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...................................................................... 56 12.1 Impact rating and mitigation........................................................... 56 12.2 Assessment of the no-go alternative ............................................. 58 12.3 Monitoring requirements ................................................................ 58 13 FINAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................. 59 14 REFERENCES..................................................................................... 60 14.1 Literature sighted in this report ...................................................... 60 14.2 Other Literature and Field Guides Consulted ................................ 61 2 ERC: A.R. Götze – February 2018 – SH201804 Wetland Assessment: Western Margin Gap West LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Google earth image indicating the regional setting of the study area. ................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 2: Google earth image indicating the local setting of the study area. .. 14 Figure 3: Distribution of vegetation types in and around the study area according to Mucina and Rutherford (2006). ........................................... 20 Figure 4: Water Management Areas of Central and Northern South Africa. 22 Figure 5: Quaternary Catchment Areas of the study area (red polygon) and surroundings. .......................................................................................... 22 Figure 6: Image depicting the rivers, wetlands and other drainage lines recorded in the study area (red polygon). ............................................... 24 Figure 7: A section of the riparian zone on the banks of the Vals River. ....... 26 Figure 8: A section of riparian zone of the Vaal River. .................................. 26 Figure 9: A section of the unnamed drainage line and vegetation associated with the unchanneled valley bottom wetland along its course through the study area. .............................................................................................. 27 Figure 10: A seepage wetland in the study area. .......................................... 27 Figure 11: A dry man-made dam that is situated in a natural fold in the landscape of the northern part of the study area. ................................... 28 Figure 12: Katspruit soil form photographed in the permanent zone of a wetland. .................................................................................................. 29 Figure 13: Kroonstad soil form in a seasonal wetland zone. ......................... 30 Figure 14: Sepane soil form in the temporal zone of a drainage line. ........... 30 Figure 15: A Rensburg soil form in an eroded temporary zone. .................... 31 Figure 16: A Tukulu soil form in floodplain area. ........................................... 31 Figure 17: A Pinedene soil form in a temporary zone of a seepage wetland. 32 Figure 18: Low chroma grey matrix and sesquioxide mottles in the subsoil of a Sepane soil form. ................................................................................. 33 Figure 19: Low chroma grey matrix and sesquioxide mottles in the G-horizon of a Katspruit soil form. ........................................................................... 33 Figure 20: Delineated riparian zones and wetlands in the study area with 32 m buffer zones. ....................................................................................... 37 Figure 21: CBA and ESA image for the study area (red polygon) according to the 2015 Free State Biodiversity Plan. .................................................... 47 Figure 22: Wetland and riparian zone sensitivity in the study area. ............... 50 Figure 23: An Eskom power line situated in a temporary zone of an unchanneled drainage line wetland in the south of the study area. ........ 51 Figure 24: An inspection manhole for a water pipe line situated in the same drainage line as the power line in Figure 23. .......................................... 51 Figure 25: Total transformation of the riparian zone of the northern bank of a section of the Vaal River in the study area.............................................. 52 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Soils and plant species associated with different wetness zones of un-channelled and seepage wetlands and riparian floodplain wetlands in the study area. ........................................................................................ 34 3 ERC: A.R. Götze – February 2018 – SH201804 Wetland Assessment: Western Margin Gap West Table 2: Soils and plant species associated with different wetness zones of man-made dams. .................................................................................... 35 Table 3: Soils and plant species associated with riparian zones in the study area. ....................................................................................................... 35 Table 4: Habitat integrity assessment criteria for palustrine wetlands (DWAF, 1999). ..................................................................................................... 38 Table 5: Scoring guidelines and relative confidence scores for the habitat integrity assessment for palustrine wetlands (DWAF, 1999)................... 39 Table 6: Category's assigned to the scores achieved in the wetland habitat assessment (Kleynhans, 1999; DWAF, 1999). ....................................... 40 Table 7: Broad PES values and categories of the wetland and riparian habitats in the study area. ....................................................................... 40 Table 8: Score sheet for determining EIS. ..................................................... 41 Table 9: Scoring guidelines and relative confidence scores for the habitat integrity assessment for palustrine wetlands (DWAF, 1999)................... 41 Table 10: Ecological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Year End Results: Sens Release and Commentary
    Raubex Group Limited (Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa) Registration number 2006/023666/06 Share Code: RBX ISIN Code: ZAE000093183 (“Raubex” or the “Group”) AUDITED RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Revenues up 94,9% to R4,16bn (2008: R2,14bn) Operating profit up 84,2% to R794,6m (2008: R431,3m) Group operating margin of 19,1% (2008: 20,2%) HEPS up 62% to 291,7 cents per share (2008: 180,1 cents per share) Strong cash flow from operations up 114,9% to R964,4m (2008: R448,8m) Capex spend of R382,8m (2008: R244,6m) Solid order book of R5,2bn (2008: R2,7bn) Final dividend of 70 cents per share declared Francois Diedrechsen, Financial and Commercial Director of Raubex Group, said: “Despite difficult global market conditions, the year under review saw the Group deliver yet another solid operational and financial performance in line with expectations. The acquisitions incorporated during the past year are performing well and have added significantly to our capacity and skills set. The benefits of the government’s infrastructure spend have now filtered through to the bottom line as demonstrated by our growing order book and the continued healthy demand for our services. Large contract wins locally and abroad, including two new significant contracts in Namibia, is a very positive development for Raubex and we will continue to carefully position the Group as a major player in SADC geographies meeting our investment criteria. We are confident that our healthy financial position, extended footprint and cost conscious approach will allow the Group to maintain its strong performance in the medium-term.” 18 May 2009 ENQUIRIES Raubex Group +27 (0) 12 665 3226 Francois Diedrechsen College Hill +27 (0) 11 447 3030 Frédéric Cornet +27 (0) 83 307 8286 Hayley Crane +27 (0) 82 815 1821 COMMENTARY FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Revenue increased 94,9% to R4,16 billion and operating profit increased 84,2% to R794,6 million from the corresponding prior period.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 2010 Spatial Development Framework
    1 Nketoana Spatial Development Framework (Nketoana SDF) 2009-2010 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBERS Preface (Mayor) 8 Preface (Municipal Manager) 8 Technical Team 9 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Methodology 10 1.2 The Study Area 10 1.3 Purpose of the SDF 10 1.4 Structure of the SDF 10 1.5 Level of Detail 10 1.6 Objectives of the SDF 10 SECTION 2: NKETOANA IN THE REGION 2.1. National Spatial Development Perspective 12 2.2. Revised Free State Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (FSGDS) 12 2.3. Thabo Mofutsanyana District SDF 12 SECTION 3: SECTORAL ALIGNMENT PROPOSALS 3.1. Integrated Development Plan 15 SECTION 4: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS 4.1. Socio Economic Analysis 23 4.1.1. Demographic analysis 23 4.1.1.1. Population 23 4.1.1.2. Gender Distribution 23 4.1.1.3. Age Distribution 24 4.1.1.4. Labour Sector 24 3 4.1.1.5. Income Distribution 24 4.1.1.6. Job creation and local economic development 24 4.1.2. Urban Environments 25 4.1.2.1. Land use and settlement pattern 25 4.1.2.2. Transportation Infrastructure 30 4.1.2.3. Engineering Infrastructure 32 4.1.2.4. Housing 36 4.1.2.4.1. Reitz-Petsana 37 4.1.2.4.2. Petrus Steyn-Mamfubedu 37 4.1.2.4.3. Arlington-Leratswana 37 4.1.2.4.4. Lindley-Ntha 38 4.1.3. Rural Environments 38 4.1.3.1. Activities 38 4.1.3.2. Infrastructure 39 4.1.3.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaal River System : Overarching Internal Strategic Perspective
    ISP: VAAL RIVER SYSTEM OVERARCHING Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Directorate National Water Resource Planning INTERNAL STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE FOR THE VAAL RIVER SYSTEM OVERARCHING (WMAs No 8, 9 & 10) Title: Internal Strategic Perspective for the Vaal River System Overarching DWAF Report No: P RSA C000/00/0103 Consultants: PDNA, WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, WMB and Kwezi-V3 Status of Report: Version 1 Version Controller: Ms T Malaka (From Central Cluster) Date: March 2004 Approved for Consultants by: DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Directorate National Water Resource Planning Approved for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry by: REPORT NUMBER: P RSA C000/00/0103 I ISP: VAAL RIVER SYSTEM OVERARCHING REFERENCE This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. 2004. Internal Strategic Perspective: Vaal River System Overarching. Prepared by PDNA, WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, WMB and Kwezi-V3 on behalf of the Directorate: National Water Resource Planning. DWAF Report No P RSA C000/00/0103 INVITATION TO COMMENT This report will be updated on a regular basis until it is eventually superseded by the Catchment Management Strategies of the three Vaal WMAs. Water users and other stakeholders in the Upper, Middle and Lower Vaal WMAs and other areas are encouraged to study this report and to submit any comments they may have to the Version Controller (see box overleaf). ELECTRONIC VERSION This report is also available in electronic format as follows:
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Overview
    Cultural Guiding Free State Course 1 Module # 1 – Component # 1 Provincial Overview Introduction The Free State is known as South Africa's ‘breadbasket’ or ‘granary of the country’ and more than 30,000 farms produces over 70% of the country's grain. The province also boasts, among others productive gold and diamond mines, majestic sandstone mountains and archaeological and paleontological treasures. To the local rugby supporter this is ‘Cheetah country’! The landscape is characterised by the grassy plains of South Africa’s interior plateau. This is South Africa’s geographical heart, caught up between the Vaal and Orange Rivers. It is landlocked by KwaZulu Natal, Mpumalanga, Gauteng, North West, the Eastern Cape and Northern Cape. The neighbouring Lesotho fits in the hollow of the province’s bean- like shape. The current borders date from 1994 when the Bantustans were abolished and included into the provinces of South Africa. It is the only Province of the former provinces of South Africa which did not undergo border changes (excluding the incorporation of the Qwa-Qwa Bantustan). The Republic of the Orange Free State (Afrikaans: Oranje-Vrystaat; Dutch: Oranje- Vrijstaat) was an independent Boer republic in southern Africa during the second half of the 19th century. After the Second Anglo Boer War (Great South African War) it was a British colony for a short period, until 1910 when it became one of the four provinces of the Union of South Africa. In 1995, it became known as the Free State Province, one of the nine provinces of South Africa under the new dispensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE SONETTE SMIT 8 RENDEZVOUS STREET HELDERVUE SOMERSET WEST 7129 TEL: 021 8512673 (w) CELL: 084 5855706 E- MAIL: [email protected] EMPLOYMENT HISTORY May 2012 – present Greenmined Environmental Managing Director and Environmental Consultant My duties consist of: Management of company and team of consultants, Liaising with clients Compilation of Environmental Management Programs, Environmental Impact Assessments (Basic Assessments and Full EIA’s) Compliance Monitoring ECO Monitoring GIS – Drawing locality and site maps for applications using planet GIS. Responsible for the public participation processes during projects Applications for mining authorization, water use authorizations and waste disposal permits. Liaise with authorities Water Use Authorizations Water use license processes including the following: Consultation with applicants Managing water use applications Compiling Waste Water Management Plans Training of new employees June 2009 – April 2012 Enviroworks Environmental Consultants Environmental Practitioner My duties consist of: Management of Cape Town Branch including all management duties involved. Liaising with clients Compilation of Environmental Management Programs Environmental Impact Assessments (Basic Assessments and Full EIA’s) Compliance Monitoring ECO Monitoring GIS – Drawing locality and site maps for applications using planet GIS. Responsible for the public participation processes during projects Applications for mining authorization, water use authorizations and waste disposal permits.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Basic Assessment Report
    Draft Basic Assessment Report BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT KROONSTAD FARMER PRODUCTION SUPPORT UNIT FEZILE DABI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, FREESTATE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA Prepared By: Environmental Management Group P.O. Box 28242, Danhof, 9310 June 2018 Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, promulgated in terms of the National EnvironmentalPrepared Management For: Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (For official use only) 1 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT DESTEA Ref No: NEAS Ref No: Application Number: Date Received: Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. 2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report. 4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Wastewater Treatment Status, July 2009
    MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT BASE INFORMATION FOR TARGETED RISK – BASED REGULATION FREE STATE PROVINCE STATUS AT JULY 2009 FREE STATE INDEX A. Context 3 B. Purpose of Report: Risk-Based Assessment 4 C. Overview of the Free State Wastewater Treatment Works 5 D. Licensing Status of Wastewater Treatment Works in the Free State 8 E. Receiving Plans Vs Design Capacity 11 F. WSA / WSP Arrangements, Technology used and Compliance Standards 17 G. Effluent Quality Non-Compliance Trends 21 H. Technical Skills Gap Analysis 30 I. Weighted Prioritisation of Potentially High Risk WWTW 42 J. Conclusions and Recommendations 47 All assessment data and information reflected in the Risk Based Assessments, its Executive Summaries and electronic data sheets are property of the Department of Water Affairs. It has been developed- and paid for under the national Wastewater Regulatory Programme 2008/09 (DWA Water Services Regulations). It is illegal to sell this material for profit. Would the material be reproduced or quoted, DWA should be acknowledged and referenced. Page 2 of 55 Page 3 of 55 A. CONTEXT South Africa has build a substantial wastewater management industry that comprises of approximately 9 70 treatment plants, extensive pipe networks, and pump stations, transporting and treating an average of 7 589 000 kilolitres of wastewater on a daily basis. The country runs a prominent wastewater treatment business with capital replacement value of >R 23 billion and operational expenditure of >R 3.5 b per annum. Frost and Sullivan (2006) estimate the value of the RSA water and wastewater treatment equipment market at US$ 135m, with growth at 3.8%.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Management and Geo-Hydrological Aspects Of
    Municipal management and geo-hydrological aspects of importance in the potable water supply of Lindley EJ NEALER1 AND WE BERTRAM2 Abstract When the South African Government in 1998 re-demarcated its 283 municipalities so that they completely cover the country in a “wall-to-wall” manner, their main focus was on growing local economies and maintaining the provision of an increased number of diverse and more complex basic municipal services to new geographical areas consisting of millions of citizens who might previously had been neglected. In most of the instances the newly established and merged municipalities were demarcated according to geographical aspects inherited from the previous political dispensation, historical municipal areas and magisterial district farm names. The fact that these municipal government jurisdictions for the purpose of improving co-operative municipal- and integrated water resources management (IWRM), in most instances do not correspond with environmental and physical land features such as the demarcated surface water (rivers) drainage regions’ boundaries, could lead to the ineffective, inefficient and non-economic municipal management of water, sanitation and environmental services. The aforementioned is a case with reference to water services management in the Free State Province town of Lindley located in the Vals River catchment and the Nketoana Local Municipality’s area of jurisdiction. An extensive literature review, the use and study of geographic tools such as maps, ortho- photos and information data bases, as well as two field visits to the area, enabled the researchers to identify the essential geographical, geo-hydrological and municipal management aspects of importance for the potable water service providers and managers in the Lindley municipal area.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface and Groundwater Resources
    Orange-Senqu River Basin Orange-Senqu River Commission Secretariat Governments of Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and South Africa UNDP-GEF Orange-Senqu Strategic Action Programme (Atlas Project ID 71598) Surface and Groundwater Resources Contribution to the Final Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and Built Structures Database for the Orange-Senqu Basin Technical Report 20 Rev 0, 7 December 2011 UNDP-GEF Orange-Senqu Strategic Action Programme Capacity Development Activities UNDP-GEF Orange-Senqu Strategic Action Programme Surface and Groundwater Resources This report has been submitted by Allan Bailey ([email protected]), utilising previous research on the subject, including previous work of ORASECOM and its ICP supported projects. This detailed report is a background document to the Transboundray Diagnostic Analysis Report. This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 0 Final standalone (detailed) report 07 Dec 2011 AB Project executed by: Surface and Groundwater Resources Contribution to Final Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and Built Structures Database for the Orange-Senqu Basin FINAL STANDALONE (DETAILED) REPORT December 2011 Submitted by: SSI Engineers and Environmental Consultants Executive Summary The Orange-Senqu Basin (hereafter referred to as the Basin) covers a large part of South Africa, the whole of Lesotho and parts of Namibia and Botswana. It is the most important basin in South Africa and Lesotho. The rivers in the Basin are a source of water for agriculture, domestic use in towns and settlements, industry, mining, energy, recreation and tourism. In South Africa the Basin includes the Vaal and Orange rivers which form a major part of the water resources and water infrastructure in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Audited Results for the Year Ended 28 February 2009
    Audited Results for the year ended 28 February 2009 Highlights • Revenues up 94,9% to R4,16 billion (2008: R2,14 billion) • Operating profit up 84,2% to R794,6 million (2008: R431,3 million) • Group operating margin of 19,1% (2008: 20,2%) • HEPS up 62% to 291,7 cents per share (2008: 180,1 cents per share) • Strong cash flow from operations up 114,9% to R964,4 million (2008: R448,8 million) • Capex spend of R382,8 million (2008: R244,6 million) • Solid order book of R5,2 billion (2008: R2,7 billion) • Final dividend of 70 cents per share declared AUDITED GROUP INCOME STATEMENT AUDITED GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS Acquisitions Audited Audited Audited Audited The following acquisitions became effective after the balance sheet date. 28 February 29 February 28 February 29 February Anchor Park Investments 71 (Pty) Limited 2009 2008 2009 2008 The group acquired 100% of the share capital of Anchor Park Investments 71 (Pty) Limited for R35 million cash. The company owns a Pilatus PC12 aircraft and will provide flight services to the Group. R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 Revenue 4 162 780 2 135 778 Cash flows from operating activities Francois Diedrechsen, Financial and Commercial Director of Raubex Group, said: “Despite difficult global Cost of sales (3 148 561) (1 616 112) Cash generated from operations 964 405 448 815 market conditions, the year under review saw the Group deliver yet another solid operational and financial Interest received 42 630 12 997 performance in line with expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Development Framework
    REVIEWED SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IN TERMS OF SECTION 34 OF THE MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS ACT, 2000 (ACT 32 OF 2000), SECTION 20(3)(A) OF THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT ACT, ACT 16 OF 2013 AND SECTION 4(2) OF THE MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY LAND USE PLANNING BY-LAWS, NOVEMBER 2015 December 2018 Prepared by the IDP Steering Committee of the Moqhaka Local Municipality & L M V TOWN PLANNERS (056) 215 2260 (056) 212 3381 CONTENTS PART A I. GLOSSARY II. APPROVAL III. ALIGNED PROJECTS IV. ALIGNMENT MEASURES PART B 1. INTRODUCTION 32 2. LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT AND CONSULTATION PROCESS 36 2.1 Legislative Context 2.1.1 Historical Course of Legislation and Guidelines 2.1.2 The Municipal Systems Act 2.1.3 The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 2.2 Guidelines 2.3 Participation Structure 2.4 Methodology 2.4.1 Implementation 2.4.2 Critical Milestones and Deliverables 2 3. ISSUES, VISION & DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES 44 3.1 Community and Stakeholder Analysis 3.2 Integrated Development Plan Vision and Mission Statement 3.3 Spatial Vision and Spatial Development Goals 3.3.1 Long-term Spatial Vision 3.3.2 Spatial Development Vision 3.3.3 Spatial Development Goals 3.4 Conduction of Public Consultative Processes 4. STATUS QUO: SOCIO ECONOMIC 50 4.1 Demographic Realities 4.2 Regional Gender and Age Distribution 4.3 Local Economic Development 4.3.1 Current Development Initiatives 4.3.2 Regional Economic Tendencies 4.3.3 Long-Term Economic Prospects 4.3.4 Unemployment and Economic Difficulties 4.3.5 Influencing Factors PART C: SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 5.
    [Show full text]