Spatial Development Framework 2007 3

Home , Caledon Nature Reserve, Free State (province), Gariep Dam (town), Oranjeville, Sasolburg, Steynsrus

Final Draft FREE STATE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (FSSDF)

(2007)

Compiled by: Department of Local Government and Housing Governance Policy and Research Chief Directorate Spatial Planning Directorate Spatial Information Services July 2007 SDFFinalDraftJuly2007_1 2

TABLE OF CONTENT page

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...... 3

1.1 LIST OF ACRONYMS...... 5

2. INTRODUCTION...... 7

2.1 Aim of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework...... 7

2.2 Content requirement from a legal perspective...... 7

2.3 Objectives of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework...... 7

3. SITUATION ANALYSIS...... 9

3.1 Spatial characteristics of the Province...... 9

3.1.1 Physical Characteristics...... 9

4. NEED AND POTENTIAL...... 10

4.1 Areas of Need...... 10

4.2 Areas of Potential...... 39

4.2.1 National Spatial Development Perspective...... 39

4.2.2 Proposed Spatial Initiatives...... 44

4.2.3 Summary of FSSDF Spatial Initiatives and corresponding NSDP Categories as portrayed in the FSGDS...... 62

4.2.4 Reviewed Free State Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (2005 - 2014): Strategies and Programmes of Spatial Dimension...... 75

5. TABLES...... 87

6. ANNEXURES...... 172

A. General Maps...... 173

B. Reviewed FSGDS (2006) Maps according to NSDP Principles...... 184

C. Analysis Maps...... 195

D. Provincial Spatial Development Framework Maps...... 216

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 3

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Aim of the Free State Spatial Development Framework (FSSDF) 2007 is to guide spatial planning, land development and land use management in the province. The document provides an overview of areas of development potential and areas of need in the Free State.

Content requirement of the FSSDF 2007 from a legal perspective, as well its objectives were elaborated on.

An alignment of the FSSDF 2007 with the National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) 2003 via the reviewed Free State Growth and Development Strategy (FSGDS) 2006 was undertaken (Chapter 4.2.1 FSSDF 2007). The National Spatial Development Vision (NSDP page 35) and Normative principles to be used as a guide by all spheres of government when making decisions on infrastructure investment and development spending were investigated. Government spending on fixed investment, beyond the constitutional obligations to provide basic services to all citizens, should be focused on localities of economic growth and/or potential for sustainable economic development in order to attract private sector investment, stimulate sustainable economic activities and/or create long- term employment opportunities. In these areas government’s objective of both promoting economic growth and alleviating poverty will best be achieved.

An investigation on areas of need in the Free State took place (Chapter 4.1 FSSDF 2007). Development objectives set for the four Provincial priority areas, namely: a. Economic growth, development and employment b. Social and human development c. Justice and crime prevention d. Efficient governance and administration formed the basis for a spatial investigation of need. Socio-economic indicators pertaining to the development objectives were investigated in order to arrive at specific geographic areas (local, district or provincial) of need. These geographic areas of need are displayed by way of attached tables and thematic maps. The thematic maps visualize all of the local municipalities, but the discussion per socio-economic parameter concentrates only on the top 8 local municipalities of need. Municipalities can measure itself against these areas of need per socio-economic indicator.

An alignment with the reviewed FSGDS 2006 regarding areas of need also took place (Chapter 4.2.1 FSSDF 2007). Table 4.4 of the reviewed FSGDS 2006 categorises town and municipalities in terms of development need.

An alignment with the reviewed FSGDS 2006 regarding areas of potential took place. The reviewed FSGDS utilized the 6 NSDP Categories of Development Potential to identify for all Free State towns and local municipalities the NSDP categories applicable for a specific town/

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 4 municipality. The specific NSDP Categories of Development Potential indicated by the reviewed FSGDS 2006 for towns formed the basis for a classification of Free State towns in the FSSDF 2007, taken into account combined development potential (high and above average) and combined development need (high and above average). In this regard, a visualizing of the Free State Province by way of proposed spatial initiatives was undertaken, utilizing a set of structuring elements. These structuring elements are: • Centres (Administrative, Educational, Legislative, Services) • Nodes (Collective Economic, Specialised Economic, Retail and Private Services, Manufacturing, Mining, Agricultural, Tourism Attraction, Tourism Surroundings, Bio-fuel, Presidential, Industrial Development Zone (IDZ), Restitution, Nature Reserves and Conservancies) • Hubs (Economic, Jewellery, Petro-chemical, Logistics) • Routes (Tourism) • Axes (Transport) • Corridors (Development) • Zones (Tourism, Commercial Agriculture, Irrigation) The FSSDF 2007 aligned its Spatial Initiatives with the NSDP Categories of Development Potential as portrayed in the reviewed FSGDS 2006. Refer to Chapter 4.2.2: Proposed Spatial Initiatives and Chapter 4.2.3: Summary of FSSDF Spatial Initiatives and corresponding NSDP categories.

Four FSSDF Maps on Economy, Tourism, Environment and Mining/ Agriculture were produced.

An alignment with the reviewed FSGDS 2006 regarding strategies and programmes applicable to the 4 Provincial priority areas were undertaken (Chapter 4.2.4 FSSDF 2007). Specific strategies and programmes of spatial dimension were extracted and identified in the FSSDF 2007.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 5

1.1 LIST OF ACRONYMS

ABET Adult Basic Education and Training

AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

ARV Antiretroviral

BEE Black Economic Empowerment

ECD Early Childhood Development

EMS Emergency Management Services

FET Further Education and Training

FSGDS Free State Growth and Development Strategy

FSSDF Free State Spatial Development Framework

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GGP Gross Geographic Product

GVA Gross Value Added

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus

ICT Information and Communications Technology

IDP Integrated Development Plan

IDZ Industrial Development Zone

IMR Infant Mortality Rate

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 6

NSDP National Spatial Development Perspective

PDI Previously Disadvantaged Individuals

PMTCT Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission

SMME Small, Medium and Micro Enterprise

VCCT Voluntary Confidential Counselling and Treatment

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 7

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 Aim of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework

Aim of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework is to guide spatial planning, land development and land use management in the province.

2.2 Content requirement from a legal perspective

A Provincial Spatial Development Framework must - (a) be consistent with national planning perspectives (b) be consistent with any applicable national legislation on environmental management and planning (c) co-ordinate and integrate the spatial aspects of the plans and programmes of the various provincial departments and agencies. (d) take into account, co-ordinate and integrate local and district municipal spatial development frameworks in the province (Land Use Management Bill, 2003).

A Provincial Spatial Development Framework must reflect –

(a) a status quo report on land use in the province including any spatial dysfunctionality that exist, (b) a conceptual framework reflecting desired spatial growth patterns in the province (c) a multi-sector based spatial plan, at an appropriate scale, sufficiently formulated to achieve the desired spatial development goals including (i) the correction of past spatial imbalances and the integration of disadvantaged persons (ii) linkage between settlement development and appropriate transport infrastructure and systems (iii) vacant land analysis of strategically located land (Land Use Management Bill, 2003)

A Provincial Spatial Development Framework must where a provincial growth and development plan does not provide for it, reflect a multi- sector resource plan for implementation of the spatial development framework (Land Use Management Bill, 2003).

2.3 Objectives of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework

A Provincial Spatial Development Framework:

(a) informs on the strategic focused areas (spatially) of provincial departments and service providers (b) foster spatial development in such a way that resources are invested optimally and areas of potential are promoted in a sustainable manner.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 8

(c) identifies the key spatial development issues, main nodes and zones of potential where development could be encourage, and those natural systems and environmental areas where development should be carefully and sensitively managed. (d) provides management principles and criteria for spatial development issues to enable Local and District Municipalities to formulate IDPs within a broad policy framework that is aligned to national planning strategies (e) gives direction to line departments within Provincial Government and other development agencies responsible for investment programmes, infrastructure and development (f) assists to co-ordinate sectoral plans and interdepartmental co- operation (g) manages development in the province towards achievement of a common vision and set of objectives (h) guides as to where development attention could be directed in the province to achieve the most effective benefits in a co- ordinated manner for the ordering of spatial development in areas of opportunity and need (i) provides the framework for the spatial elements of development actions from a provincial perspective (j) is derived from the Provincial Growth and Development Strategy

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 9

3. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS

3.1 Spatial characteristics of the Province 3.1.1 Physical Characteristics

The physical characteristics of the province have an impact on development as specific physical characteristics influence human settlement and development. It is important therefore that the physical characteristics are identified in order to consider it when development projects and programmes are designed.

In this regard, the following general maps are attached per Annexure A:

• Location of towns and administrative districts

• Soil types

• Average annual rainfall

• Average annual maximum daily temperature

• Average annual minimum daily temperature

• Agricultural types

• Topography

• Vegetation types

• Surface water

• Mining (including mineral deposits)

• Locality of schools

• Sensitive sites

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 10

4. NEED AND POTENCIAL

4.1 AREAS OF NEED

Development objectives set for the four Provincial priority areas, namely:

a. Economic growth, development and employment b. Social and human development c. Justice and crime prevention d. Efficient governance and administration

formed the basis for a spatial investigation of need.

Utilizing statistical data together with the local municipal and district municipal levels as basis, an investigation of the socio economic indicators pertaining to the development objectives were undertaken in order to arrive at specific geographic areas (local, district or provincial) of need.

The assessment prioritised the top 8 local municipalities per socio- economic indicator in respect of need, in order to arrive at specific geographic areas of need.

The following development objectives were assessed:

• Obtain economic growth rate of 6%-7% per annum (Section 1 (i) ) • Reduce unemployment from 38% to 20% (Section 1 (ii) ) • Reduce number of households living in poverty by 5% per annum (Section 1 (iii) ) • Adequate infrastructure for economic development (Section 1 (vi) ) • Improve functional literacy rate from 65.3% to 85% (Section 2(i) ) • Reduce mortality of children under five years to less than 65 per 1000 births (Section2 (ii) ) • Reduce maternal mortality rate from 150 to 100 per 100 000 live births of woman in the reproductive group (Section 2 (iii) ) • Stabilise prevalence rate of HIV and AIDS and reverse the incidence thereof (Section 2 (iv) ) • Provide shelter for all in the province (Section 2 (v) ) • Provide free basics services to all households (Section 2 (vi) ) • Reduce crime rate by at least 7% per annum (Section 3 (i) ) • Reduce number of roads accidents deaths by 3% per annum (Section 3 (ii) )

These geographic areas of need are displayed by way of attached tables and thematic maps. The thematic maps visualize all of the local municipalities, but the discussion per socio-economic parameter concentrates only on the top 8 local municipalities of need.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 11

1. PRIORITY AREA: ECONOMIC GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT

The following key objectives were set for the priority area:

• To achieve an economic growth rate of 6%-7% per annum • To reduce unemployment from 38,9% to 20% • To reduce the number of households living in poverty by 5% per annum • To provide adequate infrastructure for economic growth and development

(i) KEY OBJECTIVE 1.1: TO ACHIEVE AN ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE OF 6%-7% PER ANNUM

An investigation of economic growth took place on provincial, district and settlement levels:

The following information was extracted from the reviewed FSGDS (2006).

The average economic growth rate for the Free State for 1996 to 2000 was 1.2% and for 2001 to 2003 it was 0.1%. For the period 1996 to 2004 the average economic growth rate for the province was 0.7% compared with 2.8% for South Africa (see Table 1).

Table 1: Average annual growth (constant at 2000 prices)

Year South Africa Free State 1997 2.6% 1.0% 1998 0.5% -2.0% 1999 2.4% 1.2% 2000 4.2% 4.4% 2001 2.7% -4.1% 2002 3.6% -0.7% 2003 2.8% 3.3% 1996-2004 2.8% 0.7% Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

The nominal GDP of the Free State, which measures the total of final products and services produced within the borders of the province, equalled just over R 65 billion by 2004. Real per capita GDP was R 21 753 in 2004 compared with R 12 866 ten years earlier in 1994 (constant 2000 prices). The Free State contributes only 4.7% towards the national economy. This is less than the relative size of the provincial population (6.3%). This slightly smaller economy relative to the population is also reflected in the per capita GVA (which is the difference between output and intermediate consumption for any given sector/industry) of R21 753, compared with the average of R29 071 for South Africa.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 12

Spatial referencing at the district municipality level:

Table 2a provides an overview of the economic contribution in real and percentage terms of each district. Considering the relative economic contribution of each district’s economy as measured in GVA, it is clear that Motheo and Fezile Dabi are the districts contributing the most to the Free State Economy. In terms of GDP Motheo and Fezile Dabi have jointly contributed almost two-thirds (64.7%) of the province’s economy. Fezile Dabi has performed exceptionally well in that it almost doubled its economic contribution (31.8%) compared with its population share (16.3%). In contrast to this, Thabo Mafutsanyana and Xhariep together contributed only 14.6% of the total output of the Free State’s economy. While Lejweleputswa had contributed the most towards the provincial economy in 1996, it slid back to the third place (20.8%) since 2004 due to the decline in the mining sector.

In terms of the NSDP it is clear that, from a district economical perspective, the focus regarding potential for growth should be on Fezile Dabi and Motheo as key districts to propel the Free State economy up the next ten years. Fezile Dabi has almost tripled its economic contribution to the economy of the province relative to the other sectors, while Motheo maintained an increase in GVA rate of just more than 7%.

Table 2a: GVA contribution per District Municipality

2004 Annual Growth or growth decline in rate, real 1996 –2004 GVA numbers (000) (%) District (000) %

MOTHEO 19 218 931 32.9 10 810 593 FEZILE DABI 18 567 251 31.8 10 016 685 LEJWELEPUTSWA 12 143 119 20.8 2 609 385 THABO MOFUTSANYANA 6 869 922 11.8 2 747 892 XHARIEP 1 650 082 2.8 -509 844 FREE STATE 58 449 305 100 25 674 711 0.7 SOUTH AFRICA 1 230 409 307 100 664 936 339 2.8 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

The top five specific localities (magisterial districts) contributing most to the economy of the Free State during 2004 were Bloemfontein (R 17.7 bill.), Sasolburg (R 15,2 bill.), Welkom (R6.5 bill.), Kroonstad (R2.3 bill.) and Bethlehem (R2.2 bill.).

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 13

Spatial referencing at the local municipality level:

Table 2b: GDP contribution per local Municipalities

Municipality GDP Contribution (%) 2004

MANGAUNG 31.35 METSIMAHOLO 21.61 MATJHABENG 15.04 MOQHAKA 6.52 MALUTI-A-PHOFUNG 4.33 DIHLABENG 3.47 NGWATHE 2.34 MASILONYANA 2.25 SETSOTO 2.18 NALA 1.95 KOPANONG 1.30 MAFUBE 1.28 TSWELOPELE 1.23 MANTSOPA 1.16 NKETOANA 1.12 LETSEMENG 0.83 MOHOKARE 0.69 PHUMELELA 0.66 NALEDI 0.37 TOKOLOGO 0.31 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

(ii) KEY OBJECTIVE 1.2: TO REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT FROM 38,9% TO 20%

An investigation of income identified the following specific geographic areas (local and district municipalities) with highest need:

The FSGDS Review reveals that, level of population unemployed in the Free State Province is currently at 506 876 with an unemployment rate of 39.1% (2004)

The expanded definition of unemployment (FSGDS Review 2006) defines one as unemployed if one is aged between 15-65, not employed or self employed, was available for employment or self employment in the seven days preceding the interview and had the desire to take up employment or self employment, but are discourage to do so (due to, inter alia, long distances to travel to look for work, or been looking for a long time). Table 3 below indicates unemployment levels per person per district municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 14

Table 3: Unemployment profile per district municipality.

Unemployment 2004

District Number of Rate (%) people THABO MOFUTSANYANA 125 941 45.8 LEJWELEPUTSWA 156 568 38.8 MOTHEO 120 173 37.8 FEZILE DABI 75 893 35.6 XHARIEP 28 301 34.0 FREE STATE 506 876 39.1 SOUTH AFRICA 7 382 156 40.4

Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

Thabo Mofutsanyana district municipality has the highest unemployment rate (45,8%), followed by Lejweleputswa, Motheo and Fezile Dabi district municipalities. Xhariep district municipalities has the lowest unemployment rate (34,0%).

The table below indicates the number of people and the rate at which unemployment is taking place per local municipality per top 8.

Table 4: Unemployment per local Municipalities per top 8

Unemployment 2004 Municipality Number of Rate (%) people MALUTI-A-PHOFUNG 80664 61.7 NGWATHE 24034 43.5 NALA 12328 41.1 MATJHABENG 121247 39.5 MANTSOPA 9553 38.6 PHUMELELA 9242 38.6

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 15

MANGAUNG 107305 37.8 MASILONYANA 12254 37.6 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

At local municipal level, the unemployment rate is predominantly higher at Maluti a Phofung (61.7%), Ngwathe (43.5%) and Nala (41.1%) followed by Mantsopa and Phumelela at 38.6%. Mangaung and Masilonyana have 37.8% and 37.6% respectively.

Map attached per Annexure C is: (1) Thematic map C.1 that shows percentage of population unemployed per local municipality

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 16

Table attached is: (1) Table (page 87) of thematic map C.1 that shows percentage population of unemployed people per local municipality

(iii) KEY OBJECTIVE 1.3: TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS LIVING IN POVERTY BY 5% PER ANNUM

An investigation of poverty identified the following specific geographic areas (district and local municipalities) with highest need:

The information presented in this section has been extracted from the FSGDS Review 2006.

The percentage of people living in poverty in the Free State Province is 55.9% (1 672 119) of the total population.

The FSGDS Review 2006 defines poverty rate as the percentage/ number of people in a household with an income less than the poverty income. Poverty income is defined as the minimum monthly income needed to sustain a household and varies according to the household size: the larger the household, the larger the income required to keep its to keep its members out of poverty. The table below indicates monthly poverty income per household size for the year 2004.

Table 5: Monthly poverty income per household size (R per month) in 2004.

Household size 2004 1 871 2 1 074 3 1 398 4 1 713 5 2 042 6 2 391 7 2 708 8+ 3 241 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 17

Table 6: Poverty profile per district municipality.

People living in poverty 2004 District Number of people Rate (%) THABO MOFUTSANYANA 510 124 68.1 LEJWELEPUTSWA 448 163 56.1 FEZILE DABI 289 284 56.1 XHARIEP 98 590 49.5 MOTHEO 325 958 44.9 FREE STATE 1 672 119 55.9 SOUTH AFRICA 23 500 962 49.7 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

Thabo Mofutsanyana, Lejweleputswa and Fezile Dabi district municipalities have predominantly higher percentages (68.1%, 56.1% and 56.1% respectively) of people living in poverty whereas Xhariep and Motheo have 49.5% and 44.9% respectively.

The table below indicates the number of people and the rate per local municipality per top 8 of people living in poverty.

Table 7: Poverty rate per local municipality per top 8

People living in poverty Municipality 2004

Number of people Rate (%) TSWELOPELE 45 762 79.6 TOKOLOGO 23 095 79.6 PHUMELELA 47 563 78.2 MAFUBE 46 101 77.0 SETSOTO 83 366 75.2 NALA 63 307 74.9 NALEDI 18 308 74.8 NKETOANA 60 454 74.0 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

At local municipal level Tswelopele and Tokologo have the highest rate (79.6%) of people living in poverty.

Map attached per Annexure C is: (1) Thematic map C.2 that shows percentage population living in poverty per local municipality

Table attached is: (1) Table (page 88) of thematic map C.2 that shows percentage population living in poverty per local municipality

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 18

(iv) KEY OBJECTIVE 1.4: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Refer to Chapter 4.2.2: Proposed Spatial initiatives and Chapter 4.2.3: Summary of FSSDF Spatial Initiatives and corresponding NSDP Categories for towns and cities indicated as economic hubs, collective economic nodes and specialised economic nodes.

2. PRIORITY AREA: SOCIAL AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

The following key objectives were set by the FSGDS for the following priority areas:

• To improve the functional literacy rate from 65,3% to 85% • To reduce mortality of children under five years to less than 65 per 1000 births • To reduce the maternal mortality rate from 150 to 100 per 100 000 live births of women in the reproductive group • To stabilise the prevalence rate of HIV and AIDS and reverse the incidence thereof. • To provide shelter for all in the Province. • To provide free basic services to all households

(i) KEY OBJECTIVE 2.1: TO IMPROVE THE FUNCTIONAL LITERACY RATE FROM 65,3% TO 85%

An investigation of education identified specific geographic areas (local and district municipalities) with highest need:

According to FSGDS Review 2006 the functional literacy rate (level of reading and writing sufficient for everyday life and is equal to completion of primary education) in the province is 65%. The table below indicates educational levels per district municipality within the province.

Table 8: Educational levels per district municipality. Education Xhariep Motheo Lejweleputswa Fezile Thabo Total Level Dabi Mofutsanyana No 23 598 74 217 86 401 54 836 114 084 354 936 Schooling Primary 73 325 360 002 342 912 233 937 365 071 1 375 247 Secondary 21 407 188 525 143 870 111 130 151 688 616 620 Tertiary 2 514 26 614 15 988 13 905 18 060 77 081 Higher 1 179 14 626 5 051 4 950 5 593 31 399 Degree Not 13 221 64 279 62 788 41 555 71 447 253 290 Applicable Total 135 244 723 663 657 010 460 313 725 943 2 708 573 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 19

At district level Xhariep district municipality has just below 18% (23598) of the people with no schooling, Thabo Mofutsanyana with 16% (114084), Lejweleputswa with 13% (86401) and Fezile Dabi with 12% (54836). This figure narrows to over 10% (74217) in Motheo district municipality. Over 50% (1375247) of the population have primary education and less than 25% (616620) have secondary education and it narrows to less than 4% (77081) with tertiary or higher degree qualifications.

The figures from the above table show restricted education at tertiary and higher levels for the entire province.

Table 9: No schooling per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of people TOKOLOGO 22.8 7 410 NKETOANA 20.3 12 586 LETSEMENG 19.9 8 544 TSWELOPELE 18.4 9 881 MAFUBE 17.9 10 297 MOHOKARE 16.6 6 037 KOPANONG 16.1 9 001 MALUTI-A-PHOFUNG 15.5 55 911 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table identifies the percentage of population with no schooling per local municipality per top 8.

Table 10: Limited education (up to grade 5) per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of people NALEDI 32.1 8 820 MOHOKARE 31.1 11 293 PHUMELELA 28.0 14 271 TSWELOPELE 27.9 14 964 KOPANONG 26.9 15 026 TOKOLOGO 26.9 8 737 NALA 26.8 26 302 MANTSOPA 26.5 14 673 Source: Statistics South Africa - Census 2001

The above table identifies the percentage of population with limited education (up to grade 5) per local municipality per top 8

Maps attached per Annexure C are: (1) Thematic map C.3 that shows percentage of population with no schooling per local municipality (2) Thematic map C.4 that shows percentage of population with limited schooling per local municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 20

Tables attached are: (1) Table (page 89) of thematic map C.3 that shows percentage of population with no schooling per local municipality (2) Table (page 90) of thematic map C.4 that shows percentage of population with limited schooling per local municipality.

(ii) KEY OBJECTIVE 2.2: TO REDUCE MORTALITY OF CHILDREN UNDER FIVE YEARS TO LESS THAN 65 PER 1000 BIRTHS

An investigation of child mortality took place at provincial level.

The following information has been extracted from the reviewed FSGDS (2006).

The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) (number of children dying under the age of one year) in the Free State has increased from 53 per 100 000 live births in 1998 to 62 per 100 000 live births in 2002, thereby ranking the Province fourth in South Africa. The South African Demographic and Health Survey estimated it at 68.3 per 1000 births, while the latest estimates from the Department of Health is 59.7 per 1000 births.

The Free State IMR compares well to the national average (45.4), but less favourably with developed countries such as Germany (5). Child mortality (number of children dying between one year and five years) in the Free State was 72 children per 100 000 live births in 1998. By 2003 it was estimated to be 86.7 per 1000 births, while the 2005 information from the Department if Health is 76.7 per 1000 births.

(iii) KEY OBJECTIVE 2.3: TO REDUCE THE MATERNAL MORTALITY RATE FROM 150 TO 100 PER 100 000 LIVE BIRTHS OF WOMEN IN THE REPRODUCTIVE GROUP

An investigation of maternal mortality took place at provincial level.

According to the Free State Growth and Development Strategy Review (FSGDS Review 2006) maternal mortality rate (which is a measure of the likelihood that a pregnant woman will die from maternal causes) in 1998 was estimated at 199 per 100 000 live births. It is further indicated that according to the latest information from the Department of Health, this indicator is estimated at 150 per 100 000 live births.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 21

(iv) KEY OBJECTIVE 2.4: TO STABILISE THE PREVALENCE RATE OF HIV AND AIDS AND REVERSE THE INCIDENCE THEREOF.

An investigation of the prevalence rate of HIV and Aids took place at provincial and district level.

According to the Free State Growth and Development Strategy Review (FSGDS Review 2006), the HIV and AIDS prevalence rate among pregnant women in the Free State was 30.1 % in 2003, but dropped to 29.5 in 2004. The current infection rate in the Free State is approximately 16.7% of the population. This is approximately 2.5% more than the national figure. The table below provides a broad overview of the number of people infected by HIV and AIDS per age category in the Free State.

Table 11: HIV and AIDS infection per age category in the Free State, 2005

Number of HIV positive cases in the Age group Free State 0-14 12 776 15-24 84 772 ADULTS 390 224 TOTAL 487 772 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Redelinghuys and Pelser, 2005)

The only HIV/ AIDS data available at the district level in the Free State is the HIV prevalence rate amongst pregnant women. The following table indicates the HIV prevalence rate per district municipality.

Table 12: HIV prevalence rate for pregnant women in the Free State, 1999 – 2003

District 2003 Projected HIV infection % for the population MOTHEO 36.3 22.9 LEJWELEPUTSWA 33.3 19.9 THABO MOFUTSANYANA 28.0 14.6 XHARIEP 25.7 12.3 FEZILE DABI 23.8 10.4 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Redelinghuys and Pelser, 2005)

The 3 municipal districts with the highest percentage of HIV and AIDS infections are Motheo, Lejweleputswa and Thabo Mofutsanyana.

In keeping with the national priorities, mechanisms have been put in place to manage HIV and AIDS in the Free State. The Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV (PMTCT) Programme was launched in November 2001 at two research sites in the Free State, namely

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 22

Katleho and Tokollo Hospitals together with their referring clinics. Existing research sites were expanded during 2002 within the Katleho/ Winburg District Hospital Complex as well as the Tokollo/Mafube District Hospital Complex and to establish one PMTCT site per remaining district. Nevirapine is now available at all institutions providing maternity services.

The implementation of the Antiretroviral (ARV) portion of the Comprehensive Care and Treatment of HIV and AIDS programme commenced in Welkom on 15 June 2004.

There are 242 sites offering Voluntary Confidential Counselling and Treatment (VCCT) services in the province. These are located in all of the five districts of the province. With regard to the comprehensive management of HIV infection and AIDS, the province has eight Antiretroviral (ARV) sites.

(iv) KEY OBJECTIVE 2.5: TO PROVIDE SHELTER FOR ALL IN THE PROVINCE.

An investigation of access to shelter identified the following specific geographic areas (district and local municipalities) with highest need:

The FSGDS Review indicates at district level 32.1% (51870) of households in local municipalities of Lejweleputswa district have have informal settlement dwellings. Motheo and Fezile Dabi districts respectively have 18.4% and 17.9% (See the table below) of the informal settlement dwellings.

Table 13: Informal dwellings per district municipality in the Free State, 2001.

Thabo Fezile Free Type of housing Xhariep Motheo Lejweleputswa Mofutsanyana Dabi State Informal dwellings 1227 9423 15972 10268 7163 44053 (backyard), 2001 (3.1%) (4.5%) (9.9%) (5.5%) (5.7%) (5.8%) (n) Percentage of the 2.8 21.4 36.3 23.3 16.3 100.0 Free State, 2001 Informal dwellings 4917 38611 51870 29409 22299 147106 2001 (12.5%) (18.4%) (32.1%) (15.8%) (17.9%) (19.4%) Percentage for the Free State, 3.3 26.2 35.3 20.0 15.2 100.0 2001 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Statistics South Africa, 2001)

Based on 2001 census data from Statistic South Africa, the three categories namely, traditional dwellings, shacks in the back yard and shacks not in the back yard have been grouped into one category which is then referred to as non formal dwelling and 8 local municipalities with highest potential need are indicated in the table below.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 23

Four local municipalities (Setsoto, Maluti a Phofung, Phumelela and Nketoana) in the district municipality of Thabo Mofutsanyana appear in the top 8 of local municipalities within the province that do not have access to formal dwellings. Nala and Matjhabeng in Lejweleputswa as well as Metsimaholo and Mafube in Fezile Dabi are also in the top eight of the table.

Table 14: No access to formal dwelling per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households SETSOTO 51.2 17 202 PHUMELELA 41.7 5 014 NKETOANA 41.5 6 230 NALA 39.9 10 375 MATJHABENG 39.9 51 270 METSIMAHOLO 34.3 11 570 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 33.8 31 110 MAFUBE 33.5 4 952 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table identifies the percentage of households that do not have formal dwellings per local municipality per top 8.

Maps attached per Annexure C are: (1) Thematic map C.5 that shows percentage of households with traditional dwellings per local municipality (2) Thematic map C.6 that shows percentage of households with shacks per local municipality. (3) Thematic map C.7 that shows percentage of households with traditional and informal dwellings.

Tables attached are: (1) Table (page 92) of thematic map C.5 that shows percentage of households with traditional dwellings per local municipality (2) Table (page 93) of thematic map C.6 that shows percentage of households with shacks per local municipality (3) Table (page 94) of thematic map C.7 that shows percentage of households with no formal dwellings (traditional and shacks) per local municipality

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 24

(v) KEY OBJECTIVE 2.6: TO PROVIDE FREE BASIC SERVICES TO ALL HOUSEHOLDS

ACCESS TO WATER

An investigation of access to water identified the following specific geographic areas (local and district municipalities) with highest need:

The table below indicates household figures per district municipality and different forms of water supplies across the district municipalities.

Table 15: Access to water supply per household per district municipality

Water Supply Xhariep Motheo Lejweleputswa Thabo Fezile Total Mofutsanyana Dabi Water pipes 9 582 52 826 45 716 32 377 37 074 177 575 inside Dwelling Water pipes 2 250 94 058 96 305 81 422 67 944 361 779 inside yard Water pipes 3 512 29 356 22 086 35 846 9 952 100 752 less than 200m Water pipes 2 755 25 402 24 339 25 101 7 488 85 085 greater than 200m from yard Borehole 412 650 1 587 1 426 676 4 751 Spring 30 102 39 981 27 1 179 Rainwater 57 141 174 629 121 1 122 Tank Dam/pool/ 128 209 455 874 218 1 884 stagnant water River/ Stream 58 99 69 403 58 687 Water Vendor 18 369 545 239 106 1 277 Unspecified 617 7 179 5 318 6 873 1 164 21 151 Total 39 218 210 391 196 634 186 171 124 827 757 241 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The majority of communities (361779(47.8%)) have access to water by means of pipes that are located inside the yards. There is also a large number of households (177575(23.4 %)) that have access to piped water inside the dwellings in all the district municipalities. In Thabo Mofutsanyane district municipality a large number of households (60947(32.7%)) access community pipe stands outside their yard (distances both less than 200 m and distances greater than 200 m from the yard). Other means of water supplies include boreholes, springs, rivers, water vendor, etc.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 25

Table 16: No access to piped water per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households PHUMELELA 8.4 1 016 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 7.1 6 540 DIHLABENG 5.9 1 979 LETSEMENG 5.1 611 MATJHABENG 4.7 6 008 SETSOTO 4.7 1 571 TOKOLOGO 4.7 438 MANGAUNG 4.2 7 938 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table represents the percentage of households that do not have access to piped water per local municipality per top 8.

Table 17: Community water pipe distance greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households

SETSOTO 17.3 5 806 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 14.4 13 622 TSWELOPELE 14.0 1 760 MATJHABENG 13.9 17 885 MANGAUNG 12.3 23 224 PHUMELELA 11.3 1 358 NALEDI 10.4 800 MASILONYANA 8.8 1 807 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table shows the percentage of households that access water from piped community stands more than 200m from the yard per local municipality per top 8.

Two tables above also give a close scrutiny on local municipalities across the province that do not access piped water supply or access it by means of communal stands that are more than 200m from the yard. The top 8 local municipalities as reflected in the tables above are regarded as those that have most potential need in accessing piped water supply.

Maps attached per Annexure C are: (1) Thematic map C.8 that shows percentage of households with no access to piped water per local municipality. (2) Thematic map C.9 that shows percentage of households with access to piped water from community stands greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 26

(3) Thematic map C.10 that shows percentage of households that have no piped water and with piped water stands greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality.

Tables attached are: (1) Table (page 96) of thematic map C.8 that shows percentage of households that have no access to piped water per local municipality. (2) Table (page 97) of thematic map C.9 that shows percentage of households with access to piped water from community stands greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality. (3) Table (page 98) of thematic map C.10 of households with no piped water stands and piped water stands greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality.

ACCESS TO SANITATION

An investigation of access to sanitation identified the following specific geographic areas (local and district municipalities) with highest need:

The table below indicates sanitation levels of all district municipalities across the province.

Table 18: Access to sanitation levels per household per district municipality

Sanitation Xhariep Motheo Lejweleputsa Thabo Fezile Total Mofutsanyana Dabi Flush toilets 25 039 98 928 96 215 50 893 77 263 348 338 (sewage system) Flush toilets 734 4 320 2 531 2 985 1 667 12 237 (septic tank) Chemical 114 2 423 675 2 672 464 6 348 toilet Pit latrine 1 561 23 913 2 091 14 394 3 765 45 724 (ventilation) Pit latrine (no 2 547 23 410 21 010 61 547 13 446 121 960 ventilation) Bucket latrine 2 939 36 948 55 181 35 657 19 800 150 525 None 6 285 20 448 18 931 18 023 8 420 72 107 Total 39 218 210 391 196 634 186 171 124 827 757 241 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The form of sanitation that is widely used across the province is flushed toilets connected to sewerage system. Xhariep and Fezile Dabi district municipalities have more than 60% (25039 and 77263 respectively) of households that make use of the above-mentioned facility. However there is significantly high percentage (16% (6285)) of households in

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 27

Xhariep than any other district municipality that do not have access to any form of sanitation. The other district municipalities have an average of 9% of households that do not have access to any form of sanitation. Bucket latrines are widely used in four of the five local municipalities of Lejweleputswa (Masilonyana, Tokologo, Nala, and Tswelopele) and in two local municipalities of Thabo Mofutsanyana district municipality, namely Setsoto and Nketoane. Pit latrines without ventilation are widely used in Thabo Mofutsanyane district municipality (21010 (33%)), whereas other district municipalities have an average of 10% of households using the same facility.

The figures from the above table indicate that an average of 50% (360575) of households make use of flush toilets as the form of sanitation. Households that make use of bucket latrines as well as pit latrines with or without ventilation constitute 42.0% (318209), while 9.9% (72107) of households do not have access to any form of sanitation and 0.8% (6348) makes use of chemical toilets.

Table 19: No access to sanitation per local municipality (no sewerage).

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households TOKOLOGO 22.1 1 979 LETSEMENG 19.9 1 201 PHUMELELA 19.2 2 313 MOHOKARE 17.7 1 689 DIHLABENG 16.6 5 559 SETSOTO 14.3 4 790 NALEDI 13.9 1 065 NKETOANA 13.8 2 076 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table represents the percentage of households with no sanitation per local municipality per top 8.

Table 20: Pit and Bucket latrines (with and without ventilation) per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households

NKETOANA 72.0 10 809 TSWELOPELE 71.4 8 944 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 71.3 65 630 NALA 68.8 17 868 SETSOTO 61.6 60 265 TOKOLOGO 59.2 8 964 MASILONYANA 54.9 11 237 MANTSOPA 52.1 7 325 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 28

The above table represents the percentage of households that make use of pit/bucket latrine (with and without ventilation) per local municipality per top 8.

Maps attached per Annexure C are: (1) Thematic map C.11 that shows percentage of households with no sewage per local municipality. (2) Thematic map C.12 that shows percentage of households that use pit and bucket (latrines with and without ventilation) per local municipality. (3) Thematic map C.13 that shows percentage of households with pit/bucket latrines (with and without ventilation) and without sanitation per local municipality.

Tables attached are: (1) Table (page 100) of thematic map C.11 that shows percentage of households with no sewerage per local municipality (2) Table (page 101) of thematic map C.12 that shows percentage of households with pit and bucket latrines (with or without ventilation) per local municipality (3) Table (page 102) of thematic map C.13 that shows percentage of households with pit/ bucket latrines and without sanitation per local municipality.

ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY

An investigation of access to electricity for lighting identified the following specific geographic areas (district and local municipalities) with highest need:

The table below indicates household that have an access to electricity per district municipality

Table 21a: Access to electricity per household per district municipality

District Municipality Number of households Total households MOTHEO 176 880 210 391 LEJWELEPUTSWA 141 339 196 634 THABO MOFUTSANYANE 118 387 186 671 FEZILE DABI 100 915 124 827 XHARIEP 29 919 39 218 TOTAL 567 440 757 241 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

At district level, information from Stats S.A. 2001 reveals that the highest numbers of households that have access to electricity are in Motheo (84.1%(176880)), Fezile Dabi (80.8% (100915)), Xhariep (76.3%(29919)), Lejweleputswa (71.9%(141339)) and Thabo Mofutsanyana (63.6%(118387)) with the least number of households that have access to electricity.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 29

Table 21b: No access to electricity per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households

MALUTI A PHOFUNG 42.2 39 390 PHUMELELA 35.2 4 231 DIHLABENG 32.9 11 002 TSWELOPELE 32.9 4 128 MATJHABENG 29.9 38 498 SETSOTO 28.3 9 497 MAFUBE 28.2 4 162 LETSEMENG 27.8 3 365 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table identifies the percentage of population without electricity per local municipality per top 8.

In table 21b, four of the five local municipalities (Maluti a Phofung, Phumelela, Ditlabeng and Setsoto) in Thabo Mofutsanyana district municipality appear in the top 8 local municipalities of the province that are in need of electricity. In the afore-mentioned district municipality an average of 32.6% households have no access to electricity. It is followed by Lejweleputswa district municipality with 26.7% (average of 13534) with two of its local municipalities (Tswelopele and Matjhabeng) appear in the top 8 of the table. Xhariep district municipality constitute about 25% (average of 11043) with one local municipality (Letsemeng) that is in top 8 of the table. Motheo and Fezile Dabi districts are just more than 20% (average of 8221) of the households that are in potential need with the latter district having one local municipality (Mafube) that appear in the top 8 of the table of need.

Map attached per Annexure C is: (1) Thematic map C.14 that shows percentage of households without electricity per local municipality

Table attached is: (1) Table (page 104) of thematic map C.14 that shows percentage of households without electricity per local municipality

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 30

ACCESS TO REFUSE REMOVAL

An investigation of access to refuse removal identified the following specific geographic areas (district and local municipalities) with highest need:

At district leveI, Thabo Mofutsanyana (37.71% (56964)) and Motheo (37.48% (78867)) have predominantly high percentages of households that have no access to refuse removal. The below table indicates statistic figures per district municipality of households with no access to refuse removal.

Table 22a: Percentages of households that access no refuse removal per district municipality

District Percentage (%) Number of Total Municipality households Xhariep 32.25 12653 39235 Motheo 37.48 78867 210398 Lejweleputswa 28.97 9368 196612 Thabo 37.71 56964 186114 Mofutsanyana Fezile Dabi 30.33 103988 124826 Total 38.38 290361 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

At local level three categories of refuse removal (own refuse dump, no rubbish disposal and communal refuse dump) from the Stats S.A. 2001 data are combined into a single category which is referred to as no refuse removal.

Table 22b: No access to refuse removal per local municipality

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households

MALUTI A PHOFUNG 76.2 70 185 TSWELOPELE 67.9 8 515 TOKOLOGO 50.1 4 491 MASILONYANA 44.8 9 176 NGWATHE 38.4 12 575 NALEDI 38.3 2 936 MANGAUNG 37.8 71 346 PHUMELELA 37.7 4 535 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table reflects the percentage of households that have no access to refuse removal per local municipality per top 8.

It is indicates that Maluti a Phofung local municipality of Thabo Mofutsanyana district municipality and Tswelopele, Tokologo and

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 31

Masilonyana local municipalities of Lejweleputswa district municipality have the highest number of households (more than 40%) that do not have access to any form of refuse removal.

Maps attached per Annexure C are: (1) Thematic map C.15 that shows percentage of households that have no access to refuse removal per local municipality.

Table attached is: (1) Table (page 106) of thematic map C.15 that shows percentage of households that have no access to refuse removal per local municipality.

ACCESS TO LANDLINE (TELEPHONE)

An investigation of access to landlines (telephone) identified the following specific geographic areas (local municipalities) with highest need:

Two sub-categories of this section (another location not nearby and no access to telephones) have been fused into a single category that is referred to as no access to landline.

Table 23: No access to landline (telephone) per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Number of households

TOKOLOGO 23.5 2 109 NALA 22.2 5 776 PHUMELELA 20.6 2 473 TSWELOPELE 20.4 2 553 SETSOTO 19.8 6 631 MOHOKARE 18.4 1 754 NALEDI 16.7 1 281 MAFUBE 15.9 2 345 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table identifies the percentage of households that has no access to landlines per local municipality per top 8.

About 10% (76697) of the total households within the province do not have access or have telephone services in close proximity. This is more apparent in local municipalities of Lejweleputswa (Tokologo, Tswelopele and Nala), Thabo Mofutsanyana (Phumelela and Setsoto), Xhariep (Mohokare), Motheo (Naledi) and Fezile Dabi (Mafube) districts.

Map attached per Annexure C is: (1) Thematic map C.16 that shows percentage of households that have no access to landlines per local municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 32

Table attached is: (1) Table (page 106) of thematic map C.16 that shows percentage of households that have no access to landlines per local municipality

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

An investigation of population distribution identified the following specific geographic areas (district and local municipalities) with highest distribution:

Table 24: Population distribution per district municipality

Local Econ 0-6 13-18 7-12 Elderly Total Municipality active XHARIEP 19 069 18 114 18 460 64 659 14 937 98 058 MOTHEO 91 784 90 319 90 111 384 232 71 815 546 156 LEJWELEPUTSWA 88 017 83 547 81 191 349 360 54 891 485 443 THABO MOFUTSANYANA 103 138 109 974 104 748 340 568 67 342 512 660 FEZILE DABI 58 899 60 832 56 830 234 256 49 508 340 592 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Table 25: Economical inactive population distribution per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Population number MAFUBE 80.1 32 175 PHUMELELA 78.2 28 033 TSWELOPELE 77.8 28 910 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 77.5 195 018 NALEDI 77.1 15 046 NKETOANA 77.0 33 526 SETSOTO 73.9 64 655 NGWATHE 72.5 62 849 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The above table identifies the percentage of population that is not economic active per local municipality per top 8.

Three age categories namely 0-6 years, 7-18 years and over 65 years people per local municipality have been combined into a single category that is referred to as economically inactive population group (which includes both male and female genders) and is reflected in the above table.

The table indicates that local municipality of Thabo Mofutsanyana (Phumelela, Maluti a Phofung, Nketoana and Setsoto) are in the top 8 of the table that have economically inactive people. On average about 75%(385201) of the people in this district municipality are economically inactive. The local municipalities of Xhariep (Letsemeng,

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 33

Kopanong and Mohokare) and Motheo (with Naledi in the top 8) district municipalities (see attached table on economically inactive population). Lejweleputswa (with Nketoana in top 8 table) and Fezile Dabi (with Ngwathe in top 8 table) district municipalities are economically inactive. Tswelopele local municipality in Lejweleputswa district as well as Mafube and Ngwathe local municipalities in Fezile Dabi district also appear in the top 8 of municipalities that are economically inactive.

Table 26: Population distribution per local municipality (0-6 years).

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Population number TSWELOPELE 23.82 8 747 PHUMELELA 21.94 7 860 LETSMENG 21.93 6 746 MAFUBE 20.93 8 410 TOKOLOGO 20.84 4 904 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 20.52 51 663 NKETOANA 20.23 8 806 NALA 20.02 13 978 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Table 27: Population distribution per local municipality (7-18 years).

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Population number MALUTI A PHOFUNG 44.39 111 768 MAFUBE 43.69 17 555 NKETOANA 43.02 18 723 NALEDI 42.24 8 239 TSWELOPELE 41.75 15 406 PHUMELELA 41.03 14 698 SETSOTO 40.52 35 470 NALA 39.84 27 813 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 34

Table 28: Population distribution per local municipality (Over 65 years).

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Population number NGWATHE 17.82 15 454 KOPANONG 17.26 7 083 NALEDI 16.27 3 174 MAFUBE 15.46 6 210 PHUMELA 15.28 5 475 MOQHAKA 14.63 18 449 MOHOKARE 14.51 3 811 MANTSOPA 14.24 5 702 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

The three tables above indicate separate categories of economically inactive population. This will also help in assessing need potentials such as to where more clinics, schools, old age homes, etc should be established in each local municipality.

Table 29: Population distribution per local municipality (19-65 years).

Local Municipality Percentage (%) Population number MAFUBE 19.52 40177 PHUMELELA 21.75 35826 TSWELOPELE 22.17 37146 MALUTI A PHOFUNG 22.54 251782 NALEDI 22.88 19507 NKETOANA 22.97 43521 SETSOTO 26.17 87531 NGWATHE 27.51 86707 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001 The table above indicates the top 8 local municipality with low economical active percentages

Maps attached per Annexure C are: (1) Thematic map C.17 that shows percentage of population from 0-6 years per local municipality. (2) Thematic map C.18 that shows percentage of population from 7-18 years per local municipality (3) Thematic map C.19 that shows percentage of population from 19-65 years per local municipality (4) Thematic map C.20 that shows percentage of population over 65 years per local municipality.

Tables attached are: (1) Table (page 110) of thematic map C.17 that shows percentage of not economically active population per local municipality. (2) Table (page 111) of thematic map C.18 that shows percentage of population from 0-6 years per local municipality. (3) Table of thematic map that shows percentage of population from 7-18 years per local municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 35

(4) Table (page112) of thematic map C.19 that shows percentage of population from 19-65 years per local municipality. (5) Table (page 113) of thematic map C.20 that shows percentage of population over 65 years per local municipality.

3. PRIORITY AREA: JUSTICE AND CRIME PREVENTION

The following key objectives were set:

• To reduce the crime rate by at least 7% per annum • To reduce the number of road accidents deaths by 3% per annum.

(i) KEY OBJECTIVE 3.1: TO REDUCE THE CRIME RATE BY AT LEAST 7% PER ANNUM.

An investigation of crime took place on provincial and local municipality levels.

The following information was extracted from the reviewed FSGDS (2006).

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 36

FIGURE 1: The percentage of crime per category in the Free State, 2004

M urder 0.6 Rape 2.5 Attempted murder 0.8 Assault with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm 11.2 Common assault 15.6 Robbery with aggravating circumstances 2.8 Common robbery 3.0 Indecent assault 0.4 Kidnapping 0.0 Abduction 0.2 Neglect and ill treatment of children 0.3 Culpable homicide 0.5 Public violence 0.0 Carjacking 0.1 Truck hijacking 0.1 Bank robbery 0.1 Robbery cash in transit 0.1 House robbery 0.1 Business robbery 0.0 Arson 0.3 M alicious damage to property 6.6 Crimen injuria 4.7 B urglary at residential premises 11.1 B urglary at business premises 2.5 Theft of motor vehicle or motor cycle 2.0 Theft out or from vehicle 4.6 Stock theft 2.9 Illegal possession of firearm and ammunition 0.3 Drug-related crimes 2.5

Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs 0.7 All theft not mentioned elsewhere 19.8 Commercial crime 1.6 Shoplifting 2.0

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 ( SAPS, 2006)

Overall 158 000 cases of crime were reported. It seems from the above table that general theft is the main category of crime in the Free State with nearly 20% of the crime in the province falling into this category. This is followed by common assault (15.6%) and burglary at residential premises (11.1%). Although stock theft as a percentage of the total crime is fairly limited, it should be recognised that it is mainly a rural crime and should be understood against the percentage of people being rural.

The following crime areas show very low readings: • Public violence • Carjacking (Sub-Category of Robbery Aggravating) • Truck hijacking (Sub-Category of Robbery Aggravating) • Bank robbery (Sub-Category of Robbery Aggravating) • Robbery of cash in transit (Sub-Category of Robbery Aggravating) • House robbery (Sub-Category of Robbery Aggravating) • Business robbery (Sub-Category of Robbery Aggravating)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 37

Figure 2 below provides an overview of murder and rape per 10000 of the population per municipality in the Free State.

FIGURE 2: Murder and rape per 10 000 of the population in each municipality of the Free State, 2004

Mafube Metsimaholo Ngwathe Moqhaka Phumelela Maluti-a-Phofung Nketoana Dihlabeng Setsoto Nala Matjhabng Tswelopele Tokologo Masilonyana Mantsopa Mangaung Naledi Mohokare Kopanong Letsemeng

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0

Murder Rape

Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 ( SAPS, 2006)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 38

(ii) KEY OBJECTIVE 3.2: TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ROAD ACCIDENTS DEATHS BY 3% PER ANNUM.

An investigation of number of road accidents took place on provincial level.

Considering the large volumes of people travelling through the Free State, traffic management is vital. This should include law enforcement, road safety education and overload control. At the moment a large number of posts in respect of traffic management are vacant. Currently there are 286 traffic officers in the Free State. At an educational level, the Arrive Alive programme is still prioritised. During 2005 1014 people died in car accidents in the Free State (reviewed FSGDS, 2006)

According to the reviewed FSGDS (2006), the province’s road network comprises about 1 615km of national roads, 6 316km of surfaced roads, 21 486km of gravel secondary roads and 22 000km of gravel tertiary roads. A high percentage of roads (60%) are in poor or very poor condition. Tertiary roads are only maintained partially. Only 4% of paved roads are in a very good condition, while 9% are in a good condition, 27% are in a fair condition, 40% are in a poor condition and 20% are in a very poor condition. In general, the state of the road network has deteriorated and many disadvantaged communities lack adequate access to roads and internal connector streets. The quality of the gravel roads is of particular concern.

The table below indicates the quality status quo of the provincial road infrastructure.

Table 30: Quality status of the provincial road infrastructure

Very Very Total Good Fair Poor Good Poor km Surfaced 4% 11% 28% 40% 17% 6 411 roads Gravel roads ------18% 25% 22% 37% 22 100 Unsurfaced ------20% 50% 30% 26 000 dirt roads Road furniture (safety ------29% 36% 4% 31% ------measure) Bridges ------21% 10% ------Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Free State Province, 2005)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 39

4. PRIORITY AREA: EFFICIENT GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

The following key objectives were set:

• To eliminate qualified auditing reports for provincial departments by 2009 and for municipalities by 2011. • To eliminate the 12 municipalities which are under extraordinary provincial and national support (currently called Project Consolidate) by 2010.

No specific geographic areas (local municipalities) with highest need are applicable to the above objectives.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 40

4.2 AREAS OF POTENTIAL

4.2.1 NATIONAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE

1. NATIONAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT VISION

Government’s national spatial development vision can be described (National Spatial Development Perspective [NSDP] page 35) as follows:

South Africa will become a nation in which investment in infrastructure and development programmes support government’s growth and development objectives: • by fostering development on the basis of local potential • by focusing economic growth and employment creation in areas where this is most effective and sustainable • by supporting restructuring where feasible to ensure greater competitiveness • by ensuring that development institutions are able to provide basic needs throughout the country.

2. NORMATIVE PRINCIPLES

The NSDP proposes the following normative principles to be used as a guide by all spheres of government when making decisions on infrastructure investment and development spending:

(a) Government spending on fixed investment, beyond the constitutional obligations to provide basic services to all citizens, should be focused on localities of economic growth and/or potential for sustainable economic development in order to attract private sector investment, stimulate sustainable economic activities and/or create long-term employment opportunities. In these areas government’s objective of both promoting economic growth and alleviating poverty will best be achieved.

(b) In localities where there are both high levels of poverty and development potential, this could include fixed capital investment beyond basic services to exploit the potential of those localities.

In localities with low development potential, government spending beyond basic services should focus on social investment, such as human resource development, labour market intelligence and social transfers, so as to give people in these areas better information and opportunities. This will enable people to become more mobile and migrate, if they choose to, to localities that are more likely to provide sustainable employment or other economic opportunities.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 41

The further concentration of people in need in areas of low potential should therefore not be encouraged.

3. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL

3.1. NSDP CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL INDICATORS

Categories of development potential proposed by the NSDP are:

(a) Innovation and experimentation

(b) Production – high value, differentiated goods (not strongly dependent on labour costs)

(c) Production – labour intensive, mass-produced goods (more dependent on labour costs and/or natural resource exploitation)

(d) Public services and administration

(e) Retail and services

(f) Tourism

The reviewed FSGDS utilized the above 6 NSDP Categories of Development Potential to identify for all Free State towns and local municipalities the categories applicable for a specific town/ municipality. In this regard, the High Development Potential and Above Average Development Potential Categories applicable to all Free State towns/ municipalities are listed in the reviewed FSGDS.

Maps attached per Annexure B are: (1) Innovation and experimentation areas in the Free State, 2006 (2) Areas of high value differentiated goods in the Free State, 2006 (3) Areas of labour intensive mass produced goods in the Free State, 2006 (4) Areas for public services and administration in the Free State, 2006 (5) Areas for retail and private services in the Free State, 2006 (6) Areas for tourism potential in the Free State, 2006

3.2 COMBINED DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL

Table 4.3 of the reviewed FSGDS categorises the overall/ combined development potential as reflected for each of the categories for all Free State towns.

Towns are thus classified as having a High Combined Development Potential, Above Average Combined Development Potential, Below

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 42

Average Combined Development Potential and Limited Combined Development Potential.

Map attached per Annexure B is: (1) Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006

4. COMBINED DEVELOPMENT NEED (7 INDICATORS)

Table 4.4 of the reviewed FSGDS categorises the Free State towns in terms of development need.

The developmental needs of the Free State towns are based on the following indicators:

• Number of disabled people per locality • The percentage of people without schooling or with limited schooling per locality • The percentage of people who are unemployed • Number of households residing in informal dwellings (whether in a backyard or on a surveyed and serviced or unsurveyed and unserviced site) • Number of people without access to adequate sanitation (current access in terms of an unventilated pit latrine, bucket or none) • Number of people without access to water within 200m from their stand • Number of people with an income below R3 500.

Towns are thus classified as having a High Development Need, Above Average Development Need, Below Average Development Need and Limited Development Need.

Map attached per Annexure B is: (1) Areas with development need in the Free State, 2006

5. COMBINED DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT NEED

Table 4.6 of the reviewed FSGDS rates the Free State towns in terms of its respective Combined Development Potential and Development Need.

Towns are thus allocated a High Rating, Above Average Rating, Below Average Rating and Low Rating.

Maps attached per Annexure B are: (1) Development potential and need per settlement in the Free State, 2006. (2) Development Nodes according to the NSDP classification.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 43

The assumption underlying the NSDP approach is that localities that have exhibited past activities in a particular category are more likely to have the potential to continue doing so in future.

Future economic growth should primarily be explored in those areas with a medium to high resource base and high human need where there may be economic potential to be exploited. Economic activity should be encouraged and supported by infrastructure investment where there is already a medium to high level of economic activity and where (natural or human) resource potential is medium to high.

In the above regard, 3 types of resource potential can be distinguished:

(a) Natural resource potential can be divided into agricultural potential, environmental sensitivity and the availability of water.

(b) Human resource potential can be divided into level of skills and human density.

(c) Infrastructure resource potential refers to existing and proposed road and rail infrastructure and the main electricity grid.

(d) Human need refers to the spread of poverty and the size of the poverty gap.

Specific value statement of the Free State Provincial Government has relevance: “Promote economic infrastructure investment and development spending in areas of potential and need according to the principles of the NSDP.”

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 44

7. FSSDF SPATIAL INITIATIVES

The FSSDF 2007 aligned its Spatial Initiatives with the NSDP Categories of Development Potential as portrayed in the reviewed FSGDS (2006). Refer to Chapter 4.2.2: Proposed Spatial initiatives and Chapter 4.2.3: Summary of FSSDF Spatial Initiatives and corresponding NSDP Categories.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 45

4.2.2 PROPOSED SPATIAL INITIATIVES

A visualizing of the Free State Province by way of proposed spatial initiatives was undertaken, utilizing a set of structuring elements. The Provincial Spatial Development Framework Maps of these spatial initiatives is attached per Annexure D.

These structuring elements are as follows:

1. CENTRES

Centres represent a classification of localities according to specific and specialized services of regional or provincial importance. Different types of centres were distinguished:

(a) Administrative centre

• Bloemfontein, Trompsburg, Welkom, Sasolburg, Phuthaditjaba.

(b) Educational centre

• Bloemfontein, Welkom, Phuthaditjaba

Welkom intends the establishment of a Centre of Excellence to serve as a training facility for emerging farmers from all over the Free State, as well as the establishment of a Training and Support Centre for various training needs of the community on NQF levels and through learnerships.

• Bloemfontein

(d) Services centre

Those urban nodes, which have not been identified as Economic Nodes (Economic Hub, Collective Economic Nodes, Specialised Economic Nodes) or NSDP Category of Potential Specific Nodes, will continue to exist as services centres to their surroundings.

These towns should be developed with social services in support of those areas where growth will be experience. It is therefore proposed that attention should be paid to education, health and social infrastructure in these services centres so that the quality of life of people staying there can be improved, and necessary skills be obtained.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 46

2. NODES

These are localities where development (facilities, services and economic opportunities) tends to concentrate. Different types of nodes were distinguished:

(a) Collective Economic Nodes and Specialized Economic Nodes

Economic nodes are localities where economic growth will be promoted. A variety of activities will tend to cluster in and around these nodes. The nodes offer development potential and needs to be stimulated in order to concentrate growth. The potential for growth is informed by the strengths and opportunities presented by each node. These nodes should therefore be developed in order to draw investment to regions.

Based on the 6 NSDP Categories of Development Potential, towns were categorized as Collective Economic Nodes (4 NSDP Categories and more) with High or Above Average Combined Development Potential and corresponding High or Above Average Development Need, and Specialized Economic Nodes (3 NSDP Categories and less) with corresponding High or Above Average Development Need and with specialisation in manufacturing and trade outside the province.

It is therefore sensible to focus capital investment to favour those nodes where development will more likely be sustained in future. This implies that both public and private initiatives in areas identified as economic nodes should be supported. This will have the effect that a greater need for new residential sites, housing and infrastructure will arise in these areas, thus requiring the allocation of grants for capital investment projects to favour these localities more than those with limited growth potential.

(i) Collective Economic Nodes: As identified, 4 and more NSDP Categories of Potential, with High or Above Average Combined Development Potential and corresponding High or Above Average Development Need formed the basis of the classification as Collective economic node. Refer to Chapter 4.2.3: Summary of FSSDF Spatial initiatives and corresponding NSDP Categories for details regarding categories of development potential applicable to the following towns.

• Sasolburg and Kroonstad in Fezile Dabi District. Sasolburg and Kroonstad with its strong service character and prominent commercial and industrial components will remain growth points of the Fezile Dabi District. The intended reviving of the railway network will also benefit the towns.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 47

• Welkom in Lejweleputswa District. In spite of the decline in the gold mining industry of the Welkom area, it will maintain its economic importance for the region. Mining is no longer seen as the dominant and only growth sector for the region. The town serves as main service centre within the district, providing specialised services such as a hospital, institutions, regional government representation, regional banking institutions, specialised commercial and industries. Various incentives, such as Goldfields Tourism route, upgrading of the R30/R34 route, Jewellery Hub, rail network upgrading, re-establishment of Phakisa as the home of Africa’s MotoGP, and training centres (Centre of Excellence, Training and Support Centre), can stimulate economic growth.

• Bethlehem and Harrismith in Thabo Mofutsanyana District. These towns with its strong service character and prominent commercial and industrial components will remain growth points.

(ii) Specialized Economic Nodes: As identified, 3 and less NSDP Categories of Potential, with corresponding High or Above Average Development Need, as well as with specialisation in manufacturing and trade outside the province formed the basis for the earmarking of towns as Specialized Economic Nodes. Refer to Chapter 4.2.3: Summary of FSSDF Spatial initiatives and corresponding NSDP Categories for details regarding categories of development potential applicable to the following towns:

• Botshabelo and Ladybrand in Motheo District. The availability of a labour force and manufacturing potential at Botshabelo, and Ladybrand’s proximity to a Lesotho border post can benefit these towns economically. Labybrand can develop by providing a market to supply Lesotho with processed and perishable goods and also capitalise on its natural features and cultural/historic sites. The above towns should promote these potential growth areas and focus on developing supporting infrastructure to encourage investment.

• Viljoenskroon and Heilbron in Fezile Dabi District. A specialisation in manufacturing establish these towns as Specialized Economic Nodes.

• Ficksburg in Thabo Mofutsanyana District. The location of border posts with Lesotho at Ficksburg result in a huge influx of people, which from an economic point of view is beneficial.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 48

(b) Retail and Private Services Nodes

• Bloemfontein as Economic Hub, Botshabelo and Ladybrand as Specialized Economic Nodes and Thaba Nchu in Motheo District.

• Sasolburg and Kroonstad as Collective Economic Nodes and Viljoenskroon as Specialized Economic Node in Fezile Dabi District.

• Welkom as Collective Economic Node, as well as Odendaalsrus, Bothaville and Virginia in Lejweleputswa District.

• Bethlehem and Harrismith as Collective Economic Nodes, Ficksburg as Specialised Economic Node and Phuthaditjhaba in Thabo Mofutsanyana District. (FSGDS Review, 2006).

Overall household income in a locality is one of the indicators for measuring potential. In this regard, is consumer spending a driver for retail and private sector service development and diversification. The seven settlements jointly contributing 75% of the provincial GVA in the retail, and financial services sub- sectors are Bloemfontein (45.8%), Welkom (11.5%), Sasolburg (7.7%), Kroonstad (3.7%), Bethlehem (3.1%), Thaba Nchu (2.3%) and Puthaditjhaba (2.3%).

• High Value Differentiated Goods

(a) Sasolburg as Collective Economic Node in Fezile Dabi District (b) Bloemfontein as Economic Hub in Motheo District (c) Welkom as Collective Economic Node in Lejweleputswa District

Sasolburg and Bloemfontein (and their respective municipalities namely Metsimaholo and Mangaung), are the leading localities for high value differentiated goods (fuel, rubber, plastics, electronics) with ratings of high potential. This high rating is based on the petro-chemical plant at Sasol 1, as well as a substantial role of Bloemfontein in fuel, rubber and plastics. The dominant role of Sasolburg in this sector will be strengthened as and when the processing of natural gas from Mozambique will come fully on-stream. Outside Sasolburg and Bloemfontein, there is no significant potential in a national context. Welkom has above-average potential in this regard, but the scale of its contribution is marginal (PGSD Review)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 49

• Labour Intensive Mass Produced Goods

(a) Sasolburg and Kroonstad as Collective Economic Nodes, as well as Heilbron and Viljoenskroon as Specialised Economic Nodes in Fezile Dabi District (b) Bloemfontein as Economic Hub and Botshabelo as Specialised Economic Node in Motheo District (c) Welkom as Collective Economic Node and Wesselsbron in Lejweleputswa District. (d) Bethlehem and Harrismith as Collective Economic Nodes, and Puthaditjaba in Thabo Mofutsanyana District. (e) Jacobsdal (agri-processing) in Xhariep District.

In manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Sasolburg is again the leading contributor by far with 36.6% of the provincial GVA, followed by Bloemfontein, Welkom, Bethlehem, Viljoenskroon, Botshabelo, Kroonstad, Puthaditjhaba and Harrismith, which (together with Sasolburg), contribute almost 80% of the provincial GVA in this sub-sector. Any further manufacturing developments should preferably be targeted at these places to enhance linkages and contribute to a positive agglomeration effect (FSGDS Review, 2006). The irrigation scheme in the Jacobsdal area establishes the potential for growth.

(d) Mining Nodes (Labour intensive mass produced goods)

• Welkom as Collective Economic Node, as well as Theunissen, Odendaalsrus and Virginia in Lejweleputswa District.

• Viljoenskroon as Specialised Economic Node in Fezile Dabi District.

In mining, Welkom (38.5%), Viljoenskroon (18.4%), Theunissen (12.1%), and Odendaalsrus and Virginia (both at 10%) jointly produced 90% of the mining sector’s GVA in the Free State. The potential of building further on mining as a basis for development appears to be limited, unless meaningful new exploration takes effect (FSGDS Review, 2006). The new Voorspoed Mine near Kroonstad can in future impact on the mining sector’s GVA.

(e) Agricultural Nodes (Labour intensive mass produced goods)

In agriculture, a total of 20 magisterial districts are required to achieve the 75% of the provincial agricultural GVA, with Bloemfontein (11.8%), Bethlehem (8.5%), Hoopstad (5.2%), Senekal (4.9%) and Bultfontein (4.7%) being the top five

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 50

agricultural production districts (in terms of magisterial districts) over the nine years 1996 to 2004. The potential of building further on dry-land agriculture as a basis for development, appears to be limited (FSGDS Review, 2006).

(f) Tourism Nodes

Tourism nodes offer leisure and tourism products to the consumer. Tourism Nodes will attract tourists to a town or region due to its unique features, historic value, special character or surroundings.

Tourism development potential of these nodes needs to be enhanced in order to improve its attractiveness to tourists visiting these areas. Particular attention should be paid to the marketing of these nodes to tourists and therefore it should be included in the tourism strategy of the regions. Many of these nodes incorporate environmental sensitive areas and thus a cautious approach should be followed not to impact negatively on the environment. Valuable agricultural land should preferably be preserved for agricultural productivity.

Careful consideration should be given to advertising and building design when new developments are established in towns earmarked as tourism nodes, as this can negatively impact on the marketability of such towns as tourist destinations. The existing ambiance of these towns should therefore be enhanced with sensitive development.

• Areas surrounding regional dams are well suited for tourism. Development in these areas should be sensitive towards these natural features.

• Gariepdam and Philippolis are identified as important Tourism Nodes within the Xhariep District, based on its predominantly resource and heritage tourism potentials respectively.

The Lake Xhariep Tourism Project for the Gariep Dam will establish an important cross-border tourism node with the Northern Cape and Eastern Cape Provinces.

• The entire Eastern Free State is well known for its tourist attractions, with Betlehem and Harrismith (predominantly events and entertainment) and Clarens and Rosendal (predominantly special town character and natural surroundings) regarded as Tourism Nodes. Phuthaditjhaba, Ficksburg, Clocolan, Fouriesburg and Memel are considered Tourism Nodes based on its natural surroundings (natural resources).

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 51

The Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Park in the Clarens/Qwa-qwa area of Thabo Mofutsanyana District is a potential tourism node of importance.

• Sasolburg and Parys (predominantly for events, natural resource/ river and entertainment) and Kroonstad (predominantly for events and resource/ river) are identified as important Tourism Nodes within the Fezile Dabi District, given their existing and future weekend tourism potential.

The Vredefort Dome World Heritage Site in the Fezile Dabi District is a potential tourism node of importance for the province. Its establishment as a World Heritage Site will exploit the tourism potential of the Vredefort Dome.

• Bloemfontein is identified as important Tourism Node within the Motheo District, based on predominantly events tourism and entertainment. Thaba Nchu is considered a Tourism Node predominantly based on the Maria Moroka Nature Reserve (natural resource)

• Welkom and Virginia (predominantly events, entertainment and mining tourism) are identified as important Tourism Nodes within the Lejweleputswa District. Odendaalsrus is considered a Tourism Node predominantly based on events at Pakisa racetrack and mining tourism.

Nature Reserves and Conservancies nodes are localities protected by legislation for its environmental quality.

• The Gariep Dam Nature Reserve, Tussen die Riviere Nature Reserve, and Kalkfontein Dam Nature Reserve, together with a large number of conservancies/ game farms are located in the Xhariep District. Development in these areas should be sensitive towards these natural features.

• The Willem Pretorius Game Reserve, Sterkfontein Dam Nature Reserve, Seekoeivlei Nature Reserve, Golden Gate National Park, together with a number of conservancies are located in the Thabo Mofutsanyana District.

• The Caledon Nature Reserve, Soetdoring Nature Reserve, Rusfontein Dam Nature Reserve and Maria Moroka National Park are located in the Motheo District.

• Koppies Dam Nature Reserve and large number of conservancies are located in the Fezile Dabi District. Current initiatives for further development at the Koppies Dam Nature Reserve should be supported to ensure the development of the dam as one of the main tourist attractions of the region.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 52

The newly established Nature Reserve at Rooipoort Dam, should be further developed and marketed as tourist destination.

Future extensions and enlargement of the Franklin Creek Conservancy, especially in proximity of the Wilge River tributaries should be supported and promoted.

Future conservancies, especially in proximity of the Renoster River and tributaries should be supported and promoted.

The inflows of the Vaal and Wilge Rivers into the Vaal Dam are considered to be sensitive especially relating the specific ecosystems in association therewith. Development proposals in these areas should preferably be of medium density with reduced and limited impact on the riparian areas and subsequent impact on the water source, as well as in line with the guidelines of the Department of Local Government and Housing on development of peri-urban and agricultural land.

• The Sandveld Nature Reserve, Erfenis Dam Nature Reserve, as well as a few conservancies are located in the Lejweleputswa District.

• The establishment of the Vredefort Dome World Heritage Site in the proximity of Parys in Fezile Dabi District will ensure effective conservation and exploitation of the tourism potential of the Vredefort Dome.

The marshes within the rural hinterland around Wesselsbron in Lejweleputswa District are environmentally sensitive and should be preserved.

(g) Bio-fuel Nodes

• Bothaville and Bultfontein in Lejweleputswa District.

• Sasolburg and Frankfort in Fezile Dabi District.

(h) Presidential nodes are localities identified by the office of the State President as priority areas for infrastructural and social upliftment.

• The Puthaditjhaba area in Thabo Mofutsanyana District has been identified where reconstruction and formalization programmes and commercial development should be concentrated, mainly due to the high concentration of people in these areas as well as the fact that most state

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 53

owned land is to be found in this area. Formalization of also the tribal areas within Qwa-qwa is to be undertaken.

(i) Industrial Development Zone (IDZ) nodes focus on the manufacturing industry and therefore encourage industrial development within the node.

• Botshabelo should focus on future industrial development through the establishment of an IDZ. In this regard, the locality of the town on a major transport axis and its proximity to labour and airports for export are beneficial.

(j) Land reform nodes

(i) Restitution nodes

The restitution programme has as vision to have persons or communities dispossessed of property after 19 June 1913, as a result of past laws and practices, restored to such property or receive just and equitable redress.

Restitution can take the following forms:

• Restoration of the land from which claimants were dispossessed. Wherever possible, preference should be give to the restoration of land. • Provision of alternative land. • Payment of compensation • Alternative relief including a combination of the above- mentioned, sharing of the land, or budgetary assistance such as services and infrastructure development; or • Priority access to state resources with regard to housing and land development programmes

Applicable legislation is: • The Restitution of Land Rights Act, 1994 (Act No. 22 of 1994). • Land Restitution and Reform Laws Amendment Act, 1999.

Restitution claims (settled and outstanding) in the Free State are indicated on Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Agriculture and Mining Map (Annexure D) and listed in Section 5 (Tables).

(ii) Redistribution nodes

The redistribution programme aims to develop efficient products, systems and procedures for a more equitable distribution of land, addressing the problem of landlessness; and enhancing household income security, employment and growth throughout the country, as well as contributing to

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 54 redistribution 30% of the country’s agricultural land over 15 years.

The following are the products of redistribution:

• Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) projects This programme is a joint venture with Department of Agriculture. Through this programme qualifying beneficiaries may acquire land for agricultural purposes.

• Commonages This product aims at improving people’s access to municipal and tribal land for grazing purposes, thus municipal and tribal commonages.

• Farm equity schemes Participants purchase equity in the form of shares and receive returns in the form of dividends and capital growth.

• Settlement Products This product provides people with land for settlement purposes. The settlement product provides grants (Settlement Land Acquisition Grants [SLAG]) to assist landless people living under insecure tenure conditions to acquire secure tenure.

Applicable legislation is: • Provision of Land and Assistance Act, 1993 (Act No. 126 of 1993).

Redistribution projects in the Free State are indicated on Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Agriculture and Mining Map (Annexure D) and listed in Section 5 (Tables).

(iii) Tenure reform nodes

The tenure reform programme aims to provide persons or communities or farm occupiers and farm dwellers with legally secure tenure in the following 3 main focus areas, namely • the former homelands and the ex-South African Development Trust areas, • the former coloured areas • on-site or off-site in the commercial farming areas and peri- urban areas

The programme seeks to give effect to persons or communities’ constitutional right/ entitlement to access land on an equitable basis. In this regard the Constitution provides an entitlement to a person or community whose tenure of land is legally insecure

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 55

as result of past laws or practices to tenure which is legally secure.

Applicable legislation are: • Communal Land Rights Act, 2004 (Act No. 11 of 2004), • Land Tenure Act, 1996 (Act No.3 of 1996) to promote support and co-ordinate land rights for labour tenants, • Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 (Act No. 62 of 1997) to provide support and co-ordinate land rights for farm workers and occupiers in terms of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 (Act No. 62 of 1997).

In the above regard, agri-villages are defined as private settlements, established and managed as legal entities that are situated within agricultural/ rural areas. These settlements are of restricted size and of low scale. Residences are restricted to bona fide rural workers and their dependants, working on the farms, forestry, or conservation enterprises situated in the area. These settlements of communities can however also rely on agricultural practices, be either crop or pastoral farming practices in order to create economic opportunities for them. In this regard, the land is utilized for communal grazing and other agricultural activities by the community, which include subsistence and commercial farming or even agro-processing. These agri-villages are established in terms of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 (Act No. 62 of 1997).

Agri-villages in the Free State are indicated on Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Agriculture and Mining Map (Annexure D) and listed in Section 5 (Tables).

The idea is not to create dispersed residential settlements throughout the province. A concentration of human settlement may only be allowed at locations other than urban areas when sustainable economic opportunities and social services can be integrated with the newly planned settlement. This implies that agri-villages will have to supply some form of economic opportunity to its residents within its immediate surroundings.

3. HUBS

These are higher order nodes with concentrated development (facilities, services and economic opportunities) of such importance and with a sphere of influence of provincial extent. Specialization of services or products can take place. The larger the influence sphere of a hub, the more intense the development associated with the hub and the greater the density and area that the hub will occupy. A range of specialization hubs have been identified in terms of the products the region offer.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 56

(a) Economic hub

• Bloemfontein represents an economic hub in the province. All 6 NSDP Categories of Potential are applicable, with a High Combined Development Potential and corresponding High Development Need. Its central locality and well- established service and economic infrastructure will create further opportunities for investment in future. Attention should be focussed on the development of service industries in the form of distribution, events tourism, education and health services, as well as administration and legal services.

(b) Jewellery hub

• Virginia

• Sasolburg represents a petro-chemical hub of the province based on its specialized industries.

(d) Logistics hub

• Harrismith

(e) Destination Resort hub

A settlement that is created in terms of the township establishment process.

• This is not a town as one would normally find – it has no significant commercial, industrial and the like amenities, but is mainly established in national and provincial interest for dwelling purposes linked to sport or some other significant element. • Mainly residential – not likely to be bigger than 500 erven. • No schools. • No large businesses. • Only a small business preferably linked to the major establishment element like sport.

Presently no destination resort hub of provincial extent or importance has been identified in the FSSDF 2007 for Fezile Dabi District.

• Royal Maluti Estate

4. TOURISM CORRIDORS

Tourism routes are scenic routes linking tourist destinations. These routes will therefore support development focusing on the hospitality

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 57 and tourism industry along it. Tourism signage to promote the tourism destinations along routes should get priority. Three tourism routes on regional scale have been identified:

• The Horizon Route linking Kimberley with Jacobsdal, Koffiefontein, Fauresmith and Jagersfontein

• The Xhariep Route linking the Xhariep Dam with Bethulie, Smithfield, Rouxville and Zastron, where it links up with the Maloti route. This route follows the proposed Southern Xhariep Tourism Zone.

• The Maloti Route linking the Eastern Cape along the R26 road, and follows the Lesotho boundary in the Eastern Free State up to Qwa-qwa. This route traverses the proposed Eastern Free State Tourism Zone.

5. TRANSPORT CORRIDORS

Transport corridors are routes of high mobility (movement) that establish a linking between areas of significance, with an optimal travel time. The potential is provided for development to locate itself in relation to these movement routes.

• The N1 road traversing the province.

• The N3 road linking Gauteng Province with Kwazulu Natal Province, passing Villiers and Harrismith.

• The N5 road linking Winburg (on the N1) with Harrismith via Bethlehem.

• It is foreseen that the N6 route will become more important in future once the Koega development has taken off. This implies the development of a transport corridor linking Bloemfontein with Aliwal North via Reddersburg, Smithfield and Rouxville. These service centres may in future change their status and become economic nodes once this route gains popularity.

• The N8 road between Bloemfontein and Lesotho border post at Ladybrand, with a development corridor proposed for the section between Bloemfontein and Thaba Nchu.

• The N8 road linking Bloemfontein with Kimberley via Petrusburg.

• The R30 road through Lejweleputswa District constitutes a major transport corridor, linking Bloemfontein with Klerksdorp in the North West Province. Welkom and Bothaville are located along this route. A well-established road network

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 58

and the north-south railway (Brandfort/ Theunissen/ Virginia/ Hennenman) occur along this corridor. This route carries large volumes of heavy vehicular traffic as a result of service delivery to the mines and associated economic activities in the area.

• The R34 road linking Welkom with Kroonstad.

• The R26/ R711/ R712/ R74 linking Ladybrand with Harrismith via Clocolan, Ficksburg, Fouriesburg and Clarens

6. DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORS

Development corridors are characterized by higher order ribbon-like development along routes that can be classified as transport (movement) corridors. These corridors promote economic activity at specific locations along these distribution routes. It thus not necessarily implies that development will be continuous for the full length of the corridor. It is foreseen that the presence of economic activity along these routes will require special attention in terms of the planning of ingress and exits to and from commercial activities in order not to interfere with the mobility of the corridor itself.

Economic development should thus be promotes along development corridors, but care should be taken not to impact negatively on the mobility of the corridor.

• The N8 road between Bloemfontein and Thaba Nchu has been identified as a development corridor, based on the proximity to labour, airports, trade with Lesotho, and its function as transport axis. (i) Development should be limited to specific localities of merit. (ii) Multi-modal transport should be encouraged and particularly rail freight should get priority. (iii) Distribution facilities may develop along the route on individual merit.

7. ZONES

Zones are areas with common identifying characteristics and usually have a homogeneous land use associated with it. It comprises medium to large sections of the spatial environment and may include land uses associated with agricultural or human settlement developments. Different kinds of zones were distinguished:

(a) Tourism zones are areas that have a high environmental quality or cultural/historic heritage and are characterized by tourist destinations. Supporting infrastructure like arts and crafts stalls,

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 59 bed and breakfasts, restaurants, etc. should be developed at strategic localities within these zones.

• Southern Gariep Tourism Zone along the southern border of the Province, adjacent to the Orange river is well suited for tourism developments and constitutes the majority of the regional dams (Van der Kloof Dam and Gariep Dam) of the Xhariep District, nature reserves, and conservancies of the area.

• Eastern Free State Tourism zone accommodates all towns earmarked as tourism nodes, Welbedaght Dam and Caledon Nature Reserve, Golden Gate National Park, Sterkfontein Dam and Nature reserve, Seekoeivlei Nature Reserve, large number of conservancies, Basotho cultural village, as well as the Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Park. It stretches from the southernmost parts (Zastron, Van Stadensrust, Ladybrand, Clocolan, Ficksburg and Fouriesburg) on the R26 route to the northeastern parts (Qwa-qwa, Kestell and Harrismith) up to and including Memel and Vrede. All these areas are linked together by means of the said tourism zone. The Rouxville-Zastron- Wepener road is in a poor condition and urgently needs upgrading in order not to negatively affects tourism.

• Vaal River Tourism Zone stretches from Villiers to the area northwest of Hoopstad and accommodates all towns earmarked as tourism nodes, Vaal Dam, Bloemhof Dam and Sandveld Nature Reserve, number of conservancies, as well as the Vredefort Dome area.

The Fezile Dabi District experienced a dramatic increase in the tourism industry regarding weekend tourist destinations.

The tourism potential of the area should be enhanced focussing on low-density residential development on the Vaal Dam and River riparian areas and “Recreation and Tourist”-attractions as identified in the Vaal River Complex Guide Plan (1982). The Vaal River Complex Guide Plan is a statutory document regulating land use along the Vaal Dam and a section of the Vaal River, which does address and manage conservation issues. Specific portions of riparian areas within the said guide plan are zoned as “Nature Areas” and “Open spaces”, which do imply measures of conservation control.

Subsequent exploitation of the tourism potential in the rural areas, including guesthouses on farms, will increase the existing employment rate.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 60

The following specific proposals regarding tourism growth in the district are made: (i) Continuous developed and effective marketing of the Stokkiesdraai, WawielPark and Renovaal recreation and holiday resorts adjacent the Vaal River in the Viljoenskroon district and the Parys urban area that are becoming popular tourist destinations. (ii) Abrahamsrust Resort located in Sasolburg and the Jim Fouché Resort located between Oranjeville and Villiers adjacent the Vaal Dam are prominent tourist related public resorts in the area that also need to be exploited for its tourism potential continuously.

The FSSDF 2007 Tourism Map classifies the above zones into Average and Above Average Tourism zones.

• Average Tourism Zone: 1. Southern Gariep Tourism zone adjacent to the Gariep River. 2. Vaal River Tourism zone stretching from Villiers to the area northwest of Hoopstad. 3. Eastern Free State Tourism zone stretching from Zastron to Ladybrand on the R26 Route.

• Above Average Tourism zones: 1. Eastern Free State Tourism zone stretching from Ladybrand up to and including Memel and Vrede

(b) Commercial agriculture zones are the larger agricultural land units that accommodate a diversity of agricultural production for the commercial market. These areas usually surround the urban nodes.

The potential of the land depends on the soil quality and the availability of water. It is recognised that all currently cultivated and grazing land be protected from urban development and that future extension should be guided by in-depth analysis that takes into account soil potential, carrying capacity, type of agriculture, availability of water, etc.

Smaller subdivision of agricultural land and change of land use will thus be considered on an individual basis and after proper analysis of the present situation and future impact of the proposed development have been done in consultation with the relevant authorities.

Subdivision of farmland will only be approved if proven sustainable.

Agro-processing plants may develop on farms, but only if proven sustainable and in line with the guidelines of the

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 61

Department of Local Government and Housing on development of peri-urban and agricultural land.

Alternative land use practices in particularly different types of products and farming methods should get attention in future.

• A commercial agricultural zone constituting a large portion of the Xhariep District accommodates a variety of mixed farming. Areas of specialisation where viable are promoted.

• Although most areas within the Thabo Mofutsanyana District have high agricultural production capacities, some areas function as agricultural concentration points due to their unique and specialized farming activities. These concentration points include: (i) Marquard for beef production. The Sparta feedlot is situated between Marquard and Senekal and exports cattle to abattoirs in various other provinces; (ii) Ficksburg for the production of asparagus, cherries and gherkins; (iii) The areas around Bethlehem and Reitz for crop production, sunflowers and maize (iv) The areas around Harrismith, Warden, Memel and Vrede for dairy, beef and mutton production. (v) Bethlehem and Reitz for flowers and fruit production.

• The areas surrounding the urban settlements of Motheo District are predominately commercial farming areas where a mixture of farming commodities is produced. The only exception is the tribal area surrounding Thaba Nchu, where communal farming practices are established. These farmland areas will remain to be the suppliers of agricultural produce in future. It is also foreseen that small and emerging farmers will be able to enter the market place with more intensive farming practices in areas earmarked as agri-villages.

• The farmers that contribute to the agricultural sector of the Fezile Dabi District currently exclusively act as crop producers and stockbreeders. Future agricultural growth can primarily be created by value-added supplementary agricultural practices. In this regard, small scale processing industries, abattoirs, etc. are considered to add value to the agricultural products before marketing.

More intensive farming activities like feeding paddocks, chicken farming, maize mills and tunnels for vegetable cultivation have the potential to provide additional employment opportunities.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 62

Small-scale farming is relatively latent and potential exists to provide in agricultural smallholdings for certain urban areas such as Sasolburg, Frankfort, Viljoenskroon and Parys.

• The agricultural sector of the Lejweleputswa District contributes largely to its GGP (statistical representation of economic attributes across a space), which emphasize the agricultural significance of this district. The latter also results in agricultural orientated industries.

(c) Irrigation zones are areas with smaller commercial agricultural units with normally a higher production yield per hectare. These units incorporate irrigation schemes and are concentrated along watercourses and dams.

• Irrigation schemes of the Riet River/ Kalkfontein Dam in the Jacobsdal/ Koffiefontein area, Van der Kloof Dam, Gariep Dam and Welbedaght Dam near Van Stadenrust in the Xhariep District have the potential to be extended.

• Irrigation schemes of the Vet and Sand River in Lejweleputswa District have the potential to be extended.

• The only formally developed irrigation scheme in Fezile Dabi District exists adjacent the Koppies urban area, and is not optimally utilised at present. It is proposed that the existing smallholdings, serviced by the irrigation scheme, be investigated to determine how it can be utilised more effectively and productively and to possibly re-establish small scale farmers on economically viable smallholdings.

• The Vaal River and Vals River pose development opportunities in the form of intensive agriculture.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 63

4.2.3 SUMMARY OF FSSDF SPATIAL INISIATIVES AND CORRESPONDING NSDP CATEGORIES AS PORTRAYED IN FSGDS

TOWN NSDP CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT COMBINED COMBINED COMBINED FSSDF SPATIAL POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT NEED DEVELOPMENT INISIATIVE POTENTIAL ( 7 INDICATORS) POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT NEED

Bloemfontein Innovation and Experimentation High Combined High Development High Rating Economic Hub (High Development Potential) Development Need Administrative Potential High value differentiated produced centre goods (fuel, rubber, plastics) (High Education Centre Development Potential) Tourism Node Labour-intensive mass produced (Events, goods (agriculture, manufacturing entertainment) apart from fuel and electronics (High Development Potential) Legislative Centre Public Services and Administration (Highest Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Highest Development Potential) Tourism (High Development Potential) Agriculture node (Top 5) Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 64

Sasolburg Innovation and Experimentation High Combined High Development High Rating Collective (agri-industry and Development Need Economic Node manufacturing) (High Potential Petro-Chemical Development Potential) Hub High value differentiated Administrative produced goods (petro- Centre chemicals, fuel, plastics, electronics (High Development Bio-fuel Node Potential) Tourism Node Labour-intensive mass produced (Events, natural goods (apart from fuels and resource, electronics) (High Development entertainment) Potential) Retail and Private Services (High Development Potential) Tourism (High Development Potential) Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 65

Welkom Innovation and Experimentation High Combined High Development High Rating Collective (mining) (High Development Development Need Economic Node Potential) Potential Administrative High value differentiated Centre produced goods (Above Education Centre Average Development Potential) Tourism Node Labour-intensive mass produced (Events, goods(mining, manufacturing entertainment, apart from fuels and electronics) mining tourism) (High Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (High Development Potential) Tourism (High Development Potential) Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node Mining Node

Virginia Innovation and Experimentation Above Average High Development Above Average Jewellery Hub (Above Average Development Combined Need Rating Retail and Private Potential) Development Services Node Potential Labour-intensive mass produced Mining Node goods (mining) (Above Average Development Potential) Tourism Node (Events, Retail and Private Services entertainment, (Above Average Development mining tourism) Potential) Tourism (Above Average Development Potential) Mining Node

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 66

Bethlehem Innovation and Experimentation Above Average Above Average Above Average Collective (Above Average Development Combined Development Need Rating Economic Node Potential) Development Tourism Node Potential Labour-intensive mass produced (Events, goods (agriculture, manufacturing entertainment) apart from fuel and electronics) (Above Average Development Potential) Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Above Average Development Potential) Tourism (Above Average Development Potential) Agriculture Node Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node

Harrismith Innovation and Experimentation Above Average Above Average Above Average Collective (agri-industry and manufacturing Combined Development Need Rating Economic Node (High Development Potential) Development Logistic Hub Potential Labour-intensive mass produced Tourism Node goods (apart from fuel and (Events, electronics (Above Average entertainment) Development Potential) Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Above Average Development Potential) Tourism (Above Average Development Potential) Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 67 Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node Kroonstad Innovation and Experimentation Above Average Above Average Above Average Collective (Above Average Development Combined Development Need Rating Economic Node Potential) Development Tourism Node Potential Labour-intensive mass produced (Events, resource) goods (apart from fuel and electronics) (Above Average Development Potential) Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Above Average Development Potential) Tourism (High Development Potential) Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node Odendaalsrus Innovation and Experimentation Below Average High Development Mining Node (Above Average Development Combined Need Retail and Private Potential) Development Services Node Potential Labour-intensive mass produced Tourism Node goods (mining) (Above Average (Events, mining Development Potential) tourism) Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Above Average Development Potential) Mining Node

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 68

Thaba Nchu Public Services and Administration Below Average High Development Retail and Private (High Development Potential) Combined Need Services Node Development Retail and Private Services (Above Tourism Node Potential Average Development Potential) (Natural resource) Tourism (Above Average Development Potential)

Botshabelo Public Services and Administration Below Average High Development Growth in excess of Specialized (Above Average Development Combined Need provincial pace Economic Node Potential) Development IDZ Node Potential Retail and Private Services (High Development Potential) in FSGDS text Manufacturing (apart from fuel and electronics)

Viljoenskroon Innovation and Experimentation Below Average Above Average Growth in excess of Specialized (Above Average Development Combined Development Need provincial pace Economic Node Potential) Development Potential Labour-intensive mass produced goods (mining, agriculture, manufacturing apart from fuels and electronics) (High Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Above Average Development Potential) Mining Node Manufacturing (apart from fuels and electronics) Node

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 69

Ficksburg Public Services and Administration Below Average Above Average Specialized (Above Average Development Combined Development Need Economic Node Potential) Development Tourism Node Potential Retail and Private Services (Above (Natural resource) Average Development Potential) Tourism (Above Average Development Potential)

Heilbron Labour-intensive mass produced Below Average Above Average Specialized goods (Above Average Combined Development Need Economic Node Development Potential) Development Potential Manufacturing Node

Ladybrand Public Services and Administration Below Average Above Average Specialized (Above Average Development Combined Development Need Economic Node Potential) Development Potential Innovation (agri-industry and manufacturing) (High Development Potential) in FSGDS text Retail and Private Services

Parys Innovation and Experimentation Below Average Above Average Tourism Node (High Development Potential) Combined Development Need (Events, natural Above Average according to Development resource, FSGDS text Potential entertainment) Public Services and Administration Services Centre (Above Average Development Potential) Tourism Development Potential, although not reflected in data (according to FSGDS text)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 70

Theunissen Labour-intensive mass produced Below Average Above Average Mining Node goods (mining) (Above Average Combined Development Need Services Centre Development Potential) Development Potential Innovation (mining) (High Development Potential) in FSGDS text Mining Node Phuthaditjhaba Public Services and Administration Below Average Below Average Administrative (Above Average Development Combined Development Need Centre Potential) Development Education Centre Potential Retail and Private Services (Above Presidential Node Average Development Potential) Tourism Node Innovation (Above Average (Natural resource) Development Potential) according to FSGDS text Manufacturing (apart from fuels Reference to manufacturing (apart and electronics) from fuels and electronics) in FSGDS Node text Retail and Private Tourism Development Potential, Services Node although not reflected in data (according to FSGDS text)

Senekal Labour-intensive mass produced Below Average Below Average Agriculture Node goods (agriculture) (Above Combined Development Need (Top 5) Average Development Potential) Development Services Centre Potential Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 71

Bothaville Labour-intensive mass produced Below Average Below Average Growth in excess of Bio-fuel Node goods (Above Average Combined Development Need provincial pace Retail and Private Development Potential) Development Services Node Potential Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential) Retail and Private Services (Above Average Development Potential)

Clarens Innovation and Experimentation Below Average Limited Development Tourism Node (High Development Potential) Combined Need (Natural resource, FSGDS text suggests for it to be Development special town ignored Potential character) Tourism (Above Average Services Centre Development Potential)

Koffiefontein Innovation and Experimentation Below Average Limited Development Services Centre (mining) (High Development Combined Need Potential) Development Potential Public Services and Administration (Above Average Development Potential)

Henneman Public Services and Administration Limited Below Average Services Centre (Above Average Development Combined Development Need Potential) Development Potential

Bultfontein Labour-intensive mass produced Limited Below Average Bio-fuel Node goods (agriculture) in FSGDS text Combined Development Need Agriculture node Development (Top 5) Potential Services Centre

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 72

Clocolan No High Development Potential or Limited Below Average Tourism Node Above Average Development Combined Development Need (Natural resource) Potential Categories identified. Development Services Centre Potential Tourism Development Potential, although not reflected in data (according to FSGDS text)

Frankfort No High Development Potential or Limited Below Average Bio-fuel Node Above Average Development Combined Development Need Services Centre Potential Categories identified. Development Potential Tourism Development Potential, although not reflected in data (according to FSGDS text)

Wesselsbron Labour-intensive mass produced Limited Below Average Manufacturing goods (Above Average Combined Development Need Node Development Potential) Development Services Centre Potential

Marquard No High Development Potential or Limited Below Average Services Centre Above Average Development Combined Development Need Potential Categories identified. Development Potential

Jagersfontein Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Economic Growth Services Centre (High Development Potential) Combined Need (102%) in excess of Development provincial pace, Potential through public service delivery

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 73

Jacobsdal No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Highest Economic Manufacturing Above Average Development Combined Need Growth (109%) in (Agri-processing) Potential Categories identified. Development excess of provincial Node Potential pace FSGDS text refers to manufacturing Services Centre linked to agri-processing

Deneysville No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Services Centre Above Average Development Combined Need Potential Categories identified. Development Potential

Fauresmith Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Services Centre (Above Average Development Combined Need Potential) Development Potential

Fouriesburg No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Retail and Private Above Average Development Combined Need Services Node Potential Categories identified. Development Tourism Node Potential Tourism Development Potential, (Natural resource) although not reflected in data (according to FSGDS text)

Hoopstad No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Agriculture Node Above Average Development Combined Need (Top 5) Potential Categories identified. Development Services Centre Potential Labour-intensive mass produced goods (agriculture) in FSGDS text

Gariepdam No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Tourism Node Above Average Development Combined Need (Resource) Potential Categories identified. Development Services Centre Potential

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 74

Memel No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Tourism Node Above Average Development Combined Need (Natural resource) Potential Categories identified. Development Services Centre Potential Tourism Development Potential, although not reflected in data (according to FSGDS text)

Petrusburg Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Services Centre (Above Average Development Combined Need Potential) Development Potential

Philippolis No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Tourism Node Above Average Development Combined Need (Heritage) Potential Categories identified. Development Services Centre Potential Heritage Centre

Reddersburg Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Services Centre (Above Average Development Combined Need Potential) Development Potential

Rosendal No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Tourism Node Above Average Development Combined Need (Natural resource, Potential Categories identified. Development special town Potential character) Services Centre

Trompsburg Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Administrative (Above Average Development Combined Need Centre Potential) Development Services Centre Potential

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 75

Tweespruit Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Services Centre (Above Average Development Combined Need Potential) Development Potential

Zastron Public Services and Administration Limited Limited Development Services Centre (Above Average Development Combined Need Potential) Development Potential

All remaining No High Development Potential or Limited Limited Development Services Centre towns Above Average Development Combined Need Potential Categories identified. Development Potential

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 76

4.2.4 REVIEWED FREE STATE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2005 - 2014): STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMMES OF SPATIAL DIMENSION

The following section is an extraction from the revised Free State Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (2005 - 2014), in order to identify specific spatial outputs:

Chapter Six of the Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (FSGDS) gave consideration to the strategic direction of the Free State. The aim of Chapter Six of the FSGDS is to formulate a strategic development framework, which will provide broad guidelines for role- players at local level and within line departments. This framework will serve as the basis from which activities and development interventions can be planned and implemented in the Free State.

The strategies and programmes with spatial dimension in respect of the development objectives set for the four Provincial priority areas, namely:

a. Economic growth, development and employment b. Social and human development c. Justice and crime prevention d. Efficient governance and administration

will be outlined below.

1. ECONOMIC GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT

The following strategies set in order to achieve the objectives for this priority area have a spatial dimension:

The key economic strategic approaches are divided into economic drives and enabling strategies.

ECONOMIC DRIVERS

1.1 Expanding the manufacturing sector in key sub-sectors The emphasis in this sector will be on supporting high-value goods such as petro-chemicals (including bio-fuels) and jewellery. Within the framework of high-value goods, extensive experimentation and innovative partnerships will be created with national and provincial research institutions potentially to grow economic activities of this nature. Further emphasis will be on supporting initiatives in respect of the manufacturing of machinery (especially for the agricultural sector), as well as in supporting initiatives in respect of leather tanning and finishing and of agri-business.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 77

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Beneficiation of agricultural products (biodiesel, cherries, asparagus, meat, maize/wheat, potatoes)

Biodiesel - Spatial focus: Lejweleputswa, Fezile Dabi, Thabo Mofutsanyana Cherries - Spatial focus: Setsoto, Dihlabeng Asparagus - Spatial focus: Dihlabeng, Setsoto, Maluti-a-Phofung Meat - No specific spatial focus Maize/ Wheat - Spatial focus: Lejweleputswa, Fezile Dabi, Thabo Mofutsanyana Potatoes - Spatial focus: Fezile Dabi, Lejweleputswa

• Beneficiation of petrochemicals Spatial focus: Metsimaholo (Sasolburg)

• Beneficiation of mining products Spatial focus: Matjhabeng (Welkom, Virginia)

• High-value products as well as innovation and experimentation Spatial focus: Those areas with high or above-average potential for high-value products: Mangaung (Bloemfontein), Matjhabeng (Welkom), Metsimaholo (Sasolburg)

• Mass produced goods Spatial focus: Those areas with high or above-average potential for mass produced goods: Mangaung (Bloemfontein), Masilonyana (Theunissen), Nala (Bothavile, Wesselsbron), Dihlabeng (Betlehem), Maluti-a-Phofung (Harrismith), Setsoto (Senekal), Matjhabeng (Welkom, Virginia, Odendaalsrus), Moqhaka (Kroonstad, Viljoenskroon), Ngwathe (Heilbron)

1.2 Focusing on diversification in agricultural development The agricultural strategy will be based on two legs: diversification of agricultural (emphasis on high value crops) activities and the beneficiation of agricultural products (agri-business as outlined under manufacturing).

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Diversify agricultural products Spatial focus: The 5 municipalities with the highest agricultural GVA per area: Nala, Dihlabeng, Setsoto, Mantsopa and Moqhaka

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 78

• Introduce high-value crops Spatial focus: The 5 municipalities with the highest agricultural GVA per area: Nala, Dihlabeng, Setsoto, Mantsopa and Moqhaka

1.3 Developing tourism The emphasis in respect of tourism will be to optimise the benefits available from this sector of the economy in the Free State. More specifically, the weekend tourism market for the north and northern- eastern Free State will be marketed explicitly. Emphasis will fall on nature tourism and heritage tourism so as to ensure that the Maluti- Drakensberg Transfrontier Park and the Vredefort Dome are prioritised and marketed in an efficient manner. Events tourism should be focused in the larger urban areas of Bloemfontein and Welkom.

Applicable programme with spatial dimension: • Develop and increase tourism products Spatial focus: Vredefort Dome, Lake Xhariep, Maluti- Drakensberg Transfrontier Park. Weekend tourism in Parys, Sasolburg and Clarens areas. Business and events tourism in Bloemfontein, Welkom.

1.4 Developing and expanding the transport and distribution industry In the context that a number of national roads are crossing the Free State, emphasis will be placed on the facilitation of transport services and logistic hubs.

Applicable programme with spatial dimension: • Develop transport distribution hubs Spatial focus: Along the N1 and N3.

ENABLING STRATEGIES

1.5 Providing adequate economic infrastructure development Settlements and municipalities identified in Chapter Four as areas of high economic potential will be prioritised for economic infrastructure. Furthermore, the emphasis will be on road infrastructure as the Free State is highly dependent on transport.

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Facilitate advanced ICT infrastructure Spatial focus: Mangaung (Bloemfontein), Matjabeng (Welkom), Metsimaholo (Sasolburg), Nqwathe (Parys), Dihlabeng (Clarens).

• Facilitate improved air transport access to the Free State Spatial focus: Emphasize cheaper air transport: Bloemfontein

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 79

• Upgrade and maintain road infrastructure Spatial focus: Areas of mass production and tourism potential: Roads in Thabo Mofutsanyana, Fezile Dabi and Lejweleputswa, and routes to Mangaung – especially the tourism areas.

• Supply bulk water and electricity infrastructure Spatial focus: Areas of potential for high-value goods: Mangaung (Bloemfontein), Matjhabeng (Welkom), Metsimaholo (Sasolburg).

1.6 Emphasising SMME development An extensive service for SMME development will be established. The focus with regard to SMME development will be on the following aspects: • Public sector procurement • Business development service focusing on making markets work • Developing networks • Basic infrastructure provision • Technology transfer

SMME support will be provided over various sectors, including support to farmers as part of the land-reform programmes.

Applicable programme with spatial dimension: • Provide formal and informal training for SMMEs Spatial focus: Emphasis on areas of high or above average need.

• Establish local business-support infrastructure Spatial focus: unspecified

1.7 Promoting human resource development for economic growth Providing the skills for a growing economy will be done by means of the following: • Learnerships • Providing skills through the FET sector • Internships

Although these programmes will be delivered over a range of economic sectors, specific emphasis will be placed on the four economic sectors identified as drivers of the Free State economy, namely Agriculture, Manufacturing, Tourism and Transport/ Distribution services.

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Formal and informal training agriculture, manufacturing and tourism Spatial focus: unspecified • Support to beneficiaries of land redistribution and restitution programmes Spatial focus: unspecified

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 80

• Non-formal training for farmers in agricultural management Spatial focus: unspecified

1.8 Creating an enabling environment In addition to the three enablers already mentioned, a broader enabling environment will be specifically created to foster economic development.

Applicable programme with spatial dimension: • Establish development zones and corridors as well as urban development nodes Spatial focus: Linked to those urban areas/ municipalities with high development potential: Mangaung, Metsimaholo, Welkom • Buy land for the establishment of PDI farmers Spatial focus: unspecified • Ensure designated funding and maintenance of government property Spatial focus: unspecified • Upgrade and maintain all government buildings Spatial focus: unspecified

2. SOCIAL AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

The following strategies set in order to achieve the objectives for this priority area have a spatial dimension:

2.1 Improving basic services and housing Overall basic services and housing will be provided to ensure a more sustainable environment, better health, and a foundation for economic activity. Although the focus will be on addressing the existing backlogs, specific attention will be given to informal settlements. In addition to the capital expenditure, systems for the provision of free basic service should also be developed.

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Provide housing Spatial focus: 4 Municipalities with highest need: Mangaung, Matjabeng, Nala, Setsoto

• Provide sanitation Spatial focus: 4 Municipalities with highest need: Mangaung, Matjabeng, Nala, Setsoto

• Eradicate bucket system Spatial focus: 4 Municipalities with highest need: Mangaung, Matjabeng, Nala, Setsoto

• Provide water Spatial focus: 4 Municipalities with highest need: Mangaung, Matjabeng, Maluti-a-Phofung, Setsoto

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 81

• Provide electricity Spatial focus: 4 Municipalities with highest need: Maluti-a- Phofung, Matjabeng, Nala, Setsoto

• Provide cemeteries Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide solid-waste disposal sites Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide storm-water drainage Spatial focus: unspecified

2.2 Improving health care services and combating disease The focus will be on improving primary health care, ensuring adequate health infrastructure and a specific focus on the availability of anti- retrovirals.

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Provide health infrastructure Spatial focus: Thabo Mofutsanyana

• Upgrade health infrastructure Spatial focus: unspecified

• Implement and monitor comprehensive plan on care, treatment, and management of HIV and AIDS Spatial focus: Highest prevalence rates: Motheo, Lejweleputswa, Thabo Mofutsanyana

• Implement HIV and AIDS prevention and support programme Spatial focus: Highest prevalence rates: Motheo, Lejweleputswa, Thabo Mofutsanyana

• Provide an integrated service to people affected and infected by HIV and AIDS Spatial focus: Highest prevalence rates: Motheo, Lejweleputswa, Thabo Mofutsanyana

• Improve access to health care for people in rural areas Spatial focus: Largest % people: Thabo Mofutsanyana

2.3 Improving education and educational services and skills The emphasis in this regard will be on improving the quality of education, access to educational facilities, ABET programmes, and ensuring the development of an adequate educational infrastructure to address the needs of a knowledge-based global economy.

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Implement adult literacy and numeracy programmes

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 82

Spatial focus: Highest need municipalities: Mangaung, Mantsopa, Moqhaka, Matjhabeng, Maluti-a-Phofung, Setsoto.

• Provide ABET in accordance with ABET Act. Spatial focus: Highest need municipalities: Mangaung, Mantsopa, Moqhaka, Matjhabeng, Maluti-a-Phofung, Setsoto.

• Implement skills development programmes Spatial focus: Highest need municipalities: Mangaung, Mantsopa, Moqhaka, Matjhabeng, Maluti-a-Phofung, Setsoto.

• Implement ECD Programmes Spatial focus: Highest need municipalities: Mangaung, Mantsopa, Moqhaka, Matjhabeng, Maluti-a-Phofung, Setsoto.

• Provide education infrastructure Spatial focus: Highest need municipalities: Fezile Dabi, Motheo, Lejweleputswa.

• Upgrade, rehabilitate, and renovate education infrastructure and facilities Spatial focus: Highest need municipalities: Fezile Dabi, Motheo, Lejweleputswa.

• Eliminate backlog in basic services in schools Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide transport for farms schools Spatial focus: Rural areas

• Provide accommodation for learners from non-viable farm schools Spatial focus: Rural areas

• Implement schools nutrition programme Spatial focus: Mangaung, Mantsopa, Moqhaka, Matjhabeng, Maluti-a-Phofung, Setsoto.

2.4 Improving social development services Although economic growth is envisaged as the main vehicle for addressing the problems of unemployment and poverty, it is also recognised that the really destitute will have to be looked after in terms of social security. Programmes in respect of social security can be divided into three sub-groups: providing social grants to those who meet the criteria; providing social services to the aged, disabled, children, youth, and women; and, providing a framework for community development and moral regeneration. Participation in sports and culture is also seen as important in ensuring healthy people and communities.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 83

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Increase to social assistance programme Spatial focus: Areas of high need

• Provide emergency food security to needy families and individuals Spatial focus: Areas of high need

• Provide pay-point facilities Spatial focus: unspecified

• Increase access to commonages Spatial focus: All municipalities

• Implement community-development projects Spatial focus: Municipalities of High need and Above-average need

• Implement training programmes to support care and protection of the vulnerable. Spatial focus: Municipalities of High need and Above-average need

• Provide early-childhood development services Spatial focus: Municipalities of High need and Above-average need

• Implement programmes targeting the unemployed and out-of- school youth Spatial focus: Municipalities of High need and Above-average need

• Promote social integration and empowerment of people with disabilities Spatial focus: Municipalities of High need and Above-average need

• Implement moral regeneration programmes for the community Spatial focus: unspecified

• Implement income-generating projects for youth, women and persons with disabilities Spatial focus: Municipalities of High need and Above-average need

2.5 Improving cultural, sport and recreational services Improving cultural, sport and recreational activities is set as a strategic directive in order to create an environment for healthier and better- educated individuals.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 84

Applicable programme with spatial dimension: • Provide arts and culture centres Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide other government accommodation/ buildings Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide library infrastructure Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide sport facilities Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide multi-purpose centres Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide library and information services Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide special services Spatial focus: unspecified

• Promote major cultural events Spatial focus: unspecified

• Provide museum and heritage services Spatial focus: unspecified

• Render sport science, exercise rehabilitation, and sport development services Spatial focus: unspecified

3. JUSTICE AND CRIME PREVENTION

The following strategies set in order to achieve the objectives for this priority area have a spatial dimension:

3.1 Facilitate an improved and effective integrated criminal justice system

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Victim empowerment Spatial focus: Mangaung, Matjabeng

• Service programmes for children in conflict with the law Spatial focus: Mangaung, Matjabeng

• Develop and implement integrated crime-prevention programmes Spatial focus: see Crime Prevention Programme (FSGDS)

3.2 Ensure effective and efficient police service in the province

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 85

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Effective visible police service Spatial focus: Main tourism areas, as well as Mangaung, Matjhabeng

• Encourage community participation Spatial focus: Main tourism areas, as well as Mangaung, Matjhabeng

• Promote accessibility to police services Spatial focus: Main tourism areas, as well as Mangaung, Matjhabeng

• Enhance service delivery and transformation Spatial focus: Thabo Mofatsanyana tourism areas

• Maintain rural safety Spatial focus: Lesotho border area

3.3 Establish an effective disaster prevention and response capacity for disasters throughout the Province

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Coordinate integrated disaster management services Spatial focus: Districts with the highest potential for disasters: Fezile Dabi, Thabo Mofatsanyana, Lejweleputswa

• Minimise the impact of disasters Spatial focus: Thabo Mofutsanyana – veld fires, N3 and N1 road accidents, Sasolburg – chemical disasters

3.4 Improve traffic policing and road incident management in the Province

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Provide effective emergency communication Spatial focus: N1/N3/N8/N6/N5, Metsimaholo

• Implement road-traffic regulations Spatial focus: N1/N3/N8/N6/N5, Metsimaholo

• Implement effective emergency services Spatial focus: N1/N3/N8/N6/N5, Metsimaholo

3.5 Implement a Provincial EMS Plan

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Provide medical rescue, pre- and inter hospital EMSs Spatial focus: unspecified

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 86

3.6 Ensure a safe and secure environment at all institutions

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Implement safety programmes at all institutions Spatial focus: Fezile Dabi, Lejweleputswa, Xhariep

• Provide effective emergency communication Spatial focus: unspecified

4. EFFICIENT GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

The following strategies set in order to achieve the objectives for this priority area have a spatial dimension:

4.1 Improve IDPs and IDP implementation. Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Implement Community Based Ward Planning through Ward Committees Spatial focus: unspecified

4.2 Ensure effective communication with stakeholders and clients. Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Implement one-stop government services Spatial focus: unspecified

4.3 Strategic Approach E3: Promote BEE has no spatial dimension.

4.4 Strategic Approach E4: Ensure effective Human Resource Development and Management has no spatial dimension.

4.5 Ensure improvement in financial management. Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Improve and coordinate revenue measures and mechanism Spatial focus: Municipalities under Project Consolidate

• Strengthen financial management capacity in departments Spatial focus: Municipalities under Project Consolidate

• Implement credit control systems Spatial focus: Municipalities under Project Consolidate

4.6 Strategic Approach E6: Promote integrity in government has no spatial dimension.

4.7 Strategic Approach E7: Establish proper management information and record management systems has no spatial dimension.

4.8 Strategic Approach E8: Improving asset management has no spatial dimension.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 87

4.9 Build government’s capacity in critical areas.

Applicable programmes with spatial dimension: • Improve financial management capacity Spatial focus: Municipalities under Project Consolidate

• Provide capacity-building programme for all staff Spatial focus: Municipalities under Project Consolidate

4.10 Ensure a healthy environment through integrated environmental management.

Applicable programme with spatial dimension: • Implement integrated environmental management Spatial focus: Metsimaholo, Eastern Free State (Mountains)

4.11 Strategic Approach E11: Monitor, evaluate and review the FSGDS has no spatial dimension.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 88

5. T A B L E S

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 89

Table: Percentage of unemployed people per local municipality.

Number of Local municipality people Rate FS161: Letsemeng 5850 35.70 FS162: Kopanong 17206 33.80 FS163: Mohokare 5244 32.60 FS171: Naledi 3315 35.90 FS172: Mangaung 107305 37.80 FS173: Mantsopa 9553 38.60 FS181: Masilonyana 12254 37.60 FS182: Tokologo 3769 31.30 FS183: Tswelopele 6971 31.90 FS184: Matjhabeng 121247 39.50 FS185: Nala 12328 41.10 FS191: Setsoto 13486 29.30 FS192: Dihlabeng 12595 29.50 FS193: Nketoana 9954 31.70 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 80664 61.70 FS195: Phumelela 9242 38.70 FS201: Moqhaka 26288 32.20 FS203: Ngwathe 24034 43.50 FS204: Metsimaholo 18508 33.40 FS205: Mafube 7063 33.80 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 90

Table: Percentage of people living in poverty per local municipality.

Number of Local municipality people Rate FS161: Letsemeng 21862 55.50 FS162: Kopanong 45933 40.20 FS163: Mohokare 30795 67.90 FS171: Naledi 18308 74.80 FS172: Mangaung 263267 41.00 FS173: Mantsopa 44382 73.80 FS181: Masilonyana 46401 68.60 FS182: Tokologo 23095 79.60 FS183: Tswelopele 45762 79.60 FS184: Matjhabeng 269598 48.10 FS185: Nala 63307 74.90 FS191: Setsoto 83366 75.20 FS192: Dihlabeng 60475 58.90 FS193: Nketoana 60454 74.00 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 258266 65.70 FS195: Phumelela 47563 78.20 FS201: Moqhaka 110650 60.10 FS203: Ngwathe 92822 65.60 FS204: Metsimaholo 39710 31.60 FS205: Mafube 46101 77.00 Source: FSGDS Review, 2006 (Global Insight, 2006)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 91

Table: Percentage of population no schooling and total population per local municipality.

Population Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 19.88 8544 42979 FS162: Kopanong 16.09 9001 55943 FS163: Mohokare 16.62 6037 36316 FS171: Naledi 11.82 3249 27486 FS172: Mangaung 9.90 63906 645438 FS173: Mantsopa 12.78 7070 55339 FS181: Masilonyana 14.82 9547 64413 FS182: Tokologo 22.83 7410 32456 FS183: Tswelopele 18.40 9881 53707 FS184: Matjhabeng 11.31 46157 408167 FS185: Nala 13.67 13434 98261 FS191: Setsoto 14.83 18267 123196 FS192: Dihlabeng 14.24 18356 128933 FS193: Nketoana 20.32 12586 61950 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 15.50 55911 360790 FS195: Phumelela 17.33 8823 50909 FS201: Moqhaka 9.71 16300 167894 FS203: Ngwathe 14.16 16822 118810 FS204: Metsimaholo 9.85 11425 115985 FS205: Mafube 17.86 10297 57639 Total 13.04 353039 2706783 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 92

Table: Percentage of population with limited education (up to grade 5) and total population per local municipality.

Population Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 26.10 11219 42979 FS162: Kopanong 26.86 15026 55943 FS163: Mohokare 31.10 11293 36316 FS171: Naledi 32.09 8820 27486 FS172: Mangaung 22.03 142217 645438 FS173: Mantsopa 26.51 14673 55339 FS181: Masilonyana 26.08 16801 64413 FS182: Tokologo 26.92 8737 32456 FS183: Tswelopele 27.86 14964 53707 FS184: Matjhabeng 21.59 88108 408167 FS185: Nala 26.77 26302 98261 FS191: Setsoto 25.42 31311 123196 FS192: Dihlabeng 24.32 31354 128933 FS193: Nketoana 26.45 16387 61950 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 25.02 90252 360790 FS195: Phumelela 28.03 14271 50909 FS201: Moqhaka 23.38 39256 167894 FS203: Ngwathe 24.62 29256 118810 FS204: Metsimaholo 21.05 24413 115985 FS205: Mafube 25.99 14982 57639 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 93

Table: Access to Formal Dwelling

Town/cluster/semi- detached house House or brick structure on a Traditional dwelling/hut/structure (simplex; duplex, House/flat/room Local municipality separate stand or yard made of traditional materials Flat in block of flats triplex) in back yard Total FS161: Letsemeng 8834 295 15 62 87 9293 FS162: Kopanong 14723 710 54 101 72 15660 FS163: Mohokare 7054 380 81 52 81 7648 FS171: Naledi 5494 319 61 45 54 5973 FS172: Mangaung 113692 8130 6116 5202 6218 139358 FS173: Mantsopa 8606 1644 39 121 468 10878 FS181: Masilonyana 10290 709 51 99 870 12019 FS182: Tokologo 6750 368 25 69 39 7251 FS183: Tswelopele 8589 616 57 51 110 9423 FS184: Matjhabeng 57649 2615 2405 1901 5556 70126 FS185: Nala 15058 767 110 54 160 16149 FS191: Setsoto 14376 3978 183 130 594 19261 FS192: Dihlabeng 18949 3973 516 395 755 24588 FS193: Nketoana 8274 2331 69 66 180 10920 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 54753 19280 885 662 1941 77521 FS195: Phumelela 6544 2641 50 27 219 9481 FS201: Moqhaka 31587 1153 606 372 1397 35115 FS203: Ngwathe 20859 969 263 655 679 23425 FS204: Metsimaholo 17583 481 1128 670 877 20739 FS205: Mafube 9088 1216 59 55 307 10725 Total 438806 52577 12774 10791 20666 535614 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 94

Table: Percentage of households with traditional dwelling per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 2.44 295 12088 FS162: Kopanong 4.03 710 17606 FS163: Mohokare 3.98 380 9545 FS171: Naledi 4.16 319 7675 FS172: Mangaung 4.31 8130 188647 FS173: Mantsopa 11.68 1644 14075 FS181: Masilonyana 3.46 709 20490 FS182: Tokologo 4.10 368 8972 FS183: Tswelopele 4.91 616 12544 FS184: Matjhabeng 2.03 2615 128647 FS185: Nala 2.95 767 26000 FS191: Setsoto 11.85 3978 33569 FS192: Dihlabeng 11.90 3973 33395 FS193: Nketoana 15.51 2331 15029 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 20.93 19280 92100 FS195: Phumelela 21.96 2641 12029 FS201: Moqhaka 2.63 1153 43833 FS203: Ngwathe 2.98 969 32505 FS204: Metsimaholo 1.43 481 33699 FS205: Mafube 8.23 1216 14782 Total 6.94 52577 757291 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 95

Table: Percentage of households that access no formal dwelling per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 24.32 2940 12088 FS162: Kopanong 13.46 2370 17606 FS163: Mohokare 21.23 2026 9545 FS171: Naledi 24.48 1879 7675 FS172: Mangaung 27.40 51680 188647 FS173: Mantsopa 31.13 4382 14075 FS181: Masilonyana 26.52 5433 20490 FS182: Tokologo 21.42 1922 8972 FS183: Tswelopele 27.80 3487 12544 FS184: Matjhabeng 39.85 51270 128647 FS185: Nala 39.90 10375 26000 FS191: Setsoto 51.24 17202 33569 FS192: Dihlabeng 35.77 11946 33395 FS193: Nketoana 41.45 6230 15029 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 33.78 31110 92100 FS195: Phumelela 41.68 5014 12029 FS201: Moqhaka 16.45 7209 43833 FS203: Ngwathe 28.73 9340 32505 FS204: Metsimaholo 34.33 11570 33699 FS205: Mafube 33.50 4952 14782 Total 32.00 242338 757291 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 96

Table: Percentage of households with traditional and informal dwellings per local municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 97

Table: Access to Water

Piped water on Piped water on community community stand: Piped stand: distance water Piped distance less greater than Rain- Dam/pool/ inside water than 200m. 200m. from water stagnant Water Local municipality dwelling inside yard from dwelling dwelling Borehole Spring tank water River/stream vendor Other Total FS161: Letsemeng 3830 5385 1361 897 109 - 30 48 46 12 366 12084 FS162: Kopanong 4332 10572 1178 1091 215 3 15 20 6 6 173 17611 FS163: Mohokare 1576 6016 964 789 58 21 24 41 9 6 36 9540 FS171: Naledi 1053 4754 848 800 101 - 6 19 12 3 76 7672 FS172: Mangaung 49069 81856 26570 23224 436 54 66 96 42 342 6902 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 2718 7652 1937 1183 142 12 60 96 54 12 204 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 3967 12351 1849 1807 131 3 27 15 - 15 326 20491 FS182: Tokologo 1666 5399 832 650 188 - 12 64 9 12 133 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 1702 5472 3270 1760 94 3 9 55 9 3 156 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 33417 58644 12686 17885 892 18 102 318 27 529 4122 128640 FS185: Nala 5028 14323 3455 2191 352 6 26 6 12 15 572 25985 FS191: Setsoto 4550 11970 9665 5806 243 185 77 95 45 37 889 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 8459 16284 3796 2883 465 254 114 205 96 35 810 33402 FS193: Nketoana 2133 9607 1570 1305 74 24 54 64 24 21 145 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 15555 36561 19823 13622 308 446 287 395 126 141 4837 92102 FS195: Phumelela 1711 7099 841 1358 367 126 119 130 106 9 159 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 12387 24479 3668 2485 204 - 61 50 12 39 450 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 7712 20179 2142 1766 243 3 54 57 15 6 331 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 14607 12959 3226 2491 66 3 9 3 15 18 304 33701 FS205: Mafube 2410 10379 875 718 149 24 27 92 18 30 60 14783 Total 177925 361958 100556 84710 4838 1186 1181 1868 683 1290 21050 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 98

Table: Percentage of households with no piped water per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 5.06 611 12084 FS162: Kopanong 2.49 438 17611 FS163: Mohokare 2.04 195 9540 FS171: Naledi 2.83 217 7672 FS172: Mangaung 4.21 7938 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 4.12 580 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 2.52 517 20491 FS182: Tokologo 4.66 418 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 2.63 329 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 4.67 6008 128640 FS185: Nala 3.81 989 25985 FS191: Setsoto 4.68 1571 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 5.92 1979 33402 FS193: Nketoana 2.70 406 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 7.10 6540 92102 FS195: Phumelela 8.45 1016 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 1.86 816 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 2.18 709 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 1.24 418 33701 FS205: Mafube 2.71 400 14783 Total 4.24 32096 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Table: Percentage of households with piped community stands greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 99

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 7.42 897 12084 FS162: Kopanong 6.19 1091 17611 FS163: Mohokare 8.27 789 9540 FS171: Naledi 10.43 800 7672 FS172: Mangaung 12.31 23224 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 8.41 1183 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 8.82 1807 20491 FS182: Tokologo 7.25 650 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 14.04 1760 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 13.90 17885 128640 FS185: Nala 8.43 2191 25985 FS191: Setsoto 17.30 5806 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 8.63 2883 33402 FS193: Nketoana 8.69 1305 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 14.79 13622 92102 FS195: Phumelela 11.29 1358 12027

FS201: Moqhaka 5.67 2485 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 5.43 1766 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 7.39 2491 33701 FS205: Mafube 4.86 718 14783 Total 11.19 84710 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 100

Table: Percentage of households with no piped water and piped water stands greater than 200m from the yard per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 12.48 1508 12084 FS162: Kopanong 8.68 1529 17611 FS163: Mohokare 10.31 984 9540 FS171: Naledi 13.26 1017 7672 FS172: Mangaung 16.52 31162 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 12.53 1763 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 11.34 2324 20491 FS182: Tokologo 11.91 1068 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 16.67 2089 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 18.57 23893 128640 FS185: Nala 12.24 3180 25985 FS191: Setsoto 21.98 7377 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 14.56 4862 33402 FS193: Nketoana 11.39 1711 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 21.89 20162 92102 FS195: Phumelela 19.74 2374 12027

FS201: Moqhaka 7.53 3301 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 7.61 2475 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 8.63 2909 33701 FS205: Mafube 7.56 1118 14783 Total 15.43 116806 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 101

Table: Sanitation

Flush toilet (connected to Flush toilet (with Chemical Pit latrine with Pit latrine without Bucket Local municipality sewerage system) septic tank) toilet ventilation (VIP) ventilation latrine None Total FS161: Letsemeng 7367 202 27 456 923 708 2401 12084 FS162: Kopanong 12611 199 63 582 938 1104 2114 17611 FS163: Mohokare 5185 333 33 513 696 1091 1689 9540 FS171: Naledi 4210 136 3 288 662 1308 1065 7672 FS172: Mangaung 90431 3715 2365 23186 20975 30377 17607 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 4344 468 77 511 1656 5158 1856 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 6887 323 54 261 1390 9586 1989 20491 FS182: Tokologo 1252 405 23 200 1000 4106 1979 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 1614 404 18 189 2240 6515 1551 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 80395 984 575 1124 13034 20747 11781 128640 FS185: Nala 6109 537 15 475 3460 13933 1456 25985 FS191: Setsoto 7498 506 104 665 3040 16960 4790 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 18421 732 108 380 3047 5155 5559 33402 FS193: Nketoana 1702 289 145 346 2310 8153 2076 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 19930 1223 2108 12655 50978 1997 3211 92102 FS195: Phumelela 3600 242 155 347 2206 3164 2313 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 28633 439 122 1609 4564 6936 1532 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 16642 421 276 1276 4103 7482 2307 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 23247 630 45 488 4315 1559 3417 33701 FS205: Mafube 8778 204 39 326 497 3872 1067 14783 Total 348916 12389 6356 45878 122034 149911 71761 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 102

Table: Percentage of households with no sewerage per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 19.87 2401 12084 FS162: Kopanong 12.00 2114 17611 FS163: Mohokare 17.70 1689 9540 FS171: Naledi 13.88 1065 7672 FS172: Mangaung 9.33 17607 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 13.19 1856 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 9.71 1989 20491 FS182: Tokologo 22.08 1979 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 12.38 1551 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 9.16 11781 128640 FS185: Nala 5.60 1456 25985 FS191: Setsoto 14.27 4790 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 16.64 5559 33402 FS193: Nketoana 13.82 2076 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 3.49 3211 92102 FS195: Phumelela 19.23 2313 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 3.50 1532 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 7.10 2307 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 10.14 3417 33701 FS205: Mafube 7.22 1067 14783 Total 9.48 71761 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 103

Table: Percentage of households that use pit/bucket latrines (with or without ventilation) per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 17.27 2087 12084 FS162: Kopanong 14.90 2624 17611 FS163: Mohokare 24.11 2300 9540 FS171: Naledi 29.43 2258 7672 FS172: Mangaung 39.51 74538 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 52.06 7325 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 54.84 11237 20491 FS182: Tokologo 59.19 5306 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 71.37 8944 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 27.13 34905 128640 FS185: Nala 68.76 17868 25985 FS191: Setsoto 61.57 20665 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 25.69 8582 33402 FS193: Nketoana 71.96 10809 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 71.26 65630 92102 FS195: Phumelela 47.53 5717 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 29.91 13109 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 39.56 12861 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 18.88 6362 33701 FS205: Mafube 31.76 4695 14783 Total 41.97 317823 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Table: Percentage of households with pit and bucket latrines and without sanitation per local municipality.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 104

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 37.14 4488 12084 FS162: Kopanong 26.90 4738 17611 FS163: Mohokare 41.81 3989 9540 FS171: Naledi 43.31 3323 7672 FS172: Mangaung 48.84 92145 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 65.25 9181 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 64.55 13226 20491 FS182: Tokologo 81.27 7285 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 83.75 10495 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 36.29 46686 128640 FS185: Nala 74.37 19324 25985 FS191: Setsoto 75.84 25455 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 42.34 14141 33402 FS193: Nketoana 85.78 12885 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 74.74 68841 92102 FS195: Phumelela 66.77 8030 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 33.40 14641 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 46.66 15168 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 29.02 9779 33701 FS205: Mafube 38.98 5762 14783 Total 51.45 389584 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 105

Table: Access to Electricity

Local municipality Electricity Gas Paraffin Candles Solar Other Total FS161: Letsemeng 8718 12 860 2448 21 24 12084 FS162: Kopanong 14369 33 774 2317 79 40 17611 FS163: Mohokare 6941 21 666 1814 70 29 9540 FS171: Naledi 6001 - 379 1258 15 18 7672 FS172: Mangaung 160331 559 9828 17458 218 262 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 10524 36 270 3129 60 51 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 15654 36 1223 3515 30 33 20491 FS182: Tokologo 6543 18 334 1987 54 27 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 8405 15 351 3662 51 49 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 90142 246 13025 24829 258 140 128640 FS185: Nala 20654 15 397 4814 42 63 25985 FS191: Setsoto 24066 42 1131 8063 174 87 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 22400 59 945 9721 194 83 33402 FS193: Nketoana 11472 18 216 3158 90 67 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 52710 156 2510 36255 249 220 92102 FS195: Phumelela 7795 9 60 4055 42 65 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 36720 48 882 5941 156 88 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 27269 24 267 4708 113 127 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 26211 69 442 6892 33 54 33701 FS205: Mafube 10621 12 123 3885 109 33 14783 Total 567604 1429 34683 149909 2059 1560 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 106

Table: Percentage of households without electricity and total households per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 27.85 3365 12084 FS162: Kopanong 18.41 3243 17611 FS163: Mohokare 27.25 2600 9540 FS171: Naledi 21.77 1670 7672 FS172: Mangaung 15.01 28325 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 25.20 3546 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 23.61 4837 20491 FS182: Tokologo 27.00 2420 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 32.94 4128 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 29.93 38498 128640 FS185: Nala 20.52 5331 25985 FS191: Setsoto 28.30 9497 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 32.94 11002 33402 FS193: Nketoana 23.63 3549 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 42.77 39390 92102 FS195: Phumelela 35.18 4231 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 16.23 7115 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 16.12 5239 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 22.22 7490 33701 FS205: Mafube 28.15 4162 14783 Total 25.04 189640 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 107

Table: Access to Refuse Removal

Removed by local authority Removed by local authority Communal refuse Own refuse No rubbish Local municipality at least once a week at less often dump dump disposal Total FS161: Letsemeng 7499 66 67 4191 260 12084 FS162: Kopanong 12262 731 66 3707 845 17611 FS163: Mohokare 5822 201 377 2753 387 9540 FS171: Naledi 4331 404 138 2077 721 7672 FS172: Mangaung 113277 4033 6648 43641 21057 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 8653 832 254 2848 1483 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 8839 2476 1066 6346 1764 20491 FS182: Tokologo 4135 338 359 3516 616 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 3696 322 3249 4003 1263 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 98854 1614 4526 16950 6697 128640 FS185: Nala 19253 123 168 4175 2266 25985 FS191: Setsoto 17316 3947 667 7869 3763 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 20979 645 583 7315 3881 33402 FS193: Nketoana 9604 228 363 3363 1464 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 21246 671 3758 51469 14958 92102 FS195: Phumelela 7299 193 27 3201 1307 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 29456 3883 270 8889 1337 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 18902 1130 719 8023 3733 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 20588 844 3076 7425 1768 33701 FS205: Mafube 10413 1753 159 1738 719 14783 Total 442446 24438 26539 193532 70290 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 108

Table: Percentage of households that access no refuse removal and total population per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 37.39 4518 12084 FS162: Kopanong 26.22 4618 17611 FS163: Mohokare 36.87 3517 9540 FS171: Naledi 38.27 2936 7672 FS172: Mangaung 37.82 71346 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 32.59 4585 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 44.78 9176 20491 FS182: Tokologo 50.10 4491 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 67.95 8515 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 21.90 28173 128640 FS185: Nala 25.43 6609 25985 FS191: Setsoto 36.65 12299 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 35.26 11779 33402 FS193: Nketoana 34.55 5190 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 76.20 70185 92102 FS195: Phumelela 37.71 4535 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 23.94 10496 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 38.38 12475 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 36.41 12269 33701 FS205: Mafube 17.70 2616 14783 Total 38.34 290361 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 109

Table: Access to Landline (Telephone)

No Telephone in At a At a public At another At another access to Not dwelling Telephone in Cell-phone neighbour telephone location location; not a applicable Local municipality and cell-phone dwelling only only nearby nearby nearby nearby telephone (institutions) Total FS161: Letsemeng 1106 1327 990 1905 4378 876 337 1164 - 12084 FS162: Kopanong 1543 2689 1382 2900 5818 492 346 2441 - 17611 FS163: Mohokare 737 974 731 1659 2965 720 468 1286 - 9540 FS171: Naledi 486 746 703 972 2944 541 523 758 - 7672 FS172: Mangaung 25107 21681 34056 9118 81357 7395 3345 6598 - 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 1307 1734 1286 1327 5644 618 748 1406 - 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 1105 1917 2441 1618 9011 1484 694 2222 - 20491 FS182: Tokologo 688 863 751 1733 2484 336 263 1846 - 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 641 871 1305 1265 4691 1206 653 1900 - 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 12903 11534 21182 5524 67428 2593 2170 5306 - 128640 FS185: Nala 1327 1734 2824 1243 11787 1294 648 5128 - 25985 FS191: Setsoto 2133 3099 3322 2313 14360 1705 2112 4519 - 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 3726 3988 4510 2735 12156 1358 830 4099 - 33402 FS193: Nketoana 1034 1673 1756 1274 6297 1187 853 949 - 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 5495 7440 15372 6100 44528 3857 2985 6325 - 92102 FS195: Phumelela 958 1673 1292 1467 3181 982 476 1997 - 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 4903 5876 6293 3107 18803 884 830 3138 - 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 3177 4873 3886 2161 12945 1441 1233 2794 - 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 4803 2977 7308 998 15745 906 363 601 - 33701 FS205: Mafube 863 1228 2427 1019 6173 727 390 1955 - 14783 Total 74058 78903 113830 50441 332717 30600 20265 56432 - 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 110

Table: Percentage of households that access no landlines removal and total households per local municipality.

Households Local municipality Percentage number Total FS161: Letsemeng 12.42 1501 12084 FS162: Kopanong 15.83 2787 17611 FS163: Mohokare 18.39 1754 9540 FS171: Naledi 16.70 1281 7672 FS172: Mangaung 5.27 9943 188656 FS173: Mantsopa 15.31 2154 14070 FS181: Masilonyana 14.23 2916 20491 FS182: Tokologo 23.53 2109 8964 FS183: Tswelopele 20.37 2553 12532 FS184: Matjhabeng 5.81 7476 128640 FS185: Nala 22.23 5776 25985 FS191: Setsoto 19.76 6631 33562 FS192: Dihlabeng 14.76 4929 33402 FS193: Nketoana 12.00 1802 15021 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 10.11 9310 92102 FS195: Phumelela 20.56 2473 12027 FS201: Moqhaka 9.05 3968 43834 FS203: Ngwathe 12.39 4027 32508 FS204: Metsimaholo 2.86 964 33701 FS205: Mafube 15.86 2345 14783 Total 10.13 76697 757245 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 111

Table: Percentage of population that is economically inactive per local municipality

Local municipality Percentage Population number Total FS161: Letsemeng 39.31 45592 115980 FS162: Kopanong 39.71 162092 408171 FS163: Mohokare 41.44 267469 645438 FS171: Naledi 41.84 70242 167898 FS172: Mangaung 43.27 27868 64411 FS173: Mantsopa 44.82 57780 128928 FS181: Masilonyana 45.83 14871 32451 FS182: Tokologo 46.44 25984 55946 FS183: Tswelopele 46.50 55244 118809 FS184: Matjhabeng 46.50 45690 98260 FS185: Nala 46.52 19992 42975 FS191: Setsoto 46.56 16911 36319 FS192: Dihlabeng 46.72 25858 55349 FS193: Nketoana 47.44 58444 123196 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 49.36 26513 53713 FS195: Phumelela 49.36 13560 27471 FS201: Moqhaka 49.44 30627 61954 FS203: Ngwathe 49.50 25196 50905 FS204: Metsimaholo 49.85 179852 360786 FS205: Mafube 50.34 29014 57637 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 112

Table: Percentage of population from 0 – 6 years and total population per local municipality.

Local Municipality Percentage 0-6 yrs Total FS161: Letsemeng 15.70 6746 42975 FS162: Kopanong 13.39 7490 55946 FS163: Mohokare 13.31 4833 36319 FS171: Naledi 13.22 3633 27471 FS172: Mangaung 12.44 80311 645438 FS173: Mantsopa 14.16 7840 55349 FS181: Masilonyana 13.29 8560 64411 FS182: Tokologo 15.11 4904 32451 FS183: Tswelopele 16.47 8847 53713 FS184: Matjhabeng 12.67 51728 408171 FS185: Nala 14.23 13978 98260 FS191: Setsoto 13.88 17103 123196 FS192: Dihlabeng 13.73 17706 128928 FS193: Nketoana 14.21 8806 61954 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 14.32 51663 360786 FS195: Phumelela 15.44 7860 50905 FS201: Moqhaka 12.25 20567 167898 FS203: Ngwathe 13.26 15754 118809 FS204: Metsimaholo 12.22 14168 115980 FS205: Mafube 14.59 8410 57637 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 113

Table: Percentage of population from 7 – 18 years and total population per local municipality.

Local municipality Percentage 7- 8 yrs Total FS161: Letsemeng 26.57 11419 42975 FS162: Kopanong 26.81 14998 55946 FS163: Mohokare 27.97 10157 36319 FS171: Naledi 29.99 8239 27471 FS172: Mangaung 24.33 157037 645438 FS173: Mantsopa 27.38 15154 55349 FS181: Masilonyana 25.02 16114 64411 FS182: Tokologo 25.79 8368 32451 FS183: Tswelopele 28.68 15406 53713 FS184: Matjhabeng 23.77 97037 408171 FS185: Nala 28.31 27813 98260 FS191: Setsoto 28.79 35470 123196 FS192: Dihlabeng 26.42 34063 128928 FS193: Nketoana 30.22 18723 61954 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 30.98 111768 360786 FS195: Phumelela 28.87 14698 50905 FS201: Moqhaka 24.37 40920 167898 FS203: Ngwathe 26.63 31641 118809 FS204: Metsimaholo 23.75 27546 115980 FS205: Mafube 30.46 17555 57637 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 114

Table: Percentage of population from 19 - 65 years and total population per local municipality.

Local municipality Percentage 19-65 yrs Total FS161: Letsemeng 53.48 22983 42975 FS162: Kopanong 53.56 29962 55946 FS163: Mohokare 53.44 19408 36319 FS171: Naledi 50.64 13911 27471 FS172: Mangaung 58.56 377969 645438 FS173: Mantsopa 53.28 29491 55349 FS181: Masilonyana 56.73 36543 64411 FS182: Tokologo 54.17 17580 32451 FS183: Tswelopele 50.64 27200 53713 FS184: Matjhabeng 60.29 246079 408171 FS185: Nala 53.50 52570 98260 FS191: Setsoto 52.56 64752 123196 FS192: Dihlabeng 55.18 71148 128928 FS193: Nketoana 50.56 31327 61954 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 50.15 180934 360786 FS195: Phumelela 50.50 25709 50905 FS201: Moqhaka 58.16 97656 167898 FS203: Ngwathe 53.50 63565 118809 FS204: Metsimaholo 60.69 70388 115980 FS205: Mafube 49.66 28623 57637 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 115

Table: Percentage of population over 65 yrs ( elderly) and total population per local municipality.

Local municipality Percentage Elderly Total FS161: Letsemeng 4.25 1827 42975 FS162: Kopanong 6.25 3496 55946 FS163: Mohokare 5.29 1921 36319 FS171: Naledi 6.14 1688 27471 FS172: Mangaung 4.67 30121 645438 FS173: Mantsopa 5.17 2864 55349 FS181: Masilonyana 4.96 3194 64411 FS182: Tokologo 4.93 1599 32451 FS183: Tswelopele 4.21 2260 53713 FS184: Matjhabeng 3.27 13327 408171 FS185: Nala 3.97 3899 98260 FS191: Setsoto 4.77 5871 123196 FS192: Dihlabeng 4.66 6011 128928 FS193: Nketoana 5.00 3098 61954 FS194: Maluti a Phofung 4.55 16421 360786 FS195: Phumelela 5.18 2638 50905 FS201: Moqhaka 5.21 8755 167898 FS203: Ngwathe 6.61 7849 118809 FS204: Metsimaholo 3.34 3878 115980 FS205: Mafube 5.29 3049 57637 Source: Statistics South Africa – Census 2001

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 116

PRGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: LAND REDISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (LRAD) PROJECTS District Municipality Town Nearest Local Municipality Name Project Description Project LandState TypeProduct Enterprise Production Type1 Production Type2 /Rural Urban Status of Project Buckland Family Remaining extent of the farm Private Single Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Project Hangklip No. 262 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock None Rural Transferred Private Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Nongabe Jeremsyfontn no.590 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Reddersbur Phetlho Family Private Xhariep g Kopanong Project The farm Rondebult No. 163. Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Single Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Thola Trust The farm Sedgemoor No. 496 Land Agri Type Livestock Rural Transferred Remaining extent of the farm Tweepan No. 119; Portion Private Single Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Lema O Phele known as Genoviva No. 209 Land Agri Type Livestock Rural Transferred Remainder of the farm Private Single Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Tswelopele Ospoort No. 44 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Subdivision 22 of 1 of the farm Private Xhariep Jagerfontein Kopanong Zakheleni Telegraafontein 644 Land Transferred Private Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Ncaseka The farm Papenfus No. 72 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Single Xhariep Wepener Mohokare Haramokhutswane Bethel No.6 Land Agri Type Agri Crops Rural Transferred

Remainder of portion 1 of the farm Kareekraal No. 295 & Portion 2 of the farm Private Single Xhariep Fauresmith Letsemeng Medupe Project Kareekraal No. 295 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 117

Remainder of the farm Myn- hoop No. 62; Remainder of the farm Middelfontein No. 71 & Certain remaining portion of Private Single Xhariep Trompsburg Kopanong Olifant Trust the farm Vlakfontein No. 119 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Xhariep Bethulie Kopanong Siyakhula Gerlachsthal no.458 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Private Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Theane Portion 1 of Erf No.276 Land Agri Mixed Crops Vege Rural Transferred

Remainder of the farm Greylingsfontein No. 843 & The farm Collins Private Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Dashe Put No. 274 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred The farm Rustfontein No. 637 & The remaining extent of the Private Single Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Machabela/Nqisha farm North Pole No. 203 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Portion 7 & 8 of the farm Mara Private Xhariep Edenburg Kopanong Matobako No. Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Doortocht No.974 & Private Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Siyabonga Smartenswill No.821 Land Transferred Remainder of the farm Waterloo 366 & Private Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Ngxito Oranje 16 Land Agri Transferred Portion 1of the farm Conway Private Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Khuze No. 1088 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry/Crops Rural Transferred Private Single Xhariep Bethulie Mohokare Kwa'Jola The farm Clifton No. 464 Land Agri Type Agri Broiler Urban Transferred Remainder of the Farm Private Single Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Makhetha Trust Baskop No. 542 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock N/A Rural Transferred

Maximo Plots No. 1154,1155,1156, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1307 & 1307, Private Xhariep Bethulie Kopanong Sulo Project Bethulie Land Agri Mixed Livestock crops Urban Transferred Subdivision 1 of the farm Private Xhariep Koffiefontein Letsemeng Masiakhane Rorichshoop No. 191 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry/Crops Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 118

Maximo Plots No. 1154,1155,1156, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1307 & 1307, Private Xhariep Bethuille Mohokare Mabokwe Trust Bethulie Land Agri Mixed Piggery Vegetables Rural Transferred

Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 119

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: LAND REDISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (LRAD) PROJECTS District District Municipality Town Nearest Local Municipality Name Project Property Description LandState TypeProduct Enterprise Production Type1 Production Type2 / UrbanRural ofProjectStatus Private Single Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Lebeko The farm Kopje No. 648 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Van der Merwe The farm Welgevonden No. 533 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Graigmount The farm Graimount No. 194 State Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Moedersgift The Farm Moedersgift No. 51 State Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Single Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Potsane The farm Johannasrust No. 645 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Boiteko Poultry Lakeview no.188 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred The farm Fairview No. 548 & Remaining extent of the farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Masakhane Groen Kloof No. 161 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Phuthanang / Portion 9 of the farm Moroka Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Midlands 11 3000 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry Rural Transferred Kopanang Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Dihwai Kopjeskraal No. 819 State Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Certain Subdivision 3 (Voorsorg) of the farm Fairview Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Xhalabile II No. 531 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 120

Private Poultry/ Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mokheleli Lanverwacht No. 864 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Remaining extent of farm Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mokheleli Tweefontein No. 1580 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Plot No. 26 , Martindale, Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Ipopeng Poultry Bloemfontein Land Agri Type Agri Poultry Urban Transferred The Farm Sannaspos No. 2850; Subdivision 9 of the farm Sannaspos No. 2850 & Manyaka(Sanna Subdivision 5 of the farm Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung spos) Goudpound 2614 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Plot 152, 153, 154, 166, 167 & 171 Agricultural Holding Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Zoko's Family Martindale SH AH, Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Remaing Extent of plot 57 Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Rakgogo Shanon Vally Settlement Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Urban Transferred Remaining extent of the farm Private Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Naledi Westridge Trust Westridge No. 570 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Single Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Ipswitch Trust The farm Ipswitch No.227 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Plot No. 100, 102, 103 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mafumahadi Highveld, Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Urban Transferred Certain portion 2 of the remaining extent of the farm Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Tsoha Bataung known as Braklaagte No. 848 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Subdivision 1 of the farm Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Mogotsi Motsoakae No. 449 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Remaining extent of the Farm Lindes Rust No. 353 & The farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Letsoara Die Dam No. 1011 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred The farm Klein Alida No. 515; The farm Klein Lindes No. 838 Mamokotlo & Portion 1 of the farm Linde's Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Development Rust No. 353 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops/dairy Rural Transferred The farm Thuishoek No. 2320 and The farm Brakfontein No. Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Boichoko 1358 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 121

Sebeela Plot No. 29 Martindale Small Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung (Plot 29, Holding, Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Urban Transferred Remainder of the farm Karrefontein No. 121 & The farm Wales No. 367: Farm Paddock No.459 Farm Highlands No.496 Farm Annex Elizabethfontein Private Veg/ Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Motsetse No.368 Land Agri Mixed Poultry Livestock Rural Transferred The remainder of the farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Dichaba Trust Langley Park No. 296 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Plot 49,Plot 50, Plot 51, Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Stuurman Bloemfontein Land Agri Type Agri Poultry Urban Transferred Plot 1 & 2 Martindale, Private Poultry/ Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Maetso Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Urban Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Botha Brothers The farm Belmont No. 932 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred

Thusanong Agricultural Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Enterprise Balquhidder 1967 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Plot 44,46,47 Hoeveld, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Fadimehang Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Urban Transferred Nthabeleng Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Project The farm Honingkop No. 2380 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mantsopa Phahameng Portion of the farm Deveron 815 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Plots 123 &124 Martindale, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Piston Piggery Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Urban Transferred Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Mohau Lot B22 Riet River Settlement Land Agri Mixed Dairy Vege Rural Remainder of the farm Ludlow Private Dairy/Live Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Khwelemthini No.2446 & Die Drif No.2689 Land Agri Mixed stock Vege Rural Transferred Likgang Simon Remainder of farm Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mofahla Eengevonden 2521 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Plots No.161 & 163 Shannon Stephan Valley Settlement & Constantia Private Veg/ Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Bopheka No.2341 Land Agri Mixed Poultry Livestock Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 122

Plot 113 Martindale, Private Veg/ Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Aganang Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Poultry Urban Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Bakgoele Plot 3 Highveld, Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Private Single Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Meisiesvlei Meisievlei No.457 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Beestehoek Beestehoek No.165 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Single Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Ipopelleng Berstevley No.617 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Plot 35, Martindale SH, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mayo Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mphuthi Family Scheeperu No.12 Land Transferred Plot 202 Lakeview, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Kgauhelo Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred NokhaFarm Plot 17, Grasslands, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Prod. Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Portion 1 & 3 of Farm Private Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Mojanaga Humewood 717 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Nongabe Padlangs 239 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Portion 5 & 6 of Private Single Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Mangwene the farm Rooibult No.445 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Molle Remaining extent of the farm Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Tjhebelopele Bathurst No. 2824 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Portion 1 of the Farm Gaelame & the Remainder Private Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Gaelame of The Farm Gaelame 245 Land Agri Type Agri Crops Rural Transferred Portion 2 of the farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Willie Jacobs Wonderkop No. 17 Land Agri Mixed Dairy Crops Rural Transferred Plot No. 17, Highveld Small Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Motshoane Holdings, Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Crops Livestock Rural Transferred Keleabetswe Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Trust Highveld Small Holdings no 79 Land Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 123

Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Bakgatla Trust The farm De Hoek No.69 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Mazibuko The farm Linde's Kroon No.516 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Remaining Extent of portion 11 Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Kgobe Project of farm Westminister Land Agri Mixed Crops Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Batlokoa Trust The farm Slangfontein No.560 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Portion 1 of Farm Martindale Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Mohlakoana No.533 Land Agri Mixed Poultry Livestock Rural Transferred Matladi Simon Private Crops/ Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Nyapotse Naanpoort No. 74 Land Agri Mixed Livestock poultry Rural Transferred Certain farm known as Malvern Private Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Naledi Malvern No. 335 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Portion 1 of the farm Srenthern Private Motheo Botshabelo Mangaung Kattlehong No. 396 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Xhalabile Constantia 457 Land Agri Type Agri Vege Urban Transferred Remainder of portion 1 of the farm Sanniesrust No. 933; Subdivision 5 of the farm Sanniesrust No. 933 & Subdivision 2 of the farm Private Single Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung 5 Star Group Rustplaats No. 1181 Land Agri Type Agri Poultry Rural Transferred Subdivision 9 (Edem) & Subdivision 10 (Rooiwai) of the Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Tyobeka farm Pardys No. 23 Land Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Kopanang Vernietveldt No. 15015 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Rural Private Single Motheo Katlehong Burgerslaagte No.664 Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural

Portion 6 of the farm Stoltzkop No. 134 & Remaining Extent of Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Motloung Family the farm Stoltzkop No. 134 Land Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Tsolo Trust P/3 of R/ Eemsgevonden Land Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 124

Remaining portion of the farm Vlakplaats No. 652; Portion 3 of Private Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Segai the farm Vlakplaats No. 652. Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Rural Remaining extent of the farm Private Single Motheo Winburg Mantsopa Mount Plasier Erfstuk No. 1579. Land Agri Type Agri Livestock Piggery Rural Transferred Remaining extent of the farm Private Single Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Kabelo Trust Athlone No. 447 Land Agri Type Livestock Rural Transferred Pro-Active Land Lower Malaika, Mieliespruit, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Acquisition Swartkoppies, Cecilia Land Agri Rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 125

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: LAND REDISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (LRAD) PROJECTS

District Municipality Local Municipality Nearest Town Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 UrbanRural / Status of Project Subdivision 1 of the farm Private Lejweleputswa Naledi Riverdale No. 289 Land Agri None None none rural Transferred Tswelopele Remaining portion of the farm Private Mixed livestock/ Lejweleputswa Veg. Florida 868 Land agri type agri crops piggery rural Transferred Remainder of the farm Alsace Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Nala Bothaville Seopasengwe No. 926 Land Agri type agri Poultry Vegetable rural Transferred Remaining extend of portion Lengau 3 (Goosen) of the farm Private Single Lejweleputswa Ramagala Merriespruit 219 Land agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Certain Remaining portion of the farm Paradys No. 23; Thabong Certain subdivision 1 (Uitkyk) Private Mixed veg.,broiler, Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Odendaalsrus farmers of the farm Paradys No.23. Land agri type agri Livestock piggery rural Transferred Plot 4 of Vredefontein Private Mixed Piggery/ Lejweleputswa Mmetlakgola Smallholdings Land agri type agri Dairy farming livestock rural Transferred Private Lejweleputswa Kutlwanong Colinfield No. 164 Land Transferred Portion 2 of the farm Klippan Private Mixed Broiler Lejweleputswa Moqhaka Lindley Ramaele No. 650 Land agri type agri Livestock Chickens rural Transferred Lewane Private Mixed chicken/ Lejweleputswa farmers cc Farm Noordhoek no.267 Land agri type agri Cattle farming veg/crop rural Transferred Plot No.5 Nolens Volens Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Masakhane Kleinplaase Land Agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 126

Subdivision 1 of the Farm Uitkyk No. 184 & Remaining Tshabalala Portion of the Farm Uitkyk Private Lejweleputswa Family No.184 Land Certain farm known as Stillewoning No. 1049 and Portion 1 of the farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Masilonyana Brandfort Banyane Trust Laslappie No. ??? Land agri type agri Livestock crops rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Lichaba Vogelvlei No.457 Land Agri type agri Livestock Crops rural Transferred Mokhathi Plot 2 and 3 Nolens Volens Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Theunissen Project Kleinplase, Theunissen Land Agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Lebona JohannesRus No.438 Land Agri type agri Sheep Vegetable rural Transferred Remainder of Portion 1 of the Mphosi Farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa (Portion 1) Mooivlakte No. 1303 Land Agri type agri Livestock Crops rural Transferred Confido Small Holding No. 8, Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Pitso Project Ventersburg Rd Land agri type agri Chickens piggery/veg. rural Transferred The remaining extent of the Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Nala Bothaville Thusanang farm Tweespruit No. 199. Land Agri type agri Sheep Crops rural Transferred Farm Doortocht No.974 & Farm Private Mixed chicken/veget Lejweleputswa Siyabonga Smartenswill No.821 Land Agri type agri piggery ables rural Transferred Portion 20 of the farm Bryan Multilayers No. 561 & Portion 25 of the Private Lejweleputswa Trading farm Bryan No. 561 Land None None None none rural Transferred Portion 10 of 6 of the farm Private Lejweleputswa PB Mpholo Schoonuitzicht No. 183 Land None None None None rural Transferred Basotho Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Letjhabile Rietkuil 182 Land Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Portion 8 of the farm Private Single Lejweleputswa Tjabane Constantia No. 457 Land Agri type agri piggery none rural Transferred Private Single Lejweleputswa Mothe Enkelbosch 181 Land Agri type agri Cattle farming none rural Transferred Mokoena Portion 1 of the farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Ngwathe Heilbron Family Katbosch No. 93 Land Agri type agri Dairy farming crop farming rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Setshego Cradocksia 468 Land Agri type agri Livestock crop farming rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 127

Remainder of the farm Jacobsdal No. 23 & Portion 3 Private Mixed sunflower/mai Lejweleputswa Mafabatho of the farm Uitkyk No. 25 Land Agri type agri Agri ze rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Mamorwa Tweespruit 198 Land Agri type agri piggery chicken/veg. rural Transferred Portion 1 of the farm Omega Motloung 1125 & Portion 1 of the farm Private Lejweleputswa Family Christiana No. 1121 Land Transferred Portion 1 Kinderagtig 173 & Private Single Lejweleputswa Reaikopanya Magrietasrust 1097 Land Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Private Single Lejweleputswa Zim The Farm Belmont No. 162 Land Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Portion 1 of the farm Lysberth Private Mixed chicken/Pigge Lejweleputswa Skosana No. 434 Land Agri type agri Vegetable ry rural Transferred Remainder of the farm Private Mixed chicken/Pigge Lejweleputswa Sisonke Cornelia 1076 Land Agri type agri Vegetable ry rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Molelengoana Goedehoop No.1075 Land Agri type agri Vegetable livestock rural Transferred Portion of the Farm Private Single Lejweleputswa Mokodutlo Uitsig 730 Land Agri type agri Beef none rural Transferred Remainder of the Farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Ventersburg Marumo Uitsig No. 730 Land Agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Letsoha Remainder of Uitsig 730 Land Agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Portion 1 of the farm Eben Private Single Lejweleputswa Khotule No.328 Land Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Portion 1 of the Farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Tsholofelo Lysberth 34 Land Agri type agri Livestock Crop/poultry rural Transferred Portion 2 of the farm Uitsig Private Single Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Ventersburg Chabane No.730 Land Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Private Single Lejweleputswa Sekae Eerstestap No.469 Land Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Private Single Production Lejweleputswa Mopereo Kinderagtig No.173 Land Agri type agri Honey none rural Transferred Portion 1 of the farm Private Single Lejweleputswa Nala Bothaville Xaba Tweespruit No. 199 Land agri type agri Cattle farming none rural Transferred Portion 13 of the farm Private Single Lejweleputswa Kananelo Merrispruit No. 219 Land agri type agri Poultry none rural Transferred Plots: Die Plaas Salt Pan35,66, 67,wag 'n bietjie, Private Single Salt Lejweleputswa Tswelopele Soutpan Mbolekwa Die Plaas Tusschen, Erfdeel Land Agri type agri production none rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 128

Hlangani Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Moqhaka Steynsrus Mahlapo Farm De Hoogte No.800 Land Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Theunissen Rakhongoana The farm Nelspant No. 484 Land Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Private Single Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Theunissen Manyalla Lucerne No.156 Land Agri type agri Poultry none rural Not yet Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Theunissen Ramoholi Plaas Komma Land Agri type agri crops Animal rural Transferred Portions 2&3 of the farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Masilonyana Winburg Lebetsa Klipplaatsfontein No.37 Land Agri type agri Poultry piggery/veg. rural Transferred The remaining portion of the Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Moqhaka Kroonstad Mafokosi farm Letaba No. 257. Land Agri type agri Poultry Vegetable rural Transferred Makgulong a Private Mixed piggery/livesto Broiler Lejweleputswa Matala Plot 9/Contantia Kleinplase Land Agri type agri ck Chickens rural Transferred Private Single Lejweleputswa Ntsonta Erfenis no.1940 Land agri type agri Cattle farming none rural Transferred Certain portion known as Le Souvenir 581 of the farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Thakamakhoa Vredefontein-Oost No. 299 Land Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Belengwane Ebenhaezer No. 401 Land Agri type agri Chickens piggery rural Transferred Private Single Lejweleputswa Sandvet Brayn no.561 Land Agri type agri Vegetable none rural Transferred Portion 2 of the farm Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Mathobisa Koolspruit No. 226 Land Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Plot no.5 Vredefontein,Landbouhoewe Private Mixed Lejweleputswa Mosala s Land Agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Portion known as Susannaskuil No. 114 of the farm Engelbrechtslaagte No. 306; The remaining portion of the farm Engelbrechtslaagte No. 306; The remaining Sibongile portion of subdivision 1 of the Trust farm Engelbrechtslaagte No. (Engelbrechtsl 306; The farm Lionriver No. Private Comm Lejweleputswa Ngwathe Koppies aagte) 154; Plot No. Land onage rural Transferred Portion 6 of the farm Stoltzkop No. 134 & Motloung Remaining Extent of the farm Private Lejweleputswa Family Stoltzkop No.134 Land Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 129

Private Lejweleputswa Tsolo Trust P/3 of R/ Eemsgevonden Land Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 130

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: LAND REDISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (LRAD) PROJECT District District Municipality Local Municipality Town Nearest Name Project Property Description LandState TypeProduct Enterprise Production Type1 Production Type2 / UrbanRural ofProjectStatus Portion 2 Single Thabo (Rooikoppie)/Garrieskop Agri Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Seopi 330, Senekal N/A Agri Type Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Certain portion known as Mofutsanyane Mokhethi Heel Vroeg No 2292 N/A Agri Not yet Thabo Maluti a Portion 123 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Phofung Peteletsang 1903 Land Agric Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Masechaba State Mofutsanyane Phofung Qwaqwa (Unit 1.35) Portion 70 of farm 1903 Land Agri Mixed Crop Dairy rural Transferred Single Thabo Portion 104 of farm 1903 State Agri Mofutsanyane Lebitsa Harrismith Land Agric Type Livestock N/A Rural Transferred Remainder Plot 51 Eden Thabo Small Holdings, Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Eden No. 51 Bethlehem N/A Agri Mixed Poultry Vegetables rural Cancelled Single Thabo Maluti a Portion 73 of the farm State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Bestervlei (Unit 3.23) 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Type Livestock N/A Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Mofutsanyane Phofung Kestel Mokoena Family Spuytfontein no. 567 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Beef rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Tshabalala Family Welgevonden 98 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Reitikile Farm Prieska No 3 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Ndlovu Farmers Bergkrans 877 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Vegetables Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 131

Thabo Mofutsanyane Phumelela Warden Welgevonden Welgevonden No 471 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Crops Rural Cancelled Thabo Maluti a State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlake-Dihwai Portion 85 of farm 1903 Land Agric Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 87 of farm 1903, State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlake-Dihwai Harrismith Land Agric Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 96 of farm 1903, State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Unit 1.33 Unit 1.33 Land Agri Mixed Crop Dairy Rural Not yet Thabo Maluti a Portion 20 of farm 1840 State Mofutsanyane Phofung Qwaqwa Unit 411 Betlhem Land Agric Mixed Crop Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a State Mofutsanyane Phofung Qwaqwa Lengoabala Unit 3.15 Portion 84 of farm 1903 Land Agric Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Single Thabo Agri Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Mokhethi Enterprise Vlakplaas No 1394 N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Transferred Thabo Subdivison 2 & 3 of the Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Pax Farming farm Pax No. 498 N/A Agric Mixed Cattle Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Marquard Mohapi Family Breevoorde No 82 N/A Agri Mixed Poultry Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Breevoorde & Marijako Mofutsanyane Setsoto Marquard Mojaje Family No. 197 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Sheep rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlake-Dihwai Portion 86, Farm 1903 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a State Mofutsanyane Phofung Unit 1.33(Tshabalala) Portion 96 of farm 1903 Land Agri Transferred Thabo Bitterwater Bitterwater No. 147 Mofutsanyane Phumelela Vrede Subdivision Subdivision 1 Agri Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Motloung Farm Erfenis 1689 N/A Agri Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 20 of farm 1840 State Mofutsanyane Phofung Unit 411 Betlhem Land Agri Mixed Dairy Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Lengoabala State Mofutsanyane Phofung (Unit 3.15) Portion 14 of farm 1840 Land Agric Transferred Single Thabo Maluti a Unit 3.13 State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Kestel (Motaung Family) Portion 10 of farm 1840 Land Agric Type Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Esibusisweni State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith (Unit. 1.22) Portion 54 Farm 1903 Land Agri Mixed Dairy Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Libata Tsa Goeiehoop No.1633 & Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Makgolokoe Soeterus No.1634 N/A Agri Mixed Crop Cattle Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 132

Rem. of Farms Thabo Maarman 135 & Afval Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg GP Didebe 166 N/A Agri 0 Transferred Thabo Portion 2 of Farm Berlin Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Makhalane Farming 473 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Khasebe Farmers Farm Riga 303 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Kgotso Farming Portion 75 of farm 1903 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 150(of 69) Farm Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith SP and AL Chabalala 1903 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Itumeleng Farmers The farm Mortlake 298 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Single Thabo Agri Mofutsanyane Setsoto Ficksburg Kwetliso The farm Dorpsgronden N/A Agri Type Beef Rural Cancelled Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Sw and Da Matasabe Rem. of Verblijding 1171 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Thabo The farm Jaskraal No. Mofutsanyane Jaskraal Community 91& Hebron No. 978 N/A Agri Transferred Thabo Portion 10 of 6 of Mofutsanyane PB Mpholo Schoonuitzicht 183 N/A Agri Single Thabo Maluti a State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Unit 2.01 Unit 2.01 Farm 1903 Land Agri Type Dairy Rural Not yet Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Tsiu Family Bankfontein 22 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Remainder of the Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Mokoena Trust farmKoeberg 921 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Poultry rural Transferred Single Thabo Maluti a Portion 21 farm 1903 State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Nyollah Trust Harrismith Land Agric Type Livestock N/A Rural Transferred Portion 1 of the farm Omega 1125 & Portion 1 Single Thabo of the farm Christiana Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Clarence Motloung No. 1121 N/A Agri Type Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 6 of the farm Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Molakeng 1813 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Crop Rural Transferred Portion 1 of thefarm Omega 1125 & portion 1 Single Thabo of the farm Christiana Agri Mofutsanyane Motloung 1121 N/A Agric Type Dairy Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 133

Single Thabo Farm Mooihoek 370 & Agri Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Mopeli Family Bethel 654 N/A Agri Type Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Mbele Trust Paneis No 922 N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Itekeng Bataung Delta 44 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Lebaka Trust Farm Midden 632 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Hendriksdeel(Remainder Mofutsanyane Phumelela Vrede Grootvlei Community ) No 1720 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Poultry Rural Transferred Remaining extent of the Thabo farm Aasvogelkrans No. Mofutsanyane Phumelela Vrede Pramkop 800 N/A Agri Mixed Crop Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Plot No.5 of Farm Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Mokhobo Koekemoers Rekwest N/A Agri Mixed Piggery Poultry Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Bafokeng Mombasa 419 N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 1 of Farm Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Kubetu Lilyfontein N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred Single Thabo Portion 1 (Monte Carlo) Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Sithole of the farm Telecraaf 508 N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Transferred Thabo Stoltzkop No 134(Portion Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Motloung Family 6 & Remaining Restant) N/A Agri Mixed Beef Sheep Rural Transferred Thabo Swartfontein 284 & Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Itumeleng Groenfontein 51 N/A Agri Mixed Piggery Cattle Rural Transferred Single Thabo Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Mantsha Tlala The farm Dankbaar N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Transferred Single Thabo Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Mathole Farmers De Pan No. 292 N/A Agri Type Piggery Rural Not yet Thabo Mofutsanyane Batho Ba Kopane Kampfontein No.62 N/A Agri Not yet Thabo Maluti a Portion1 farm klein Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Nhlapo Trust Drakensburg 256 N/A Agri Mixed Beef Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Langkloof Trust Langkloof No. 34 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Crop Rural Not yet Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Windhoek Windhoek 902 N/A Agri Mixed Diary Crop Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 134

Thabo Remaining of the farm Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Mphou Family Stoffelina 1247 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Cattle Rural Transferred Remaining extension of Thabo farm Schaapvlei No. Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Schaapvlei Trust 1239 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Crop Rural Transferred Portion 1 of Remaining Thabo Extent of farm Millicent Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Paul Roux Millicent Excelsior 1247 & Excelsior 1487 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Crop Rural Transferred Single Thabo Portion 3 of the Farm Agri Mofutsanyane Phumelela Warden Mashiloane Trust Early Flats No.41 N/A Agri Type Dairy rural Transferred Thabo Portion of Farm Mofutsanyane Makabelane Trust Hermanus No.380 N/A Agri Not yet Dipka N0.471,Platelayers Single Thabo Maluti a No.182 & Dipka C Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Kestel Makhobo & Nzimande No..509 N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dipali Family Trust Concordia No.39 N/A Agri Transferred Thabo Remaining Extent of the Mofutsanyane Taaso Farm Concordia No.1342 N/A agri Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Maduna Litelu Cronje 1466 N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlake-Dihwai Portion 86, Farm 1903 Land Agric Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlake-Dihwai Portion 85 of farm 1903 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 87 of farm 1903, State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlake-Dihwai Harrismith Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a UNIT 4.13 State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith (Tshabalala) Portion 14 of farm 1840 Land Agri Mixed Dairy Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Motlokoa Family Portion 21 of Farm 1903 N/A Agri Mixed BEEF crop rural Transferred Thabo Portion 28 of farm State Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem 1840 (Unit 420) Portion 28 of farm 1840 Land Agri Mixed Piggery Dairy Rural Not yet Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Ficksburg Roelofsrust Roelofsrust No.564 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Sheep Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Ndlebe & Dlamini Eerste Geluk 351 N/A Agri Mixed Beef Crops Rural Transferred Thabo Bovenland 73 and Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Senokoane Berendina 287 N/A Agri Mixed Beef Sheep Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 135

Thabo Maluti a Von Maltitz(Portion 104 State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Von Maltitz of farm 1903) Land Agri Mixed Cattle Dairy Rural Transferred Single Thabo Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Mphuth Trust Scheeperu No.12 N/A Agri Type Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Mabaso Farm Onvergund 458 N/A Agri Mixed Crop Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Mokoena Trust Eedensdag No.112 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Beef Rural Transferred Thabo Remaining portion of the Mofutsanyane Mashaeng farm De Zolder No. 70 N/A Agri Mixed Crop Cattle rural Transferred Remaining Extend of farm Kabosch no 787 & Single Thabo Subdivision 6 (of 5 of Agri Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Zwane & Radebe Katbosch 787) N/A Agri Type Dairy Rural Transferred Single Thabo Maluti a Portion 16 of farm 1903 State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Mahlatsi Trust Harrismith Land Agric Type Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Tsotetsi Trust N/A Agri Single Thabo Maluti a The farm Stelleerust No Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Tsotetsi Family 991 N/A Agri Type Dairy Rural Not Yet Thabo Mofutsanyane Sefatsa Angora No 589 N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Not Yet Single Thabo The farm Marthinas Dal Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Motaung & Moloi No. 539 N/A Agri Type Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Portion 25 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Unit 4.23 1840 Land Agric Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Portion 23 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Werda 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Remaining Extent of farm Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Toko Farmers Schalkie No 1761 N/A Agri Mixed Piggery Cattle Rural Transferred Subdivision 11 of Portion Single Thabo 7 of farm Zuid- Agri Mofutsanyane Apple Project Wolhuterskop No 670 N/A Agri Type Apples rural Single Thabo Maluti a Portion 58 of the farm State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Iphe Bohlale 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Type Dairy Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 136

Single Thabo Maluti a Portion 9 of the farm State Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith De Bult 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Type Crop Rural Transferred Single Thabo Portion 71 of the farm State Agri Mofutsanyane Unit 1.43 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Type Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 144 of 101 of the State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Humewood Unit 4 farm 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Thabo Maluti a Portion 145 of 101 of the State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Humewood Unit 2 farm 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Thabo Maluti a Portion 146 of 101 of the State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Humewood Unit 3 farm 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Remainder of portion 101 Thabo Maluti a of the farm 1903 State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Humewood Unit 1 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 115 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 115 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 116 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 116 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Portion 117 of the farm State Mofutsanyane S.J. Twala 1903 Land Agric Rural Thabo Weltevrede Portion 117 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 117 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 118 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 118 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 119 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 119 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 120 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 120 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 121 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 121 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 122 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 122 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 124 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 124 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 125 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 125 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 137

Thabo Weltevrede Portion 126 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 126 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 127 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 127 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 128 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 128 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 129 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 129 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 130 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 130 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Weltevrede Portion 131 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Portion 131 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Weltevrede Portion 132 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Portion 132 1903 Harrismith Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Portion 28 of the farm State Mofutsanyane Unit 4.20 1840 Land Agric Rural Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Yeomary Koppjies Agri

Stoltzkop No.134(Portion 6) & Remaining Extent Motloung Family of Stoltzkop No.134 N/A Transferred Tsolo Trust P/3 of R/ Eemsgevonden N/A Transferred Thabo Maluti a Remainder of farm Lotti Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Motsatse Trust No. 1038 N/A Agri Mixed Dairy Beef rural Cancelled Morake N/A none

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 138

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: LAND REDISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (LRAD) PROJECTS District Municipality Local Municipality Nearest Town Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 UrbanRural / Status of Project Mixed Fezile Dabi Nketoane Lindley Mapoulwane Klippan No.650 Private Agri type agri Beef Crops rural Transferred Plotno.778,772,807,103 7,1039,1064,363 and 617 of the Kopjes Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Ikemeleng Poultry irrigation selltement Private agri type agri Poultry none rural Transferred Erf 1044,381,802, 382, 383, 1045, 732 of Kopjes Nedersittting, Mixed chicken Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Mogano (Plot 390) Koppies Private agri type agri crops farming rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Nketoane Lindley Amankwane Family Francinas Post 701 Private Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Farm Kruidfontein 2134 & Masike and Farm Antoniesheim Mixed chicken/veget Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Steynsrus Monokane 2153 Private Agri type agri Livestock ables rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Mosia Geschenk No.137 Private Agri type agri Livestock Crops rural Transferred Eerste Geluk 461, Domucuster 1075 & Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Heilbron Sawukazi Lynvalley 1025 Private Agri type agri Livestock crops rural Transferred Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Heilbron Mosibi Weverdient No. 1076 Private Agri type agri Livestock none rural Not yet Nedersitting Plot No. Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Modikoe 379, 627 & 801 Private Agri type agri piggery Vegetable rural Transferred Farm Johannes Rust Single Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Mojaki 243 Private Agri type agri Cattle farming none rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 139

Single Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Moqhaka Chickens Marksman No.1024 Private Agri type agri Chickens none rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Heilbron Grow Together The farm Grootkuil 1167 Private Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Marinshoek No.16 Fezile Dabi Mahlatsi Family 1903/106 Private 4 Remaider of the farm Fezile Dabi Mokoena Trust Koeberg No. 92 Private Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Metsimaholo Sasolburg Tolo Rietfontein 177 Private Agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Mbele The farm Paleis No. 922 Private Agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred The Remaining potion of the farm Steenwerp 1840; The farm Steenwerp No. 2150; Portion 2 of the farm Single Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Lefona Family Riverdale No. 289 Private agri type agri Cattle farming none rural Transferred Single Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Mangope Gelukswaarts 2233 Private agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Mokoena Trust Edie 392 Private Agri type agri Livestock none rural Not yet Portion1 of the farm Klein Drakensburg No. Fezile Dabi Nhlapo Trust 256 Private Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Steynsrus Mabaso Onvergund Private Agri type agri Livestock Crops rural Transferred Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Gila Trust Morester No.192 Private Agri type agri Livestock none rural Not yet Mokoena Boedery Mixed Fezile Dabi Mafube Frankfort Trust Brakfontein No. 1392 Private Agri type agri Sheep Vegetable rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Teboho Trust Rotterdam 242 Private agri type agri Livestock crops rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Parys Nosenga Farm Eureka no.1083 Private agri type agri crops stock Farming rural Transferred Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Heilbron Mokhoantle Spookfontein No. 552 Private Agri None None none rural Transferred Single Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Mokonutlo Rotterdam 242 Private Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Plot 158 Nedersetting, Plot 188 Koppies Nedersetting, Plot 190 Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Kroonstad Dlomo Koppies Nedersetting Private Agri type agri Livestock none rural Not yet

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 140

Subdivision 1 of the farm Private Mixed piggery/ Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Mkhwanazi Vlakdam No. 1162 Land Agri type agri boiler veg. rural Portion known as Bestedeel 1949 of the Private Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Sentebale farm Boschjesspruit 589 Land Agri type agri Beef crop farming rural Transferred Remaining extent of the farm Leewfontein No. 143 and Subdivision 3 of the farm Leewfontein Private Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Fixane No. 143 Land Agri type agri Livestock crop farming rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 141

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: COMMONAGES District District Municipality Town Nearest Local Municipality Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 Rural Urban / Status of Project Koffiefontein Private Xhariep Koffiefontein Letsemeng Commonage Sub of Rooidraai farm no.190 Land Commonage Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Preezfontein North No.1603 ofo the farm Jagersfontein No.14 & Jagersfontein certain farm Preezfontein North Private Xhariep Jagerfontein Kopanong Commonage No.927 Land Commonage Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Philippolis Portions 2 & 4 of Erf 276, Private Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Commonage Philippolis Land Commonage Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Edenburg Remaining farm Vaalplaat Private Xhariep Edenburg Kopanong Commonage no.478 & Welgeluik no.477 Land Commonage Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Remaining portion of the portion Petrusburg known as Convay No.1088 of Private Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Commonage the farm Doornplaat No. 475 Land Commonage Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 142

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: COMMONAGES District Municipality Nearest Town Local Municipality Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 UrbanRural / Status of Project Remainder of the Farm Lemoenhoek No. 415: Remainder of the farm Gorra'sstad No. 75: Subdivision 2 of the farm Gorra'sstad No. 75; Subdivision 3 of the farm Gorra'sstad No. 75 The farm Samestrek No. 1008 & Hobhouse Subdivision 4 of the farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Commonage Gorra'sstad No. 75 Land Commonage Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred Single Dewetsdorp Private Type Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Commonage Elim Frankfurt Land Agri Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 143

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: COMMONAGE PROJECTS District Municipality Local Municipality Town Nearest Project Name Property Description State Land Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type2 UrbanRural / ofProjectStatus Portion 3 of the farm Morgenzon No.455; Remainder of portion 2 of the farm Morgenzon No. 455; Remainder of portion 1 of the farm Morgenzon No. 455; Portion 5 of the farm Doornplaat No. 438; Portion 6 of the farm Bultfontein Doornplaat No. 438; Remainder Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Tswelopele Bultfontein Commonage of the farm G Land agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Remainder of the farm Mersy No. 284, The farm Reclaim No. 710, Remaining portion of the farm Verlaatspruit-Noord No. Bothaville 145 & Subdivision 1 of the farm Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Nala Bothaville Commonage Verlaatspruit-Noord No. 145 Land agri Vegetable, Poultry dairy,piggery rural Transferred

Certain remaining portion of the farm Zoeterust 203 and Certain Wesselbon remainng portion of the farm Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Nala Wesselsbron Commonage Oranjevlei 174 Land agri Livestock vegetable/canddle rural Transferred Bothaville Portion 1 of the farm Ancona Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Commonage 596 Land agri Poultry Vegetable rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 144

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: COMMONAGES District District Municipality Local Municipality Town Nearest Name Project Property Description LandState Product Type Enterprise Production Type1 Production Type 2 / UrbanRural ofProjectStatus

Certain portion known as Single Thabo Arlington Trekkerswee Farm No. 919 of Agri Mofutsanyane Nketoane Arlington Commonage the farm Wexford No. 265 N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Transferred Thabo Clarens Saron No.1205 Franschoek Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Commonage No.1208 N/A Agri Rural Transferred

Remainder of farm Smaldeel No. 31, Portion 1 of the farm Smaldeel No. 32, Spesbona No. Thabo Fouriesburg 60, Witbankiesfontein No. 185, Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Commonage Lanquedoc No. 376 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Single Thabo Rosendal Remainder of farm Elim & Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Commonage Libertas N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Remaining portion of the farm Langpunt No. 232 & the Thabo Warden remaining portion of Hester No. Mofutsanyane Phumelela Warden Commonage 1590 N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Rietz The farm Tabora & Mofutsanyane Nketoane Reitz Commonage Boesmaskop N/A Agri Mixed Livestock Cattle Rural Thabo Bethlehem Remaining Portion of Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Commonage Vogelfontein no.69 N/A Agri Mixed Cattle Vegetables rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 145

The remaining portion of the Single Thabo Memel farm Mooipan No. 625, portion 1 Agri Mofutsanyane Phumelela Memel Commonage of the farm Driehoek No. 652 N/A Agri Type Cattle Rural Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 146

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: COMMONAGES PROJECTS District District Municipality Local Municipality Nearest Town Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 UrbanRural / Status of Project Farm Sterkstroom, Groenland & Heilbron Kromhoek,Reskromhoek, Nil Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Heilbron Commonage Desperandum Private Commonage type agri Livestock none rural Transferred

Remainder of the farm Bochkop No. 220 & Remaining extent of the farm Wildehondekop No. 396 & Portion 1 of the farm Wildehondekop No. 396 & Remainder of subdivision 3 of the farm Bochkop 220 & Portion 4 (of 3) of the farm Parys Bochkop 220 & The farm Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Parys Commonage Klipbos 445 Private Commonage type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Subdivision 8 of the farm Vredefort No. 148; Certain portion 9 of the farm Vredefort No. 148; Portion 2 of the farm Lincoln No. 541; Portion 3 of the farm Lincoln No. 541; The "rest" portion of the farm Lincoln No. Vredefort 541; Subdivision 1 of the farm Mixed carpentry/b Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Vredefort Commonage Schulp Sp Private Commonage type agri Livestock ricks rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 147

Steynsrus Mixed dairy, Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Steynsrus Commonage Marais Rust No381 Portion 1 Private Commonage type agri Poultry piggery rural Transferred Subdivision 1 of the farm Boschpoort No. 558; Remainder of the farm Riverdale No. 289; Remainder of the farm Boschpoort No. 558; Subdivision 2 of the farm Rosendal No. 289; Remainder of the farm Lamington Hastings veg/ Kroonstad No. 283; Remainder of the farm Mixed dairy, Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Commonage Gelukwaart Private Commonage type agri Livestock piggery rural Transferred Edenville Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Edenville Commonage Ebenhaezer No.1455 Private agri type agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred

Subdivision 1 of the farm Erfenis No. 459; The farm Stella No. Steynsrus 762; Certain subdivision 1 of the Private Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Steynsrus Commonage farm Vogelvlei No. 457. Land Commonage type agri Livestock veg./crops rural Transferred Subdivision 1 of the farm Winningdate No. 200; Remainder of the farm Kroonstad Riverdale No. 289; Subdivision Commonage 1 of the farm Boschpoort No. Private Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Extention 558 Land Commonage type agri Livestock crops rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 148

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: SETTLEMENT LAND ACQUISATION GRANT (SLAG) PROJECTS District Municipality Nearest Town Local Municipality Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 Rural Urban / Status of Project Dipelaneng Tsoha-o- Constantia Drift No.311 & the Private Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Iketsetse farm Kleinpoortje No.409 Land Agri Mixed Poultry Vegetables Rural Transferred Private Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Moroke Khooa Erven No. 339 & 340, Phillipolis Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred Remaining extent of farm Boomplaat No. 219, remaining portion of farm Roodewal No. 330, subdivision 3 (2) of farm Weltevreden No. 66 and remaining portion of subdivision Private Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Yimpumeleo of farm Weltevreden No. 60. Land Transferred Portion of Vadersgift No. 969 of Private Vege/ Xhariep Rouxville Mohokare Ntlangeni farm Cypress Grove No. 304 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry Urban Transferred Le Souvenir 581 of the Farm Private Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Thakamakhoa Vredefontein Land Transferred Private Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Mokhoto Khooa Erven No's 365,338, Philippolis Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred Plot Nr. 70 of Highveld Small Private Xhariep Zastron Mohokare Ngxito Farmers Holdongs, Bloemfontein Land Transferred Aganang/ Rietrivier Nedersetting Oos No. Private Xhariep Jacobsdal Letsemeng Jacobsdal A27 and B86, Jacobsdal Land Agri Mixed Livestock crops Rural Transferred Tswelopele Private Xhariep Phillippolis Kopanong Farmers Farm Vlakdam Land

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 149

Thusanang/ Private Xhariep Petrusburg Letsemeng Petrusburg Klein Bloem No1016 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Erven No. 1123, 1124, 1125 & Private Xhariep Bethulie Kopanong Mnebe Trust 1126, Phillipolis Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Transferred Iketsetseng Private Poultry Duikfontein Land Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 150

Portions known as Plots 136, 141of the portion known as Bloemspruit "B" No. 2232 of the farm Bloemspruit "A" No. 2144; Portions known as Plots 176, 177 of the portion known as Single Bloemspruit "C" No. 332 of the Private Type Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Khuzela farm Bloemspruit "A" No. 2144. Land Agri Agri Livestock Urban Transferred Westminister Subdivision of the farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Ikaheng Project Somerset No. 866 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Kgolaganang Plot 177, lakeview kleinplase Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Urban Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung Papfontein Rankelenyane no.831 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Plot 136 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 136 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 79 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 79 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 151

Plot 105 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 105 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Plot 4 Grassland Plot 4 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Plot 2 Grassland Plot 2 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 142 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 142 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 134 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 134 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 68 (1) Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 68 (1) Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 41 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 41 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 106 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 106 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 44 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 44 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 78 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 78 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 109 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 109 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 45 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 45 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Plot 5 Grassland Plot 5 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 42 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 42 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 82 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 82 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 115 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 115 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 112 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 112 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 65 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 65 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 152

Plot 80 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 80 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 83 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 83 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 34 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 34 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 72 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 72 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 47 (3) Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 47 (3) Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 36 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 36 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 71 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 71 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 70 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 70 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 31 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 31 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Plot 85 Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Grassland Plot 85 Grassland Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Grassland Smallholdings Grassland Smallholdings Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Phase 2 Phase 2 Land Settlement Housing N/A N/A Urban Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Bafokeng Trust Waterval farm no.278 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Single Subdivision 1 of the Farm Private Type Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Likatlong Likatlong Land Agri Agri Rural Transferred Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mantsopa Itekeng Trust Frankford Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred The remaining portion of the Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Moleme farm Vallbank No.619 Land Agri Rural Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Tsohang balemi The farm Bellevue No. 549 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Thusanang The farm Jeppe No. 577 Land Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 153

Fullerton/ Sannahspot No.360,Fullerton Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Ipopeng 405,Brakfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Dintlwane De Hoek 651 Land Agri Mixed Livestock vege Urban Transferred Remainder of the farm Middelspruit No. 398 & The Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Khama Trust farm Sterkfontein No. 127 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Qalo Trust Portion no.280 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry/Vege Rural Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung Jeleteng Sepane No. 7 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry Rural Transferred Single Private Type Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Lekhula Project Willow Park 434 Barg721 Land Agri Agri Livestock Rural Transferred Single Private Type Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Tsoara ka thata Sannaspost No. 276 Land Agri Agri Vegetables Rural Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Impala Sterkfontein No. 83 Land Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung Contest Contest Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung Springside Springside farm Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred State Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung Mameno The farm Tshepong No. 836 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry Rural Single Likatlong 25 Private Type Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Nikelo Land Agri Agri Livestock Rural Transferred

Diepwater / Motswedi No 614 Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Motswedi Land Agri Mixed Livestock crops Rural Transferred

Kgotsong De Hoek N. 69 Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung (Rustfontein) Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Remainder of the farm Marthinus deel No. 312, Thaba Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Naledi Phomolong Nchu Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Lomahanyane le Private Motheo Wepener Naledi eme mmoho Cavallo no.20 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 154

Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Kopano/Mamello The farm Besemakop No. 1808 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Nkomo Plot no.17 Geluk Kleinplase Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Urban Transferred Plots 118 & 119 Grassland, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Dindi 1 Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vegetables Rural Transferred Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Ramaditse Ramaditse No.22 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred

Rust en Vrede 1876,Marah Ramaporama/Mo 420,Goudpond 2614, Bourdillon Private Motheo Mangaung limo O Lerato 1877,Valle 1006,Klipkraal 117 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Kent Project Farm kent 286 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred State Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Sadiba sa Lerato Farm Leratong 835 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Portion 1(Middlepunt) of portion De Bruis Rust 937 Of the Farm Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Matladi Glen Alphen No. 74 Land Transferred Itereleng Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Vegetable Rodenburg 103 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Nassau Project Nassau no. 346 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Plot 131, grasslands, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Dindi 2 Bloemfontein Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Kaalspruit The farm Kaalspruit 491 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Monateng - Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Richter Waterpas No. 294 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Plot No. A24 of Modderrivier Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Itereleng settlement East, Jacobsdal Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Eumarella / Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Bapong/thabang bapong, Botshabelo 21 Farms Land Agri Mixed Livestock Poultry/Vege Rural Transferred State Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Fonteindraai Farm Fonteindraai No.232 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 155

Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Mangaung Ha-Khosi middlespruit 398 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Selfhelp Plot 16, 'geluk smallholdings Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Urban Transferred Private Single Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Thipa Thipa 447 - fp Land Agri Type Livestock Rural Transferred Private Motheo Thaba Nchu Mangaung Batshweneng Farm 494-495, 427 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crop Rural Molokoane/ Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Homeward Homeward No. 717 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Dihwai Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Kopanang Ass Klipfontein 716 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Crops Rural Private Diepfontein No.2657 Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Alletta Land Landkuil 66, Dreyers 445 Private Motheo Dewetsdorp Naledi Kutlwanong and Kameelldoorns 402 Land Transferred Private Motheo Ladybrand Mantsopa Lekhula Project Land Transferred Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Thepa Jacobus Geluk Farm no.1016 Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege Rural Transferred Plot 10,11,12, Highveld, Private Motheo Bloemfontein Mangaung Thusono Batho Bloemspruit Land Agri Mixed Livestock Vege/Poultry Rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 156

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: SETTLEMENT LAND ACQUISITION GRANT (SLAG) PROJECTS DistrictMunicipality LocalMunicipality NearestTown ProjectName Property Description StateLand Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 Urban Rural / Statusof Project

Remaining extent of farm Dreyers 445,Remaining extent of farm Langkuil 66 Remaining extent of farm Private Mixed type poultry/ Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Odendaalsrus Kutwanong Kameeldoorns 402 Land Agri agri Livestock crops rural Transferred

The Remaining portion of the farm Palestina No. 95 & Subdivision 1 of the farm Ikgomotseng Palestina & The farm Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Masilonyana Brandfort Trust Padlangs No. 99 Land Agri agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Private Lejweleputswa Bokamoso Ventersvlakte Land Agri None None none rural Transferred

Subdivision 14 of consolidated farm Vaaldam Settlement No. 77; Subdivision 32 of the farm Metsimaholo/vuk Vaaldam Settlement No. Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa a-zenzele 1777 Land agri agri Livestock crops rural Transferred Subdivision 2 of of the farm Private Single type Salt Lejweleputswa Masilonyana Brandfort Moletsane Soutdal No. 947 Land Agri agri production none rural Transferred Portion known as Bestedeel Tswelopele 1949 of the farm Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Moqhaka Kroonstad boerdery Boschjesspruit 589 Land Agri agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 157

Remainder of the farm Geluk no.34 Subdivision 7 (Eeram) (of 3) of the farm Palestina no.95,Subdivision 4(langkuil) of thefarm Palestina no.95, Subdivision 8 of the farm Palestina no.95, subdivision Tsohang Le 5 of the farm Palestina no.95 Private Mixed type crops/ Lejweleputswa Masilonyana Brandfort iketeteng & Subdivision 6 of the farm Land agri agri Livestock vegetables rural Transferred Kgatelopele / Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Ipopeng Buitensorg No2 Land Agri agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred

Portion of Farms Wildehondekop No.396 Boschkop No.220 Private Lejweleputswa Tshwaranang Klipbos No.445 Land agri None None none rural Transferred

Certain subdivision 1 of the farm Avondster No. 594; Restant of the farm Uitsig No. 723; Subdivision 5 (Gedagtenis) of the farm Uitsig No. 723; Subdivision 6 Henneman (Kata) of the consolidated Private Common Mixed type Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Hennenman Commonage farm Strydfontein No. 211 Land age agri Livestock Vegetable rural Transferred Portion 38 (plot 16) of the Private Single type Lejweleputswa Kopano/Bryan farm Bryan 561 Land Agri agri vegetables none rural Transferred Eksteenstatie 647 & Lovat Private Lejweleputswa Sekekete Station 469 Land agri None None none rural Transferred Remainder of Portion 1 Phiri & Sons (Makoupan) of the farm State Mixed type Lejweleputswa Trust Rietkuil 122 Land Agric agri None none Rural Transferred Portion 2 of the farm Klippan Private Mixed type Broiler Lejweleputswa Moqhaka Lindley Ramaele No. 650 Land agri agri Livestock Chickens rural Transferred Plot 6 Nolens Volens, Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Makata Theunissen Land Agri agri Vegetable Poultry rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 158

Plot 158 Nedersetting, Plot 188 Koppies Nedersetting, Plot 190 Koppies Private Mixed type Cattle Lejweleputswa Dlomo Nedersetting Land agri agri farming cropfarming rural Transferred Extension of Farm Private Mixed type Broiler Lejweleputswa Dikgomo Society Danielsvlei 269 Land agri agri Livestock Chickens rural Transferred Remaining portion of the Private Mixed type stock Lejweleputswa Moalosi farm Soudal No. 947 Land agri agri farming crops rural Transferred Subdivision 4 of the farm Private Single type Lejweleputswa Mahlaku Project Vaalbank Land Agri agri crops none rural Transferred Lesedi Farming Portioin 2 (Floris) of the farm Private Single type Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Odendaalsrus Operations Paradys No. 23 Land Agri agri crops none rural Transferred Mokoena Family Portion 3 of the farm Minaars Private Mixed type stock Lejweleputswa Tokologo Boshof Trust 1596 Land Agri agri crops Farming rural Transferred Portion 3 of the Farm Private Lejweleputswa Mohapi Breevoorde No. 82 Land Transferred Wesselsbron Rooirand 172 &Portion 3 of Private Mixed type stock Lejweleputswa Trust Dampan 547 Land Agri agri crops Farming rural Transferred Private Mixed type chicken/ Lejweleputswa Olifant Trust Nedersetting Plot 391 Land Agri agri piggery vegetables rural Transferred Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Maja Plot 1 Nolens Kleinplase Land Agri agri Poultry crops rural Transferred

Portion 4 (Middelpunt) of the Farm Roode Krans No. Private Single type Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Ventersburg Bucheku 591 Land Agri agri piggery none rural Transferred Private Single type Lejweleputswa Monare Welgeluk No.347 Land Agri agri Livestock none rural Transferred Thusanang/ Private Mixed type Lejweleputswa Theunissen Jeppe no. 577 Land Agri agri Vegetable livestock rural Transferred Private Lejweleputswa Impala Excelsior Land Transferred

Remainder of the farm Aanleg No. 50; Remainder of Nyakallong the farm Paardevlei No. 251; Farmers Remainder of the farm Private Mixed type piggery/ Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Odendaalsrus Association Jeanette No. 371. Land Agri agri Poultry cattle rural N/A

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 159

Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 160

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: SETTLEMENT LAND ACQUISATION GRANT (SLAG) PROJECTS District District Municipality Local Municipality Nearest Town Name Project Property Description State Land TypeProduct Enterprise Production Type1 Production Type2 / UrbanRural ofProjectStatus Thabo Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Tshepo-E-Ntjha Welgevonden No. 90 N/A Agri Rural Transferred

Thabo Selepe/Breevoor Subdivision 2 (Sonop) of the Mofutsanyane Setsoto Marquard de farm Breevoorde No. 82 N/A Agri Rural Subdivision 14 of consolidated farm Vaaldam Settlement No. 77; Subdivision 32 of the farm Thabo Metsimaholo/vuk Vaaldam Settlement No. Mofutsanyane a-zenzele 1777 N/A Agri Transferred Portion 2 Single Thabo (Rooikoppie)/Garrieskop 330, Agri Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Seopi Senekal N/A Agri Type Crop Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Portion 1 of the farm Goede Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith Ke A Tshepa Hoop No.897 N/A Agri Rural Transferred Single Thabo Thusanang/Bethl Portion 3 (of 2) of the farm Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg ehem Retiefsnek 123 N/A Agri Type Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Iketsetseng Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Bethlehem Poultry The farm Duikfontein N/A Agric Transferred Thabo Eksteenstasie 647 & Lovat Mofutsanyane Nketoane Lindley Sekekete Station 469 N/A Agri Mixed Crop Livestock rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 161

Thabo Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Setai Goedehoop 584 N/A Agri Mixed Crop Livestock Rural Transferred Thabo Maluti a Esibusisweni Statet Mofutsanyane Phofung Qwaqwa (Unit 1.22) Unit1.22, Farm 1903 Land Agric Mixed Crop Dairy Rural Transferred Thabo Mokoena Family Portion 3 of the farm Minaars Mofutsanyane Trust 1596 N/A Agri Transferred Thabo Mofutsanyane Olifant Trust Nedersetting Plot 391 N/A Agri Transferred Single Thabo Maluti a Agri Mofutsanyane Phofung Harrismith The Siding The Siding No. 1859 N/A Agri Type Poultry Rural Not yet

Thabo Motsimo & Lorelei No. 1364 of the farm Mofutsanyane Setsoto Senekal Nyamoso Welgelegen No. 239 N/A Agri Mixed Piggery Vegetables Rural Single Thabo Fire Sesolo Agri Mofutsanyane Dihlabeng Fouriesburg Group Sewefontein 417 N/A Agri Type Grazing Rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 162

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: SETTLEMENT LAND ACQUISITION GRANT (SLAG) PROJECTS District Municipality Local Municipality Nearest Town Project Name Property Description State Land Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 UrbanRural / Status of Project

Certain Subdivision 3 of the farm Mooi-Plaats No.581, Subdivision3 of Knioppiesfontein No.94,Remainider of Knoppiesfontein No.94 & Remainder of the farm Mixed Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Heilbron Refeng Kgotso Pandam No.587 Private settlement type agri Crops livestock rural Transferred Itshokolele Fruit Subdivision 3 of erf 5246 Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad & Veg (Veilingskrale) Private Agri type agri Vegetable fruits rural Transferred Plot 3 Pistorius Rust Small Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Parys Mohapi Holdings, Parys Private Agri type agri Vegetable none rural Transferred Mixed Dairy livestock/ Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Colephi & Family Fontein 501 Private Agri type agri farming crops rural Not yet Portion 1 of the farm Mixed Piggery/ Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Morakabi Veblyding 2461. Private agri type agri crops livestock rural Transferred Mixed Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Steynsrus Setai Goedehoop 584 Private Agri type agri Livestock Crops rural Transferred Single Cattle Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Fry Schaapkraal 410 Private agri type agri farming none rural Transferred Single Fezile Dabi Mafube Frankfort Motloung The farm Erfenis No. 1689 Private Agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 163

Rooipoort consisting of 31 Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Parys Moroanyane titels Private agri type agri Livestock none rural Transferred Farm Aberdeen 530 & Fezile Dabi Mafube Frankfort Mafube Trust Ayr 75 Private settlement township None none urban Transferred Bricks and selling Fezile Dabi Ngwathe koppies Mabaso Fischer 58 Private None gravel Livestock none rural Transferred Tswelopele Single Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Farmers Vlakdam Private agri type agri Vegetables none rural Transferred Itekeng Chicken Plot No.99,100,103 & 104 Private Single Fezile Dabi Ngwathe Deneysville Abbator Farmers of Veekraal Small Holdings Land Agri type agri Chickens none rural Transferred Subdivision 1 of the farm Private Single Cattle Fezile Dabi Mafube Frankfort Kambule Twistniet No. 1374 Land Agri type agri farming none rural Transferred Democratic Remaining portion of of the Private Mixed dairy, Fezile Dabi Moqhaka Kroonstad Poultry farm Moed No. 1157 Land Agri type agri Poultry vegetables rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 164

PROGRAMME: REDISTRIBUTION GRANT TYPE: EXTENSION OF SECURITY OF TENURE ACT (ESTA) PROJECTS District District Municipality Local Municipality Town Nearest Project Name Property Description LandState Product Type Enterprise Production Type 1 Production Type 2 / UrbanRural ofProjectStatus Rooirand 172 Wesselsbron &Portion 3 of stock Lejweleputswa Trust Dampan 547 Private Land Agri Mixed type agri crops Farming rural Transferred Portion 4 (Middelpunt) of the Farm Roode Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng Ventersburg Bucheku Krans No. 591 Private Land Agri Single type agri piggery none rural Transferred Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 165

SETTLED RESTITUTION CLAIMS

Total Award No. Claim Approval Local R/U Claim No. of H/Hs No. of Ha Land Cost Financial RDG SPG Cost Claim Name Date Municipal Forms s BNFRS Comp. 1 Andriesfontein 16-07-2002 Mantsopa R 1 1 12 72 1407 275,000.00 68,748.00 27,000.00 12,960.00 383,708.00 2 Bethany LCC 19-06-1998 Kopanong R 1 1 81 502 5339 1,865,000.00 0 0 0 1,865,000.00 3 Dakpoort 11-07-2002 Phumelela R 1 1 1 6 856 0 0 0 0 40,000.00 4 Hoopstad 07-03-2003 Tswelopele U 18 18 18 53 34 23,720.00 403,240.00 3,000.00 1,440.00 431,400.00 5 Marabastad 11-03-2001 Moqhaka U 404 404 372 2424 0 5,008,000.00 1,456,000.00 939,000.00 0 7,403,000.00 6 Oppermansgronde 06-02-2003 Kopanong R 2 1 900 5400 34000 19,650.00 0 2,700,000.00 1,296,000.00 4,015,650.00 7 Herschel 30-06-2002 Mangaung R 1 1 129 774 1579 2,122,609.13 1,343,423.50 237,000.00 113,760.00 3,816,792.63 8 Palmietfontein 22-03-2002 Mangaung R 1 1 9 54 673 132,367.22 1,257,488.68 6,000.00 2,880.00 1,398,735.90 9 Platberg 1 & 2 10-06-2003 Mantsopa U 99 99 99 594 345 304,500.00 812,000.00 177,000.00 84,960.00 1,445,060.00 10 Senekal 31-01-2002 Setsoto U 332 332 332 1992 0 32,000.00 5,280,000.00 6,000.00 2,880.00 5,320,880.00 11 Thaba-Patchoa 09-06-2003 Mantsopa R 4 4 58 348 1551 1,973,200.00 0 174,000.00 83,520.00 2,230,720.00 12 Dealsville 20-02-2004 Tokoloho U 68 68 46 200 10 1,739,440.00 0 177,000.00 84,960.00 2,001,400.00 13 Bothaville 20-02-2004 Nala U 510 510 102 2550 0 0 13,045,800.00 0 0 13,045,800.00 14 Bultfontein 20-02-2004 Tswelopele U 196 196 196 1176 0 51,600.00 4,962,080.00 6,000.00 2,880.00 5,022,560.00 15 Bohlokong 20-04-2004 Dihlabeng U 1 1 167 1004 0 0 110,103.00 0 0 110,103.00 16 Blesbokfontein 09-05-2004 Tswelelopele R 1 4 459 945 2326 3,097,000.00 0 1,377,000.00 660,960.00 5,134,960.00 17 Dewetsdorp 30-06-2004 Naledi U 46 46 46 267 0 210,830.00 1,749,839.00 15,000.00 7,200.00 1,982,869.00 18 Viljoenskroon 01-07-2004 Moqhaka U 1 1 0 0 63 60,000.00 0 3,000.00 1,440.00 64,440.00 19 Mangaung 08-03-2005 Mangaung U 20 20 100 320 0 285,000.00 0 57,000.00 27,360.00 1,151,988.63 20 Ventersburg 01-06-2005 Matjhabeng U 5 5 10 110 0 0 200,000.00 0 0 200,000.00 399,960.0 399,96 21 Lindley 07-07-2005 Nketoana U 9 9 9 76 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 80,000.0 80,00 22 Taioe family claim 08-07-2005 Setsoto U 1 1 3 27 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 166

40,000.0 40,00 23 Lechalaba claim 08-07-2005 Ngwathe U 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 200,000.0 3,000. 1,440 244,44 24 Wepener 16-05-2005 Naledi U 6 6 17 45 0 44,440.40 0 00 .00 0.00 5,421,800.0 5,421,80 25 Warden 29-11-2005 Phumelela U 116 116 0 18510 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 55,755.0 55,75 26 Three sisters 29-11-2005 Mangaung R 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5.00 Maluti A 27 Harrismith 31-01-2006 Phofung U 279 279 487 3083 0 0 11,923,440.00 0 0 11,923,440.00 28 Wesselsbron 31-01-2006 Lejweleputswa U 130 130 130 1151 0 0 5,790,600.00 0 5,790,600.00 29 Jacobsdal ULC 2006/09/02 Letsemeng U 1 1 205 1240 0 0 8,537,520,00 0 8,537,520,00 Maluti A 30 Zamenloop Exp. 17-04-2006 Phofung R 1 2 1 1 0 0 150,000.00 0 0 150,000,00 31 Marobe Urban 17-04-2006 Matjhabeng U 454 441 435 8179 0 0 19,291,600.00 1,170,000,00 561,600,00 19,291,600,00 32 Trompsburg 19-04-2006 Letsemeng U 1 1 19 25 0 0 44,440,00 3,000,00 1,440,00 44,440,00 Springfontein 390 33 391 2006/12/05 Kopanong U 1 1 1 1 0 0 80,000.00 0 0 80,000,00 34 Kairo (Theronville) 26-06-2006 Dihlabeng U 17 17 75 298 0 0 400,000,00 48,000,00 23,040,00 711,040,00 35 Hennenman ULC 26-06-2006 Matjhabeng U 129 129 402 ? 0 0 3,370,000,00 333,000,00 159,840,00 5,652,840,00 36 Koppie Allen 19-10-2006 Dihlabeng U 1 1 22 85 0 0 2,013,320.00 0 0 2,013,320.00 HD Retief Family Maluti A 37 Claim 28-08-2006 Phofung R 1 1 0 1 0 0 1,150,162.00 0 0 1,150,162.00 Maluti A 38 MJ Retief Claim 25-08-2006 Phofung R 1 1 0 0 0 0 1,252,020.00 0 0 1,252,020.00 Maluti A 39 CJ Retief 2006/06/11 Phofung R 1 1 1 3 0 0 3,309,802.00 0 0 3,309,802.00 40 Adoons N P 2006/12/10 Mohokare U 1 1 6 6 440 54,440,00 0.00 3,000 1,440 54,440,00 41 Mofokeng MK 20-12-2006 Dihlabeng U 1 1 1 1 0 0 40,000.00 0 0 40,000.00 42 Mvundla NN 20-12-2006 Dihlabeng U 1 1 1 4 0 0 40,000.00 0 0 40,000.00 Total 2866 2856 4953 51529 48623 17,244,356.75 81,927,181.18 5,910,000.00 2,386,080.00 88,826,366.16 Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 167

OUTSTANDING RESTITUTION CLAIMS

No. Name of Property No.of No. of Registration District Local Rural Urban Status of Claim Description Claims Prop Division Municipality Municipality Claim 1 Besten J Erf 219 & 220 Bakenpark 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 2 Mofokeng B Lindley 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 1 Research 3 Mopalami CM Roman Str. of Bohlokong 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research Erf 16477&16478 Molawa Motheo Mangaung Research 4 Moroole TA Str. 1 1 1 5 Nhlapo TV Erf 3826 Cnr De Villiers 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 6 Phiritona ULC Erf 368 of Phiritona 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 7 Seboko ML Matlhomola Commonage 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 8 St. Patrick Church Church claim 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 9 Theunissen ULC Grootkau 9 9 Theunissen Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 8 Research 10 Titeli PJ Hasetuka 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 11 Baadjies G Platberg 1 1 Motheo Mantsopa 1 Research 12 Badenhorst AJ Marydale 108 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Gazette 13 Ballot JSS Oldenburg 384 1 3 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Gazette 14 Bolofo ME Schetetedraai 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Setsoto 1 Research Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 15 Boshoff EA Moeder 1276 1 3 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 16 Bouwer CEA Smitsrust 415 1 1 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 17 Coetzee ZJ Ceerust 1420 1 1 1 Dismissal Research & Jacobsdal Xhariep Letsemeng 18 Combrink JP Rietriviernedersetting 1 1 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 19 Cronje PJ Ferdinands Rusts 752 1 2 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 20 De Klerk WJ De Rots 9 1 1 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 21 De Kok SD Ferdinandskraal 386 1 1 1 Dismissal 22 De Villiers JP Von Maltitz 116 1 3 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Gazette

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 168

Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 23 Delport AW Nieuwouddsrust 514 1 2 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 24 Du Plessis JP Annasrus 824 1 3 1 Dismissal Research & Xhariep Letsemeng 25 Du Plooy SJ Badfontein 334 1 3 1 Dismissal 26 Foka KJ Marina Kgorong 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Setsoto 1 Research Research & Xhariep Letsemeng 27 Francisco SJ Jagersfontein 1 1 1 Dismissal 28 Ganda LI Ado farm 65 1 1 Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng 1 Research 29 Geldenhuys JJ Davels Rust 1131 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 30 Grabe DJ Barendina 337 1 5 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 31 Greyling GFH Gilbert 552 1 4 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 32 Grobelaar M Bramleyshoek 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 33 Growther RW Klerksvlei 387 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 34 Growther RW Bramleyshoek 52 1 2 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 35 Hlongwane A Bloeskraal 775 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 1 Research Research & Xhariep Letsemeng 36 Jacobs PJ Sleutelpoort 1044 1 1 1 Dismissal 37 Jansen C Wolwekop 389 1 1 Xhariep Letsemeng 1 Research 38 Jonas Z Belgrano Kafferrivier 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Reearch Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 39 Jooste MJ Ebenhaeser 1419 1 2 1 Dismissal 40 Jordaan AJ Geduld 489 1 3 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 41 Kambule M Ormondo 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 42 Khomari A Newbury's gift 1 1 Motheo Mantsopa 1 Research 43 Khoza JA Ceezban 1672 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 44 Khubeka NB Town lands 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 45 Koalane RA Amou 1 1 Northern Free State Moqhaka 1 Research 46 Koloi SJ Witbankfontein 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 47 Lambrecht J Roberts 1786 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 48 Lebethe PT Lesutho's kraal 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Phumelela 1 Research 49 Leseka N Mazipha 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 50 Louw ASE Vaalbankskuil 1 1 Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng 1 Research &

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 169

Dismissal Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 51 Louw PACP Bloudrif 365 1 1 1 Dismissal 52 Louw V De Kroon 1 1 Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng 1 Research 53 Mahlangu SJ Rooikoppies 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Setsoto 1 Research 54 Mahlatsi TE Erf 72 Ventersburg 1 1 Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng 1 Research 55 Maqalika LJ Van Stadensrus 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 56 Mareletsi M Uitkykplaas 21 21 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 21 Research 57 Martens S Glencoe 2 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research 58 Marumo MS Groenhof/Geluksvlei 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 59 Maselwa GM Winterdam 51 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research 60 Matabola MA Uintjieshoek 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Setsoto 1 Research 61 Mazathunya LM Tafelkop 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Gazette 62 Mazibuko TS Skafita 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 63 Mdluli OJ Voorspoed 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 1 Research Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 64 Meintjies A Helpmekaar 734 1 3 1 Dismissal 65 Mflathela Moroka Institute 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Section 42D 66 Minnie JCS Erf 640 & Erf 220 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 67 Mofokeng MJ Helderfontein 3 3 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 3 Research 69 Mohokare SP Kalane 1 1 Motheo Mantsopa 1 Research 70 Mohulatsi MJ Goedveldt/Versveld farm 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research 71 Moipolai IM Letlhaka 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 72 Mokete KC Tiger River 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 73 Mokgadinyane GM Mooidam 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 74 Mokgema AM Liverpool 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 75 Mokhachane SW Prinsrus 763 1 1 Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng 1 Research 76 Mokhethoa MK Tidimane 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 77 Mokhorong SM Theuniskraal 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research 78 Mokhutle ZM Zoar Mission Station 1236 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Negotiations 79 Mokoena J Reshoek 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Phumelela 1 Research 80 Moleleki RJ Platkop 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Setsoto 1 Research 81 Mollet PI Vragpaar, Boesmanskop 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 170

82 Mollo J Bergview complex 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 83 Moloabi A Ratlou site 148 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 84 Moloi M Ratau 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 85 Moloi PD Cornelia Small Holding 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Phumelela 1 Research 86 Monoko A Vegkopberg 1 1 Northern Free State Metsimaholo 1 Research 87 Morajane FS Goodhope farm 5 5 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 5 Research 88 Moroane S Modutung family claim 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Section 42D 89 Mosia LA Moederieng Clarens 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 90 Mosia MA Tsokung 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 91 Motaung B Holhoek 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 92 Motaung R Witkrans 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 93 Motaung TS Vlakspruit 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Phumelela 1 Research 94 Mothokho MJ Altona 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 95 Mototo S De Hoek 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 96 Motsalane M Seliba village trust 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Section 42D 97 Motsetse SP Modderport 1 1 Motheo Mantsopa 1 Research 98 Mpholo P Hetloo 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 99 Mpholo TJ Andre Dundee 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 100 Mthimkulu J Dankpaar 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 1 Research 101 Mthimkulu J Petrus Steyn, Lindley 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 1 Research 102 Nako KJ Motlhanapitse farm 1 1 Lejweleputswa Tologo 1 Research 103 Naude J Toekomst 1041 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 104 Ngakantsi EM Toba 112 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 105 Nhlapo LJ Mahlabathini 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 106 Nieuwoudt T Boschplat 1312 1 4 1 Dismissal 107 Nkala PM Brindisi farm 3 3 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 3 Research 108 Nomga NV Hilton 1 1 Lejweleputswa Matjhabeng 1 Research 109 Nyokong MU Maseru 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 110 Oberholzer H Waaifontein 1406 1 1 1 Dismissal Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 111 Otto JH Dampoort 448 1 1 1 Dismissal

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 171

Research & Xhariep Mohokare 112 Phoshuli SJ Phosholishoek 1 1 1 Dismissal 113 Phumo A Cronje'sdrift 1 1 Northern Free State Moqhaka 1 Research Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 114 Pienaar H Wegdraai 97 1 1 1 Dismissal 115 Potgieter J Jakkalskraal 1 1 Theunissen Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research Research & Theunissen Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 116 Potgieter JC Laastelag 1 1 1 Dismissal 117 Pula SS Ramahutshe 47 1 1 Thaba Nchu Motheo Mangaung 1 Awaiting approval 118 Qwa-Qwa claims Qwa-Qwa Rural Claims 20 20 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 20 Research 119 Raadt FJ Springfontein Mission 1 1 Xhariep Kopanong 1 Research 120 Radebe MZ Witbankfontein 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 121 Ramosoeu PA Moroka's / Groot hoek 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Section 42D 122 Sebetloane TG Groenheuwel 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 123 Segalo BM Wasbank 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research 124 Seleke DM Schoolserd plot 1 1 Lejweleputswa Masilonyana 1 Research 125 Selepe AT Thaba-Ntsu 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 126 Selepe J Town lands 8131 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Phumelela 1 Research 127 Senakgomo PJ Dihekeng / Rooibult 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 128 Shibana MP Redsdaal farm of Zastron 1 1 Xhariep Mohokare 1 Research 129 Shinners MM Eastern fringes of Parys 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research 130 Sithole LE Hesterdeel 1 1 Northern Free State Mafube 1 Research 131 Snyman W N/A 1 1 Bethlehem Thabo Mofutsanyana Dihlabeng 1 Research 132 Sompane P Mooidry poortee 1 1 Northern Free State Moqhaka 1 Research Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 133 Stadtlander SJG Clerkstroom 297 1 1 1 Dismissal Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 134 Strydom JFS De Aar 459 1 1 1 Dismissal 135 Theletsane J Steynsrus 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Nketoana 1 Research 136 Tladi I Bosjespruit 697 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 137 Tlali KE Grootdam 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Setsoto 1 Research 138 Van Der Schyff IJ Leeuwspruit 1 1 Northern Free State Ngwathe 1 Research Research & Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 139 Van Graan CR Ellasrust 1293 1 2 1 Dismissal 140 Van Reenen J Willeminah plaas 1 1 Thabo Mofutsanyana Phumelela 1 Research

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 172

141 Van Wyk F Frisgewaagt 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 142 Van Wyk GR Osfontein 1 1 Bethulie Xhariep Letsemeng 1 Research Research & Xhariep Kopanong 143 Van Wyk J (Korana) Bethany 16 1 1 1 Dismissal 144 Venter EA Ontvrede 1466 1 4 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research 145 Versfeld F Constantia of Kroonstad 1 1 Northern Free State Moqhaka 1 Research Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 146 Victor JFO Deaphne 102 1 2 1 Dismissal Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 147 Viljoen H Clerkstroom 297, Ptn 1 1 1 1 Dismissal 148 Viljoen HJ Uitsig 1042, Ardtully 1876 1 2 Thabo Mofutsanyana Maluti-a-Phofung 1 Research Research & Hoopstad Lejweleputswa Tswelopele 149 Wessels WJ Leegte 306 (Re of Ptn 1) 1 1 1 Dismissal 150 Xengana KE Middel Erf 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research 151 Xhalabile GJ Nama-Bafutsana 1 1 Motheo Mangaung 1 Research Total 208 239 191 17 Source: Department of Land Affairs

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 173

6. ANNEXURES

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 174

ANNEXURE A: GENERAL MAPS

1. Location of towns and administrative districts

2. Free State soil types

3. Free State average annual rainfall

4. Free State average maximum daily temperature

5. Free State average minimum daily temperature

6. Free State agriculture

7. Free State topography

8. Free State vegetation

9. Free State surface water

10.Free State mineral deposits

11.Free State schools

12.Free State sensitive localities

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007

184

ANNEXURE B: REVIEWED FSGDS (2006) MAPS ACCORDING TO NSDP PRINCIPLES

1. Innovation and experimentation areas in the Free State, 2006

2. Areas of high value differentiated goods in the Free State, 2006

3. Areas of labour intensive mass produced goods in the Free State, 2006

4. Areas for public services and administration in the Free State, 2006

5. Areas of retail and private services in the Free State, 2006

6. Areas of tourism potential in the Free State, 2006

7. Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006

8. Areas with development need in the Free State, 2006

9. Development potential and need per settlement in the Free State, 2006

10. Development nodes according to the national spatial development perspective classification

11. Free State possible investment beyond basic services by Government.

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 195

ANNEXURE C: ANALYSIS MAPS

1. Unemployment

2. Poverty

3. Educational: no schooling

4. Educational: limited schooling up to grade 5

5. Traditional dwellings

6. Informal dwellings

7. Traditional and informal dwellings

8. No piped water

9. Water from community stands greater than 200m from the yard

10. No piped water and community stands greater than 200m from the yard

11. Households without sewerage

12. Households with pit and bucket latrines

13. Households with pit and bucket latrines and without sanitation

14. No access to electricity for lighting

15. No access to refuse removal

16. No access to telephone facilities

17. Free State population distribution (0-6 years)

18. Free State population distribution (7-18 years)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007 196

19. Free State population distribution (19-65 years)

20. Free State population distribution (over 65 years)

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007

216

ANNEXURE D: PROPOSED SPATIAL INITIATIVES MAPS

1. Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Economic Development

2. Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Tourism

3. Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Environment

4. Provincial Spatial Development Framework 2007: Agriculture and Mining

Final Draft Free State Spatial Development Framework 2007