DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Basic Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Basic Assessment Report Draft Basic Assessment Report BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT KROONSTAD FARMER PRODUCTION SUPPORT UNIT FEZILE DABI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, FREESTATE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA Prepared By: Environmental Management Group P.O. Box 28242, Danhof, 9310 June 2018 Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, promulgated in terms of the National EnvironmentalPrepared Management For: Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (For official use only) 1 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT DESTEA Ref No: NEAS Ref No: Application Number: Date Received: Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. 2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report. 4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations. 6. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority. 7. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. 8. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner. 9. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process. 10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed. 2 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this YES NO section? If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for appointment of a specialist for each specialist thus appointed: Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D. 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail1: Environmental Management Group has been appointed by SMEC South Africa for the Department: Rural Development and Land Reform to conduct the Basic Assessment application of the Kroonstad Farmer Production Support Unit (FPSU). The FPSU is a rural outreach unit connected with the Agri-Hub. It focusses on primary collection, storage, processing, and extension services including mechanization. The proposed Kroonstad FPSU will consist of the following: • Security offices • Reception and admin offices & Multi-purpose training centre • Retail space and tourism facility • Storage units / facilities for mobile units (include a cold storage) • Multi-purpose animal handling facilities for training • Multi-purpose animal handling – buildings • Logistic centre with training and workshop • Feed store/ Pack House • 500 Cattle feedlot The main concept of the Kroonstad FPSU is to provide essential and efficient farmer support services and training to developing farmers in the Moqhaka Local Municipal area. These support and training services will focus on the agricultural commodities and input requirements identified in the farmer needs assessment and is also based on the main commodities identified in the Fezile Dabi Agri-Park Master Business Plan, which is red meat, poultry (chicken), and maize. The FPSU will also incorporate private sector businesses, forums, union, and other stakeholders to assist with training and the provision of support services. The FPSU envision to provide the following key elements in terms of support to the local farmers: • Information Services • Input support • Mechanisation Support • Facilities 1 Please note that this description should not be a verbatim repetition of the listed activity as contained in the relevant Government Notice, but should be a brief description of activities to be undertaken as per the project description. 3 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT • Training • Market intelligence The FPSU is set to be located within Kroonstad within the Moqhaka Local Municipality of the Fezile Dabi District Municipality. The FPSU site is located on the right-hand side of the R76 provincial road, approximately 5 km north-west of the Kroonstad Central Business District. The location of the FPSU site was chosen for its proximity to the commonage and smallholder farmers in the region. The distance from the Kroonstad FPSU to the Parys Agri- Hub is approximately 98 km when driving from the R721 provincial road. The proposed site has a relatively flat topography. The site was used for agricultural activities, such as grazing and dryland farming. There are no existing buildings on the site and some areas are fenced with a stock fence, installed by the neighbouring owners. There are other small holdings with resident buildings surrounding the proposed site. There is no water supply dedicated to the proposed FPSU site, however there is Municipal water supply pipeline that service the community in Meadows and currently there is no existing bulk water sewer line, and electricity point dedicated on site. The proposed layout falls within close proximity to wetland areas. Relevant specialists were consulted to conclude the status of the wetlands. The wetlands were also delineated to avoid any construction inside the wetlands. The proposed site in The Meadows Small Holding is currently leased from the department by the local farmers. The cattle feedlot will start off as a 200 unit feedlot and expand to a 500 unit feedlot. The mortality rate is estimated to be below 3%. All mortalities will be supplied to surrounding game farm owners as feed for their predators. The waste of the feedlot is to be collected from the holding pens and drained into the retention pond. The retention pond consists of 2 dams lined with impenetrable layers. Effluent will be collected into the first dam where solid waste will sink to the bottom and grey water will flow over into the second pond. This grey water will be used for irrigation purposes on surrounding rangelands. Once the first dam full of solid waste, it will be cleaned and sold to nurseries as compost. The first dam will only be full after approximately 10 years. The dry manure will be stockpiled at the manure stockpile section, which will be lined and covered to prevent flies from breeding in the stockpile. The manure will be sold to local farmers and nurseries as garden compost. The feedlot will be cleaned on a monthly basis to prevent dust, smell and manure form accumulating in the holding pens. The secondary wetlands situated in close proximity will be clearly demarcated to prevent heavy machinery form entering the wetland areas. It will also be maintained form alien invasive encroachment throughout the lifespan of the project. 2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES “alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to— (a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; 4 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT (c) the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity. Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent. Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative. 5 BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT 3. ACTIVITY POSITION Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. List alternative sites, if applicable. Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative: Alternative S12 (preferred
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Year End Results: Sens Release and Commentary
    Raubex Group Limited (Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa) Registration number 2006/023666/06 Share Code: RBX ISIN Code: ZAE000093183 (“Raubex” or the “Group”) AUDITED RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Revenues up 94,9% to R4,16bn (2008: R2,14bn) Operating profit up 84,2% to R794,6m (2008: R431,3m) Group operating margin of 19,1% (2008: 20,2%) HEPS up 62% to 291,7 cents per share (2008: 180,1 cents per share) Strong cash flow from operations up 114,9% to R964,4m (2008: R448,8m) Capex spend of R382,8m (2008: R244,6m) Solid order book of R5,2bn (2008: R2,7bn) Final dividend of 70 cents per share declared Francois Diedrechsen, Financial and Commercial Director of Raubex Group, said: “Despite difficult global market conditions, the year under review saw the Group deliver yet another solid operational and financial performance in line with expectations. The acquisitions incorporated during the past year are performing well and have added significantly to our capacity and skills set. The benefits of the government’s infrastructure spend have now filtered through to the bottom line as demonstrated by our growing order book and the continued healthy demand for our services. Large contract wins locally and abroad, including two new significant contracts in Namibia, is a very positive development for Raubex and we will continue to carefully position the Group as a major player in SADC geographies meeting our investment criteria. We are confident that our healthy financial position, extended footprint and cost conscious approach will allow the Group to maintain its strong performance in the medium-term.” 18 May 2009 ENQUIRIES Raubex Group +27 (0) 12 665 3226 Francois Diedrechsen College Hill +27 (0) 11 447 3030 Frédéric Cornet +27 (0) 83 307 8286 Hayley Crane +27 (0) 82 815 1821 COMMENTARY FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Revenue increased 94,9% to R4,16 billion and operating profit increased 84,2% to R794,6 million from the corresponding prior period.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 2010 Spatial Development Framework
    1 Nketoana Spatial Development Framework (Nketoana SDF) 2009-2010 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBERS Preface (Mayor) 8 Preface (Municipal Manager) 8 Technical Team 9 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Methodology 10 1.2 The Study Area 10 1.3 Purpose of the SDF 10 1.4 Structure of the SDF 10 1.5 Level of Detail 10 1.6 Objectives of the SDF 10 SECTION 2: NKETOANA IN THE REGION 2.1. National Spatial Development Perspective 12 2.2. Revised Free State Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (FSGDS) 12 2.3. Thabo Mofutsanyana District SDF 12 SECTION 3: SECTORAL ALIGNMENT PROPOSALS 3.1. Integrated Development Plan 15 SECTION 4: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS 4.1. Socio Economic Analysis 23 4.1.1. Demographic analysis 23 4.1.1.1. Population 23 4.1.1.2. Gender Distribution 23 4.1.1.3. Age Distribution 24 4.1.1.4. Labour Sector 24 3 4.1.1.5. Income Distribution 24 4.1.1.6. Job creation and local economic development 24 4.1.2. Urban Environments 25 4.1.2.1. Land use and settlement pattern 25 4.1.2.2. Transportation Infrastructure 30 4.1.2.3. Engineering Infrastructure 32 4.1.2.4. Housing 36 4.1.2.4.1. Reitz-Petsana 37 4.1.2.4.2. Petrus Steyn-Mamfubedu 37 4.1.2.4.3. Arlington-Leratswana 37 4.1.2.4.4. Lindley-Ntha 38 4.1.3. Rural Environments 38 4.1.3.1. Activities 38 4.1.3.2. Infrastructure 39 4.1.3.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaal River System : Overarching Internal Strategic Perspective
    ISP: VAAL RIVER SYSTEM OVERARCHING Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Directorate National Water Resource Planning INTERNAL STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE FOR THE VAAL RIVER SYSTEM OVERARCHING (WMAs No 8, 9 & 10) Title: Internal Strategic Perspective for the Vaal River System Overarching DWAF Report No: P RSA C000/00/0103 Consultants: PDNA, WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, WMB and Kwezi-V3 Status of Report: Version 1 Version Controller: Ms T Malaka (From Central Cluster) Date: March 2004 Approved for Consultants by: DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Directorate National Water Resource Planning Approved for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry by: REPORT NUMBER: P RSA C000/00/0103 I ISP: VAAL RIVER SYSTEM OVERARCHING REFERENCE This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. 2004. Internal Strategic Perspective: Vaal River System Overarching. Prepared by PDNA, WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, WMB and Kwezi-V3 on behalf of the Directorate: National Water Resource Planning. DWAF Report No P RSA C000/00/0103 INVITATION TO COMMENT This report will be updated on a regular basis until it is eventually superseded by the Catchment Management Strategies of the three Vaal WMAs. Water users and other stakeholders in the Upper, Middle and Lower Vaal WMAs and other areas are encouraged to study this report and to submit any comments they may have to the Version Controller (see box overleaf). ELECTRONIC VERSION This report is also available in electronic format as follows:
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Overview
    Cultural Guiding Free State Course 1 Module # 1 – Component # 1 Provincial Overview Introduction The Free State is known as South Africa's ‘breadbasket’ or ‘granary of the country’ and more than 30,000 farms produces over 70% of the country's grain. The province also boasts, among others productive gold and diamond mines, majestic sandstone mountains and archaeological and paleontological treasures. To the local rugby supporter this is ‘Cheetah country’! The landscape is characterised by the grassy plains of South Africa’s interior plateau. This is South Africa’s geographical heart, caught up between the Vaal and Orange Rivers. It is landlocked by KwaZulu Natal, Mpumalanga, Gauteng, North West, the Eastern Cape and Northern Cape. The neighbouring Lesotho fits in the hollow of the province’s bean- like shape. The current borders date from 1994 when the Bantustans were abolished and included into the provinces of South Africa. It is the only Province of the former provinces of South Africa which did not undergo border changes (excluding the incorporation of the Qwa-Qwa Bantustan). The Republic of the Orange Free State (Afrikaans: Oranje-Vrystaat; Dutch: Oranje- Vrijstaat) was an independent Boer republic in southern Africa during the second half of the 19th century. After the Second Anglo Boer War (Great South African War) it was a British colony for a short period, until 1910 when it became one of the four provinces of the Union of South Africa. In 1995, it became known as the Free State Province, one of the nine provinces of South Africa under the new dispensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE SONETTE SMIT 8 RENDEZVOUS STREET HELDERVUE SOMERSET WEST 7129 TEL: 021 8512673 (w) CELL: 084 5855706 E- MAIL: [email protected] EMPLOYMENT HISTORY May 2012 – present Greenmined Environmental Managing Director and Environmental Consultant My duties consist of: Management of company and team of consultants, Liaising with clients Compilation of Environmental Management Programs, Environmental Impact Assessments (Basic Assessments and Full EIA’s) Compliance Monitoring ECO Monitoring GIS – Drawing locality and site maps for applications using planet GIS. Responsible for the public participation processes during projects Applications for mining authorization, water use authorizations and waste disposal permits. Liaise with authorities Water Use Authorizations Water use license processes including the following: Consultation with applicants Managing water use applications Compiling Waste Water Management Plans Training of new employees June 2009 – April 2012 Enviroworks Environmental Consultants Environmental Practitioner My duties consist of: Management of Cape Town Branch including all management duties involved. Liaising with clients Compilation of Environmental Management Programs Environmental Impact Assessments (Basic Assessments and Full EIA’s) Compliance Monitoring ECO Monitoring GIS – Drawing locality and site maps for applications using planet GIS. Responsible for the public participation processes during projects Applications for mining authorization, water use authorizations and waste disposal permits.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Wastewater Treatment Status, July 2009
    MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT BASE INFORMATION FOR TARGETED RISK – BASED REGULATION FREE STATE PROVINCE STATUS AT JULY 2009 FREE STATE INDEX A. Context 3 B. Purpose of Report: Risk-Based Assessment 4 C. Overview of the Free State Wastewater Treatment Works 5 D. Licensing Status of Wastewater Treatment Works in the Free State 8 E. Receiving Plans Vs Design Capacity 11 F. WSA / WSP Arrangements, Technology used and Compliance Standards 17 G. Effluent Quality Non-Compliance Trends 21 H. Technical Skills Gap Analysis 30 I. Weighted Prioritisation of Potentially High Risk WWTW 42 J. Conclusions and Recommendations 47 All assessment data and information reflected in the Risk Based Assessments, its Executive Summaries and electronic data sheets are property of the Department of Water Affairs. It has been developed- and paid for under the national Wastewater Regulatory Programme 2008/09 (DWA Water Services Regulations). It is illegal to sell this material for profit. Would the material be reproduced or quoted, DWA should be acknowledged and referenced. Page 2 of 55 Page 3 of 55 A. CONTEXT South Africa has build a substantial wastewater management industry that comprises of approximately 9 70 treatment plants, extensive pipe networks, and pump stations, transporting and treating an average of 7 589 000 kilolitres of wastewater on a daily basis. The country runs a prominent wastewater treatment business with capital replacement value of >R 23 billion and operational expenditure of >R 3.5 b per annum. Frost and Sullivan (2006) estimate the value of the RSA water and wastewater treatment equipment market at US$ 135m, with growth at 3.8%.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Management and Geo-Hydrological Aspects Of
    Municipal management and geo-hydrological aspects of importance in the potable water supply of Lindley EJ NEALER1 AND WE BERTRAM2 Abstract When the South African Government in 1998 re-demarcated its 283 municipalities so that they completely cover the country in a “wall-to-wall” manner, their main focus was on growing local economies and maintaining the provision of an increased number of diverse and more complex basic municipal services to new geographical areas consisting of millions of citizens who might previously had been neglected. In most of the instances the newly established and merged municipalities were demarcated according to geographical aspects inherited from the previous political dispensation, historical municipal areas and magisterial district farm names. The fact that these municipal government jurisdictions for the purpose of improving co-operative municipal- and integrated water resources management (IWRM), in most instances do not correspond with environmental and physical land features such as the demarcated surface water (rivers) drainage regions’ boundaries, could lead to the ineffective, inefficient and non-economic municipal management of water, sanitation and environmental services. The aforementioned is a case with reference to water services management in the Free State Province town of Lindley located in the Vals River catchment and the Nketoana Local Municipality’s area of jurisdiction. An extensive literature review, the use and study of geographic tools such as maps, ortho- photos and information data bases, as well as two field visits to the area, enabled the researchers to identify the essential geographical, geo-hydrological and municipal management aspects of importance for the potable water service providers and managers in the Lindley municipal area.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface and Groundwater Resources
    Orange-Senqu River Basin Orange-Senqu River Commission Secretariat Governments of Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and South Africa UNDP-GEF Orange-Senqu Strategic Action Programme (Atlas Project ID 71598) Surface and Groundwater Resources Contribution to the Final Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and Built Structures Database for the Orange-Senqu Basin Technical Report 20 Rev 0, 7 December 2011 UNDP-GEF Orange-Senqu Strategic Action Programme Capacity Development Activities UNDP-GEF Orange-Senqu Strategic Action Programme Surface and Groundwater Resources This report has been submitted by Allan Bailey ([email protected]), utilising previous research on the subject, including previous work of ORASECOM and its ICP supported projects. This detailed report is a background document to the Transboundray Diagnostic Analysis Report. This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 0 Final standalone (detailed) report 07 Dec 2011 AB Project executed by: Surface and Groundwater Resources Contribution to Final Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and Built Structures Database for the Orange-Senqu Basin FINAL STANDALONE (DETAILED) REPORT December 2011 Submitted by: SSI Engineers and Environmental Consultants Executive Summary The Orange-Senqu Basin (hereafter referred to as the Basin) covers a large part of South Africa, the whole of Lesotho and parts of Namibia and Botswana. It is the most important basin in South Africa and Lesotho. The rivers in the Basin are a source of water for agriculture, domestic use in towns and settlements, industry, mining, energy, recreation and tourism. In South Africa the Basin includes the Vaal and Orange rivers which form a major part of the water resources and water infrastructure in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Audited Results for the Year Ended 28 February 2009
    Audited Results for the year ended 28 February 2009 Highlights • Revenues up 94,9% to R4,16 billion (2008: R2,14 billion) • Operating profit up 84,2% to R794,6 million (2008: R431,3 million) • Group operating margin of 19,1% (2008: 20,2%) • HEPS up 62% to 291,7 cents per share (2008: 180,1 cents per share) • Strong cash flow from operations up 114,9% to R964,4 million (2008: R448,8 million) • Capex spend of R382,8 million (2008: R244,6 million) • Solid order book of R5,2 billion (2008: R2,7 billion) • Final dividend of 70 cents per share declared AUDITED GROUP INCOME STATEMENT AUDITED GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS Acquisitions Audited Audited Audited Audited The following acquisitions became effective after the balance sheet date. 28 February 29 February 28 February 29 February Anchor Park Investments 71 (Pty) Limited 2009 2008 2009 2008 The group acquired 100% of the share capital of Anchor Park Investments 71 (Pty) Limited for R35 million cash. The company owns a Pilatus PC12 aircraft and will provide flight services to the Group. R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 Revenue 4 162 780 2 135 778 Cash flows from operating activities Francois Diedrechsen, Financial and Commercial Director of Raubex Group, said: “Despite difficult global Cost of sales (3 148 561) (1 616 112) Cash generated from operations 964 405 448 815 market conditions, the year under review saw the Group deliver yet another solid operational and financial Interest received 42 630 12 997 performance in line with expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Development Framework
    REVIEWED SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IN TERMS OF SECTION 34 OF THE MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS ACT, 2000 (ACT 32 OF 2000), SECTION 20(3)(A) OF THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT ACT, ACT 16 OF 2013 AND SECTION 4(2) OF THE MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY LAND USE PLANNING BY-LAWS, NOVEMBER 2015 December 2018 Prepared by the IDP Steering Committee of the Moqhaka Local Municipality & L M V TOWN PLANNERS (056) 215 2260 (056) 212 3381 CONTENTS PART A I. GLOSSARY II. APPROVAL III. ALIGNED PROJECTS IV. ALIGNMENT MEASURES PART B 1. INTRODUCTION 32 2. LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT AND CONSULTATION PROCESS 36 2.1 Legislative Context 2.1.1 Historical Course of Legislation and Guidelines 2.1.2 The Municipal Systems Act 2.1.3 The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 2.2 Guidelines 2.3 Participation Structure 2.4 Methodology 2.4.1 Implementation 2.4.2 Critical Milestones and Deliverables 2 3. ISSUES, VISION & DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES 44 3.1 Community and Stakeholder Analysis 3.2 Integrated Development Plan Vision and Mission Statement 3.3 Spatial Vision and Spatial Development Goals 3.3.1 Long-term Spatial Vision 3.3.2 Spatial Development Vision 3.3.3 Spatial Development Goals 3.4 Conduction of Public Consultative Processes 4. STATUS QUO: SOCIO ECONOMIC 50 4.1 Demographic Realities 4.2 Regional Gender and Age Distribution 4.3 Local Economic Development 4.3.1 Current Development Initiatives 4.3.2 Regional Economic Tendencies 4.3.3 Long-Term Economic Prospects 4.3.4 Unemployment and Economic Difficulties 4.3.5 Influencing Factors PART C: SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of South African Place Names
    DICTIONARY OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PLACE NAMES P E Raper Head, Onomastic Research Centre, HSRC CONTENTS Preface Abbreviations ix Introduction 1. Standardization of place names 1.1 Background 1.2 International standardization 1.3 National standardization 1.3.1 The National Place Names Committee 1.3.2 Principles and guidelines 1.3.2.1 General suggestions 1.3.2.2 Spelling and form A Afrikaans place names B Dutch place names C English place names D Dual forms E Khoekhoen place names F Place names from African languages 2. Structure of place names 3. Meanings of place names 3.1 Conceptual, descriptive or lexical meaning 3.2 Grammatical meaning 3.3 Connotative or pragmatic meaning 4. Reference of place names 5. Syntax of place names Dictionary Place Names Bibliography PREFACE Onomastics, or the study of names, has of late been enjoying a greater measure of attention all over the world. Nearly fifty years ago the International Committee of Onomastic Sciences (ICOS) came into being. This body has held fifteen triennial international congresses to date, the most recent being in Leipzig in 1984. With its headquarters in Louvain, Belgium, it publishes a bibliographical and information periodical, Onoma, an indispensable aid to researchers. Since 1967 the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN) has provided for co-ordination and liaison between countries to further the standardization of geographical names. To date eleven working sessions and four international conferences have been held. In most countries of the world there are institutes and centres for onomastic research, official bodies for the national standardization of place names, and names societies.
    [Show full text]