DOCSLIB.ORG

Chester: Questions 1 to 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chester: Questions 1 to 7 Chester: Questions 1 to 7 CH1 – Chester settlement area Question 1 – Do you agree with this approach? If you do not agree please say why and explain what alternative approach should be followed ID Summary of issue raised Council response 23, 47, 157, General support for policy No change to policy required 186, 215, 1271, 658, 1135, 1152, 1356 23 Use alpha / numeric bullet points for ease of use Bullet points have been used in this policy because the criteria are not listed in order of importance, and should be read alongside one another rather than in an order of preference. No change to policy required. 23 The Millennium Greenway should be included as a green corridor Policy has been amended to reference green spaces and corridors more generally. The policies map will identify strategic open spaces which relate to additional policies in the draft plan. 157 Key priorities should be: The key priorities and overarching strategy for development is set • ensuring there is a good integrated transport plan; out in the adopted Local Plan (Part One). • encouraging social mix of affordable housing No change to policy required • protecting heritage • protection and development of waterways • cultural attractions 186 Reference to historic routes and grain needs greater clarity between Bullet point has been amended as suggested, to provide clarity on protection and reinstatement the protection and reinstatement of historic routes and grain. 215 Support the boundary which includes land at Clifton Drive, Chester Comments noted. No change to policy required. 216, 2568 Plan contains no policy relating to allocations / safeguarded land for There are no additional land allocations proposed in the Chester residential development in Chester (mirror policy of CH2 for spatial area as set out in the Land Allocations Background Paper employment). This is needed for clarity and to ensure housing needs of (June 2017). The housing requirement in policy STRAT 3 of the the city can be met. Local Plan (Part One) can be achieved through the delivery of housing commitments and the delivery of the strategic site at Wrexham Road. The background paper provides the evidence CH1 – Chester settlement area Question 1 – Do you agree with this approach? If you do not agree please say why and explain what alternative approach should be followed ID Summary of issue raised Council response base and justification for not including an additional land allocations policy for Chester. 702, 1956, Insufficient weight is given to the unique natural and historic character The Local Plan (Part Two) should be read alongside the Part One 1965 of Chester. Policy should reiterate phrase used by Inspector in the Local plan, and where possible should not repeat information. Plan (Part One) The importance of Chester’s unique character is also reiterated in policies CH5 to CH7. 1271 Strongly support policy, in particular with regards to development along Comments noted. No change to policy required. inner ring road. 658, 1552 Requirement for Chester Western Relief Road / land should be Comments noted. Policies T1 and T2 of the draft Plan provide safeguarded for the route. further detail in relation to transport proposals in the borough. 820, 1483, Archaeology is a matter of public interest and proposals for buildings Consultation on individual planning proposals / applications is 1484, 1587 such as Dee House require full consultation. carried out through the development management process and Proposals for Dee House are not supported. as such, is not a policy requirement. In July 2016, final submissions for the re-development of Dee House were received from developers and evaluated. A preferred bidder was selected and that decision approved to enter into a Development Agreement. The decision was called in by Scrutiny Committee in September 2016, who made no further recommendations, allowing the Cabinet’s original decision to proceed. No change to policy required. 820 Planning applications for new build should include: The draft plan includes policies in relation to energy conservation, • energy conservation – solar panels for all new homes; house building requirements and development impacts with • fire sprinklers in all new homes regards to amenity and design. • offer lifetime homes suitable for older people No change to policy required. 848 New buildings should be in-keeping with the locality and development The proposed policy and boundary for Chester retains the extent of any green belt land should not be allowed. Boundary changes may of the North Cheshire Green Belt as set out in the Local Plan (Part affect a Churches parish which may cause local impacts. One). The policy protects the local character, environment, heritage and culture of the City. No change to policy required. 1135, 2205 Protection of River Dee and Shropshire Union Canal should be extended Policy has been amended to include a broader reference to CH1 – Chester settlement area Question 1 – Do you agree with this approach? If you do not agree please say why and explain what alternative approach should be followed ID Summary of issue raised Council response to remaining open spaces adjacent to canal east of the city, and refer to protect the nature, quality and scale of strategic open space other waterways corridors corridors. Strategic open spaces are those identified on the policies map, and supported by the evidence base. 1356, 1520 Concerns about Wrexham Road allocation (traffic impacts; mix and type The location of the Wrexham Road strategic site for the delivery of housing) of approximately 1300 homes was set in the Local Plan (Part One). Policy CH1 requires a comprehensive approach to the development of this site, and any proposals will be required to take account of all other relevant policies including housing mix and type, and traffic and transport assessments 1411 Access too Roodee is gated off during race days. They should be open Comments noted. This is not a planning policy issue. so that everyone can access it. No change to policy required. 1587 Boughton Gateway is extremely poor. Hopeful that policy will ensure Comments noted. No change to policy required. enhanced frontages. 1956, 1965 Approach does not recognise the limits of Chester to absorb high level The Local Plan (Part Two) should be read alongside the Part One of developments without damaging special character and qualities. plan, and should not repeat adopted policy. The importance of Emphasise and reinstate policy from STRAT 3. Chester and its unique character is emphasised throughout the plan and specifically in polices CH1 to CH7. 1995, 2167 Additional wording should be added in relation to Wrexham Road The Local Plan (Part One) sets out the broad requirements for development to: development of the strategic sites at Wrexham Road, which • provide a wide range of house types including bungalows includes the drafting of a development brief for the • provide community centre, sports facilities, and health centre comprehensive development of the site. • make land available for self-build properties The Local Plan (Part Two) should not repeat policy from the Part One plan and therefore the bullet point has been deleted. Additional development management policies relating to housing mix and type will be applicable to proposals for residential development. 2267 Bullet point relating to Wrexham Road should be deleted The Local Plan (Part One) sets out the broad requirements for development of the strategic sites at Wrexham Road, which includes the drafting of a development brief for the comprehensive development of the site. CH1 – Chester settlement area Question 1 – Do you agree with this approach? If you do not agree please say why and explain what alternative approach should be followed ID Summary of issue raised Council response The Local Plan (Part Two) should not repeat policy from the Part One plan and therefore the bullet point has been deleted. 2368 Development adjacent to waterways should be of high quality and The policy has been amended to provide reference to the canal provide active frontages corridors, and paragraph 2.3 of the explanation sets out additional details in respect of high quality development. 2568, 2654 No additional safeguarded land / allocated land has been identified for The spatial strategy, including quantum of housing and future development to ensure permanence of Green Belt. employment land required to 2030 was set in the Local Plan (Part One). The accompanying background papers and evidence base documents provided the information to support the delivery of the plan which included the identification of sufficient deliverable land to meet the housing requirement. No change to policy required. 2600 It is unclear what area of land is protected in relation to Dukes Drive. The strategic open spaces and green corridors are to be identified on the policies map and references to the maps has been added in the relevant policies and explanatory text. Policy CH2 – Employment land provision in Chester Question 2: Do you agree with this approach? If you do not agree please say why and explain what alternative approach should be followed. ID Summary of consultation comment received Council response 2097 Historic England – there needs to be a robust assessment of all the sites The assessments in the HELAA identify where there are where they affect a heritage asset including its setting. Further development constraints on site, including historic assets. The guidance is provided. The SA makes an assumption of the impact HELAA identifies further assessment of these sites may be without undertaking a heritage impact assessment, taking account of required in line with Heritage England Advice. primary legislation and NPPF. Allocation of sites for development may A Heritage Impact Assessment has been undertaken on the present better opportunities for the historic environment. potential sites carried forward for assessment from the HELAA. This has been used to inform the site assessments in the Land Allocations Background Paper (2017).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 Will Take Beeston
    The Venue The 52 does not go from the City Centre but does pass through Clifton, QMC, University and then The Midlands Viking Symposium 2008 will take Beeston. More information is available on the place on the University Park Campus in the Arts Nottingham City Transport website: www.nctx.co.uk/Area%20Guide/Universities.htm Lecture Theatre near the South Entrance, no 34 on the map: www.nottingham.ac.uk/about/ By Taxi: There are taxi ranks throughout the City campuses/documents/up-map.pdf Centre and immediately adjacent to the main railway and bus stations. The journey to the campus takes about 15 minutes. Reaching us: From Beeston From Nottingham (approximately 1.5 miles) (approximately 3 miles) Midlands Viking The Rainbow 5 Trent Barton service runs from Symposium 2008 By Bus: From Broadmarsh Bus Station (about 250 Beeston Bus Station (about 10 minutes walk from metres walk from the Railway Station), catch one of the Railway Station along Station Road) past the the following Trent Barton buses: South and North entrances to the University, as well Viking Ways: as passing QMC. Nottingham City Transport service University Boulevard: Rainbow 5 13 has a stop in Queen's Road, about 5 minutes Bones to Berserks East, South and West Entrances: 18, 32 walk from the Beeston railway station, turning right out of Station Road. More information can be found on the Trent Barton University of Nottingham th website: www.trentbarton.co.uk/university/index.html From East Midlands Airport Saturday 26 April 2008, 10 a.m. (approximately 10 miles) The Nottingham City Transport Unilink service (34) also runs from the Broadmarsh Centre via Angel From East Midlands Airport you can take Trent and Row, Derby Road and QMC and stops at various Barton Bus 5b, or the Nottingham City Bus Runway points on the campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham to Let 25% Sold Or > 18 New Industrial/Warehouse Units Under Offer > 2,644 - 36,339 Sq Ft > Available Now
    For sale/ Nottingham To let 25% sold or > 18 new industrial/warehouse units under offer > 2,644 - 36,339 sq ft > Available now www.trentgateway.co.uk MIDLAND MAIN LINE TECHNOLOGY DRIVE MIDLAND MAIN LINE SEE ELO FOR CONTINUATION TECHNOLOGY DRIVE MIDLAND MAIN LINE SEE ELO FOR CONTINUATION TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SEE ELO FOR 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTINUATION 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 13 SEE ELO FOR 11 10 9 CONTINUATION8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 14 15 12 12 EESTON RAILAY STATION Trent Gateway is located within Beeston Business 16 13 SEE ELO FOR CONTINUATION Park, a 40 acre site providing a mix of industrial and SOLD SOLD UNDER OFFER 13 SEE ELO FOR 14 CONTINUATION office accommodation SEE AOVE FOR 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 9 CONTINUATION714 5 3 15 Easily accessible from Junction 25 of the M1 15 EESTON RAILAY STATION 16 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EESTON RAILAY STATION Business park environment overlooking the 25 16 Attenborough Nature Reserve 27 SEE AOVE FOR SEE AOVE FOR Unit 2 Immediately adjacent to Beeston Railway Station and 29 CONTINUATION CONTINUATION Unit 4 a short walk to Beeston Town Centre and the tram 31 SOLD Accommodation TECHNOLOGY DRIVE East Midlands International Airport is 12 miles south TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 33 of the Business Park and easily accessible from the M1 LILAC GROVE Unit Ground Floor First Floor Total 3 16,287 3,018 19,305 ROAD MEADO SOLD SOLD 5 8,801 1,912 10,713 SOLD 4 LILAC GROVE Green 7 SOLD LILAC GROVE 9 SOLD ROAD MEADO Credentials LAURNUM GROVE MEADO ROAD MEADO SOLD Units 3-33 Chancerygate employed the latest environmentally 11 11,035 2,073 13,108 SOLD 146,927 sq ft of industrial/ friendly technologies to reduce the costs of occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Implementation Programme
    Chapter 12: Implementation Programme Chapter 12: Implementation Programme Local Transport Plan for Greater Nottingham | Final Plan 2006/7 - 2010/11 303 Chapter 12: Implementation Programme 304 Local Transport Plan for Greater Nottingham | Final Plan 2006/7 - 2010/11 Chapter 12: Implementation Programme Chapter 12: Implementation Programme This chapter sets out the proposed spending and delivery programme over the five-year Plan period based on the Government’s ‘planning guideline’ spending budgets, including the justification for, and programme of major schemes. It also identifies other potential funding sources, explains how value for money will be achieved across the programme and identifies programme risks. Contents 12.1 Planned Resources 307 12.1.1 2006/07 Settlement 307 12.1.2 Final Planning Guidelines 308 12.1.3 Camera Safety Partnership Funding 308 12.2 Resource Allocations 309 12.3 Priorities within the Programme 309 12.4 Planned Scheme Delivery 311 12.5 Programme Development 313 12.6 Major Scheme Bids 320 12.6.1 Hucknall Town Centre Improvement Scheme 320 12.6.2 Ring Road Major 323 12.7 Other Major Schemes 327 12.7.1 The Turning Point 327 12.7.2 Gedling Transport Improvement Scheme 327 12.7.3 Nottingham Express Transit Phase 2 328 12.7.4 Nottingham Station Masterplan 331 12.7.5 Eastside Transport Strategy 333 12.8 Major Schemes’ Contributions to Plan Objectives 334 12.9 Major Scheme Funding Requirements 335 12.10 Value for Money and Risk Management 335 12.11 Local Charging 336 12.11.1 Workplace Parking Levy 337 12.11.2 Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Beeston Land Disposal Decison Notice
    5 July 2018 Network licence condition 7 (land disposal): Beeston Goods Yard, Nottinghamshire Decision 1. On 10 May 2018, Network Rail gave notice of its intention to dispose of land at Beeston Goods Yard, Nottinghamshire (the land), in accordance with paragraph 7.2 of condition 7 of its network licence. The land is described in more detail in the notice (copy attached) and the additional plan provided by Network Rail at Annex B. 2. We have considered the information supplied by Network Rail including the responses received from third parties you have consulted. For the purposes of condition 7 of Network Rail’s network licence, ORR consents to the disposal of the land in accordance with the particulars set out in its notice. Reasons for decision 3. We are satisfied that Network Rail has consulted all relevant stakeholders with current information and no objections were left unresolved. 4. In considering the proposed disposal, we note that there is no evidence that railway operations would be affected adversely. In particular, we note that Network Rail has: confirmed to us that it has amended the boundary of the proposed disposal to accommodate additional land required for future platform extension (Annex B); addressed East Midlands Trains’ concerns by retaining land to facilitate an additional 60 car parking spaces at Beeston station (plan 6167944); and stated that it has removed the site from the supplementary strategic freight site list having gained industry agreement to do so1. 5. Therefore, based on all the evidence we have received and taking into account all the material facts and views relevant to our consideration under condition 7, we are satisfied that there are no issues for us to address.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Beeston Business Park, Technology Drive and Sports Ground and Pavilion, Trent Vale Road, Beeston, Nottinghamshire
    Beeston Business Park 13015 - D&A - Rev P2 Land at Beeston Business Park, Technology Drive and Sports Ground and Pavilion, Trent Vale Road, Beeston, Nottinghamshire. NG9 1LA Design & Access Statement April2014 Beeston Business Park 13015 - D&A - Rev P2 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Development Description 1.2 Planning Application Proposal Details 1.3 Scope and Content of the D&A 2.0 CONTEXT 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Physical Context 2.3 Social & Economic Context 2.4 Planning Context—Incl Public Consultation 3.0 SITE ANALYSIS 3.1 Constraints 3.2 Opportunities 4.0 DESIGN EVOLUTION 5.0 SCHEME DESIGN 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Use 5.3 Layout 5.4 Scale & Massing 5.5 Phasing 5.6 Access 5.7 Flooding 5.8 Technical Reports 6.0 DETAILED SCHEME DESIGN Some of the images within this document represent design 7.0 CONCLUSION development – reference should be made to the planning application drawings for up to date information. 8.0 APPENDIX Beeston Business Park 13015 - D&A - Rev P2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Development Description This Planning Statement has been prepared on behalf of M7 Real Estate LLP to support a planning application for the redevelopment of the Beeston Business Park, Beeston Rylands. The Applicant seeks planning permission for the following development: Full planning permission for Industrial/offices (Class B1, B2, and B8), health centre ( Class D1), social club (Class D2/A4) and general retail (Class A1), new/replacement sports pitches with ancillary sports club buildings, and associated road infrastructure, car parking including a new car park for the Beeston Railway Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together: What We Do Best Elections for Community Directors
    Working together: what we do best Volume 2, Issue 12, August 2016 Elections for Community Directors at INSPIRE INSPIRE is the newly created organisation set up to run the Nottinghamshire County Library Service and Nottinghamshire Archives. The libraries, archives and local studies departments are all vital, essential resources for all of us who are involved in local or family history and we need to show our support as much as we can. Please get involved. Join INSPIRE. Have a say in how INSPIRE is run by voting in the elections for community board members. Only registered members of INSPIRE are able to vote. To read the candidate manifestos and to vote, please visit the website https://www.inspireculture.org.uk/ before Midnight on Monday 19 September. Results will be announced one week later. Non-members can join and then vote. So, it isn’t too late to sign up. Our colleague Richard Gaunt is standing for one of these community board positions and NLHA are fully supporting his bid in order to ensure that someone with a local history/heritage background represents our community and works for all our interests at INSPIRE NLHA Autumn Day School at Ravenshead on Saturday 22 October 2016 between 10:00am and 4:00pm. For this Day School we have adopted the theme of Food History we will look, over time, at the introduction, preparation and use of various items of food and drink now taken for granted plus some recent hot & spicy introductions. We will also examine the cultural, economic, environmental, and sociological impacts of food.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Main Modifications Final
    Appendix – Main Modifications The modifications below are expressed either in the conventional form of strikethrough for deletions and underlining for additions of text, or by specifying the modification in words in italics. The page numbers and paragraph numbering below refer to the submission local plan, and do not take account of the deletion or addition of text. 1 Main Modifications (MM) Main Page No/Policy/Para Details of Amendment Modification Number MM1 Page 20 – Policy 1 Policy 1: Flood Risk Development will not be permitted in areas at risk from any form of flooding unless: 1. There are no suitable and reasonably available alternative locations for the proposed development in a lower-risk area outside the Green Belt; and 2. In the case of fluvial flooding, the proposal is protected by the Nottingham Trent Left Bank Flood Alleviation Scheme or other flood defences of equivalent quality standard of protection; and 3. Provision is made for access to watercourses (8 metres for ‘main river’) and flood risk management assets; and 4. Measures are included to: a) mitigate any residual fluvial flood risk; b) provide flood compensation where it is appropriate; and c) ensure, including by the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS), that: that surface water run-off is reduced by 30% compared with predevelopment rates. i. developments on greenfield sites maintain greenfield (pre- development) surface water run off rates ii. developments on brownfield sites reduce surface run off by a minimum of 30% compared with pre-development rates. Page 21 – Policy 1 – Para 1.4 Justification Text 1.4 With regard to point 4 of the policy, flood mitigation will be required in all cases (whether the site is defended or not).
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Guide to the Blue Plaques of Beeston, Chilwell, Attenborough, Toton, Stapleford and Bramcote
    AN ILLUSTR ATED GUIDE TO THE BLUE PLAQUES OF BEESTON, CHILWELL, ATTENBOROUGH, TOTON, STAPLEFORD & BR AMCOTE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION PAGE Sitting on the county boundary between Nottinghamshire About the Plaque Group 2 and Derbyshire are the townships of Beeston, Chilwell, How the scheme worked 3 Attenborough, Toton, Stapleford and Bramcote - all in the Finding a Plaque 4 south of Broxtowe, an area rich in history. A borough since BEESTON PAGE 1977, Broxtowe is part of one of Nottinghamshire’s ancient 1 Francis Wilkinson 5 ‘Hundreds’ dating back to Saxon times. 2 William Thompson (Bendigo) 6 3 Site of Swiss Mills 7 These six townships were home to some quite extraordinary 4 The Ten Bell 8 individuals from the past. Innovators, industrialists and 5 Sir Louis Frederick Pearson, CBE 9 entrepreneurs, figures from the worlds of journalism, 6 Edward Joseph Lowe, FRS 10 banking, stage and screen, sport, science, the church and 7 Thomas Humber 11 the military have all left their mark. Our plaques are a 8 Lt. Colonel Dr Brian Duncan Shaw, MM 12 reminder of the links between the people who have shaped 9 Beeston Station 13 our community and the places where they lived and worked. 10 William Frederick Wallett 14 They celebrate achievement with a local flavour. 11 Rev. Dr John Clifford, CH 15 12 George Wilkinson 16 Transport pioneer, Thomas Barton, was the first to be 13 Beeston Lads’ Club 17 commemorated on 25th August 2010, with Beeston Station 14 Arthur Cossons 18 - the last of thirty-four - unveiled on 8th October 2014. 15 Village Cross 19 Sir Neil Cossons, the Beeston-born Chairman of English 16 Beeston Manor House 20 Heritage from 2000-2007, attended both ceremonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Open Days Visit, Please Check Entries at for Last-Minute Changes
    Properties and events in Nottinghamshire 2017 Before heading out for your Heritage Open Days visit, please check entries at www.heritageopendays.org.uk for last-minute changes. Annesley Old Church A608, Annesley, Nottinghamshire, Annesley, Nottinghamshire, NG15 0AE Conserved ruins of 12th Century Grade I Listed Norman church in beautiful rural setting. There will be guided tours of the site and talks about its fascinating history. The site is reputed to be haunted and a storyteller will be relating accounts of spooky goings on. The grounds of the church make an ideal picnic spot. There will be opportunities to join the Friends of Annesley Old Church group. Toilet with disabled access is provided on site and transport to be event by prior arrangement. Opening Times Saturday 9 September: 11.00 am - 2.00 pm Booking Details Pre-booking: Preferred Transport form Kirkby in Ashfield pick up points must be pre booked Contact: John Tattersfield Call: 01623457091 Email: [email protected] Write to: Ashfield District Council, Urban Road, kirkby in Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 8DA Booking opens: 17 August 2017 09:00 Booking closes: 6 September 2017 15:30 Access Information Gravel sloped path onto site Additional information Max 10 people per tour/session. Entry to the site and event is free. Transport to and from pick ups in the Kirkby-in-Ashfield area need to be booked in advance. £2 per adult, £1 per child under 18 Directions Off M1 Junction 27. East onto A608 signposted Mansfield towards Annesley. Annesley Old Church signposted on right before roundabout. Attenborough, St.Mary the Virgin Church Church Lane, Attenborough, Beeston, Nottinghamshire, NG9 6AS The Church is Grade I listed as a building of outstanding architectural or historic interest.
    [Show full text]
  • [Name of Discipline]
    TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING M7 Real Estate Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham Transport Assessment TRANSPORT & INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING M7 Real Estate Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham Transport Assessment Birmingham Livery Place, 35 Livery Street, Colmore Business District Birmingham, B3 2PB +44 (0)121 233 3322 Leeds Whitehall Waterfront, 2 Riverside Way Leeds LS1 4EH +44 (0)113 233 8000 London 15 Weller Street London, SE1 1QU +44 (0)20 7234 9122 Manchester 4th Floor Carvers Warehouse, 77 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HG +44 (0)161 233 4260 Nottingham 5TH Floor, Waterfront House, Station Street Nottingham, NG2 3DQ +44 (0)115 9241100 www.bwbconsulting.com [email protected] PROJECT NUMBER: BMT 2091 REPORT REFERENCE: BMW 2091 TA Rev 3 VERSION DATE AUTHOR CHECK APPROVE COMMENTS 1 14.02.14 James Byrne Tim Cooke Tim Cooke First Internal Draft 2 31.03.2014 James Byrne Tim Cooke Tim Cooke Issued to Client 3 10.04.2014 James Byrne Tim Cooke Tim Cooke Planning Version BWB Consulting Ltd Registered in England 5265863 consultancy | environment | infrastructure | buildings www.bwbconsulting.com LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3 CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Site location Existing use Local highway network Pedestrian travel Cycle based travel Bus based public transport Rail based public transport NET2 tramline extension Local Facilities Education Essential Facilities Employment Summary Personal injury accident (PIA) data Traffic survey
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Nottingham and Ashfield Housing Needs Assessment 2020
    R E B O 0 T 2 C 0 2 O Greater Nottingham & Ashfield Housing Needs Assessment Final Report Iceni Projects Limited on behalf of the Greater Nottingham Planning I PROJECTS LIMITED Partnership PLANNING PLANNING PARTNERSHIP ICEN ON GREATER BEHALF OF NOTTINGHAM THE October 2020 Iceni Projects London: Da Vinci House, 44 Saffron Hill, London, EC1N 8FH Glasgow: 177 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 2LB Manchester: 68 Quay Street, Manchester, M3 3EJ Edinburgh: 11 Alva Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4PH t: 020 3640 8508 | w: iceniprojects.com | e: [email protected] Greater Nottingham & Ashfield & Nottingham Greater FINAL REPORT HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT linkedin: linkedin.com/company/iceni-projects | twitter: @iceniprojects 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 13 THE PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ....................................................................... 15 DEMOGRAPHIC BASELINE AND THE HOUSING MARKET .................................. 17 IDENTIFYING SUBMARKETS .................................................................................. 34 AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED ............................................................................. 57 OLDER PERSONS HOUSING NEEDS & HOUSING PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES . ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beeston Town Centre Plan Supplementary Planning Document Adopted June 2008
    Positive People - Positive Leadership - Positive Partnerships Beeston Town Centre Plan Supplementary Planning Document Adopted June 2008 Planning Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 3. Baseline Analysis Context History Policy Context. Socio-Economics Market and Retail Findings Urban Design Analysis 4. Option Assessment Developing the Aims and Objectives Initial Concepts Consultation Issues and Options Consultation Draft Preferred Options Consultation 5. The Vision Beeston Town Centre Vision Aims and Objectives 6. Strategic Development Framework Planning Policy Urban Design Guiding Principles Access and Movement Principles Public Realm Improvements. 7. Development Opportunity Sites Key Development Areas The Square Foster Avenue Car Park High Road Sainsbury’s Villa Street Northern Gateway 1 Eastern Gateway Chilwell Road Summary of Potential Outputs 8. Access and Movement Strategy 9. Preferred Option for Public Realm 10. Delivery and Implementation Beeston Town Centre – Delivering the Vision The Role of the Public Sector Town Centre Management Management and Maintenance The Square Foster Avenue The Square without NET Sainsbury’s Development Area Northern Approach Eastern Approach Chilwell Road 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Atkins Ltd and Fisher Hargreaves Proctor were appointed by Broxtowe Borough Council (‘the Council’), Nottingham Regeneration Limited (NRL), Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC), Nottingham Express Transit (NET) and the Greater Nottingham Partnership (GNP) to undertake a Town Centre Masterplan for Beeston. 1.2 The Masterplan forms the basis of a document which was to have become an Area Action Plan (AAP) 2007 – 2022 for the Town Centre as set out in Broxtowe Borough Council’s original Local Development Scheme. As now modified into a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) it will form a statutory planning document under the new Local Development Framework in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 and the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
    [Show full text]