TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING

M7 Real Estate Ltd

Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham

Transport Assessment

TRANSPORT & INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING

M7 Real Estate Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham

Transport Assessment

Birmingham Livery Place, 35 Livery Street, Colmore Business District Birmingham, B3 2PB +44 (0)121 233 3322

Leeds Whitehall Waterfront, 2 Riverside Way Leeds LS1 4EH +44 (0)113 233 8000

London 15 Weller Street London, SE1 1QU +44 (0)20 7234 9122

Manchester 4th Floor Carvers Warehouse, 77 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HG +44 (0)161 233 4260

Nottingham 5TH Floor, Waterfront House, Station Street Nottingham, NG2 3DQ +44 (0)115 9241100

www.bwbconsulting.com [email protected]

PROJECT NUMBER: BMT 2091 REPORT REFERENCE: BMW 2091 TA Rev 3

VERSION DATE AUTHOR CHECK APPROVE COMMENTS

1 14.02.14 James Byrne Tim Cooke Tim Cooke First Internal Draft

2 31.03.2014 James Byrne Tim Cooke Tim Cooke Issued to Client

3 10.04.2014 James Byrne Tim Cooke Tim Cooke Planning Version

BWB Consulting Ltd Registered in England 5265863 consultancy | environment | infrastructure | buildings www.bwbconsulting.com

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

CONTENTS PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Site location Existing use Local highway network Pedestrian travel Cycle based travel Bus based public transport Rail based public transport NET2 tramline extension Local Facilities Education Essential Facilities Employment Summary Personal injury accident (PIA) data Traffic survey information 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 16 Development proposals Site access Parking Servicing 4.0 TRIP GENERATION 20 Introduction Existing site vehicle trip generation Units to be redeveloped Units to be redeveloped Proposed use vehicle trip generation Net traffic generation 5.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL 26 Introduction Opportunities for pedestrian based journeys Opportunities for cycle based journeys Opportunities for public transport based journeys 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 28 Trip distribution Traffic assignment 7.0 ASSESSMENT YEAR AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FLOWS 30 Background traffic flows Assessment year Total traffic flows 8.0 HIGHWAY IMPACT 31 Introduction Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road 9.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 33

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

TABLES

Table 1 Summary of local train services from Beeston Railway Station Table 2 Summary of local facilities Table 3 Retail trip breakdown Table 4 Summary of net change in vehicle trips for total development Table 5 Modal splits Table 6 Summary of vehicle assignment Table 7 PICADY results Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road Table 8 Linsig results Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road

FIGURES

Figure 1 General site location plan Figure 2 Pedestrian catchment area Figure 3 Detailed site location plan Figure 4 Cycling catchment area Figure 5 Local cycle routes Figure 6 Local bus network Figure 7 NET2 tramline extension through Beeston Figure 8 Local facilities plan Figure 9 PIA data summary Figure 10 Road works from NET2 tramline extension Figure 11 Development traffic distribution Figure 12 Retained business park trip assignment Figure 13 Proposed business park trip assignment Figure 14 Proposed residential trip assignment (main site) Figure 15 Proposed residential trip assignment (South Road) Figure 16 Proposed health centre trip assignment Figure 17 Proposed retail trip assignment (new trips) Figure 18 Proposed retail trip assignment (pass-by) Figure 19 Proposed car park trip assignment Figure 20 2011 base flow Figure 21 2028 base flow Figure 22 2028 base flow with development

DRAWINGS

BMT/2091/100 P2 Proposed junction layout BMT/2091/110 P2 Vehicle tracking assessment

APPENDICES

Appendix A Masterplan Appendix B NET2 tramline extension Appendix C PIA data Appendix D Traffic counts Appendix E Beeston plans taken from the Local Plan Appendix F Existing use TRICS outputs Appendix G Proposed use TRICS outputs Appendix H Journey to work data Appendix I PICADY output Appendix J Linsig output

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BWB Consulting Ltd was commissioned by M7 Real Estate Ltd to provide highways and transport advice for redevelopment of the Beeston Business Park, Beeston Rylands.

1.2 The Applicant seeks planning permission for the following development:  Full planning permission for Industrial/offices (Class B1, B2, and B8), health centre (Class D1), social club (Class D2/A4) and general retail (Class A1), new/replacement sports pitches with ancillary sports club buildings and associated road infrastructure, car parking including a new car park for the Beeston Railway Station.  Outline planning permission for up to 285 residential units including means of access.

1.3 The illustrative masterplan is attached as Appendix A. The proposed scheme will fit around current existing development that is to be retained.

1.4 For the purposes of the Transport Assessment, and to provide a robust assessment, the site has been treated as a single development with all elements of the development coming forward together.

1.5 The project has been subject to pre-application discussions with Nottingham County Council (NCC). This Transport Assessment reflects these discussions and the methodology, trip rates, junction assessments and survey extents were all agreed with NCC at this stage.

1.6 The methodology used for this Transport Assessment (TA) in support of the planning application takes account of Guidance on Transport Assessment1. Hence, this TA examines, and where appropriate, provides further detail on the following:  the existing use of the site;  opportunities to travel to and from the site by sustainable modes of transport;  the proposed development;  the access strategy;  the trip generation of the proposed development by all modes;  the anticipated trip distribution; and  the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding highway network, and the operation of the site access junctions.

1.7 The Government’s sustainability objectives were embodied in updated Planning Policy Guidance. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)2 confirms that “developments should be located and designed where practical to;  accommodate the efficient delivery of goods and supplies;  give priority to pedestrian and cycle movements, and have access to high quality public transport facilities;  create safe and secure layouts which minimise conflicts between traffic and cyclists or pedestrians, avoiding street clutter and where appropriate establishing home zones;  incorporate facilities for charging plug-in and other ultra-low emission vehicles; and  consider the needs of people with disabilities by all modes of transport”.

1 Guidance on Transport Assessment, Department for Communities and Local Government and the Department for Transport, March 2007 2 National Planning Policy Framework, Department for Communities and Local Government, March 2012

1

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

1.8 It goes onto say “All developments that generate significant amounts of movement should be supported by a Transport Statement or Transport Assessment. Plans and decisions should take account of whether:  the opportunities for sustainable transport modes have been taken up depending on the nature and location of the site, to reduce the need for major transport infrastructure;  safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all people; and  improvements can be undertaken within the transport network that cost effectively limit the significant impacts of the development. Development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts of development are severe.”

1.9 The Transport Assessment considers the potential transport and highways impact of the proposals including the impact of the development generated traffic on the capacity and safety of the surrounding road network and the implications for public transport and pedestrian and cycling movements.

1.10 An on-going transport planning process at the site will be required, in line with Government Policy to ensure the efficient operation of the site. Therefore a Travel Plan will be implemented at the site. A residential Travel Plan and employment Travel Plan Framework have been provided as stand-alone documents as part of the application. These include incentives to encourage sustainable travel from the onset of occupation.

2

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Site Location

2.1 The proposed site is located at Beeston Business Park in Beeston, approximately 4.0km south west of Nottingham City Centre. The general site location is shown at Figure 1.

Figure 1: General site location plan

Existing use

2.2 The existing site is currently a business park comprising of 19.4 hectares, approximately 6.3 hectares of which is office and industrial development (B1/B2/B8). The operators of the business park have indicated that the current site is approximately 55% unoccupied.

2.3 Access to the site is currently gained from Technology Drive which forms a priority controlled cross road junction with Meadow Road and Laburnum Groove.

2.4 The site is bound by residential dwellings to the north, east and west and the Attenborough Nature Reserve to the southwest. The railway line and Meadow Road form the western and eastern perimeters of the site respectively.

Local highway network

2.5 The existing business park is served via Technology Drive located to the north western corner of the site. This road also serves the train station car park, the ATOS building and the social club adjacent to the site. Technology Drive is lit, subject to a 30mph speed limit and benefits from pedestrian footways on both sides of the carriageway.

3

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

2.6 The road extends to the east and forms a cross road junction with Meadow Road and Laburnum Grove. Technology Drive has a two lane approach to the junction and the Meadow Road mainline carriageway benefits from a ghost island right turn harbourage into Technology Drive.

2.7 Meadow Road broadly runs in a northwest to southeast direction, is lit and is subject to a 30 mph speed limit. To the west of the site, the road forms a bridge crossing over the railway lines and forms a signalised cross road junction with Queens Road West (A6005)/Station Road. To the southeast of the site, Meadow Road is residential in nature and provides access to the residential area of Rylands within which the site is located.

2.8 Queens Road West extends through Beeston and provides access to the wider road network within the vicinity of the site. There are a number of mixed uses along the frontage including residential terrace housing and commercial units.

2.9 In terms of the wider road network, Derby Road (A52) can be accessed to the north of the site via Queens Road West. This road provides direct access to the M1 at junction 25 to the west and Clifton Boulevard (A6514) and Nottingham City Centre to the east.

Pedestrian travel

2.10 The Guidelines for Providing for Journeys on Foot3 document describes acceptable walking distances for pedestrians without mobility impairment. They suggest that, for commuting, up to 500 metres is the desirable walking distance, up to 1,000 metres is an acceptable walking distance and 2,000 metres is the preferred maximum walking distance.

2.11 Figure 2 below, identifies a 2km catchment isochrone from the centre of the site. It demonstrates that the whole of Beeston, including the public transport services, the local retail centre, primary schools and local services are all within walking distance of the site.

2.12 Technology Drive benefits from a 2.0-2.5 metre wide footway on both sides of the carriageway fronting the site which are well maintained and lit. The footways provide access to the extensive network of road-side footways that form a comprehensive and coherent network of routes within the vicinity of the site and the areas of Beeston and Rylands. There is also a pedestrian link to Beeston Railway Station adjacent to the site.

2.13 To the east of the site, Meadow Road has a 2.0-3.0 metre wide footway along both sides of the carriageway. These extend throughout the residential area of Rylands to the east and south of the site and towards Queens Road West to the north west of the site.

3 Guidelines for Providing for Journeys on Foot, Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation

4

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Figure 2: Pedestrian catchment area

2.14 The proposed site benefits from good, direct pedestrian desire lines from the site to the local facilities (Figure 3). The available footways in the vicinity of the site provide direct routes to the local centre of Beeston, public transport services and Trent Vale Infant School.

2.15 The roads along the desire lines have drop kerb crossing points at all junctions and there is a signalised pedestrian crossing at the crossroad junction of Meadow Road/Queens Road West/Station Road.

2.16 Overall, within the vicinity of the site and Rylands and Beeston as a whole, there are excellent levels of pedestrian infrastructure and crossing facilities, proving a safe, convenient and reliable route for pedestrians accessing the site. The footways are in good condition, lit and well maintained.

2.17 Given the areas contained within the pedestrian catchment area, and the existing pedestrian infrastructure, it is considered that the site is accessible to pedestrians, and there are excellent opportunities for pedestrians to walk between the site, public transport services and the local facilities within Beeston.

5

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Figure 3: Detailed site location plan

Cycle based travel

2.18 Local Transport Note (LTN) 1/044 states that there are limits to the distances generally considered acceptable for cycling. The mean average length for cycling is 4km (2.4 miles), although journeys of up to three times this distance are not uncommon for regular commuters. It is widely considered that cycling has the potential to substitute for short car trips, particularly those under 5km, and form part of a longer journey by public transport. Cycling is therefore an important journey to work mode that has the potential to perform a more significant role.

2.19 Figure 4 shows that a 5km distance centred at the site would encompass all of Beeston and the adjacent areas of Bramcote, Clifton, Stapleford, Long Eaton and the Edge of Nottingham City Centre.

4 Department for Transport – Local Transport Note 1/04. Policy, Planning and Design for Walking and Cycling. 2004

6

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Figure 4: Cycling catchment area

2.20 Figure 5 identifies that there are a number of dedicated cycle facilities within the immediate vicinity of the site. These include National Route 6 (NR6), the Greater Nottingham Cycle Route, The Big Track, the Erewash Valley Trail and a number of local links. There is a designated shared cycle and pedestrian footway to the west of the site across Meadow Road.

Figure 5: Local cycle routes

2.21 The cycle routes within the 5km isochrone of the site offer traffic free and with traffic sections of routes. These links can all be accessed directly from the site via Meadow Road and provide unbroken routes to Beeston, Nottingham, Long Eaton the surrounding area.

7

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

2.22 The topography of the local area suggests that this would not be a limiting factor in people choosing to cycle. As a result of the above, it is concluded that there are good opportunities, with no real physical barriers, for cycle travel between the site and the surrounding areas.

Bus based public transport

2.23 The Guidelines for Planning for Public Transport in Developments5, states that “generally walking distances to bus stops in urban areas should be a maximum of 400m and preferably no more than 300m”.

2.24 In relation to the site, the nearest bus stops are located opposite the site on Meadow Road (Figure 3). These are served by two services, the 18 and 20 and can be accessed within a short walk of the site via the existing pedestrian infrastructure.

2.25 Additional services can be accessed on Queens Road West and Station Road, approximately 500 metres walking distance from the site. These are served by a further six services. A summary of the services that operate adjacent to the site is provided in Figure 6 below.

2.26 Further bus services can be accessed within Beeston at the bus station.

Figure 6: Local bus network

5 Guidelines for Planning For Public Transport In Developments’, Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation, 1999

8

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

2.27 A summary of the details of the services is provided below: 18 Nottingham – Beeston – Stapleford  The service operates Monday to Friday with a frequency of 30 minutes. First and last services from the site are 0621 and 0006.  The service operates on a Saturday with a frequency of 30 minutes. First and last services from the site are 0716 and 0006.  No service on a Sunday. 20 Nottingham – Beeston – Kirk Hallam – Ilkeston – Heanor  Sunday service only with a frequency of 60 minutes. First and last services from the site are 0932 and 2316. 36 Nottingham – Beeston - Chilwell  Between Monday – Saturday the service operates with a 20 minute service frequency. The first and last bus operates from 0502 and 0024 respectively.  During a Sunday, the service operates with a 20 minute service frequency. The first and last bus operates from 0602 and 2324 respectively. N36 Northampton – Beeston - Chilwell  The service operates between Monday to Saturday as an early morning service. There are three services each day (0115, 0215, 0315)  No Sunday service N34 Nottingham – Beeston  The service operates between Monday to Saturday as an early morning service.  Outbound services include 0040, 0140, 0240 and 0340  Inbound services include 0115, 0215, 0315, 0415  No Sunday service Y5 Nottingham – Beeston – Long Eaton – Draycott - Derby  The service operates between Monday to Friday with a frequency of 20 minutes. The first and last services are 0545 and 2355.  The service operates on a Saturday with a frequency of 20 minutes. The first and last services are 0625 and 2355.  The service operates on a Sunday with a frequency of 30 minutes. The first and last services are 0640 and 2245. Skylink Nottingham – Beeston – Long Eaton – East Midlands Airport - Loughborough  The service operates between Monday to Sunday with a frequency of 30 minutes. The first and last services are 0116 and 2346. Indigo Northampton – Beeston  The service operates between Monday to Friday with a frequency of 5 – 10 minutes. The first and last services are 0120 and 1250.

2.28 These services provide access to the local areas surrounding Beeston and the wider destinations of Nottingham, Long Eaton, Derby, Chilwell and Stapleford. The bus services can all be accessed within a short walking distance of the site using the existing pedestrian infrastructure along the desire lines. In addition to these, further bus services are available from Beeston Bus Station.

9

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Rail based public transport

2.29 The nearest railway station to the site is Beeston Railway Station located adjacent to the site. In terms of the facilities onsite, there is cycle storage, a staffed ticket office and self-service machines. A summary of the available services from the station is provided in Table 1.

Frequency Journey Time Destination (per hour) (minutes) Leicester 2 25/43 Birmingham New Street 1 71 Nottingham 4 10 St Pancreas International 1 112 Matlock 1 62 Burton upon Trent 1 38 Derby 2 25 Table 1: Summary of local train services from Beeston Railway Station

2.30 Regular services are available to the surrounding areas including Nottingham, Derby and Matlock and the wider destinations of Burton upon Trent, Leicester, Birmingham and London where further local and national services can be accessed.

NET2 tramline extension

2.31 The NET2 tramline extension was awarded to Tramlink by NCC in December 2011. The new tram route will extend between Toton Lane Park and Ride site in Chilwell to Nottingham Railway Station in the city centre. The route is planned to route through Beeston along Chilwell Road and High Road. A summary is provided in Figure 7 below.

Figure 7: NET2 tramline extension through Beeston

2.32 The full map of the route is attached at Appendix B. The Tramline extension will significantly increase the accessibility of the site and would provide further

10

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

opportunities for people travelling to or from the site via non car modes of transport.

Local Facilities

2.33 The majority of trips that will be made by walking are for the purpose of short shopping trips, access to leisure facilities, trips to school and trips to bus stops as part of linked trips to other destinations. Not all facilities and services, not to mention job opportunities will be within a reasonable walk distance and therefore it is important to ensure that there are bus services that are accessible.

2.34 Of particular interest are the levels of facilities and services that can be accessed locally. This is important in reducing the intensity of car use. The local services available in the vicinity of the site are shown on Figure 8 below.

Figure 8: Local facilities plan

Education

2.35 The proposed site location benefits from good links to the local primary school within Rylands. Trent Vale Infant and Nursery School and Rylands Junior School are located approximately 600 metres walking distance to the southeast of the site on Trent Road. This can be accessed via the existing established continuous footway network within the vicinity of the site. There is a good level of permeability through the existing residential areas, minimising the need to walk along or cross main roads.

2.36 In terms of secondary school education, the closest school is Alderman White Secondary School located approximately 2.5km to the northwest of the site and can be accessed via the existing bus network (18).

11

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

2.37 The National Travel Survey (NTS) 20126 is the primary source of data on personal travel patterns in Great Britain. This has shown that the average journey distance to primary and secondary schools is 1.8 miles and 3.4 miles respectively. The nearest primary and secondary schools are therefore both located less the average journey distance from the proposed site.

2.38 In addition to this, the NTS 2012 illustrates that for journeys to primary school less than 1 mile in length, 79% of journeys are by foot. In terms of journeys to secondary schools between 1 and 2 miles, 54% of trips are by foot, 3% by bicycle and 12% by bus. Car trips to secondary schools only comprise of 29% of journeys within this distance threshold.

2.39 Given the location of the nearest primary and secondary schools in relation to the site and the linkage to the existing pedestrian and public transport infrastructure, there is a significant opportunity for the use of non-car modes for journeys to the local schools.

Essential Facilities

2.40 The local centre of Beeston has a wide range of local facilities along the high street including, convenience stores, doctors, dentists, banks, cafes and mixed food and non-food retail units. Residents of the development can access these via the established pedestrian footway network that provides an unbroken link from the site to the local centre. The proposed development site benefits from good pedestrian access to these services and would constitute a 10 – 15 minute walk from the site.

2.41 In terms of larger food retail, a Tesco Extra is located on Station Road, to the north of the site. There is also a small local convenience store that sells basic food and household goods located adjacent to the site on Trent Road.

2.42 Larger retail centres and shopping opportunities can be accessed in Nottingham and Derby. These areas provide a larger selection of services both of which can be accessed by the local bus and train services that operate adjacent to the site.

2.43 In terms of nearby health services, there are doctors and dentist surgeries located on the high street within the centre of Beeston.

Employment

2.44 The site is well located to a large number of employment areas including Dunkirk Industrial Estate and Lenton Lane Industrial Estate to the east of the site and the University of Nottingham and Science Park to the north of the site. Further to this, the city centres of Nottingham and Derby can be easily accessed from the site using the available modes of public transport located within a short walk of the site.

Summary

2.45 Overall the site is extremely well located in terms of the local facilities that would be available to the residents. The site benefits from excellent pedestrian links to a wide range of local facilities within Beeston and excellent links to public transport. A summary of the local facilities available to the site are summarised in Table 2.

6 National Travel Survey 2012 – Statistical Release 30 July 2013 revised September 2013.

12

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Distance from Site Facilities Boundary Beeston Railway Station, bus services 18, 20, 36, N34, N36, Y5, Indigo and Skylink, Beeston local centre, Up to 800m doctors surgery, pharmacy, dentist, Trent Vale Infant and Junior School, Rylands Junior School, John Clifford Primary School, designated cycle routes 800 – 2,000m Employment areas University of Nottingham, Nottingham Trent 2,000 – 5,000m University, Nottingham City Centre Table 2: Summary of local facilities

2.46 In addition to this, it should be noted that the proposed development is for a mixed use site including employment and retail units. This would further strengthen the accessibility credentials of the site by providing services and employment opportunities to the residents within the overall site and further minimising the need to travel.

Personal injury accident (PIA) data

2.47 PIA data has been obtained from NCC for the most recent three year period available between from 01/10/2010 – 30/09/2013. The full details of the accident data including the study area, the severity and location of the accidents are attached as Appendix C. The study area of the PIA data search was agreed with NCC during pre-application discussions and a summary is provided in Figure 9 below.

Figure 9: PIA data summary

2.48 During this time period there was a total of nine PIA’s within the search area, all of which were classified as slight. In summary, two accidents occurred in the morning and six occurred during the inter peak hours. In terms of the peak hour periods, one accident occurred in the AM peak and no accidents occurred in the PM peak hour period.

13

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

2.49 It is important to note that during the search period, there have been no recorded accidents that have occurred in the vicinity of the site access junction of Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Drive.

2.50 Five of the accidents recorded within the search period involved vulnerable road users, two of these accidents involved pedestrians and three involved cyclists. Accidents 2D112912 and 2D046313 both involved a pedestrian. Accident 2D112912 occurred at the junction of Meadow Road/Grove Street and was attributable to the pedestrian not adequately looking and crossing outside of the pedestrian green phase. Accident 2D046313 occurred at the signalised crossroads junction of Queens Road/Station Road and involved a car colliding with a pedestrian at a set of temporary traffic lights. The accident was attributable to a set of defective traffic lights and not the road layout or geometry.

2.51 Three accidents involved cyclists within the search period (2D293812, 2D166813 and 2D084311). Accident 2D293812 occurred at the junction of Station Road/Lilac Grove and was attributable to the driver of the vehicle being affected by the sunlight. Accident 2D166813 occurred on Queens Road and involved two cyclists colliding with one another due to one cycle not having brakes. Accident 2D084311 occurred on Lilac Grove and involved a car colliding with a cyclist and was attributable to the weather conditions and sudden braking.

2.52 The remaining accidents that occurred with the search period did not indicate a specific highway safety concern. These accidents were attributable to driver error, impairment due to alcohol consumption and failure to adequately look.

2.53 The detailed review of the accidents indicated that there was not a specific cause of the accidents and that they were not attributable to the road design or layout. The type of accidents were typical of an urbanised network and the frequency and nature of PIA’s does not indicate a specific highway safety issue that would need to be addressed as part of these proposal

Traffic survey information

2.54 There are a number of road works currently in place within Beeston due to the NET2 Tramline extension. A summary of these is provided in Figure 10.

2.55 As agreed with NCC, it is not considered appropriate to commission traffic counts as they would not be reflective of the junctions under normal operation without the effect of the roadworks. To overcome this issue, traffic flows from the Meadow Road/Queens Road west signalised cross roads junction has been extracted from the Nottingham Traffic Model and obtained from NCC. This has been discussed with NCC and confirmed as a suitable method for traffic flow collection. The traffic flows data has been included at Appendix D.

2.56 In addition to this, an existing ATC was also obtained from NCC that was located on Meadow Road. The complete output of this survey is attached at Appendix D.

14

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Figure 10: Road works from NET2 tramline extension

15

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Development proposals

3.1 The proposed scheme involves the redevelopment of the Beeston Business Park, Beeston Rylands.

3.2 The Applicant seeks planning permission for the following development:  Full planning permission for Industrial/offices (Class B1, B2, and B8), health centre (Class D1), social club (Class D2/A4) and general retail (Class A1), new/replacement sports pitches with ancillary sports club buildings and associated road infrastructure, car parking including a new car park for the Beeston Railway Station.  Outline planning permission for up to 285 residential units including means of access.

3.3 The full planning application consists the following elements:  The provision of 10,359sqm of Class B1 (b/c)/B2/B8 industrial floor space  6,503sqm of Class B1(a) office floorspace  836sqm of Class A1 Retail development  464sqm of Class D1 ( health centre) floor space  325sqm of Class D2/A4 (social club) floor space  New/replacement sports pitches (including an artificial football pitch)  A club building associated with the enhanced sports pitch provision (1,179sqm in size)  Associated car parking (including a car park for 60 car spaces for use by patrons of the Beeston Railway Station)

3.4 Broxtowe Borough Council (BBC) requested that the area to the northeast perimeter of the site be allocated to the council as a parking facility for the adjacent railway station and this will be secured through a Section 106 Agreement. The station currently only has a small number of pay and display spaces located to the north of the site, under the carriageway. Rail services from this station are widely used and additional spaces is required.

3.5 The outline planning application relates to part of the existing business park (6.23 hectares of the whole) as well as a small area (0.67 hectares) of land with frontage onto South Road. The outline application seeks to establish the principle of residential development for up to 285 residential units with means of access. It is proposed to access the residential scheme through Technology Drive with no vehicle connection through to the adjacent residential streets albeit that connections to those local streets will be created for pedestrian and emergency vehicle movements. The small elements of the proposals will take access from South Road although that part of the site is unlikely to result in more than 25 additional residential units.

3.6 The illustrative masterplan is attached as Appendix A. The proposed scheme will fit around current existing development that is to be retained.

3.7 For the purposes of the Transport Assessment, and to provide a robust assessment, the site has been treated as a single development with all elements of the development coming forward together.

16

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Site access

3.8 The site will be served by the existing access to the site via the junction of Technology Drive/Meadow Road. This junction is currently a priority controlled crossroads junction that serves the existing business park and adjacent residential areas.

3.9 As the following sections will demonstrate, the proposed redevelopment of the site results in a net reduction of trips during the morning and evening peak hour periods when compared to the full existing operation of the site.

3.10 However it is proposed that the site access will be upgraded to a fully signalised junction to accommodate the traffic generation associated with the full use of the site. The proposed layout and staging plan is shown in Drawing BMT/2091/100 Revision P1.

3.11 There will be a number of pedestrian access points provided throughout the scheme. The main site access served via Technology Way benefits from footways on both sides of the carriageway with pedestrian refuges within the road to provide safe and convenient points to access the existing network of road side footways along the adjacent highway network.

3.12 In addition to this, the scheme will provide dedicated pedestrian links to the adjacent railway station and the existing residential roads including Nelson Road and Trent Vale Road. This will provide direct pedestrian linkages to the existing facilities within Beeston and the proposed sports centre and social club.

Parking

3.13 Given that the residential element of the proposed scheme is to be submitted in outline form, the final quantum of parking for this use will be provided in accordance with the relevant parking standards at the detailed design stage.

3.14 The relevant parking standards for all new developments are contained within Appendix 4 of the Broxtowe Local Plan[1]. The quantum of parking would therefore be assessed against the standards outlined in this document. This document has an area based approach for parking standards with development falling under either ‘Town Centre/Edge of centre’ and ‘Rest of Town’.

3.15 The definition within the guidance is as follows:

Edge of Centre In line with the definition included in PPG6, this refers to a location within 300 metres walking distance of the town centre (primary shopping area). For offices this distance can be extended to 500 metres. Although in many cases a simple concentric isochrone will suffice in defining the edge of centre, developers and officers will need to take into account significant geographical or other impediments that may alter this definition.

Rest of Town Town centres are clearly defined in the relevant Local Plan. The ‘Rest of Town’ category refers to any other location within the urban area that is not within the defined town centre.

[1] Appendix 4 – Guidance on parking. Broxtowe Local Plan 2004.

17

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

3.16 Based on the plans of Beeston within the Local Plan (Appendix E), the proposed site would fall under the ‘Rest of Town’ classification. Based on this, the ‘Rest of town’ classification should be used to derive the appropriate parking standards. A summary of these standards is provided below:  Food retail 1 space for per 14sqm GFA  Non food retail 1 space for per 20sqm GFA  B1 office only 1 space for per 35sqm (Urban town centre or edge of centre)  B1 Non-office and B2 General industry 1 space per 80sqm (Urban town centre or edge of centre)  B8 Warehousing 1 space per 180sqm  Medical centre 1 per member of staff 2 per consulting room  Assembly & leisure – other (D2) 1 per 22sqm  Miscellaneous All developments not covered by the above use classes will be assessed individually taking into account the location and likely requirements for access by all modes of transport.

3.17 There is no specific guidance on the parking standards for sports pitches within the Broxtowe Local Plan. There spaces are therefore assessed on a case by case basis and need to be in line with the operator’s requirements.

3.18 The proposed scheme provides primarily open employment use and hence as the individual units could come forward as B1 office use, the higher parking standards for employment uses have been adopted. Hence, based on the standards detailed above, the section of the proposed development located on the existing Beeston Business Park site could have a maximum total parking number of 557 which comprises of the following:  Retail 60 spaces  Business park 482 spaces  Assembly & leisure – other (D2) 15 spaces

3.19 It should be noted that no allowance has been made for the Medical centre as the level of staffing and consulting rooms is unknown at this stage and there are no specific standards for the sports pitches and pavilion.

3.20 The masterplan shows that the corresponding uses will have a total of 521 spaces. This is below the maximum levels and therefore the parking provision is consistent with local policy.

3.21 In addition to this, the sports pitches and new pavilion will provide a total of 38 spaces served from Trent Vale Road. There is no specific guidance with the local policy for this land use type and this level of parking is considered appropriate for the proposed end user.

3.22 Further to this, there is a section of Trent Vale Road located along the perimeter of the sports field site that provides a section of designated on street parking spaces. These spaces fall within the public highway boundary and although the surface is differentiated between the main carriageway, are not formally marked up. These spaces are currently used for the existing sports pitches and it was clear during the public consultation that the local residents wanted these maintained. The proposed scheme will therefore maintain these spaces and formalise them with white lining.

18

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

3.23 Discussions with NCC and Broxtowe Borough Council (BBC) will be undertaken during the planning application consultation period to ensure a suitable number cycle and disabled spaces are provided.

3.24 In terms of the servicing spaces, given the nature and size of the units on site, the delivery spaces could be accommodated within the open areas shown adjacent to the units. A tracking assessment has been undertaken for these spaces and demonstrates that there is suitable room to allow the units to be serviced. This is discussed further below.

Servicing

3.25 A tracking assessment has been undertaken on the proposed site access. Given the mixed use nature of the scheme, the proposed site access has been assessed using a maximum legal articulated vehicle. This vehicle would represent the worst case design vehicle that would access the site. Drawing BMT/2091/110 Revision P2 demonstrates that the design vehicle can access and egress the site without any conflicts.

19

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

4.0 TRIP GENERATION

Introduction

4.1 Guidance on Transport Assessment suggests that to quantify the impact of a proposed development on the local transport system, the number of person trips for all modes of transport that are likely to be generated by the development should be calculated.

4.2 The trip rates detailed below have been agreed during the pre-application discussions with NCC and have been included below for completeness.

Existing site vehicle trip generation

4.3 Given that the proposed development is for redevelopment of the existing Beeston Business Park, it is important to establish the level of trips that would have been generated by the current use. Not all of the units are currently in use. However they could operate without the need of a planning application for a similar land use and hence it is appropriate to take into account the traffic generation associated with these units.

4.4 The trips generated by the existing use would provide a base situation in which to offset the proposed development trips.

4.5 The overall site area of Beeston Business Park totals 19.4 hectares and based on the tenancy schedule provided by Beeston Business Park, the total floor area of all units on site is 60,241sqm. This is inclusive of the ATOS office building which totals 4,425sqm but is outside of the proposed red line and is in full operation.

4.6 Not all of the existing units will be redeveloped as part of the proposed scheme. A number of the units will be retained and these total 24,088sqm (inclusive of the ATOS building).

4.7 The remaining area of the units on site total 36,154sqm and are therefore to be redeveloped as part of the proposed scheme. In addition to this, the site operator has confirmed that there is an additional area of 4,554sqm of open storage which should be included as part of the existing use. This area of land was a former building but has since been demolished and is currently used as open storage. The overall site area to be redeveloped as part of the proposals therefore totals 40,708sqm.

4.8 To establish the forecast traffic generation from the existing site, the ‘Employment – Business Park’ category of the TRICS Database (version 2013(b)v 6.12.2 was examined. All sites located in Greater London and outside of England were deselected. A size filter of 60000 to 125,000sqm was chosen to reflect the size of the 19.4 hectare business park. The search criteria resulted in two sites.

4.9 Following a review of the resulting sites, TRICS site reference HC-02-B-01 was selected as the most comparable. This site is a 121,275sqm business park in Hampshire which comprised of a mix of office units, research and development facilities and light industrial units. A copy of the TRICS output is attached at Appendix F.

4.10 A summary of the trip rates is provided below:  0800 to 0900 1.375 arrive 0.366 depart 1.741 two-way  1700 to 1800 0.211 arrive 1.018 depart 1.229 two-way  0700 to 1900 4.569 arrive 4.459 depart 9.028 two-way

20

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Units to be redeveloped

4.11 Based on the existing floor area of 40,708sqm that is to be redeveloped, the number of total vehicle trips are as follows:  0800 to 0900 560 arrive 149 depart 709 two-way  1700 to 1800 86 arrive 414 depart 500 two-way  0700 to 1900 1,860 arrive 1,815 depart 3,675 two-way

4.12 A further assessment was undertaken to establish the level of HGV movements. The trip rates are summarised below:  0800 to 0900 0.013 arrive 0.010 depart 0.023 two-way  1700 to 1800 0.003 arrive 0.004 depart 0.007 two-way  0700 to 1900 0.072 arrive 0.069 depart 0.141 two-way

4.13 Based on the existing floor area of 40,708sqm that is to be redeveloped, the number of total HGV trips are as follows:  0800 to 0900 5 arrive 4 depart 9 two-way  1700 to 1800 1 arrive 2 depart 3 two-way  0700 to 1900 29 arrive 28 depart 57 two-way

Units to be retained

4.14 As detailed above, not all of the existing units will be redeveloped as part of the proposed scheme. A number of the units will be retained and these total 24,088sqm (inclusive of the ATOS building). The trip rates detailed above have been used to forecast the traffic generation from the section of Beeston Business Park that is to be retained.

4.15 Based on the area of units that are to be retained (24,088sqm), the number of total vehicle trips are as follows:  0800 to 0900 331 arrive 88 depart 419 two-way  1700 to 1800 51 arrive 245 depart 296 two-way  0700 to 1900 1,101 arrive 1,074 depart 2,175 two-way

4.16 The number of total HGV trips are as follows:  0800 to 0900 3 arrive 2 depart 5 two-way  1700 to 1800 1 arrive 1 depart 2 two-way  0700 to 1900 18 arrive 18 depart 36 two-way

Proposed use vehicle trip generation

4.17 The site is split into two separate areas. The development in the northern area will include for industrial/offices (Class B1, B2, and B8), health centre (Class D1), social club (Class D2/A4) and general retail (Class A1) and a new car park for the Beeston Railway Station.

4.18 The development in the southern area includes new/replacement sports pitches with ancillary sports club buildings

4.19 Based on the mixed use nature of the scheme comprising of local food/non-food retail, employment and healthcare, a significant level of the generated trips will be internalised and will not use the adjacent highway network. For the purposes of the scoping note the following uses have been specifically assessed:  Local shops/retail  Health Centre  Residential  Business park (Class B1, B2, and B8)

21

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

4.20 The trip generation for the retail units on site has been based on the local shops category within the TRICS database. This was considered appropriate as the development is providing a mix of food and non-food retail in a local centre area of the development.

4.21 To establish the forecast traffic generation from the proposed scheme, the TRICS Database (version 2013(a)v 6.11.2 was examined. All sites located in Greater London and outside of England were deselected. A size filter was selected to reflect the size of the proposed units. The TRICS sites for each query were ranked based on the AM, PM and 12 hour periods and the most suitable site was chosen. The full outputs are attached at Appendix G.

4.22 A summary of the trip rates for the proposed uses is provided below.

Residential  0800 to 0900 0.287 arrive 0.454 depart 0.741 two-way  1700 to 1800 0.463 arrive 0.296 depart 0.759 two-way

Local shops  0800 to 0900 7.591 arrive 7.261 depart 14.852 two-way  1700 to 1800 9.076 arrive 7.756 depart 16.832 two-way

Health Centre  0800 to 0900 2.905 arrive 0.894 depart 3.799 two-way  1700 to 1800 1.844 arrive 2.961 depart 4.805 two-way

4.23 The proposed B1, B2, and B8 uses within the site will be assessed using the same trip rates that were used for the existing operation of the business park.

4.24 As previously stated the above trip rates have previously been agreed with NCC.

4.25 It is important to note the trip rates used for the residential component of the scheme were ranked above the 85th percentile within the search for the AM period and as the 85th percentile for the PM period. In reality, given the excellent accessibility of the site and introduction of the tram to Beeston, the vehicle trip rates would be considerably less than this. However the higher trip rates have been used to provide a worst case assessment.

4.26 Further to this, all of the vehicle trips generated by the local shops will not be new to the network. The vehicle trips will comprise of pass-by, linked and new trips. In addition to this, the majority of trips to the convenience store will be internalised given the nature of the proposed scheme and level of residential units on site. Based on this and experience of similar schemes it has been assumed that 30% of the trips will be new to the network. This level has been agreed with NCC during pre-application discussions.

4.27 A summary of the development generated trips based on the above trip rates is provided below:

Residential (285 units)  0800 to 0900 82 arrive 129 depart 211 two-way  1700 to 1800 132 arrive 84 depart 216 two-way

Business park (16,862sqm)  0800 to 0900 232 arrive 62 depart 294 two-way  1700 to 1800 36 arrive 172 depart 208 two-way

22

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Local shops (30% of trip rate) (836sqm)  0800 to 0900 19 arrive 18 depart 37 two-way  1700 to 1800 23 arrive 20 depart 43 two-way

Health Centre (464sqm)  0800 to 0900 13 arrive 4 depart 17 two-way  1700 to 1800 9 arrive 14 depart 23 two-way

4.28 The total traffic generation based on the proposed scheme is summarised below:  0800 to 0900 346 arrive 213 depart 559 two-way  1700 to 1800 200 arrive 290 depart 490 two-way

4.29 The total HGV generation based on the proposed scheme is summarised below:  0800 to 0900 2 arrive 2 depart 4 two-way  1700 to 1800 2 arrive 1 depart 3 two-way

4.30 A section of the site to the north eastern perimeter consisting of approximately 0.15 hectares will be allocated for a parking facility for the adjacent railway station. It is understood that this will be secured through a Section 106 agreement.

4.31 The station currently only has a small number of pay and display spaces located to the north of the site. Rail services from this station are widely used and additional spaces is therefore required. Hence, this facility will cater for the existing demand that is currently parking on street in the vicinity of the site and the railway. As a result a separate assessment of the traffic generation of this use is not required at this stage.

4.32 The proposed development also includes new sporting facilities and a social club located off Trent Vale Road. Given that the social club is relocating from its current location within the business park and that the trip generation of the sports facility would be outside of the standard peak hour periods, the trip generation from these uses have not been specifically assessed.

Retail trip breakdown

4.33 As detailed above, it has been agreed with NCC that 30% of the retail trips will be new to the network. The remaining 70% of the trips will comprise of linked and pass-by trips from the existing vehicle traffic on the adjacent highway network. It has therefore been assumed that the 70% of traffic will be evenly split between linked and pass-by trips (35%). The traffic flows for each trip type are detailed in Table 3 below.

Total vehicles HGV Trip type Period arrive depart two-way arrive depart two-way

Retail gross 0800-0900 63 61 124 0 0 0 trips 100% 1700-1800 76 65 141 1 0 1 0800-0900 19 18 37 0 0 0 New trips 30% 1700-1800 23 20 43 0 0 0

Passby trips 0800-0900 22 21 43 0 0 0 35% 1700-1800 27 23 50 0 0 0 0800-0900 22 22 44 0 0 0 Linked trips 35% 1700-1800 26 22 48 1 0 1 Table 3: Retail trip breakdown

23

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Net traffic generation

4.34 The proposed scheme at Beeston Business Park involves the redevelopment of part of the existing site. An assessment has therefore been undertaken to establish the net traffic impact of the proposed development against the current position. This assessment does not take into account the buildings that will be retained. The net difference in trips therefore compares the 40,708sqm that is being redeveloped against the proposed uses. The remaining 24,088sqm of retained use has not been considered in the net traffic generation as this currently generates traffic and could continue to do so without the need for a planning application. The level of traffic associated with the retained use will however be included in any potential junction assessments that would be undertaken.

4.35 A summary of the net difference in total vehicle trips is provided in Table 4 below.

AM Peak (08:00–09:00) PM Peak (17:00–18:00) Scenario arrive depart two-way arrive depart two-way Proposed 346 213 559 200 290 490 Existing 560 149 709 86 414 500 Net Difference -214 +64 -150 +114 -124 -10 Table 4: Summary of net change in vehicle trips for total development

4.36 Table 4 shows that there will be a reduction of 150 and 10 two-way vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hour periods respectively. The proposed scheme therefore represents a less intensive use than the previously consented use. The difference in the arrivals and departures between the proposed and existing uses is due to the different tidal movements and characteristics of the residential and employment traffic.

4.37 It is important to note that this assessment has been based on a robust TRICS assessment of a residential use. Given the nature of the proposed mixed development and the excellent accessibility, the site could generate less traffic than is derived from the assessment. They will also be an element of traffic that will be internalised within the development. These have not been taken into account in this assessment in order to provide a robust assessment.

Person trip generation

4.38 To provide an accurate representation of the forecast modal split anticipated at the proposed development, the journey to work data for the resident and daytime population of the ward within which the site is located in has been reviewed. The site is located within the Beeston Rylands ward and the travel to work data from the 2011 Census has been examined and is summarised in Table 5 below.

24

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Resident population Daytime population Mode Modal Share Modal Share metro, light rail or tram 0.2% 0.1% Train 7.1% 3.2% Bus, minibus or coach 10.5% 5.5% Taxi or minicab 0.3% 0.2% Driving a car or van 52.0% 68.1% Passenger in a car or van 3.5% 6.2% Motorcycle, scooter or moped 1.1% 1.2% Bicycle 9.5% 6.4% On foot 15.3% 8.8% Other 0.5% 0.3% Total 100.0% 100.0% Table 5: Modal splits

4.39 Given the accessibility of the site, the modal shares detailed in Table 5 are considered representative of the proposed site location.

4.40 As detailed above, there is a net reduction in peak hour vehicle movements as a result of the proposed development. This would also result in a corresponding reduction in person trips to and from the development.

25

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

5.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL

Introduction

5.1 Section 2 of this report details the existing opportunities for accessing the site by walking, cycling and public transport and identifies the existing infrastructure that would support the proposed development. Section 4 of this report determined the person trip demand that would be generated by the proposed development.

Opportunities for pedestrian based journeys

5.2 Section 2 of this report details the existing opportunity to travel to and from the site by foot and concludes that the site is accessible to pedestrians.

5.3 The pedestrian desire lines and available footways within the vicinity of the site are shown in Figure 2. This illustrates that the available footways provide direct routes to the centre of Beeston and its associated facilities, bus stops, Beeston Railway Station, local Primary Schools and are all located within a short walk from the site.

5.4 The roads along the desire lines have drop kerb crossing points at all junctions with a signalised crossing at the junction of Queens Road/Station Road. The footways are well maintained and provide the required pedestrian facilities for residents and staff to access and egress the site.

5.5 Footways will also be provided throughout the development to link the site to the existing footway infrastructure along Meadow Road, Trent Road and Trent Vale Road.

5.6 Hence, the existing off-site and proposed on-site infrastructure will be sufficient to allow pedestrians to travel to the development, and therefore no mitigation measures are required.

Opportunities for cycle based journeys

5.7 Section 2 of this report details the existing opportunities to travel to and from the site by cycle. It identified that there are a number of dedicated cycle facilities within the immediate vicinity of the site. These include National Route 6 (NR6), the Greater Nottingham Cycle Route, The Big Track, the Erewash Valley Trail and a number of local links. There is a designated shared cycle and pedestrian footway to the west of the site across Meadow Road.

5.8 The cycle movements associated with the development could therefore be accommodated within the existing highway infrastructure. Secure cycle storage will be provided within the curtilage of each dwelling and through designated cycle parking stands for the employment uses provided as part of the development.

5.9 The availability of the existing cycling infrastructure within the vicinity of Beeston is good. The cycle routes within the 5km isochrone of the site offer traffic free and with traffic sections of routes. The topography of the local area suggests that this would not be a limiting factor in people choosing to cycle. As a result of the above it is concluded that there are good opportunities, with no real physical barriers, for cycle travel between the site and the surrounding areas.

5.10 There is also not sufficient demand for the development to provide additional off site infrastructure, and hence, no off-site improvements should be required.

26

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

Opportunities for public transport based journeys

5.11 The proposed development site benefits from an excellent level of public transport services operating within Beeston and the adjacent areas.

5.12 The site is located adjacent to Beeston Railway Station and benefits from direct pedestrian linkages from the site. This station is served by high frequency services providing direct access to major destinations including, Nottingham, Derby and Burton upon Trent. In addition to this, the site is located within a short walk of high frequency bus services that provide access to the local and wider surrounding areas of the site.

5.13 Further to this, the proposed NET2 tramline extension that routes through Beeston is currently under construction. The addition of the tramline will only further the accessibility credentials of the site.

27

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

Trip distribution

6.1 The trip distribution has been based on the Census travel to work data derived from the Census data for the Beeston Rylands ward. The destinations and origins of the resident and daytime populations for all car driver trips were separated from the data and a percentage demand was derived.

6.2 A summary of the trip distribution for both the resident and daytime population is attached in Appendix H and a summary is provided in Table 6 below.

Resident Daytime Route population population Meadow Road (south) 10.7% 6.3% Queens Road West 3.4% 18.3% Derby Road A52 (west) 24.2% 21.2% Woodside Road 11.9% 16.0% Middleton Boulevard 15.1% 8.9% Derby Road A6200 20.8% 21.4% Queens Drive A453 8.6% 0.5% Clifton Boulevard A52 2.2% 4.5% Clifton Lane A453 2.7% 3.0% Table 6: Summary of vehicle assignment

6.3 These distribution patterns are shown diagrammatically on Figure 11. This distribution was subject to pre-application discussions and has been agreed with NCC.

Traffic assignment

6.4 The employment distribution pattern shown on Figure 11 was used to assign the traffic flows associated with the element of the Business Park that is to be retained and these traffic flows are shown on Figure 12. Similarly the traffic flows associated with the new Business Park development are shown on Figure 13.

6.5 As shown on the masterplan 260 of the proposed 285 dwellings will be located on the main site. The remaining 25 dwellings will be located off South Road adjacent to the sports pitches. The traffic generation from these vehicles would therefore not travel to or from the site access of Meadow Road but instead would be through traffic at this this junction. A summary of the traffic flows associated with the residential dwellings is shown in Figures 14 and 15.

6.6 The assignment of the traffic flows associated with the health centre are shown on Figure 16 and have been based on the employment distribution pattern. As a proxy the employment distribution has also been used to assign the new retail trips and these are shown on Figure 17.

6.7 The assignment of the pass-by trips is shown on Figure 18 and the distribution of these trips has been calculated based on the distribution of the existing traffic flows recorded by the ATC on Meadow Road. The linked retail trips would comprise of trips between the retail uses and the employment and residential uses, and hence would not genesouth roadrate any new movements at the site access or off-site. Hence, these trips have not been included for in the assessment of the site access junction.

28

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

6.8 It is anticipated that the new station car park could comprise of 60 spaces. For the purposes of these assessments it has been assumed that the car park would be in use from 0700 hours and completely utilised at 0900 hours. The spaces would then begin to empty between 1700 and 1900 hours. Hence, it has been assumed that 30 vehicles would arrive during the morning peak hour and depart during the evening peak hour. These trips are shown on Figure 19.

29

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

7.0 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FLOWS AND ASSESSMENT YEAR

Background traffic flows

7.1 As previously stated, it was not possible to undertake any junction counts within the vicinity of the site due to the temporary road works associated with the tram extension.

7.2 It was therefore agreed that the traffic flows could be extracted from the Nottingham Traffic Model. A review of the model however indicated that there were no traffic counts at the site access. The traffic flows from the Queens Road West/Station Road signalised junction are available. However it was not possible to derive the turning movements at the Technology Drive crossroads junction due to the movements associated with Lilac Grove.

7.3 To overcome this, an existing ATC located on Meadow Road, east of Technology Drive was obtained from NCC. The ATC was undertaken between 11/07/2011 – 17/07/2011.

7.4 A previous traffic count undertaken at the Meadow Road/Technology Drive junction in 2007 identified that a minimal number of vehicles turned into or out of the site from the site. Hence, the data from the ATC provides a reasonable proxy of the background traffic flows travelling through the junction and which are not associated with the Business Park. These flows are shown graphically on Figure 20.

7.5 Figure 20 also shows the movements into and out of Laburnum Grove and these were directly extracted from the previous traffic count.

Assessment year

7.6 It was agreed with NCC that any future year assessment would be undertaken to be consistent with the Nottingham Traffic Model. This model uses a future year of 2028 and therefore the junction assessments within this Transport Assessment will model the 2028 flows.

7.7 The flows provided by NCC that were extracted from the model indicated that there was minimal growth (less than 3%) between the two output years (2008 and 2028). To provide a robust assessment a 5% growth has been applied to the base flow figures shown in Figure 20. This level of growth is in excess of the predicted growth in the modelled flows between 2008 and 2028 and therefore represents a worst case assessment. The 2028 base flows are shown on Figure 21.

Total traffic flows

7.8 Figure 22 presents the total traffic flows which are the sum of the following:  2028 background traffic flows,  the flows associated with the retained elements of the Business Park  the proposed development traffic flows  the proposed station car park traffic flows.

30

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

8.0 HIGHWAY IMPACT

Introduction

8.1 It was agreed during pre-application discussions with NCC that if the proposed development resulted in a net reduction in traffic flows, no offsite junctions would have to be assessed. Section 4 indicated that the scheme results in a net reduction of 150 and 10 two-way vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hour periods respectively. Based on this and the discussions with NCC, no off site junctions would be assessed as part of the Transport Assessment.

8.2 The Transport Assessment will therefore assess the site access junction of Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road.

8.3 In terms of the operational assessments of the junction, the industry standard software package PICADY 4.1 has been used for the modelling of the priority controlled junction.

8.4 The geometric parameters have been measured using OS detailed mapping. The traffic capacity analysis has been carried out for the junction specific weekday AM and PM peak periods. The traffic flow scenarios have been modelled using the ‘OD TAB’ input method.

Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road

8.5 This junction has been assessed based on the 2028 future year base flows with the addition of the development generated traffic for the AM and PM peak hour periods. A summary of the results are provided below in Table 7 and the full output is attached at Appendix I. N.B Arm A is Meadow Road, Arm B is Technology Drive, Arm C is Station Road and Arm D is Laburnum Grove.

AM PM

RFC Q RFC Q B-CD 0.540 1.11 0.944 10.3 B-AD 0.283 0.4 0.151 0.2 A-BCD 0.000 0.0 0.005 0.0 D-AB 0.004 0.0 0.004 0.0 D-BC 0.079 0.1 0.015 0.0 C-B 1.246 84.2 0.413 0.7 Table 7: PICADY results Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road

8.6 Table 7 indicates that the Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove crossroads junction operates over capacity in the AM peak for vehicles turning right into Technology Drive from Station Road with a RFC of 1.246. The remaining movements at the junction all operate within capacity.

8.7 During the PM peak hour period, the junction operates below capacity but above the 0.85 threshold that is used as a marker to denote satisfactory operation. This threshold is only exceeded on the minor arm for vehicles exiting the site to Station Road or Meadow Road with an RFC of 0.944.

8.8 Based on this assessment, the existing junction layout would require mitigation in order to accommodate the traffic flows associated with the full development. A detailed review of the options to upgrade the junction has been undertaken and based on the traffic flows, available highway land and geometric constraints it is

31

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

proposed to upgrade the junction to signal control. The proposed road layout is shown on Drawing BMT/2091/100 P1.

8.9 The proposed junction mitigation scheme has been assessed using Linsig for the 2028 future year base flows with the addition of the development generated traffic for the AM and PM peak hour periods and green times and offsets optimised for capacity. A summary of the results are provided below in Table 8 and the full output is attached at Appendix J.

Scenario PRC% Delay (pcuHR) AM Peak (0800 – 0900) 13.9 12.67 PM Peak (0800 – 0900) 51.8 6.8 Table 8: Linsig results Meadow Road/Technology Drive/Laburnum Grove/Station Road

8.10 Table 8 indicates that the proposed junction arrangement operates within capacity for the 2028 AM and PM peak hour periods with the addition of the development generated traffic.

8.11 The proposed mitigation measure is therefore considered suitable to serve the development.

32

LAND AT BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT BMT2091 TA REV 3

9.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

9.1 BWB Consulting Ltd was commissioned by M7 Real Estate Ltd to provide highways and transport advice for the proposed redevelopment of the Beeston Business Park, Beeston Rylands.

9.2 The Applicant seeks planning permission for the following development:  Full planning permission for Industrial/offices (Class B1, B2, and B8), health centre (Class D1), social club (Class D2/A4) and general retail (Class A1), new/replacement sports pitches with ancillary sports club buildings and associated road infrastructure, car parking including a new car park for the Beeston Railway Station.  Outline planning permission for up to 285 residential units including means of access.

9.3 The proposed site is located at Beeston Business Park in Beeston, approximately 4.0km south west of Nottingham City Centre.

9.4 Within the vicinity of the site and Beeston as a whole, there are good levels of pedestrian infrastructure and crossing facilities, proving a safe, convenient and reliable route for pedestrians accessing the site. Given the areas contained within the pedestrian catchment area, and the existing pedestrian infrastructure, it is considered that the site is accessible to pedestrians, and there are good opportunities for pedestrians to walk between the site, public transport services and the local facilities within Beeston.

9.5 A study of accident data demonstrated that there are no particular safety concerns on the highway network surrounding the site that would warrant mitigation as part of the proposed scheme.

9.6 The total level of parking on site will be provided in accordance with the relevant design standards and the number of spaces will be finalised at the detailed design stage. Cycle parking will be provided within the curtilage of each dwelling and at cycle storage points for individual employment units.

9.7 The site will be served via the existing access but will provide a scheme to upgrade the junction to signals. The capacity assessments have indicated that the proposed access arrangements operate well within capacity and can serve the proposed development.

9.8 In addition to this, a tracking assessment has been undertaken using a maximum legal articulated vehicle. This demonstrated that the design vehicle can access and egress the site without any conflicts. The trip distribution and trip generation has been agreed with NCC during pre-application discussions.

9.9 The proposals will result in a net reduction of 150 and 10 two-way vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hour periods respectively. The proposed scheme therefore represents a less intensive use than the previously consented use.

9.10 As a result of the above, the proposed development is in accordance with the objectives contained within NPPF and hence should be acceptable to BBC and NCC.

33

Distribution patterns

Station Road Station Road

Residential main site Employment

89.30%  89.30% 93.70%  93.70%     10.70%  6.30%  Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Technology Drive     10.70%  6.30%   

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Station Road

Residential south site

 89.30%   Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive   89.30%  

Meadow Road

Project Project No. BWB Consulting Ltd BMT2091 35 Livery Street Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham Colmore Business District Title Development traffic distribution Birmingham B3 2PB Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14NTS 11 P1 Business Park to be retained

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 307 Light 47 Light HGV Total HGV 3 Light HGV Total HGV 1 80282 Total 310 0 0 229 1 230  Total 48 0 0 00 0  606 15015 Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0   0 Light 21  0 Light 3  0 HGV 0  0 HGV 0  0 Total 21 0 0 Total 300

Meadow Road Meadow Road 24088

Business Park trips ‐ total vehicles arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 1.375 0.366 1.741 331 88 419 1700‐1800 0.211 1.018 1.229 51 245 296

Business Park trips ‐ HGVs arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 0.013 0.01 0.023 3 2 5 1700‐1800 0.003 0.004 0.007 1 1 2

Project Project No. BWB Consulting Ltd BMT2091 35 Livery Street Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham Colmore Business District Title Retained business park trip assignment Birmingham B3 2PB Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.14.14NTS 12 P1 Business Park development

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 215 Light 33 Light HGV Total HGV 2 Light HGV Total HGV 1 56258 Total 217 0 0 160 1 161  Total 34 0 0 00 0  404 11011 Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0    0 Light 15  0 Light 2  0 HGV 0  0 HGV 0  0 Total 15 0 0 Total 20 0

Meadow Road Meadow Road 16862

Business Park trips ‐ total vehicles arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 1.375 0.366 1.741 232 62 294 1700‐1800 0.211 1.018 1.229 36 172 208

Business Park trips ‐ HGVs arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 0.013 0.01 0.023 2 2 4 1700‐1800 0.003 0.004 0.007 1 1 2

Project Project No. BWB Consulting Ltd BMT2091 35 Livery Street Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham Colmore Business District Title Proposed business park trip assignment Birmingham B3 2PB Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.14.14NTS 13 P1 Residential Main site

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 67 Light 107 Light HGV Total HGV Light HGV Total HGV 105 105  Total 67 0 0 72 72  Total 107 0 0 0  0  13 13  55 Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0   0 Light 8  0 Light 13  0 HGV  0 HGV  0 Total 800 Total 13 0 0

Meadow Road Meadow Road 260

Business Park trips ‐ total vehicles arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 0.287 0.454 0.741 75 118 193 1700‐1800 0.463 0.296 0.759 120 77 197

Project Project No. BWB Consulting Ltd BMT2091 Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Colmore Business District Proposed residential trip assignment (main site) Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14NTS 14 P1 Residential South Road

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 6 Light 11 Light HGV Total HGV Light HGV Total HGV 0  Total 060 0 Total 0110 0  0  0  0  Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0    0 Light 10  0 Light 6  0 HGV  0 HGV  0 Total 0100 Total 06 0

Meadow Road Meadow Road 25

Business Park trips ‐ total vehicles arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 0.287 0.454 0.741 7 11 18 1700‐1800 0.463 0.296 0.759 12 7 19

Project Project No. BMT2091 BWB Consulting Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Proposed residential trip assignment (South Colmore Business District Road) Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB Checked TC Date 01.04.14 NTS 15 P1 TEL: 0121 233 3322 Health centre

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 12 Light 7 Light HGV Total HGV 0 Light HGV Total HGV 1 404 Total 12 0 0 13 0 13  Total 800 00 0  000 101 Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0    0 Light 1  0 Light 1  0 HGV 0  0 HGV 0  0 Total 100 Total 10 0

Meadow Road Meadow Road 464

Business Park trips ‐ total vehicles arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 2.905 0.894 3.799 13 4 17 1700‐1800 1.844 2.961 4.805 9 14 23

Business Park trips ‐ HGVs arrive depart two‐way arrive depart two‐way 0800‐0900 0.056 0.056 0.112 0 0 0 1700‐1800 0.112 0.056 0.168 1 0 1

Project Project No. BWB Consulting Ltd BMT2091 Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Colmore Business District Proposed medical centre trip assignment Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14NTS 16 P1 Retail ‐ new trips

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 18 Light 22 Light HGV Total HGV 0 Light HGV Total HGV 0 17017 Total 18 0 0 19 0 19  Total 22 0 0 0  0  101 101 Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0   0 Light 1  0 Light 1  0 HGV 0  0 HGV 0  0 Total 100 Total 100

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Project Project No. BMT2091 BWB Consulting Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Proposed retail trip assignment Colmore Business District (new trips) Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB NTS 17 P1 TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14 Retail ‐ pass‐by

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 8-8 Light 16 -16 Light HGV Total HGV Light HGV Total HGV 13 13  Total 8-80 9 9 Total 16 -16 0 0  0  88 14 14  Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0   0 Light 14 -14  0 Light 11 -11  0 HGV  0 HGV  0 Total 14 -14 0 Total 11 -11 0

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Meadow Road   AM 163 271 0.376 0.624 PM 268 180 0.598 0.402

Project Project No. BMT2091 BWB Consulting Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Proposed retail trip assignment Colmore Business District Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB NTS 18 P1 TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14 Station car parking

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 30 Light Light HGV Total HGV Light HGV Total HGV 0  Total 30 0 0 30 30  Total 000 0  0  0  0  Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total   0    0 Light  0 Light  0 HGV  0 HGV  0 Total 000 Total 00 0

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Approximately 60 spaces Assume fully occupied by 0900 from 0700 onwards Assume leave between 1700 and 1900

Project Project No. BMT2091 BWB Consulting Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Proposed car park trip assignment Colmore Business District Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB NTS 19 P1 TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14 2011 traffic flows

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 163 2 Light 268 9 Light HGV Total HGV Light HGV Total HGV 0  Total 0 163 2 0  Total 0 268 9 0  0  0  0  Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total  10 10   33 Light 271 0  00 Light 180 2  00 HGV  22 HGV  22 Total 0 271 0 Total 0 180 2

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Meadow Road  AM 163 271 434 PM 268 180 448

Project Project No. BMT2091 BWB Consulting Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Colmore Business District 2011 base flow Birmingham B3 2PB Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev

TEL: 0121 233 3322 NTS 20 P1 Checked TC Date 01.04.14 2028 traffic flows

Station Road Station Road

AM peak PM peak

Light 0 171 2 Light 0 281 9 Light HGV Total HGV 000 Light HGV Total HGV 000 000 Total 0 171 2 0 0 0  Total 0 281 9 000 000 000 000 Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total  11011  303 Light 0 285 0  000 Light 0 189 2  000 HGV 000  202 HGV 000  202 Total 0 285 0 Total 0 189 2

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Growth rates 1.05

Project Project No. BMT2091 BWB Consulting Ltd Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Colmore Business District 2028 base flow Birmingham Drawn JB Approved TC Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14NTS 21 P1 2028 Total development traffic flows

Station Road Station Road

AM peak 0.00755 PM peak 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Light 657 169 2 Light 232 276 9 Light HGV Total HGV 500 Light HGV Total HGV 300 1.4% 275 4 279  Total 662 169 2 0.4% 532 2 534  Total 235 276 9 #DIV/0! 000#DIV/0! 000 0.0% 32 0 32  0.0% 47 0 47  Laburnum Grove A Laburnum Grove C Technology Drive Light HGV Total Technology Drive Light HGV Total  11 0 11 0.0%  3030.0% Light 60 281 0  000#DIV/0! Light 31 184 2  000#DIV/0! HGV 000  2020.0% HGV 000  2020.0% Total 60 281 0 Total 31 184 2 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Meadow Road Meadow Road

2028 Total development traffic flows

PCU factor 2 Station Road Station Road

AM peak 0 PM peak 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

PCU PCU 0.0% 283  PCU 667 169 2 0.0% 536  PCU 238 276 9 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 0  0.0% 32  0.0% 47  Laburnum Grove Laburnum Grove

Technology Drive PCU Technology Drive PCU   11 #DIV/0!   3 #DIV/0!  0 #DIV/0!  0 #DIV/0!  2 #DIV/0!  2 #DIV/0! PCU 60 281 0 PCU 31 184 2 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Meadow Road Meadow Road

Project Project No. BWB Consulting Ltd BMT2091 Land at Beeston Business Park, Nottingham 35 Livery Street Title Colmore Business District 2028 base flow with development Birmingham Drawn Approved Scale Figure Rev B3 2PB JB TC

TEL: 0121 233 3322 Checked TC Date 01.04.14 NTS 22 P1 NOTES

1. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE CHECKED/ VERIFIED ON SITE. IF IN DOUBT 1 2 3 4 ASK.

C A C A C A C A 2. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SPECIALISTS DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

3. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL LEVELS IN METRES UNLESS NOTED E E E E OTHERWISE. J J J J D D D D F F F F 4. ANY DISCREPANCIES NOTED ON SITE ARE TO BE I H I H I H I H REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.

G G G G

KEY

B B B B

1. Junction would operate in four stages with ped movements on the site access and Meadow Road south. 2. Right turn from into the site would be separately signalled and be the 'long lane'. Important to tie in correctly at junction with Lilac Grove. 3. A left turn filter would operate from the site access. 4. Stages 3 would be demand dependant on the ped crossing. 5. It assumed that the site access and and Laburnum Grove could run together with a ped croissing on the site access since no traffic expected from LG to SA. Peds could be protected by a stop line.

Rev Date Details of issue / revision Drw Rev ISSUES & REVISIONS

Birmingham | 0121 233 3322 Leeds | 0113 233 8000 London | 020 7234 9122 Manchester | 0161 233 4260 Nottingham | 0115 924 1100 www.bwbconsulting.com

Client M7 REAL ESTATE LTD

Project Title BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM

Drawing Title PROPOSED JUNCTION LAYOUT

Scale 1:500 Drawn M.Higgins

Size A3 Reviewed T.Cooke

Drawing Status PRELIMINARY

Drawing No. Revision BMT/2091/100 P2 c Copyright BWB Consulting Ltd Scale 1:500 Scale 1:500 NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE CHECKED/ VERIFIED ON SITE. IF IN DOUBT ASK.

2. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SPECIALISTS DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

3. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL LEVELS IN METRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

4. ANY DISCREPANCIES NOTED ON SITE ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.

KEY

13.6 5.79 0.106

0D[ƒ+RUL] 4.5 0D[ƒ9HUW 1.39 2.7 1.4 6.4 1.4 1.4 2.8

Max Legal Articulated Vehicle (16.5m) Overall Length 16.500m Overall Width 2.500m Overall Body Height 3.632m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.396m Max Track Width 2.500m Lock to Lock Time 6.00s Kerb to Kerb Turning Radius 6.870m

Scale 1:1000

Scale 1:500

Rev Date Details of issue / revision Drw Rev ISSUES & REVISIONS

Birmingham | 0121 233 3322 Leeds | 0113 233 8000 London | 020 7234 9122 Manchester | 0161 233 4260 Nottingham | 0115 924 1100 www.bwbconsulting.com

Client M7 REAL ESTATE LTD

Project Title BEESTON BUSINESS PARK, NOTTINGHAM

Drawing Title VEHICLE TRACKING ASSESSMENT

Scale As Shown Drawn T.Gregory

Size A3 Reviewed J.Byrne

Drawing Status PRELIMINARY

Drawing No. Revision BMT/2091/110 P2 c Copyright BWB Consulting Ltd APPENDIX A – MASTERPLAN

APPENDIX B – NET2 TRAMLINE EXTENSION

APPENDIX C – PIA DATA

NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

Full Collision Details Report

DR1640 Beeston area - 01/01/2008 to 30/09/2013 (2013 data is provisional)

Total number of reports = 27

Total number of pages (including this page) = 30

COLLISION STORIES AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED

Note: Where the age of a person is listed as "U/K yrs", this signifies that the age is unknown

ROAD TRAFFIC INJURY COLLISION RECORDS - DISCLAIMER These details are a record of the personal injury collisions reported to the Police. Every endeavour is made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of these records, which have been transcribed from the original Police Reports. The collision data is then entered and held on computer.

Occasions may arise when information from the Police, relevant to a particular collision, may not be available for several months and will therefore not be included.

Contributory Factors reflect the reporting officer's opinion at the time of reporting and may not be the result of extensive investigation.

No liability can be accepted for errors or omissions.

Date: 03-February-2014 Page 1 of 30 VRUs No. 1 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453210 / 336430 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D009708 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 15/01/2008 Day Tuesday Road A6005 Location Station Rd /A6005 Queens Rd Beeston Time 22:28 Reported V1 TRAV NW STATION RD V2 TRAV OPP DIR V1 COMM TN-R /A6005 V2 COLL V1 that Weather Rain Wind Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Dark/lights lit Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 402 Junction restart Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail Crossroads 605 Learner or inexperienced Vehicle 001 Possible Junction Control Automatic traffic signal CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 707 Vision affected: rain/sleet/snow/fog Vehicle 001 Very likely 2nd Road Number B6006 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SLIGHT Age 27 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Nearside Drivers age 17 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Going ahead other Direction from North west to South east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 27 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D009708 Page 2 of 30 VRUs No. 2 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453590 / 335700 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D107508 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Pedestrian Date 14/04/2008 Day Monday Road U Location Trent Ln Beeston O/S Trent Vale School Time 15:20 Reported V1 TRAV NW COLL PED XING C/WAY FROM N/S BET PKD VEHS that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 701 Vision affected: stationary/parked veh(s) Vehicle 001 Very likely Lane markings None None Junction Detail Not at or within 20m of junction Junction Control CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Pedestrian Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre O/T stat.vehicle on its O/S Severity SLIGHT Age 5 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Crossing from drivers nearside Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location In c'way crossing elsewhere Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Ped Direction to North east Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Yes on way to or from school Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 40 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose Taking pupil to/from school

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D107508 Page 3 of 30 VRUs No. 3 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453470 / 336180 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D127408 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 21/05/2008 Day Wednesday Road C165 Location Meadow Rd /Lilac Grove Beeston Time 14:20 Reported BOTH VEH TRAV NW MEADOW RD V2 WTG TN-R/LILAC GROVE V1 COLL R V2 that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 308 Following too close Vehicle 001 Possible None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 404 Failed signal or misleading signal Vehicle 002 Possible Junction Detail T or Staggered junction 408 Sudden braking Vehicle 002 Possible Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Central Refuge only

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Van/Goods < 3.5t Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 39 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 39 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose Journey as part of work Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Van/Goods < 3.5t Manoeuvre Waiting to turn right Direction from South east to North east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Back Drivers age 39 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D127408 Page 4 of 30 VRUs No. 4 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453570 / 335740 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D184508 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 14/06/2008 Day Saturday Road U Location Trent Rd/Trent Vale Rd Beeston Rylands Time 08:44 Reported V1 TRAV E TRENT VALE RD & COMM TN-L COLL V2-P/C TRAV NW TRENT RD that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Turning left Severity SLIGHT Age 78 yrs Sex Male Direction from South west to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age 65 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Going ahead other Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Skidded Yes Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 78 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D184508 Page 5 of 30 VRUs No. 5 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453210 / 336430 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D223808 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SERIOUS SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Pedestrian Date 23/07/2008 Day Wednesday Road A6005 Location A6005 Queens Rd /Station Rd Beeston O/S Co-Op (291) Time 19:02 Reported V1 STATION RD TRAV SE COMM R-TN AT /QUEENS RD COLL C1 (PED) XNG FRM DRVRS O/S that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 806 Pedestrian impaired by alcohol Casualty 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 802 Failed look properly Casualty 001 Very likely Junction Detail Crossroads 804 Wrong use of ped crossing facility Casualty 001 Very likely Junction Control Automatic traffic signal CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number B6006 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Pedestrian Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SERIOUS Age 67 yrs Sex Male Direction from North west to South west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Crossing from drivers offside Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location In c'way crossing on ped crossing facility Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Ped Direction to South east Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 43 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D223808 Page 6 of 30 No. 6 District Broxtowe VRUs Full Collision Details Motorcycle Grid Reference 453520 / 336130 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D264008 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 12/08/2008 Day Tuesday Road U Location Meadow Rd Approx 20M Nw Jn Technology Dr Beeston Rylands Time 11:30 Reported V1 V2 TRAV MEADOW RD V1 STNRY ON N/S PULLS OUT V2 MOPED SWERVES FALLS V1 V2 TRAV NW TWDS TWN CTR that Weather Unknown Road Surface Unknown Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Starting Severity SLIGHT Age 17 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Cleared junction or parked at junction exit Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 48 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type M/cycle <= 50cc Manoeuvre O/T stat.vehicle on its O/S Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Cleared junction or parked at junction exit Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Nearside Drivers age 17 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D264008 Page 7 of 30 VRUs No. 7 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453210 / 336430 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D350408 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 18/12/2008 Day Thursday Road A6005 Location A6005 Queens Rd/Station Rd O/S Co-Op Beeston Time 17:43 Reported V1 TRAV STATION RD NW TWDS TWN CTR GREEN T/LT V2 TRAV OPP DIR WTG TN R QUEENS RD W V2 THEN TN R V1 COLL V2 V2 VIEW ALLGDLY that OBSC BY DRVRS TNG HEAD TO HEAD Weather Rain Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Dark/lights lit Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 104 Inadequate/masked signs/road markings Vehicle 002 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 002 Very likely Junction Detail Crossroads Junction Control Automatic traffic signal CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number B6006 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Passenger Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 1 yrs Sex Female Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? Rear PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 31 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Commuting to/from work Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Car Manoeuvre Turning right Direction from North west to South west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Nearside Drivers age 22 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D350408 Page 8 of 30 VRUs No. 8 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453360 / 336310 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D090109 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 07/04/2009 Day Tuesday Road U Location Station Rd/Waterloo Rd Beeston Time 12:42 Reported V1 TRAV SE STN RD INT AHD AT JN COLL V2-P/C TRAV NE FROM CYCLE PATH MASKED BY PARKED VEH CSG RDR FALL&INJ that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 310 Cyclist enters from pavement Vehicle 002 Very likely Roadworks Lane markings Centre/hazard line 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 002 Very likely Junction Detail T or Staggered junction 602 Careless, reckless or in hurry Vehicle 002 Very likely Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 701 Vision affected: stationary/parked veh(s) Vehicle 002 Very likely 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None 701 Vision affected: stationary/parked veh(s) Vehicle 001 Very likely and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 11 yrs Sex Male Direction from North west to South east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age 73 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Going ahead other Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 11 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D090109 Page 9 of 30 VRUs No. 9 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453210 / 336430 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D147409 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 23/06/2009 Day Tuesday Road A6005 Location A6005 Queens Rd/Station Rd Beeston Time 10:40 Reported V1 V2 TRAV QUEENS RD SW TWDS CHILWELL V1 STPS RED T/LT JN V2 P/C O/T TRAF ON N/S COLL N/S WING MIRROR V1 that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 40 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail Crossroads Junction Control Automatic traffic signal CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number B6006 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Waiting to go ahead but held up Severity SLIGHT Age U/K yrs Sex Female Direction from North east to South west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Nearside Drivers age 42 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose Journey as part of work Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Overtaking on nearside Direction from North east to South west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Veh left carriageway? Left c'way near-side Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age U/K yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D147409 Page 10 of 30 No. 10 District Broxtowe VRUs Full Collision Details Motorcycle Grid Reference 453310 / 336330 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D205509 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SERIOUS SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 13/07/2009 Day Monday Road C165 Location Station Rd/ Barton St Beeston Time 16:40 Reported V1(P/C)& V2(M/C) TRAV SE STATION RD AT/BARTON ST V1 TN-R ACROSS PATH V2 V2 INT CONT AHD & IN PROCESS OF O/T V1 ON O/S that Weather Rain Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 2

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SERIOUS Age 46 yrs Sex Male Direction from North west to South west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded Yes Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Leaving main road Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Cas No 2 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Severity Age yrs Sex Drivers age 46 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No SLIGHT 21 Male Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Journey purpose Journey as part of work Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type M/cycle 50 - 125cc Ped location Not a pedestrian Manoeuvre O/T moving vehicle on its O/S Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Direction from North west to South east Towing? No School Pupil Other Skidded Yes Roadworker injured No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 21 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D205509 Page 11 of 30 VRUs No. 11 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453470 / 336180 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D203209 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 25/08/2009 Day Tuesday Road C165 Location Meadow Rd/Lilac Gr Beeston Time 17:00 Reported V1 TRAV SW LILAC GR AT JN MEADOW RD COMM TN-R ACROSS PTH V2-P/C TRAV SE MEADOW RD V2 COL O/S V1 that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 403 Poor turn or manoeuvre Vehicle 001 Possible None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Possible Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SLIGHT Age 28 yrs Sex Male Direction from North east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age U/K yrs Sex Not traced Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Going ahead other Direction from North west to South east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 28 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D203209 Page 12 of 30 VRUs No. 12 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453500 / 336200 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D207609 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Pedestrian Date 28/08/2009 Day Friday Road C165 Location Lilac Grove O/S no 2(18M Ne/Alford Close Beeston Time 16:30 Reported V1 TRAV NE LILAC GROVE CLR JN AHD O/T VEH PRKD N/S ALGDLY PED ENT C/W XING NW TO SE COLL F V1 that Weather Fine Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Pedestrian Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre O/T stat.vehicle on its O/S Severity SLIGHT Age 6 yrs Sex Male Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Crossing from drivers nearside Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location In c'way crossing elsewhere Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Cleared junction or parked at junction exit Ped Direction to South east Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 70 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D207609 Page 13 of 30 VRUs No. 13 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453170 / 336390 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D254109 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 05/10/2009 Day Monday Road A6005 Location A6005 Queens Rd/Ent D-Way Adj Co-Op (40M Sw Stn Rd) Beeston Time 17:25 Reported V1-P/C EMERGING FROM DRIVEWAY ONTO QUEENS RD COLL V2 TRAV NE ON O/S F/WAY that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 704 Vision affected: buildings/road signs/etc Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail Using private drive or entrance Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 2

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 32 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) Footway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Cas No 2 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Severity Age yrs Sex Drivers age 32 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No SLIGHT 17 Male Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Journey purpose Other/Not known Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Ped location Not a pedestrian Manoeuvre Going ahead other Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Direction from South west to North east Towing? No School Pupil Other Skidded No Roadworker injured No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) Footway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 17 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D254109 Page 14 of 30 VRUs No. 14 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453390 / 336250 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D281609 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 21/10/2009 Day Wednesday Road C165 Location Station Rd (Approx Within 10 M Nw Railway Bridge) Beeston Time 18:30 Reported V3 V2 STNRY IN Q OF TRAFF STATION RD FAC NW V1 TRAV NW STATION RD COLL R V2 PSHNG V2 INTO V3 that Weather Rain Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 308 Following too close Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail Not at or within 20m of junction Junction Control CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 3 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 3

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 37 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Cas No 2 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Severity Age yrs Sex Drivers age 37 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No SLIGHT 32 Female Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Journey purpose Journey as part of work Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Car Ped location Not a pedestrian Manoeuvre Waiting to go ahead but held up Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Direction from South east to North west Towing? No School Pupil Other Skidded No Roadworker injured No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Cas No 3 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 3 Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Severity SLIGHT Age 35 yrs Sex Female Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Hit object in c'way? None Ped Movement Hit object off c'way? None Not a pedestrian First point of impact Back Ped location Not a pedestrian Ped Direction to Drivers age 32 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Not a pedestrian Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative School Pupil Other Journey purpose Journey as part of work Roadworker injured No

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D281609 Page 15 of 30 Veh.No. 3 Vehicle type Car Manoeuvre Waiting to go ahead but held up Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Back Drivers age 35 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D281609 Page 16 of 30 VRUs No. 15 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453470 / 336180 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D309709 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 10/11/2009 Day Tuesday Road C165 Location Meadow Rd/ Lilac Gr Beeston Time 10:02 Reported V1 TRAV SW LILAC GR STNRY AT JN/ MEADOW RD POSS BEG TNG MNVR-R CSNG V2(P/C) & TRAV SE MEADOW RD TO TK AVD ACT & FALL OFF BIKE that (V1 WTG GAP TRAFF) Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number C165 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Waiting to turn right Severity SLIGHT Age 46 yrs Sex Female Direction from North east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 55 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run Yes Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose Commuting to/from work Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Going ahead other Direction from North west to South east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 46 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D309709 Page 17 of 30 VRUs No. 16 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453470 / 336180 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D054010 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 11/03/2010 Day Thursday Road C165 Location Meadow Rd/Lilac Grove Beeston Time 12:25 Reported V1 TRAV SW LILAC GROVE INT TN-R /MEADOW RD V2-P/C TRAV SE MEADOW RD INT GO AHD V1 COMM TN-R COLL FRONT V2 that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 406 Failed judge other person's path or speed Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail T or Staggered junction 302 Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign/markings Vehicle 001 Possible Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 602 Careless, reckless or in hurry Vehicle 001 Possible 2nd Road Number C165 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Central Refuge only

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SLIGHT Age 38 yrs Sex Male Direction from North east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age 22 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Going ahead other Direction from North west to South east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 38 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D054010 Page 18 of 30 VRUs No. 17 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453290 / 336360 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D125210 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 30/05/2010 Day Sunday Road C165 Location Station Rd O/S 209B Aprx 20M Se /Linden Gr Beeston Time 15:25 Reported V1 PKD N/S KRB FAC SE DRVR ALLGDLY MVS OFF BEFORE ALL PSNGRS ARE IN VEH CSNG CAS 1 TO BE PULLED FWD & FALL that Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 509 Distraction in vehicle Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail Other Junction 510 Distraction outside vehicle Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 602 Careless, reckless or in hurry Vehicle 001 Very likely 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Passenger Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Starting Severity SLIGHT Age 84 yrs Sex Female Direction from North west to South east Towing? No Car Passenger? Rear PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Cleared junction or parked at junction exit Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 52 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D125210 Page 19 of 30 VRUs No. 18 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453440 / 336040 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D125410 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 02/06/2010 Day Wednesday Road U Location Grassy Ln 60M Ne /Trent Rd Beeston Rylands Time 21:15 Reported V2-POL VEH ON CALL TRAV NE GRASSY LN COMM PERF U-TN V1-P/C TRAV NE GRASSY LN TRIES TO STP & FALLS FRM P/C & COLL F/O/S V2 WHICH that WAS MIDWAY THRU MNVRE Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 410 Loss of control Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings None 203 Defective brakes Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail Not at or within 20m of junction 602 Careless, reckless or in hurry Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Control CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 10 yrs Sex Male Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 10 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Car Manoeuvre U Turn Direction from South west to South west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 24 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D125410 Page 20 of 30 VRUs No. 19 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453512 / 336216 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D084311 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 11/03/2011 Day Friday Road C165 Location Lilac Grove at House Number 3 , (aprx 4 metres northeast of Alford Close), Beeston Time 08:10 Reported V2 TRAV SE MEADOW RD COMM TN-L LILAC GR ONCOMNG VEH (U/K) CS V2 STP N/S BEH PKD CAR (ALSO U/K) & V1 (P/C) TRAV BEH V2 COLL R V2 that Weather Fog Mist Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 103 Slippery due to weather Vehicle 001 Possible None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 408 Sudden braking Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Stopping Severity SLIGHT Age 48 yrs Sex Male Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Cleared junction or parked at junction exit Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 48 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Commuting to/from work Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Car Manoeuvre Waiting to go ahead but held up Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Cleared junction or parked at junction exit Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Back Drivers age 26 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D084311 Page 21 of 30 VRUs No. 20 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453250 / 336490 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D264911 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 08/09/2011 Day Thursday Road A6005 Location A6005 QUEENS ROAD (LOCATION UNKNOWN), BEESTON Time 09:10 Reported V1 (PSV) A6005 TRAV SW SLOWING DOWN TO STOP AND STANDING PSSNGR FELL OVER ON BUS. LOCATION & DIRECTION OF RTC/VEH UNKNOWN that Weather Unknown Road Surface Unknown Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 408 Sudden braking Vehicle 001 Possible Lane markings Centre/hazard line None Junction Detail Not at or within 20m of junction Junction Control CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Bus or Coach Cas No 1 Cas Class Passenger Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Stopping Severity SLIGHT Age 32 yrs Sex Female Direction from North east to South west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? Standing Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Did not impact Drivers age 34 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D264911 Page 22 of 30 VRUs No. 21 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453146 / 336365 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D221011 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 25/09/2011 Day Sunday Road A6005 Location A6005 QUEENS ROAD at House Number 298, 40 metres southwest of WAVERLEY AVENUE, BEESTON Time 06:59 Reported V1 TRAV NE QUEENS RD, COLLIDING WITH REAR OF V2 (PKD & UNATTENDED) N/S TO KERB FACING NE. COLLISION CAUSES V1 TO FLIP ONTO ITS that ROOF INTO THE CENTRE OF C/W AND V2 ONTO N/S PAVEMENT INTO GARDEN WALL. Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 501 Impaired by alcohol Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 503 Fatigue Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail Not at or within 20m of junction Junction Control CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre O/T stat.vehicle on its O/S Severity SLIGHT Age 23 yrs Sex Female Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded Overturned Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? Parked vehicle unlit Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 23 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Positive Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Van/Goods < 3.5t Manoeuvre Parked Direction from South west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Veh left carriageway? Left c'way near-side Hit object in c'way? Kerb Hit object off c'way? Wall or fence First point of impact Back Drivers age U/K yrs Sex Not traced Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D221011 Page 23 of 30 No. 22 District Broxtowe VRUs Full Collision Details Motorcycle Grid Reference 453209 / 336435 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D065212 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 31/03/2012 Day Saturday Road A6005 Location A6005 QUEENS ROAD, at its Junction with B6006 STATION ROAD, BEESTON Time 04:00 Reported V1 TRAV NW STATION ROAD COMMENCING TO TURN RIGHT (POSSIBLY THROUGH RED LIGHT) ACROSS PATH OF V2 (M/C) TRAV SW QUEENS ROAD that (INTENDING TO TURN-RIGHT ONTO STATION RD). COLLISION CAUSES RIDER V2 TO BE KNOCKED OFF VEH. Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Dark/lights lit Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 404 Failed signal or misleading signal Vehicle 001 Possible None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Possible Junction Detail Crossroads Junction Control Automatic traffic signal CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number B6006 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SLIGHT Age 25 yrs Sex Male Direction from South east to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age U/K yrs Sex Not traced Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run Yes Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type M/cycle <= 50cc Manoeuvre Turning right Direction from North east to North west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Leaving main road Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 25 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not contacted Journey purpose

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D065212 Page 24 of 30 VRUs No. 23 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453260 / 336380 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D112912 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Pedestrian Date 10/04/2012 Day Tuesday Road C165 Location C165 STATION ROAD, at its Junction with Unclassified Road GROVE STREET, BEESTON Time 16:15 Reported V1 STATION ROAD TRAV NW TN-L /GROVE STREET PED SAME ROAD & DIR XING JUNCTION OF GROVE STREET V1 COMM TN-L PED ALLEGEDLY that FAILS TO SEE OR G/WAY & COLLIDES V1 N/S Weather Other Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Possible None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 803 Failed judge vehicle's path/speed Casualty 001 Possible Junction Detail T or Staggered junction 808 Careless, reckless or in hurry Casualty 001 Possible Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 802 Failed look properly Casualty 001 Possible 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Pedestrian Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Turning left Severity SLIGHT Age 65 yrs Sex Female Direction from South east to South west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Crossing from drivers nearside Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location In c'way crossing elsewhere Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Leaving main road Ped Direction to North west Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Nearside Drivers age 47 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not requested Journey purpose

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D112912 Page 25 of 30 VRUs No. 24 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453330 / 336319 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D152112 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 22/06/2012 Day Friday Road C165 Location C165 STATION ROAD, at its Junction with Unclassified Road BARTON STREET, BEESTON Time 14:26 Reported V3 V2 FAC NW STATION ROAD STATIONARY DUE QUEUING TRAFFIC. V1 TRAV NW OVER BROW OF RAILWAY BRIDGE COLLIDED REAR V2 PUSHING that V2 INTO REAR V3 Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 108 Road layout Vehicle 001 Possible None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 703 Vision affected: road layout Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail T or Staggered junction 602 Careless, reckless or in hurry Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and No crossing facility within 50m

VEHICLES INVOLVED 3 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Car Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Stopping Severity SLIGHT Age 49 yrs Sex Female Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded Yes Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 21 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Car Manoeuvre Waiting to go ahead but held up Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Back Drivers age 49 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D152112 Page 26 of 30 Veh.No. 3 Vehicle type Car Manoeuvre Waiting to go ahead but held up Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Approaching or parked on approach to junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Back Drivers age 49 yrs Sex Female Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Other/Not known

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D152112 Page 27 of 30 VRUs No. 25 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453470 / 336177 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D293812 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 13/12/2012 Day Thursday Road C165 Location C165 MEADOW ROAD, at its Junction with Unclassified Road LILAC GROVE, BEESTON Time 10:36 Reported V1 LILAC GR TRAV SW COMM TN-R /MEADOW RD AND COLL O/S/R V2(P/C) FACING NW WTG TN-R AT JNC, CSNG V2 RIDER FALL. that Weather Fine Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 405 Failed look properly Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 706 Vision affected: dazzling sun Vehicle 001 Very likely Junction Detail T or Staggered junction Junction Control Give way sign or uncontrolled CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number U Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Central Refuge only

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Taxi Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Turning right Severity SLIGHT Age 42 yrs Sex Male Direction from North east to North west Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Entering main road Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 40 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Journey as part of work Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Waiting to turn right Direction from South east to North east Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age 42 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D293812 Page 28 of 30 VRUs No. 26 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453197 / 336425 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D046313 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Police Officer Attend: Yes SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Pedestrian Date 22/03/2013 Day Friday Road A6005 Location A6005 QUEENS ROAD, XRDS at its Junction with B6006 STATION ROAD, BEESTON Time 11:57 Reported V1 A6005 TRAV NE OVER XRDS /STATION ROAD. PED SAME ROAD ON XING, XING LIGHTS OUT DUE TO ROAD WORKS. U/K VEH O/SHOT JN, PED that ENTS FROM V1 O/S FM BEH VEH INTO MOVING TRAF ON GREEN LIGHT V1 COLLIDES PED Weather Fine Road Surface Wet Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 104 Inadequate/masked signs/road markings Casualty 001 Very likely Roadworks Lane markings Centre/hazard line 105 Defective traffic signals Casualty 001 Very likely Junction Detail Crossroads 107 Temporary road layout Casualty 001 Very likely Junction Control Automatic traffic signal CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 801 Crossing & masked by stationary/parked veh Casualty 001 Very likely 2nd Road Number B6006 Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None 701 Vision affected: stationary/parked veh(s) Vehicle 001 Very likely and Ped phase at signals

VEHICLES INVOLVED 1 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Taxi Cas No 1 Cas Class Pedestrian Veh ref No 1 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age 38 yrs Sex Male Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Crossing from drivers offside masked Veh location at impact (restricted lane) On main carriageway Ped location In c'way crossing on ped crossing facility Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Mid junction Ped Direction to North west Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured Yes Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age 65 yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 0 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Negative Journey purpose Journey as part of work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D046313 Page 29 of 30 VRUs No. 27 District Broxtowe Full Collision Details Grid Reference 453148 / 336355 SEVERITY Ref.No 2D166813 COLLISION STORY AND CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS ARE FOR THE Pedal Cycle Police Officer Attend: No - reported over the counter SLIGHT SOLE USE OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE AND MUST NOT BE QUOTED Date 23/08/2013 Day Friday Road A6005 Location A6005 QUEENS ROAD O/S NO.18 SOVEREIGN COURT, BEESTON Time 09:45 Reported V1(P/C) COMM EXIT SOVEREIGN CT (FLATS) NW ONTO PVMNT (CF999-ENT PVMNT), V2(P/C) TRAV NE CF999-ALONG PVMNT COLL V1. V2 ALGD NO that BRAKES. Weather Fine Road Surface Dry Street Lighting Light/with lights Speed Limit 30 MPH SITE CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS PARTICIPANT PROBABILITY SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS Carriageway Single c'way DETAILS 999 Other - specified Vehicle 001 Very likely None Lane markings Centre/hazard line 999 Other - specified Vehicle 002 Possible Junction Detail Not at or within 20m of junction Junction Control CARRIAGEWAY HAZARDS 2nd Road Number Pedestrian Facilities No Human control within 50m None and Pelican etc crossing

VEHICLES INVOLVED 2 CASUALTIES INVOLVED 1

Veh.No. 1 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Cas No 1 Cas Class Driver or Rider Veh ref No 2 Manoeuvre Going ahead other Severity SLIGHT Age U/K yrs Sex Male Direction from South west to North east Towing? No Car Passenger? No PSV Passenger? No Skidded No Ped Movement Not a pedestrian Veh location at impact (restricted lane) Footway Ped location Not a pedestrian Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Ped Direction to Not a pedestrian Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way School Pupil Other Hit object in c'way? None Roadworker injured No Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Offside Drivers age U/K yrs Sex Not traced Other veh.hit (ref.no) 2 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Veh.No. 2 Vehicle type Pedal Cycle Manoeuvre Starting Direction from South east to North west Towing? No Skidded No Veh location at impact (restricted lane) Footway Junct. location of veh. at 1st impact Not at junction Veh left carriageway? Did not leave c'way Hit object in c'way? None Hit object off c'way? None First point of impact Front Drivers age U/K yrs Sex Male Other veh.hit (ref.no) 1 Hit and run No Foreign vehicle Not foreign Breath test Not applicable Journey purpose Commuting to/from work

Full Details 03-February-2014 Collision Ref.No 2D166813 Page 30 of 30 APPENDIX D – TRAFFIC COUNTS

18 th December 2013 Queens Road/ Station Road

Junction Turning Movements Queens Road/ Station Road 2008 Base - Turning Movements (pcus/hr)

Morning Evening

Station Road Queens Station Road Queens Road Road

Queens Road Queens Road Station Station Road Road

Page 2 Queens Road/ Station Road 2028 Future Year - Turning Movements (pcus/hr)

Morning Evening

Station Road Queens Station Road Queens Road Road

Queens Road Queens Road Station Station Road Road

Page 3 Weekly Volume Report NOTTS_AIU_SPEED 000050505336: 2011‐07‐11 to 20 Site Name 000050505336 Site ID 000050505336 Grid 453570336070 Description MEADOW ROAD, BEESTON RYLANDS (SE OF TRAFALGER ROAD)

Setup 5336_Class Channel All directions Bins Total Time Period 1 hour Exclude data: None

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat SunAverage Total 11 Jul 12 Jul 13 Jul 14 Jul 15 Jul 16 Jul 17 Jul Workday 7 Day Count 00:00 16 31 17 22 26 64 76 22 36 252 01:00 17 7 8 10 17 39 46 12 21 144 02:00 14 5 11 19 23 30 36 14 20 138 03:00 776911151681071 04:00 8 13 12 17 14 31 22 13 17 117 05:00 45 44 37 38 42 25 14 41 35 245 06:00 99 124 115 110 117 61 45 113 96 671 07:00 244 261 256 265 266 23 55 258 196 1370 08:00 427 422 439 434 448 14 116 434 329 2300 09:00 353 319 334 352 347 30 222 341 280 1957 10:00 302 276 268 314 298 66 315 292 263 1839 11:00 283 291 303 303 334 192 412 303 303 2118 12:00 336 322 342 326 323 321 419 330 341 2389 13:00 335 301 303 380 392 438 407 342 365 2556 14:00 305 263 309 310 359 460 416 309 346 2422 15:00 439 444 422 449 521 439 315 455 433 3029 16:00 404 376 392 390 413 405 332 395 387 2712 17:00 425 400 491 435 488 380 271 448 413 2890 18:00 413 419 439 478 458 364 214 441 398 2785 19:00 381 329 422 416 376 291 242 385 351 2457 20:00 244 246 238 311 243 236 166 256 241 1684 21:00 166 232 214 283 167 191 124 212 197 1377 22:00 118 140 168 183 150 138 97 152 142 994 23:00 58 56 67 69 107 96 60 71 73 513

07‐19 4266 4094 4298 4436 4647 3132 3494 4348 4054 28367 06‐22 5156 5025 5287 5556 5550 3911 4071 5314 4939 34556 06‐24 5332 5221 5522 5808 5807 4145 4228 5537 5154 36063 00‐24 5439 5328 5613 5923 5940 4349 4438 5647 5293 37030 am Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 08:00 Peak Volume 427 422 439 434 448 192 412 434 329 pm Peak 15:00 15:00 17:00 18:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 Peak Volume 439 444 491 478 521 460 419 455 433

Data prepared by Drakewell Cloud Hosting (Powered by C2‐WEB) January 15, 2014 1:39:11 PM.

C2‐WebReports ©2003‐2013 Drakewell Computer Systems. Weekly Volume Report NOTTS_AIU_SPEED 000050505336: 2011‐07‐11 to 20 Site Name 000050505336 Site ID 000050505336 Grid 453570336070 Description MEADOW ROAD, BEESTON RYLANDS (SE OF TRAFALGER ROAD)

Setup 5336_Class Channel Southeastbound Bins Total Time Period 1 hour Exclude data: None

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat SunAverage Total 11 Jul 12 Jul 13 Jul 14 Jul 15 Jul 16 Jul 17 Jul Workday 7 Day Count 00:00 11 22 9 14 15 41 34 14 21 146 01:00 633510213551283 02:00 8 2 7 11 15 20 4 9 10 67 03:00 4346575 4534 04:00 13456132 4534 05:00 9 6 6 10 9 5 1 8 7 46 06:00 20 36 35 29 32 24 3 30 26 179 07:00 69 68 76 77 70 9 4 72 53 373 08:00 171 161 164 159 160 3 10 163 118 828 09:00 123 120 141 147 133 2 25 133 99 691 10:00 154 136 113 157 137 19 53 139 110 769 11:00 157 153 157 158 178 19 69 161 127 891 12:00 181 171 148 177 173 113 80 170 149 1043 13:00 154 152 143 181 207 66 70 167 139 973 14:00 152 130 178 174 195 286 359 166 211 1474 15:00 224 228 219 213 259 175 177 229 214 1495 16:00 226 217 228 232 244 102 183 229 205 1432 17:00 260 251 290 270 269 105 145 268 227 1590 18:00 245 240 250 268 225 42 111 246 197 1381 19:00 199 172 225 231 213 31 126 208 171 1197 20:00 128 136 115 148 113 37 102 128 111 779 21:00 97 120 98 140 94 70 69 110 98 688 22:00 70 79 86 92 78 64 64 81 76 533 23:00 33 35 46 41 60 46 39 43 43 300

07‐19 2116 2027 2107 2213 2250 941 1286 2143 1849 12940 06‐22 2560 2491 2580 2761 2702 1103 1586 2619 2255 15783 06‐24 2663 2605 2712 2894 2840 1213 1689 2743 2374 16616 00‐24 2702 2644 2745 2945 2900 1320 1770 2787 2434 17026 am Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 00:00 11:00 08:00 11:00 Peak Volume 171 161 164 159 178 41 69 163 127 pm Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 17:00 17:00 Peak Volume 260 251 290 270 269 286 359 268 227

Data prepared by Drakewell Cloud Hosting (Powered by C2‐WEB) January 15, 2014 1:39:31 PM.

C2‐WebReports ©2003‐2013 Drakewell Computer Systems. Weekly Volume Report NOTTS_AIU_SPEED 000050505336: 2011‐07‐11 to 20 Site Name 000050505336 Site ID 000050505336 Grid 453570336070 Description MEADOW ROAD, BEESTON RYLANDS (SE OF TRAFALGER ROAD)

Setup 5336_Class Channel Northwestbound Bins Total Time Period 1 hour Exclude data: None

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat SunAverage Total 11 Jul 12 Jul 13 Jul 14 Jul 15 Jul 16 Jul 17 Jul Workday 7 Day Count 00:00 5988112342815106 01:00 11 455718116961 02:00 63488103261071 03:00 342368114537 04:00 7 10 8 12 8 18 20 9 12 83 05:00 36 38 31 28 33 20 13 33 28 199 06:00 79 88 80 81 85 37 42 83 70 492 07:00 175 193 180 188 196 14 51 186 142 997 08:00 256 261 275 275 288 11 106 271 210 1472 09:00 230 199 193 205 214 28 197 208 181 1266 10:00 148 140 155 157 161 47 262 152 153 1070 11:00 126 138 146 145 156 173 343 142 175 1227 12:00 155 151 194 149 150 208 339 160 192 1346 13:00 181 149 160 199 185 372 337 175 226 1583 14:00 153 133 131 136 164 174 57 143 135 948 15:00 215 216 203 236 262 264 138 226 219 1534 16:00 178 159 164 158 169 303 149 166 183 1280 17:00 165 149 201 165 219 275 126 180 186 1300 18:00 168 179 189 210 233 322 103 196 201 1404 19:00 182 157 197 185 163 260 116 177 180 1260 20:00 116 110 123 163 130 199 64 128 129 905 21:00 69 112 116 143 73 121 55 103 98 689 22:00 48 61 82 91 72 74 33 71 66 461 23:00 25 21 21 28 47 50 21 28 30 213

07‐19 2150 2067 2191 2223 2397 2191 2208 2205 2203 15427 06‐22 2596 2534 2707 2795 2848 2808 2485 2696 2680 18773 06‐24 2669 2616 2810 2914 2967 2932 2539 2795 2776 19447 00‐24 2737 2684 2868 2978 3040 3029 2668 2861 2855 20004 am Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 08:00 Peak Volume 256 261 275 275 288 173 343 271 210 pm Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 12:00 15:00 13:00 Peak Volume 215 216 203 236 262 372 339 226 226

Data prepared by Drakewell Cloud Hosting (Powered by C2‐WEB) January 15, 2014 1:39:45 PM.

C2‐WebReports ©2003‐2013 Drakewell Computer Systems. APPENDIX E – BEESTON PLANS TAKEN FROM THE LOCAL PLAN

C E D A R A V D E A N O U R M E A Y R E L N E B ID N S D O S R L O E U IG G H H T R E G O E A R R A T D T D S E E N E N O R S IS T N S E N W D TO N O LI L C T L EE A R T T O S N N O R T O LE D A ID D M

M O D N T E E R T E B A T R Y G E T D U E S S A E R T O T N R R S S O E T I E H N B T IG R TO L H E H A E G T U O BR RC5

T E E T R E T E S R LD B T IE R S F A N M E C O T T E E R R E S V E O R S IL G A T O L E D S R A N K C S T R T S A R T T S P E O E T E N E R T E E D Y R E A T T RC5 S S O T R R D T E N R E A A T L U T C N S4 R IT O Y D P R A O O A R D H IG H E U N E W V IL A L T6

W O T N E O U E O G R L N H T L R B S A E Y N T V O D O S T E T IF V N R L E C O R E N O T S A H D I Y R T E I A C T V E E E E N H R T T U M S E il E l Y B a E r U L d N G IO N S TR E E T C E F T R L O E O M S E M A T R W V E T R S E E A L N A C E L U V S1 A L E R E N D C D O U A IA ID E O A C E W M D A R A L H S2a L K P IG H H D IS E D V N E O V N A S C H T E IR E E R A T6 T D S V A E E S G N T O A U A R R E T IN A IO V IC R E3 V E4 N R A O M A IM D P T E EE R TR IA S S L U R B HE R N ET O IO N A T D A T S4S RC5 T E E E R L T M S N A S O V T T E Y N E E E U R IR U U N IN N E E G V C E A V H S A E T L U L T R IA S R E A E C

R D T10e E C T P W A H E IM O N S

R T

R

L E L H E E A W T R L C I O H U C R E28 T S S T T D R A A T O E I R E O D T N O R O O W A R ET D E RE V ST IL E S DL T ID M H E A E L L CO R A L T M LI N S R S G TR R O E E3A E4 H E N A T T G D E E C E T R A R T E VE S N U N E U O H T R E W T C C E O N S L E L I N N O G T T S E O D U N N A E S L V T IM G A R D D E P N E E R W T R E A IA T W A S T V L E S R E E O W W R A L D E Y

D A P O V A V E R E N K C U

R O E O T A E D T L E A E N R T E S S C E O N T O T T D A S V D A E A O FT N L R O U G L R E L C E LL E A W V H IL H O C R G IS L L D E N

E

T6 T

S

E W E28

APPENDIX F – EXISTING USE – TRICS DATABASE

TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 02 - EMPLOYMENT Category : B - BUSINESS PARK VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST HC HAMPSHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH TW TYNE & WEAR 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 77513 to 121275 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 60000 to 121275 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 09/10/08

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Thursday 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 2 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Edge of Town 2

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Commercial Zone 1 No Sub Category 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: B 1 2 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 1 mile: 10,001 to 15,000 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 125,001 to 250,000 1 days 250,001 to 500,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 1 days 1.6 to 2.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: Yes 2 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 HC-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK HAMPSHIRE CROCKFORD LANE CHINEHAM BUSINESS PARK BASINGSTOKE Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 121275 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 22/11/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 TW-02-B-03 BUSINESS PARK TYNE & WEAR CITY WAY EAST HERRINGTON SUNDERLAND Edge of Town No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 7 7 5 1 3 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 09/10/08 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/B - BUSINESS PARK VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 08:00-09:00 Under 6 Surveys Included, 15th/85th Percentile Not Highlighted

Median Values Arrivals: 1.574 Departures: 0.317 Totals: 1.891

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 TW-02-B-03 BUSINESS PARK SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR 77513 Thu 09/10/08 1.773 0.267 2.040 Yes 2 HC-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK BASINGSTOKE HAMPSHIRE 121275 Thu 22/11/07 1.375 0.366 1.741 Yes

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/B - BUSINESS PARK VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 17:00-18:00 Under 6 Surveys Included, 15th/85th Percentile Not Highlighted

Median Values Arrivals: 0.220 Departures: 1.289 Totals: 1.509

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 TW-02-B-03 BUSINESS PARK SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR 77513 Thu 09/10/08 0.228 1.560 1.788 Yes 2 HC-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK BASINGSTOKE HAMPSHIRE 121275 Thu 22/11/07 0.211 1.018 1.229 Yes

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/B - BUSINESS PARK VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 07:00-19:00 Under 6 Surveys Included, 15th/85th Percentile Not Highlighted

Median Values Arrivals: 5.370 Departures: 5.238 Totals: 10.607

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 TW-02-B-03 BUSINESS PARK SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR 77513 Thu 09/10/08 6.169 6.017 12.186 Yes 2 HC-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK BASINGSTOKE HAMPSHIRE 121275 Thu 22/11/07 4.571 4.458 9.029 Yes

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 02 - EMPLOYMENT Category : B - BUSINESS PARK VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST HC HAMPSHIRE 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 121275 to 121275 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 60000 to 121275 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 09/10/08

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Thursday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 1 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Edge of Town 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Commercial Zone 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: B 1 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Filtering Stage 3 selection (Cont.):

Population within 1 mile: 10,001 to 15,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 125,001 to 250,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 1.6 to 2.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: Yes 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 HC-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK HAMPSHIRE CROCKFORD LANE CHINEHAM BUSINESS PARK BASINGSTOKE Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 121275 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 22/11/07 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection TW-02-B-03 - TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/B - BUSINESS PARK VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 00:30 00:30 - 01:00 01:00 - 01:30 01:30 - 02:00 02:00 - 02:30 02:30 - 03:00 03:00 - 03:30 03:30 - 04:00 04:00 - 04:30 04:30 - 05:00 05:00 - 05:30 05:30 - 06:00 06:00 - 06:30 06:30 - 07:00 07:00 - 07:30 1 121275 0.140 1 121275 0.046 1 121275 0.186 07:30 - 08:00 1 121275 0.330 1 121275 0.092 1 121275 0.422 08:00 - 08:30 1 121275 0.616 1 121275 0.161 1 121275 0.777 08:30 - 09:00 1 121275 0.759 1 121275 0.205 1 121275 0.964 09:00 - 09:30 1 121275 0.352 1 121275 0.064 1 121275 0.416 09:30 - 10:00 1 121275 0.220 1 121275 0.073 1 121275 0.293 10:00 - 10:30 1 121275 0.139 1 121275 0.088 1 121275 0.227 10:30 - 11:00 1 121275 0.095 1 121275 0.096 1 121275 0.191 11:00 - 11:30 1 121275 0.088 1 121275 0.075 1 121275 0.163 11:30 - 12:00 1 121275 0.084 1 121275 0.082 1 121275 0.166 12:00 - 12:30 1 121275 0.122 1 121275 0.228 1 121275 0.350 12:30 - 13:00 1 121275 0.197 1 121275 0.200 1 121275 0.397 13:00 - 13:30 1 121275 0.221 1 121275 0.227 1 121275 0.448 13:30 - 14:00 1 121275 0.253 1 121275 0.152 1 121275 0.405 14:00 - 14:30 1 121275 0.103 1 121275 0.125 1 121275 0.228 14:30 - 15:00 1 121275 0.097 1 121275 0.115 1 121275 0.212 15:00 - 15:30 1 121275 0.087 1 121275 0.121 1 121275 0.208 15:30 - 16:00 1 121275 0.079 1 121275 0.147 1 121275 0.226 16:00 - 16:30 1 121275 0.088 1 121275 0.256 1 121275 0.344 16:30 - 17:00 1 121275 0.097 1 121275 0.358 1 121275 0.455 17:00 - 17:30 1 121275 0.095 1 121275 0.541 1 121275 0.636 17:30 - 18:00 1 121275 0.116 1 121275 0.477 1 121275 0.593 18:00 - 18:30 1 121275 0.096 1 121275 0.344 1 121275 0.440 18:30 - 19:00 1 121275 0.095 1 121275 0.186 1 121275 0.281 19:00 - 19:30 19:30 - 20:00 20:00 - 20:30 20:30 - 21:00 21:00 - 21:30 21:30 - 22:00 22:00 - 22:30 22:30 - 23:00 23:00 - 23:30 23:30 - 24:00 Total Rates: 4.569 4.459 9.028

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 121275 - 121275 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/05 - 09/10/08 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 8 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/B - BUSINESS PARK OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 00:30 00:30 - 01:00 01:00 - 01:30 01:30 - 02:00 02:00 - 02:30 02:30 - 03:00 03:00 - 03:30 03:30 - 04:00 04:00 - 04:30 04:30 - 05:00 05:00 - 05:30 05:30 - 06:00 06:00 - 06:30 06:30 - 07:00 07:00 - 07:30 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.005 07:30 - 08:00 1 121275 0.001 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.003 08:00 - 08:30 1 121275 0.008 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.011 08:30 - 09:00 1 121275 0.005 1 121275 0.007 1 121275 0.012 09:00 - 09:30 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.004 09:30 - 10:00 1 121275 0.004 1 121275 0.004 1 121275 0.008 10:00 - 10:30 1 121275 0.006 1 121275 0.005 1 121275 0.011 10:30 - 11:00 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.007 1 121275 0.009 11:00 - 11:30 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.006 11:30 - 12:00 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.004 12:00 - 12:30 1 121275 0.005 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.007 12:30 - 13:00 1 121275 0.004 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.007 13:00 - 13:30 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.005 1 121275 0.008 13:30 - 14:00 1 121275 0.004 1 121275 0.004 1 121275 0.008 14:00 - 14:30 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.004 14:30 - 15:00 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.004 15:00 - 15:30 1 121275 0.005 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.008 15:30 - 16:00 1 121275 0.001 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.004 16:00 - 16:30 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.005 16:30 - 17:00 1 121275 0.003 1 121275 0.001 1 121275 0.004 17:00 - 17:30 1 121275 0.001 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.003 17:30 - 18:00 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.002 1 121275 0.004 18:00 - 18:30 1 121275 0.000 1 121275 0.000 1 121275 0.000 18:30 - 19:00 1 121275 0.001 1 121275 0.001 1 121275 0.002 19:00 - 19:30 19:30 - 20:00 20:00 - 20:30 20:30 - 21:00 21:00 - 21:30 21:30 - 22:00 22:00 - 22:30 22:30 - 23:00 23:00 - 23:30 23:30 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.072 0.069 0.141

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 02/10/13 Page 9 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 121275 - 121275 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/05 - 09/10/08 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST EX ESSEX 1 days HC HAMPSHIRE 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST GS GLOUCESTERSHIRE 1 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE 1 days LE LEICESTERSHIRE 1 days NR NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 1 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS SH SHROPSHIRE 1 days WM WEST MIDLANDS 2 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 08 NORTH WEST LC LANCASHIRE 1 days MS MERSEYSIDE 1 days 09 NORTH TW TYNE & WEAR 2 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 515 to 1890 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 500 to 4000 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 21/11/12

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 2 days Tuesday 4 days Wednesday 5 days Thursday 2 days Friday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 14 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 3 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 9

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Commercial Zone 1 Residential Zone 13 APPENDIX G – PROPOSED USE – TRICS DATABASE

TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST EX ESSEX 1 days HC HAMPSHIRE 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST GS GLOUCESTERSHIRE 1 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE 1 days LE LEICESTERSHIRE 1 days NR NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 1 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS SH SHROPSHIRE 1 days WM WEST MIDLANDS 2 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 08 NORTH WEST LC LANCASHIRE 1 days MS MERSEYSIDE 1 days 09 NORTH TW TYNE & WEAR 2 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 515 to 1890 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 500 to 4000 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 21/11/12

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 2 days Tuesday 4 days Wednesday 5 days Thursday 2 days Friday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 14 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 3 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 9

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Commercial Zone 1 Residential Zone 13 TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: Not Known 1 days A 1 9 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 1 mile: 5,001 to 10,000 2 days 10,001 to 15,000 2 days 15,001 to 20,000 5 days 20,001 to 25,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 4 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 25,001 to 50,000 2 days 75,001 to 100,000 1 days 100,001 to 125,000 1 days 125,001 to 250,000 5 days 250,001 to 500,000 5 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 7 days 1.1 to 1.5 7 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Petrol filling station: Included in the survey count 0 days Excluded from count or no filling station 14 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that include petrol filling station activity, and the number of surveys that do not.

Travel Plan: No 14 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 DS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS DERBYSHIRE STONELOW ROAD HOLMESDALE DRONFIELD Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 1 3 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 21/06/06 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 EX-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS ESSEX PYRLES LANE

LOUGHTON Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 6 5 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 22/11/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 GS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS GLOUCESTERSHIRE SALISBURY AVENUE WARDEN HILL CHELTENHAM Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 2 5 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 26/04/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 HC-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS HAMPSHIRE OLIVER'S BATTERY ROAD S. OLIVERS BATTERY WINCHESTER Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 6 0 5 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 20/11/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 LC-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LANCASHIRE TALBOT ROW E U X T O N NEAR CHORLEY Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 7 2 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 17/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 LE-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LEICESTERSHIRE RYDER ROAD BRAUNSTONE FRITH LEICESTER Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 6 0 6 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 26/09/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 MS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS MERSEYSIDE HUNTS CROSS AVENUE

LIVERPOOL Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 8 9 0 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 18/10/05 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

8 NR-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NORTHAMPTONSHIRE OCCUPATION ROAD

CORBY Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 7 5 5 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 19/11/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 9 NY-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NORTH YORKSHIRE NEWLANDS PARK DRIVE

SCARBOROUGH Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 2 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 28/09/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 10 SH-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS SHROPSHIRE WREKIN DRIVE DONNINGTON TELFORD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 8 2 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 24/06/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 11 TW-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS TYNE & WEAR FARRINGDON ROAD MARDEN NORTH SHIELDS Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 8 5 0 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 17/10/06 Survey Type: MANUAL 12 TW-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS TYNE & WEAR DURHAM ROAD BARNES PARK SUNDERLAND Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 4 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 21/11/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 13 WM-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS WEST MIDLANDS HOLYHEAD ROAD

COVENTRY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 5 5 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 27/09/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 14 WM-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS WEST MIDLANDS MARSHALL LAKE ROAD SHIRLEY SOLIHULL Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 1 5 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 18/09/07 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 08:00-09:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 12 85th Percentile = No. 3

Median Values Arrivals: 3.811 Departures: 3.308 Totals: 7.119

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 NR-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS CORBY NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 755 Wed 19/11/08 10.199 8.874 19.073 2 EX-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LOUGHTON ESSEX 650 Thu 22/11/07 8.154 8.000 16.154 3 DS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS DRONFIELD DERBYSHIRE 1130 Wed 21/06/06 8.142 7.434 15.576 4 LE-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LEICESTER LEICESTERSHIRE 606 Wed 26/09/12 7.591 7.261 14.852 5 NY-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS SCARBOROUGH NORTH YORKSHIRE 1200 Fri 28/09/07 6.833 6.750 13.583 6 GS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS CHELTENHAM GLOUCESTERSHIRE 525 Mon 26/04/10 4.190 4.571 8.761 7 TW-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR 540 Wed 21/11/12 4.074 3.519 7.593 8 WM-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS COVENTRY WEST MIDLANDS 1550 Thu 27/09/07 3.548 3.097 6.645 9 MS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LIVERPOOL MERSEYSIDE 1890 Tue 18/10/05 1.799 2.169 3.968 10 HC-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS WINCHESTER HAMPSHIRE 1605 Tue 20/11/07 1.620 1.620 3.240 11 TW-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NORTH SHIELDS TYNE & WEAR 850 Tue 17/10/06 1.412 1.647 3.059 12 SH-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS TELFORD SHROPSHIRE 820 Wed 24/06/09 1.220 0.732 1.952 13 LC-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NEAR CHORLEY LANCASHIRE 720 Mon 17/10/11 0.972 0.694 1.666 14 WM-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS SOLIHULL WEST MIDLANDS 515 Tue 18/09/07 0.000 0.000 0.000

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 17:00-18:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 12 85th Percentile = No. 3

Median Values Arrivals: 4.514 Departures: 3.936 Totals: 8.450

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 NY-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS SCARBOROUGH NORTH YORKSHIRE 1200 Fri 28/09/07 9.500 11.167 20.667 2 DS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS DRONFIELD DERBYSHIRE 1130 Wed 21/06/06 10.000 9.735 19.735 3 LE-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LEICESTER LEICESTERSHIRE 606 Wed 26/09/12 9.076 7.756 16.832 4 NR-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS CORBY NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 755 Wed 19/11/08 7.682 8.742 16.424 5 EX-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LOUGHTON ESSEX 650 Thu 22/11/07 5.077 5.231 10.308 6 TW-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR 540 Wed 21/11/12 3.333 5.926 9.259 7 WM-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS COVENTRY WEST MIDLANDS 1550 Thu 27/09/07 4.839 3.871 8.710 8 GS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS CHELTENHAM GLOUCESTERSHIRE 525 Mon 26/04/10 4.190 4.000 8.190 9 MS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LIVERPOOL MERSEYSIDE 1890 Tue 18/10/05 2.540 2.169 4.709 10 HC-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS WINCHESTER HAMPSHIRE 1605 Tue 20/11/07 2.243 2.430 4.673 11 LC-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NEAR CHORLEY LANCASHIRE 720 Mon 17/10/11 2.500 2.083 4.583 12 WM-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS SOLIHULL WEST MIDLANDS 515 Tue 18/09/07 1.942 1.942 3.884 13 TW-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NORTH SHIELDS TYNE & WEAR 850 Tue 17/10/06 1.647 1.176 2.823 14 SH-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS TELFORD SHROPSHIRE 820 Wed 24/06/09 1.098 1.585 2.683

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 07:00-19:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 12 85th Percentile = No. 3

Median Values Arrivals: 49.129 Departures: 48.069 Totals: 97.198

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 DS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS DRONFIELD DERBYSHIRE 1130 Wed 21/06/06 110.442 107.345 217.787 2 NY-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS SCARBOROUGH NORTH YORKSHIRE 1200 Fri 28/09/07 93.833 92.333 186.166 3 NR-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS CORBY NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 755 Wed 19/11/08 90.993 91.126 182.119 4 LE-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LEICESTER LEICESTERSHIRE 606 Wed 26/09/12 77.063 76.238 153.301 5 EX-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LOUGHTON ESSEX 650 Thu 22/11/07 73.846 75.077 148.923 6 GS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS CHELTENHAM GLOUCESTERSHIRE 525 Mon 26/04/10 60.381 58.857 119.238 7 WM-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS COVENTRY WEST MIDLANDS 1550 Thu 27/09/07 52.516 52.065 104.581 8 TW-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR 540 Wed 21/11/12 45.741 44.074 89.815 9 LC-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NEAR CHORLEY LANCASHIRE 720 Mon 17/10/11 30.278 28.472 58.750 10 HC-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS WINCHESTER HAMPSHIRE 1605 Tue 20/11/07 28.847 28.847 57.694 11 TW-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS NORTH SHIELDS TYNE & WEAR 850 Tue 17/10/06 20.118 20.118 40.236 12 MS-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LIVERPOOL MERSEYSIDE 1890 Tue 18/10/05 18.201 18.519 36.720 13 SH-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS TELFORD SHROPSHIRE 820 Wed 24/06/09 18.293 17.439 35.732 14 WM-01-I-02 LOCAL SHOPS SOLIHULL WEST MIDLANDS 515 Tue 18/09/07 16.893 16.505 33.398

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 05 EAST MIDLANDS LE LEICESTERSHIRE 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 606 to 606 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 500 to 4000 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 21/11/12

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Wednesday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 1 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Edge of Town 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Residential Zone 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class:

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Filtering Stage 3 selection (Cont.):

Population within 1 mile: 25,001 to 50,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 250,001 to 500,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Petrol filling station: Included in the survey count 0 days Excluded from count or no filling station 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that include petrol filling station activity, and the number of surveys that do not.

Travel Plan: No 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 LE-01-I-01 LOCAL SHOPS LEICESTERSHIRE RYDER ROAD BRAUNSTONE FRITH LEICESTER Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 6 0 6 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 26/09/12 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection DS-01-I-01 - EX-01-I-01 - GS-01-I-01 - HC-01-I-02 - LC-01-I-01 - MS-01-I-01 - NR-01-I-01 - NY-01-I-01 - SH-01-I-01 - TW-01-I-01 - TW-01-I-02 - WM-01-I-01 - WM-01-I-02 - TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 606 6.436 1 606 6.766 1 606 13.202 08:00 - 09:00 1 606 7.591 1 606 7.261 1 606 14.852 09:00 - 10:00 1 606 6.436 1 606 5.941 1 606 12.377 10:00 - 11:00 1 606 4.290 1 606 4.290 1 606 8.580 11:00 - 12:00 1 606 3.135 1 606 3.630 1 606 6.765 12:00 - 13:00 1 606 9.571 1 606 8.746 1 606 18.317 13:00 - 14:00 1 606 3.795 1 606 5.281 1 606 9.076 14:00 - 15:00 1 606 4.290 1 606 2.970 1 606 7.260 15:00 - 16:00 1 606 4.950 1 606 5.446 1 606 10.396 16:00 - 17:00 1 606 7.756 1 606 8.251 1 606 16.007 17:00 - 18:00 1 606 9.076 1 606 7.756 1 606 16.832 18:00 - 19:00 1 606 9.736 1 606 9.901 1 606 19.637 19:00 - 20:00 1 606 9.571 1 606 7.261 1 606 16.832 20:00 - 21:00 1 606 4.785 1 606 6.601 1 606 11.386 21:00 - 22:00 1 606 4.290 1 606 4.455 1 606 8.745 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 9 5.708 9 4.556 190.264

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 606 - 606 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/05 - 21/11/12 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 13

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Monday 04/11/13 Page 6 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/I - SHOPPING CENTRE - LOCAL SHOPS OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.330 08:00 - 09:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.330 10:00 - 11:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.165 14:00 - 15:00 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.330 1 606 0.495 15:00 - 16:00 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.330 16:00 - 17:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.165 18:00 - 19:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.165 1 606 0.165 19:00 - 20:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 1 606 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.990 0.990 1.980

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 606 - 606 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/05 - 21/11/12 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 13

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 05 - HEALTH Category : E - CLINICS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 03 SOUTH WEST CW CORNWALL 1 days DC DORSET 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA CA CAMBRIDGESHIRE 1 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE 1 days LN LINCOLNSHIRE 2 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS WO WORCESTERSHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH TW TYNE & WEAR 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 75 to 1790 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 75 to 1790 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/03 to 10/06/13

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 2 days Tuesday 2 days Wednesday 2 days Thursday 1 days Friday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 8 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Town Centre 1 Edge of Town Centre 4 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Residential Zone 3 Built-Up Zone 1 No Sub Category 4 TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: C 3 1 days D 1 7 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 1 mile: 1,001 to 5,000 3 days 5,001 to 10,000 2 days 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 20,001 to 25,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 5,001 to 25,000 2 days 25,001 to 50,000 2 days 50,001 to 75,000 1 days 75,001 to 100,000 2 days 125,001 to 250,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 1 days 1.1 to 1.5 7 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 8 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 CA-05-E-01 CLINIC CAMBRIDGESHIRE ALMOND ROAD

ST NEOTS Edge of Town No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 6 5 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 06/03/03 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 CW-05-E-01 CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC CORNWALL FALMOUTH ROAD

T R U R O Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 7 5 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 10/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 DC-05-E-01 MEDICAL CENTRE DORSET SALISBURY ROAD

SHAFTESBURY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 1 7 9 0 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 02/09/03 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 DS-05-E-01 CHILDREN'S CLINIC DERBYSHIRE HIGH STREET CLAY CROSS NEAR CHESTERFIELD Town Centre No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 1 1 7 5 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 23/06/06 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 LN-05-E-01 CLINIC LINCOLNSHIRE AVENUE ROAD

GRANTHAM Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 4 0 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 10/11/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 LN-05-E-02 CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC LINCOLNSHIRE NORTH PARADE

GRANTHAM Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 1 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 10/06/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 TW-05-E-01 ALTERNATIVE CLINIC TYNE & WEAR HAWKEY'S LANE C H R I T O N NORTH SHIELDS Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 1 5 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 09/11/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 8 WO-05-E-01 CLINIC WORCESTERSHIRE NEW ROAD

BROMSGROVE Edge of Town Centre No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 26/02/03 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 05 - HEALTH/E - CLINICS VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 08:00-09:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 7 85th Percentile = No. 2

Median Values Arrivals: 1.095 Departures: 0.583 Totals: 1.678

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 CA-05-E-01 CLINIC ST NEOTS CAMBRIDGESHIRE 650 Thu 06/03/03 3.846 4.000 7.846 2 DC-05-E-01 MEDICAL CENTRE SHAFTESBURY DORSET 1790 Tue 02/09/03 2.905 0.894 3.799 3 WO-05-E-01 CLINIC BROMSGROVE WORCESTERSHIRE 500 Wed 26/02/03 1.400 1.000 2.400 4 LN-05-E-01 CLINIC GRANTHAM LINCOLNSHIRE 1400 Wed 10/11/10 1.714 0.214 1.928 5 LN-05-E-02 CHIROPRACTIC C GRANTHAM LINCOLNSHIRE 210 Mon 10/06/13 0.476 0.952 1.428 6 CW-05-E-01 CHIROPRACTIC C TRURO CORNWALL 75 Mon 10/10/11 1.333 0.000 1.333 7 TW-05-E-01 ALTERNATIVE CL NORTH SHIELDS TYNE & WEAR 215 Tue 09/11/10 0.930 0.000 0.930 8 DS-05-E-01 CHILDREN'S CLI NEAR CHESTERFIELD DERBYSHIRE 1175 Fri 23/06/06 0.596 0.000 0.596

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 05 - HEALTH/E - CLINICS VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 17:00-18:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 6 85th Percentile = No. 2

Median Values Arrivals: 0.769 Departures: 2.154 Totals: 2.923

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 LN-05-E-02 CHIROPRACTIC C GRANTHAM LINCOLNSHIRE 210 Mon 10/06/13 2.857 3.810 6.667 2 DC-05-E-01 MEDICAL CENTRE SHAFTESBURY DORSET 1790 Tue 02/09/03 1.844 2.961 4.805 3 WO-05-E-01 CLINIC BROMSGROVE WORCESTERSHIRE 500 Wed 26/02/03 1.200 1.800 3.000 4 CA-05-E-01 CLINIC ST NEOTS CAMBRIDGESHIRE 650 Thu 06/03/03 0.769 2.154 2.923 5 TW-05-E-01 ALTERNATIVE CL NORTH SHIELDS TYNE & WEAR 215 Tue 09/11/10 0.465 1.395 1.860 6 LN-05-E-01 CLINIC GRANTHAM LINCOLNSHIRE 1400 Wed 10/11/10 0.071 0.643 0.714 7 DS-05-E-01 CHILDREN'S CLI NEAR CHESTERFIELD DERBYSHIRE 1175 Fri 23/06/06 0.000 0.170 0.170

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 05 - HEALTH/E - CLINICS VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 07:00-19:00 Under 6 Surveys Included, 15th/85th Percentile Not Highlighted 3 of selected days excluded due to incomplete data for time range

Median Values Arrivals: 23.256 Departures: 23.256 Totals: 46.512

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area GFA Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 CA-05-E-01 CLINIC ST NEOTS CAMBRIDGESHIRE 650 Thu 06/03/03 40.462 39.385 79.847 2 DC-05-E-01 MEDICAL CENTRE SHAFTESBURY DORSET 1790 Tue 02/09/03 34.916 34.693 69.609 3 TW-05-E-01 ALTERNATIVE CL NORTH SHIELDS TYNE & WEAR 215 Tue 09/11/10 23.256 23.256 46.512 4 LN-05-E-01 CLINIC GRANTHAM LINCOLNSHIRE 1400 Wed 10/11/10 8.571 8.286 16.857 5 DS-05-E-01 CHILDREN'S CLI NEAR CHESTERFIELD DERBYSHIRE 1175 Fri 23/06/06 3.319 3.319 6.638

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 05 - HEALTH Category : E - CLINICS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 03 SOUTH WEST DC DORSET 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 1790 to 1790 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 75 to 1790 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/03 to 10/06/13

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Tuesday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 1 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: No Sub Category 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: D 1 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Filtering Stage 3 selection (Cont.):

Population within 1 mile: 5,001 to 10,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 5,001 to 25,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 1.1 to 1.5 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 DC-05-E-01 MEDICAL CENTRE DORSET SALISBURY ROAD

SHAFTESBURY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 1 7 9 0 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 02/09/03 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection CA-05-E-01 - CW-05-E-01 - DS-05-E-01 - LN-05-E-01 - LN-05-E-02 - TW-05-E-01 - WO-05-E-01 - TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 05 - HEALTH/E - CLINICS VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 1790 0.391 1 1790 0.223 1 1790 0.614 08:00 - 09:00 1 1790 2.905 1 1790 0.894 1 1790 3.799 09:00 - 10:00 1 1790 6.089 1 1790 4.022 1 1790 10.111 10:00 - 11:00 1 1790 4.860 1 1790 4.972 1 1790 9.832 11:00 - 12:00 1 1790 3.911 1 1790 4.637 1 1790 8.548 12:00 - 13:00 1 1790 2.514 1 1790 3.575 1 1790 6.089 13:00 - 14:00 1 1790 2.346 1 1790 2.235 1 1790 4.581 14:00 - 15:00 1 1790 3.073 1 1790 3.128 1 1790 6.201 15:00 - 16:00 1 1790 2.123 1 1790 2.793 1 1790 4.916 16:00 - 17:00 1 1790 3.408 1 1790 3.073 1 1790 6.481 17:00 - 18:00 1 1790 1.844 1 1790 2.961 1 1790 4.805 18:00 - 19:00 1 1790 1.453 1 1790 2.179 1 1790 3.632 19:00 - 20:00 1 1790 0.112 1 1790 0.279 1 1790 0.391 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3 5.029 3 4.971 7 0.000

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 1790 - 1790 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/03 - 10/06/13 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 7

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 05/11/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 05 - HEALTH/E - CLINICS OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.056 1 1790 0.056 08:00 - 09:00 1 1790 0.056 1 1790 0.056 1 1790 0.112 09:00 - 10:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 1 1790 0.112 1 1790 0.056 1 1790 0.168 19:00 - 20:00 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 1 1790 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.168 0.168 0.336

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 1790 - 1790 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/03 - 10/06/13 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 7

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST EX ESSEX 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA SF SUFFOLK 2 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS LN LINCOLNSHIRE 2 days NT NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 1 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS SH SHROPSHIRE 1 days WO WORCESTERSHIRE 2 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 08 NORTH WEST CH CHESHIRE 2 days 09 NORTH TV TEES VALLEY 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Number of dwellings Actual Range: 101 to 237 (units: ) Range Selected by User: 100 to 300 (units: )

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 22/09/12

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 2 days Tuesday 4 days Wednesday 1 days Thursday 4 days Friday 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 13 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 6 Edge of Town 7

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Residential Zone 8 Out of Town 1 No Sub Category 4 TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: C 3 13 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 1 mile: 1,001 to 5,000 1 days 5,001 to 10,000 2 days 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 15,001 to 20,000 6 days 20,001 to 25,000 2 days 25,001 to 50,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 5,001 to 25,000 1 days 50,001 to 75,000 1 days 75,001 to 100,000 4 days 100,001 to 125,000 4 days 125,001 to 250,000 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 5 days 1.1 to 1.5 8 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 13 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 CH-03-A-02 HOUSES/FLATS CHESHIRE SYDNEY ROAD

CREWE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 7 4 Survey date: TUESDAY 14/10/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 CH-03-A-06 SEMI-DET./BUNGALOWS CHESHIRE CREWE ROAD

CREWE Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Number of dwellings: 1 2 9 Survey date: TUESDAY 14/10/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 EX-03-A-01 SEMI-DET. ESSEX MILTON ROAD CORRINGHAM STANFORD-LE-HOPE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 2 3 7 Survey date: TUESDAY 13/05/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 LN-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLNSHIRE BRANT ROAD BRACEBRIDGE LINCOLN Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 5 0 Survey date: TUESDAY 15/05/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 LN-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLNSHIRE HYKEHAM ROAD

LINCOLN Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 8 6 Survey date: MONDAY 14/05/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 NT-03-A-03 SEMI DETACHED NOTTINGHAMSHIRE B6018 SUTTON ROAD

KIRKBY-IN-ASHFIELD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 6 6 Survey date: WEDNESDAY 28/06/06 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 NY-03-A-06 BUNGALOWS & SEMI DET. NORTH YORKSHIRE HORSEFAIR

BOROUGHBRIDGE Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 1 5 Survey date: FRIDAY 14/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

8 SF-03-A-02 SEMI DET./TERRACED SUFFOLK STOKE PARK DRIVE MAIDENHALL IPSWICH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 2 3 0 Survey date: THURSDAY 24/05/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 9 SF-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES SUFFOLK BARTON HILL FORNHAM ST MARTIN BURY ST EDMUNDS Edge of Town Out of Town Total Number of dwellings: 1 0 1 Survey date: MONDAY 15/05/06 Survey Type: MANUAL 10 SH-03-A-04 TERRACED SHROPSHIRE ST MICHAEL'S STREET

SHREWSBURY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Number of dwellings: 1 0 8 Survey date: THURSDAY 11/06/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 11 TV-03-A-01 HOUSES & FLATS TEES VALLEY POWLETT ROAD

HARTLEPOOL Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Number of dwellings: 2 2 5 Survey date: THURSDAY 14/04/05 Survey Type: MANUAL 12 WO-03-A-03 DETACHED WORCESTERSHIRE BLAKEBROOK BLAKEBROOK KIDDERMINSTER Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 3 8 Survey date: FRIDAY 05/05/06 Survey Type: MANUAL 13 WO-03-A-06 DET./TERRACED WORCESTERSHIRE ST GODWALDS ROAD ASTON FIELDS BROMSGROVE Edge of Town No Sub Category Total Number of dwellings: 2 3 2 Survey date: THURSDAY 30/06/05 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 08:00-09:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 11 85th Percentile = No. 3

Median Values Arrivals: 0.183 Departures: 0.425 Totals: 0.608

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area DWELLS Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 WO-03-A-03 DETACHED KIDDERMINSTER WORCESTERSHIRE 138 Fri 05/05/06 0.203 0.543 0.746 2 SH-03-A-04 TERRACED SHREWSBURY SHROPSHIRE 108 Thu 11/06/09 0.287 0.454 0.741 3 SF-03-A-02 SEMI DET./TERR IPSWICH SUFFOLK 230 Thu 24/05/07 0.243 0.491 0.734 4 EX-03-A-01 SEMI-DET. STANFORD-LE-HOPE ESSEX 237 Tue 13/05/08 0.177 0.523 0.700 5 SF-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES BURY ST EDMUNDS SUFFOLK 101 Mon 15/05/06 0.109 0.554 0.663 6 LN-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 150 Tue 15/05/07 0.187 0.440 0.627 7 LN-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 186 Mon 14/05/07 0.183 0.425 0.608 8 TV-03-A-01 HOUSES & FLATS HARTLEPOOL TEES VALLEY 225 Thu 14/04/05 0.138 0.458 0.596 9 WO-03-A-06 DET./TERRACED BROMSGROVE WORCESTERSHIRE 232 Thu 30/06/05 0.099 0.448 0.547 10 NY-03-A-06 BUNGALOWS & SE BOROUGHBRIDGE NORTH YORKSHIRE 115 Fri 14/10/11 0.096 0.400 0.496 11 CH-03-A-02 HOUSES/FLATS CREWE CHESHIRE 174 Tue 14/10/08 0.103 0.374 0.477 12 NT-03-A-03 SEMI DETACHED KIRKBY-IN-ASHFIELD NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 166 Wed 28/06/06 0.108 0.313 0.421 13 CH-03-A-06 SEMI-DET./BUNG CREWE CHESHIRE 129 Tue 14/10/08 0.163 0.240 0.403

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 17:00-18:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 11 85th Percentile = No. 3

Median Values Arrivals: 0.398 Departures: 0.307 Totals: 0.705

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area DWELLS Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 WO-03-A-03 DETACHED KIDDERMINSTER WORCESTERSHIRE 138 Fri 05/05/06 0.558 0.319 0.877 2 LN-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 186 Mon 14/05/07 0.495 0.355 0.850 3 SH-03-A-04 TERRACED SHREWSBURY SHROPSHIRE 108 Thu 11/06/09 0.463 0.296 0.759 4 SF-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES BURY ST EDMUNDS SUFFOLK 101 Mon 15/05/06 0.525 0.228 0.753 5 SF-03-A-02 SEMI DET./TERR IPSWICH SUFFOLK 230 Thu 24/05/07 0.478 0.248 0.726 6 EX-03-A-01 SEMI-DET. STANFORD-LE-HOPE ESSEX 237 Tue 13/05/08 0.439 0.274 0.713 7 NT-03-A-03 SEMI DETACHED KIRKBY-IN-ASHFIELD NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 166 Wed 28/06/06 0.398 0.307 0.705 8 LN-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 150 Tue 15/05/07 0.413 0.213 0.626 9 TV-03-A-01 HOUSES & FLATS HARTLEPOOL TEES VALLEY 225 Thu 14/04/05 0.409 0.209 0.618 10 WO-03-A-06 DET./TERRACED BROMSGROVE WORCESTERSHIRE 232 Thu 30/06/05 0.414 0.185 0.599 11 CH-03-A-02 HOUSES/FLATS CREWE CHESHIRE 174 Tue 14/10/08 0.322 0.236 0.558 12 NY-03-A-06 BUNGALOWS & SE BOROUGHBRIDGE NORTH YORKSHIRE 115 Fri 14/10/11 0.296 0.174 0.470 13 CH-03-A-06 SEMI-DET./BUNG CREWE CHESHIRE 129 Tue 14/10/08 0.132 0.140 0.272

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 5 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

RANK ORDER for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 07:00-19:00 WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 15th Percentile = No. 11 85th Percentile = No. 3

Median Values Arrivals: 2.647 Departures: 2.733 Totals: 5.380

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel Rank Site-Ref Description Town/City Area DWELLS Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 1 WO-03-A-03 DETACHED KIDDERMINSTER WORCESTERSHIRE 138 Fri 05/05/06 3.507 3.572 7.079 2 SF-03-A-02 SEMI DET./TERR IPSWICH SUFFOLK 230 Thu 24/05/07 3.257 3.239 6.496 3 LN-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 186 Mon 14/05/07 2.957 2.968 5.925 4 EX-03-A-01 SEMI-DET. STANFORD-LE-HOPE ESSEX 237 Tue 13/05/08 2.975 2.932 5.907 5 SF-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES BURY ST EDMUNDS SUFFOLK 101 Mon 15/05/06 2.950 2.950 5.900 6 NT-03-A-03 SEMI DETACHED KIRKBY-IN-ASHFIELD NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 166 Wed 28/06/06 2.608 2.928 5.536 7 LN-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 150 Tue 15/05/07 2.647 2.733 5.380 8 TV-03-A-01 HOUSES & FLATS HARTLEPOOL TEES VALLEY 225 Thu 14/04/05 2.591 2.653 5.244 9 SH-03-A-04 TERRACED SHREWSBURY SHROPSHIRE 108 Thu 11/06/09 2.352 2.574 4.926 10 NY-03-A-06 BUNGALOWS & SE BOROUGHBRIDGE NORTH YORKSHIRE 115 Fri 14/10/11 2.313 2.339 4.652 11 WO-03-A-06 DET./TERRACED BROMSGROVE WORCESTERSHIRE 232 Thu 30/06/05 2.220 2.418 4.638 12 CH-03-A-02 HOUSES/FLATS CREWE CHESHIRE 174 Tue 14/10/08 2.218 2.345 4.563 13 CH-03-A-06 SEMI-DET./BUNG CREWE CHESHIRE 129 Tue 14/10/08 1.992 2.023 4.015

This section displays actual (not average) trip rates for each of the survey days in the selected set, and ranks them in order of relative trip rate intensity, for a given time period (or peak period irrespective of time) selected by the user. The count type and direction are both displayed just above the table, along with the rows within the table representing the 85th and 15th percentile trip rate figures (highlighted in bold within the table itself).

The table itself displays details of each individual survey, alongside arrivals, departures and totals trip rates, sorted by whichever of the three directional options has been chosen by the user. As with the preceeding trip rate calculation results table, the trip rates shown are per the calculation factor (e.g. per 100m2 GFA, per employee, per hectare, etc). Note that if the peak period option has been selected (as opposed to a specific chosen time period), the peak period for each individual survey day in the table is also displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 1 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 06 WEST MIDLANDS SH SHROPSHIRE 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Number of dwellings Actual Range: 108 to 108 (units: ) Range Selected by User: 100 to 300 (units: )

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/05 to 22/09/12

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Thursday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 1 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: No Sub Category 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: C 3 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 2 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

Filtering Stage 3 selection (Cont.):

Population within 1 mile: 20,001 to 25,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 75,001 to 100,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 1.1 to 1.5 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 1 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 3 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 SH-03-A-04 TERRACED SHROPSHIRE ST MICHAEL'S STREET

SHREWSBURY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Number of dwellings: 1 0 8 Survey date: THURSDAY 11/06/09 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection CH-03-A-02 - CH-03-A-06 - EX-03-A-01 - LN-03-A-01 - LN-03-A-02 - NT-03-A-03 - NY-03-A-06 - SF-03-A-02 - SF-03-A-03 - TV-03-A-01 - WO-03-A-03 - WO-03-A-06 - TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 4 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 108 0.056 1 108 0.380 1 108 0.436 08:00 - 09:00 1 108 0.287 1 108 0.454 1 108 0.741 09:00 - 10:00 1 108 0.167 1 108 0.176 1 108 0.343 10:00 - 11:00 1 108 0.130 1 108 0.139 1 108 0.269 11:00 - 12:00 1 108 0.139 1 108 0.231 1 108 0.370 12:00 - 13:00 1 108 0.148 1 108 0.148 1 108 0.296 13:00 - 14:00 1 108 0.167 1 108 0.102 1 108 0.269 14:00 - 15:00 1 108 0.120 1 108 0.130 1 108 0.250 15:00 - 16:00 1 108 0.222 1 108 0.222 1 108 0.444 16:00 - 17:00 1 108 0.259 1 108 0.130 1 108 0.389 17:00 - 18:00 1 108 0.463 1 108 0.296 1 108 0.759 18:00 - 19:00 1 108 0.194 1 108 0.167 1 108 0.361 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 2.352 2.575 4.927

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 108 - 108 (units: ) Survey date date range: 01/01/05 - 22/09/12 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 12

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 2013(b)v6.12.2 240913 B16.06 (C) 2013 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Tuesday 15/10/13 Page 6 BWB CONSULTING KAYES WALK NOTTINGHAM Licence No: 714101

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED OGVS Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 1 108 0.028 1 108 0.009 1 108 0.037 13:00 - 14:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.019 1 108 0.019 14:00 - 15:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 1 108 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.028 0.028 0.056

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 108 - 108 (units: ) Survey date date range: 01/01/05 - 22/09/12 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 1 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 12

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. APPENDIX H – JOURNEY TO WORK DATA

Work LA destination Total ome workeway Worke Metro Train Bus Taxi Car driversar driver Triar passangeMotorcycle Bicycle Pedestrians Other Amber Valley 21 0 21 0060151.2% 00000 Ashfield 20 0 20 0000171.3% 03000 Birmingham 303000030.2% 00000 Blaby 909033030.2% 00000 Bristol, City of 303000030.2% 00000 Caradon 303000000.0% 00030 Carmarthenshire 303000030.2% 00000 Charnwood 16 0 16 0000161.3% 00000 Derby 63 0 63 0900514.0% 30000 Derbyshire Dales 303000000.0% 03000 Doncaster 606000060.5% 00000 East Lindsey 303000000.0% 00030 East Staffordshire 303000030.2% 00000 Erewash 109 0 109 0 0 12 0 71 5.6% 17 0900 Gedling 50 0 50 0030352.7% 00930 Glasgow City 303000030.2% 00000 Greenwich 303000000.0% 30000 Harborough 303000030.2% 00000 Hart 303000000.0% 00300 Leicester 14 0 14 080030.2% 30000 Mansfield 15 0 15 0000151.2% 00000 Melton 606000060.5% 00000 Newark and Sherwood 18 0 18 0300120.9% 00300 North East Derbyshire 303000030.2% 00000 North West Leicestershire 42 0 42 0030362.8% 03000 Nottingham 1162 0 1162 0 72 209 3 557 43.7% 65 10 148 98 0 Rugby 303000030.2% 00000 Rushcliffe 100 0 100 0 3 10 3 66 5.2% 60930 South Derbyshire 10 0 10 000070.5% 03000 South Kesteven 606003030.2% 00000 St Albans 303000030.2% 00000 Surrey Heath 303000030.2% 00000 Worcester 303000030.2% 00000 #N/A 606000000.0% 30300 Broxtowe 1007 157 850 0 5 48 3 324 25.4% 51 8 98 310 3

Home workers Metro Train Bus Taxi Car driversar driver Triar passangeMotorcycle Bicycle Pedestrians Other 2728 157 2571 0 103 297 9 1276 1 151 30 282 420 3 5.8% 0.0% 3.8% 10.9% 0.3% 46.8% 0.0% 5.5% 1.1% 10.3% 15.4% 0.1% 0.0% 4.0% 11.6% 0.4% 49.6% 0.0% 5.9% 1.2% 11.0% 16.3% 0.1%

Broxtowe Nuthall East and Strelley 303000030.2% 00000 Chilwell East 27 0 27 0000110.9% 30670 Chilwell West 13 0 13 000090.7% 00400 Cossall and Kimberley 12 0 12 0000120.9% 00000 Eastwood South 303000030.2% 00000 Bramcote 13 0 13 006070.5% 00000 Stapleford South East 606003030.2% 00000 Stapleford South West 19 0 19 0000100.8% 00630 Toton and Chilwell Meadows 28 0 28 0030100.8% 90330 Trowell 303000030.2% 00000 Beeston West 190 0 190 0 0 24 0 55 4.3% 13 5 16 77 0 Attenborough 29 0 29 0030110.9% 60900 Beeston Central 139 0 139 0033413.2% 3 0 30 59 0 Beeston North 15 0 15 000090.7% 00060 Beeston Rylands 507 157 350 056013710.7% 17 3 24 155 3

Nottingham Arboretum 44 0 44 0 4 17 3 14 1.10% 30030 Aspley 303000030.24% 00000 Basford 404000040.31% 00000 Berridge 19 0 19 0030131.02% 00300 Bestwood 303000030.24% 00000 Bilborough 47 0 47 0030382.98% 00600 Bridge 266 0 266 0 52 66 0 110 8.62% 13 0 21 4 0 Bulwell 16 0 16 005080.63% 30000 Bulwell Forest 303000030.24% 00000 Clifton North 15 0 15 003080.63% 00400 Clifton South 808000080.63% 00000 Dales 36 0 36 0080191.49% 30600 Dunkirk and Lenton 357 0 357 0 3 43 0 146 11.44% 22 7 72 64 0 Leen Valley 23 0 23 0000201.57% 30000 Mapperley 10 0 10 003070.55% 00000 Radford and Park 83 0 83 0 10 21 0 47 3.68% 50000 Sherwood 23 0 23 0030201.57% 00000 St Ann's 51 0 51 0 3 19 0 22 1.72% 40300 Wollaton East and Lenton Ab 137 0 137 0 0 12 0 57 4.47% 9 3 33 23 0 Wollaton West 14 0 14 003070.55% 00040 Residential LA Origin Total ome workeway Worke Metro Train Bus Taxi Car driversar driver Triar passangeMotorcycle Bicycle Pedestrians Other Amber Valley 610610060552.5%00000 Ashfield 670670000612.8%60000 Barnsley 12012000090.4%30000 Bassetlaw 606000030.1%00300 Bedford 303000030.1%00000 Birmingham 303000030.1%00000 Blaby 12012000090.4%30000 Bolsover 606000060.3%00000 Breckland 303000030.1%00000 Cannock Chase 303000030.1%00000 Castle Morpeth 303000030.1%00000 Charnwood 420420900301.4%30000 Chesterfield 606000060.3%00000 Coventry 303000030.1%00000 Daventry 606000060.3%00000 Derby 940940330733.4%150000 Derbyshire Dales 303000030.1%00000 Doncaster 606000060.3%00000 East Northamptonshire303000000.0%30000 East Riding of Yorkshire606000060.3%00000 East Staffordshire 606030030.1%00000 Forest Heath 303000030.1%00000 Gedling 2290229032101627.5%283930 Gravesham 303000030.1%00000 Great Yarmouth 303000030.1%00000 Harborough 303000030.1%00000 Hartlepool 303000030.1%00000 Hinckley and Bosworth303000030.1%00000 Kettering 303000030.1%00000 Leeds 303000030.1%00000 Leicester 240240900150.7%00000 Lincoln 303000000.0%30000 Maidstone 303000030.1%00000 Mansfield 12012003060.3%30000 Medway 303000030.1%00000 Melton 130130000130.6%00000 New Forest 303000030.1%00000 Newark and Sherwood560560630321.5%93300 Newcastle upon Tyne 303000030.1%00000 North East Derbyshire12012030090.4%00000 North Kesteven 150150000150.7%00000 North Tyneside 303000030.1%00000 North Warwickshire 303000030.1%00000 North West Leicestershire280280000281.3%00000 Nuneaton and Bedworth303000030.1%00000 Rugby 303000030.1%00000 Rushcliffe 283 0 283 0 6 17 0 226 10.4% 18 3 10 3 0 Rutland 303000030.1%00000 Sheffield 180180000180.8%00000 Solihull 303000030.1%00000 South Derbyshire 210210000211.0%00000 South Kesteven 12012030090.4%00000 South Tyneside 303000030.1%00000 Sunderland 303000030.1%00000 Tamworth 303000030.1%00000 Wakefield 606000060.3%00000 Walsall 303000030.1%00000 Broxtowe 1306 157 1149 0 11 72 0 580 26.7% 65 3 136 279 3 Nottingham 541 0 541 0 15 58 6 342 15.7% 52 3 53 9 3 Erewash 427 0 427 0 10 33 0 330 15.2% 28 3 20 0 3

Total Home workers Metro Train Bus Taxi Car drivers Car driver TCar passangMotorcycleBicycle PedestriansOther 3426 157 3269 0 81 216 6 2172 1 239 18 234 294 9 4.6% 0.0% 2.4% 6.3% 0.2% 63.4% 0.0% 7.0% 0.5% 6.8% 8.6% 0.3% 0.0% 2.5% 6.6% 0.2% 66.4% 0.0% 7.3% 0.6% 7.2% 9.0% 0.3%

Broxtowe Attenborough 320320000190.00874800850 Awsworth 10010000040.00184200330 Beeston Central 790790330210.009669405430 Beeston North 680680060320.014733007230 Beeston Rylands 50715735005601370.063076 17 3 24 155 3 Beeston West 880880030360.016575 5 0 22 22 0 Bramcote 730730060400.018416 9 0 13 5 0 Chilwell East 720720060370.017035 4 0 18 7 0 Chilwell West 105 0 105 0 0 15 0 54 0.024862 11 0 15 10 0 Cossall and Kimberley200200000170.00782700030 Eastwood North and Greasley (Be606000060.00276200000 Eastwood South 12012003090.00414400000 Greasley (Giltbrook and Newthorp 130130000130.00598500000 Nuthall East and Strelley150150000150.00690600000 Nuthall West and Greasley (Watna 909003060.00276200000 Stapleford North 25 0 25 0 0 11 0 14 0.00644600000 Stapleford South East 350350030220.01012940330 Stapleford South West290290000220.01012940300 Toton and Chilwell Meadows960960370670.030847 7 0 12 0 0 Trowell 12012000090.00414400300

Nottingham Arboretum 15015030060.28%30300 Aspley 350350040210.97%70300 Basford 160160000160.74%00000 Berridge 240240080130.60%30000 Bestwood 10010003070.32%00000 Bilborough 220220000160.74%30300 Bridge 270270340110.51%60300 Bulwell 270270000241.10%30000 Bulwell Forest 250250030190.87%00300 Clifton North 280280003221.01%30000 Clifton South 350350030241.10%30500 Dales 320320370190.87%00300 Dunkirk and Lenton 230230000110.51%30333 Leen Valley 160160000100.46%03300 Mapperley 370370060221.01%30330 Radford and Park 350350360261.20%00000 St Ann's 24024033060.28%60600 Sherwood 230230050150.69%30000 Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey 23023006050.23%30630 Wollaton West 640640003492.26%30900

Erewash Abbotsford 270270000240.0110500300 Breaston 190190000130.00598503300 Cotmanhay 16016003090.00414440000 Derby Road East 160160030130.00598500000 Derby Road West 350350030290.01335230000 Draycott 808000050.00230200300 Hallam Fields 11011003080.00368300000 Ilkeston Central 11011003050.00230230000 Ilkeston North 404000040.00184200000 Kirk Hallam 606000060.00276200000 Little Hallam 15015003090.00414430000 Long Eaton Central 430430030340.01565430300 Nottingham Road 500500090330.01519330500 Ockbrook And Borrowash10010003070.00322300000 Old Park 15015030060.00276230300 Sandiacre North 220220000190.00874830000 Sandiacre South 300300000300.01381200000 Sawley 220220300190.00874800000 Stanley 707000040.00184200003 West Hallam and Dale Abbey160160000160.00736600000 Wilsthorpe 440440400370.01703530000 APPENDIX I – PICADY OUTPUT

TRL LIMITED

(C) COPYRIGHT 2001

CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS

PICADY 4.1 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (MAY 2001)

ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO

------FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT: TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864 EMAIL: [email protected] ------

THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION

Run with file:- "x:\BMT\BMT2091_Beeston Business Park\Design and Calculations\BWB T&T\Junction Assessments\Picady\ Meadow Road - Technology Drive\Meadow Road - Technology Drive - Laburnum Grove 2028 with Dev AM.vpi" (drive-on-the-left ) at 13:48:38 on Thursday, 13 March 2014

RUN TITLE ********* Meadow Road - Technology Drive - Laburnum Grove 2028 with Dev AM

.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY ***************************************

INPUT DATA ------

MINOR ROAD (ARM D) I I I I I I MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) ------MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I I I I I I MINOR ROAD (ARM B)

ARM A IS Meadow Road ARM B IS Technology Drive ARM C IS Station Road ARM D IS Laburnum Grove

STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION ------

STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B

STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C

ETC.

.GEOMETRIC DATA ------

------I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I MINOR ROAD D I ------I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 7.60 M. I ( W ) 7.60 M. I I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I I I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.40 M. I (WA-D) 2.20 M. I I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 160.0 M. I (VA-D) 100.0 M. I I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I YES I I I I I I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 52.0 M. I (VD-A) 36.0 M. I I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 39.0 M. I (VD-C) 27.0 M. I I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.80 M. I (WD-A) - I I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 3.00 M. I (WD-C) - I I - WIDTH AT 0 M FROM JUNC. I - I 7.90 M. I I - WIDTH AT 5 M FROM JUNC. I - I 3.60 M. I I - WIDTH AT 10 M FROM JUNC. I - I 2.60 M. I I - WIDTH AT 15 M FROM JUNC. I - I 2.60 M. I I - WIDTH AT 20 M FROM JUNC. I - I 2.60 M. I I - LENGTH OF FLARED SECTION I - I DERIVED: 0 PCU I ------

.

.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA ------

TIME PERIOD BEGINS 07.45 AND ENDS 09.15

LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES. LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.

DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA

------I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I ------I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 4.30 I 6.45 I 4.30 I I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 3.85 I 5.77 I 3.85 I I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 10.45 I 15.67 I 10.45 I I ARM D I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 0.16 I 0.24 I 0.16 I ------

. ------I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I I ------I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I ARM D I ------I 07.45 - 09.15 I I I I I I I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.174 I 0.826 I 0.000 I I I I 0.0 I 60.0 I 284.0 I 0.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I I I ARM B I 0.101 I 0.000 I 0.899 I 0.000 I I I I 31.0 I 0.0 I 277.0 I 0.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 1.4)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I I I ARM C I 0.205 I 0.793 I 0.000 I 0.002 I I I I 171.0 I 663.0 I 0.0 I 2.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.8)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I I I ARM D I 0.154 I 0.000 I 0.846 I 0.000 I I I I 2.0 I 0.0 I 11.0 I 0.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I ------

TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA

THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 07.45-08.00 I I B-CD 3.46 10.34 0.335 0.0 0.5 7.1 I I B-AD 0.39 4.77 0.081 0.0 0.1 1.2 I I A-BCD 0.00 6.65 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 0.75 I I A-C 3.55 I I D-AB 0.03 10.01 0.002 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.14 4.97 0.028 0.0 0.0 0.4 I I C-D 0.03 I I C-A 2.14 I I C-B 8.29 10.21 0.811 0.0 3.7 45.9 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 08.00-08.15 I I B-CD 4.13 10.06 0.411 0.5 0.7 9.9 I I B-AD 0.46 3.96 0.117 0.1 0.1 1.9 I I A-BCD 0.00 6.01 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 0.90 I I A-C 4.24 I I D-AB 0.03 9.89 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.16 4.20 0.039 0.0 0.0 0.6 I I C-D 0.03 I I C-A 2.55 I I C-B 9.90 10.01 0.988 3.7 11.5 125.0 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 08.15-08.30 I I B-CD 5.06 9.59 0.528 0.7 1.1 15.4 I I B-AD 0.57 2.78 0.204 0.1 0.2 3.5 I I A-BCD 0.00 5.08 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 1.10 I I A-C 5.19 I I D-AB 0.04 9.70 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I D-BC 0.20 3.11 0.065 0.0 0.1 1.0 I I C-D 0.04 I I C-A 3.13 I I C-B 12.12 9.73 1.246 11.5 48.2 450.6 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 08.30-08.45 I I B-CD 5.06 9.38 0.540 1.1 1.1 16.9 I I B-AD 0.57 2.00 0.283 0.2 0.4 5.2 I I A-BCD 0.00 4.35 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 1.10 I I A-C 5.19 I I D-AB 0.04 9.66 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I D-BC 0.20 2.56 0.079 0.1 0.1 1.2 I I C-D 0.04 I I C-A 3.13 I I C-B 12.12 9.73 1.246 48.2 84.2 993.6 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 08.45-09.00 I I B-CD 4.13 9.81 0.422 1.1 0.7 11.7 I I B-AD 0.46 2.26 0.205 0.4 0.3 4.3 I I A-BCD 0.00 4.41 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 0.90 I I A-C 4.24 I I D-AB 0.03 9.85 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.16 2.99 0.055 0.1 0.1 0.9 I I C-D 0.03 I I C-A 2.55 I I C-B 9.90 10.01 0.988 84.2 84.2 1263.5 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 09.00-09.15 I I B-CD 3.46 10.20 0.340 0.7 0.5 8.1 I I B-AD 0.39 2.99 0.129 0.3 0.2 2.4 I I A-BCD 0.00 4.98 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 0.75 I I A-C 3.55 I I D-AB 0.03 9.99 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.14 3.71 0.037 0.1 0.0 0.6 I I C-D 0.03 I I C-A 2.14 I I C-B 8.29 10.21 0.811 84.2 57.1 1060.2 I I I ------

*WARNING* NO MARGINAL ANALYSIS OF CAPACITIES AS MAJOR ROAD BLOCKING MAY OCCUR . QUEUE FOR STREAM B-CD ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 08.00 0.5 08.15 0.7 * 08.30 1.1 * 08.45 1.1 * 09.00 0.7 * 09.15 0.5 * . QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AD ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 08.00 0.1 08.15 0.1 08.30 0.2 08.45 0.4 09.00 0.3 09.15 0.2 . QUEUE FOR STREAM A-BCD ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 08.00 0.0 08.15 0.0 08.30 0.0 08.45 0.0 09.00 0.0 09.15 0.0 . QUEUE FOR STREAM D-AB ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 08.00 0.0 08.15 0.0 08.30 0.0 08.45 0.0 09.00 0.0 09.15 0.0 . QUEUE FOR STREAM D-BC ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 08.00 0.0 08.15 0.0 08.30 0.1 08.45 0.1 09.00 0.1 09.15 0.0 . QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 08.00 3.7 **** 08.15 11.5 ************ 08.30 48.2 ************************************************ 08.45 84.2 ************************************************************************************ 09.00 84.2 ************************************************************************************ 09.15 57.1 ********************************************************* . QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD ------

------I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I I I------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I ------I B-CD I 379.8 I 253.2 I 69.2 I 0.18 I 69.2 I 0.18 I I B-AD I 42.5 I 28.3 I 18.5 I 0.44 I 18.5 I 0.44 I I A-BCD I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.00 I 0.0 I 0.00 I I A-B I 82.3 I 54.8 I I I I I I A-C I 389.4 I 259.6 I I I I I I D-AB I 2.7 I 1.8 I 0.3 I 0.10 I 0.3 I 0.10 I I D-BC I 15.1 I 10.1 I 4.7 I 0.31 I 4.7 I 0.31 I I C-D I 2.7 I 1.8 I I I I I I C-A I 234.5 I 156.3 I I I I I I C-B I 909.1 I 606.1 I 3938.7 I 4.33 I 4098.4 I 4.51 I ------I ALL I 2058.2 I 1372.1 I 4031.3 I 1.96 I 4191.1 I 2.04 I ------

* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD . * INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD. * THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.

END OF JOB

****** PICADY 4 run completed. ======end of file ======

TRL LIMITED

(C) COPYRIGHT 2001

CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS

PICADY 4.1 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (MAY 2001)

ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO

------FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT: TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864 EMAIL: [email protected] ------

THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION

Run with file:- "x:\BMT\BMT2091_Beeston Business Park\Design and Calculations\BWB T&T\Junction Assessments\Picady\ Meadow Road - Technology Drive\Meadow Road - Technology Drive - Laburnum Grove 2028 with Dev PM.vpi" (drive-on-the-left ) at 13:53:50 on Thursday, 13 March 2014

RUN TITLE ********* Meadow Road - Technology Drive - Laburnum Grove 2028 with Dev PM

.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY ***************************************

INPUT DATA ------

MINOR ROAD (ARM D) I I I I I I MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) ------MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I I I I I I MINOR ROAD (ARM B)

ARM A IS Meadow Road ARM B IS Technology Drive ARM C IS Station Road ARM D IS Laburnum Grove

STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION ------

STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B

STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C

ETC.

.GEOMETRIC DATA ------

------I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I MINOR ROAD D I ------I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 7.60 M. I ( W ) 7.60 M. I I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I I I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.40 M. I (WA-D) 2.20 M. I I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 160.0 M. I (VA-D) 100.0 M. I I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I YES I I I I I I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 52.0 M. I (VD-A) 36.0 M. I I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 39.0 M. I (VD-C) 27.0 M. I I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.80 M. I (WD-A) - I I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 3.00 M. I (WD-C) - I I - WIDTH AT 0 M FROM JUNC. I - I 7.90 M. I I - WIDTH AT 5 M FROM JUNC. I - I 3.60 M. I I - WIDTH AT 10 M FROM JUNC. I - I 2.60 M. I I - WIDTH AT 15 M FROM JUNC. I - I 2.60 M. I I - WIDTH AT 20 M FROM JUNC. I - I 2.60 M. I I - LENGTH OF FLARED SECTION I - I DERIVED: 0 PCU I ------

.

.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA ------

TIME PERIOD BEGINS 16.45 AND ENDS 18.15

LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES. LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.

DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA

------I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I ------I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 2.72 I 4.09 I 2.72 I I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 7.24 I 10.86 I 7.24 I I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 6.49 I 9.73 I 6.49 I I ARM D I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 0.06 I 0.09 I 0.06 I ------

. ------I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I I ------I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I ARM D I ------I 16.45 - 18.15 I I I I I I I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.138 I 0.853 I 0.009 I I I I 0.0 I 30.0 I 186.0 I 2.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I I I ARM B I 0.081 I 0.000 I 0.919 I 0.000 I I I I 47.0 I 0.0 I 532.0 I 0.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.4)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I I I ARM C I 0.536 I 0.447 I 0.000 I 0.017 I I I I 278.0 I 232.0 I 0.0 I 9.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.9)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I I I ARM D I 0.400 I 0.000 I 0.600 I 0.000 I I I I 2.0 I 0.0 I 3.0 I 0.0 I I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I I ------

TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA

THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 16.45-17.00 I I B-CD 6.65 10.76 0.618 0.0 1.6 21.3 I I B-AD 0.59 6.60 0.089 0.0 0.1 1.4 I I A-BCD 0.03 10.66 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 0.37 I I A-C 2.32 I I D-AB 0.03 10.01 0.002 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.04 5.28 0.007 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I C-D 0.11 I I C-A 3.47 I I C-B 2.90 10.59 0.274 0.0 0.4 5.4 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 17.00-17.15 I I B-CD 7.94 10.57 0.751 1.6 2.8 37.4 I I B-AD 0.70 6.21 0.113 0.1 0.1 1.8 I I A-BCD 0.04 10.71 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I A-B 0.45 I I A-C 2.77 I I D-AB 0.03 9.84 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.04 4.62 0.010 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I C-D 0.13 I I C-A 4.15 I I C-B 3.46 10.46 0.331 0.4 0.5 7.1 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 17.15-17.30 I I B-CD 9.73 10.31 0.943 2.8 8.4 95.5 I I B-AD 0.86 5.68 0.151 0.1 0.2 2.5 I I A-BCD 0.06 10.79 0.005 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I A-B 0.55 I I A-C 3.38 I I D-AB 0.04 9.61 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I D-BC 0.05 3.72 0.015 0.0 0.0 0.2 I I C-D 0.16 I I C-A 5.08 I I C-B 4.24 10.28 0.413 0.5 0.7 10.0 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 17.30-17.45 I I B-CD 9.73 10.31 0.944 8.4 10.3 141.7 I I B-AD 0.86 5.68 0.151 0.2 0.2 2.6 I I A-BCD 0.06 10.79 0.005 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I A-B 0.55 I I A-C 3.38 I I D-AB 0.04 9.61 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I D-BC 0.05 3.63 0.015 0.0 0.0 0.2 I I C-D 0.16 I I C-A 5.08 I I C-B 4.24 10.28 0.413 0.7 0.7 10.4 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 17.45-18.00 I I B-CD 7.94 10.57 0.751 10.3 3.3 67.1 I I B-AD 0.70 6.21 0.113 0.2 0.1 2.0 I I A-BCD 0.04 10.70 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I A-B 0.45 I I A-C 2.77 I I D-AB 0.03 9.84 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.04 4.48 0.010 0.0 0.0 0.2 I I C-D 0.13 I I C-A 4.15 I I C-B 3.46 10.46 0.331 0.7 0.5 7.8 I I I ------

.------I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAYI I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) I I 18.00-18.15 I I B-CD 6.65 10.76 0.618 3.3 1.7 27.4 I I B-AD 0.59 6.59 0.089 0.1 0.1 1.5 I I A-BCD 0.03 10.65 0.003 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I A-B 0.37 I I A-C 2.32 I I D-AB 0.03 10.01 0.002 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I D-BC 0.04 5.23 0.007 0.0 0.0 0.1 I I C-D 0.11 I I C-A 3.47 I I C-B 2.90 10.59 0.274 0.5 0.4 5.9 I I I ------

*WARNING* NO MARGINAL ANALYSIS OF CAPACITIES AS MAJOR ROAD BLOCKING MAY OCCUR . QUEUE FOR STREAM B-CD ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 17.00 1.6 ** 17.15 2.8 *** 17.30 8.4 ******** 17.45 10.3 ********** 18.00 3.3 *** 18.15 1.7 ** . QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AD ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 17.00 0.1 17.15 0.1 17.30 0.2 17.45 0.2 18.00 0.1 18.15 0.1 . QUEUE FOR STREAM A-BCD ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 17.00 0.0 17.15 0.0 17.30 0.0 17.45 0.0 18.00 0.0 18.15 0.0 . QUEUE FOR STREAM D-AB ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 17.00 0.0 17.15 0.0 17.30 0.0 17.45 0.0 18.00 0.0 18.15 0.0 . QUEUE FOR STREAM D-BC ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 17.00 0.0 17.15 0.0 17.30 0.0 17.45 0.0 18.00 0.0 18.15 0.0 . QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B ------TIME SEGMENT NO. OF ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE 17.00 0.4 17.15 0.5 17.30 0.7 * 17.45 0.7 * 18.00 0.5 * 18.15 0.4 . QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD ------

------I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I I I------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I ------I B-CD I 729.5 I 486.3 I 390.4 I 0.54 I 390.6 I 0.54 I I B-AD I 64.4 I 43.0 I 11.9 I 0.19 I 11.9 I 0.19 I I A-BCD I 4.0 I 2.6 I 0.4 I 0.10 I 0.4 I 0.10 I I A-B I 41.0 I 27.3 I I I I I I A-C I 254.0 I 169.3 I I I I I I D-AB I 2.7 I 1.8 I 0.3 I 0.10 I 0.3 I 0.10 I I D-BC I 4.1 I 2.7 I 1.0 I 0.23 I 1.0 I 0.23 I I C-D I 12.3 I 8.2 I I I I I I C-A I 381.2 I 254.1 I I I I I I C-B I 318.1 I 212.1 I 46.5 I 0.15 I 46.6 I 0.15 I ------I ALL I 1811.4 I 1207.6 I 450.5 I 0.25 I 450.7 I 0.25 I ------

* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD . * INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD. * THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.

END OF JOB

****** PICADY 4 run completed. ======end of file ======

APPENDIX J – LINSIG OUTPUT

Full Input Data And Results

User and Project Details Project:

Title: Location: File name: 140326 Proposed Beeston Signals Layout.lsg3x Author: Company: Address: Notes:

Network Layout Diagram

Phase Diagram

C A

E J D

F I H

G

B

Phase Input Data Phase Name Phase Type Assoc. Phase Street Min Cont Min

A Traffic 7 7

B Traffic 7 7

C Traffic 7 7

D Traffic 7 7

E Filter D 4 0

F Traffic 7 7 G Pedestrian 5 5

H Pedestrian 5 5

I Pedestrian 5 5

J Pedestrian 5 5

Phase Intergreens Matrix Starting Phase

A B C D E F G H I J

A - - - 5 - 6 8 - - -

B - - 5 5 6 6 - 5 6 -

C - 5 - 5 - 5 - - 6 -

D 5 5 5 - - - 8 - - 5 Terminating E ------5 Phase F 5 5 5 - - - 7 - - -

G 5 - - 5 - 5 - - - -

H - 5 ------I - 5 5 ------

J - - - 6 6 - - - - -

Phases in Stage Stage No. Phases in Stage

1 A B J 2 A C E H

3 C E G H

4 D F H I

Stage Diagram 1 Min >= 7 2 Min >= 0 3 Min >= 5 4 Min >= 6 C A C A C A C A

E E E E D J D J D J D J F F F F I I I I H H H H

G G G G

B B B B

Phase Delays Term. Stage Start Stage Phase Type Value Cont value

There are no Phase Delays defined

Prohibited Stage Change To Stage

1 2 3 4

1 6 8 6 From 2 X 8 6 Stage 3 X 5 6

4 5 5 8

Lane Input Data Junction: Unnamed Junction

Def User Physical Lane Turning Lane Start End Sat Flow Saturation Nearside Lane Phases Length Width Gradient Turns Radius Type Disp. Disp. Type Flow Lane (PCU) (m) (m) (PCU/Hr)

Arm 5 Ahead Inf 1/1 U A 2 3 5.0 Geom - 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 6 Left 10.00

1/2 U C 2 3 60.0 Geom - 3.00 0.00 N Arm 8 Right 15.00

Arm 6 Right 15.00 2/1 O B 2 3 60.0 Geom - 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 7 Ahead Inf

Arm 8 Left 10.00

3/1 U D E 2 3 60.0 Geom - 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Left 12.00

Arm 5 Right 15.00 3/2 U D 2 3 5.0 Geom - 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 6 Ahead Inf

Arm 5 Left 10.00

4/1 U F 2 3 60.0 Geom - 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Right 15.00

Arm 8 Ahead Inf

5/1 U 2 3 60.0 Inf ------

6/1 U 2 3 60.0 Inf ------

7/1 U 2 3 60.0 Inf ------

8/1 U 2 3 60.0 Inf ------

Traffic Flow Groups Flow Group Start Time End Time Duration Formula

1: '2028 Total Development AM' 08:00 09:00 01:00

2: '2028 Total Development PM' 17:00 18:00 01:00

Scenario 1: 'Total AM' (FG1: '2028 Total Development AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow : Destination

A B C D Tot.

A 0 2 171 668 841

B 11 0 2 0 13 Origin C 284 0 0 60 344

D 281 0 31 0 312

Tot. 576 2 204 728 1510

Traffic Lane Flows Scenario 1: Lane Total AM

Junction: Unnamed Junction

1/1 173 (short)

1/2 841(In) (with short) 668(Out)

2/1 344

3/1 312(In) (with short) 281(Out)

3/2 31 (short)

4/1 13

5/1 204

6/1 2

7/1 576

8/1 728

Lane Saturation Flows Junction: Unnamed Junction

Lane Turning Nearside Allowed Turning Sat Flow Flared Sat Flow Lane Width Gradient Radius Lane Turns Prop. (PCU/Hr) (PCU/Hr) (m) (m)

Arm 5 Ahead Inf 98.8 % 1/1 3.00 0.00 Y 1912 1912 Arm 6 Left 10.00 1.2 %

1/2 3.00 0.00 N Arm 8 Right 15.00 100.0 % 1868 1868 Arm 6 Right 15.00 0.0 %

2/1 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 7 Ahead Inf 82.6 % 1866 1866

Arm 8 Left 10.00 17.4 %

3/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Left 12.00 100.0 % 1724 1724

Arm 5 Right 15.00 100.0 % 3/2 3.00 0.00 Y 1741 1741 Arm 6 Ahead Inf 0.0 % Arm 5 Left 10.00 15.4 %

4/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Right 15.00 84.6 % 1751 1751

Arm 8 Ahead Inf 0.0 %

5/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

6/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

7/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

8/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

Scenario 2: 'Total PM' (FG2: '2028 Total Development PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow : Destination

A B C D Tot.

A 0 9 278 234 521

B 3 0 2 0 5 Origin C 186 2 0 30 218

D 534 0 47 0 581

Tot. 723 11 327 264 1325

Traffic Lane Flows Scenario 2: Lane Total PM

Junction: Unnamed Junction

1/1 287 (short)

1/2 521(In) (with short) 234(Out)

2/1 218

3/1 581(In) (with short) 534(Out)

3/2 47 (short)

4/1 5

5/1 327

6/1 11

7/1 723

8/1 264

Lane Saturation Flows Junction: Unnamed Junction

Lane Turning Nearside Allowed Turning Sat Flow Flared Sat Flow Lane Width Gradient Radius Lane Turns Prop. (PCU/Hr) (PCU/Hr) (m) (m)

Arm 5 Ahead Inf 96.9 % 1/1 3.00 0.00 Y 1906 1906 Arm 6 Left 10.00 3.1 %

1/2 3.00 0.00 N Arm 8 Right 15.00 100.0 % 1868 1868 Arm 6 Right 15.00 0.9 %

2/1 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 7 Ahead Inf 85.3 % 1875 1875

Arm 8 Left 10.00 13.8 %

3/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Left 12.00 100.0 % 1724 1724

Arm 5 Right 15.00 100.0 % 3/2 3.00 0.00 Y 1741 1741 Arm 6 Ahead Inf 0.0 % Arm 5 Left 10.00 40.0 %

4/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Right 15.00 60.0 % 1732 1732

Arm 8 Ahead Inf 0.0 %

5/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

6/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf 7/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

8/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

Scenario 3: 'Double Cycle Total AM' (FG1: '2028 Total Development AM', Plan 2: 'Network Control Plan 2') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow : Destination

A B C D Tot.

A 0 2 171 668 841

B 11 0 2 0 13 Origin C 284 0 0 60 344

D 281 0 31 0 312

Tot. 576 2 204 728 1510

Traffic Lane Flows Scenario 3: Lane Double Cycle Total AM

Junction: Unnamed Junction

1/1 173 (short)

1/2 841(In) (with short) 668(Out)

2/1 344

3/1 312(In) (with short) 281(Out)

3/2 31 (short)

4/1 13

5/1 204

6/1 2

7/1 576

8/1 728

Lane Saturation Flows Junction: Unnamed Junction

Lane Turning Nearside Allowed Turning Sat Flow Flared Sat Flow Lane Width Gradient Radius Lane Turns Prop. (PCU/Hr) (PCU/Hr) (m) (m)

Arm 5 Ahead Inf 98.8 % 1/1 3.00 0.00 Y 1912 1912 Arm 6 Left 10.00 1.2 %

1/2 3.00 0.00 N Arm 8 Right 15.00 100.0 % 1868 1868 Arm 6 Right 15.00 0.0 %

2/1 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 7 Ahead Inf 82.6 % 1866 1866

Arm 8 Left 10.00 17.4 %

3/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Left 12.00 100.0 % 1724 1724

Arm 5 Right 15.00 100.0 % 3/2 3.00 0.00 Y 1741 1741 Arm 6 Ahead Inf 0.0 % Arm 5 Left 10.00 15.4 %

4/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Right 15.00 84.6 % 1751 1751

Arm 8 Ahead Inf 0.0 %

5/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

6/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

7/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

8/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

Scenario 4: 'Double Cycle Total PM' (FG2: '2028 Total Development PM', Plan 2: 'Network Control Plan 2') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow : Destination

A B C D Tot.

A 0 9 278 234 521

B 3 0 2 0 5 Origin C 186 2 0 30 218

D 534 0 47 0 581

Tot. 723 11 327 264 1325

Traffic Lane Flows Scenario 4: Lane Double Cycle Total PM

Junction: Unnamed Junction

1/1 287 (short)

1/2 521(In) (with short) 234(Out)

2/1 218

3/1 581(In) (with short) 534(Out)

3/2 47 (short)

4/1 5

5/1 327

6/1 11

7/1 723

8/1 264

Lane Saturation Flows Junction: Unnamed Junction

Lane Turning Nearside Allowed Turning Sat Flow Flared Sat Flow Lane Width Gradient Radius Lane Turns Prop. (PCU/Hr) (PCU/Hr) (m) (m)

Arm 5 Ahead Inf 96.9 % 1/1 3.00 0.00 Y 1906 1906 Arm 6 Left 10.00 3.1 %

1/2 3.00 0.00 N Arm 8 Right 15.00 100.0 % 1868 1868

Arm 6 Right 15.00 0.9 % 2/1 3.00 0.00 Y Arm 7 Ahead Inf 85.3 % 1875 1875

Arm 8 Left 10.00 13.8 %

3/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Left 12.00 100.0 % 1724 1724

Arm 5 Right 15.00 100.0 % 3/2 3.00 0.00 Y 1741 1741 Arm 6 Ahead Inf 0.0 %

Arm 5 Left 10.00 40.0 % 4/1 3.25 0.00 Y Arm 7 Right 15.00 60.0 % 1732 1732

Arm 8 Ahead Inf 0.0 %

5/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

6/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

7/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

8/1 Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf

Scenario 1: 'Total AM' (FG1: '2028 Total Development AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram 1 Min: 7 3 Min: 5 4 Min: 6 A C

E J D F I H H

G

B 5 20s 8 45s 6 6s

Stage Timings Stage 1 3 4

Duration 20 45 6

Change Point 0 25 78

Signal Timings Diagram

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

0 25 78 1 5 : 20 3 8 : 45 4 6 : 6

A A B B C C D D E E

Phases F F G G H H I I J J

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Time in cycle (sec)

Network Results Lane Lane Controller Position In Arrow Total Green Arrow Demand Sat Flow Capacity Deg Sat Item Full Phase Num Greens Description Type Stream Filtered Route Phase (s) Green (s) Flow (pcu) (pcu/Hr) (pcu) (%)

Network - - N/A ------79.0%

Unnamed - - N/A ------79.0% Junction

Ahead Left 1/2+1/1 U N/A N/A C A 1 48:20 - 841 1868:1912 1065 79.0% Right

Right Ahead 2/1 O N/A N/A B 1 20 - 344 1866 435 79.0% Left

Right Ahead 3/1+3/2 U N/A N/A D E 1 59:7 52 312 1724:1741 1181 26.4% Left

Left Right 4/1 U N/A N/A F 1 7 - 13 1751 156 8.4% Ahead

Rand + Turners When Turners In Uniform Storage Area Total Av. Delay Max. Back of Rand + Mean Max Arriving Leaving Turners In Oversat Item Unopposed Intergreen Delay Uniform Delay Delay Per PCU Uniform Queue Oversat Queue (pcu) (pcu) Gaps (pcu) Delay (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (s/pcu) (pcu) Queue (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr)

Network - - 0 0 0 8.8 3.9 0.0 12.7 - - - -

Unnamed - - 0 0 0 8.8 3.9 0.0 12.7 - - - - Junction

1/2+1/1 841 841 - - - 4.8 1.8 - 6.6 28.3 15.1 1.8 16.9

2/1 344 344 0 0 0 3.1 1.8 0.0 4.9 51.4 8.0 1.8 9.8

3/1+3/2 312 312 - - - 0.8 0.2 - 1.0 11.2 2.7 0.2 2.9

4/1 13 13 - - - 0.1 0.0 - 0.2 50.4 0.3 0.0 0.3

C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 13.9 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 12.67 Cycle Time (s): 90 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 13.9 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 12.67

Scenario 2: 'Total PM' (FG2: '2028 Total Development PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram 1 Min: 7 3 Min: 5 4 Min: 6 A C

E J D F I H H

G

B 5 17s 8 15s 6 9s

Stage Timings Stage 1 3 4

Duration 17 15 9

Change Point 0 22 45

Signal Timings Diagram

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

0 22 45 1 5 : 17 3 8 : 15 4 6 : 9

A A B B C C D D E E

Phases F F G G H H I I J J

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Time in cycle (sec)

Network Results Lane Lane Controller Position In Arrow Total Green Arrow Demand Sat Flow Capacity Deg Sat Item Full Phase Num Greens Description Type Stream Filtered Route Phase (s) Green (s) Flow (pcu) (pcu/Hr) (pcu) (%)

Network - - N/A ------59.3%

Unnamed - - N/A ------59.3% Junction

Ahead Left 1/2+1/1 U N/A N/A C A 1 18:17 - 521 1868:1906 879 59.3% Right

Right Ahead 2/1 O N/A N/A B 1 17 - 218 1875 563 38.8% Left

Right Ahead 3/1+3/2 U N/A N/A D E 1 32:10 22 581 1724:1741 988 58.8% Left

Left Right 4/1 U N/A N/A F 1 10 - 5 1732 318 1.6% Ahead

Rand + Turners When Turners In Uniform Storage Area Total Av. Delay Max. Back of Rand + Mean Max Arriving Leaving Turners In Oversat Item Unopposed Intergreen Delay Uniform Delay Delay Per PCU Uniform Queue Oversat Queue (pcu) (pcu) Gaps (pcu) Delay (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (s/pcu) (pcu) Queue (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr)

Network - - 2 0 0 5.0 1.8 0.0 6.8 - - - -

Unnamed - - 2 0 0 5.0 1.8 0.0 6.8 - - - - Junction

1/2+1/1 521 521 - - - 2.4 0.7 - 3.1 21.7 3.9 0.7 4.6

2/1 218 218 2 0 0 1.0 0.3 0.0 1.3 21.9 2.8 0.3 3.2

3/1+3/2 581 581 - - - 1.6 0.7 - 2.3 14.2 5.8 0.7 6.5

4/1 5 5 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 26.2 0.1 0.0 0.1

C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 51.8 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 6.80 Cycle Time (s): 60 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 51.8 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 6.80

Scenario 3: 'Double Cycle Total AM' (FG1: '2028 Total Development AM', Plan 2: 'Network Control Plan 2') Stage Sequence Diagram 1 Min: 7 2 Min: 6 4 Min: 7 1 Min: 7 3 Min: 5 4 Min: 6 A C A A C

E E J D J D F F I I H H H H

G

B B 5 22s 6 60s 6 7s 5 18s 8 31s 6 6s

Stage Timings Stage 1 2 4 1 3 4

Duration 22 60 7 18 31 6

Change Point 0 27 93 106 129 168

Signal Timings Diagram

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

0 27 93 106 129 168 1 5 : 22 2 6 : 60 4 6 : 7 1 5 : 18 3 8 : 31 4 6 : 6

A A B B C C D D E E

Phases F F G G H H I I J J

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

Time in cycle (sec)

Network Results Lane Lane Controller Position In Arrow Total Green Arrow Demand Sat Flow Capacity Deg Sat Item Full Phase Num Greens Description Type Stream Filtered Route Phase (s) Green (s) Flow (pcu) (pcu/Hr) (pcu) (%)

Network - - N/A ------79.7%

Unnamed - - N/A ------79.7% Junction

Ahead Left 1/2+1/1 U N/A N/A C A 2 95:106 - 841 1868:1912 1055 79.7% Right

Right Ahead 2/1 O N/A N/A B 2 40 - 344 1866 435 79.0% Left

Right Ahead 3/1+3/2 U N/A N/A D E 2 118:15 103 312 1724:1741 1181 26.4% Left

Left Right 4/1 U N/A N/A F 2 14 - 13 1751 156 8.4% Ahead

Rand + Turners When Turners In Uniform Storage Area Total Av. Delay Max. Back of Rand + Mean Max Arriving Leaving Turners In Oversat Item Unopposed Intergreen Delay Uniform Delay Delay Per PCU Uniform Queue Oversat Queue (pcu) (pcu) Gaps (pcu) Delay (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (s/pcu) (pcu) Queue (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr)

Network - - 0 0 0 8.0 4.0 0.0 11.9 - - - -

Unnamed - - 0 0 0 8.0 4.0 0.0 11.9 - - - - Junction

1/2+1/1 841 841 - - - 3.8 1.9 - 5.7 24.5 16.2 1.9 18.1

2/1 344 344 0 0 0 3.2 1.8 0.0 5.0 52.7 9.7 1.8 11.5

3/1+3/2 312 312 - - - 0.8 0.2 - 1.0 11.4 3.0 0.2 3.1

4/1 13 13 - - - 0.1 0.0 - 0.2 51.8 0.4 0.0 0.4

C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 12.9 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 11.93 Cycle Time (s): 180 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 12.9 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 11.93

Scenario 4: 'Double Cycle Total PM' (FG2: '2028 Total Development PM', Plan 2: 'Network Control Plan 2') Stage Sequence Diagram 1 Min: 7 2 Min: 6 4 Min: 7 1 Min: 7 3 Min: 5 4 Min: 6 A C A A C

E E J D J D F F I I H H H H

G

B B 5 12s 6 41s 6 7s 5 13s 8 5s 6 6s

Stage Timings Stage 1 2 4 1 3 4

Duration 12 41 7 13 5 6

Change Point 0 17 64 77 95 108

Signal Timings Diagram

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

0 17 64 77 95 108 1 5 : 12 2 6 : 41 4 6 : 7 1 5 : 13 3 8 : 5 4 6 : 6

A A B B C C D D E E

Phases F F G G H H I I J J

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Time in cycle (sec)

Network Results Lane Lane Controller Position In Arrow Total Green Arrow Demand Sat Flow Capacity Deg Sat Item Full Phase Num Greens Description Type Stream Filtered Route Phase (s) Green (s) Flow (pcu) (pcu/Hr) (pcu) (%)

Network - - N/A ------52.0%

Unnamed - - N/A ------52.0% Junction

Ahead Left 1/2+1/1 U N/A N/A C A 2 50:72 - 521 1868:1906 1165 44.7% Right

Right Ahead 2/1 O N/A N/A B 2 25 - 218 1875 422 51.7% Left

Right Ahead 3/1+3/2 U N/A N/A D E 2 73:15 58 581 1724:1741 1117 52.0% Left

Left Right 4/1 U N/A N/A F 2 14 - 5 1732 231 2.2% Ahead

Rand + Turners When Turners In Uniform Storage Area Total Av. Delay Max. Back of Rand + Mean Max Arriving Leaving Turners In Oversat Item Unopposed Intergreen Delay Uniform Delay Delay Per PCU Uniform Queue Oversat Queue (pcu) (pcu) Gaps (pcu) Delay (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (pcuHr) (s/pcu) (pcu) Queue (pcu) (pcu) (pcuHr)

Network - - 2 0 0 3.8 1.5 0.0 5.3 - - - -

Unnamed - - 2 0 0 3.8 1.5 0.0 5.3 - - - - Junction

1/2+1/1 521 521 - - - 1.2 0.4 - 1.6 10.8 2.7 0.4 3.1

2/1 218 218 2 0 0 1.4 0.5 0.0 1.9 32.1 4.4 0.5 4.9

3/1+3/2 581 581 - - - 1.2 0.5 - 1.8 11.0 4.9 0.5 5.4

4/1 5 5 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 33.3 0.1 0.0 0.1

C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 73.1 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 5.33 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 73.1 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 5.33