DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of South Sudan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Republic of South Sudan CHOLERA RESPONSE UPDATES AS OF 12-August-2017 Coordination of cholera response Overall coordination of the cholera response at the national level is coordinated by the National cholera taskforce that meets weekly on Wednesdays from 2pm in the WHO conference hall in Juba. In addition, the cholera coordination meeting in Juba Teaching hospital convenes on Monday starting 11am and Friday starting 9am in the Postgraduate School. At the sub-national level, cholera taskforce committees are coordinating the cholera response in Yirol East and Yirol West, Nyirol, Uror, Tonj East, Kapoeta South, Kapoeta North, and Kapoeta East. Other non-affected states have also initiated cholera preparedness meetings in Aweil, Torit, Wau, Yambio, and Rumbek. Across the border in Sudan, the week 27, 2017 joint situation report by the Federal Ministry of Health and WHO showed that 15 out of the 18 states have been affected by acute watery diarrhoea with active transmission reported in Kassala, Blue Nile, River Nile, Gezira, Senar, Khartoum, Gedarif, Northern, White Nile, South Kordofan, North Kordofan, West Kordofan, North Darfur and East Darfur. All the states bordering South Sudan are affected. This therefore calls for enhanced preparedness in Renk, Western Bank of the Nile, Pariang, Abiemnhom, Abyei, Aweil East, Aweil North, and Raja counties. To enhance cross-border surveillance and response, cross-border meetings are planned starting with the South Sudan, Uganda, and Kenya meeting that is planned for next month in Nimule. Surveillance and case management updates New cholera alerts Berteth County (formerly Pibor): In Maruwa (Boma Payam), 17 people reported dead of suspected cholera between 7th and 9th August, 2017. WHO is working with the field teams and also in collaboration with MSF to conduct an assessment of the situation in the area. Raja County: In Katta, several people reported of severe dehydration and vomiting in the past week. An assessment team from Raja Project and ALIMA deployed to conduct investigation failed to reach the area because of insecurity on the road leading to Katta. The CHD and health partners in the area are planning for another deployment to the area. Akobo West County: In Wechjal and Boung, eight (8) suspect cholera cases were reported between 5th and 10th August. Nile Hope with support from WHO is conducting investigation and assessment of the situation. General cholera trends There is a general declining trends in cholera cases in the country over the past three weeks. The number of counties with active transmission remains at 10 namely; Kapoeta South, Kapoeta East, Kapoeta North, Tonj East, Yirol East, Yirol East, Nyirol, Ayod, Duk and Juba. However, Kapoeta South reported an increase in cases over the week with Kapoeta town reporting more cases. Similar declining trend is being reported in the Tonj East with transmission reported to have plummeted in Paweng and Makuach. However, a new hotspot has emerged in Marial lou, in Tonj North where suspect cholera cases have been reported. A cholera treatment unit has been established to manage cases. Low level transmission continues to be reported in Yirol East and Yirol West; in Uror (Pieri), and Nyirol (Lankien). In Juba, transmission in Don Bosco IDP camp is controlled following the first round of oral cholera vaccination from 3rd to 6th July 2017. Sporadic transmission continues from widespread areas including Gondokoro, Shirkat, Lologo, Gudele 2, Rock City, Kor William, and Nyakuron. Cholera response updates and field missions At least 50 cholera treatment facilities including cholera treatment centers and units; and oral rehydration points are currently operational in the areas with active cholera transmission. In Juba, HLSS has been supported by Unicef to establish 9 ORP sites in Al Sabbah hospital; Gurei; Kator; Lologo; Gumbo; Don Bosco, Kor Woliang, Nesitu, and Nyakuron. In Tonj East, there are currently seven (7) cholera treatment facilities (4-CTUs and 3-ORPs) The four CTUs are located in Makuac, Mapara, Paweng and Paliang payams while the ORPs are in Ager bac, Aliet and Aper num. Four more ORPs are proposed to be sited at Marial Lou where cholera has been confirmed, Wunbol, Gol guk and Pagour. One more CTU has been established in response to the case upsurge in Marial Lou. A total of 15 cholera treatment facilities have been set up in Kapoeta state, with Kapoeta South having 1CTC, 1CTU, and 1 ORP; Kapoeta East having 3CTUs and 3 ORPs; and Kapoeta North having 1 CTC and 5 ORPs. With support from UNICEF, a total of 16 cholera beds were delivered to Kapoeta State Hospital CTC (10 beds); Napotpot (3beds); and Narus (3beds). Due to the shortage of cholera kits, UNICEF is planning to deliver case management and WASH kits to support the cholera response activities in Kapoeta state. Tab.1: Cholera treatment facilities in highly active transmission counties Cholera treatment facilities by type Total State County CTC CTU ORP Kapoeta North 1 0 5 6 Kapoeta Kapoeta South 1 1 1 3 Kapoeta East 0 3 3 6 Tonj Tonj East 0 5 3 8 Jubek Juba 1 0 9 10 Total 3 9 21 33 Oral cholera vaccination Vaccination campaign in the four priority counties including Kapoeta North, Kapoeta South, Kapoeta East and Tonj East is now in a mop up stage. The vaccination campaign started on the 29th July, 2017 to the 4th August, 2017 in the Kapoeta state while in Tonj East the campaign started on the 5th August, 2017 and ended on the 12th August, 2017. A total of 500, 010 doses were deployed to cover a target of 500,000 people across the four counties. This brings the total OCV doses secured from ICG/GTFCC since the beginning of 2017 to 1,544,150. A total of 611,564 doses have been deployed during the first round and 161,321 doses deployed during the second round. Cholera cases have significantly reduced in areas, especially in sites where the OCV campaign have been conducted so far in 2017. Since the beginning of 2017, cholera vaccines have been deployed in Leer, Bor PoC, Malakal Town, Bentiu PoC, Mingkaman IDP settlement, Aburoc IDPs, Bentiu/Rubkona Town, Ayod (Pagil, Tar, Jiech, Karmun, Padek, and Kandak), Juba (Don Bosco IDPs), Kapoeta North, Kapoeta South, Kapoeta East and Tonj East and surrounding payams.( Ref. Tab.2) The next phase of the campaign will target the remaining four prioritized counties including Juba, Akobo/Uror, Lankien and Panyijiar with a target population of 395,940. An additional two million doses of oral cholera vaccines are required to mitigate the risk of cholera in high risk areas and to interrupt transmission in the areas with ongoing transmission. W.H.O is in the final stages of securing these additional doses to complement the ongoing cholera response. Table 2: Doses of Oral Cholera Vaccines deployed in 2017 by site Target First round Second round No Site pop. # vacc. %cov. # vacc. %cov. Drop Vacc. Dates Partner out 1 Leer 44,731 30,772 69 - - - 22-Feb-17 MedAir, WHO,UNICEF 2 Malakal Town 16,500 10,499 64 - - - 18-22 May MSF-E, WHO,UNICEF 3 Bor PoC 2,265 1,926 85 1,885 83 - 3-4 Apr/ HLSS, 26-29 Apr WHO,UNICEF 4 Mingkaman 111,278 68,512 62 42,296 38 - 12-26 May MedAir, 10-21 Jun WHO,UNICEF 5 Ayod Tar 19,400 15,649 81 - - - 9-22 May MedAir, WHO,UNICEF 6 Ayod Pagil 4,850 3,943 81 - - - 9-22 May MedAir, WHO,UNICEF 7 Bentiu PoC 112,924 72,514 64 77,603 69 - 5-10 May IOM, WHO, UNICEF 8 Rabkona &Bentiu 35,204 31,908 91 38,387 109 - 20-23 Jun IOM, WHO, town UNICEF 9 Aburoj IDPs 11,640 10,723 92 - - 20-22 May MSF-E, WHO,UNICEF Ayod (Jiech, 10 Karmun,Padek 15,000 11,140 74 - - - 22-25 Jun IOM, CMD, &Kandak) WHO, UNICEF MSF-H, 11 Juba Don Bosco IDPs 5,940 3,909 66 1150 19 - 3-6 Jul; 24- WHO,UNICEF 27 Jul WHO, 12 Tonj East 189,058 160,862 85 - - - 6-12 Aug UNICEF, IOM,CCM, THESO 13 Kapoeta North 141,520 44,438 31 - - - 29 Jul-4-Aug WHO, UNICEF, SCI 14 Kapoeta South 97,000 78,469 81 29 Jul-4-Aug WHO,UNICEF, ARC 15 Kapoeta East 97,000 66,300 68 29 Jul-4-Aug WHO, UNICEF, SCI Total doses deployed 2017 904,310 611,564 68 161,321 42 Fig.1: First Round OCV Vaccination Coverage in Four priority counties, 2017 Target Coverage % Coverage 1,000,000 90.0 85.1 350,069 900,000 80.9 80.0 800,000 70.0 68.4 66.7 700,000 60.0 600,000 50.0 500,000 40.0 Target/Coverage 400,000 160,862 % Coverage 31.4 30.0 300,000 44438 66,300 524,578 200,000 78,469 20.0 100,000 189,058 10.0 141,520 97,000 97,000 0 0.0 Kap-N Kap-S Kap-E Tonj-E Total Counties A total of 350,069 out of a target of 524,578 across the four counties were vaccinated, representing 67% of the target population vaccinated. Kapoeta South and Tonj East recorded slightly above 80%, that is, 80.9% and 84.7% respectively. Coverage for Kapoeta North was very low at just 31.4%. Partners will have to remobilize and also re-strategize and conduct a vigorous mop-up in the area. Similarly, Kapoeta East may have to also conduct mop-up exercise before the second round is rolled out. Kap= Kapoeta North, South, East and Tonj East Laboratory updates A total 662 samples of cholera have been tested of which 41.8% (277) have been confirmed positive for Vibrio cholerae.
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Peacebuilding- the Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan

    Strategic Peacebuilding- the Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan

    SPECIAL REPORT Strategic Peacebuilding The Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan The Cases of the SPLM Leadership Crisis (2013), the Military Standoff at General Malong’s House (2017), and the Wau Crisis (2016–17) NYATHON H. MAI JULY 2020 WEEKLY REVIEW June 7, 2020 The Boiling Frustrations in South Sudan Abraham A. Awolich outh Sudan’s 2018 peace agreement that ended the deadly 6-year civil war is in jeopardy, both because the parties to it are back to brinkmanship over a number S of mildly contentious issues in the agreement and because the implementation process has skipped over fundamental st eps in a rush to form a unity government. It seems that the parties, the mediators and guarantors of the agreement wereof the mind that a quick formation of the Revitalized Government of National Unity (RTGoNU) would start to build trust between the leaders and to procure a public buy-in. Unfortunately, a unity government that is devoid of capacity and political will is unable to address the fundamentals of peace, namely, security, basic services, and justice and accountability. The result is that the citizens at all levels of society are disappointed in RTGoNU, with many taking the law, order, security, and survival into their own hands due to the ubiquitous absence of government in their everyday lives. The country is now at more risk of becoming undone at its seams than any other time since the liberation war ended in 2005. The current st ate of affairs in the country has been long in the making.
  • IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021

    IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021

    IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021 This IRNA Report is a product of Inter-Agency Assessment mission conducted and information compiled based on the inputs provided by partners on the ground including; government authorities, affected communities/IDPs and agencies. Yirol west county is located in lakes state, bordering Rumbek East to the north, Yirol East county to East, Terekeka to west and Awerial county to the south. The inhabitants of this county are Atuot and Apaak with major six subsections. Languages spoken are Thokrel and Dinka. These communities are subsistent farmers and pastoralists. However, majority of these IDPs lost their belongings livestock, food, and nonfood item. It has several Payams as follows; Anuol Payam, Geng-geng Payam, Aluakluak, Abang Payam, Geer, Yirol town payam and Mapuordit Payam. The following mentioned Organizations took part in the assessment done in Yirol West county Jointly initiated by Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (RRC) in Yirol west office. Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), CUAM, HELP, Catholic Relief Service (CRS), PLAN INTERNATIONAL, Solidarity Ministries Africa for Reconciliation and Development (SMARD), Women Aid Vision (WAV), ministry of health, ICAP, AAA, AVSI, AMA, Caritas and TOCH. The assessment was done on 20-05-2021 in two Payams of Yirol west namely Yirol West town and Geng-geng locations. Yirol town has greater number of newly displaced IDPs leading by 1,600 households and Geng- geng with 413 households and Mapuordit with 300 IDPs households. The humanitarian joint assessment was not possible in Mapuordit due to some logistic challenges. According to the RRC report, the total number of IDPs in both Yirol town, Geng-geng and Mapuordit was 2313 households displaced from Anuol Payam of Yirol west county.
  • Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1

    Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1

    FSL Cluster Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1 27°0'0"E 30°0'0"E Disclaimer The boundaries and and names shown and the designations used on this map do not Abyei imply offical endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations or the Government U of South Sudan. For any comment please contact: F S L - c l u st e r- s s d @ fa o . o r g n it Data sources y H! * Administrative boundaries were obtained courtesy of IMU OCHA; State capitals * Kind of interventions are provided by FSL Cluster partners ! H Undetermined boundary 13 Bentiu Twic Primary roads N N " " 0 0 ' Secondary roads ' 0 0 ° ° 9 l 9 za ha Gogrial East Tertiary roads l G r e ah Rivers B ern H! rth Abyei administrative area No Aweil t s International boundary e 6 11 Warrap W l South Sudan states a i 8 r g South Sudan counties J o o G n Waterbg ody/marsh l H! Tonj North e Kuajok Grazingi areas Type of intervention Food assistance and livestock interventions Tonj East Food assistance, livestock, income & employment, value addition/markets, and Intervening Partners' by County H! 5 agriculture interventions County Livestock Gogrial East FAO, VSF Suisse Wau Gogrial West FAO, VSF Suisse * Figures indicate number of partners Tonj East VSF Belgium, FAO, VSF Suisse Tonj North VSF Belgium, FAO, VSF Suisse Tonj South FAO, VSF Suisse Scale 1: 665,360 Twic FAO, VSF Suisse 7 Map Paper Size: A1 ¬ Map created: June 2012 County Income/Employment Value Addition/Markets Gogrial East FAO, VSF Germany VSF Germany Gogrial West NRC, FAO, NPA FAO Sudan Tonj East Tonj South
  • The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector

    The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector

    The Criminalization of South Sudan’s Gold Sector Kleptocratic Networks and the Gold Trade in Kapoeta By the Enough Project April 2020* A Precious Resource in an Arid Land Within the area historically known as the state of Eastern Equatoria, Kapoeta is a semi-arid rangeland of clay soil dotted with short, thorny shrubs and other vegetation.1 Precious resources lie below this desolate landscape. Eastern Equatoria, along with the region historically known as Central Equatoria, contains some of the most important and best-known sites for artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM). Some estimates put the number of miners at 60,000 working at 80 different locations in the area, including Nanaknak, Lauro (Didinga Hills), Napotpot, and Namurnyang. Locals primarily use traditional mining techniques, panning for gold from seasonal streams in various villages. The work provides miners’ families resources to support their basic needs.2 Kapoeta’s increasingly coveted gold resources are being smuggled across the border into Kenya with the active complicity of local and national governments. This smuggling network, which involves international mining interests, has contributed to increased militarization.3 Armed actors and corrupt networks are fueling low-intensity conflicts over land, particularly over the ownership of mining sites, and causing the militarization of gold mining in the area. Poor oversight and conflicts over the control of resources between the Kapoeta government and the national government in Juba enrich opportunistic actors both inside and outside South Sudan. Inefficient regulation and poor gold outflows have helped make ASM an ideal target for capture by those who seek to finance armed groups, perpetrate violence, exploit mining communities, and exacerbate divisions.
  • South Sudan's

    South Sudan's

    Untapped and Unprepared Dirty Deals Threaten South Sudan’s Mining Sector April 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Invitation to Exploitation 4 Beneath the Battlefield: Mineral Development During Conflict 12 Indications of Possible Money Laundering 19 Recommendations 20 We are grateful for the support we receive from our donors who have helped make our work possible. To learn more about The Sentry’s funders, please visit The Sentry website at www.thesentry.org/about/. UNTAPPED AND UNPREPARED: DIRTY DEALS THREATEN SOUTH SUDAN’S MINING SECTOR TheSentry.org Executive Summary South Sudan’s mining sector has seen rapid development in recent years, and preliminary reports suggest that the industry could become an engine for major economic growth. However, ineffective accountability mechanisms, an opaque corporate landscape, and inadequate due diligence have exposed the sector to abuse by bad actors within South Sudan’s ruling clique. The Sentry has found that existing laws have proven insufficient bulwarks against abuse, raising concerns that the country’s mineral wealth could do little more than spur the kind of violent competition that has ravaged the oil sector. Although South Sudan took welcome steps to reform the mining sector in 2012, some government officials, their relatives, and their close associates have fostered a weak regulatory environment susceptible to exploitation. In one example of how the privileged few have apparently exploited kleptocratic arrangements, President Salva Kiir’s daughter partly owns a company with three active licenses, while another company with three licenses lists former Vice President James Wani Igga’s son as a shareholder. Ashraf Seed Ahmed Hussein Ali, a businessman commonly known as Al-Cardinal who was placed under Global Magnitsky sanctions in October 2019, reportedly owns the company currently holding the greatest number of licenses.1 In the gold-rich region of Kapoeta, state government officials have begun issuing licenses independently of the central government.
  • Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the Market of Mayen Rual South Sudan Customary Authorities Project

    Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the Market of Mayen Rual South Sudan Customary Authorities Project

    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT WARTIME TRADE AND THE RESHAPING OF POWER IN SOUTH SUDAN LEARNING FROM THE MARKET OF MAYEN RUAL SOUTH SUDAN customary authorities pROjECT Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the market of Mayen Rual NAOMI PENDLE AND CHirrilo MADUT ANEI Published in 2018 by the Rift Valley Institute PO Box 52771 GPO, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya 107 Belgravia Workshops, 159/163 Marlborough Road, London N19 4NF, United Kingdom THE RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in eastern and central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. THE AUTHORS Naomi Pendle is a Research Fellow in the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics. Chirrilo Madut Anei is a graduate of the University of Bahr el Ghazal and is an emerging South Sudanese researcher. SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT RVI’s South Sudan Customary Authorities Project seeks to deepen the understand- ing of the changing role of chiefs and traditional authorities in South Sudan. The SSCA Project is supported by the Swiss Government. CREDITS RVI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Mark Bradbury RVI ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS: Cedric Barnes RVI SOUTH SUDAN PROGRAMME MANAGER: Anna Rowett RVI SENIOR PUBLICATIONS AND PROGRAMME MANAGER: Magnus Taylor EDITOR: Kate McGuinness DESIGN: Lindsay Nash MAPS: Jillian Luff,MAPgrafix ISBN 978-1-907431-56-2 COVER: Chief Morris Ngor RIGHTS Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2018 Cover image © Silvano Yokwe Alison Text and maps published under Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Available for free download from www.riftvalley.net Printed copies are available from Amazon and other online retailers.
  • Resident Coordinator Support Office, Upper Nile State Briefing Pack

    Resident Coordinator Support Office, Upper Nile State Briefing Pack

    Resident Coordinator Support Office, Upper Nile State Briefing Pack Table of Contents Page No. Table of Contents 1 State Map 2 Overview 3 Security and Political History 3 Major Conflicts 4 State Government Structure 6 Recovery and Development 7 State Resident Coordinator’s Support Office 8 Organizations Operating in the State 9-11 1 Map of Upper Nile State 2 Overview The state of Upper Nile has an area of 77,773 km2 and an estimated population of 964,353 (2009 population census). With Malakal as its capital, the state has 13 counties with Akoka being the most recent. Upper Nile shares borders with Southern Kordofan and Unity in the west, Ethiopia and Blue Nile in the east, Jonglei in the south, and White Nile in the north. The state has four main tribes: Shilluk (mainly in Panyikang, Fashoda and Manyo Counties), Dinka (dominant in Baliet, Akoka, Melut and Renk Counties), Jikany Nuer (in Nasir and Ulang Counties), Gajaak Nuer (in Longochuk and Maiwut), Berta (in Maban County), Burun (in Maban and Longochok Counties), Dajo in Longochuk County and Mabani in Maban County. Security and Political History Since inception of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), Upper Nile State has witnessed a challenging security and political environment, due to the fact that it was the only state in Southern Sudan that had a Governor from the National Congress Party (NCP). (The CPA called for at least one state in Southern Sudan to be given to the NCP.) There were basically three reasons why Upper Nile was selected amongst all the 10 states to accommodate the NCP’s slot in the CPA arrangements.
  • National Education Statistics

    National Education Statistics

    2016 NATIONAL EDUCATION STATISTICS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FEBRUARY 2017 www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education & Instruction 2017 Photo Courtesy of UNICEF This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. The map used in this document is not the official maps of the Republic of South Sudan and are for illustrative purposes only. This publication has been produced with financial assistance from the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) and technical assistance from Altai Consulting. Soft copies of the complete National and State Education Statistic Booklets, along with the EMIS baseline list of schools and related documents, can be accessed and downloaded at: www.southsudanemis.org. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director of Planning and Budgeting / MoGEI [email protected] Giir Mabior Cyerdit / EMIS Manager / MoGEI [email protected] Data & Statistics Unit / MoGEI [email protected] Nor Shirin Md. Mokhtar / Chief of Education / UNICEF [email protected] Akshay Sinha / Education Officer / UNICEF [email protected] Daniel Skillings / Project Director / Altai Consulting [email protected] Philibert de Mercey / Senior Methodologist / Altai Consulting [email protected] FOREWORD On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am delighted to present The National Education Statistics Booklet, 2016, of the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). It is the 9th in a series of publications initiated in 2006, with only one interruption in 2014, a significant achievement for a new nation like South Sudan. The purpose of the booklet is to provide a detailed compilation of statistical information covering key indicators of South Sudan’s education sector, from ECDE to Higher Education.

  • CRP on the Report of the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan in English2

    United Nations A/HRC/37/CRP.2 General Assembly Distr.: Restricted 23 February 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-seventh session Agenda item 4 Human Rights Situations that require the attention of the Council Report of the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan* * The information contained in this document should be read in conjunction with the report of the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan (A/HRC/37/71). GE. CRP on the Report of the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan in English2 Contents Page I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Mandate/Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 3 A. Mandate ......................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 4 C. The Commission’s work .................................................................................................................. 6 III. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 7 A. Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (2015)..................... 7 B. Breakdown
  • Village Assessment Survey Wau County

    Village Assessment Survey Wau County

    Village Assessment Survey COUNTY ATLAS 2013 Wau County Western Bahr el Ghazal State Village Assessment Survey The Village Assessment Survey (VAS) has been used by IOM since 2007 and is a comprehensive data source for South Sudan that provides detailed information on access to basic services, infra- structure and other key indicators essential to informing the development of efficient reintegra- tion programmes. The most recent VAS represents IOM’s largest effort to date encompassing 30 priority counties comprising of 871 bomas, 197 payams, 468 health facilities, and 1,277 primary schools. There was a particular emphasis on assessing payams outside state capitals, where com- paratively fewer comprehensive assessments have been carried out. IOM conducted the assess- ment in priority counties where an estimated 72% of the returnee population (based on esti- mates as of 2012) has resettled. The county atlas provides spatial data at the boma level and should be used in conjunction with the VAS county profile. All Counties Assessed Planning Map and Dashboard..…………Page 1 WASH Section…………..………...Page 14 - 20 General Section…………...……...Page 2 - 5 Natural Source of Water……...……….…..Page 14 Main Ethnicities and Languages.………...Page 2 Water Point and Physical Accessibility….…Page 15 Infrastructure and Services……...............Page 3 Water Management & Conflict....….………Page 16 Land Ownership and Settlement Type ….Page 4 WASH Education...….……………….…….Page 17 Returnee Land Allocation Status..……...Page 5 Latrine Type and Use...………....………….Page 18 Livelihood
  • Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN

    Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN

    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Gov- ernment agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advises the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project, supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state and county levels. The consultation process was led by the Government of South Sudan, with support from the Govern- ment of the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Cover photo: A senior chief from Upper Nile. © UNDP/Sun-ra Lambert Baj COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State South Sudan Published by South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ..........................................................................................................................
  • Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)

    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)

    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) he first integrated water resource management (IWRM) project of its kind in South Sudan, Water Water for Eastern for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) was launched in Components 2013 as part of the broader bilateral water Tprogramme funded through the Dutch Multiannual Equatoria (W4EE) Strategic Plan for South Sudan (2012–2015). W4EE focuses on three interrelated From the very beginning, W4EE was planned as a pilot components: IWRM programme in the Torit and Kapoeta States of The role of integrated water resource manage- Eastern Equatoria focusing on holistic management of the ment in fostering resilience, delivering economic Kenneti catchment, conflict-sensitive oversight of water Component 1: Integrated water resource management of the development, improving health, and promoting for productive use such as livestock and farming, and Kenneti catchment and surrounds peace in a long-term process. improved access to safe drinking water as well as sanitati- on and hygiene. The goal has always been to replicate key Component 2: Conflict-sensitive management of water for learnings and best practice in other parts of South Sudan. productive use contributes to increased, sustained productivity, value addition in agriculture, horticulture, and livestock The Kenneti catchment is very important to the Eastern Equatoria region for economic, social, and biodiversity reasons. The river has hydropower potential, supports the Component 3: Safely managed and climate-resilient drinking livelihoods of thousands of households, and the surroun- water services and improved sanitation and hygiene are available, ding area hosts a national park with forests and wetlands operated and maintained in a sustainable manner. as well as wild animals and migratory birds.