Land Tenure Issues in Southern Sudan: Key Findings and Recommendations for Southern Sudan Land Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land Tenure Issues in Southern Sudan: Key Findings and Recommendations for Southern Sudan Land Policy LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY DECEMBER 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD. LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY THE RESULTS OF A RESEARCH COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE SUDAN PROPERTY RIGHTS PROGRAM AND THE NILE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DECEMBER 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgements Page i Scoping Paper Section A Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla Jurisdiction of GOSS, State, County, and Customary Authorities over Land Section B Administration, Planning, and Allocation: Juba County, Central Equatoria State Lomoro Robert Bullen Land Tenure and Property Rights in Southern Sudan: A Case Study of Section C Informal Settlements in Juba Gabriella McMichael Customary Authority and Traditional Authority in Southern Sudan: A Case Study Section D of Juba County Wani Mathias Jumi Conflict Over Resources Among Rural Communities in Southern Sudan Section E Andrew Athiba Synthesis Paper Section F Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The USAID Sudan Property Rights Program has supported the Southern Sudan Land Commission in its efforts to undertake consultation and research on land tenure and property rights issues; the findings of these initiatives were used to draft a land policy that is meant to be both legitimate and relevant to the needs of Southern Sudanese citizens and legal rights-holders. The Southern Sudan Land Commission recognized the importance of engaging Southern Sudanese academic institutions in undertaking land tenure and property rights research and recommended that the Sudan Property Rights Program collaborate with the Nile Institute to research key topics. The reports presented in this document are the result of several months of hard work by both the Nile Institute and the teams contracted to undertake this research. Southern Sudan poses particular challenges to researchers, both logistical and political, particularly when focusing upon the sensitive topic of land. Despite these challenges, the Nile Institute and research teams have produced important findings and recommendations that will add to the body of literature on land tenure and property rights in Southern Sudan and complement the results of public consultation, providing empirical evidence upon which to base aspects of Southern Sudan’s land policy. The USAID Sudan Property Rights Program recognizes and commends the Nile Institute and research teams for their perseverance and hard work to produce this research. LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN i SCOPING PAPER: LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SOUTHERN SUDAN DECEMBER 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD. SCOPING PAPER: LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN DECEMBER 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. A-I ACRONYMS .............................................................................................. A-II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................... A-III INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... A-1 STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 CUSTOMARY LAND TENURE SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN SUDAN ................................................................................................ A-3 2.0 RELATIONS BETWEEN GOVERNMENTS AND TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES OVER LAND .............................. A-5 3.0 URBAN LAND MANAGEMENT AND THE QUESTION OF INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS ............................................................ A-7 3.1 URBAN PLANNING IN SUDAN ........................................................................... A-7 3.2 INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS .................................................................................... A-8 4.0 RESETTLEMENT OF RETURNEES ............................................... A-10 5.0 RESTITUTION OF LAND AND PROPERTY ............................... A-11 6.0 VULNERABLE GROUPS ................................................................. A-13 7.0 WOMEN’S RIGHTS TO ACCESS LAND AND PROPERTY ..... A-14 8.0 INVESTORS’ (LOCAL & FOREIGN) ACCESS TO LAND ......... A-16 9.0 CONFLICTS OVER RESOURCES ................................................. A-18 10.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS ............................................................. A-20 REFERENCES ........................................................................................... A-21 ANNEX 1: RESEARCH THEMES AND QUESTIONS ........................ A-23 LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN A-i ACRONYMS CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement FDI Foreign Direct Investment GOS Government of Sudan GOSS Government of Southern Sudan IDPs Internally displaced Persons ICS Interim Constitution of Sudan ICSS Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan LTPR Land Tenure and Property Right Research NGOs Nongovernmental Organizations NISPDS Nile Institute of Strategic Policy and Development Studies NPA Norwegians People’s Aid NRC Norwegian Refugees Council SAAR Secretariat for Agriculture and Animal Resources SPLA Sudan Peoples’ Liberation Army SPLM Sudan Peoples’ Liberation Movement SPLM/A Sudan Peoples’ Liberation Movement/Army SPRP Sudan Property Right Program SSLA Southern Sudan Legislative Assembly SSLC Southern Sudan Land Commission UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees USAID United States Agency for International Development A-ii LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Different institutions and people have contributed to the completion of this scoping paper. Foremost amongst them is the USAID Sudan Property Rights Program (SPRP), which contracted NISPDS to undertake research into land and property rights issues in Southern Sudan. A first step in this process is the preparation of this Scoping Paper. Among those who have worked closely with us while preparing this scoping paper are: the present and former Chief of Party, Dr. Steven Lawry and Mr. David Scribner, respectively; Peter Giampaoli for providing valuable documents and making useful comments to enhance the paper; and Nelson Marongwe, Technical Advisor, for making useful suggestions, particularly on research section. We also thank Ms. Monica Sanchez of NRC for the providing useful materials on land issues. Special thanks goes to H.E. Robert Benjamin Lowki, the Chairman of GOSS Land Commission, for encouraging the contribution of local academic institutions the process of land policy development in Southern Sudan. In this regard, we would also like to recognize the contribution of Dr. Michael Ruth of Tetra Tech ARD for taking time to come and develop with us the road map for the collaboration between NISPDS and SPRP. Finally, we acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Alfred Sebit Lokuji for making valuable suggestions and editorial comments on the paper. We take the burden for all errors. Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla Kennedy Crispo Galla LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN A-iii INTRODUCTION The nascent Government of Southern Sudan (GOSS) has come into existence when globalization and liberalization are the defining principles for the management of national economies and resources. These imperatives present critical challenges to the new administration, especially in the light of the acknowledged land and natural wealth of Southern Sudan.1 Recognizing the central importance of land to the people of Southern Sudan, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) mandated the establishment of the Southern Sudan Land Commission (SSLC) to address the issues of land tenure and property rights in Southern Sudan. This new organization is faced with daunting challenges of how to resolve differences in expectations about land-use at all levels, from the national government down to communities. The Land Commission first developed the Southern Sudan Land Bill, which was passed into an Act by the Southern Sudan Legislative Assembly (SSLA) in January 2009. What is envisaged to follow is the formulation of land policy and laws, which is a long-term undertaking, requiring wide consultations with the communities at large and will be supported by evidence-based research. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has contracted Tetra Tech ARD to collaborate with the SSLC through the Southern Sudan Property Rights Program (SPRP), in order to assist the GOSS in development of a land policy. The SPRP and SSLC have convened consultation workshops in each of Southern Sudan’s ten states. They are continuing to implement a program of consultation and land tenure and property rights (LTPR) research to inform the process of land policy development. To pursue the research aspect, the SPRP has subcontracted the Nile Institute of Strategic Policy and Development Studies (NISPDS), a national think tank,
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Peacebuilding- the Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan
    SPECIAL REPORT Strategic Peacebuilding The Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan The Cases of the SPLM Leadership Crisis (2013), the Military Standoff at General Malong’s House (2017), and the Wau Crisis (2016–17) NYATHON H. MAI JULY 2020 WEEKLY REVIEW June 7, 2020 The Boiling Frustrations in South Sudan Abraham A. Awolich outh Sudan’s 2018 peace agreement that ended the deadly 6-year civil war is in jeopardy, both because the parties to it are back to brinkmanship over a number S of mildly contentious issues in the agreement and because the implementation process has skipped over fundamental st eps in a rush to form a unity government. It seems that the parties, the mediators and guarantors of the agreement wereof the mind that a quick formation of the Revitalized Government of National Unity (RTGoNU) would start to build trust between the leaders and to procure a public buy-in. Unfortunately, a unity government that is devoid of capacity and political will is unable to address the fundamentals of peace, namely, security, basic services, and justice and accountability. The result is that the citizens at all levels of society are disappointed in RTGoNU, with many taking the law, order, security, and survival into their own hands due to the ubiquitous absence of government in their everyday lives. The country is now at more risk of becoming undone at its seams than any other time since the liberation war ended in 2005. The current st ate of affairs in the country has been long in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021
    IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021 This IRNA Report is a product of Inter-Agency Assessment mission conducted and information compiled based on the inputs provided by partners on the ground including; government authorities, affected communities/IDPs and agencies. Yirol west county is located in lakes state, bordering Rumbek East to the north, Yirol East county to East, Terekeka to west and Awerial county to the south. The inhabitants of this county are Atuot and Apaak with major six subsections. Languages spoken are Thokrel and Dinka. These communities are subsistent farmers and pastoralists. However, majority of these IDPs lost their belongings livestock, food, and nonfood item. It has several Payams as follows; Anuol Payam, Geng-geng Payam, Aluakluak, Abang Payam, Geer, Yirol town payam and Mapuordit Payam. The following mentioned Organizations took part in the assessment done in Yirol West county Jointly initiated by Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (RRC) in Yirol west office. Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), CUAM, HELP, Catholic Relief Service (CRS), PLAN INTERNATIONAL, Solidarity Ministries Africa for Reconciliation and Development (SMARD), Women Aid Vision (WAV), ministry of health, ICAP, AAA, AVSI, AMA, Caritas and TOCH. The assessment was done on 20-05-2021 in two Payams of Yirol west namely Yirol West town and Geng-geng locations. Yirol town has greater number of newly displaced IDPs leading by 1,600 households and Geng- geng with 413 households and Mapuordit with 300 IDPs households. The humanitarian joint assessment was not possible in Mapuordit due to some logistic challenges. According to the RRC report, the total number of IDPs in both Yirol town, Geng-geng and Mapuordit was 2313 households displaced from Anuol Payam of Yirol west county.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • In Search for an Identity
    In search for an identity The processes of identity formation of South Sudanese in two post- independence internal conflicts analyzed via electronic sources ResMA Area Studies: Middle Eastern Studies, Leiden University Supervisors: dr. B. Soares, prof. dr. P. Sijpesteijn Kevin Klerx (1091174) August 7, 2016 1 Preface Writing a thesis for your research master should be a satiating project. It combines everything you have learned in your area of discipline, all the theories and skills that you have gained through the years of the study and gives you one masterpiece which you can be proud off. It has to be like this, but things never go the way you planned. My thesis was an ambitious project in which I put a lot of work. The original idea, to conduct fieldwork on the topic of national identity in South Sudan was something that was not done before in this context. Months of research and preparation for this fieldwork were almost literally flushed away when the civil war broke out in Juba on December 15, 2013. My ticket to Juba was scheduled on December 22, only one week later. While the civil war could have motivated me to go on with my thesis because it more or less confirmed the relevance of my subject, it did not. It was a struggle to redefine my research and to regain the motivation and ambition that I had before. While ending this thesis I felt relieved that this project had come to an end. At a certain point, it was hard for me to find motivation and the see the light at the end of the tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • EWARN Disease Surveillance Highlights World Health Organization 1 January to 9 August 2015 South Sudan NEW DISEASE OUTBREAKS, JANUARY to AUGUST 2015 Hepatitis E
    Since the beginning of 2015, measles outbreaks have been conrmed in Duk, Rubkona, and Renk Counties. In addition, there are three Hepatitis E Virus outbreaks that started last year in Mingkaman and Bentiu PoC. The HEV cases have declined in Mingkaman with only sporadic cases reported currently. However, the outbreak in Bentiu PoC has ared up in the recent weeks due to an upsurge in new arrivals into the PoC. A malaria upsurge was reported in Bentiu PoC starting mid June 2015. Since the beginning of 2015, cholera has been conrmed in three counties [Ikotos, Juba, and Bor]. EWARN Disease Surveillance Highlights World Health Organization 1 January to 9 August 2015 South Sudan NEW DISEASE OUTBREAKS, JANUARY TO AUGUST 2015 Hepatitis E Bentiu in Unity States IDP CONSULTATIONS Malaria Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) was conrmed 32,910 27 553,287 Cases Deaths Bentiu in Unity States Polio Virus type Since week 23 of 2015, malaria in Bentiu PoC surpassed ARI as the top cause of morbidity. Measles The current trends consistent with a malaria upsurge Cases 0 Deaths Cholera WHO has continued to support implementing partners to 9 Cases 0 Deaths Duk in Jongei States 1 Mayom in Unity States Conrmed case an 11-month-old female from Wangkei Payam, 130 1 provide essential healthcare services to displaced populations Three measles IgM positive cases; outbreak Mayom with no history of vaccination. In response three rounds Cases Deaths Bor in Jonglei States controlled after vaccination campaign by SMC of Short interval additional dose campaigns and two rounds of Most
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Bari History
    SOME ASPECTS OF BARI HISTORY A Comparative linguistic and Oral Tradition Reconstruction Bureng G.V. Nyombe ~~\IIIlrn1 f.':~NA.JJJ.fJllll!M.Q>1lOOJiiJIif'ir." ~/ ,,~.hx lltii.ow ---__.J University of Nairobi Press Contents List of Tables, Figures and Diagrams ix Foreword xi Acknowledgements xv Introduction 1 1. TheBari:GeographicalDistribution 5 Socio-economic organization 5 Pastoral life 7 Agriculture 11 Ownership of gardens and allocation of produce 12 2. languageFamily 15 Genetic classification 19 Typological classification 19 Areal classification 20 Diffusion and migration 20 J. languageandRace 2J Formation of the plural from the singular.. 28 Formation of the singular from the plural.; 29 The article 29 Numerals 30 The copula 3 1 Hamites: myth or reality 34 Current status of Nil otic languages 37 VI 4. Bariin Pre-History J9 Migration vs diffusion 44 Migration of Nilotes 47 5. Bsri Migration 51 Migration from the East.. 53 The Bari migrated from the North 55 The Bari-speakers: myth or reality 61 Cultural difference 69 o. TheBsri Before the Invasion (1500-1840) 71 Early settlement 71 'Yoyok (about 1565-1585) 74 The expulsion of the Pari from Liria 75 Lomijikotet (about 1585-1605) 76 Lokoro (about 1605-1625) 77 Kuwuba (about 1625-1645) 77 Pintong (about 1645-1665) .......................•........................... 77 Pitnong and Lokuryeje 77 Tombe Lokureje (about 1665-1685): The golden age in Bariland 80 Modi Lokuryeje (about 1685-1705) 81 Tome Modi (1705-1725) 82 Modi (1725-1745) 82 The split of Sindiru (c.1745-l815) 82 Split of Sindiru and the Bilinyang rain dynasty (1765-1785): Subek-lo-Jada 83 Sindiru about 1500 (an illustration) 85 Jangara (1785-1815) 85 Pitya-lo-Jangara (1815-1845) 86 The decline ofSindiru (1845-1885) 88 Arabs in Sindiru (1885-1889) 90 Wani (1885-1897) 91 vii 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 60 Years after the Enactment of the Indian Country Statute - What Was, What Is, and What Should Be Winter 2008 The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias William Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William Wood, The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 317 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss2/1 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wood: The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villa THE TRAJECTORY OF INDIAN COUNTRY IN CALIFORNIA: RANCHERIAS, VILLAGES, PUEBLOS, MISSIONS, RANCHOS, RESERVATIONS, COLONIES, AND RANCHERIAS William Wood* 1. INTRODUCTION This article examines the path, or trajectory,1 of Indian country in California. More precisely, it explores the origin and historical development over the last three centuries of a legal principle and practice under which a particular, protected status has been extended to land areas belonging to and occupied by indigenous peoples in what is now California. The examination shows that ever since the Spanish first established a continuing presence in California in 1769, the governing colonial regime has accorded Indian lands such status.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Social Permutations of Water Commodification in Blantyre City, Malawi
    Hydro-Social Permutations of Water Commodification in Blantyre City, Malawi A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 Isaac M.K. Tchuwa School of Environment Education and Development Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Tables ................................................................................................................... 7 List of Graphs ................................................................................................................. 7 List of Photos .................................................................................................................. 8 List of Maps .................................................................................................................... 9 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 10 Declaration .................................................................................................................... 11 Copyright Statement .................................................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)
    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) he first integrated water resource management (IWRM) project of its kind in South Sudan, Water Water for Eastern for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) was launched in Components 2013 as part of the broader bilateral water Tprogramme funded through the Dutch Multiannual Equatoria (W4EE) Strategic Plan for South Sudan (2012–2015). W4EE focuses on three interrelated From the very beginning, W4EE was planned as a pilot components: IWRM programme in the Torit and Kapoeta States of The role of integrated water resource manage- Eastern Equatoria focusing on holistic management of the ment in fostering resilience, delivering economic Kenneti catchment, conflict-sensitive oversight of water Component 1: Integrated water resource management of the development, improving health, and promoting for productive use such as livestock and farming, and Kenneti catchment and surrounds peace in a long-term process. improved access to safe drinking water as well as sanitati- on and hygiene. The goal has always been to replicate key Component 2: Conflict-sensitive management of water for learnings and best practice in other parts of South Sudan. productive use contributes to increased, sustained productivity, value addition in agriculture, horticulture, and livestock The Kenneti catchment is very important to the Eastern Equatoria region for economic, social, and biodiversity reasons. The river has hydropower potential, supports the Component 3: Safely managed and climate-resilient drinking livelihoods of thousands of households, and the surroun- water services and improved sanitation and hygiene are available, ding area hosts a national park with forests and wetlands operated and maintained in a sustainable manner. as well as wild animals and migratory birds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concepts of Enclave and Exclave and Their Use
    www.ssoar.info The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Yuri Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Y. (2013). The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region. Baltic Region, 2, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2013-2-11 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-351079 RESEARCH REPORTS This article focuses on the genesis of THE CONCEPTS and correlation between the related con- OF ENCLAVE cepts of enclave and exclave and the scope of their use in different sciences, fields of AND EXCLAVE knowledge, and everyday speech. The au- thor examines the circumstances of their AND THEIR USE emergence in the reference and professional IN THE POLITICAL literature in the Russian language. Special attention is paid to the typology of the AND GEOGRAPHICAL world’s enclave territories as objects of po- CHARACTERISTIC litical geography; at the same time, their new categories and divisions (international OF THE KALININGRAD enclave, overseas exclaves, internal en- claves of different levels) are extended and REGION introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Return and Reintegration of Sudanese Refugees to Southern Sudan
    Return and Reintegration of Sudanese Refugees to Southern Sudan REVISED SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL January 2004 – December 2005 Home beckons for these Sudanese refugees in Uganda. © UNHCR I. INTRODUCTION period up to 31 December 2004. The estimated funding requirements for planned activities during Decades of armed conflict in southern Sudan January – December 2005 are USD 60 million, have resulted in over 500,000 Sudanese fleeing thereby bringing the total two–year budget to USD into neighbouring countries of Uganda, Ethiopia, 89.9 million. UNHCR will reflect these revised Kenya, the Democratic Republic of the Congo project needs in the 2004 Inter-agency (DRC), Central African Republic (CAR) and Egypt. Consolidated Appeal for the Sudan Assistance The conflict also internally displaced about four Programme (ASAP). million persons. With the funds being requested, it will become In 2002, renewed peace talks launched in possible to strengthen UNHCR’s present capacity Machakos, Kenya, under the auspices of the to support the planned repatriation and Inter-Governmental Authority on Development reintegration activities in southern Sudan. In view (IGAD), resulted in the Machakos Protocol which of the total absence of basic infrastructure, such provided a framework for the cessation of as schools, hospitals and other public service hostilities between the Government of Sudan and facilities, UNHCR must work, more than ever, very the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army closely with all UN/other agencies with expertise (SPLM/A). This initiative created a momentum for in addressing the enormous needs of this complex both parties to engage in a sustainable peace and challenging operation. process. With the recent signing on 26 May 2004 between II.
    [Show full text]