DOCSLIB.ORG

IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021 IRNA Report: [Yirol West County,Lakes State] 4/06/2021 This IRNA Report is a product of Inter-Agency Assessment mission conducted and information compiled based on the inputs provided by partners on the ground including; government authorities, affected communities/IDPs and agencies. Yirol west county is located in lakes state, bordering Rumbek East to the north, Yirol East county to East, Terekeka to west and Awerial county to the south. The inhabitants of this county are Atuot and Apaak with major six subsections. Languages spoken are Thokrel and Dinka. These communities are subsistent farmers and pastoralists. However, majority of these IDPs lost their belongings livestock, food, and nonfood item. It has several Payams as follows; Anuol Payam, Geng-geng Payam, Aluakluak, Abang Payam, Geer, Yirol town payam and Mapuordit Payam. The following mentioned Organizations took part in the assessment done in Yirol West county Jointly initiated by Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (RRC) in Yirol west office. Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), CUAM, HELP, Catholic Relief Service (CRS), PLAN INTERNATIONAL, Solidarity Ministries Africa for Reconciliation and Development (SMARD), Women Aid Vision (WAV), ministry of health, ICAP, AAA, AVSI, AMA, Caritas and TOCH. The assessment was done on 20-05-2021 in two Payams of Yirol west namely Yirol West town and Geng-geng locations. Yirol town has greater number of newly displaced IDPs leading by 1,600 households and Geng- geng with 413 households and Mapuordit with 300 IDPs households. The humanitarian joint assessment was not possible in Mapuordit due to some logistic challenges. According to the RRC report, the total number of IDPs in both Yirol town, Geng-geng and Mapuordit was 2313 households displaced from Anuol Payam of Yirol west county. The various cluster partners took the sampling size of 32 households in Yirol town and 21 in Geng-geng which made it to 53 sample size that was reached with interviews. CAUSES OF THE DISPLACEMENT The communal conflict broke out on 21 April 2021 in Anuol Payam of Yirol west county. It started with youths fighting because of a girl elopement and escalated to the communal looting and random killing of innocent people. The insecurity became a bigger concern, according to the respondents, they didn’t feel safe in their origin Payam anymore therefore they had to flee out to nearby safe places like Mapuordit, Yirol town and Geng-Geng. Some houses were burnt down and properties destroyed, women and girls were beaten and their valuables were removed and ashamed by conflicting youths. The IDPs are hosted in Yirol west town, Geng-Geng and Mapuordit of Yirol west county. Families have been separated due to security issues, the IDPs are sharing most of the essentials item with the host community therefore needed immediate humanitarian assistance more especially food assistance to the large households, shelter assistance now that it is rainy season and house item cooking utensils. The estimated population of the host community in Yirol Town stands at 15,770 and 19,668 in Geng-Geng The displaced people of Anuol lack food since their arrival to Yirol center due to insecurity after conflict started in April 2021. They took refuge in the peaceful neighboring Payam and the conflict had claimed most of their properties including houses of their place of origin burned down others were burned in the houses leaving them vulnerable to hunger. ON arrival the host community assisted some IDPs with food item but as for now they consumed all and situation is deteriorating. They have no farming tools and lands to cultivate in and they are experiencing hardship in their day to day living in their current locations. Children are showing signs and symptoms of anemia due to poor feeding and lack of enough space to shelter They need to be provided with shelter during this rainy season. Mosquito nets and blankets are needed urgently since they sleep in the open compound and under trees uncovered it may lead to high cases of malaria and other diseases. Poor hygiene cases due to lack of soaps lack of sleeping materials and clothes for changing. Majority especially girls and women reported their clothes and valuables were taken forcefully by conflicting youths and others had theirs burned down in their houses. Meanwhile men who escaped fighting never brought anything for sleeping. Malnutrition cases in under 5 children, lactating mothers and pregnant mothers were found in the IDPs during assessment. In this case of reduced feeding a day in children, lactating, pregnant mothers and maybe people of chronic diseases, the situation maybe threating. IDPs still live in fear in their current location since both conflicting parties are present in the location therefore, they fear moving freely. The newly displaced lacked Psycho-social support services and from observation, they look traumatized. These photos of IDPS were taken in Geng-geng Payam during assessment. These three people you see standing in front are RRC enumerator for Anuol and two humanitarian workers participating in the assessment Location map [insert a location map for the assessed site in the box below (I don’t have this map with me currently) Drivers and underlying factors The communal conflict broke out on 21 April 2021 in Anuol Payam of Yirol west county. It started with youths fighting because of a girl elopement and escalated to the communal looting and random killing of innocent people. This has increased vulnerability of elderly people, children and women at large The main drivers will be revenge killing, scrambling over scarce resources and will deteriorate livelihoods of the affected population. There will be no farming, no proper shelters and health facilities The underling factors will evolve around revenge killing, raiding of cows and looting of community belongs if no intervention is made by the local government. The trends of this conflict will likely affect the provision of assistance to those who are still in Anuol but it will not affect the IDPs support because they are staying in Payams that have good security such as Yirol Town, Geng-geng and Mapuordit though Mapuordit sometimes have threat from Rumbek East youths Scope of the crisis and humanitarian profile Anuol Payam is located in Yirol West County, lakes state, bordering Mapuordit to the West, Geng-geng to the East, Terekeka to the South and Abang Payam to the North. The inhabitants of this Payam are Atuot only. Learning and school materials are one the concerns raised by the school going pupils, who were in school before displacement in Anuol payam especially those who are sitting for their final exams to be assisted with school uniform, books and exercise books and school fee to support the children resume their Education effectively because they lost everything during the crisis. The total number of IDPs in Yirol town, Geng-geng and Mapuordit was 2,313 households displaced from Anuol Payam of Yirol west county. The various cluster partners took the sampling size of 32 households in Yirol town and 21 in Geng-geng which made it to 53 sampling size. Yirol town has great number of newly displaced IDPs leading by 1600 households and geng- geng with 413 households where the IDPs are displaced. Other place where IDPs are currently residing is Mapuordit with a population of 300 households. The total population was estimated to stand at 13,878 IDPS and disaggregated as 8,319 females and 5,559 males Current population figures1 County/Payam/Boma Location Host Displaced Source Notes population population 61, 602 47,724 13,878 RRC Status of the population in the affected area IDPs still live in fear in their current locations since both conflicting parties are present in the location therefore, they fear moving freely. They need to be provided with shelter during this rainy season. Mosquito nets and blankets are needed urgently since they sleep in the open compound and under trees uncovered it may lead to high cases of malaria and other diseases. The Newly displaced IDPs lacked housing materials neither do they have sleeping materials. This rainy season, the lactating mothers and their breast-feeding babies plus the elderly IDPs could not cover themselves and find shelter. This led to congestion at a household Children and pregnant mothers spend days under trees and nights in open places, majority do not have sleeping material and even cooking item with them. Therefore, the team recommended that there is need for urgent distribution of non-food item and shelter are highly recommended. Women, children and elderly men and women are greatly affected and are the most vulnerable groups. Malnutrition cases in under 5 children, lactating mothers and pregnant mothers were found in the IDPs during assessment. In this case of reduced feeding a day in children, lactating, pregnant mothers and maybe people of chronic diseases, the situation maybe threatening really. 1 Based on best available figures for initial planning purposes, valid until independent registration is complete Key response priorities [Briefly highlight top priority actions for response. Add clusters as required.] The cluster members recommended urgent response to distribute food assistance to IDPs in their current location, from the general observation of the respondents’ they look hungry and weak as the depended on the host households for food and help of the relatives, friends and their community leaders who can’t sustain them (IDPs) for long with their families. The continual support till they are able to move back to their home of origin home. When the situation normalizes to avoid live risks. Cluster 1 Emergency food distribution to affected IDPs and Host community FSL Cluster Cluster 2 Emergency Nonfood items distribution to IDPs- NFI Cluster Cluster 3 Emergency Nutrition/Health response to IDPs and Host Community- Nutrition/Health Cluster Cluster 4 Emergency Protection and reunion of Women and Vulnerable Children-Protection Cluster.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Peacebuilding- the Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan
    SPECIAL REPORT Strategic Peacebuilding The Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan The Cases of the SPLM Leadership Crisis (2013), the Military Standoff at General Malong’s House (2017), and the Wau Crisis (2016–17) NYATHON H. MAI JULY 2020 WEEKLY REVIEW June 7, 2020 The Boiling Frustrations in South Sudan Abraham A. Awolich outh Sudan’s 2018 peace agreement that ended the deadly 6-year civil war is in jeopardy, both because the parties to it are back to brinkmanship over a number S of mildly contentious issues in the agreement and because the implementation process has skipped over fundamental st eps in a rush to form a unity government. It seems that the parties, the mediators and guarantors of the agreement wereof the mind that a quick formation of the Revitalized Government of National Unity (RTGoNU) would start to build trust between the leaders and to procure a public buy-in. Unfortunately, a unity government that is devoid of capacity and political will is unable to address the fundamentals of peace, namely, security, basic services, and justice and accountability. The result is that the citizens at all levels of society are disappointed in RTGoNU, with many taking the law, order, security, and survival into their own hands due to the ubiquitous absence of government in their everyday lives. The country is now at more risk of becoming undone at its seams than any other time since the liberation war ended in 2005. The current st ate of affairs in the country has been long in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • Return and Reintegration of Sudanese Refugees to Southern Sudan
    Return and Reintegration of Sudanese Refugees to Southern Sudan REVISED SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL January 2004 – December 2005 Home beckons for these Sudanese refugees in Uganda. © UNHCR I. INTRODUCTION period up to 31 December 2004. The estimated funding requirements for planned activities during Decades of armed conflict in southern Sudan January – December 2005 are USD 60 million, have resulted in over 500,000 Sudanese fleeing thereby bringing the total two–year budget to USD into neighbouring countries of Uganda, Ethiopia, 89.9 million. UNHCR will reflect these revised Kenya, the Democratic Republic of the Congo project needs in the 2004 Inter-agency (DRC), Central African Republic (CAR) and Egypt. Consolidated Appeal for the Sudan Assistance The conflict also internally displaced about four Programme (ASAP). million persons. With the funds being requested, it will become In 2002, renewed peace talks launched in possible to strengthen UNHCR’s present capacity Machakos, Kenya, under the auspices of the to support the planned repatriation and Inter-Governmental Authority on Development reintegration activities in southern Sudan. In view (IGAD), resulted in the Machakos Protocol which of the total absence of basic infrastructure, such provided a framework for the cessation of as schools, hospitals and other public service hostilities between the Government of Sudan and facilities, UNHCR must work, more than ever, very the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army closely with all UN/other agencies with expertise (SPLM/A). This initiative created a momentum for in addressing the enormous needs of this complex both parties to engage in a sustainable peace and challenging operation. process. With the recent signing on 26 May 2004 between II.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure Issues in Southern Sudan: Key Findings and Recommendations for Southern Sudan Land Policy
    LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY DECEMBER 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD. LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY THE RESULTS OF A RESEARCH COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE SUDAN PROPERTY RIGHTS PROGRAM AND THE NILE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DECEMBER 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgements Page i Scoping Paper Section A Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla Jurisdiction of GOSS, State, County, and Customary Authorities over Land Section B Administration, Planning, and Allocation: Juba County, Central Equatoria State Lomoro Robert Bullen Land Tenure and Property Rights in Southern Sudan: A Case Study of Section C Informal Settlements in Juba Gabriella McMichael Customary Authority and Traditional Authority in Southern Sudan: A Case Study Section D of Juba County Wani Mathias Jumi Conflict Over Resources Among Rural Communities in Southern Sudan Section E Andrew Athiba Synthesis Paper Section F Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The USAID Sudan Property Rights Program has supported the Southern Sudan Land Commission in its efforts to undertake consultation and research on land tenure and property rights issues; the findings of these initiatives were used to draft a land policy that is meant to be both legitimate and relevant to the needs of Southern Sudanese citizens and legal rights-holders.
    [Show full text]
  • C the Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan
    C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following persons (from State Ministries of Livestock and Fishery Industries and FAO South Sudan Office) for collecting field data from the sample counties in nine of the ten States of South Sudan: Angelo Kom Agoth; Makuak Chol; Andrea Adup Algoc; Isaac Malak Mading; Tongu James Mark; Sebit Taroyalla Moris; Isaac Odiho; James Chatt Moa; Samuel Ajiing Uguak; Samuel Dook; Rogina Acwil; Raja Awad; Simon Mayar; Deu Lueth Ader; Mayok Dau Wal and John Memur. The authors also extend their special thanks to Erminio Sacco, Chief Technical Advisor and Dr Abdal Monium Osman, Senior Programme Officer, at FAO South Sudan for initiating this study and providing the necessary support during the preparatory and field deployment phases. DISCLAIMER FAO South Sudan mobilized a team of independent consultants to conduct this study. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. COMPOSITION OF STUDY TEAM Yacob Aklilu Gebreyes (Team Leader) Gezu Bekele Lemma Luka Biong Deng Shaif Abdullahi i C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...I ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... VI NOTES ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp By
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT PEACE IS THE NAME OF OUR CATTLE-CAMP LOCAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT IN EASTERN LAKES STATE, SOUTH SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT Peace is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp Local responses to conflict in Eastern Lakes State, South Sudan JOHN RYLE AND MACHOT AMUOM Authors John Ryle (co-author), Legrand Ramsey Professor of Anthropology at Bard College, New York, was born and educated in the United Kingdom. He is lead researcher on the RVI South Sudan Customary Authorities Project. Machot Amuom Malou (co-author) grew up in Yirol during Sudan’s second civil war. He is a graduate of St. Lawrence University, Uganda, and a member of The Greater Yirol Youth Union that organised the 2010 Yirol Peace Conference. Abraham Mou Magok (research consultant) is a graduate of the Nile Institute of Management Studies in Uganda. Born in Aluakluak, he has worked in local government and the NGO sector in Greater Yirol. Aya piŋ ëë kͻcc ἅ luël toc ku wεl Ɣͻk Ɣͻk kuek jieŋ ku Atuot akec kaŋ thör wal yic Yeŋu ye köc röt nͻk wεt toc ku wal Mith thii nhiar tͻͻŋ ku ran wut pεεc Yin aci pεεc tik riεl Acin ke cam riεlic Kͻcdit nyiar tͻͻŋ Ku cͻk ran nͻk aci yͻk thin Acin ke cam riεlic Wut jiëŋ ci riͻc Wut Atuot ci riͻc Yok Ɣen Apaak ci riͻc Yen ya wutdie Acin kee cam riεlic ëëë I hear people are fighting over grazing land. Cattle don’t fight—neither Jieŋ cattle nor Atuot cattle. Why do we fight in the name of grass? Young men who raid cattle-camps— You won’t get a wife that way.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF South Sudan Humanitarian Situation Sept 2019
    UNICEF SOUTH SUDAN SITUATION REPORT SEPTEMBER 2019 13 year-old Claudio Justin has drawn some of the tools he will need as an engineer. He used to watch his brother in his workshop. His brother has passed away, and Claudio wants South to pick up his legacy. Photo: UNICEF/Gonzalez Farran Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report SEPTEMBER 2019: SOUTH SUDAN SITREP #136 SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights • On 17 September, 21 children associated with armed forces and armed 1.47 million Internally displaced persons (IDPs) groups (CAAFAG), all boys, were released in Aweil East. (OCHA South Sudan Humanitarian Snapshot, • UNICEF supported the government in organising International Day of September 2019) Girl Child under the theme "educate a girl to change a nation" in Malakal, Rumbek and Yambio in the last week of September to create demand for girls’ education in the country. 2.24 million South Sudanese refugees in • On 26 September, A Facilitator’s Manual for Psychosocial Support (PSS) neighbouring countries in Child Friendly Spaces, Schools and Communities and trainers guides and (UNHCR Regional Portal, South Sudan Situation a Practical Guide for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Girls Formerly 30 September 2019) Associated with Armed Forces and Groups were officially launched by UNICEF. 6.35 million South Sudanese facing acute food UNICEF’s Response with Partners in 2019 insecurity or worse (August 2019 Projection, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) Cluster for 2019 UNICEF and partners for 2019 Indicators Target Cumulative Cumulative
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Rift Valley Fever - Yirol County and the Interventions
    Update on Rift Valley Fever - Yirol county and the interventions Name: Wilson Makuwaza Date: 2 Feb 2021 Outline - Introduction - Lab results - Risk assessment - The response - Discussion Introduction - Several meetings held to discuss RVF since May 2020 - Joint missions conducted 29 Oct – 5 Nov 2020 and on 17 – 23 Dec 2020 - Participants: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries, FAO, Ministry of Health, WHO, Min of Wildlife (1st mission) Lab results – Central Vet lab - Several meeting held to discuss RVF since May 2020 - 53 samples were collected 5 tested positive for RVF IgM, 6 samples were doubtful (considered positive) and 42 tested negative. - The results of 160 animal sample tests from the second mission (17 – 24 Dec 2020) are shown below: Lab results – Central Vet lab Lab test results – 1st mission doubtful Positive 11% 10% Negative 79% Positive Negative doubtful Lab results – 2nd mission Species RVF- IgM RVF – IgG 1 Cattle (N= 70) 2 (3 %) 27 (39%) 2 Goat (N= 81) 1 (1%) 8 (10%) 3 Sheep (N= 9) 0 (0 %) 1 (11%) Total 160 3 36 Lab results Summary (2nd mission): • Out of 70 cattle samples, 2 (3%) tested positive for RVF IgM and 27 (39%) tested positive for RVF IgG. One goat sample tested positive for RVF- IgM and 8 tested positive IgG, none of the sheep samples tested positive IgM whilst one sample tested positive for IgG. Human samples • 5 human samples were collected – feedback from WHO (30 Jan 2021) is that they are yet to receive the results. • Sensitivity low for RVF human surveillance; focus on livestock surveillance to detect abortion storms and mitigation actions Risk assessment Risk factors - High risk that RVF is in circulation in Yirol county with possible spill over to neighbouring counties / states - This could be linked to cattle raiding, flood related displacement, livestock trade, seasonal movement in search of pastures and water for livestock, and movement due to insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ethnic Groups in Southern Sudan Exact Representationw Ohf Iteh En Isleituation Ins Tehnen Acrountry
    Ethnic boundaries shown on this map are not an Distribution of Ethnic Groups in Southern Sudan exact representationW ohf iteh eN isleituation inS tehnen aCrountry. The administrative units and their names shown on this map do not imply White acceptance or recognition by the Government of Southern Sudan. Blue ") State Capitals This map aims only to support the work of the Humanitarian Community. Nile Renk Nile Sudan Renk Admin. Units County Level Southern Darfur Southern Shilluk Berta Admin. Units State Level Kordofan Manyo Berta Country Boundary Manyo Melut International Boundaries Shilluk Maban Sudan Fashoda Dinka (Abiliang) Abyei Pariang Upper Nile Burum Malakal Data Sources: National and State Dinka (Ruweng) ") boundaries based on Russian Sudan Malakal Baliet Abiemnhom Panyikang Map Series, 1:200k, 1970-ties. Rubkona Guit County Boundaries digitized based on Aweil North Statistical Yearbook 2009 Aweil East Twic Mayom ") Nuer (Jikany) Canal (Khor Fulus) Longochuk Southern Sudan Commission for Census, Dinka (Twic WS) Nuer (Bul) Statistics and Evaluation - SSCCSE. Fangak Dinka (Padeng) Digitized by IMU OCHA Southern Sudan Aweil West Dinka (Malual) Nuer (Lek) Gogrial East Unity Nuer (Jikany) Northern Bahr el Ghazal ") Luakpiny/Nasir Aweil Maiwut Aweil South Raga Koch Gogrial West Nuer (Jegai) Nyirol Ulang Nuer (Gawaar) Aweil Centre Warrap ") Tonj North Ayod Kwajok Mayendit Leer Dinka (Rek) Fertit Chad Nuer (Adok) Nuer (Lou) Jur Chol Tonj East ") Wau Akobo Western Bahr el Ghazal Nuer (Nyong) Dinka (Hol) Uror Duk Jur River Rumbek North Panyijar
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Compounding Instability in Unity State
    SOUTH SUDAN: COMPOUNDING INSTABILITY IN UNITY STATE Africa Report N°179 – 17 October 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. STATE ORIGINS AND CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................ 1 III. LEGACY OF WAR ........................................................................................................... 3 IV. POLITICAL POLARISATION AND A CRISIS OF GOVERNANCE ...................... 4 A. COMPLAINTS LODGED ................................................................................................................. 5 B. PARTY POLITICS: A HOUSE DIVIDED ........................................................................................... 6 C. TENSE GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION ............................................................................................. 7 D. THE DIVIDE REMAINS .................................................................................................................. 8 V. NATIONAL POLITICS AT PLAY ................................................................................. 8 VI. REBEL MILITIA GROUPS AND THE POLITICS OF REBELLION .................... 10 A. MILITIA COMMANDERS AND FLAWED INTEGRATION ................................................................. 11 B. THE STAKES ARE RAISED: PETER GADET ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Village Assessment Survey Yirol West County
    Village Assessment Survey COUNTY ATLAS 2013 Yirol West County Lakes State Village Assessment Survey The Village Assessment Survey (VAS) has been used by IOM since 2007 and is a comprehensive data source for South Sudan that provides detailed information on access to basic services, infra- structure and other key indicators essential to informing the development of efficient reintegra- tion programmes. The most recent VAS represents IOM’s largest effort to date encompassing 30 priority counties comprising of 871 bomas, 197 payams, 468 health facilities, and 1,277 primary schools. There was a particular emphasis on assessing payams outside state capitals, where com- paratively fewer comprehensive assessments have been carried out. IOM conducted the assess- ment in priority counties where an estimated 72% of the returnee population (based on esti- mates as of 2012) has resettled. The county atlas provides spatial data at the boma level and should be used in conjunction with the VAS county profile. Four (4) Counties Assessed Planning Map and Dashboard..…………Page 1 WASH Section…………..………...Page 14 - 20 General Section…………...……...Page 2 - 5 Natural Source of Water……...……….…..Page 14 Main Ethnicities and Languages.………...Page 2 Water Point and Physical Accessibility….…Page 15 Infrastructure and Services……...............Page 3 Water Management & Conflict....….………Page 16 Land Ownership and Settlement Type ….Page 4 WASH Education...….……………….…….Page 17 Returnee Land Allocation Status..……...Page 5 Latrine Type and Use...………....………….Page 18 Livelihood
    [Show full text]
  • Council Implementing Regulation (Eu
    L 182/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 10.7.2015 REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1112 of 9 July 2015 implementing Articles 20(1) and 22(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 of 7 May 2015 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 748/2014 (1), and in particular Articles 20(1) and 22(1) thereof, Whereas: (1) On 7 May 2015, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2015/735. (2) On 1 July 2015, the Sanctions Committee established pursuant to paragraph 16 of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2206 (2015) included six persons on the list of persons and entities subject to the measures imposed by paragraph 12 of that Resolution. (3) The names of the two persons listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2015/735 should be removed from that Annex because of their designation by the UN Security Council Committee and should therefore be added to Annex I to that Regulation. (4) Annexes I and II to Regulation (EU) 2015/735 should be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/735 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation. Article 2 The following names are removed from Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2015/735, as are the related entries: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 October to 31 December 2015
    List of locations where payment of danger pay has been approved with effect from 1 October to 31 December 2015 • Afghanistan • Cameroon – the Far North Region with the duty station of Maroua • Central African Republic • Democratic Republic of the Congo Katanga Province - only Tanganyka and Haut-Katanga districts, including the following duty stations and locations - Bendera, Kabalo, Kalemie, Kongolo, Manono, Moba, Mitwaba and Pweto North Kivu Province - including the following duty stations and locations - Beni, Butembo, Goma, Kanyabayonga, Kitchanga, Kiwanja, Lubero, Masisi, Ngungu, Rutshuru and Walikale Orientale province - only Bas Uele, Haut Uele and Ituri districts, including the following duty stations and locations – Aba, Ango, Aru, Aveba, Bangadi, Bili, Bunia, Buta, Dungu, Duru, Faradje, Isiro, Komanda and Mahagi South Kivu province - including the following duty stations and locations - Baraka, Bukavu, Fizi, Kalehe, Kamanyola, Kilembwe, Lulimba, Minembwe, Minova, Mwenga, Sange, Shabunda, Uvira and Walungu • Ethiopia - Somali Region, except Jijiga, Shinile and Adfer Zones of the Somali Region • Guinea - Applicable to staff who are required to report to work in the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) operations (see footnote for details)* • Iraq -the entire country, excluding the cities of Basrah, Dohuk and Najaf, and the Kurdistan Region of Iraq comprising Erbil and Sulaymaniyah Provinces, except their respective border areas, 20 km inside Kurdistan Region of Iraq, with Iran and Turkey • Kenya - North Eastern Province including the
    [Show full text]