The Politeness Ethic and the Development of the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Politeness Ethic and the Development of the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century England The Politeness Ethic and the Development of the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century England Rosalind Lee Beng Tan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social Sciences University of New South Wales March 2015 Originality Statement ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in this thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project’s design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ _________________________________________________________________________++ Signed by Rosalind L B Tan i Acknowledgements This thesis embodies the humanistic scholarship and the exemplary mentorship of my principal supervisor, Professor Andrew Metcalfe. It is built on his ascetic practice, nurtured through his emphasis on rationality, and sustained till the end by the inspiration of his politeness. It has been an exhilarating and soul-nourishing experience and this thesis will not be possible without the guidance and devotion of Professor Metcalfe. I wish to extend my heartfelt appreciation to the School of Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales. In particular, I would like to thank Associate Professor Paul Jones for his guidance, and my joint supervisor, Dr Claudia Tazreiter, for her faith in me and for her encouragement throughout my candidature. I have also benefited much from the interest and support of the panel members of the Annual Progress Reviews. I wish to thank Professor Ann Game, Professor Elizabeth Fernandez, Associate Professor Helen Meekosha, Associate Professor Leanne Dowse, Associate Professor Rogelia Pe-Pua, and Dr Mary Zournazi. I have also thoroughly enjoyed the thesis-writing courses conducted by Associate Professor Sue Starfield and Dr Michael Wearing. I am grateful for the kindness and friendship extended to me by Associate Professor Alan Morris, now researching at the Centre for Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney, as well as Professor Ursula Rao, now directing the Institute of Anthropology at the University of Leipzig. I extend my grateful thanks to my special friend, Dr Monica Laura Vaquez Maggio for her friendship. I would also like to acknowledge the support, kindness and assistance of Ms Anita Sibrits for ensuring that I got the supervisor’s feedback when I was writing in the bush. At UNSW, my candidature was supported by the efficiency and kindness of the staff at the Inter-Library Loan section of the Library, the Technical Support Service, the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, as well as the School of Graduate Research. During my literature research in England on Wedgwood and the production and consumption of porcelain and earthenware, I was privileged to have received the generous help of Kevin Salt at the Wedgwood Museum, as well as the kind assistance of the librarians at the National Art Library, Victoria and Albert Museum and the British Library. ii My thesis writing would not have been possible without the constant encouragement and enduring faith of my special friends and loving family. They were instrumental in sustaining the flickering candle light when it was almost extinguished during a thunderstorm. I would like to thank most heartily Andrew and Tracey for standing by me and holding my hands when the going got tough. Gerry and Neil gave me courage to persevere when I stumbled. David and Juliet checked on my progress and listened to my trials with sympathy. Toby and Helen supported with their interest in my thesis argument. Ian and Janie sustained me as I struggled to find my voice. Pauline and Darryl nourished me with their positivity. Lucinda and Martin supported me in my endeavour. Alison and Richard energised me with their intellectual curiosity. Bill and Liz spurred me on through engaging discussions. Kyril and Terry did not doubt my ability to complete the thesis. Dianne and Geoff gave me reason to be tenacious. I acknowledge their embrace as I inch my way up, slowly but surely. I have a large contingent of the most faithful and devoted cheerleaders from Canada, Singapore and England who hauled me out of the crevasses with their moral strength and emotional support. First and foremost, I cannot thank my sister, Hazel, enough for seeing me through and insisting that I must look for a dedicated supervisor, who has the best interests of the students at heart, and who extends himself beyond the call of duty. She could not have been more ‘spot-on’ with that counsel. I want to thank Hazel for assuming the role of an examiner in guiding me through writing my introduction and conclusion, the two most difficult chapters of the whole thesis. In the last year, the constant nourishment provided by my special friends and family members, Francisca in Perth and Swee Peng in Singapore, has been indispensable in energising me to keep the faith and finish the race. I thank Meng Eng for her implicit faith and interest in my progress. Dorothy, Lee Lee and Linda have all pushed me closer to the finish line with their encouraging words. I thank Mrs Loong for feeding the chickens, Sugar and Nice, and attending to my veggie patch whilst I studied. I thank James and Angela for helping me sort out my computer problem. I wish to extend my deepest gratitude to Pearlyn for giving me the much needed support before, during and after the Singapore Book Fairs, so that I could focus on my thesis writing. I want to thank Thian Poh, Min Hao and Min Jie for their thoughtfulness and practical help when I had to struggle with thesis writing and selling books. The timely visits of my god-children Gabriel, Lionel, Isabelle, Crystalle, Candice and Annabel during my thesis writing gave me the much needed opportunity to relax iii and recharge. I want to thank them all for waving their flags and dancing along with their pom-poms right till the end. The rousing support from Vic and Michael in England came loud and clear. I thank them for their constant encouragement and interest in my progress. Their love and friendship, as well as interest in my thesis, encouraged me to strive on. In particular, I want to acknowledge their hospitality and generosity during my two-week research stint in England. I thank Nigel and Gilly, Alistair and Mrs Doreen Drake for believing in me and cheering me on. The thesis writing is a collaborative effort. It is a joint mobilization exercise from the very beginning. There is no way I could have done it alone. Nicholas Drake has been my examiner, supervisor, co-researcher, and collaborator throughout this journey. He is also the gardener, the cook, the washer-upper, the handyman, the courier pigeon and the best helpmate. Not only did he have to endure late nights listening to my various hypotheses, but he also had to keep my body and soul together. I have been nourished on the sweetest and freshest sweet corn, peas, broccoli, cabbages, zucchinis, cucumbers, chillies, tomatoes, potatoes, spinach, lettuce, artichoke, radishes, capsicums, ladies fingers, garlic, brinjals and celery. As the head gardener, he delighted me with the most beautiful lavender, roses, irises, gladioli, camellia, sweet peas and dahlia. It is his pursuit of perfection and interest in classical symmetry and proportion, in life and aesthetics, which inspired me to study eighteenth-century England. Nicholas’s ascetic approach to cultivating the land and ensuring that the best yields are coaxed from the veggie garden, as well as his pursuit of perfection, convinced me that politeness is not an ethical and aesthetic orientation appropriated only by the Georgian English. iv Thesis Abstract The transition of the age of enlightenment has been interrogated in several ways. Weber traces the relationship between asceticism and the rise of capitalism in the seventeenth century. Elias discusses the cultivation of civilitè, founded on rationalization, social constraints and self-restraint, in interrogating the making of the French courtiers and the bourgeois society. In analysing the development of the public sphere, Habermas identifies the importance of conversation, predicated on rationality and sociability. Foucault stresses the disciplining of the self to prepare the individuals to participate in the public sphere. To contribute to the above dialogue, this thesis interrogates the idiom of politeness as a constituent of the ethical and aesthetic landscape of eighteenth-century England. It analyses the themes of asceticism, rationality and sociability implicit in the three key components of politeness: self-cultivation, social interaction and cultural construction. To trace the rise and pursuit of politeness, this thesis refers to the works, letters and personal notes of the third Earl of Shaftesbury, the writings of Joseph Addison and Richard Steele as encapsulated in the Spectator, personal correspondence of Josiah Wedgwood, one of England foremost capitalists, as well as secondary historical literature. In The Protestant Ethic, Weber establishes the congruence between Calvinism and the spirit of capitalism. This thesis interrogates the life of Josiah Wedgwood, a non- Calvinist, to illustrate that capitalism in the post-puritan era did not function on a mechanistic foundation as suggested by Weber. Rather, it proposes that the ethic of politeness, rooted in asceticism and predicated on rationality and sociability, exerted its influence on the new class of gentlemen, represented by Wedgwood in his role as a capitalist, cultural producer and citizen-patriot.
Recommended publications
  • "This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641 Nathaniel A
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2018 "This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641 Nathaniel A. Earle Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Earle, Nathaniel A., ""This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641" (2018). All Theses. 2950. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2950 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "THIS COURT DOTH KEEP ALL ENGLAND IN QUIET" STAR CHAMBER AND PUBLIC EXPRESSION IN PREREVOLUTIONARY ENGLAND 1625–1641 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Nathaniel A. Earle August 2018 Accepted by: Dr. Caroline Dunn, Committee Chair Dr. Alan Grubb Dr. Lee Morrissey ABSTRACT The abrupt legislative destruction of the Court of Star Chamber in the summer of 1641 is generally understood as a reaction against the perceived abuses of prerogative government during the decade of Charles I’s personal rule. The conception of the court as an ‘extra-legal’ tribunal (or as a legitimate court that had exceeded its jurisdictional mandate) emerges from the constitutional debate about the limits of executive authority that played out over in Parliament, in the press, in the pulpit, in the courts, and on the battlefields of seventeenth-century England.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01316-2 - The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 Edited by Catherine Ingrassia Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to women’s writing in britain, 1660–1789 Women writers played a central role in the literature and culture of eighteenth- century Britain. Featuring essays on female writers and genres by leading scho- lars in the field, this Companion introduces readers to the range, significance, and complexity of women’s writing across multiple genres in Britain between 1660 and 1789. Divided into two parts, the Companion first discusses women’s participation in print culture, featuring essays on topics such as women and popular culture, women as professional writers, women as readers and writers, and place and publication. Additionally, Part I explores the ways that women writers crossed generic boundaries. The second part contains chapters on many of the key genres in which women wrote, including poetry, drama, fiction (early and later), history, the ballad, periodicals, and travel writing. The Companion also provides an introduction surveying the state of the field, an integrated chronology, and a guide to further reading. catherine ingrassia is Professor of English at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia. She is the author of Authorship, Commerce, and Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: A Culture of Paper Credit (Cambridge, 1998); editor of a critical edition of Eliza Haywood’s Anti- Pamela and Henry Fielding’s Shamela (2004); and co-editor of A Companion to the Eighteenth-Century Novel and Culture (2005) and the anthology British Women Poets of the Long Eighteenth Century (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament, Politics and People Seminar Paper-Revised
    Dr Eilish Gregory Catholic Forfeitures during the English Revolution: Parliament and the Role of Sequestration Agents In early November 1656, the Catholic William Blundell wrote to his nephew Thomas Selby updating him about the latest news in his home county of Lancashire and on matters of his estate. Blundell had previously told Selby about his dealings with agent Gilbert Crouch who was managing his sequestration and compounding affairs which were taking place in London. He remarked that Crouch had promised him ‘that he wil [sic] look carefully to my Exchequer busines’ and Blundell hoped that Selby would inform himself how best he could befriend Crouch, as he was apprehensive about the current dangers that was occurring at that time. Gilbert Crouch had purchased the sequestered estates of William Blundell; he held Blundell’s estates’ of Little Crosby and Ditton in trust until the Restoration. During the civil wars, Blundell had actively supported King Charles I and the Royalist cause, answering the call to serve the king in the Commission of Array in 1642, becoming a captain in the local dragoons before his capture and imprisonment. Consequently, his estates in Little Crosby in Lancashire were sequestered for delinquency and he spent much of the war petitioning to compound for his estates. Unlike the thousands that were sequestered for delinquency during the conflict, Blundell was well-versed in the art of sequestration and compounding for his estates. As a Catholic, he had frequently compounded for his estates for recusancy, and regularly paid his fines during Charles I’s Personal Rule in the 1630s.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulers of Opinion Women at the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 1799
    Rulers of Opinion Women at the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 1799-1812 Harriet Olivia Lloyd UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of Science 2018 1 I, Harriet Olivia Lloyd, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the role of women at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in its first decade and contributes to the field by writing more women into the history of science. Using the method of prosopography, 844 women have been identified as subscribers to the Royal Institution from its founding on 7 March 1799, until 10 April 1812, the date of the last lecture given by the chemist Humphry Davy (1778- 1829). Evidence suggests that around half of Davy’s audience at the Royal Institution were women from the upper and middle classes. This female audience was gathered by the Royal Institution’s distinguished patronesses, who included Mary Mee, Viscountess Palmerston (1752-1805) and the chemist Elizabeth Anne, Lady Hippisley (1762/3-1843). A further original contribution of this thesis is to explain why women subscribed to the Royal Institution from the audience perspective. First, Linda Colley’s concept of the “service élite” is used to explain why an institution that aimed to apply science to the “common purposes of life” appealed to fashionable women like the distinguished patronesses. These women were “rulers of opinion,” women who could influence their peers and transform the image of a degenerate ruling class to that of an élite that served the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bluestocking Salons of Eighteenth-Century Britain
    The Daily Star, Dhaka, Saturday 29 September 2018 https://www.thedailystar.net/literature/news/the-bluestocking-salons-eighteenth-century-britain- 1640020 12:00 AM, September 29, 2018 / LAST MODIFIED: 12:00 AM, September 29, 2018 The Bluestocking Salons of Eighteenth-Century Britain Md. Mahmudul Hasan I enjoyed reading my teacher and mentor Fakrul Alam's “The Literary Club of 18th-Century London” (Daily Star, 20 August 2018). Referring to our age-old practice of having literary addas (chatting circles) and London's “The Club” better known as “Literary Club” which Samuel Johnson (1709-84) and Joshua Reynolds (1723-92) founded in 1764, he pointed to a comparable literary tradition of Bengal and Britain. It is believed that Johnson was inspired by Francis Bacon's precept that “reading makes a full man, conversation a ready man, and writing an exact man” and used to devote “most attention to how to communicate useful and pleasurable knowledge successfully.” So mainly because of Johnson's witticisms, sense of humour and the entertaining conversations of the Club, it received wide coverage in the national and international media of the time. Johnson's and Reynolds' Club attracted other great writers such as Adam Smith (1723-90), Oliver Goldsmith (1728-74), Edward Gibbon (1737-94) and James Boswell (1740-95). However, the fact remains that it was an all-male circle of interlocutors. The title of Professor Alam's essay stirred in me an anticipation that it would touch on the eighteenth-century bluestocking circles which were perhaps equally vibrant. It did not do so, to which I drew his attention.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of English Literature MICHAEL ALEXANDER
    A History of English Literature MICHAEL ALEXANDER [p. iv] © Michael Alexander 2000 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W 1 P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2000 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 0-333-91397-3 hardcover ISBN 0-333-67226-7 paperback A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 O1 00 Typeset by Footnote Graphics, Warminster, Wilts Printed in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wilts [p. v] Contents Acknowledgements The harvest of literacy Preface Further reading Abbreviations 2 Middle English Literature: 1066-1500 Introduction The new writing Literary history Handwriting
    [Show full text]
  • Portela, Manuel (2004), 'A Portrait of the Author As an Author'
    Pre-print version To cite this Article: Portela, Manuel (2004), ‘A Portrait of the Author as an Author’, Novas Histórias Literárias/New Literary Histories, Coimbra: CoimbraMinerva, pp. 357-371. Manuel Portela A PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR AS AN AUTHOR Abstract The growth of the literary market in the eighteenth century changed concepts of authorship. Portrait conventions were also used to frame authorial personality. By looking at pictorial representations of men and women authors, in paintings and prints, I identify conflicting images of authorship. Idealised representations of the author as gentleman or lady are contrasted with images of the violence of market forces. Polite restraint of the self-conscious individual genius has to face the unruly passions and interests that characterise the new social relations of literary production.1 Resumo O crescimento do mercado literário no século XVIII alterou a concepção da autoria. As convenções do retrato foram também usadas para definir a personalidade autoral. Através da observação de representações de autores e autoras, em pinturas e gravuras, identifico imagens contraditórias da autoria. Representações idealizadas do autor enquanto cavalheiro ou enquanto senhora são contrastadas com imagens da violência das forças do mercado. O autodomínio polido do génio individual tem de enfrentar as paixões e interesses desregrados que caracterizam as novas relações sociais de produção. Keywords: portrait painting; literary authorship; Jonathan Richardson; William Hogarth; Grub-street. 1 Most URLs in this article link to the online catalogue of the National Portrait Gallery, London. They have been updated in December 2011, when this file was added to the online repository of the University of Coimbra.
    [Show full text]
  • American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS)
    American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS) Mr. Spectator and the Coffeehouse Public Sphere Author(s): Brian Cowan Source: Eighteenth-Century Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, Critical Networks (Spring, 2004), pp. 345-366 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press . Sponsor: American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS) . Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25098064 Accessed: 01-05-2015 01:13 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press and American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Eighteenth-Century Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 194.27.18.18 on Fri, 01 May 2015 01:13:12 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ,JL . Spectator and the Coffeehouse Public Sphere Brian Cowan Recent critical and historical studies of post-Restoration England have been fascinated with the thought that the period saw the emergence of something called a "public sphere" and that the coffeehouse was a central locus for it. J?r gen Habermas
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 12 'THINKING MINDS of BOTH SEXES': Patriotism, British Bluestockings and the Wars Against Revolutionary America An
    1 Chapter 12 ‘THINKING MINDS OF BOTH SEXES’: Patriotism, British Bluestockings and the Wars against Revolutionary America and France, 1775-1802 Emma V. Macleod ‘Without intending it, I have slid into politics’, wrote the poet Anna Seward at the end of a long letter to a regular correspondent, Colonel Dowdeswell of Shrewsbury, in November 1797. ‘In a period so momentous,’ she explained, ‘their attraction, to thinking minds of both sexes, is resistless.’1 This quotation might suggest that Seward had forgotten herself temporarily to make a brief aside which touched on some political question. In fact, her whole letter had been devoted to discussing the war against revolutionary France—her enjoyment of a concert in Birmingham given to celebrate Admiral Duncan’s victory at Camperdown the previous month; the civility of the eighty French prisoners of war exiled in her home town of Lichfield in Staffordshire for the past ten months; the prisoners’ inhospitable reception by most of the other residents of Lichfield and their recent removal to Liverpool jail; her musing on the sufferings of British prisoners of war in France; the miseries and evils of war in general; and the prejudice and corruption of the Pitt administration in its refusal to seek peace with France sooner. The ‘slide’ into 2 politics that she mentions therefore represents no momentary lapse, but rather a natural shift from describing her experience, as a genteel woman, of the British homefront during the war against revolutionary France—through appropriately feminine expressions of anxiety about British prisoners and the horrors of war—to clearly political judgement regarding the errors of government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Papers / Résumés Des Communications S – Z
    Abstracts of Papers / Résumés des communications S – Z Abstracts are listed in alphabetical order of Les résumés sont classés par ordre presenter. Names, paper titles, and alphabétique selon le nom du conférencier. institutional information have been checked Les noms, titres et institutions de and, where necessary, corrected. The main rattachement ont été vérifiés et, le cas text, however, is in the form in which it was échéant, corrigés. Le corps du texte reste originally submitted to us by the presenter dans la forme soumise par le/la participant.e and has not been corrected or formatted. et n'a pas été corrigé ou formaté. Les Abstracts are provided as a guide to the résumés sont fournis pour donner une content of papers only. The organisers of the indication du contenu. Les organisateurs du congress are not responsible for any errors or Congrès ne sont pas responsables des erreurs omissions, nor for any changes which ou omissions, ni des changements que les presenters make to their papers. présentateurs pourraient avoir opéré. Wout Saelens (University of Antwerp) Enlightened Comfort: The Material Culture of Heating and Lighting in Eighteenth-Century Ghent Panel / Session 454, ‘Enlightenment Spaces’. Friday /Vendredi 14.00 – 15.45. 2.07, Appleton Tower. Chair / Président.e : Elisabeth Fritz (Friedrich Schiller University, Jena) As enlightened inventors like Benjamin Franklin and Count Rumford were thinking about how to improve domestic comfort through more efficient stove and lamp types, the increasing importance of warmth and light in material culture is considered to have been one of the key features of the eighteenth-century ‘invention of comfort’.
    [Show full text]
  • Treason and the State: Law, Politics, and Ideology in the English Civil War D
    This page intentionally left blank Treason and the State This study traces the transition of treason from a personal crime against the monarch to a modern crime against the impersonal state. It consists of four highly detailed case studies of major state treason trials in England beginning with that of Thomas Wentworth, First Earl of Strafford, in the spring of 1641 and ending with that of Charles Stuart, King of England, in January 1649. The book examines how these trials constituted practical contexts in which ideas of statehood and public authority legitimated courses of political action that might ordi- narily be considered unlawful – or at least not within the compass of the foundational statute of 25 Edward III. The ensuing narrative reveals how the events of the 1640s in England challenged existing conceptions of treason as a personal crime against the king, his family and his servants, and pushed the ascendant parliamentarian faction toward embracing an impersonal conception of the state that perceived public authority as completely independent of any individual or group. d. alan orr was educated at Queen’s University at Kingston, the University of Glasgow and the University of Cambridge, where he received his Ph.D. in 1997. He has taught subsequently at Carleton University in Ottawa and Queen’s University at Kingston. Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History Series editors anthony fletcher Victoria County History, Institute of Historical Research, University of London john guy Professor of Modern History, University of St. Andrews and john morrill Professor of British and Irish History, University of Cambridge, and Vice-Master of Selwyn College This is a series of monographs and studies covering many aspects of the history of the British Isles between the late fifteenth century and the early eighteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiom the Joumals of Frances Burney ( 1752- 1 840)
    1 Febnrrary - 12 March 1789: An Annotated Seteciion fiom the Joumals of Frances Burney ( 1752- 1 840) Lisa Am Saroli Department of English McGill University, Montreal Febniary 2000 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in *al filfiilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts 0 Lisa Ann Saroti 200 Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibîiiraphic Services services bibliographiques The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une Lcence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libmy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationaie du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seli reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substaatial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Table of Contents Abstract.. ............................................................................................... i .. Abrégé.. ............................................................................................... 11 ... Acknowledgements................................................................................
    [Show full text]