Ethnic Identity, Culture, and Race: Japanese and Nikkei at Home and Abroad 民族、文化、人種−−本土及び海外の日本人と日 系日本人
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Volume 8 | Issue 37 | Number 4 | Article ID 3410 | Sep 13, 2010 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Ethnic Identity, Culture, and Race: Japanese and Nikkei at Home and Abroad 民族、文化、人種−−本土及び海外の日本人と日 系日本人 Nobuko Adachi Ethnic Identity, Culture, and Race: Japanese-Latin Americans en route to US Japanese and Nikkei at Home and internment camps in World War II Abroad1 Issues of individual and community struggles Nobuko Adachi for cultural and economic survival have yet to be examined in a global context. Little, too, has Today, three million people of Japanese descent been written on Japanese nationals living are citizens of almost every nation in the world. abroad, an important group whose numbers In contrast to other transplanted peoples—like have been increasing rapidly in recent decades. African, Irish, Chinese, Jewish, or Mexican These people are inexorably involved in the migrants —the individual stories of Japanese social, cultural, economic, and political transnational migrants and Nikkei (people of environments of both their resident and Japanese descent who were born and grew up ancestral-home societies. All migrants, of abroad) have received little scholarly attention. course, find distinct differences between their Discussions of Japanese transnational migrants original societies and those in which they and Nikkei have focused on social and political currently reside. And while they live in new issues, such as racial discrimination or the nations, many retain connections to their old home. internment camps of the United States and Canada during World War II, “returnee” Images of “home” however often are Nikkei, and dekasegi (temporary migrant reconstructed in the minds of transnational workers) in Japan. migrants in special ways because they lack direct daily interactions with people from the ancestral country. Images of home often become exaggerated. For example, migrants from the same country tend to associate with each other in their new societies where they confront daily struggles. By coming together in activities and organized events, the group reforms images of the homeland and, through these images, individuals construct and reform their sense of “self” and “other.” The host nation’s public view of the migrants’ home country also shapes their self image. People of the host nation call the immigrants’ culture “ethnic,” as seen in everyday discourse 1 8 | 37 | 4 APJ | JF when referring to things like “ethnic food,” “Honorary Whites” or “Honorary Europeans” “ethnic music,” or “ethnic heritage.” This during the apartheid period in the 1960s mainstream characterization is used without (Kawasaki 2001: 54). Since the 1980s, thought or malice, even though the migrants Japanese, as well as some other Asians, were themselves might be uncomfortable, say, to also called “Honorary Whites” even in North find their standard cooking ingredients in the America, often because of their “model “ethnic food” aisle of the grocery store. The minority” status. These attributions are related migrants, then, become “ethnic minorities” to the definitions of both terms—race and both because they are referred to as such, but ethnicity—and are not only based on physical also because that is how they come to see characteristics or national heritage but also on themselves. economics, politics and culture. It is widely believed that the concept of Furthermore, in modern history, the Japanese ethnicity has long been with us. However, it is have also tried to separate themselves from actually a very new notion. The termother Asians or East Asians, regarding “ethnicity,” together with terms like “ethnic themselves as equal to, or equivalent to, community,” “ethnic group,” “ethnicWesterners and superior to many of their Asian minorities,” and “ethnic identity,” has been neighbors. These feelings fueled Japanese used habitually only since the 1960s. The more nationalism and provided one rationale for the such terms have been used, the more scholars invasion and colonization of Asian nations in have started asking: What are the differences the years 1895-1945 (e.g., Beasley 1991; between “ethnicity” and already existing terms, Guelgher 2006; Kang 2005; Ohno 2006). Even such as social class and race? For example, in today it is often said that Japanese treat Asians 1967 in his bookRace Relations, Michael more harshly than white people—whether they Banton stated that ethnicity was formed by the are casual visitors or long-term residents such members of the minority groups themselves as second, third and fourth generation Koreans and race was a public classification of those in Japan (e.g., Ryang 2005). While the Japanese minorities by those outside the group.are keen to separate themselves from other However, this claim has many exceptions. For Asians, some Nikkei also try to separate instance, ethnicity is also used for public themselves from Japanese (e.g., Creighton actions like “ethnic cleansing” in Yugoslavia, 2010: 133-162). and a “race” categorization—black Why do Nikkei try to see themselves as identity—has been used to foster solidarity different from Japanese from Japan? “What is among those of African heritage. Regardless of Japanese?” “What is Nikkei?” “What is race?” scholarly consensus or debate, race and “What is ethnicity?” ethnicity have remained two of the most ambiguous and contested terms in the social What Is Ethnicity and Race? sciences. The American Anthropological Association, in When race and ethnicity are discussed,its seminal 1998 statement on race, says: Japanese are not typically the first group of people to come to mind. However, the Japanese actually are an interesting case meriting study. In the United States both scholars For example, although Japanese have been and the general public have been categorized as “Asian,” “Yellow,” “Pacific conditioned to viewing human Islander,” or “Oriental” in North America, in races as natural and separate South Africa Japanese were labeled as divisions within the human species 2 8 | 37 | 4 APJ | JF based on visible physical Japanese painting of Admiral Perry and differences…Physical variations in two officers, 1854 (Fitzwilliam Museum) any given trait tend to occur gradually rather than abruptly over 2 Many people believe that a black-and-white geographic areas. dichotomy is a natural classification of the human mind, and argue that this as a basis for For the general public, especially in the West, racial classification (Banton 1987: xii–xiv). In these “visible physical differences” arethis conception, the human mind is naturally customarily reduced to skin color. Why is skin structured to see the world in binary color used as the basis for racial classification? oppositions (Levi-Strauss 1967). But even if the Living in societies that do this, people believe it concept of binary oppositions is a natural is obvious and logical, because skin color is one structure of the human mind, why is skin color of the most visible human characteristics, and selected? We could still categorize people by it is easy to tell someone’s geographic “home” other criteria, like hairy versus non-hairy. For by using it. Of course, this is just custom and example, I mentioned that Japanese used terms has no basis in reality. Such visible criteria like ke-tō (Westerner, “hairy Chinese”) and kara-bito (foreigner, “Chinese person”) to label could easily be replaced by something 3 outsiders. The word “ke” literally means “hair” else. For example, when first seeing people and the words “tō” and “kara” mean Chinese. from Europe and North America, Japanese Thus, the literal meaning of ke-tō is “hairy called them a variety of things, includingaoi Chinese.” The fact that this term could be me no hito (blue-eyed people), ke-tō (hairy extended to all outsiders is derived from the Chinese),4 and hana no takai-hito (big-nosed idea that Chinese (tō) were outsiders or people). For the Japanese, the physical foreigners in the eyes of Japanese throughout characteristics they noticed most were not the country’s history (and often the only based on skin color. It is true that skin-color- outsiders they saw for long periods of time). based terms do exist among the Japanese—for When the Japanese first saw Westerners, they example, hakujin (white people)—but these were struck by their hairy bodies. As a result, were originally used by Japanese migrants to they called these new foreigners “hairy North America after they arrived there, or were foreigners” to distinguish them from other based on Western categorizations. “non-hairy foreigners” like Chinese and Koreans. Japanese saw chest hair and hairy arms in relation to animal’s fur. They saw Western people as in the process of evolving, so Westerners were closer to monkeys and apes, thus more “primitive.” On the other hand, kara- bito, the non-hairy foreigners, were at a higher stage of human evolution. Just as black and white became racial synonyms for inferior and superior in the Euro-American lexicon, “hairy” and “non-hairy” took on the same connotations. People are prone to categorize others in relation to characteristics they feel they have that are superior. Thus, ke-tō became a 3 8 | 37 | 4 APJ | JF derogatory word in Japanese like the “N” word Remnants of this still linger. The best in English. contemporary example is Barack Obama. This child of a European American mother and an The American Anthropological Association’s African father is called the “First Black 1998 report clearly states that skin-color-based President.” By contrast, in Brazil there are racial categorization is not founded on any many different skin-color-based classifications scientific evidence, but is a product ofof people and terms for them (e.g., Harris historical and contemporary social, economic, 1964; Hasenbalg 1991). Some say there are educational, and political circumstances. In upwards of two hundred such words in contrast to ethnicity, race and race-related Brazilian Portuguese. What is the significance words have a written past going back almost of these different categorizations? Are there two hundred years.