DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Stages of Marine Fishes Occurring in the Iberian Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Stages of Marine Fishes Occurring in the Iberian Peninsula CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 5 TERMINOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................... 8 IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................... 13 EARLY LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTIONS .......................................................................................................... 17 CLUPEIDAE ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) ............................................................................................... 22 Sprattus sprattus (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................................. 26 ENGRAULIDAE ................................................................................................................................... 30 Engraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) .......................................................................................... 30 GONOSTOMATIDAE ............................................................................................................................. 34 Cyclothone braueri Jespersen & Tåning, 1926 .................................................................................. 34 STERNOPTYCHIDAE ............................................................................................................................ 36 Maurolicus muelleri (Gmelin, 1789) ................................................................................................. 36 STOMIIDAE ....................................................................................................................................... 38 Stomias boa (Risso, 1810) .............................................................................................................. 38 ARGENTINIDAE .................................................................................................................................. 40 Argentina sphyraena Linnaeus, 1758 ............................................................................................... 40 MYCTOPHIDAE ................................................................................................................................... 42 Benthosema glaciale (Reinhardt, 1837) ........................................................................................... 42 Ceratoscopelus maderensis (Lowe, 1839) ........................................................................................ 44 Diogenichthys atlanticus (Tåning, 1928) .......................................................................................... 46 Electrona risso (Cocco, 1829) ......................................................................................................... 48 Myctophum punctatum Rafinesque, 1810 ........................................................................................ 50 Notolychnus valdiviae (Brauer, 1904) .............................................................................................. 52 PARALEPIDIDAE ................................................................................................................................. 54 Magnisudis atlantica (Krøyer, 1868) ................................................................................................ 54 Paralepis coregonoides Risso, 1820 ................................................................................................. 56 ANGUILLIDAE .................................................................................................................................... 58 Anguilla anguilla (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................................... 58 MURAENIDAE .................................................................................................................................... 60 Muraena helena Linnaeus, 1758 ...................................................................................................... 60 CONGRIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 62 Conger conger (Linnaeus, 1758) ..................................................................................................... 62 OPHICHTIDAE .................................................................................................................................... 64 Ophisurus serpens (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................................................................... 64 BELONIDAE ....................................................................................................................................... 66 Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1761) ...................................................................................................... 66 MACRORAMPHOSIDAE ........................................................................................................................ 68 Macroramphosus scolopax (Linnaeus, 1758) .................................................................................... 68 SYNGNATHIDAE ................................................................................................................................. 70 Entelurus aequoraeus (Linnaeus, 1758) ........................................................................................... 70 Hipoccampus guttulatus Cuvier, 1829 .............................................................................................. 72 Hippocampus hippocampus (Linnaeus, 1758) .................................................................................. 74 Nerophis lumbriciformis (Jenyns, 1835) ........................................................................................... 76 Nerophis ophidion (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................................ 78 Syngnathus abaster Risso, 1826 ..................................................................................................... 80 Syngnathus acus Linnaeus, 1758 .................................................................................................... 82 Syngnathus typhle Linnaeus, 1758 .................................................................................................. 84 MERLUCCIDAE ................................................................................................................................... 86 Merluccius merluccius Linnaeus, 1758 ............................................................................................. 86 GADIDAE .......................................................................................................................................... 88 Ciliata mustela (Linnaeus, 1758) ..................................................................................................... 88 Gadiculus argenteus Guichenot, 1850 .............................................................................................. 90 Micromessistius poutassou (Risso, 1827) ......................................................................................... 92 1 Pollachius pollachius (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................................................................. 94 Trisopterus luscus (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................................ 96 Trisopterus minutus (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................................................................. 98 ZEIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 100 Zeus faber Linnaeus, 1758 ............................................................................................................ 100 CAPROIDAE ..................................................................................................................................... 102 Caprus aper (Linnaeus, 1758) ....................................................................................................... 102 SERRANIDAE ................................................................................................................................... 104 Serranus cabrilla (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................................ 104 MORONIDAE .................................................................................................................................... 106 Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758) .......................................................................................... 106 CEPOLIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 108 Cepola macrophthalma Linnaeus, 1758 ......................................................................................... 108 CARANGIDAE ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deep-Water Sinkholes and Bioherms of South Florida and the Pourtalès Terrace — Habitat and Fauna
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 77(2): 267–296, 2005 CORAL REEF PAPER DEEP-WATER SINKHOLES AND BIOHERMS OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE POURTALÈS TERRACE — HABITAT AND FAUNA John K. Reed, Shirley A. Pomponi, Doug Weaver, Charles K. Paull, and Amy E. Wright ABSTRACT Only a small percentage of deep-water reefs have had their benthic and fish re- sources characterized. This study surveyed eight deep-water, high-relief, hard-bot- tom sites off south Florida using human occupied submersibles to characterize habitat and describe the fish and macrobenthic communities: the Naples deep-water sink- hole on the southwest Florida shelf, Jordan and Marathon deep-water sinkholes on the Pourtalès Terrace, and five high-relief bioherms on the Pourtalès Terrace. These submersible dives were the first to enter and explore any of these features. The up- per sinkhole rims ranged from 175 to 461 m in depth and had a maximum relief of 180 m. The Jordan sinkhole may be one of the deepest and largest sinkholes known. The high-relief bioherms occurred at depths of 198–319 m, with a maximum height of 120 m. A total of 26 and 16 fish taxa were identified from the sinkhole and bio- herm sites, respectively. Species of potentially commercial importance included tilefish, sharks, speckled hind, yellowedge grouper, warsaw grouper, snowy grouper, blackbelly rosefish, red porgy, drum, scorpionfish, amberjack, and phycid hakes. In total, 66 Porifera taxa were identified and four are possible new species. Twenty- one species of Cnidaria included Antipatharia (three spp.), stylasterid hydrocorals (five spp.), octocorals (11 spp.), and one scleractinian.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of Digenetic Trematodes from West African Marine Fishes1
    192 PROCEEDINGS OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY Zoogeography of Digenetic Trematodes from West African Marine Fishes1 JACOB H. FISCHTHAL Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13901. ABSTRACT: Of the 107 species of trematodes found in West African (Mauritania to Gabon) marine fishes, 100 are allocated to 64 genera in 24 families while seven are immature didymozoids. Many of these genera are located in most of the world's seas with the exception of the polar seas; only five are en- demic to West Africa. The data for the 41 species known from West Africa and elsewhere, and those morphologically closest to the 55 endemic species, indicate that they are very widely distributed, particularly in the Western and North Atlantic, and Mediterranean. Historical and present- day events concerning physical and biological environmental factors and their effects on actual and po- tential hosts as well as on life cycle stages of the trematodes have resulted in the geographical distribution reported. The distribution of marine fishes has been emphasized to explain in part the trematode distribu- tion. Studies on the geographical distribution of (Gulf of Guinea from 5° S to 15° N) and digenetic trematodes of marine fishes in various warm temperate Mauritania have been pre- seas have been presented by Manter (1955, sented by Ekman (1953), Buchanan (1958), 1963, 1967), Szidat (1961), and Lebedev Longhurst (1962), and Ingham (1970). (1969), but West African waters were not included as sufficient data were not available Zoogeographical Distribution until more recently. The digenetic trematodes Of the 107 species of trematodes found in of West African marine fishes (mainly shore West African fishes, 100 are allocated to 64 and shelf inhabitants) have been reported by genera in 24 families while seven are immature Dollfus (1929, 1937a, b, 1946, 1951, 1960), didymozoids of unknown generic status (Ap- Dollfus and Capron (1958), Thomas (1959, pendix I).
    [Show full text]
  • Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C
    click for previous page Zeiformes: Parazenidae 1203 Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C. Heemstra, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, South Africa iagnostic characters: Small to moderate-sized (to 30 cm) oblong fishes, the head and body com- Dpressed; body depth slightly less than head length, contained 2.6 to 2.9 times in standard length; head naked, the bones thin and soft; opercular bones weakly serrate; mouth large, terminal, the upper jaw extremely protrusile; maxilla widely expanded posteriorly, and mostly exposed when mouth is closed; no supramaxilla; jaws with 1 or 2 rows of small, slender, conical teeth; vomer with a few short stout teeth;gill rakers (including rudiments) 2 on upper limb, 8 on lower limb.Eye diameter about 1/3 head length and slightly less than snout length.Branchiostegal rays 7.Dorsal fin divided, with 8 slender spines and 26 to 30 soft rays; anal fin with 1 minute spine and 30 to 32 soft rays; dorsal-, anal-, and pectoral-fin rays un- branched; caudal fin forked, with 11 principal rays and 9 branched rays; pectoral fin with 15 or 16 rays, shorter than eye diameter; pelvic fins with 1 unbranched and 5 or 6 branched soft rays, but no spine, fin origin posterior to a vertical at pectoral-fin base. Scales moderate in size, weakly ctenoid, and deciduous; 2 lateral lines originating on body at upper end of operculum and running posteriorly about 4 scale rows apart, gradually converging to form a single line on caudal peduncle. Caudal peduncle stout, the least depth about equal to its length and slightly less than eye diameter.Vertebrae 34.Colour: body reddish or silvery; large black blotch on anterior margin of dorsal fin.
    [Show full text]
  • Maurolicus Muelleri) Larvae and Life-History Consequences1 Arild Folkvord, Geir Gundersen, Jon Albretsen, Lars Asplin, Stein Kaartvedt, and Jarl Giske
    163 ARTICLE Impact of hatch date on early life growth and survival of Mueller’s pearlside (Maurolicus muelleri) larvae and life-history consequences1 Arild Folkvord, Geir Gundersen, Jon Albretsen, Lars Asplin, Stein Kaartvedt, and Jarl Giske Abstract: Growth and survival of Maurolicus muelleri larvae in Herdlefjorden, Norway, were investigated by daily otolith incre- ment analysis. While high egg densities were generally observed throughout the spawning season, three cohorts each with a narrow window of hatching dates were identified. The first of these cohorts was characterized by low growth and poor morphometric condition and disappeared from the fjord during autumn. High-resolution drift modeling indicated that Herdlef- jorden had a net export of larvae and negligible import in the period cohort 1 disappeared. Yet, the advective loss rate of larvae was not considered high enough to explain the near complete disappearance of the first cohort. An otolith-based growth chronology indicated that growth conditions in Herdlefjorden improved noticeably around mid-September and remained favorable the following month. The analysis of daily otolith increments could thus be used to document within-season variability in larval growth and survival. The low and variable survival due to short-term fluctuations in environmental conditions indicate that multiple batch spawning is an adequately evolved life-history strategy for marine planktivorous fish such as M. muelleri. Résumé : La croissance et la survie des larves de Maurolicus muelleri dans le Herdlefjorden (Norvège) ont été étudiées par l'analyse des incréments quotidiens d'otolithes. Si de fortes densités d'œufs ont été généralement observées durant toute la saison de frai, trois cohortes ont néanmoins été identifiées, chacune présentant sa propre fourchette restreinte de dates d'éclosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 554-626, 1993 PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY: A SURVEY OF ACANTHOMORPHS AND A NEW PROPOSAL G. David Johnson and Colin Patterson ABSTRACT The interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes are reviewed. We recognize seven mono- phyletic terminal taxa among acanthomorphs: Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracan- thopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, and a new taxon named Smeg- mamorpha. The Percomorpha, as currently constituted, are polyphyletic, and the Perciformes are probably paraphyletic. The smegmamorphs comprise five subgroups: Synbranchiformes (Synbranchoidei and Mastacembeloidei), Mugilomorpha (Mugiloidei), Elassomatidae (Elas- soma), Gasterosteiformes, and Atherinomorpha. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is justified elsewhere; we have found no new characters to substantiate the monophyly of Polymixi- iformes (which is not in doubt) or Paracanthopterygii. Stephanoberyciformes uniquely share a modification of the extrascapular, and Beryciformes a modification of the anterior part of the supraorbital and infraorbital sensory canals, here named Jakubowski's organ. Our Zei- formes excludes the Caproidae, and characters are proposed to justify the monophyly of the group in that restricted sense. The Smegmamorpha are thought to be monophyletic principally because of the configuration of the first vertebra and its intermuscular bone. Within the Smegmamorpha, the Atherinomorpha and Mugilomorpha are shown to be monophyletic elsewhere. Our Gasterosteiformes includes the syngnathoids and the Pegasiformes
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List
    SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Lebetus scorpioides English name: Scientific name: Diminutive goby Lebetus scorpioides Taxonomical group: Species authority: Class: Actinopterygii Collett, 1874 Order: Perciformes Family: Gobiidae Subspecies, Variations, Synonyms: – Generation length: 1.3 years Past and current threats (Habitats Directive Future threats (Habitats Directive article 17 article 17 codes): Not known codes): Not known IUCN Criteria: HELCOM Red List DD – Category: Data Deficient Global / European IUCN Red List Category: Habitats Directive: NE/NE – Previous HELCOM Red List Category (2007): RA Protection and Red List status in HELCOM countries: Denmark –/–, Estonia –/–, Finland –/–, Germany –/–, Latvia –/–, Lithuania –/–, Poland –/–, Russia –/–, Sweden –/DD Distribution and status in the Baltic Sea region The diminutive goby is a small and easily overlooked fish occurring in coastal waters along the north- eastern coasts of Europe (Froese & Pauly 2012). It is rarely recorded in the Skagerrak and Kattegat and virtually nothing is known about its occurrence within the HELCOM area. Diminutive goby. The distance between scale marks is 1 mm. Photos: Erling Svensen of male (left), UW Photo and David Andersson of female (right), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.. © HELCOM Red List Fish and Lamprey Species Expert Group 2013 www.helcom.fi > Baltic Sea trends > Biodiversity > Red List of species SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Lebetus scorpioides Distribution map The map shows the sub-basins in the HELCOM area where the species is known to occur regularly and to reproduce (HELCOM 2012). © HELCOM Red List Fish and Lamprey Species Expert Group 2013 www.helcom.fi > Baltic Sea trends > Biodiversity > Red List of species SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Lebetus scorpioides Habitat and ecology A marine and bottom living species found at depths from 20 to 375 meters on shell and gravel bottoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.53
    'I', . FISRES OF '!'RE GULF OF MAINE. 101 Description.-The hickory shad differs rather Bay, though it is found in practically all of them. noticeably from the sea herring in that the point This opens the interesting possibility that the of origin of its dorsal fin is considerably in front of "green" fish found in Chesapeake Bay, leave the the mid-length of its trunk; in its deep belly (a Bay, perhaps to spawn in salt water.65 hickory shad 13~ in. long is about 4 in. deep but a General range.-Atlantic coast of North America herring of that length is only 3 in. deep) ; in the fact from the Bay of Fundy to Florida. that its outline tapers toward both snout and tail Occurrence in the Gulf oj Maine.-The hickory in side view (fig. 15); and in that its lower jaw shad is a southern fish, with the Gulf of Maine as projects farther beyond the upper when its mouth the extreme northern limit to its range. It is is closed; also, by the saw-toothed edge of its belly. recorded in scientific literature only at North Also, it lacks the cluster of teeth on the roof of the· Truro; at Provincetown; at Brewster; in Boston mouth that is characteristic of the herring. One Harbor; off Portland; in Casco Ba3T; and from the is more likely to confuse a hickory shad with a shad mouth of the Bay of Fundy (Huntsman doubts or with the alewives, which it resembles in the this record), and it usually is so uncommon within position of its dorsal fin, in the great depth of its our limits that we have seen none in the Gulf body, in its saw-toothed belly and in the lack of ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes-Of-The-Salish-Sea-Pp18.Pdf
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 18 Fishes of the Salish Sea: a compilation and distributional analysis Theodore W. Pietsch James W. Orr September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce Papers NMFS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientifi c Editor Administrator Richard Langton National Marine Fisheries Service National Marine Northeast Fisheries Science Center Fisheries Service Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Offi ce of Science and Technology Fisheries Research and Monitoring Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientifi c Publications Offi ce 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service - The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is published by the Scientifi c Publications Offi ce, National Marine Fisheries Service, The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, fl ora and fauna studies, and data- Seattle, WA 98115. intensive reports on investigations in fi shery science, engineering, and economics. The Secretary of Commerce has Copies of the NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series are available free in limited determined that the publication of numbers to government agencies, both federal and state. They are also available in this series is necessary in the transac- exchange for other scientifi c and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Length-Weight Relationships of Marine Fish Collected from Around the British Isles
    Science Series Technical Report no. 150 Length-weight relationships of marine fish collected from around the British Isles J. F. Silva, J. R. Ellis and R. A. Ayers Science Series Technical Report no. 150 Length-weight relationships of marine fish collected from around the British Isles J. F. Silva, J. R. Ellis and R. A. Ayers This report should be cited as: Silva J. F., Ellis J. R. and Ayers R. A. 2013. Length-weight relationships of marine fish collected from around the British Isles. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 150: 109 pp. Additional copies can be obtained from Cefas by e-mailing a request to [email protected] or downloading from the Cefas website www.cefas.defra.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, 2013 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. This publication is also available at www.cefas.defra.gov.uk For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.hmso.gov.uk/copyright/licences/ core/core_licence.htm, or by writing to: HMSO’s Licensing Division St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected] 3 Contents Contents 1. Introduction 5 2.
    [Show full text]