Daniel 10:1-12:13

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daniel 10:1-12:13 Daniel 10:1-12:13 1. Basic outline of last section of Daniel a. Introduction: 10:1-11:1 b. Revelation (11:2-12:4) c. Epilogue (12:5-13) 2. Detailed outline (symbolic vision, or could be defined as “historical apocalypse”) a. Date and circumstances (10:1) b. Daniel’s act of supplication (10:2-3) c. Appearance of messenger (10:4-9) i. Date and circumstance (10:4) ii. Description of messenger (10:5-6) iii. Effect on Daniel (10:7-9) d. Messenger’s dialogue with Daniel (10:10-11:1) i. Daniel is strengthened (10:10-11) ii. Explanatory address (10:12-14) iii. Daniel’s profession of weakness (10:15-17) iv. Daniel strengthened again (10:18-19a) v. Daniel urges messenger to speak (10:19b) vi. Another explanatory address (10:20-11:1) e. Revelation (11:1-12:4) i. Introductory statement (11:2a) ii. Kings of Persia (11:2b) iii. Warrior King (11:3-4) iv. Conflict between North and South kings (11:5-9) v. Rise and fall of king of North (11:10-19) vi. King who exacts tribute (11:20) vii. Career of contemptible person (11:21-45) (1) His rise to success (11:21-24) (2) attack on south and holy covenant (11:25-28) (3) more attacks (11:29-35) (4) attack on God of gods (11:36-39) (5) final attack and fall (11:40-45) viii. Deliverance of faithful (12:1-3) ix. Conclusion: seal book (12:4) f. Epilogue (12:5-13) i. Epiphany of two heavenly beings (12:5) ii. Dialogue between heavenly beings (12:6-7) iii. Daniel asks for an explanation (12:8) iv. Closing address (12:9-13) (1) command to Daniel (12:9) (2) summary of events to come (12:10-12) (3) command to Daniel (12:13) g. NOTE: There is a chiasm here i. Comment on purpose of messenger coming (10:20a) ii. Messenger’s struggle (10:20b) iii. Comment on purpose (10:21a) iv. Messenger’s struggle (10:21b-11:1) v. Comment on purpose (11:2b) 3. Similarity in literary style between 8:23-25 and 11:3-45, and also similar in style to Uruk Prophecy, Dynastic Prophecy (both pre-hellenistic, and from this part of world) Verse/History Notes 11:2b-12:4 4. Is it 4 kings counting Cyrus, or not? Disagreement on that point... a. 13 Persian rulers from Cyrus the Great to Darius III... so who are the ones in view here? i. four named in HB: Cyrus, Darius, Ahasuerus (Xerxes) and Artaxerxes ii. wealthy 4th king: Darius III? (Not the Darius of Ezra and Nehemiah) who was last? iii. Xerxes I was rich, invaded an un-unified Greece, but who was beaten in battle in 480 (bit early to see him as 4th king, perhaps) iv. Jerome – “the Spirit of prophecy was not concerned about preserving historical detail but in summarizing only the most important matters” v. others point out that “three... and the fourth” is an idiom used in wisdom (Prov 30:15-31) and some prophetic (Amos 1-2) to indicate a totality of examples (1) in which case this summarizes nature of Persian empire and the spirit of its rulers who grab wealth, grow strong and provoke the Greeks 5. “Warrior-king” – Alexander the Great. a. Defeats Darius III of Persia in 330 b. Diadochi (“heirs”) take over empire after his death i. Greece (plus Macedonia) ii. Thrace and Asia Minor iii. Northern Syria, Mesopotamia and east iv. Southern Syria, Palestine, Egypt c. Seleucus I had Babylonia, but was attached by Antigonus (another of the generals, ruler of Asia Minor) and so flees to Egypt and works for Ptolemy I as one of his generals. These two together, in 312, defeat Antigonus, and Seleucus regained Babylonia. Antigonus is killed in 301 by the other Diadochi, and in time Seleucus takes the largest of the four empires, having extended into Asia Minor. 6. Verse 6: In about 250, Ptolemy II and Antiochus II make alliance, sealed with Ptolemy’s daughter Berenice. Antiochus ditches 1st wife (Laodice) for Berenice, and disinherits first set of kids for her and their new son. 2 years later reconciles with first wife, Laodice, who then kills not only Antiochus, but Berenice and her son. Shortly after (within same year), Ptolemy II dies. 7. Verses 7-9: Ptolemy III succeeds father Ptolemy II in 246. He then invades Seleucid Empire by land and sea. Laodice is taken captive and killed at this time, and the images of gods Cambyses took from Egypt in 525 are captured and taken back to Egypt (earning Ptolemy III the label of “benefactor”). Seleucus II able to stabilize rule, and two years later in 242, even attached Egypt, though he was later forced to withdraw. 8. Verse 10: Seleucus III succeeded Seleucus II, reigns for a short time, being killed in 223 by Antiochus III (Antiochus the Great), who by 219is moving south towards Egypt. 9. Verses 11-12: Ptolemy IV countered the move by Antiochus III , and the two met in battle in 217. According to Polybius, Ptolemy had 70,000 infantry, 5000 cavalry and 73 elephants. Antiochus had 62,000 infantry, 6000 cavalry and 103 elephants. Antiochus gets royally wailed on (17,000 men lost, to Ptolemy’s 2,200). Ptolemy takes Palestine, southern Syria but stops there and makes peace. 10. Verses 13-14: Ptolemy V (infant) with Agathocles (as regent) rule Egypt. Antiochus takes this opportunity, and invades southern Syria and Palestine, supported by Philip V of Macedonia. Initially defeated by Egyptians, he defeats Egyptian army at Battle of Banias (Paneas) in 200. i. Josephus suggests Jerusalem was divided into pro-Ptolemy and pro- Seleucid factions, giving us “the violent among your people” 11. Verses 15-17: Likely a reference to siege of Sidon by Antiochus. Growing power of Rome leads him to guve his daughter Cleopatra (born Seleucid) to Ptolemy V as his wife. This backfires, as she sides with her husband, even bringing Egypt and Rome together in an alliance against her own father. So Antiochus’ plans did “not succeed, or come about for him.” 12. Verses 18-19: Antiochus took other areas of Asia Minor held by Egypt, then moved against Philip V’s Asia Minor territories, as his power was declining. Even moved into Thrace, and invaded Greece in 192, against wishes of Rome. Rome moved to defend Greece, and in 191 Antiochus was beaten at Thermopylae. Further beating in 190 BCE followed “put an end to his insolence.” Antiochus became vassal of Rome in 189 under very bad terms. Killed in 187, he overreached himself in Greece, “stumble and fall” and then “could not be found.” 13. Verse 20: Seleucus IV became king. Inherited debt of father, so goal was to restore fortune. Sent prime minster, Heliodorus (“tribute collector”), to plunder Jerusalem temple. (This story told in 2 Macc 3) Heliodorus prevented by heavenly creature (angel?) that nearly killed him. a. possible connection here with Zech 9:8, and the “one who sends around a tribute collector” 14. Verse 21: Seleucus IV, just prior to death, sent his son to Rome as hostage in exchange for Antiochus IV. Antiochus arrives home with an army from Pergamum, and seizes throne, claiming to do so on behalf of Seleucus IV’s younger son Antiochus. Heliodorus flees, and younger nephew murdered in 170. (Verse 20: he is not rightful heir– speaking of Antiochus IV, who seizes power, stopping Heliodorus from same (20b) and by claiming to act as regent (20c)) 15. Verses 22-24: a. Some argue these are general statements about Antiochus IV, and what he reign was like. i. made alliances, and kept them only as long as convenient for him... ii. had only limited support from Pergamum iii. lots of evidence of his avarice iv. disgustingly indulgent of his supporters, or those who’s support he wanted v. this view has difficulty with “a prince of the covenant” however... b. modern commentators see section as reference to Onias III, the high priest at this time (1) Onias was opposed to hellenization (2) Onias’ brother Jason offered large bribe and promise of hellenization in Jerusalem in exchange for being High Priest (Torah law was HP was by heredity) (3) in 172, Menelaus offered Antiochus even bigger bribes than Jason, and so he became High Priest (not even of the family) (i) later kills Onias (4) from this point on (23-24) we see a general picture of Antiochus’ dealings in Jerusalem c. regardless of which is right, three key elements: i. Antiochus is “new Assyria” (Is 10:22-23; 28:15-22) ii. he will do what those who came before him have not (picked up again in 37-38) iii. his career is divinely limited 16. Verses 25-28 a. Cleopatra died, leaving a young Ptolemy VI as ruler. Two courtiers, Eulaeus and Lenaeus then effectively take over control of Egypt. In 169 Ptolemies and Seleucids meet in battle at Pelusium. Egypt is defeated, Ptolemy VI flees but is captured by Antiochus. His brother, Ptolemy VII, is then made ruler by the two courtiers. Antiochus attacks Egypt, but is unable to capture Alexandria. Under guise of supporting Ptolemy VI, Antiochus sets him up with a government in Memphis, and effectively controls most of Egypt. Later, Ptolemy VI and VII are reconciled and work as joint rulers of Egypt (verses 27-28a) i. Some confusion around what happens in Jerusalem with these attacks on Egypt. 1 attack or two? We don’t know.
Recommended publications
  • 2 Maccabees, Chapter 1 Letter 1: 124 B.C
    Archdiocese of St. Louis Office of Sacred Worship Lectio Divina Bible The Second Book of Maccabees Second Maccabees can be divided as follows: I. Letters to the Jews in Egypt II. Author’s Preface III. Heliodorus’ Attempt to Profane the Temple IV. Profanation and Persecution V. Victories of Judas and Purification of the Temple VI. Renewed Persecution VII. Epilogue * * * Lectio Divina Read the following passage four times. The first reading, simple read the scripture and pause for a minute. Listen to the passage with the ear of the heart. Don’t get distracted by intellectual types of questions about the passage. Just listen to what the passage is saying to you, right now. The second reading, look for a key word or phrase that draws your attention. Notice if any phrase, sentence or word stands out and gently begin to repeat it to yourself, allowing it to touch you deeply. No elaboration. In a group setting, you can share that word/phrase or simply pass. The third reading, pause for 2-3 minutes reflecting on “Where does the content of this reading touch my life today?” Notice what thoughts, feelings, and reflections arise within you. Let the words resound in your heart. What might God be asking of you through the scripture? In a group setting, you can share your reflection or simply pass. The fourth reading, pause for 2-3 minutes reflecting on “I believe that God wants me to . today/this week.” Notice any prayerful response that arises within you, for example a small prayer of gratitude or praise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Sources
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note : Geographical landmarks are listed under the proper name itself: for “Cape Sepias” or “Mt. Athos” see “Sepias” or “Athos.” When a people and a toponym share the same base, see under the toponym: for “Thessalians” see “Thessaly.” Romans are listed according to the nomen, i.e. C. Julius Caesar. With places or people mentioned once only, discretion has been used. Abdera 278 Aeaces II 110, 147 Abydus 222, 231 A egae 272–273 Acanthus 85, 207–208, 246 Aegina 101, 152, 157–158, 187–189, Acarnania 15, 189, 202, 204, 206, 251, 191, 200 347, 391, 393 Aegium 377, 389 Achaia 43, 54, 64 ; Peloponnesian Aegospotami 7, 220, 224, 228 Achaia, Achaian League 9–10, 12–13, Aemilius Paullus, L. 399, 404 54–56, 63, 70, 90, 250, 265, 283, 371, Aeolis 16–17, 55, 63, 145, 233 375–380, 388–390, 393, 397–399, 404, Aeschines 281, 285, 288 410 ; Phthiotic Achaia 16, 54, 279, Aeschylus 156, 163, 179 286 Aetoli Erxadieis 98–101 Achaian War 410 Aetolia, Aetolian League 12, 15, 70, Achaius 382–383, 385, 401 204, 250, 325, 329, 342, 347–348, Acilius Glabrio, M. 402 376, 378–380, 387, 390–391, 393, Acragas 119, COPYRIGHTED165, 259–261, 263, 266, 39MATERIAL6–397, 401–404 352–354, 358–359 Agariste 113, 117 Acrocorinth 377, 388–389 Agathocles (Lysimachus ’ son) 343, 345 ; Acrotatus 352, 355 (King of Sicily) 352–355, 358–359; Actium 410, 425 (King of Bactria) 413–414 Ada 297 Agelaus 391, 410 A History of Greece: 1300 to 30 BC, First Edition. Victor Parker.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel 11 Part 22 Talk About Slogging Through! the Historical Details Are Legion in This Section of Scripture
    1 graceWORKS ! GOING DEEPER The Papou Study Bible is a daily study provided by me to help folks explore the depth and joy of the “conneXion” life of God. It’s my personal study, and is not intended as a doctrinal statement or statement of any church or denomination or congregation. It’s also my belief that “grace” works, and the servant of God should always want to go deeper. Multi- tasking as usual, I’m also calling this the “Papou Study Bible.” I’m writing it as if I were speaking to my girls who love me and any descendant they have that love their Papou too. And to anyone who wants to consider me a spiritual Dad or “Papou.” I want them to be able to study the Bible with Papou (grandpa in Greek) after I’m gone---and if they don’t, I’ll haunt them. The Scriptures say it’s noble to “search the Scriptures daily” to verify truth like the ancient Bereans did (Acts 17:11). My folks came from Berea. My incredible Dad (and your grandfather and great grandfather, guys), Vasil Charles Valekis taught me to do this like he did---every day until I die. He taught me and everyone I know to go to church no matter what and to put God first. While Mama (Maria Pagona Stratakis Valekis) never really did this, she made sure we listened to Daddy on this one. She would have hit us with a spatula or frying pan or worse if we didn’t. This is a simple sharing my “daily search.” And I’d like to think it is a continuation of God’s life through my Dad through me.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Roman Frontier1
    Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Impact of Empire Roman Empire, c. 200 B.C.–A.D. 476 Edited by Olivier Hekster (Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) Editorial Board Lukas de Blois Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt Elio Lo Cascio Michael Peachin John Rich Christian Witschel VOLUME 21 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/imem Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Edited by Daniëlle Slootjes and Michael Peachin LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016036673 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 1572-0500 isbn 978-90-04-32561-6 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-32675-0 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Judea/Israel Under the Greek Empires." Israel and Empire: a Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism
    "Judea/Israel under the Greek Empires." Israel and Empire: A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism. Perdue, Leo G., and Warren Carter.Baker, Coleman A., eds. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015. 129–216. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 30 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567669797.ch-005>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 30 September 2021, 15:32 UTC. Copyright © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 5 Judea/Israel under the Greek Empires* In 33130 BCE, by military victory, the Macedonian Alexander ended the Persian Empire. He defeated the Persian king Darius at Gaugamela, advanced to a welcoming Babylon, and progressed to Persepolis where he burned Xerxes palace supposedly in retaliation for Persias invasions of Greece some 150 years previously (Diodorus 17.72.1-6). Thus one empire gave way to another by a different name. So began the Greek empires that dominated Judea/Israel for the next two hundred or so years, the focus of this chapter. Is a postcolonial discussion of these empires possible and what might it highlight? Considerable dif�culties stand in the way. One is the weight of conventional analyses and disciplinary practices which have framed the discourse with emphases on the various roles of the great men, the ruling state, military battles, and Greek settlers, and have paid relatively little regard to the dynamics of imperial power from the perspectives of native inhabitants, the impact on peasants and land, and poverty among non-elites, let alone any reciprocal impact between colonizers and colon- ized.
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 125 (1999) 77–83 © Dr
    DOV GERA PHILONIDES THE EPICUREAN AT COURT: EARLY CONNECTIONS aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 125 (1999) 77–83 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 77 PHILONIDES THE EPICUREAN AT COURT: EARLY CONNECTIONS* P. Herc. 1044 was first published at the turn of this century by W. Crönert, and has since been re- published with extensive new readings and commentary.1 Although very fragmentary, it is a major source for the life of the mathematician and Epicurean philosopher Philonides. Information gleaned from this papyrus and from three inscriptions which relate to the Epicurean and to members of his family has helped to establish his descent and background. Philonides was the eldest son of a respected citizen of Laodiceia-on-Sea in Syria, who was affiliated to the Seleucid court. Both father and son shared the same name and the son had a brother named Dicaearchus.2 Significant improvements in reading and restoration of the papyrus can still be made, e.g. recently Habicht has supplemented the name of Menochares, the epistolagraphos of Demetrius I in lines 2–3 of fr. 10.3 Of special interest to us is the approximate date in which the Epicurean, following in his father’s footsteps, joined the Seleucid court. The papyrus specifically names Antiochus IV Epiphanes (fr. 30) and his nephew Demetrius I Soter (frs. 10, 27), and it is clear that Philonides was a contemporary of both kings.4 The epigraphic material is in general agreement with this. Dicaearchus, Philonides’ brother, was honored by the Delphians for his help to Delphian theoroi who sought an interview with a ‘King Antiochus’ in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Book of Maccabees
    THE FIRST BOOK OF MACCABEES INTRODUCTION THE English Bible, as is well known, originally contained but two so-called Books of the Maccabees. ere are, however, three such books found in the Septuagint, and a fourth bearing the same title in connection with the works of Josephus. ese are all the Books of the Maccabees now existing in Greek. A work, sometimes called the Fih Book of Maccabees, is extant in an Arabic version, which is also known under the title, Historia Maccabœorum Arabica. Only the first two books actually treat of the Mac- cabæan family and their heroic efforts to free their native land from the Syrian yoke. e order in which these several works are usually enumerated is also that of their actual worth. e second book takes up the history at a point a lile earlier than the first (B.C. 176), but covers a period of only fourteen years. e first begins with the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes (B.C. 175), and closes with the death of the high priest Simon (B.C. 135), so including a space of forty years. e third book narrates the history of events which took place before the Maccabæan family appeared on the stage (B.C. 221–204). e fourth makes use of an incident or two found in the second book, the martyrdom of Eleazar with that of the seven brothers and their mother, introduced by an account of the aempt of Apollonius (Heliodorus) to rob the temple, in order to connect with it a philosophical disquisition on the Rule of Reason (Αὐτοκράτορος λογισμοῦ), or the supremacy of the ὄρθος λόγος over the πάθη.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiochus Epiphanes
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 10-1944 Antiochus Epiphanes. Brougher Petty Maddox University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Maddox, Brougher Petty, "Antiochus Epiphanes." (1944). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2011. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2011 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Kaster of Arts Department of History by Brougher Petty Maddox .. \ 1944 -T .4 .4¥ To ,Ida Roe and c. ,Sidney Maddox, my,parents, I, in affectionate appreciation. ABBREVIATIONS App. Syr. Appian, ~oman History Book XI, Ia! Syrian ~. Bactria W. W. Tarn, IQ! Greeks !n Bactria and India. ~ British Museum Catalogue , ) , t CAB Cambridge Ancient HistorI. Diod~ Sic. Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheea \ t Hel. Q1!. W. W. Tarn, Hellenistic Civilisation ~ # I ( H. W. M. Rostovtzeff, Social ~ Economic History 2t the Hellenistic World, 3 Vols. House Sel. E. R. Bevan, House of Seleucus, Vol. II. Bevan, Egypt E. R. Bevan, A History Q! Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Regency in the Seleucid Empire
    Interregnum: Queen Regency in the Seleucid Empire by Stacy Reda A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 © Stacy Reda 2014 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract An examination of the ancient sources indicates that there were possibly seven Queens Regent throughout the course of the Seleucid Dynasty: Apama, Laodice I, Berenice Syra, Laodice III, Laodice IV, Cleopatra I Thea, and Cleopatra II Selene. This thesis examines the institution of Queen Regency in the Seleucid Dynasty, the power and duties held by the Queen Regent, and the relationship between the Queen and her son—the royal heir. This thesis concludes that Queen Regency was not a set office and that there were multiple reasons and functions that could define a queen as a regent. iii Acknowledgements I give my utmost thanks and appreciation to the University of Waterloo’s Department of Classical Studies. The support that I have received from all members of the faculty during my studies has made a great impact on my life for which I will always be grateful. Special thanks to my advisor, Dr. Sheila Ager, for mentoring me through this process, and Dr. Maria Liston (Anthropology) for her support and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in a Multi-Cultural Society: Egypt from Cambyses to Constantine and Beyond
    oi.uchicago.edu Internet publication of this work was made possible with the generous support of Misty and Lewis Gruber LIFE IN A MULTI-CULTURAL SOCIETY: EGYPT FROM CAMBYSES TO CONSTANTINE AND BEYOND Edited by JANET H. JOHNSON THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO STUDIES IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL CIVILIZATION • No. 51 CHICAGO • ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 92-6074 1 ISBN: 0-918986-84-2 The Oriental Institute, Chicago © 1992 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 1992. Printed in the United States of America. Cover Illustration: Facsimile Drawing of the Central Portion of the Rosetta Stone. After Stephen Quirke and Carol Andrews, The Rosetta Stone, facsimile drawing with Introduction and Translations (London: The Trustees of the British Museum, 1988). oi.uchicago.edu CHAPTER 34 IMPLICIT MODELS OF CROSS-CULTURAL INTERACTION: A QUESTION OF NOSES, SOAP, AND PREJUDICE ROBERT K. RITNER The OrientalInstitute* In 1975, a study of the "Limits of Hellenization" by Arnaldo Momigliano began by noting that The philosophic historian will never stop meditating on the nose of Cleopatra. If that nose had pleased the gods as it pleased Caesar and Antony, ... we would have more books on Tutankhamen and on Alexander the Great. But a Latin-speaking Etruscologist, not a Greek-speaking Egyptologist, brought to Britain the fruits of the victory of Roman imperialism over the Hellenistic System. We must face the facts.' * Dr. Ritner now holds the position of Assistant Professor of Egyptology in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Yale University. 1. Momigliano 1975, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Seleucus IV Philopator
    Seleucus IV Philopator home : ancient Persia : ancient Greece : Seleucids : index : article by Jona Lendering source: http://www.livius.org/se-sg/seleucids/seleucus_iv_philopator.html Seleucus IV Philopator Seleucus IV Philopator ('father lover'): name of a Seleucid king, ruled from 187 to 175. Successor of: Antiochus III the Great Relatives: Seleucus IV Philopator Father: Antiochus III the Great Mother: Laodice III (daughter of Mithradates II of Pontus) Wife: his sister (?) Laodice IV Children: Antiochus (murdered in 170) Demetrius I Soter Laodice V (married to Perseus of Macedonia) Main deeds: Born after 220 196: Thrace added to the Seleucid Empire; Seleucus is governor 192-188: Syrian War between the Seleucids and Rome. 190: Seleucus besieges Rome's ally Pergamon, captures the Roman commander Lucius Cornelius Scipio, takes part in the Battle of Magnesia (Roman victory) 189: Co-ruler of his father 188: Peace of Apamea; Seleucid empire has to abandon all land north of the Taurus and pay an indemnity 3 July 187: death of Antiochus III; Seleucus becomes king and tries to restore the Seleucid Empire by diplomatic means 178: Marries his daughter Laodice V to the Macedonian king Perseus, which is regarded by king Eumenes II Soter of Pergamon as an anti-Roman act; Seleucus has to send his son Demetrius as hostage to Rome; in return, his brother Antiochus returns 175: To pay the Roman indemnity, Seleucus orders his commander Heliodorus to obtain money in the temple of Jerusalem, but he encounters opposition. Heliodorus returns. 3 September 175: Heliodorus kills Seleucus; his wife Laodice V appears to have married Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who succeeds his brother Succeeded by: his brother Antiochus IV Epiphanes Page 1 Seleucus IV Philopator Succeeded by: his brother Antiochus IV Epiphanes Sources: 2 Maccabees, 3-4 Appian of Alexandria, Syrian Wars, 45 Livy, History of Rome, 37 Livy, Periochae, 46 Polybius of Megalopolis, World History, 18.51 This brief article has been written to offer background information to the real articles on Livius.Org.
    [Show full text]