DOCSLIB.ORG

Horizons, the AIAA Houston Online Magazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Horizons, the AIAA Houston Online Magazine Volume 31, Number 4 AIAA Houston Section www.aiaa-houston.org March / April 2006 SPACEHAB Apex AIAA Houston Horizons March / April 2006 Page 1 March/April 2006 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S From the Editor 3 HOUSTON Chair’s Corner 4 Horizons is a bi-monthly publication of the Houston section SPACEHAB Apex 5 of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Lunch-n-Learn: Nanobacteria, The Discovery of a New Life Form 7 Jon S. Berndt Lunch-n-Learn: Finite State Dynamic Modeling … 9 Editor Public Policy: Congressional Visits Day 10 AIAA Houston Section Executive Council Dinner Lecture: Saving Saturn V 11 Steven R. King Lunch-n-Learn: Capability Maturity Model Integrated (CMMI) 12 Chair Texas Space Authority Act 12 Dr. Jayant Ramakrishnan Call for Award Nominations 13 Chair-Elect Staying Informed 14 T. Sophia Bright Past Chair Membership Page 15 Dr. Syri Koelfgen Annual Technical Symposium Agenda 16 Secretary Dinner Lecture: Space Shuttle Integration Lessons Learned 17 Dr. Brad Files An Insider’s View Treasurer Local Industry News and Announcements 18 John Keener Tim Propp Vice-Chair, Operations Vice-Chair, Technical Outreach and Education: The Spirit of Apollo Scholarship 19 Operations Technical Calendar 20 Dr. John Valasek Dr. Al Jackson Cranium Cruncher 21 Dr. Rakesh Bhargava Dr. Zafar Taqvi Elizabeth Blome William West Odds and Ends 22 Joy Conrad King Ellen Gillespie Upcoming Conference Presentations by Houston Section Members 24 Daniel Nobles Dr. Michael Lembeck Nicole Smith Aaron Morris AIAA Local Section News 25 Dr. Douglas Schwaab Dr. Kamlesh Lulla Laura Slovey Padraig Moloney Michael Begley Bill Atwell Jon Berndt, Editor Andy Petro Steve King Gary Brown Gary Cowan Paul Nielsen Amy Efting Councilors Brett Anderson Elizabeth Blome Ellen Gillespie This newsletter is created by members of the Houston section. Opinions expressed herein other than Glenn Jenkinson by elected Houston section officers belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily represent the Barry Tobias position of AIAA or the Houston section. Unless explicitly stated, in no way are the comments of Dr. Merri Sanchez individual contributors to Horizons to be construed as necessarily the opinion or position of AIAA, Douglas Yazell NASA, its contractors, or any other organization. Please address all newsletter correspondence to Albert Meza the Editor:[email protected] Mike Oelke JR Reyna Cover: SPACEHAB Apex. Image courtesy of SPACEHAB. More information at: www.aiaa-houston.org/orgchart Galveston Bay sunrise image at top by Cheryl Empey, Seabrook. AIAA Houston Horizons March / April 2006 Page 2 Page 3 From the Editor JON S. BERNDT “… when I talk about "human that is something new. rocket. Granted, the flight was a presence" - I really mean short one, but by all accounts I "settlement" of the solar system. Days ago, six contractors were have read, SpaceX is very com- And I want to pause on that chosen as finalists for considera- mitted to making Falcon work. I word - "settlement" because that's tion for COTS (Commercial Or- believe they will succeed. what we are truly embarking upon bital Transportation Services) con- and that's the really exciting part tracts. The six finalists are Transformational Space Corpora- of what we are about. Now these (according to several space news tion (t/Space) is a company which are the key questions then: How web sites): Rocketplane/Kistler, has key partnerships with other do we sustain the vision for space Andrews Space, Transformational growing space-related companies exploration to lead us to settle- Space Corporation (t/Space), including Scaled Composites, ment? How do we afford it? How Space Exploration Technologies AirLaunch. t/Space also crafted a do we nurture it? My answer - (SpaceX), SpaceDev, and SPACE- creative exploration strategy as and I think a lot of yours' - is the HAB. part of a NASA funded study on private sector.” innovative exploration strategies. One of the earliest and most suc- As part of that strategy, t/Space Are these the words of a “space cessful commercial space ventures proposed some concepts to maxi- frontier” spokesperson? How is of course SPACEHAB, based mize commercial involvement: about these words: right here in the Clear Lake area. SPACEHAB describes their Apex Use CEV program to spur pas- “We are on the verge of incorpo- system (now under development) senger travel to LEO: rating the Solar System into man- in this issue. kind's economic sphere, in a way • If NASA “invents” a competi- that will vastly expand the eco- There have been some concerns tive passenger market through nomic opportunities provided for raised about the COTS program, its contracting strategy, it will all people. Most obviously, the within space circles. Some think reap huge economies of scale. sheer tonnage that we will need to that the total amount of money • Economies make human- put in orbit invites and necessi- said to be allocated for the pro- assisted, in-orbit assembly cost- tates the development of a truly gram (about $500 million) is not effective. commercial space industry. There enough to accomplish anything. are many things needing to be According to NASA, the COTS • Commercial market will rap- done that NASA could purchase program goals are to: idly overtake dollar volume of from an exploration-enabled NASA ETO spending, shifting space industry, including in-space development cost to the private • Implement U.S. Space Explora- fuel delivery, lunar resource pros- sector. tion policy with an investment pecting…” to stimulate commercial enter- prises in space, SpaceDev built the engine that The latter, recent, comment is powered SpaceShipOne to its X- from NASA Administrator Mike • Facilitate U.S. private industry Prize victory. Griffin. The first quote is from demonstration of cargo and the newly appointed NASA Ames crew space transportation capa- When considering the current Research Center director, Simon bilities with the goal of achieving state — and the potential — of P. “Pete” Worden, in a statement reliable, cost effective access to commercial space companies made just days ago at the Interna- low-Earth orbit, today, I have to agree with Pete tional Space Development Con- • Create a market environment in Worden’s words (Worden par- ference. [from www.spaceref. which commercial space trans- ticipated in the first President com] That “space settlement” and portation services are available Bush’s Space Exploration Initia- tive): “We are off to a much better “space commercialization” are to Government and private sec- start now than we were in 1989.” being talked about at this high tor customers. level may not be something terri- — JSB bly new or unheard of. That real As seen above, one of the COTS money is in play to increase in- goals is to facilitate—not to fully centive for private firms to dem- fund development of anything. onstrate provision of services that SpaceX has already demonstrated NASA could purchase … perhaps the ability to build and launch a AIAA Houston Horizons March / April 2006 Page 3 Page 4 Chair’s Corner STEVE KING, AIAA HOUSTON CHAIR “All Hail Columbia!” was the toast Visit the Houston Section website Mercury through Skylab, the Rus- of the day a quarter century ago as to view Mr. Bejmuk’s entire pres- sian human space program, com- STS-1 took flight. While the entation. Too often we have all mercial satellites, interplanetary Shuttle is still a magnificent flying seen organizations reinventing the probes, dissimilar industries, etc. machine; its high operational cost, proverbial wheel and end up step- Look to the AIAA’s extensive limited crew escape options, and ping on the same mines. One of electronic libraries as a key re- other vulnerabilities justify the Bo’s messages was that develop- source at your finger tips to ex- need for its retirement in 2010. ment of the Constellation ele- plore our aerospace history, why ments will have their share of things were done a certain way, On the brighter side, the Shuttle challenges, so there is no need to and what things would be done Program does provide the engi- revisit the scares and minefields of differently if they had a chance. neers and planners of our next Shuttle. generation of human spacecraft Let’s continue the journey… with a tremendous treasure trove But don’t limit yourself to just the of lessons learned. Many of them Shuttle, there is a rich history of were excellently presented by Bo valuable lessons learned from Bejmuk, Boeing’s Orbiter Pro- gram Director, at the Houston Section dinner meeting on April 5th. A few of these that stood out to me involved: · Not allowing operations and maintenance to take the back seat to satisfying performance require- ments. It is felt that this added up to $40B to Shuttle operations over its history. Excessive operational cost also contributed to the ending of the Apollo program even when most of the hardware for three additional flights to the moon was already built. · Having sufficient margin (or con- servatism) in your design to cover environment and analysis uncer- tainties. Performance needs drove a lot of Shuttle hardware, which does have appropriate fac- tors of safety applied, to have very limit margin. Even today the Shuttle experiences redesign and repair to correct hardware nega- tive margins resulting from refined analysis, additional testing, and flight experience. Often these changes create a domino effect resulting in added cost, excessive turnaround maintenance periods, and exposure of other subsystems to damage during repairs. · A need for a strong, vocal inte- gration organization which it not the first to be reduced when budg- ets get tight. · Test, test, test… AIAA Houston Horizons March / April 2006 Page 4 Page 5 SPACEHAB Apex Feature ELAINA POLSEN, SPACEHAB, INC Article While attention is focused on NASA’s goals are to make an in- company has seen significant inter- NASA’s return to flight and the vestment to stimulate commercial est from various and diverse mar- Agency’s new Crew Exploration enterprises in space; support pri- ket sectors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1957 – the Year the Space Age Began Conditions in 1957
    1957 – The Year the Space Age Began Roger L. Easton, retired Naval Research Laboratory Linda Hall Library Kansas City MO 6 September 2007 Conditions in 1957 z Much different from now, slower, more optimistic in some ways z Simpler, yet very frightening, time 1 1957 in Politics z January 20: Second Presidential Inauguration of Dwight Eisenhower 1957 in Toys z First “Frisbee” from Wham-O 2 1957 in Sports z Third Year of Major League Baseball in Kansas City z the “Athletics,” not the “Royals” 1957 in Sports z No pro football in Kansas City z AFL was three years in future z no Chiefs until 1963 3 1957 at Home z No microwave ovens z (TV dinners since 1954) z Few color television sets z (first broadcasts late in 1953) z No postal Zip Codes z Circular phone diales z No cell phones z (heck, no Area Codes, no direct long-distance dialing!) z No Internet, no personal computers z Music recorded on vinyl discs, not compact or computer disks 1957 in Transportation z Gas cost 27¢ per gallon z September 4: Introduction of the Edsel by Ford Motor Company z cancelled in 1959 after loss of $250M 4 1957 in Transportation z October 28: rollout of first production Boeing 707 1957 in Science z International Geophysical Year (IGY) z (actually, “year and a half”) 5 IGY Accomplishments z South Polar Stations established z Operation Deep Freeze z Discovery of mid-ocean submarine ridges z evidence of plate tectonics z USSR and USA pledged to launch artificial satellites (“man-made moons”) z discovery of Van Allen radiation belts 1957: “First” Year of Space Age z Space Age arguably began in 1955 z President Eisenhower announced that USA would launch small unmanned earth-orbiting satellite as part of IGY z Project Vanguard 6 Our Story: z The battle to determine who would launch the first artificial satellite: z Werner von Braun of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • May 14, 2010 Vol
    May 14, 2010 Vol. 50, No. 10 Spaceport News John F. Kennedy Space Center - America’s gateway to the universe www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/snews/spnews_toc.html INSIDE . STS-132 payload has international flair Explorer School By Linda Herridge Symposium Spaceport News oeing’s STS-132 payload flow man- Bager, Eve Stavros, and NASA Mission Man- ager Robert Ashley, will be stationed on console in Fir- ing Room 2 of Kennedy’s Launch Control Center, Page 2 watching with anticipation as space shuttle Atlantis STS-130 crew soars into the sky from returns Launch Pad 39A. Stavros and Boeing’s Checkout Assembly and NASA/Gianni Woods Payload Processing Ser- Technicians prepare to lift the Russian-built Mini Research Module-1, or MRM-1, out of its transportation container in Kennedy’s vices, or CAPPS, team were Space Station Processing Facility for its move to the payload canister and transportation to Launch Pad 39A. instrumental in helping to prepare the Russian-built Processing Facility, about environmental testing at Stavros drew on previ- Mini Research Module-1, or five weeks before the sched- the launch pad. Boeing also ous international experi- MRM-1, and an Integrated uled launch, for transfer coordinated delivery and ence from her work on life Cargo Carrier for delivery to the launch pad and final setup of ground support sciences payloads for the orbiter integration activi- equipment at the launch pad European Space Agency in Page 3 to the International Space Station. ties,” Ashley said. “The for testing operations and the Netherlands. NASA alums According to Stavros, processing team met or beat served as the main inter- “Working with RSC lay foundation planning and coordination every schedule milestone face with the shuttle team Energia was an exercise in to process the two major despite the relatively small to ensure payload schedule payloads began more than a size of the NASA and Boe- compatibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Earth/Moon Cargo Delivery
    41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit AIAA 2005-4187 10 - 13 July 2005, Tucson, Arizona Direct Earth/Moon Cargo Delivery W. J.D. Escher * and T.K. Percy † Science Applications International Corporation, Huntsville, AL, 35806 ABSTRACT As the space exploration initiative matures, the fundamental need for effective and efficient heavy -cargo logi stical delivery means across space will become increasingly apparent. Accepting human lunar exploration as the initial step toward more ambitious missions to follow, early on it is evident that a number of different cargo -carrying vehicles will incremental ly operate across the mission profile, requiring several in -flight payload transfer operations. When later stages of long -duration exploration and lunar -base build -up are underway , a more effective logistical arm may be needed. A leading -candidate approach is the “direct delivery” of Earth -launched cargo to the Moon. Here, by way of example, a single large vehicle to be described is operated across the total mission profile with no intermediate cargo transfers. This two -stage system consists of a solid -rock et Boost Stage and a cryogenic liquid -rocket Space Stage. In addition to multi -ton discretionary payloads being so delivered, a comparably sized collateral payload arrives at the Moon: the Space Stage transporter itself. This landed stage would be speciall y designed to be highly useful, in various ways, to the aw aiting human exploration team s. It would be used d irectly, as a shelter, habitat, storage facility and , indirectly, as for pre -planned disassembly for materials of construction, power systems hardwa re, instrumentation equipment, and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbit Subject Site Met Cdt Edt Gmt Endeavour Fueling
    ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ NASA TELEVISION SCHEDULE STS-127 / ISS 2 J/A Kibo Experiment Logistics Module - Exposed Section/Exposed Facility REV A 7/11/09 ***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** Standard-Definition NASA TV satellite coordinates are available at: http://www1.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/digital.html. High -Definition NASA TV Channel #105 is broadcast at 720p @ 59.94 fps, carried on an MPEG-2 digital signal on satellite AMC-6, Transponder 17C, at 72 degrees west longitude, 4040 MHz, vertical polarization. A Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) - compliant Integrated Receiver Decoder (IRD) with modulation of QPSK/DBV, data rate of 36.86, symbol 26.665 and FEC 3/4 will be needed for reception. Mission Audio can be accessed at: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv. Clients actively participating in Standard-Definition on-orbit interviews, interactive press briefings and satellite interviews must use the LIMO Channel, accessed via satellite AMC-6, 72 degrees west longitude, transponder 5C, 3785.5 MHz, vertical polarization. A Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) - compliant Integrated Receiver Decoder (IRD) with modulation of QPSK/DBV, data rate of 6.00 and FEC 3/4 will be needed for reception. ALL TIMES SUBJECT TO CHANGE This TV schedule is available via the Internet. The
    [Show full text]
  • STS-132 Mission Summary
    NASA Mission Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 (202) 358-1100 STS-132 MISSION SUMMARY May 2010 SPACE SHUTTLE ATLANTIS Atlantis’ 12-day mission will deliver the Russian-built Mini Research Module-1 that will provide additional storage space and a new docking port for Russian Soyuz and Progress spacecraft. MRM-1, also known as Rassvet, which means dawn in Russian, will be permanently attached to the bottom port of the station’s Zarya module. MRM-1 will carry important hardware on its exterior including a radiator, airlock and a European robotic arm. Atlantis also will deliver addi- tional station hardware stored inside a cargo carrier. Three spacewalks are planned to stage spare components outside the station, including six spare batteries, a Ku-band antenna and spare parts for the Canadian Dextre robotic arm. Shuttle mission STS-132 is the final sched- uled flight for Atlantis . CREW Ken Ham Tony Antonelli (an-tuh-NEL-lee) Commander (Captain, U.S. Navy) Pilot (Commander, U.S. Navy) ● Veteran of one spaceflight, STS-124 pilot ● Veteran of one spaceflight, STS-119 pilot ● Age: 45, Born: Plainfield, N.J. ● Born: Detroit ● Married with two children ● Married with two children ● Logged 5,000+ hours in 40 different aircraft ● Logged 3,200+ hours in 41 different aircraft ● Call sign: Hock ● Interests include snow boarding and NASCAR Garrett Reisman (REESE-man) Michael Good Mission Specialist-1 Mission Specialist-2 (Col., U.S. Air Force, Ret.) ● Veteran flight engineer on Expedition 16 & 17 ● Veteran of one spaceflight, STS-125 ● Launched on STS-123; returned STS-124 ● Age: 47, Hometown: Broadview Heights, Ohio ● Age: 42, Hometown: Parsippany, N.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon 440 Document II-1 Document Title
    440 Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon Document II-1 Document Title: NASA, “ Minutes of Meeting of Research Steering Committee on Manned Space Flight,” 25–26 May 1959. Source: Folder 18675, NASA Historical Reference Collection, History Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC. Within less than a year after its creation, NASA began looking at follow-on programs to Project Mercury, the initial human spacefl ight effort. A Research Steering Committee on Manned Space Flight was created in spring 1959; it consisted of top-level representatives of all of the NASA fi eld centers and NASA Headquarters. Harry J. Goett from Ames, but soon to be head of the newly created Goddard Space Flight Center, was named chair of the committee. The fi rst meeting of the committee took place on 25 and 26 May 1959, in Washington. Those in attendance provided an overview of research and thinking related to human spacefl ight at various NASA centers, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and the High Speed Flight Station (HSFS) at Edwards Air Force Base. George Low, then in charge of human spacefl ight at NASA Headquarters, argued for making a lunar landing NASA’s long-term goal. He was backed up by engineer and designer Maxime Faget of the Space Task Group of the Langley Research Center and Bruce Lundin of the Lewis Research Center. After further discussion at its June meeting, the Committee agreed on the lunar landing objective, and by the end of the year a lunar landing was incorporated into NASA’s 10-year plan as the long-range objective of the agency’s human spacefl ight program.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-129 Stocking the Station PRESS KIT/November 2009
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-129 Stocking the Station www.nasa.gov www.nasa.gov PRESS KIT/November 2009 CONTENTS Section Page STS-129/ULF-3 MISSION OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 1 STS-129 TIMELINE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 9 MISSION PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 11 MISSION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 13 MISSION PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................. 15 STS-129 CREW ....................................................................................................................... 17 PAYLOAD OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 27 S-BAND ANTENNA SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (SASA) AND RADIO FREQUENCY GROUP (RFG) ..................... 29 EXPRESS LOGISTICS CARRIER 1 AND 2 ............................................................................................... 31 RENDEZVOUS & DOCKING ....................................................................................................... 47 UNDOCKING, SEPARATION, AND DEPARTURE ...................................................................................... 48 SPACEWALKS
    [Show full text]
  • + STS-115 Press
    STS-121 Press Kit CONTENTS Section Page STS-115 MISSION OVERVIEW: SPACE STATION ASSEMBLY RESUMES................................ 1 STS-115 TIMELINE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 10 MISSION PRIORITIES............................................................................................................. 12 LAUNCH AND LANDING ........................................................................................................... 14 LAUNCH............................................................................................................................................... 14 ABORT-TO-ORBIT (ATO)...................................................................................................................... 14 TRANSATLANTIC ABORT LANDING (TAL)............................................................................................. 14 RETURN-TO-LAUNCH-SITE (RTLS)....................................................................................................... 14 ABORT ONCE AROUND (AOA)............................................................................................................... 14 LANDING ............................................................................................................................................. 14 MISSION PROFILE................................................................................................................... 15 STS-115 ATLANTIS CREW .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STS-132 Press Kit Cover.Indd
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-132 Finishing Touches PRESS KIT/May 2010 www.nasa.gov CONTENTS Section Page STS-132/ULF4 MISSION OVERVIEW ...................................................................................... 1 STS-132 TIMELINE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 13 MISSION PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 17 MISSION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 19 MISSION PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................. 23 STS-132 CREW ....................................................................................................................... 25 PAYLOAD OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 33 INTEGRATED CARGO CARRIER VERTICAL LIGHT DEPLOY (ICC-VLD) ................................................... 33 MINI-RESEARCH MODULE-1................................................................................................................. 36 RENDEZVOUS & DOCKING ....................................................................................................... 39 UNDOCKING, SEPARATION AND DEPARTURE ....................................................................................... 40
    [Show full text]
  • Project Vanguard and Ike's “Space for Peace”
    NANZAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES Volume 42 (2020): 23-42 Project Vanguard and Ike’s “Space for Peace” TABUCHI Yumi ＊ Introduction On December 20, 2019, U.S. President Donald Trump founded the U.S. Space Force, the newest military branch since the creation of the U.S. Air Force in 1947. He was apparently responding to the rising threats from Russia and China, who are rumored to be developing their own space capabilities. Three decades after the error of Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, Star Wars is now a distinct possibility. The formation of the Space Force symbolized a departure from a principle the United States had upheld for decades―that space should be free from all weapons and open to all nations. This principle, commonly called “space for peace,” now seems to be falling into oblivion.1 This article traces the origins of “space for peace” to Dwight D. Eisenhower’s presidency. In February 1955, the Technological Capabilities Panel (TCP) at the Science Advisory Committee (SAC) submitted a report, which proclaimed that “a satellite would constitute no active military offensive threat” and that “space, outside our atmosphere, is open to all [nations] (‘freedom of space’).”2 This ＊ Doctoral candidate at Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University [[email protected]]. I would like to express my gratitude to Associate Professor Kazushi Minami at Osaka University for always being a patient and supportive adviser, and the anonymous reviewers of the Nanzan Review of American Studies for their helpful comments. 1. “Space dominance” is now an important point of discussion regarding the Space Force.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-135: the Final Mission Dedicated to the Courageous Men and Women Who Have Devoted Their Lives to the Space Shuttle Program and the Pursuit of Space Exploration
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration STS-135: The Final Mission Dedicated to the courageous men and women who have devoted their lives to the Space Shuttle Program and the pursuit of space exploration PRESS KIT/JULY 2011 www.nasa.gov 2 011 2009 2008 2007 2003 2002 2001 1999 1998 1996 1994 1992 1991 1990 1989 STS-1: The First Mission 1985 1981 CONTENTS Section Page SPACE SHUTTLE HISTORY ...................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 SPACE SHUTTLE CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 2 THE SPACE SHUTTLE ERA BEGINS ....................................................................................................... 7 NASA REBOUNDS INTO SPACE ............................................................................................................ 14 FROM MIR TO THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION .......................................................................... 20 STATION ASSEMBLY COMPLETED AFTER COLUMBIA ........................................................................... 25 MISSION CONTROL ROSES EXPRESS THANKS, SUPPORT .................................................................... 30 SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM’S KEY STATISTICS (THRU STS-134) ........................................................ 32 THE ORBITER FLEET ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Spaceport News Summary
    2010 Spaceport News Summary The 2010 Spaceport News used the above banner for the year. The “Spaceport News” portion used a bolder look at the beginning of the year and finished the year with a less bold look. This feature is included on page 1 of some of the 2010 Spaceport News issues. Introduction The first issue of the Spaceport News was December 13, 1962. The 1963, 1964 and 1965 Spaceport News were issued weekly. The Spaceport News was issued every two weeks, starting July 7, 1966, until the last issue on February 24, 2014. Spaceport Magazine, a monthly issue, superseded the Spaceport News in April 2014, until the final issue, Jan./Feb. 2020. The two 1962 Spaceport News issues and the issues from 1996 until the final Spaceport Magazine issue, are available for viewing at this website. The Spaceport News issues from 1963 through 1995 are currently not available online. In this Summary, black font is original Spaceport News text, blue font is something I added or someone else/some other source provided, and purple font is a hot link. All links were working at the time I completed this Spaceport News Summary. The Spaceport News writer is acknowledged, if noted in the Spaceport News article. Starting with this Summary, the margins are left and right justified, more like a book. Page 1 From The January 8, 2010, Spaceport News On page 3, “South Florida undergraduates launch weather balloon, future”. Part of the article states “Sixteen undergraduate students, who might someday invent a sustainable lunar outpost or launch rockets and groundbreaking research satellites into space, participated in a five-day Space Florida Academy program at Kennedy on Dec.
    [Show full text]