DOCSLIB.ORG

BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas Sealed Corridor Study Wellington, Kansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas Sealed Corridor Study Wellington, Kansas FRONT COVER BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas Sealed Corridor Study Wellington, Kansas BNSF Railway July 2019 The purpose of the study was to assess the potential for a sealed corridor along the BNSF corridor within the City of Wellington. The sealed corridor project was conducted with the intent of eliminating all at-grade crossings within the city limits with a focus on grade separation concepts and crossing closures. Factors considered throughout the process included safety, traffic flow, multimodal accommodations, economic development, and quality of life in order to better address overall mobility. The study area encompassed the City of Wellington but also expanded beyond the existing city limits in order to evaluate potential growth areas. Therefore, the study area included 14 highway-rail crossings (7 grade-separated crossings and 7 at-grade crossings). BNSF Railway Jeremy Wegner, Manager Public Projects - Kansas Lynn Leibfried, Assistant Director Public Projects Paul Cristina, Director Public-Private Partnerships City of Wellington Shane Shields, City Manager Jeremy Jones, Public Works Director Jason Newberry, Assistant City Manager for Utilities TranSystems Corporation Jamie Hamm, PE, Client Liaison Deanne Winkelmann, AICP, Project Manager Sara Clark, PE, Senior Engineer Brent Shimanek, PE, Engineer Nathaniel Abeita, EIT, Engineer-in-Training BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas | Page i Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Process ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Document Review ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Crossing Review ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Community Input .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Crossing Screening and Concept Development ........................................................................ 7 Crossing Screening ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Concept Development ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Improvement Alternatives ......................................................................................................... 12 Improvement Scenarios ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Stakeholder Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Conclusion.................................................................................................................................... 14 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Next Steps .................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix A: Crossing Inventory Appendix B: Meeting Summary Appendix C: Crossing Screening Appendix D: Improvement Concepts BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas | Page ii Introduction Since 1993, BNSF Railway (BNSF) has invested in the Southern Transcontinental (Transcon) corridor, which connects the West Coast with major markets such as Dallas/Fort Worth, Kansas City, and Chicago. As one of the most heavily traveled rail lines in the western United States, freight train volume has steadily increased and is expected to continue growing. To address safety and operational needs, BNSF has expressed interest in creating sealed corridors through some communities along the Southern Transcon corridor. A sealed corridor aims to improve or consolidate each highway-rail grade crossing along a rail segment. Study Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the potential for a sealed corridor along the BNSF corridor within the City of Wellington. The sealed corridor study was conducted with the intent of eliminating all at-grade crossings within the city limits with a focus on grade separation concepts and crossing closures. Factors considered throughout the process included safety, traffic flow, multimodal accommodations, economic development, and quality of life in order to better address overall mobility. Study Area The study area encompassed the City of Wellington but also expanded beyond the existing city limits in order to evaluate potential growth areas. As outlined in Exhibit 1, the study area included 14 highway- rail crossings (7 grade-separated crossings and 7 at-grade crossings). The study area map is displayed in Exhibit 2. Two rail subdivisions converge in the City of Wellington. The east-west Panhandle subdivision and the north-south Emporia subdivision converge at the Wellington Yard. Both subdivisions are segments of the Southern Transcon corridor with nearly 60 trains per day. Study Process The report is organized into the following sections: . Existing Conditions: This section includes a document review, crossing inventory, and initial discussions with city stakeholders. The information provided a foundation for the study process and identified priorities that may influence improvements at each highway-rail crossing. Crossing Screening and Concept Development: This section includes an alternatives feasibility analysis to evaluate each highway-rail crossing in the study area for potential improvements. Then, a series of concepts were developed at key locations for consideration. Improvement Alternatives: This section includes a series of improvement scenarios for consideration by the city. Discussions with BNSF and city stakeholders are documented to determine next steps. BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas | Page 1 Exhibit 1A: Study Area - Emporia Subdivision U.S. DOT Crossing Warning Roadway ADT Street Name Number Type Device Classification 20th Avenue 009734G At-Grade Gates Rural Local 46 10th Avenue 009735N RR Under RR Over Rural Principal Arterial 4,170 Meridian Road 014169R RR Over RR Over Rural Local 85 Source: U.S. DOT Crossing Inventory, 2018 Exhibit 1B: Study Area - Panhandle Subdivision U.S. DOT Crossing Warning Roadway ADT Street Name Number Type Device Classification Fair Street 014171S RR Over RR Over Urban Local 1,145 Ash Street 014173F RR Over RR Over Urban Local 576 C Street 014174M At-Grade Gates Urban Local 245 Washington Avenue 014175U At-Grade Gates Urban Minor Arterial 575 Jefferson Avenue 014176B At-Grade Gates Urban Local 385 G Street 014180R At-Grade Gates Urban Local 50 H Street 014181X At-Grade Gates Urban Local 57 Highway 81 (US-81) 014184T RR Over RR Over Urban Principal Arterial 5,440 Lynn Burris Drive 014185A RR Over RR Over Urban Local 175 Crestview Road 014186G RR Over RR Over Urban Local 190 Tyler Road 014187N At-Grade Gates Rural Local 38 Source: U.S. DOT Crossing Inventory, 2018 BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas | Page 2 Exhibit 2: Study Area Source: TranSystems, 2018 BNSF Railway Sealed Corridor Study - Wellington, Kansas | Page 3 Existing Conditions In 1871, the City of Wellington was founded as an agricultural market near the Chisholm Trail. Development of the first railroad in 1878 accelerated the city’s growth as the Cowley, Sumner, and Fort Smith Railway Company extension began transporting agricultural goods to the Wichita area. Over the years, additional railroads were constructed as various companies began operation and/or consolidated. Today, BNSF operates the former Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad corridor that generally travels east-west through the city. A railyard is located in the southeast portion of the city. In addition, Union Pacific Railroad (UP) and shortline Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad also operate within the City of Wellington. Document Review Relevant reports were reviewed to establish a foundation for the study process and identify concepts that may influence improvements at each highway-rail crossing. In addition to Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and BNSF guidelines, the city documents reviewed included the Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program. A Quiet Zone Study was also conducted several years ago and was referenced during an initial conference call with city staff. Comprehensive Plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 128/Thursday, July 8, 2021/Notices
    36178 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices The TPSC prefers submissions in by entering the relevant docket number submitting written views, data, or Microsoft Word (.doc) or Adobe Acrobat in the search field on the home page. comments. FRA does not anticipate (.pdf) format. If the submission is in You can find general information about scheduling a public hearing in another file format, please indicate the the Office of the United States Trade connection with these proceedings since name of the software application in the Representative on its website: http:// the facts do not appear to warrant a ‘Type Comment’ field. File names www.ustr.gov. hearing. If any interested party desires should reflect the name of the person or an opportunity for oral comment and a Edward Gresser, entity submitting the comments. Please public hearing, they should notify FRA, do not attach separate cover letters to Chair of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, in writing, before the end of the electronic submissions; rather, include Office of the United States Trade Representative. comment period and specify the basis any information that might appear in a for their request. cover letter in the comments [FR Doc. 2021–14601 Filed 7–7–21; 8:45 am] All communications concerning these themselves. Similarly, to the extent BILLING CODE 3290–F1–P proceedings should identify the possible, please include any exhibits, appropriate docket number and may be annexes, or other attachments in the submitted by any of the following same file as the comment itself, rather DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION methods: than submitting them as separate files.
    [Show full text]
  • Trains 2019 Index
    INDEX TO VOLUME 79 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2018 and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 2019 – 862 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak's elephant style, Ask TRAINS, Mar 62 Aiken Railway: Amtrak’s lost transcons, Jul 22-31 Once upon a time: Seaboard and Southern, Apr 51 Amtrak’s money mystery, Jan 50-55 A tale of two South Carolina short lines, Apr 46-53 At fault: train or track? Passenger, Nov
    [Show full text]
  • SW 2Q21 Contents: President's Commentary Amtrak at 50: Jackson
    ISSN 2325-629X Amtrak 11 the Coast Starlight descends the Cuesta Grade and crosses the Stenner Creek Trestle, March 23, 2021. Photo by Chris Mohs. SW 2Q21 Contents: Orange County Capital Projects: Will the passengers return? President’s Commentary Brian Yanity Steve Roberts on Post Pandemic travel Amtrak at 50: Jackson Trip report: Simon Oh rides the Zephyr to Utah From the Rear Platform Super Chief Memory: Passings: Bruce Jenkins, Jim Mills James Smith Does Metrolink need Ventura County? STEEL WHEELS / SECOND QUARTER 2021 1 From the Editor’s Desk President’s By Paul Dyson - RailPAC President CommentaryBy Steve Roberts – Stimulus Fever RailPAC President The smell of money is in the air, even if these days one rarely handles a bill or a coin. It’s coming from the federal Happy New Year for the second government, seeking to catch up on years of delayed repairs time. With more and more and renewals of everything from sewer pipes on up. I support of the population vaccinated, this in principle, with these understandings. There will not be it seems like we are turning as much money as we would like. There will be some tough the page to a new chapter. The economy also appears to elbowing and shoving among stakeholders vying for funds be rebounding helped by lower infection levels, stimulus for their pet project. Unfortunately, there will be some money payments and more leisure/hospitality businesses partially spent unproductively, at least in our view, by those with the reopening. Thanks to additional funding and a mandate strongest elbows. from Congress, the long-distance trains are returning to daily RailPAC has always prided itself on demanding value for service.
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Invests Across Its Regions to Expand Capacity and Maintain Vast Network Company Will Spend More Than $100 Million Per State in Nearly Half Its Network
    Contact: Amy Casas FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 817-867-6139 [email protected] BNSF Invests Across its Regions to Expand Capacity and Maintain Vast Network Company will spend more than $100 million per state in nearly half its network FORT WORTH, TEXAS, January 15, 2015 – BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) today announced more details about the major capital projects it plans to complete in 2015 to maintain and grow its rail network. In BNSF’s North Region, the company will invest approximately $1.5 billion across eight states for engineering maintenance and line expansion projects, of which approximately $700 million* is planned for projects to expand the rail lines and Positive Train Control (PTC) in that region. BNSF’s North Region has experienced the most rapid growth in recent years. It is the corridor used to move agriculture and coal to export facilities in the Pacific Northwest, petroleum products produced in the region that are destined for refinery facilities, and for consumer products shipped to and from marine ports in the Pacific Northwest. The North Region is also a destination point for materials that support the production of crude oil in the Bakken shale formation. In BNSF’s South Region, the railroad plans to spend approximately $800 million in nine states for engineering maintenance and line expansion projects, of which $175 million is planned for line expansion initiatives and continued implementation of PTC. The South Region includes BNSF’s high-speed transcontinental route with more than 2,000 miles of double track that allows customers to move freight from West Coast marine ports to interchange facilities in Chicago as well as major rail terminals in Kansas City, Fort Worth, Denver and St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California
    The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California Brian Yanity Californians for Electric Rail [email protected] May 13, 2018 Executive Summary Full electrification of freight trains is the only proven zero-emissions freight railroad technology. Electric rail propulsion can take several different forms, including locomotives powered by overhead catenary wire, on-board batteries, or more advanced concepts such as battery tender cars and linear synchronous motors. This white paper is largely a literature review of previous studies on electric freight rail in the Southern California region, with information compiled about existing electric freight rail locomotives and systems from around the world. The two main benefits of freight rail electrification in the region would be reduced air pollution, and reduced consumption of diesel fuel for transportation. Electrification of freight rail in Southern California would reduce the public health impacts to local communities affected by diesel-powered freight transportation, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of freight movement. The main challenge for electric freight rail is the high capital costs of electric rail infrastructure, especially the overhead catenary wire over tracks. A variety of options for public and/or private financing of freight rail electrification need to be explored. Electrification of the proposed short-haul rail service between the ports and the Inland Empire, currently under study, is an opportunity for using electric locomotives though the Alameda
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Railway & New Mexico
    BNSF Railway & New Mexico Ean Johnson REGIONAL MANAGER, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAY 10, 2018 Industry & BNSF Overview 2 Types of Railroads Class I • There are 7 Class I freight railroads • Operate in 44 states • Accounts for 90% of employees • 69% of U.S. freight rail mileage Class II and III (Short Line and Regional Railroads) • +500 short line and regional railroads • Operate in every U.S. state except Hawaii. • Accounts for 10% of employees • 31% of U.S. freight rail mileage 3 Source: Prepared by AAR from the National Transportation Atlas Database 2010, published by the U.S. DOT/BTS BNSF is a Freight Rail Industry Leader • 32,500 route miles in 28 states and 3 Canadian provinces • 41,000 employees • Operates average of 1,400 trains per day • Serves more than 40 ports and 25 intermodal facilities • 10.3 million carloads shipped in 2017 4 BNSF Weekly Volume Through Dec 30, BNSF 220 averaged 197K units per 210 week, up 5.5% y/y. 200 190 180 170 Thousands 160 2015 2016 150 2017 140 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 Weeks Source: Association of American Railroads5 BNSF Volume – Full Year 2017 Total units and % change from 2016 In Thousands Agricultural Products 1,108 -0.2% 1,917 2017 Coal TOTAL VOLUME +6.3% 10,277 +5.3% 5,439 Consumer Products +6.3% 1,813 Industrial Products +5.0% 6 BNSF’s Volume Growth Leads Rail Industry Rail Volume Growth Percent Volume Change y/y Through December 30, 2017 5.5% BNSF Railway 2.6% U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Aerodynamic Efficiency of Intermodal Train Loading Using Machine Vision
    Monitoring the Aerodynamic Efficiency of Intermodal Train Loading Using Machine Vision TRB 11-2236 Submitted for publication in the proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting 15 November 2010 Tristan G. Rickett1, 3, John M. Hart2, J. Riley Edwards1, Avinash Kumar2, Christopher P.L. Barkan1 and Narendra Ahuja2 1 Railroad Engineering Program Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana IL, 61801 USA Fax: (217) 333-1924 2 Computer Vision and Robotics Laboratory Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 405 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801 USA Abstract (244 words) + Body (5,226 words) + 7 Figures = 7,220 Total Words Tristan G. Rickett John M. Hart J. Riley Edwards (217) 244-6063 (217) 244-4174 (217) 244-7417 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Avinash Kumar Christopher P.L. Barkan Narendra Ahuja (217) 244-4292 (217) 244-6338 (217) 333-1837 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3 Corresponding author TRB 2011 Annual Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. Rickett et al. 11-2236 1 ABSTRACT Intermodal freight generates one of the highest sources of revenue among all traffic types transported by North American railroads. Intermodal trains, however, use equipment that is not aerodynamically efficient compared to other types of rolling stock, and typically operate at higher speeds, creating significant aerodynamic drag. This high resistance associated with the movement of intermodal trains results in significant annual operating expenses in the form of fuel expenditures.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Edward R. Hamberger President
    STATEMENT OF EDWARD R. HAMBERGER PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE AND TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE ON SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AND MERCHANT MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND SECURITY HEARING ON NATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR EFFICIENT FREIGHT MOVEMENT JUNE 10, 2008 Association of American Railroads 50 F Street NW Washington, DC 20001 202-639-2100 Introduction On behalf of the members of the Association of American Railroads (AAR), thank you for the opportunity to discuss strategies for efficient freight movement. AAR members account for 75 percent of U.S. freight railroad mileage operated, 92 percent of employees, and 95 percent of revenue. Comprehensive, reliable, and cost-effective freight railroad service is critical to our nation. Today, freight railroads account for more than 40 percent of U.S. intercity ton-miles — more than any other mode of transportation — and serve nearly every industrial, wholesale, retail, agricultural, and mineral-based sector of our economy. And in the words of the former Railways Adviser at the World Bank, “Because of a market-based approach involving minimal government intervention, today’s U.S. freight railroads add up to a network that, comparing the total cost to shippers and taxpayers, gives the world’s most cost-effective rail freight service.” Looking ahead, the United States cannot prosper in an increasingly-competitive global marketplace if our freight is not delivered efficiently and cost effectively. Having adequate freight rail capacity is critical to this effort. Freight railroads must be able to both maintain their extensive existing infrastructure and equipment and build the substantial new capacity that will be required to transport the significant additional traffic our economy will generate.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Malaysian Toll Road Public-Private Partnership Program
    Challenges and Opportunities in Implementation of Future California Rail Network The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Levy, Samuel, A. Awadagin Faulkner, and Joseph M. Sussman. “Challenges and Opportunities in Implementation of Future California Rail Network.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2546 (2016): 69–77. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2546-09 Publisher Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Version Original manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110652 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ESD Working Paper Series Challenges and Opportunities in Implementation of the Future California Rail Network Samuel Levy Joseph M. Sussman Co-President, MIT Transportation Club JR East Professor of Civil and Master of Science, Transportation Environmental Engineering and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Class of 2015 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA Cambridge, MA Email: samlevyalum.mit.edu Email: sussmanmit.edu A. Awadagin Faulkner B.S. in Civil Engineering Candidate Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA Email: afaulknermit.edu Submitted to the 95th TRB Annual Meeting ESD-WP-2015-10 August 2015 esd.mit.edu/wps 1 TRB 16-4398 2 3 Challenges and Opportunities in Implementation of the Future California Rail Network 4 5 Submitted to the 95th TRB Annual Meeting by: 6 7 Samuel Levy (Corresponding Author) 8 M.S. in Transportation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 9 Current affiliation (at the time of publication): Analyst, Hawaiian Airlines 10 Email: [email protected] 11 12 A.
    [Show full text]
  • PATHWAYS and POLICY for 21ST CENTURY FREIGHT RAIL by Marc Scribner
    PATHWAYS AND POLICY FOR 21ST CENTURY FREIGHT RAIL by Marc Scribner September 2021 Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists, and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition, and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer- reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge, and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. PATHWAYS AND POLICY FOR 21ST CENTURY FREIGHT RAIL i TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 PART 2 TODAY’S FREIGHT RAIL INDUSTRY AND TOMORROW’S COMPETITION ........................
    [Show full text]
  • DRAINAGE PLANS Beeobecftuncil WOMAN SUFFRAGE DEFEATED^-TWO OTHER Auffindments ALSO LOSE in SUMMIT ^ ™ (FORTNIGHTLY CLUB OPENS
    YEAR. FRIDAY AFTERNOON. jOCTOBER 22. 1915. •-. SUO PER YEAR. FIBST SCBSCUIPTION CONCERT. DRAINAGE PLANS It is with great pride and satisfac- WOMAN SUFFRAGE DEFEATED^-TWO To B« Sobjert ^nl Sanml™ t MrtfcWHt (FORTNIGHTLY CLUB tion that the committee in charge of the Subscription Concerts announces Churth Dinner. BEEOBECftUNCIL that tho first concert ot this, the OTHER AUffiNDMENTS ALSO LOSE IN SUMMIT A church dinner Is to be held^ next [ OPENS SEASON 1 seventh season will bo given by Os- Thursday evening in the Parish iloas« J sip Gabrilowitch, master pianist, in Summit defeated tho Woman's Suf- women worked in relays taking turm the Beechwood Hall on November 16. of tho Summit Metbodt5t-Epi5copal!L(IIIC||gon [ Many Items of Smaller Busi< daring different hours." • T This Is a Monday evening and the at- frage Amendment on Tuesday by: a church, arrangea by the Men's Bible I State Offi- vote of 755 to 333, giving.a majority As Tuesday was the last registrar ness Disposed of After Dis- tention ot the subscribers Is called to tlon-day for_the General Election ot Study Club and the Women's.SocIeUes • cers as Guests, the First" that fact as the concerts have usually of 422.: • • : been given on Tuesday evenings. - It November 2, as well as for tho special ot the. churlch,-ReVih"ffin. I. Harcn. cussing Drainage Con-' has been the ambition of the commit-' The second amendment, providing electfon, there was a very fair regis- Event—ActiveProgfani for.more frequent'amendments to the tration list complotcd^—The- total_ D.D., Will be the toast masterl The I tee to change tho concert nights to principal speaker will be Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Rail Locomotive Roster 5954 Current As of October 2018
    LEGACY OF QUALITY TODAY Herzog is one of the country’s largest & most respected private rail and heavy/highway construction organizations in the industry Herzog Technologies, Inc. 2011 becomes the newest member of the Herzog family 2004 Herzog Caribbean, Ltd. is formed and construction begins in the Turks & Caicos Islands Herzog Transit Services, Inc. 1993 is formed 1992 Herzog Services, Inc. is formed & Ultrasonic Rail Testing begins Herzog serves as the prime 1979 FRQWUDFWRURQLWVȨUVWWUDQVLWMRE 1978 Herzog Railroad Services, Inc. stakes its claim in the MOW services business Herzog expands into the railroad 1972 construction & rehabilitation business Herzog Contracting is founded 1969 by Bill Herzog as an asphalt paving contractor Contact us for more information! www.herzog.com Meet a locomotive dealer, rebuilder, and broker p. 44 www.TrainsMag.com • January 2019 Going AWOL for steam p. 56 Oregon hot spot p . 60 Snowplow action! Fighting snow through the years p. 68 Amtrak’s money mystery Long distance vs. corridor trains p. 50 Ogden: Forgotten genius of the transcontinental railroad p. 28 No. 1 in a series: The other transcons, Great Northern p. 36 BONUS PLUS ONLINE Farewell to New Haven’s classic look p. 24 CONTENT CODE PG. 5 Hunter Harrison’s ultimate revenge p. 16 SMARTER RAIL STARTS HERE Always Innovating to Bring Your Rail Operations Into the Future www.wi-tronix.com 631 E Boughton Rd #240 +1 888 WITRONIX [email protected] Bolingbrook, IL 60440 FROM THE EDITOR Welcome to 2019 and our new look Jim Wrinn This is a special year in railroad history, and we’ve got [email protected] @TrainsMagazine great stories, photos, and video to enrich your experience @trains_magazine between a guide to a short line and a hot spot TWO DVDS FOR 150 YEARS you should know.
    [Show full text]