Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam Msc and Allister Vale MD
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD November 2017 CONTENTS General Toxicology 11 Metals 50 Management 24 Pesticides 52 Drugs 27 Chemical Warfare 54 Chemical Incidents & 40 Plants 55 Pollution Chemicals 40 Animals 56 CURRENT AWARENESS PAPERS OF THE MONTH Rethinking mercury: the role of selenium in the pathophysiology of mercury toxicity Spiller HA. Clin Toxicol 2017; online early: doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1400555: Introduction There is increasing evidence that the pathophysiological target of mercury is in fact selenium, rather than the covalent binding of mercury to sulfur in the body's ubiquitous sulfhydryl groups. The role of selenium in mercury poisoning is multifaceted, bidirectional, and central to understanding the target organ toxicity of mercury. Methods An initial search was performed using Medline/PubMed, Toxline, Google Scholar, and Google for published work on mercury and selenium. These searches yielded 2018 citations. Publications that did not evaluate selenium status or evaluated environmental status (e.g., lake or ocean sediment) were excluded, leaving approximately 500 citations. This initial selection was scrutinized carefully and 117 of the most relevant and representative references were selected for use in this review. Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units. The NPIS is commissioned by Public Health England 2 Binding of mercury to thiol/sulfhydryl groups Mercury has a lower affinity for thiol groups and higher affinity for selenium containing groups by several orders of magnitude, allowing for binding in a multifaceted way. The established binding of mercury to thiol moieties appears to primarily involve the transport across membranes, tissue distribution, and enhanced excretion, but does not explain the oxidative stress, calcium dyshomeostasis, or specific organ injury seen with mercury. Effects of mercury on selenium and the role this plays in the pathophysiology of mercury toxicity Mercury impairs control of intracellular redox homeostasis with subsequent increased intracellular oxidative stress. Recent work has provided convincing evidence that the primary cellular targets are the selenoproteins of the thioredoxin system (thioredoxin reductase 1 and thioredoxin reductase 2) and the glutathione-glutaredoxin system (glutathione peroxidase). Mercury binds to the selenium site on these proteins and permanently inhibits their function, disrupting the intracellular redox environment. A number of other important possible target selenoproteins have been identified, including selenoprotein P, K, and T. Impairment of the thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems allows for proliferation intracellular reactive oxygen species which leads to glutamate excitosis, calcium dyshomeostasis, mitochondrial injury/loss, lipid peroxidation, impairment of protein repair, and apoptosis. Methylmercury is a more potent inhibitor of the thioredoxin system, partially explaining its increased neurotoxicity. A second important mechanism is due to the high affinity of mercury for selenium and the subsequent depletion of selenium stores needed for insertion into de novo generation of replacement selenoproteins. This mercury-induced selenium deficiency state inhibits regeneration of the selenoproteins to restore the cellular redox environment. The effects of selenium on mercury and the role this plays in biological response to mercury Early research suggested selenium may provide a protective role in mercury poisoning, and with limitations this is true. The roles selenium plays in this reduction of mercury toxicity partially depends on the form of mercury and may be multifaceted including: 1) facilitating demethylation of organic mercury to inorganic mercury; 2) redistribution of mercury to less sensitive target organs; 3) binding to inorganic mercury and forming an insoluble, stable and inert Hg:Se complex; 4) reduction of mercury absorption from the GI tract; 5) repletion of selenium stores (reverse selenium deficiency); and 6) restoration of target selenoprotein activity and restoring the intracellular redox environment. There is conflicting evidence as to whether selenium increases or hinders mercury elimination, but increased mercury elimination does not appear to be a major role of selenium. Selenium supplementation has been shown to restore selenoprotein function and reduce the toxicity of mercury, with several significant limitations including: the form of mercury (methylmercury toxicity is less responsive to amelioration) and mercury dose. Conclusions The interaction with selenium is a central feature in mercury toxicity. This interaction is complex depending on a number of features such as the form of mercury, the form of selenium, the organ and dose. The previously suggested "protective effect" of selenium against mercury toxicity may in fact be backwards. The effect of mercury is to produce a selenium deficiency state and a direct inhibition of selenium's role in controlling the intracellular redox environment in organisms. Selenium supplementation, with limitations, may have a beneficial role in restoring adequate selenium status from the deficiency state and mitigating the toxicity of mercury. Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2017.1400555 3 The safety of high-dose insulin euglycaemia therapy in toxin- induced cardiac toxicity Page CB, Ryan NM, Isbister GK. Clin Toxicol 2017; online early: doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1391391: Context High-dose insulin euglycaemia (HIE) is recommended in the management of toxin-induced cardiac toxicity, with increasing insulin doses now being used. We aimed to investigate the safety of HIE in toxin-induced cardiac toxicity. Methods This was a retrospective review of cases from two clinical toxicology units. Demographics, toxin(s) ingested, clinical effects, investigations (serum glucose, electrolytes), treatments (insulin, glucose, electrolyte replacement), length of stay (LOS) and outcomes were extracted from the patients' medical records. Associations between insulin and glucose/electrolyte homeostasis were explored by comparing insulin administration and glucose or electrolyte concentrations and replacement. Results There were 22 patients (12 females), median age 57 years (15–88 years) treated with HIE. There were 12 beta-blocker, six calcium channel blocker and three combined beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker ingestions. A total of 19 patients had a systolic blood pressure <80mmHg and 18 patients required inotropes in addition to HIE. There were three deaths. Despite glucose and electrolyte replacement, 16 patients (73%) developed hypoglycaemia (Reference range [RR] <3.5 mmol/L or <63 mg/dl). In 7 patients, hypoglycaemia was mild (2.5–3.4 mmol/L or 45–62 mg/dl) and in nine was severe (<2.5 mmol/L or <45 mg/dl). There were no neurological effects from hypoglycaemia. A total of 18 patients (82%) developed hypokalaemia (<3.5 mEq/L). In 16 patients, this was mild (2.5-3.4 mEq/L). There were no cardiac arrhythmias associated with this hypokalaemia.There was no apparent association between insulin dosing and severity of hypoglycaemia or hypokalaemia, or in glucose or potassium replacement. Median insulin loading dose was 80U (range 50–125 U) and the median maximum insulin infusion rate was 150 U/h (range 38–1500 U/h). Median glucose infusions rates were 37.5g/h (range 4–75g/h). There was no apparent association between insulin and glucose administration. Glucose was administered for a median of 18h after ceasing insulin. The duration of glucose administration after ceasing insulin increased with the rate and total insulin administered during HIE. Discussion Despite the benefits of HIE in toxin-induced cardiac toxicity, it caused significant disruption to glucose and electrolyte homeostasis, although there were no apparent complications from this. There was no association by comparing the amount of insulin administered on adverse effects or glucose administered, suggesting higher doses of insulin are associated with no more adverse effects. Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2017.1391391 4 Reductions in emergency department visits after primary healthcare use of the UK National Poisons Information Service Elamin MEMO, James DA, Holmes P, Jackson G, Thompson JP, Sandilands EA, Bradberry S, Thomas SHL. Clin Toxicol 2017; online early: doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1390120: Background Suspected poisoning is a common cause of hospital admission internationally. In the United Kingdom, the National Poisons Information Service (NPIS), a network of four poisons units, provides specialist advice to health professionals on the management of poisoning by telephone and via its online poisoning information and management database, TOXBASE®. Objective To demonstrate the impact of NPIS telephone advice and TOXBASE® guidance on poisoning- related referrals to emergency departments (ED) from primary healthcare settings. Methods A telephone survey of primary healthcare providers calling the NPIS and an online survey of TOXBASE® primary care users were conducted to evaluate the effect of these services on poisoning-related ED referrals. Enquirers were asked to indicate whether referral was needed before and after using these information sources. Results The number of cases considered by enquirers