DOCSLIB.ORG

Arachnologische Arachnology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arachnologische Arachnology Arachnologische Gesellschaft E u Arachnology 2015 o 24.-28.8.2015 Brno, p Czech Republic e www.european-arachnology.org a n Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters Heft / Volume 51 Karlsruhe, April 2016 ISSN 1018-4171 (Druck), 2199-7233 (Online) www.AraGes.de/aramit Arachnologische Mitteilungen veröffentlichen Arbeiten zur Faunistik, Ökologie und Taxonomie von Spinnentieren (außer Acari). Publi- ziert werden Artikel in Deutsch oder Englisch nach Begutachtung, online und gedruckt. Mitgliedschaft in der Arachnologischen Gesellschaft beinhaltet den Bezug der Hefte. Autoren zahlen keine Druckgebühren. Inhalte werden unter der freien internationalen Lizenz Creative Commons 4.0 veröffentlicht. Arachnology Logo: P. Jäger, K. Rehbinder Letters Publiziert von / Published by is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal focusing on faunistics, ecology Arachnologische and taxonomy of Arachnida (excl. Acari). German and English manuscripts are equally welcome. Members Gesellschaft e.V. of Arachnologische Gesellschaft receive the printed issues. There are no page charges. URL: http://www.AraGes.de Arachnology Letters is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autorenhinweise / Author guidelines www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Schriftleitung / Editors Theo Blick, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M. and Callistus, Gemeinschaft für Zoologische & Ökologische Untersuchungen, D-95503 Hummeltal; E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sascha Buchholz, Institut für Ökologie, Technische Universität Berlin, Rothenburgstr. 12, D-12165 Berlin; E-Mail: [email protected] Gast-Editor / Guest editor Stano Pekár, Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic; E-Mail: [email protected] Redaktion / Editorial staff Theo Blick, Frankfurt/M., Sascha Buchholz, Berlin Jason Dunlop, Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin; E-Mail: [email protected] Ambros Hänggi, Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Augustinergasse 2, CH-4001 Basel; E-Mail: [email protected] Hubert Höfer & Stefan Scharf (Satz und Repro), Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Erbprinzenstr. 13, D-76133 Karlsruhe; E-Mail: [email protected] Wissenschaftlicher Beirat / Editorial Board Elisabeth Bauchhenß, Wien (Austria), private researcher; Peter Bliss, Halle an der Saale (Germany), Martin-Luther-University; Maria Chatzaki, Alexandroupoli (Greece), Democritus University of Thrace; Petr Dolejš, Praha (Czech Republic), Museum for Natural History; Martin Entling, Landau/Pfalz (Germany), University Koblenz-Landau; Oliver-David Finch, Rastede (Germany), Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz/Aurich; Izabela Hajdamowicz, Siedlce (Poland), Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities; Peter J. van Helsdingen, Leiden (Netherlands), Naturalis Biodiversity Centre; Marco Isaia, Torino (Italy), Università di Torino; Peter Jäger, Frankfurt am Main (Germany), Senckenberg Research Institute; Alberto Jiménez-Valverde, Málaga (Spain), Alcalá University; Christian Komposch, Graz (Austria), Oekoteam, Institute for Animal Ecology and Landscape Planning; Boris Leroy, Paris (France), Université de Paris-Sud; Volker Mahnert, Douvaine (France), private researcher; Jochen Martens, Mainz (Germany), Johannes Gutenberg-University; Dieter Martin, Waren (Germany), private researcher; Tone Novak, Maribor (Slovenia), University; Uwe Riecken, Bonn (Germany), German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation; Ferenc Samu, Budapest (Hungary), Hungarian Academy of Sciences Bestellungen / Order from Peter Michalik, Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Greifswald J.-S.-Bach-Str. 11/12, D-17489 Greifswald Tel.: +49-(0)3834-864099; E-Mail: [email protected] oder / or http://www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 51: 1-91, i-xvi Karlsruhe, April 2016 Arachnologische Mitteilungen 51: i-iii Karlsruhe, April 2016 Preface to the Proceedings of the 29th European Congress of Arachnology, Brno, 2015 August 24-28 At the 28th European Congress in Torino I was approached by the society president, Wolfgang Nentwig, with the ques- tion whether I could organise the next congress because the society had not received an invitation for 2015. I was sur- prised and astonished at the same time by his request and had to think for a couple of days about it. I have to admit that I was planning to organise a congress in a near future. But 2015 was very near – only 11 months to go. After checking out the possibilities I decided to make it. Before this congress there have been two international arachnology meetings organised in the Czech Republic over an approximately 20-year period. In 1971 there was the 5th International Congress of Arachnology in Brno; and in 1994 there was the 15th European Colloquium of Arachnology in České Budějovice. The congress was attended by 169 participants and ac- I assembled a team composed of three co-organisers (Vla- companying persons from 36 countries across the globe, with dimír Hula, Jana Niedobová, Yuri Marusik), two secretaries a dominance of local (Czech) arachnologists (23 %), followed (Ivana Tarabová and Hana Bezděková from the TA-Service), by Germans and Slovenians. The programme had a traditi- the photographer (Radek Šich), English editor (L. Brian Pa- onal structure: scientific sessions were held over four days, trick), editor of publications (Šárka Mašová) and a number followed by a social programme in the evening. One excep- of helpers (Guadalupe Corcobado, Lucie Havlová, Ondřej tion was the Arachnological Games (we played the Kubb in Košulič, Eva Líznarová, Radek Michalko, Ondřej Michá- teams) followed by a barbeque at the Starobrno restaurant. In lek, Lenka Sentenská, Zdeněk Škopek). A couple of other comparison with the previous congresses the ESA assembly members of the Czech Arachnological Society gave a helpful was held on Thursday. The main task of the assembly was to hand (Petr Dolejš, Martin Forman, Pavel Just, Tomáš Krejčí, approve new by-laws of the society. Ondřej Macháč). The scientific programme included 13 sessions. Although The 29th European Congress of Arachnology was joint- there was a proposal for two symposia prior to the congress ly organised by the Masaryk University, Czech Arachnolo- – one for ‘Ecosystem services and adaptation’ and ‘Diversifi- gical Society and Mendel University. It began on Saturday cation of spider silks: how and why do new silk phenotypes morning with an intensive two-day workshop on IUCN Red evolve?’ – none was eventually organised (due to low inte- Listing – concepts and tools, led by Pedro Cardoso. There rest in the topics). The largest sessions were on Behavioural were about 10 participants from all over the world. The other ecology, Ecology and Cytogenetics of arachnids. Altogether workshop announced, Experimental design and modern data there were 61 oral communications and 75 posters. The ses- analysis, was cancelled due to insufficient interest. Most of the sions were arranged to avoid parallel sessions. Beside sessi- participants, however, turned up on Sunday afternoon. They ons, there were four plenary talks, at the beginning of each were greeted by a young blond (cardboard) lady, who became of four days of talks. Wim Damen from the Jena University a regular participant over the week. in Germany, opened the congress with his talk on how genes During the Opening Ceremony the honorary committee control segmentation during ontogenetic development in a member, Jan Buchar, gave a short commemorative speech on theridiid spider. Gabriele Uhl from the University of Greifs- the congress from 1971; sadly 3 months later Jan passed away wald in Germany spoke about various facets of mating be- (see the obituary in this volume). Then Vlastimil Růžička haviour in the cannibalistic spider, Argiope bruennichi. Jordi reminded us the atmosphere of the České Budějovice collo- Moya-Laraňo from the Experimental Station of Arid Zones quium. And finally, Peter Dvořák, the vice-rector of Masaryk in Spain presented a simulation program on eco-evolutionary University, spoke about the university. dynamics in complex food webs. Finally, on the very last day Brno is the city of Johann Gregor Mendel, the father of a Jonathan Pruitt from the University of Pittsburgh in the US, modern genetics. In 2015 we were commemorating 150 ye- presented results on the personality of spiders. ars since he gave a lecture about the results of breeding ex- On Wednesday there were the mid-congress excursions. periments at the meeting of the Natural History Society in Participants could choose to take one of three trips. Luckily, Brno. And therefore the main emphasis of the congress was the weather was nice. One was a collecting trip in the Pav- on Mendel’s legacy: the first plenary lecture was on develop- lovské vrchy Hills protected area and nearby areas which are mental genetics (by Wim Damen), there was a major sessi- located south of Brno. Participants could see some rare arth- on on arachnid cytogenetics, the Opening Party was at the ropods, including spiders on dry grasslands. At the end of the Mendel museum and the logo of the congress was inspired trip they visited Křivé jezero Nature Reserve, a water meadow by Mendel’s discovery of the genotypic ratio (1:2:1) for he- between two rivers. The largest group of participants
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Bradley Evan Carlson, Ph.D
    Curriculum Vitae Bradley Evan Carlson, Ph.D. Byron K. Trippet Assistant Professor of Biology Wabash College Crawfordsville, IN 47933 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (765) 361-6460 Website: carlsonecolab.weebly.com Professional Experience 2014 - present Byron K. Trippet Assistant Professor of Biology, Wabash College Education 2009-2014 PhD in Ecology, minor in Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Advisor: Dr. Tracy Langkilde Dissertation: The evolutionary ecology of intraspecific trait variation in larval amphibians 2008 B.S. in Biology, Bethel University, St. Paul, MN Summa cum laude, Honors Graduate Thesis: Temperature and desiccation effects on the antipredator behavior of Centruroides vittatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) Research Interests Evolutionary ecology – phenotypic diversity, local adaptation, trait integration Behavioral ecology – phenotypic plasticity, predator-prey interactions, personality traits Community ecology – trait-mediated indirect interactions, predation, aquatic ecology Zoology – herpetology, arachnology, comparative morphology Publications (*co-author was undergraduate) Kashon*, EAF, and BE Carlson. 2018. Consistently bolder turtles maintain higher body temperatures in the field but may experience greater predation risk. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72:9. Carlson, BE, and T Langkilde. 2017. Body size variation in aquatic consumers causes pervasive community effects, independent of mean body size. Ecology and Evolution 7:9978-9990. Lambert, MR, Carlson, BE, Smylie, MS, and L Swierk. 2017. Ontogeny of sexual dichromatism in the explosively breeding Wood Frog. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 12:447-456. Media coverage: InsideEcology.com (https://insideecology.com/2018/02/12/amphibians-that-change-colour/) Carlson, BE, and T Langkilde. 2016. The role of resources in microgeographic variation in Red- spotted Newt (Notophthalmus v. viridescens) morphology. Journal of Herpetology 50:442-448.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Records from Colin-Cornwall Lakes Wildland Provincial Park
    SPIDER RECORDS FROM COLIN-CORNWALL LAKES WILDLAND PROVINCIAL PARK Larinioides cornutus Thanatus coloradensis (Photo by D. Buckle) (Photo by D. Buckle) Prepared by Wayne Nordstrom1 and Don Buckle2 March 2004 1Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre Parks and Protected Areas Division Alberta Community Development 2 620 Albert Avenue Saskatoon, SK S7N 1G7 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 2. The Study Site.............................................................................................................................. 1 3. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Survey Dates....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Collection of Spiders .......................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Identification of Spiders ..................................................................................................... 4 4. Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................ 4 5. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................11 6. Acknowlegements........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
    Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Reproductive Traits Between Two Salt-Marsh Wolf Spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) Under Different Habitat Suitability Conditions
    Animal Biology 61 (2011) 127–138 brill.nl/ab Comparison of reproductive traits between two salt-marsh wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) under different habitat suitability conditions Charlène Puzin1, Anthony Acou2, Dries Bonte3 and Julien Pétillon4,∗ 1 Université de Rennes 1, U.R.U. 420 – Biodiversité et Gestion des territoires, U.F.R. SVE, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, CS 74205, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France 2 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, U.M.R. 7208 BOREA – Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Station Marine de Dinard, BP 70134, 38 rue du Port Blanc, 35800 Dinard, France 3 Ghent University, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4 University of Antwerp, Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium Abstract Salt-marsh invasions by the grass Elymus athericus (Poaceae) recently transformed usual areas dom- inated by Atriplex portulacoides (Chenopodiaceae) into homogeneous meadows. Two wolf spider species, Pardosa purbeckensis and Arctosa fulvolineata, show contrasting densities and habitat prefer- ences in salt marshes (respectively dominant and co-dominant ground-living spiders) and oppositely respond to the grass invasion. This allowed us to test whether invasive species that alter habitat struc- ture affect reproduction in addition to previously recorded changes in density. Reproductive traits (female mass, cocoon mass, number and volume of eggs, hatched cocoon as a proxy of reproduc- tion date) were studied in both invaded and natural salt marshes during 2007 and 2008 in the Mont St-Michel Bay (France). In both species, reproductive outputs (cocoon mass) were higher in optimal habitats and volume of eggs was found to be independent from female mass, whereas the latter sig- nificantly influenced the number of eggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Community Composition of Arboreal Spiders: the Relative Importance of Habitat Structure
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Juraj Halaj for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology presented on May 6, 1996. Title: Abundance and Community Composition of Arboreal Spiders: The Relative Importance of Habitat Structure. Prey Availability and Competition. Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy _ John D. Lattin, Darrell W. Ross This work examined the importance of structural complexity of habitat, availability of prey, and competition with ants as factors influencing the abundance and community composition of arboreal spiders in western Oregon. In 1993, I compared the spider communities of several host-tree species which have different branch structure. I also assessed the importance of several habitat variables as predictors of spider abundance and diversity on and among individual tree species. The greatest abundance and species richness of spiders per 1-m-long branch tips were found on structurally more complex tree species, including Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco and noble fir, Abies procera Rehder. Spider densities, species richness and diversity positively correlated with the amount of foliage, branch twigs and prey densities on individual tree species. The amount of branch twigs alone explained almost 70% of the variation in the total spider abundance across five tree species. In 1994, I experimentally tested the importance of needle density and branching complexity of Douglas-fir branches on the abundance and community structure of spiders and their potential prey organisms. This was accomplished by either removing needles, by thinning branches or by tying branches. Tying branches resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of spiders and their prey. Densities of spiders and their prey were reduced by removal of needles and thinning.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasures of the Krkonoše Tundra
    Treasures of The KrKonoše Tundra Podpořeno grantem z Islandu, Lichtenštejnska a Norska. Supported by grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Terminological Dictionary a plant or animal species which originated and only occurs in endemic a specific, geographically defined area; outside of this area it does species not naturally occur a plant or animal species which has survived in a locality since the glacial relict ice ages Hercynides, a geologically ancient, non-limestone, mountain range in central Hercynian and western Europe (Massif Central, Vosges, Schwarzwald, Harz, mountain Šumava, Bayerischer Wald, Krušné hory Mountains and the High range Sudetes) large animals which lived on Earth at the end of the last ice age (e.g. cave bear, cave lion, woolly rhinoceros, woolly mammoth, megafauna spotted hyena); most of these animals died out during the warming in the Holocene dwarf pine scrub with rare plant community on the subarctic ridge peatbogs in Krkonoše cloudberry the individual layers of snow on the slope are moving at different speeds, which causes pressure and on the bodies of plants, creeping snow especially on the branches and trunks of woody plants, which become deformed; various unusually shaped forms of woody plants occur in this way e.g. on avalanche runs (crooked forests) green plant capable of photosynthesis, but extracting water and semi-parasite mineral nutrients from its host plant Life Corcontica supports improved management of the most valuable montane project meadows in Krkonoše and selected plant and animal
    [Show full text]
  • Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: on the Occasion of His 60Th Birthday
    Zootaxa 5006 (1): 006–012 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Biography ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5006.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B883A8B0-F324-400F-B670-304511C53963 Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: On the occasion of his 60th Birthday YURI M. MARUSIK1 & VICTOR FET2 1Institute for Biological Problems of the North, Portovaya Street 18, Magadan 685000, Russia Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-5148 2Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-600X Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov was born on 29 July 1961 in Moscow, Russia. Both of his parents, Gleb K. Mikhailov (1929–2021) and Galina R. Mikhailova (1926–2019), were research scientists. Kirill’s father was an expert in the history of mechanics, and mother, a biologist. Since early childhood Kirill was raised mainly by his maternal grandparents, Ro- man P. Nosov and Antonina V. Nosova. Kirill’s grandfather, a CPSU official and a career administrator at the Ministry of Energetics, retired from his post in 1965 to take care of the grandson. Kirill’s grandmother, an obstetrician by profession, received disability at a military plant during the WWII in evacuation, and was a housewife after the war. In 1978, Kirill began his studies at the Division of Biology (Biologicheskii Fakul’tet) of the Moscow State University (below, MSU). Even earlier, as a schoolboy, Kirill used to buy books on zoology, especially separate issues of the Fauna of the USSR and Keys to the Fauna of the USSR, then relatively cheap and available.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Three Poorly Known Arctosa Species from China (Araneae: Lycosidae)
    Zootaxa 3404: 53–68 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Notes on three poorly known Arctosa species from China (Araneae: Lycosidae) LU-YU WANG1, YURI M. MARUSIK2,3 & ZHI-SHENG ZHANG1,4 1Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China 2Institute for Biological Problems of the North of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Portovaya Str. 18, 685000 Magadan, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Three species of the genus Arctosa are revised and their relationship with A. cinerea, the type species of the genus, is dis- cussed. Arctosa binalis Yu & Song, 1988 is a junior synonym of A. depectinata (Bösenberg & Strand, 1906). Males of Arctosa gougu Chen & Song, 1999 and Arctosa vaginalis Yu & Song, 1988 are described for the first time. All specimens examined were collected from the Yunnan Province, China. Morphological illustrations, photos, descriptions and SEM photographs of the male bulbus of all species are given. Stridulatory files on chelicerae in Lycosidae are reported for the first time. Key words: Taxonomy, wolf spiders, morphology, redescription, distribution Introduction The wolf spider genus Arctosa C.L. Koch, 1847 with 171 species (Platnick 2012), is one of the largest genera of Lycosidae. The genus has been relatively well revised in Europe (Lugetti & Tongiorgi 1965), the Nearctic (Dondale and Redner 1983) and Japan (Tanaka 2009). In this genus, 78 species are known from only one sex (16 from males and 62 from females).
    [Show full text]
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]