The Social Environment and Indigenous Student Success in a Canadian Post-Secondary Institution
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Indigenous and Tribal People's Rights Over Their Ancestral Lands
INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09 30 December 2009 Original: Spanish INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES Norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter‐American Human Rights System 2010 Internet: http://www.cidh.org E‐mail: [email protected] OAS Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data Derechos de los pueblos indígenas y tribales sobre sus tierras ancestrales y recursos naturales: Normas y jurisprudencia del sistema interamericano de derechos humanos = Indigenous and tribal people’s rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources: Norms and jurisprudence of the Inter‐American human rights system / [Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights.] p. ; cm. (OEA documentos oficiales ; OEA/Ser.L)(OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978‐0‐8270‐5580‐3 1. Human rights‐‐America. 2. Indigenous peoples‐‐Civil rights‐‐America. 3. Indigenous peoples‐‐Land tenure‐‐America. 4. Indigenous peoples‐‐Legal status, laws, etc.‐‐America. 5. Natural resources‐‐Law and legislation‐‐America. I. Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. II Series. III. Series. OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.56/09 Document published thanks to the financial support of Denmark and Spain Positions herein expressed are those of the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights and do not reflect the views of Denmark or Spain Approved by the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights on December 30, 2009 INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS MEMBERS Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero Víctor E. Abramovich Felipe González Sir Clare Kamau Roberts Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Florentín Meléndez Paolo G. Carozza ****** Executive Secretary: Santiago A. -
Editor's Note: Indigenous Communities and COVID-19
Volume 4, Issue 1 (October 2015) Volume 9, Issue 3 (2020) http://w w w.hawaii.edu/sswork/jisd https://ucalgary.ca/journals/jisd http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/ E-ISSN 2164-9170 handle/10125/37602 pp. 1-3 E-ISSN 2164-9170 pp. 1-15 Editor’s Note: Indigenous Communities and COVID-19: Impact and Implications R eaching Harmony Across Indigenous and Mainstream Peter Mataira ReHawaiisear cPacifich Co nUniversitytexts: A Collegen Em eofr gHealthent N andar rSocietyative CaPaulatherin eMorelli E. Burn ette TuUniversitylane U niver sofity Hawai‘i at Mānoa Michael S. Spencer ShUniversityanondora B ioflli oWashingtont Wa shington University i n St. Louis As the editors we honor those who have contributed to this special issue, Indigenous CommunitiesKey Words and COVID-19: Impact and Implications. In this time of great uncertainty and unrest Indigenous r esearch • power • decolonizing research • critical theory we felt compelled to seek a call for papers that would examine aspects of our traditional cultures focusedAbstra specificallyct on COVID-19 and its disruptions to the dimensions of our wellbeing and the Research with indigenous communities is one of the few areas of research restoration of wellness. This virus has impacted every individual and family on this planet, and, has encompassing profound controversies, complexities, ethical responsibilities, and helpedhistor iccoalesceal contex tthe of pervasiveexploitat ion intersectional and harm. O fstrugglesten this c oofm pIndigenouslexity becom ePeopless . overwhTheelmi narticlesgly appa rselectedent to th eare ea rcompellingly career resea inrch theirer wh oability endeav toors castto m lightake over the shadows of discord meaningful contributions to decolonizing research. Decolonizing research has the andca pairaci tofy t oconspiracy be a cat alyst fsurroundingor the improve dthis wel lpandemic.being and po sTheyitive so acknowledgecial change amon thatg the grief and anguish buried beneathindigen otheus csoilomm ofun intergenerationalities and beyond. -
Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) in the Light of Cultural Pluralism in Europe by Triin Lingiene Tartu 2017 (Inter)Cultural Dilemma in Europe
Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) in the light of cultural pluralism in Europe By Triin Lingiene Tartu 2017 (Inter)cultural dilemma in Europe • 28 Member States • over 510 million people (2016) • around 150 native languages • so called ‘third culture kids’ (second and third generation immigrants) Diversity – an asset or a barrier? European initiatives • The European Language Intercultural dialogue • The common European framework of reference for language (CEF) • Portfolio • Focus on ICC development alongside linguistic skills – a priority Problems with teaching ICC • Shortage of suitable resources • Lack of more specific guidance for teachers • Training has been inadequate • Focus on knowledge rather than behaviour • ICC gets little consideration in national curricula Culture Culture is the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from other. Culture is like an ‘onion’ that consists of invisible layers – the values that lie in the very core, and visible layers – the identities that manifest in rituals, heroes and symbols. (Hofstede, 2001) The Bennett scale 1. Denial 2. Defence 3. Minimization 4. Acceptance 5. Adaptation 6. Integration (Bennett & Bennett, 2004) The Model of ICC • Knowledge • Skills of interpreting and relating • Skills of discovery and interaction • Attitudes • Critical cultural awareness and political education (Byram, 1997) Foreign language barrier • between people of different languages in different countries, where one is a native speaker of the language used • between people of different languages but in the same country, where one is a native speaker of the language used • between people of different languages in different countries, where the language used is a lingua franca (Byram, 1997) Power struggle • Those who master grammar and idiom have a potential advantage over foreign speakers and non-standard native speakers. -
Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala
Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala 1 Introduction I Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Indigenous and Conflicts Mining in Guatemala Peoples Author: Joris van de Sandt September 2009 This report has been commissioned by the Amsterdam University Law Faculty and financed by Cordaid, The Hague. Academic supervision by Prof. André J. Hoekema ([email protected]) Guatemala Country Report prepared for the study: Environmental degradation, natural resources and violent conflict in indigenous habitats in Kalimantan-Indonesia, Bayaka-Central African Republic and San Marcos-Guatemala Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to all those who gave me the possibility to complete this study. Most of all, I am indebted to the people and communities of the Altiplano Occidental, especially those of Sipacapa and San Miguel Ixtahuacán, for their courtesy and trusting me with their experiences. In particular I should mention: Manuel Ambrocio; Francisco Bámaca; Margarita Bamaca; Crisanta Fernández; Rubén Feliciano; Andrés García (Alcaldía Indígena de Totonicapán); Padre Erik Gruloos; Ciriaco Juárez; Javier de León; Aníbal López; Aniceto López; Rolando López; Santiago López; Susana López; Gustavo Mérida; Isabel Mérida; Lázaro Pérez; Marcos Pérez; Antonio Tema; Delfino Tema; Juan Tema; Mario Tema; and Timoteo Velásquez. Also, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the team of COPAE and the Pastoral Social of the Diocese of San Marcos for introducing me to the theme and their work. I especially thank: Marco Vinicio López; Roberto Marani; Udiel Miranda; Fausto Valiente; Sander Otten; Johanna van Strien; and Ruth Tánchez, for their help and friendship. I am also thankful to Msg. Álvaro Ramazzini. -
Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development PROTECTING AND PROMOTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE: SYSTEMS, NATIONAL EXPERIENCES AND INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS Sophia Twarog and Promila Kapoor, Editors UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2004 i Note Symbols of the United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is re- quested, together with a reference to the document number. A copy of the publication contain- ing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat (c/o Administrative Secretary, Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland). Cover photo by Jean Philippe Soule courtesy of www.nativeplanet.org UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Symbol No. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/10 ISSN: 1812-7061 Copyright © United Nations, 2004 All rights reserved ii Foreword The preservation, protection and promotion of the traditional knowledge, innovations and prac- tices of local and indigenous communities (TK) is of key importance for developing countries. Their rich endowment of TK and biodiversity plays a critical role in their health care, food security, culture, religion, identity, environment, sustainable development and trade. -
Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: a Settler Harm Reduction Ap
TOWARDS IMPLEMENTING THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION’S CALLS TO ACTION IN LAW SCHOOLS: A SETTLER HARM REDUCTION APPROACH TO RACIAL STEREOTYPING AND PREJUDICE AGAINST INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS IN CANADIAN LEGAL EDUCATION SCOTT J. FRANKS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO August 2020 © Scott J. Franks, 2020 Abstract Many Canadian law schools are in the process of implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Call to Actions #28 and #50. Promising initiatives include mandatory courses, Indigenous cultural competency, and Indigenous law intensives. However, processes of social categorization and racialization subordinate Indigenous peoples and their legal orders in Canadian legal education. These processes present a barrier to the implementation of the Calls. To ethically and respectfully implement these Calls, faculty and administration must reduce racial stereotyping and prejudice against Indigenous peoples and Indigenous legal orders in legal education. I propose that social psychology on racial prejudice and stereotyping may offer non- Indigenous faculty and administration a familiar framework to reduce the harm caused by settler beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors to Indigenous students, professors, and staff, and to Indigenous legal orders. Although social psychology may offer a starting point for settler harm reduction, its application must remain critically oriented towards decolonization. ii Acknowledgments I have a lot of people to acknowledge. This thesis is very much a statement of who I am right now and how that sense of self has been shaped by others. -
Non-Territorial Autonomy in Theory and Practice: a 2020 Report
Non-Territorial Autonomy in Theory and Practice: A 2020 Report Non-Territorial Autonomy in Theory and Practice: A 2020 Report Edited by: Marina Andeva Skopje, 2020 ENTAN – The European Non-Territorial Autonomy Network www.entan.org Non-Territorial Autonomy in Theory and Practice: A 2020 Report Edited by: Marina Andeva © 2020 University American College Skopje (UACS) This is an open-access and free-of-charge publication that can be distributed for non-commercial purposes provided that attribution to the authors is observed. This publication is based upon work from COST Action “ENTAN – The European Non-Territorial Autonomy Network”, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a funding agency for research and innovation networks. Our Actions help connect research initiatives across Europe and enable scientists to grow their ideas by sharing them with their peers. This boosts their research, career and innovation. www.cost.eu CONTENTS 1. 7 3. 27 5. 45 Introduction NTA - Legal and NTA and Economic Political Arrangements and Regional Development 2. 11 4. 37 6. 55 Non-Territorial NTA and the Promotion NTA: A Autonomy - The Time of Cultural Identities Bibliographical Has Come Database CONTENTS 6.1. 59 NTA Bibliography – History History: Case studies History: Theoretical 113 123 Approach 7. 9. Research projects Conclusions focusing on non-territorial 6.2. autonomy 127 65 NTA Bibliography – About the Contemporary theory contributors 6.3. 81 NTA Bibliography – Contemporary case studies 8. 117 University courses focusing on minority rights and non- territorial autonomy Introduction1. -
Proefschrift König 1..346
Moving Experience Complexities of Acculturation Bewogen ervaring De complexiteiten van acculturatie (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit voor Humanistiek te Utrecht op gezag van de Rector, prof. dr. H.A. Alma, ingevolge het besluit van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op 23 mei 2012 des voormiddags te 10.30 uur door Jutta Renate König Geboren op 25 juli 1955, te Washington DC (USA) Promotores prof. dr. Harry Kunneman, Universiteit voor Humanistiek prof. dr. Halleh Ghorashi, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Beoordelingscommissie prof. dr. Hans Alma, Universiteit voor Humanistiek prof. dr. Rosi Braidotti, Universiteit Utrecht prof. dr. Christien Brinkgreve, Universiteit Utrecht prof. dr. Ruben Gowricharn, Universiteit Tilburg prof. dr. Hubert Hermans, emeritus hoogleraar Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Moving Experience Complexities of Acculturation Jutta König VU University Press, Amsterdam VU University Press De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV Amsterdam The Netherlands [email protected] www.vuuitgeverij.nl © 2012 by Jutta König, Loosdrecht Design cover: Margriet Kaathoven, Amsterdam Type setting: JAPES, Amsterdam (Jaap Prummel) ISBN 978 90 8659 606 5 NUR 740, 770 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the publisher. Table of contents Acknowledgements 1 -
Teacher Education Access & Choices Handbook
Teacher I : 6 8 = Education Access & Choices Handbook LINKING ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES WITH TEACHER PROGRAMS AND POST-SECONDARY OPPORTUNITIES ' % % - TEACH: Table of Contents Thinking about a Career in Teaching? T E A C H: Teacher Education Access & Choices Handbook .........................................................2 About Teaching: Interviews with Aboriginal Educators .....................................................................4 BC College of Teachers ..................................................................................................................8 Developmental Standard Term Certificate .....................................................................................10 First Nations Schools Association .................................................................................................12 Indigenous Adult and Higher Learning Association ......................................................................14 Post-Secondary Institutes and Teacher Education Programs Thompson Rivers University ..........................................................................................................16 University of British Columbia (NITEP) ...........................................................................................18 Malaspina University-College / Vancouver Island University ...........................................................20 University of the Fraser Valley .......................................................................................................22 University -
Table of Contents
Post-Secondary Education Gathering October 15, 2018 Pinnacle Hotel Harbourfront Table of Contents Document Description Page Tab 1: WELCOME AND REVIEW OF DRAFT AGENDA 1.0 Draft Agenda 1 Tab 2: PARTNERSHIPS 2.0 Aboriginal Post-Secondary Education and Training Memorandum of Understanding 2 2.1 ABCDE-FNESC-IAHLA Memorandum of Understanding 3 2.2 AEST-FNESC/IAHLA Protocol Agreement 5 Tab 3: CONTEXT Summary of United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 3.0 Articles and Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action related to Post-Secondary 12 Education and Training Aboriginal Post-Secondary Education and Training Policy Framework 2020 Vision 3.1 15 for the Future 3.2 BC First Nations PSE Student Data Summary 56 Tab 4: BC PSE MODEL CONSIDERATIONS 4.0 Graphic BC-Specific PSE Funding Model 59 Tab 5: BC CONTEXT Honourable Minister Melanie Mark (Advanced Education, Skills and Training) 5.0 60 Mandate Letter 5.1 Honourable Minister Rob Fleming (Education) Mandate Letter 63 Draft Principles that Guide the Province of BC’s Relationship with Indigenous 5.2 66 Peoples Letter to First Nations Leadership Council Members from Honourable Minister 5.3 74 Scott Fraser RE: Endorsement of Commitment Document Aboriginal Student Data Report: “Aboriginal Learners in British Columbia’s Public 5.4 77 Post-Secondary System” Tab 6: NATIONAL CONTEXT 6.0 Honourable Minister Jane Philpott (Indigenous Services Canada) Mandate Letter 129 Honourable Minister Carolyn Bennett (Crown-Indigenous Relations Canada) 6.1 134 Mandate Letter Principles Respecting the -
Who Are Indigenous Peoples?
The Rights of Indigenous Peoples: What you need to know. UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) is a comprehensive international human rights document on the rights of indigenous peoples. It sets out the UN minimum standards for the survival, dignity, wellbeing, and rights of the world’s indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples, including Its 46 articles cover all areas of Mâori, were involved in drafting it. human rights as they apply to The Declaration reflects existing indigenous peoples. Key themes are: international human rights • self-determination standards and explains how these apply in the specific circumstances of • equality and non-discrimination DR indigenous peoples. The New Zealand • participation, underpinned by government announced its support free, prior, informed consent for the Declaration in April 2010 • culture at the United Nations. IP? • land, territories, and resources. What are the UNDRIP’s aims? The Declaration aims to “enhance harmonious and cooperative relations between the State and indigenous peoples, based on principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith”. Who are indigenous peoples? Around the world, indigenous Some of the features and peoples may be known by names experiences common to indigenous such as: tangata whenua, aboriginal, peoples around the world are: first nations, ‘native’ or ‘tribal’ • self-definition as indigenous and peoples. Mâori are the indigenous distinctly different from other people of Aotearoa New Zealand. groups within a state It is up to indigenous peoples • special attachment to and use of themselves to decide whether they their traditional land consider themselves to be indigenous (self-identification). -
Modulerev- Intro to Interf Dia, Session 5
SESSION 5: Crossing Cultures Changes Us Session: This session offers an extended reflection on what participants are noticing about changes in themselves and introduces ways to assess the readiness for partnership in a group. OUTLINE OF SCHEDULE: 05 min: Gathering Prayer 10 min: Homework Processing 20 min: Presentation and Conversation: Life Is Startling and Disappointing 15 min: Presentation and Reflection: Your New Identity and Four Assumptions 20 min: Presentation: The Bennett Scale 15 min: Analysis 05 min: Assignment and Closing Prayer COPIES THAT NEED TO BE MADE: 1 copy per participant: Gathering Prayer (1 pg) Assumptions of the Developmental Model Of Intercultural Sensitivity (1 pg) Bennett Scale (1 pg) Intercultural Conflict Styles (1 pg) Who Are These People? (1 pg) Assignment and Closing Prayer (1 pg) “On Being Viewed as Strange” (1 pg—duplex on back of Assignment) 1 INSTRUCTOR’S CONTENT 05 min: Gathering Prayer: Reflection by Rev. Dr. Howard Thurman LEADER: The concern which I lay bare before God today is my need to be better: I want to be better than I am in my most ordinary day-by-day contacts: ALL: With my friends— With my family— With my casual contacts— With my business relations— With my associates in work and play. LEADER: I will read these slowly and pause after each phrase, take time to reflect on whether there are things you want to let go of in relation to each category. After each pair I will invite you to make the response with, “We pray…” I want to be better than I am in the responsibilities that are mine: I am conscious of many petty resentments.