Opposing Views Attachment #2

Opposing Views Attachment #2 The Following Compelling, Indisputable Science Authored by Experts Reveals Post-Fire Logging will Inflict Major, Tragic Damage to the Natural Resources in and Downstream from ANY Burned Landscape … Especially Wildlife and Aquatic Resources. Fire that does not threaten homes in the Wildland Urban Interface is a welcome event rather than a “catastrophe” used by the USFS to describe such a fire. Dead and dying trees resulting from wildfire are supposed to rot and decay in order to replenish the organic material in the soil. Dead and dying trees resulting from wildfire provide unique wildlife habitat available only after a fire. Human manipulation destroys these benefits. Indeed, there is a reason fire comes from the sky during the hottest, least humid time of the year. The experts’ statements below are clear and to the point. USFS employees are taught by the agency that post-fire logging is necessary to maintain the lumber value before the trees deteriorate. If forest ecosystem health is the goal the trees would be left on-site rather than removed to provide corporate profit opportunities. A few USFS specialists understand this … yet they choose to play the game to avoid jeopardizing their jobs. A real professional would know what to do and not to do. After reading the information below any intelligent, caring person who is paid by the public to protect and preserve the national forests 1 owned by 324 million Americans would demand to be disassociated with any and all post-fire timber sales. Its as simple as that. ----------------------------- Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt - ““You couldn’t have asked for a better fire,” Hutto said, and as an ecologist he was serious. He drove on past the sign and into what he calls “nature’s best-kept secret,” a young burned forest.” “But many fire ecologists have long had an alternate perspective on large, severe fires like Rice Ridge: that they are inevitable and largely unstoppable, like a hurricane. Far from destroying forests, these fires touch off a frenzy of ecological activity—a tumult of new plants, mushrooms, insects, amphibians, birds, and mammals—that’s unlike anything that happens in the quiet shade of a green forest.” Old Flames: The Tangled History of Forest Fires, Wildlife and People By Hugh Powell Published online by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, June 17, 2019 https://www.allaboutbirds.org/old-flames-the-tangled-history-of-forest-fires-wildlife-and- people/?utm_source=Cornell%20Lab%20eNews&utm_campaign=3243b2af77- Living_Bird_Summer_2019_TOC&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_47588b5758- 3243b2af77-308471973 ----------------------------- Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt - “Burned forests are not dead zones, but rather teem with life. The reflex reaction to log after forest fires directly contradicts decades of scientific research showing both the immense ecological importance of post- fire landscapes and the significant harm that can occur when such areas are logged. Forest fires like the Rim fire are essential to maintain biological diversity in the Sierra’s ecosystems, and burned and dead trees provide critical habitat to numerous wildlife species.” (pg 2) Nourished by Wildfire By the Center for Biological Diversity and the John Muir Project • January 2014 http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/birds/black- backed_woodpecker/pdfs/Nourished_by_Wildfire.pdf ----------------------------- 2 Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt - “It is reported in the scientific literature that fire enhances nutrient cycling, improves the digestibility of forage/browse, increases the crude protein content of forage/browse and increases the long-term biomass production of forage and browse. Fire improves nutrition which leads to sustainable and resilient wildlife populations. In BC you can’t have robust wildlife populations without fire. One study in northern BC reported that Stone’s Sheep that have access to significant portions of burned habitat had higher lamb to ewe ratios and lower incidence of lungworm than herds that did not have access to burned habitat.” “Fire suppression and post-fire salvage logging have negative implications for the species yet BC has not identified this woodpecker as a species of concern to be considered in how much of a burned forest should be logged. However, over the next few years in the United States, the potential listing of the black-backed woodpecker may lead to federal legal challenges when lumber companies plan to clearcut forests burned by wildfires.” Salvage Logging British Columbia’s Wildfires – Will Wildlife Conservation and Science Matter? By Mark LR Hall Published by HC Hunter Conservationist, September 14, 2017 http://hunterconservationist.ca/salvage-logging-british-columbias-wildfires-will-wildlife- conservation-and-science-matter/ ----------------------------- Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt - “The science over the past two decades has been clear: salvage logging is risky for our natural systems and delays or even prevents ecosystem recovery. Fire salvage logging increases soil compaction, increases erosion and losses of organic matter (with effects on both plants and streams) and decreases the landscape water-holding capacity, potentially leading to larger floods and increased surface run off. The less logging after a fire, the better for our natural ecosystems.” “In fire-dependent ecosystems like much of the Kootenays, fires rejuvenate important wildlife habitat for elk, deer and bighorn sheep. Fires at mid and high elevations create ideal conditions for huckleberries, an important food for bears and many other species.” SALVAGE LOGGING AFTER THE FIRES: ECOSYSTEMS IN DANGER Aired by BCTV news, September 26, 2017 http://bctvkootenays.com/2017/09/26/salvage-logging-ecosystems-in-danger/ ----------------------------- 3 Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt - “The science over the past two decades has been clear: salvage logging is risky for our natural systems and delays or even prevents ecosystem recovery. Fire salvage logging increases soil compaction, increases erosion and losses of organic matter (with effects on both plants and streams) and decreases the landscape water-holding capacity, potentially leading to larger floods and increased surface run off. The less logging after a fire, the better for our natural ecosystems.” “Our native plant communities have evolved to regenerate after fires. Standing dead trees continue to provide cover and habitat for wildlife, shade for regrowth of plant communities and help keep streams cool for our native fish. Green tree patches left after fires skip across the landscape, are not just important as wildlife habitat, but also as seed sources and for the complexity of the rejuvenating landscape.” FIRE SALVAGE LOGGING: OUR ECOSYSTEMS IN DANGER By John Bergenske Posted in Conservation, October 3, 2017 http://wildsight.ca/blog/2017/10/03/fire-salvage-logging-our-ecosystems-in-danger/ ----------------------------- Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt - “WASHINGTON— The Forest Service is proposing to log 661 million board feet of timber in the area burned by the Rim fire last summer in California’s Stanislaus National Forest. The new proposal, issued as part of a draft environmental impact statement, would sell almost four times the timber volume sold by the Forest Service in the entire state of California in 2013. It would ignore longstanding rules protecting old-growth trees and destroy habitat for roughly 60 percent of imperiled black-backed woodpeckers. “This timber sale will be incredibly destructive,” said Randi Spivak of the Center for Biological Diversity. “The logging will hurt watersheds and wildlife and even increase the risk of unnatural fires by spreading invasive species. It’s little more than an excuse to cut old trees in forests that would otherwise be protected.” Decades of science have shown the importance of preserving burned areas for wildlife like black-backed woodpeckers and the function of these complex ecosystems,” Spivak said. “Throwing that away to make the timber industry happy is shortsighted.” “ “By the Forest Service’s own admission, its proposal would harm rare wildlife. Post-fire species like rare black-backed woodpeckers depend on intensely burned forests to nest and forage for food such as insects that initiate nature’s recycling of the burned trees. The shrubs and plants that begin to grow also provide food and cover for an abundance of birds and pollinators; they provide nutrients like nitrogen to the soil for the regrowing 4 forests. The Forest Service’s proposed action would destroy the homes of about 60 percent of black-backed woodpecker families.” Forest Service Proposes Massive Salvage Logging Project in Rim Fire Area Published by the Center for Biological Diversity, May 19, 2014 http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2014/rim-fire-logging-05-19-2014.html ----------------------------- Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View Excerpt –" “A burned area may be the most ecologically sensitive place for logging, said Dr. Richard Hutto, professor and director of the Avian Science Center at the University of Montana. “We talk about forest restoration after a fire, but it just got restored by fire itself,” he said. “That’s what fire does.” “ Scientists: Salvage logging following a forest fire hinders recovery, restoration Published by Cyberwest, March 26, 2006 http://cyberwest.com/post-forest-fire-salvage-logging/ ----------------------------- Post Wildfire Logging Opposing View

Load more