Real Umd 0117E 16550.Pdf (1.315Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Real Umd 0117E 16550.Pdf (1.315Mb) ABSTRACT Title of Document: OUT OF THE PAST: PUBLIC POLICIES, POLITICAL PRESSURES, AND AMERICAN FILM PRESERVATION Brian Real, Doctorate of Philosophy in Information Studies, 2015 Directed By: Professor John Carlo Bertot, College of Information Studies Professor Paul T. Jaeger, College of Information Studies This dissertation analyzes the federal government’s support for motion picture preservation, beginning with the founding of the American Film Institute (AFI) as a federally funded, nonprofit organization in 1967 and continuing through various government actions to support film preservation through the 1990s. The nature of this support, funding or otherwise, has varied greatly over the past decades, being informed by contemporary contexts and the perceived needs of the United States government. From the founding of cinema through the middle of the 1930s, most films were considered expendable within several years after their release. This changed in the United States when the Museum of Modern Art began collecting motion pictures. The federal government began supporting the activities of this institution and other film archives soon after and into the following years. Federal support for film preservation was generally sporadic, with the government often ceasing funding when its perceived needs were met, until the founding of the AFI. At this point, film preservation became an ongoing concern of the federal government, and it has remained so since. Beyond the AFI, landmark moments for film preservation have included the National Film Preservation Acts of 1988, 1992, and 1996 and the founding of the National Film Preservation Foundation in 1996. This study used a holistic approach, considering how various stakeholders have influenced or been influenced by the federal government’s actions regarding film preservation. Such stakeholders include film preservationists and archivists, businesses that produced or own the rights to films, the creative talent that makes movies, media scholars, and the general public. This analysis provides a history that will be of interest to practitioners in the field of motion picture preservation and it will help them to understand how to navigate the competing interests that influence their profession. OUT OF THE PAST: PUBLIC POLICIES, POLITICAL PRESSURES, AND AMERICAN FILM PRESERVATION By Brian Real Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy 2015 Advisory Committee: Professor John Carlo Bertot, Chair Professor Paul T. Jaeger, Co-Chair Oliver Gaycken, PhD Ricardo Punzalan, PhD Elizabeth A. Papazian, PhD © Copyright by Brian Real 2015 Acknowledgements This dissertation could not have been completed without the considerable support of numerous individuals over the past decade. My interest in film preservation began for two key reasons. First, my work for the Calvert Library, a public library system in southern Maryland, introduced me to librarianship and generated my interest in other information institutions such as archives. The years 2006 through 2010 were perhaps the most important for my personal and professional develop, due to the high level of support I was given for my work during these years. The fact that I am not thanking anyone personally for my time at Calvert Library is a result of there being too many individuals deserving of recognition. Second, although I previously had an interest in film studies and silent cinema, I was introduced the concepts underlying film preservation when I attended Le Giornate del Cinema Muto – also known as the Pordenone Silent Film Festival – after receiving funding to be part of its annual “Collegium” of students, young scholars, and young professionals in 2007 and 2008. I met some of my closest friends in the film studies and film archives fields at this festival, at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto in Bologna, and at various academic conference throughout the United States in the ensuing years. All of these individuals have contributed to this work in some way, but I am particularly grateful for the help and support of James Layton, Laurel Howard, Daniel Wiegand, Jelena Rakin, Andreas Thein, Ashley Blewer, and Travis Wagner. The staff of Library Media Services at the University of Maryland provided me with invaluable training in media librarianship, as well as ongoing moral support over the years following my departure from this library. I am grateful to Allan Rough, ii Carleton Jackson, Linda Sarigol, Ying Guo, and Fernando Jimenez for sharing their knowledge with me. Elizabeth Papazian and Caroline Eades deserve special recognition for bringing me into the film studies working group at the University of Maryland and giving me an opportunity to contribute to the creation of the university’s film studies program and the promotion of cinema culture on campus. Both offered a level of trust in my abilities and ongoing guidance that allowed me to create an impact on the University of Maryland of which I am particularly proud. Liz, in particular, has provided feedback over the years that has made me a better scholar and contributed significantly to shaping this dissertation through her service on my committee. I am grateful for the support and collegiality of faculty members Valerie Anishchenkova, Jonathan Auerbach, Hester Baer, Peter Beicken, Oliver Gaycken, Saverio Giovacchini, Judith Hallett, Regina Harrison, Jason Kuo, Michele Mason, Zita Nunes, Valerie Orlando, Orrin Wang, and Eric Zakim over the past five years. Oliver was particularly gracious in agreeing to serve on the committee for this dissertation, and both he and Jonathan Auerbach have provided useful feedback in response to my ideas in the past years. Likewise, fellow graduate assistants Mike Quilligan, Arielle LaBrecque, and Jeff Eastman, as well as fellow grad students Andy Black, Paul Cote, and Adam Nixon helped me to feel like part of a community of peers while at UMD. My knowledge of Information Studies was fostered by faculty mentors during my time with Maryland’s iSchool. Bruce Ambacher and Jean Dryden provided me with my initial academic understanding of archives, while John Bertot and Paul Jaeger have worked with me over the past four years to guide my transition into iii academia and shape my knowledge of information policy. John and Paul guided the committee for this dissertation, and they have given me a wealth of opportunities to work on projects that have developed my professional reputation and competencies in recent years as I have worked under them at the Information Policy and Access Center (iPAC). I cannot overstate the value of their guidance and patience. Faculty members who have helped me in my development at the iSchool are too numerous to list in full. Ricky Punzalan deserves recognition for serving on my committee and for his considerable contributions to archival education at UMD and in the field broadly. Beth St. Jean was exceptionally kind and supportive in teaching me how to teach. Mega Subramaniam, Katie Shilton, Andrea Wiggins, Kari Kraus, Brian Butler, Michael Kurtz, and Doug Oard all provided academic guidance and a feeling of collegiality that made it a pleasure to be part of the iSchool. Likewise, the sense of community within iPAC was greatly enhanced by fellow PhD students Ursula Gorham, Natalie Greene Taylor, and Amanda Waugh, MLS Coordinator Lindsay Sarin, graduate research associates Frank Bonnevier, Liz Larson, Jean Lee, Ruth Lincoln, Abby McDermott, Becca Oxley, Johnna Percell, Kim White, and Erin Zerhusen, and many others. I am grateful for the various opportunities I had to test out and refine the concepts presented throughout this dissertation. The editors of The Moving Image, then Marsha Gordon and Devin Orgeron, provided much needed feedback on my article on the National Film Preservation Acts, which became the basis of chapters five and six. I am also grateful to the two anonymous peer reviewers, whose remarks were indispensable in helping me to refine my thoughts and find sources I had iv initially overlooked. I presented earlier versions of the discussions of George Stevens Jr. and the USIA Motion Picture Service, now part of chapter three, at the 2013 Northeast Historic Film Summer Symposium and the 2013 graduate conference Special Affects, organized and hosted by the Film Studies Graduate Student Organization at the University of Pittsburgh. Additionally, I was allowed to present some of my early thoughts on the founding and operations of the AFI at the 2013 Film & History Conference in Madison, WI. Without these opportunities to present my work to audiences and receive valuable feedback, this dissertation would not be what it is today. Archival materials for this study include Anthony Slide’s personal papers at the Center for Archival Studies at Bowling Green State University, as well as the Fred Zinnemann and Larry Karr papers at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Margaret Herrick Library. I am grateful to the staff of all of these institutions for their time and considerable patience. Anthony Slide deserves recognition for meticulously maintaining his and Larry Karr’s papers, as does Snowden Becker for providing me with a place to stay while conducting research at the Academy. Eric Schwartz, George Stevens Jr., and David Shepard were extremely generous with their time during interviews, and their candidness was much appreciated. Likewise, Paul Spehr, David Pierce, and Kim Tomadjoglou provided a wealth of informal advice. Their knowledge of the field of motion picture preservation cannot be understated and was indispensable for shaping this study. Beyond these three individuals, the film preservation community has been extremely v welcoming over the recent years, and I appreciate of the many individuals who have allowed me to be part of this world. Most importantly, I thank Sarah Cantor for her support over the last four years, including her patience with innumerable drafts of this text, her willingness to listen as I attempted to work through ideas, and being there during moments of doubt that inevitably come with an undertaking of this scale.
Recommended publications
  • Technological Alterations to Motion Pictures and Other Audiovisual Works
    Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 10 Number 1 Article 1 1-1-1990 Technological Alterations to Motion Pictures and Other Audiovisual Works: Implications for Creators, Copyright Owners, and Consumers—Report of the Register of Copyrights Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation , Technological Alterations to Motion Pictures and Other Audiovisual Works: Implications for Creators, Copyright Owners, and Consumers—Report of the Register of Copyrights, 10 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 1 (1989). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol10/iss1/1 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPORT TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS TO MOTION PICTURES AND OTHER AUDIOVISUAL WORKS: IMPLICATIONS FOR CREATORS, COPYRIGHT OWNERS, AND CONSUMERS Report Of The Register Of Copyrights March 1989 United States Copyright Office Washington, D.C.t TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Sum m ary ............................................ 4 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................ 11 Scope of the Copyright Office Study .......................... 11 Previous Copyright Office Actions ............................ 14 Issues Examined in this Report ............................... 16 Chapter 2: Copyright In The Motion Picture And Television Industries ...................................................... 18 Copyright Protection for Motion Pictures and Television Program s .................................................... 19 International Conventions .................................... 20 Universal Copyright Convention ............................ 20 The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works .........
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report, FY 2013
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2014 CONTENTS Letter from the Librarian of Congress ......................... 5 Organizational Reports ............................................... 47 Organization Chart ............................................... 48 Library of Congress Officers ........................................ 6 Congressional Research Service ............................ 50 Library of Congress Committees ................................. 7 U.S. Copyright Office ............................................ 52 Office of the Librarian .......................................... 54 Facts at a Glance ......................................................... 10 Law Library ........................................................... 56 Library Services .................................................... 58 Mission Statement. ...................................................... 11 Office of Strategic Initiatives ................................. 60 Serving the Congress................................................... 12 Office of Support Operations ............................... 62 Legislative Support ................................................ 13 Office of the Inspector General ............................ 63 Copyright Matters ................................................. 14 Copyright Royalty Board .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Yorker May 20 1985
    GOINGJ ON ABOUT TOWN A C0N5CIENT10U5 CALENDAR OF EVENT5 OF INTEREST "Smiles of a Summer Night," is the last m THE THEATRE s 'M* T • J • P • S this season's series of productions. (103rd St. PLAYS AND MUSICALS and Riverside Dr. Nightly, except Mondays, at 8. Matinees Saturdays and Sundays at Aren't We All?—A revival of a smart Mayfair 15 16 17 18 comedy of 1923, written by Frederick Lons- 2:30. Closes Sunday, June 2. For information dale. Claudette Colbert, Rex Harrison, Lynn 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 about tickets, for which contributions are Redgrave, Brenda Forbes, and George Rose requested, call 663-2028.) find no difficulty bringing it back to life. The Foreigner—A very funny play by (and with) (Reviewed in our issue of S/13/8S.) (Brooks sive Behavior," by Stuart Spencer; and Larry Shue, with good performances by every Atkinson, 256 W. 47th St. 719-4099. Tues "Between Cars," by Alan Zweibel: Wednes single member of the company, most notably days through Saturdays at 8. Matinfies day and Thursday, May 15-16, at 7:30, and by Kevin Geer as a lovable half-wit. Jerry Wednesdays and Saturdays at 2, and Sun Saturday, May 18, at 7 and 10 (previews); Zaks was the admirable director. (11/19/84) days at 3.) Monday, May 20, at 7:30 (opening); and (Astor Place Theatre. 434 Lafayette St., near As Is—^This touching play by William M. Thursday, May 23, at 7:30. ... <51 "Life Astor PI. 254-4370. Tuesdays through Fri Hoffman concerns a personable young homo- Under Water," by Richard Greenberg; "Mar- days at 8; Saturdays at 7 and 10; and Sun se.xual who is afflicted with AIDS, and is also iens Kammer," by Roger Hedden; "The Frog days at 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013
    The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RESOURCES AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 Mr. Pierce has also created a da tabase of location information on the archival film holdings identified in the course of his research. See www.loc.gov/film. Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Film Preservation Board Council on Library and Information Resources and The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. The National Film Preservation Board The National Film Preservation Board was established at the Library of Congress by the National Film Preservation Act of 1988, and most recently reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2008. Among the provisions of the law is a mandate to “undertake studies and investigations of film preservation activities as needed, including the efficacy of new technologies, and recommend solutions to- im prove these practices.” More information about the National Film Preservation Board can be found at http://www.loc.gov/film/. ISBN 978-1-932326-39-0 CLIR Publication No. 158 Copublished by: Council on Library and Information Resources The Library of Congress 1707 L Street NW, Suite 650 and 101 Independence Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20540 Web site at http://www.clir.org Web site at http://www.loc.gov Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders may be placed through CLIR’s Web site. This publication is also available online at no charge at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub158.
    [Show full text]
  • Boxoffice Barometer (March 6, 1961)
    MARCH 6, 1961 IN TWO SECTIONS SECTION TWO Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents William Wyler’s production of “BEN-HUR” starring CHARLTON HESTON • JACK HAWKINS • Haya Harareet • Stephen Boyd • Hugh Griffith • Martha Scott • with Cathy O’Donnell • Sam Jaffe • Screen Play by Karl Tunberg • Music by Miklos Rozsa • Produced by Sam Zimbalist. M-G-M . EVEN GREATER IN Continuing its success story with current and coming attractions like these! ...and this is only the beginning! "GO NAKED IN THE WORLD” c ( 'KSX'i "THE Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents GINA LOLLOBRIGIDA • ANTHONY FRANCIOSA • ERNEST BORGNINE in An Areola Production “GO SPINSTER” • • — Metrocolor) NAKED IN THE WORLD” with Luana Patten Will Kuluva Philip Ober ( CinemaScope John Kellogg • Nancy R. Pollock • Tracey Roberts • Screen Play by Ranald Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer pre- MacDougall • Based on the Book by Tom T. Chamales • Directed by sents SHIRLEY MacLAINE Ranald MacDougall • Produced by Aaron Rosenberg. LAURENCE HARVEY JACK HAWKINS in A Julian Blaustein Production “SPINSTER" with Nobu McCarthy • Screen Play by Ben Maddow • Based on the Novel by Sylvia Ashton- Warner • Directed by Charles Walters. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents David O. Selznick's Production of Margaret Mitchell’s Story of the Old South "GONE WITH THE WIND” starring CLARK GABLE • VIVIEN LEIGH • LESLIE HOWARD • OLIVIA deHAVILLAND • A Selznick International Picture • Screen Play by Sidney Howard • Music by Max Steiner Directed by Victor Fleming Technicolor ’) "GORGO ( Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents “GORGO” star- ring Bill Travers • William Sylvester • Vincent "THE SECRET PARTNER” Winter • Bruce Seton • Joseph O'Conor • Martin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents STEWART GRANGER Benson • Barry Keegan • Dervis Ward • Christopher HAYA HARAREET in “THE SECRET PARTNER” with Rhodes • Screen Play by John Loring and Daniel Bernard Lee • Screen Play by David Pursall and Jack Seddon Hyatt • Directed by Eugene Lourie • Executive Directed by Basil Dearden • Produced by Michael Relph.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Librarian of Congress
    ANNUAL REPO R T O F THE LIBR ARIAN OF CONGRESS ANNUAL REPORT OF T HE L IBRARIAN OF CONGRESS For the Fiscal Year Ending September , Washington Library of Congress Independence Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC For the Library of Congress on the World Wide Web visit: <www.loc.gov>. The annual report is published through the Public Affairs Office, Office of the Librarian, Library of Congress, Washington, DC -, and the Publishing Office, Library Services, Library of Congress, Washington, DC -. Telephone () - (Public Affairs) or () - (Publishing). Managing Editor: Audrey Fischer Copyediting: Publications Professionals LLC Indexer: Victoria Agee, Agee Indexing Design and Composition: Anne Theilgard, Kachergis Book Design Production Manager: Gloria Baskerville-Holmes Assistant Production Manager: Clarke Allen Library of Congress Catalog Card Number - - Key title: Annual Report of the Librarian of Congress For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP Washington, DC - A Letter from the Librarian of Congress / vii Library of Congress Officers and Consultants / ix Organization Chart / x Library of Congress Committees / xiii Highlights of / Library of Congress Bicentennial / Bicentennial Chronology / Congressional Research Service / Copyright Office / Law Library of Congress / Library Services / National Digital Library Program / Office of the Librarian / A. Bicentennial / . Steering Committee / . Local Legacies / . Exhibitions / . Publications / . Symposia / . Concerts: I Hear America Singing / . Living Legends / . Commemorative Coins / . Commemorative Stamp: Second-Day Issue Sites / . Gifts to the Nation / . International Gifts to the Nation / v vi Contents B. Major Events at the Library / C. The Librarian’s Testimony / D. Advisory Bodies / E. Honors / F. Selected Acquisitions / G. Exhibitions / H. Online Collections and Exhibitions / I.
    [Show full text]
  • All Aware of Course That the Annual Report of the Oscar Long Ago Attained an Extraor­ Academy of Motion Picture Dinary Stature
    Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and Academy Foundation Annual Report 83/84 From the President ' m delighted to present to you We' re all aware of course that the Annual Report of the Oscar long ago attained an extraor­ Academy of Motion Picture dinary stature. One of the most pleas­ I Arts and Sciences and the urable aspects of this first year as Academy Foundation. As you will see your president has been the chance in the pages that follow, 1983-84 was I've had to see firsthand just how a year of continuing achievement. broad and how deep is the worldwide Note particularly the accomplish­ respect for our symbol and the insti­ ments of our Players Directory, our tution he represents. This summer I Visiting Artists program, our Semi­ accepted an invitation from the U.S. nars, Exhibitions, Lectures and Information Agency to represent Salutes. Statistics continue to show the Academy in a visit to five East that students, scholars, researchers, European nations. writers, critics, and filmmakers are Everywhere I went-in Belgrade, making use of our magnificent Budapest, East Berlin, Prague, Sofia, Margaret Herrick Library in ever­ Zagreb, and at Czechoslovakia's dis­ increasing numbers. As a matter of tinguished Karlovy Vary Festival- fact, finding space in which our con­ I met filmmakers who spoke warmly stantly-expanding archives can be and with obvious sincerity about what made both safe and accessible has the Academy meant to artists in their been a continuing and pressing countries. I was made aware in a concern. variety of ways by a great many peo­ We've found short-term solutions ple that our nominations history, to that problem this year; in next particularly in the Foreign Language year's report I'll detail our plans for and Animation categories, has won the establishment of the "Academy us a reputation for integrity that is Cinema Center," a project of large unmatched in the world of film.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Prawer Jhabvala's Adapted Screenplays
    Absorbing the Worlds of Others: Ruth Prawer Jhabvala’s Adapted Screenplays By Laura Fryer Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of a PhD degree at De Montfort University, Leicester. Funded by Midlands 3 Cities and the Arts and Humanities Research Council. June 2020 i Abstract Despite being a prolific and well-decorated adapter and screenwriter, the screenplays of Ruth Prawer Jhabvala are largely overlooked in adaptation studies. This is likely, in part, because her life and career are characterised by the paradox of being an outsider on the inside: whether that be as a European writing in and about India, as a novelist in film or as a woman in industry. The aims of this thesis are threefold: to explore the reasons behind her neglect in criticism, to uncover her contributions to the film adaptations she worked on and to draw together the fields of screenwriting and adaptation studies. Surveying both existing academic studies in film history, screenwriting and adaptation in Chapter 1 -- as well as publicity materials in Chapter 2 -- reveals that screenwriting in general is on the periphery of considerations of film authorship. In Chapter 2, I employ Sandra Gilbert’s and Susan Gubar’s notions of ‘the madwoman in the attic’ and ‘the angel in the house’ to portrayals of screenwriters, arguing that Jhabvala purposely cultivates an impression of herself as the latter -- a submissive screenwriter, of no threat to patriarchal or directorial power -- to protect herself from any negative attention as the former. However, the archival materials examined in Chapter 3 which include screenplay drafts, reveal her to have made significant contributions to problem-solving, characterisation and tone.
    [Show full text]
  • Population and Sexuality: the Hollywood Connection
    SPECIAL COMBINED ISSUE-VOL. XI INDEX Volume XI Number 5/6 May-July 1983 ISSN:0091-3995 Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S. POPULATION AND SEXUALITY: THE HOLLYWOOD CONNECTION Norman Fleishman Director, the TV Project The Center for Population Options Los Angeles, California [/n recent volumes, the SIECUS Report has discussed the ways challenging opportunity then; it still is, 10 years later, and as far in which sex education is provided through parents, teachers, as I know-as a full-time occupation-it is unique anywhere in therapists, medical schools, church and community groups, the world. There are scads of lobbyists in political circles, youth agencies, disability organizations, gay/lesbian groups, spending hundreds of millions of dollars annually. In enter- and many others. This issue highlights a powerful source ofsex tainment, there is just me. education that has only recently become the object of re- Looking back at the IO years of my work as an “outsider,” search and scrutiny-the medium of tetevison. Concernedsex- an educator-lobbyist in Hollywood, two experiences stand uality professionals are now coming up with important ques- out. Both are related to the person who pioneered in the tions: What can be done to ensure that the millions of viewers blending of controversial social issues with entertainment TV- are exposed to accurate information and positive attitudes Norman Lear. The first centered around the making of an epi- concerning all aspects of sexuality? How can trained and sode of A// in the Family. Michael (“Meathead”) and Gloria knowledgeable experts in the field exert a positive influence work through their fears and doubts, have richly textured on television program content? Who will lobby for increased searchings and quarrels (some of them, of course, hilarious), coverage of important sexual health issues? and conclude with Michael’s going to a hip (“Let’s boogie!“) Obviously, one issue of a journal cannot begin to answer physician for a nearly on-camera vasectomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Tragedy, Echoed by a Chorus of Veterans - the New York Times
    The Lunatic Is on the Air: A Stoppard Radio Play for Pink Floyd's 'Dark Side of the Moon' - NYTimes.com MARCH 28, 2013, 8:51 AM The Lunatic Is on the Air: A Stoppard Radio Play for Pink Floyd’s ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ By DAVE ITZKOFF The 40th anniversary of the release of “The Dark Side of the Moon,” that best-selling Pink Floyd album, technically occurred earlier this month. But in the case of a seminal prog-rock record that deals with the nature of time (and the slowing-down thereof), we’ll forgive Tom Stoppard if his unique effort to celebrate this milestone doesn’t actually arrive until the summer. Mr. Stoppard, the celebrated playwright of “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead” and “The Coast of Utopia” and a screenwriter of “Shakespeare in Love,” among many other works, has written a new play for British radio that will mark the 40 years since “The Dark Side of the Moon” was released in March 1973, The Guardian reported. But this latest dramatic work is no simple narrative of how Roger Waters, David Gilmour and company spent several months at Abbey Road recording songs like “Money,” “Time” and “Breathe.” This one’s … a little weird. Describing Mr. Stoppard’s radio play, called “Dark Side,” at its Web site, the BBC called it “a fantastical and psychedelic story based on themes from the seminal album” that incorporates “music from the album and a gripping story that takes listeners on a journey through their imaginations.” (So keep your black-light posters handy, apparently.) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • CTCS 464: the Romantic Comedy in Classical, Postwar, and Reactionary/Revolutionary Hollywood (1929 – 1976)
    CTCS 464: The Romantic Comedy In Classical, Postwar, and Reactionary/Revolutionary Hollywood (1929 – 1976) Summer 2009 (First Session) Monday & Wednesdays 1 p.m to 5:30 p.m. Norris Theater Instructor: Dr. Drew Casper The Alma and Alfred Hitchcock Professor of American Film Course Description: An in-depth analysis the myths, conventions and iconographies of the romantic comedy genre in its Classical, Postwar and Reactionary/Revolutionary periods, this course will explore its extra-cinematic determinants (major historical events, economic situations, societal issues and other popular leisure activities) and cinematic determinants (business, technology, censorship, generic patterns, major directors, the star and the star system). Finally, this course will also examine the major theoretical issues of the genre. Teaching Assistants: Kate Fortmueller ([email protected]) & David Lerner ([email protected]). Office Hours: IMS Building, 2nd Floor, Monday and Wednesday 11:30 – 12:30pm Dr. Casper’s Office Hours: 12:00 – 1:00pm, Monday and Wednesday 323 School of Cinematic Arts Building – (213) 740-3334 If you wish to see Dr. Casper during his office hours, you must make an appointment in advance by signing up on the appointment sheet at the front desk of the Critical Studies office (SCA 320). Course Requirements: I. Attendance: Prompt and regular attendance for the full class period is of extreme importance. Missing the screening of any film will seriously limit your success in the course. NOT ALL OF THE FILMS SCREENED IN CLASS ARE AVAILABLE ON VIDEOTAPE OR DVD. It is your responsibility to make up any missed screenings and to obtain detailed notes from another student.
    [Show full text]
  • Lilms Perisllecl
    Film History, Volume 9, pp. 5-22, 1997. Text copyrig ht © 1997 David Pierce. Design, etc. copyright© John libbey & Company. ISSN: 0892-2 160. Pri nted in Australia l'lle legion of file conclemnecl - wlly American silenf lilms perisllecl David Pierce f the approximately 1 0 ,000 feature print survives for most silent films, usually therewere films and countless short subjects re­ not many copies lo begin with . While newspapers leased in the United States before or magazines were printed and sold by the thou­ O 1928, only a small portion survive . sands, relatively few projection prints were re­ While so me classics existand are widelyavailable, quired for even the most popular silent films . In the many silent films survive only in reviews, stills, pos­ earliest days of the industry, producers sold prints, ters and the memories of the few remaining audi­ and measured success bythe number ofcopies sol d. ence members who saw them on their original By the feature period, beginning around 1914, release. 1 copies were leased lo subdistributors or rented lo Why did most silent films not survive the pas­ exhibitors, and the owners retained tight control. sage of time? The curren! widespread availability The distribution of silent features was based on a of many tilles on home video, and the popularity of staggered release system, with filmgoers paying silent film presentations with live orchestral accom­ more lo see a film early in its run. Films opened in paniment might give the impression that silent films downtown theatres, moved lo neighbourhood had always been held in such high regard .
    [Show full text]