DOCSLIB.ORG

Virginia Massive Resistance and Little Rock and the Lost Year Tessa Dallo the Gray Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Virginia Massive Resistance and Little Rock and the Lost Year Tessa Dallo the Gray Commission Virginia Massive Resistance and Little Rock and the Lost Year Tessa Dallo The Gray Commission • Thomas B Stanley, governor of Virginia, appointed 32 state lawmakers to make a plan of response to the decision of Brown II. • They were all white, male Americans. • Their plan allowed for integraon, but its overall goal was to slow its process. • When a Washington county announced it was going to integrate its school systems, state legislators did what they could to nullify the Supreme Court’s ruling. The Stanley Plan • When the Gray plan failed, governor Stanley created the Stanley Plan. • Stanley was concerned that if one school integrated, the surrounding schools would integrate as well because of a domino effect. • African Americans were suing school districts throughout the state because Virginia would not permit integrated public schools. Governor Stanley revised his plan in late 1956 to: • Require that if a school official assigned a black pupil to a white school, that official would be suspended. • Give the governor the authority to inves@gate assignment of black pupils to white schools, and ask black students to return to their original all-black school. • Allow the closure of either a single classroom in a white school or the en@re school itself, if integraon occurred. • Give the governor the authority to reassign students to new schools if a school was ordered to integrate or voluntarily integrated. • Create tui@on grants to encourage black students to leave white schools. • Permit the governor to withhold state funds from any school district where segregaon had failed. Actions of the Massive Resistance • These strict ac@ons against integraon are known as the Massive Resistance. • J Lindsay Almond, an ac@ve supporter of the Massive Resistance, shut down mul@ple schools and locked out over 13,000 students. • Even when Almond was told his ac@ons were harmful to the state and its economy, he would not reopen the schools. Actions of the Massive Resistance • White parents who favored integraon started the Virginia CommiSee for Public Schools to help with the integraon crisis. • In January of 1959, the Virginia Supreme Court agreed that Almond closing public schools was highly uncons@tu@onal. • Almond repealed aspects of the Stanley Plan and created a plan of his own. The Perrow Plan • This plan was created by the Almond Administraon and it relied on a parent’s “freedom of choice.” • The parent would decide where they want their child to go to school. • “Freedom of choice” was created to avoid compliance with integraon. • Although many people s@ll advocated for Massive Resistance, the Perrow Plan became law in 1959. • But it wasn’t un@l 1964 that all schools finally allowed integraon. • Prince Edward County kept its school’s doors shut for years aer the Perrow Plan became law just so they did not have to integrate. Green v. New Kent County • It was not un@l this case that “freedom of choice” was abolished. • The Supreme Count ordered the School Board of New Kent County to create a new plan towards realis@cally conver@ng to an integrated school system. Green v. New Kent County • In Kent County, about half of the resident were white and half were black. • In addi@on, there were only two schools: the New Kent School for white students and the George W. Watkins School for black students. • When 35 black students transferred to the previously all-white school, they were harassed and administrators did not seem to care. • New Kent changed its school system by grade level instead of race: George W. Watkins Elementary School, and New Kent High School. The Blossom Plan • This plan allowed for a school’s superintendent to chose which African American students to integrate into previously all-white schools. • The purpose of this was to comply as liSle as possible to the standards of integraon. • Although the Naonal Administraon for the Advancement of Colored People, the NAACP, sued for immediate integraon, the federal court claimed the plan was cons@tu@onal. The Capital Citizens’ Council • The CCC was created in support against integraon. • They organized rallies where speakers tried to promote white supremacy and segregaon. Mother’s League of Central High School • In order to aract feminists, the CCC created the Mother’s League of Central High School. • Only 20% of its members were actually mothers of Central High Schoolers. • The school district feared the CCC and the MLCHS because they incited violence. Central High School Incident • On September 4, 1957 Governor Orval Faubus ordered the Arkansas Naonal Guard to surround Central High School to prevent violence. • Instead of guarding the African American students as they entered the school, the Naonal Guard was in place to prevent their entry. • 9 African American students aempted to enter the school, but they were stopped by an angry crowed of white students and parents and the Arkansas Naonal Guard. The Little Rock Nine • The LiSle Rock Nine faced by both verbal and physical harassment in Central High School. • Teachers ignored these nine students and any harmful ac@ons inflicted on them. • They were not allowed to par@cipate in any extra curricular ac@vi@es either. Eisenhower’s Intervention • A\er the nine African American students made it into Central High School one day aer the Arkansas Naonal Guard was called off, an angry crowd erupted. • This event caught the aen@on of Eisenhower because it challenged the authority of the federal government. • Eisenhower ordered about 1,200 troops to LiSle Rock and on September 25, 1957 the nine students were escorted into Central High School by US Soldiers. • They were also escorted to each class they had by the soldiers as well. Eisenhower’s Intervention • Eisenhower took the Arkansas Naonal Guard out of the power of the governor and into his power. • For the remainder of the students’ school year, the Naonal Guard stayed at the school to protect the LiSle Rock Nine. Cooper v. Aaron • This was a landmark decision which held that the states are bound by the Court's decisions and must enforce them even if they disagree with them. • The Supreme Court ruled that integraon must take place immediately. • In response, governor Faubus closed down all of the high schools in LiSle Rock and they remained closed for the year. Act 115 and Act 110 • Act 115 banned NAACP members from being employed by the state of Arkansas. • Act 110 required state employees to state if they were a member of the NAACP • They were created to in@midate the NAACP. Other Protests and Actions • Public facili@es and transport were also integrated in the 50s and 60s: • Montgomery Bus BoycoS • Freedom Rides • These led to the creaon of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. • Vo@ng Rights were also focused on: • Freedom Summer • Other various organized campaigns • These led to the Vo@ng Rights Act of 1965. Cited Sources • Eisenhower Address on LiSle Rock Integraon Problem . Perf. Dwight D. Eisenhower. 1957. News Broadcast. YouTube. Taylor F., 2 Jan. 2013. Web. 3 May 2017. <hSps://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=8bzmtkhXAno • Eskridge, Sara K. "Thomas B. Stanley (1890–1970)." Encyclopedia Virginia. Virginia Foundaon for the Humani@es, 30 Dec. 2014. Web. 28 Apr. 2017. • FREEDOM RIDERS, 1961. - The wreckage of a Greyhound bus carrying Freedom Riders aer it had been destroyed by a fire bomb near Anniston, Alabama, 14 May 1961.. Fine Art. Britannica ImageQuest, Encyclopædia Britannica, 25 May 2016. quest.eb.com/search/ 140_1683643/1/140_1683643/cite. Accessed 2 May 2017. • Mitch. "Inalienable means ALL of us!!" Adventures of a Middle Aged Geek. Mitch, n.d. Web. 23 Apr. 2017. <hSp://www.middleagedgeek.net/?paged=2>. • NAACP Centennial Conven@on. Photographer. Britannica ImageQuest, Encyclopædia Britannica, 25 May 2016. quest.eb.com/search/115_2223724/1/115_2223724/cite. Accessed 2 May 2017. • Rogers, Mark, and Peter Clinton. Rights and Protest. Oxford: Oxford U Press, n.d. Print. Oxford IB Diploma Program. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - College of Education & Professional Studies Urban Education (Darden) Winter 1991 The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis Alexander Stewart Leidholdt Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Education Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Race and Ethnicity Commons Recommended Citation Leidholdt, Alexander S.. "The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis" (1991). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, , Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/tb1v-f795 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds/119 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Education & Professional Studies (Darden) at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - Urban Education by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT NEWSPAPER'S ROLE IN MODERATING NORFOLK, VIRGINIA'S 1958 SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CRISIS by Alexander Stewart Leidholdt B.A. May 1978, Virginia Wesleyan College M.S. May 1980, Clarion University Ed.S. December 1984, Indiana University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion Unversity in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY URBAN SERVICES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December, 1991 Approved By: Maurice R. Berube, Dissertation Chair Concentration Area^TFlrector ember Dean of the College of Education Member Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System
    Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges Volume 22 | Issue 2 Article 6 10-10-2019 Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System Richard A. Hodges Ed.D., Thomas Nelson Community College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry Part of the Higher Education Commons, History Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Hodges, R. A. (2019). Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 22 (2). Retrieved from https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/vol22/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ VCCS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inquiry: The ourJ nal of the Virginia Community Colleges by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ VCCS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hodges: Massive Resistance and the Origins of the VTCS MASSIVE RESISTANCE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE VIRGINIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM RICHARD A. HODGES INTRODUCTION In the summer of 1964, Dr. Dana B. Hamel, Director of the Roanoke Technical Institute in Roanoke, Virginia received a phone call that would change the course of Virginia higher education. The call was from Virginia Governor Albertis Harrison requesting Hamel serve as the Director of the soon to be established Department of Technical Education. The department, along with its governing board, would quickly establish a system of technical colleges located regionally throughout Virginia, with the first of those colleges opening their doors for classes in the fall of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Massive Folly
    Undergraduate Research Journal at UCCS Volume 2.1, Spring 2009 Virginia’s “Massive Folly”: Harry Byrd, Prince Edward County, and the Front Line Laura Grant Dept. of History, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Abstract This paper examines the closure of public schools in Prince Edward County, Virginia from 1959- 1964 in an effort to avoid desegregation. Specifically, the paper traces the roots of the political actions which led to the closure and then-Governor Harry Byrd's role in Virginia's political machine at the time. The paper argues that it was Byrd's influence which led to the conditions that not only made the closure possible in Virginia, but encouraged the white citizens of Prince Edward County to make their stand. In September, 1959, the public schools in Prince Edward County, Virginia closed their doors to all students. While most white students were educated in makeshift private schools, the doors of public education remained closed until the Supreme Court ordered the schools to reopen in 1964. This drastic episode in Virginia’s history was a response to the public school integration mandated by the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954. Prince Edward County was not the only district in Virginia to take this action; it was merely the most extreme case of resistance after state laws banning integration were struck down as unconstitutional. Schools all over the state closed, most only temporarily, and the white community rallied to offer white students assistance to attend segregated private schools rather than face integration in a movement termed “Massive Resistance.” While this “Brown backlash” occurred all over the South, it was most prevalent in the Deep South.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Labor History of the College of William and Mary
    1 Integration at Work: The First Labor History of The College of William and Mary Williamsburg has always been a quietly conservative town. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century to the time of the Civil Rights Act, change happened slowly. Opportunities for African American residents had changed little after the Civil War. The black community was largely regulated to separate schools, segregated residential districts, and menial labor and unskilled jobs in town. Even as the town experienced economic success following the restoration of Colonial Williamsburg in the early 1930s, African Americans did not receive a proportional share of that prosperity. As the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation bought up land in the center of town, the displaced community dispersed to racially segregated neighborhoods. Black residents were relegated to the physical and figurative margins of the town. More than ever, there was a social disconnect between the city, the African American community, and Williamsburg institutions including Colonial Williamsburg and the College of William and Mary. As one of the town’s largest employers, the College of William and Mary served both to create and reinforce this divide. While many African Americans found employment at the College, supervisory roles were without exception held by white workers, a trend that continued into the 1970s. While reinforcing notions of servility in its hiring practices, the College generally embodied traditional southern racial boundaries in its admissions policy as well. As in Williamsburg, change at the College was a gradual and halting process. This resistance to change was characteristic of southern ideology of the time, but the gentle paternalism of Virginians in particular shaped the College’s actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Edward County: the Story Without an End a Report Prepared for the U.S
    Prince Edward County: The Story Without An End A Report Prepared for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, July 1963 Special Note to the Contemporary Reader This unpublished manuscript was prepared as a working paper for a larger report written by Dr. J. Kenneth Morland for the Virginia Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in the early summer of 1963. Dr. Morland was a Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at Randolph­Macon Woman's College and one of the original social science expert witnesses in the 1954 Supreme Court case "Brown vs Board of Education". He was recruited to prepare the final report for publication by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in Washington, D.C. It was anticipated that publication of the final report, using this paper and other data, would encourage the reopening of the Prince Edward County public schools and stimulate the provision of temporary educational offerings to the school­less black children in the 1963­1964 school year, the fifth year of school closing. My contributing paper is reproduced here exactly the way it was written. It was based on interviews and other research done for my Masters thesis, A Perspective of the Prince Edward County School Issue, as well as further interviews and research conducted immediately after the thesis was written. I was reimbursed for my expenses and awarded a small honorarium through an agreement between the U.S. Civil Rights Commission and the Virginia Council on Human Relations. The footnotes were submitted separately from the draft and have long since been lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia and Massive Resistance
    Virginia and Massive Resistance Amelia Richardson and Emily Ganley Timeline of the Massive Resistance 1. Brown II is taken on by the Warren Court (1955-56) 2. The Gray Commission is formed. Official response to Brown II: 11/11/1955 3. Feb. 12, 1956: Senator Harry F. Bird calls for “Massive Resistance” 4. March 1956: “Southern Manifesto” 5. September 1956: The Stanley Plan 6. January 1958 Lindsay Almond becomes governor of Virginia 7. 1958-1964 Schools close because of not wanting to desegregate 8. 1968- Green vs. New Kent County The Gray Commission ● While the Supreme Court deliberates Brown II, this Commission was made to form Virginia’s response to the plan ● 32 Virginian State Lawmakers appointed by governor Thomas B. Stanley ○ Appointed 8/30/1954 ○ Called “The Commission on Public Education,” or “The General Assembly” headed by Garland Gray ○ All white men, most representing Southside Virginia counties ● Found Brown II to be wrong (shocking!!!) and segregation to be right ○ Brown II didn’t follow the precedents of other courts ○ Segregation good for blacks, too ○ The Supreme Court no "gave no consideration to the adverse effect of integration upon white children." The Gray Plan ● Proposed a local option: technically allowed desegregation, but its goal was to inhibit any actual desegregation. ○ Final report: 11/11/1955 ○ 1) Localities have the power to assign students to schools ○ 2) Since they had decided that no child should be forced to go to a desegregated school… parents should be given tuition grants for alternative education (Involved amending state constitution) ○ Gave local governments the power because they were closest to the people, in order to avoid “enforced integration” ● Criticism: being too compliant with Brown ○ It would cause desegregation in localities that allowed it Senator Harry F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opponents of Virginia's Massive Resistance
    A RUMBLING IN THE MUSEUI^t: THE OPPONENTS OF VIRGINIA'S MASSIVE RESISTANCE James Howard Hershman, Jr. Leesburg, Virginia B.A., Lynchburg College, 1969 M.A., Wake Forest University, 1971 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia August, 1978 0 Copyright by James Howard Hershman, Jr 1978 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT A Rumbling in the Museum: The Opponents of Virginia's Massive Resistance James Howard Hershman, Jr. University of Virginia, 1978 This dissertation is a study of the blacks and white liberals and moderates who opposed Virginia's policy of mas- sive resistance to the United States Supreme Court's school desegregation ruling in the Brown case. The origin of and continued demand for desegregation came from black Virginians who were challenging an oppressive racial caste system that greatly limited their freedom as American citizens. In the 1930's they b^gan demanding teacher salaries and school facilities equal to their white counter- parts. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People provided lawyers and organizational assistance as the school protests became a mass movement among black Virginians. In 1951, the protest became an attack on public school segre- gation itself. /V The Brown decision and the response to it split white opinion into three groups. A few white liberals publicly ac- cepted racial integration as good; extreme segregationists vehemently rejected any change in the racial caste system; a third group occupied the more complex middle or moderate posi- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Augusta Historical Bulletin
    Augusta Historical Bulletin Published by the AUGUSTA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1964 Post Office Box 686 Staunton, Virginia 24402-0686 VOLUME 42 2006 Virginia facing reality The 1959 Perrow Commission by George M. Cochran Virginia Supreme Court Justice, retired The Augusta County Historical Society is pleased to present to its members the following document which details an important part of mid-twentieth century Virginia history. The author, Justice George Moffett Cochran, a longtime member of our organization, has presented this document to the society for its archives. Justice Cochran, who was born in Staunton in 1912, is the son of local attorney Peyton Cochran, and a descendant of A.H.H. Stuart, probably Staunton’s most significant political figure of the nineteenth century. Justice Cochran graduated from Robert E. Lee High School, studied at the University of Virginia, completed his legal training and practiced with his father in Staunton. He served with the U.S. Navy during World War II, from January of 1942 to January of 1946, then returned to the practice of law. From 1948 to 1966 he served in the Virginia House of Delegates, and in 1966 was elected to the Virginia Senate. In 1969 he was appointed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, where he served until retiring in 1987. From the museum’s founding in 1986 until 1998, Cochran was chairman of the board of the Museum of American Frontier Culture in Staunton. His recollections of the work of the Perrow Commission that follow provide an excellent record of a difficult period in Virginia history, one in which Cochran played a significant role in breaking Virginia’s long tradition of racial discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Initial Reactions to the Brown V. Board of Education Decision Charles E
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 1967 Virginia's initial reactions to the Brown v. Board of Education decision Charles E. Poston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Poston, Charles E., "Virginia's initial reactions to the Brown v. Board of Education decision" (1967). Honors Theses. Paper 685. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES llll I llll Ill Ill II lllll lllll IIll llll II Iii Iii II Iii IIll iii 1111111 3 3082 01030 8616 ~ Virginia's Initial Reactions To the Brown ~ Board of Education Decision Honors Thesis for Dr. F.W. Gregory In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Bachelor of Arts Charles Evans Poston 1967 Foreword In writing this paper I have examined the initial reaction of Virginia's leaders to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Brown v. Board of Education suit. My study begins with announcement of the decision on May 17, 1954. As the weeks passed on the Commonwealth of Virginia gradually changed her course, experimented with expedients, and set her mind on the course of resistance. The General Assembly proved this fact by adopting the Resolution of Interposition on February 1,1956. A natural termination date for the ~aper is reached at this point.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Virginia Technical College System
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects Spring 2016 Emerging from Resistance: The Origins of the Virginia Technical College System Richard Allen Hodges College of William and Mary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Hodges, Richard Allen, "Emerging from Resistance: The Origins of the Virginia Technical College System" (2016). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1463428492. http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/W45P49 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Emerging From Resistance: The Origins of the Virginia Technical College System A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Education The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Education By Richard Allen Hodges May 2016 Emerging From Resistance: The Origins of the Virginia Technical College System by Richard Allen Hodges _________________________________________________________________ Approved May 2016 Pamela L. Eddy, Ph.D., Committee Chair Eddie R. Cole, Ph.D. John J. McGlennon, Ph.D. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this dissertation to Dr. Dana B. Hamel, founding Director of the Virginia Department of Technical Education and founding Chancellor of the Virginia Community College System (VCCS). I can say without hesitation, this project would not have happened without Dana.
    [Show full text]
  • A Former Governor's Reflections on Massive Resistance in Virginia Linwood Holton
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 49 | Issue 1 Article 5 Winter 1-1-1992 A Former Governor'S Reflections On Massive Resistance In Virginia Linwood Holton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Education Law Commons Recommended Citation Linwood Holton, A Former Governor'S Reflections On Massive Resistance In Virginia, 49 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 15 (1992), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol49/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FORMER GOVERNOR'S REFLECTIONS ON MASSIVE RESISTANCE IN VIRGINIA TEE HONORABLE LINwOOD HOLTON* "The Warren Court will outlaw segregation in the public schools of the South." Thus my father-in-law, Frank W. Rogers, a prominent Virginia lawyer whose offices were in Roanoke, chided me about the new Eisenhower Administration which I had, as Roanoke City Republican Chairman, worked so hard to help elect. Frank had already been disturbed by the new Postmaster General's proposal to abolish the small rural post office at Airpoint, Virginia where Frank got his mail in the summertime. That was bad enough, but the predicted action of the Supreme Court might to his mind be even worse! "Not a chance!" I responded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desegregation of Arlington County Public Schools and How We Remember It
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2021 “All Is Quiet in Arlington”: The Desegregation of Arlington County Public Schools and How We Remember It Ella Benbow Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the American Politics Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Education Commons Recommended Citation Benbow, Ella, "“All Is Quiet in Arlington”: The Desegregation of Arlington County Public Schools and How We Remember It" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1713. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1713 This Honors Thesis -- Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..…………3 Chapter One: Setting the Stage…………………………………………………………………..11 Chapter Two: Desegregation in Practice ……………………………………………….……….30 Chapter Three: Remembering Arlington’s Desegregation………………………………..…….50 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………61 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………..…63 2 Introduction Arlington, Virginia’s schools were the first to desegregate within the Commonwealth of Virginia. Newspaper coverage describes the day that four Black students walked into a previously all white school as “quiet” and “peaceful.” This image of the desegregation of Arlington County has been remembered and repeated, with the more difficult, divisive, and even violent parts of the story being erased overtime. There were around one hundred police stationed outside of the school in case something went wrong—a distinct possibility after racist hate-mail, crosses burned in yards, and neo-Nazi groups disrupting peaceful community meetings.
    [Show full text]