The Opponents of Virginia's Massive Resistance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Opponents of Virginia's Massive Resistance A RUMBLING IN THE MUSEUI^t: THE OPPONENTS OF VIRGINIA'S MASSIVE RESISTANCE James Howard Hershman, Jr. Leesburg, Virginia B.A., Lynchburg College, 1969 M.A., Wake Forest University, 1971 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia August, 1978 0 Copyright by James Howard Hershman, Jr 1978 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT A Rumbling in the Museum: The Opponents of Virginia's Massive Resistance James Howard Hershman, Jr. University of Virginia, 1978 This dissertation is a study of the blacks and white liberals and moderates who opposed Virginia's policy of mas- sive resistance to the United States Supreme Court's school desegregation ruling in the Brown case. The origin of and continued demand for desegregation came from black Virginians who were challenging an oppressive racial caste system that greatly limited their freedom as American citizens. In the 1930's they b^gan demanding teacher salaries and school facilities equal to their white counter- parts. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People provided lawyers and organizational assistance as the school protests became a mass movement among black Virginians. In 1951, the protest became an attack on public school segre- gation itself. /V The Brown decision and the response to it split white opinion into three groups. A few white liberals publicly ac- cepted racial integration as good; extreme segregationists vehemently rejected any change in the racial caste system; a third group occupied the more complex middle or moderate posi- tion. The political leadership of the moderates came from a diverse group of figures drawn from all of the state's major political factions and parties. The moderate leaders favored 2 modernization o£ state government, rapid industrial and economic growth, and a strong system of public education. Before the Brown ruling, many moderates were prepared to make some con- cessions to black Virginians and to ameliorate the blatant humiliations of the racial caste system. Their response tq^. Brown was conditioned by their belief in obedience to consti- tutional authQritY^.th£±iL_c.Qmiiii-tme4Vt—to, public education and economic growth, and their concern for the international image of the United States as a democratic society. In practical terms, their response to Brown was to compromise, allow some desegregation, preserve the public schools, and, in general, to limit and slow down the changes in the racial caste system. Moderate plans centered on the use of pupil assignment procedures by local school boards to limit desegregation. In contrast to the massive resistance program, which required a state-wide unity of defiance, the moderates believed that localities should determine their own adjustment to desegrega- tion. The diverse and highly individualistic moderate leaders, however, failed to provide a unified opposition leadership and were unable to overcome the emotional appeal of the extreme segregationists. The repressive and obstructionist tactics of massive resistance, however, did not stop the black demand for desegre- gation, and NAACP attorneys fought and defeated in the federal courts the various legal bulwarks of the resistance plan. In 1958, with the prospect of closed public schools an approach- ing reality, massive resister control over public opinion and 3 the political arena began to slip. Middle class white citizens in several communities threatened by school closing organized "save our schools" committees. These citizens, "joined'by the managers of some of the industries that had recently entered the state, formed an effective state-wide lobby group, the Virginia Committee for Public Schools. In January, 1959, when the federal and state courts struck down the school closing laws, moderate forces were strong enough to back successfully Governor Almond's retreat from the resistance camp and block any attempt to continue the defiance of the federal courts. Moderate thinking prevailed when the Perrow Commission formu- J lated a new plan to deal with desegregation. In the 1959 primary election, moderates, backed by liberals and blacks, decisively turned back a massive resister political offensive. Catching the shift in public sentiment, significant leaders of the Byrd Organization adopted the public education issue and other moderate issues, thus keeping the Byrd Organization in power another decade while jettisoning many of its tradi- tional policies. After briefly allying in 1959, moderates^ and liberals split and, ironically, the moderate school plan became the next obstacle in blacks' struggle for full school desegregation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the result of six years of research and writing. I have received assistance in its research and preparation from many persons whose contributions can be men- tioned only briefly in this statement. Professor Paul M. Gaston directed the study and was a source of valuable sug- gestions and comments in each stage of its development. The editing and comments of Professor Carl M. Brauer, Professor D. Alan Williams, and Mr. Staige Blackford of the Virginia Quarterly Review helped greatly in the final preparation of the dissertation. This study owes much to a group of archivists who have diligently and vigorously gathered material on modern Virginia history. Mr. William Ray, Mr. Douglas Tanner, and Mr. Michael Plunkett of Alderman Library of the University of Virginia and Dr. James Sweeney of Old Dominion University have given special attention to my research needs and have been an unfailing source of encouragement. The staff of the Southern Historical Collection at the University of North Carolina also provided assistance. Many Virginians have been generous in giving me their time and in opening their private papers for me. I would like especially to thank Dr. James Bash, Mr. Armistead L. Boothe, Mrs. J.L. Blair Buck, the late Dr. Ralph Cherry, Mr. and Mrs. Edmund D. Campbell, Mr. George Ferguson, Dr. E. E. Haddock, Mr. Oliver Hill, Mr. Henry E. Howell, Jr., Mr. William M. Lightsey, Dr. Peter Mellette, Mr. Francis P. Miller, Mr. H. Graham Morison, the late Mr. Paul Schweitzer, Dr. 0. Glenn Stahl, Mr. S. W. Tucker, and Mr. T. H. Wilson, II. iv Dr. Joseph R. Washington, Dr. Vivian Gordon, Dr. Alfred L. Cobbs, and especially the students in Afro-American Studies at the University of Virginia expanded my understanding of the perspective of black Virginians. Two other Virginians, Mr. and Mrs. James H. Hershman of Hampton, were always con- cerned about my education and made sacrifices to provide it. My greatest debt, however, is to my wife, Deborah. A relentless foe of split infinitives and convoluted writing, she has edited and typed each draft and made innumerable cor- rections and suggestions in the interest of clear expression. I would like to thank her in the language she likes best. Zu meiner Frau, herzlichen Dank, fllr alles. All errors of fact or interpretation are, of course, my responsibility. CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter I. Black and White in Virginia Before 1954. ... 10 II. The Second Reconstruction Begins: Virginia Receives the Brown Decision 39 IIJ> Charting the Course of Compromise: The Moderates 69 IV. Delay and Division 101 V. Resistance Turns Massive 146 VI. The Path of Greatest Resistance 192 VII. Suppression of White Dissent 233 VIII. The Public Schools Imperiled 271 TV Massive Resistance Meets its Match 320 X. Moderation and Adaptation 371 EPILOGUE 416 BIBLIOGRAPHY 423 MAPS AND TABLES Preceding Map Page Virginia Counties, Principal Cities, Mountains, and Rivers (1950) 10 Tables I. Black Population Percentages in Virginia Counties and Independent Cities (1950) ... 10 II. School Enrollment in Virginia: Total Enrollment 1955-1956 10 "There's a worrisome suspicion among the best people down in Virginia that the social revolution is about to catch up with them at last. Whether it's the psychological aftermath of war eWorld War II, that is); the pernicious and cumulative influence of the New Deal, or even perhaps a delayed reaction to that faintly disreputable old free- thinker, Tom Jefferson, a rather disconcerting change seems to impend and Virginians are facing the prospect with mixed emotions." Cabel Phillips (1949)* "Of all the American states, Virginia can lay claim to the most thorough control by an oligarchy. Political power has been closely held by a small group of leaders who, them- selves and their predecessors, have subverted democratic institutions and deprived most Virginians of a voice in their government. The Commonwealth possesses characteristics more akin to those of England at about the time of the Reform Bill of 1832 than to those of any other state of the present- day South. It is a political museum piece." ---V. 0. Key, Jr. (1949)** *"New Rumblings in the Old Dominion," New York Times Magazine June 19, 1949, p. 10. ^ ' **Southern Politics in State and Nat ion (New York, 1949), p. 19. Introduct ion For five years after the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown de- cision, Virginia prevented enforcement of the ruling in the state's public schools by delay and by outright defiance. Under the sway of its most conservative elements, the polit- ically dominant Byrd Organization led the campaign of defiance called massive resistance. Most studies of this turbulent and crucial era have focused on those who formulated and sought to carry out the massive resistance program. No one has yet told the story of those who were on the other side. This is such a study--of the diverse people and organizations that opposed massive resistance. An analysis of the opponents, I believe, gives a different perspective on the period and pro- vides an illuminating look at those who advocated or, at least, accepted change during the initial reaction to the momentous Brown ruling. The issue of public school desegregation and massive re- sistance to it thoroughly dominated Virginia's public life from the Brown decision until 1960.
Recommended publications
  • The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - College of Education & Professional Studies Urban Education (Darden) Winter 1991 The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis Alexander Stewart Leidholdt Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Education Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Race and Ethnicity Commons Recommended Citation Leidholdt, Alexander S.. "The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis" (1991). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, , Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/tb1v-f795 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds/119 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Education & Professional Studies (Darden) at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - Urban Education by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT NEWSPAPER'S ROLE IN MODERATING NORFOLK, VIRGINIA'S 1958 SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CRISIS by Alexander Stewart Leidholdt B.A. May 1978, Virginia Wesleyan College M.S. May 1980, Clarion University Ed.S. December 1984, Indiana University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion Unversity in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY URBAN SERVICES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December, 1991 Approved By: Maurice R. Berube, Dissertation Chair Concentration Area^TFlrector ember Dean of the College of Education Member Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • William F. Winter and the Politics of Racial Moderation in Mississippi
    WILLIAM WINTER AND THE POLITICS OF RACIAL MODERATION 335 William F. Winter and the Politics of Racial Moderation in Mississippi by Charles C. Bolton On May 12, 2008, William F. Winter received the Profile in Courage Award from the John F. Kennedy Foundation, which honored the former Mississippi governor for “championing public education and racial equality.” The award was certainly well deserved and highlighted two important legacies of one of Mississippi’s most important public servants in the post–World War II era. During Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s presentation of the award, he noted that Winter had been criticized “for his integrationist stances” that led to his defeat in the gubernatorial campaign of 1967. Although Winter’s opponents that year certainly tried to paint him as a moderate (or worse yet, a liberal) and as less than a true believer in racial segregation, he would be the first to admit that he did not advocate racial integration in 1967; indeed, much to his regret later, Winter actually pandered to white segregationists in a vain attempt to win the election. Because Winter, over the course of his long career, has increasingly become identified as a champion of racial justice, it is easy, as Senator Kennedy’s remarks illustrate, to flatten the complexity of Winter’s evolution on the issue CHARLES C. BOLTON is the guest editor of this special edition of the Journal of Mississippi History focusing on the career of William F. Winter. He is profes- sor and head of the history department at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report and Working Papers of the Twenty-Second Seminar On
    H. , . BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY PROVO. UTAH 8S 12- 11 THE MULTIFACETED ROLE OF THE LATIN AMERICAN SUBJECT SPECIALIST Final Report and Working Papers of the Twenty -second Seminar on the Acquisition of Latin American Library Materials University of Florida Gainesville, Florida June 12-17, 1977 Anne H. Jordan Editor SALALM Secretariat Austin, Texas 1979 Copyright Q by SALAIM Inc. 1979 HAROLD B. LEE LIBRARY BRIGHAM YOUNG UK SITY PROvn iitau — — iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction vii PROGRAM AND RESOLUTIONS Program and Schedule of Activities 3 Resolutions 8 SUMMARY REPORTS OF THE SESSIONS Latin American Area Centers and Library Research Resources: A Challenge for Survival—Laurence Hallewell 13 User Education Programs : The Texas Experience —Mary Ferris Burns . 17 Archives and Data Banks —Richard Puhek 19 Politics and Publishing: The Cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile—Sammy Alzofon Kinard 20 The Latin American Specialist and the Collection: In-House Bibliography Models for a Guide to the Resources on Latin America in the Library—Dan C. Hazen 22 Problems in the Acquisition of Central American and Caribbean Material—Lesbia Varona U2 The Latin American Subject Specialist and Reference Service Karen A. Schmidt **3 Final General Session—Mina Jane Grothey 51 ANNUAL REPORTS TO SALALM A Bibliography of Latin American Bibliographies Daniel Raposo Cordeiro 59 Microfilming Projects Newsletter No. 19—Suzanne Hodgman 9o Report of the Bibliographical Activities of the Latin American, Portuguese and Spanish Division—Mary Ellis Kahler 108 Latin American Books: Average Costs for Fiscal Years 1973, 197 1*, 1975, and 1976—Robert C. Sullivan Ill Latin American Activities in the United Kingdom Laurence Hallewell 11^ — — — —— 1V Page Resources for Latin American Studies in Australia—National Library of Australia 119 Library Activities in the Caribbean Area 1976/77: Report to SALALM XXII—Alma T.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same-Sex Marriage Struggle
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications Winter 2012 The Terms of the Debate: Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same-Sex Marriage Struggle Mary Ziegler Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Mary Ziegler, The Terms of the Debate: Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same- Sex Marriage Struggle, 39 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 467 (2012), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/332 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE: LITIGATION, ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGIES, AND COALITIONS IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE STRUGGLE MARY ZIEGLER ABSTRACT Why, in the face of ongoing criticism, do advocates of same-sex marriage continue to pursue litigation? Recently, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, a challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage, and Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, a lawsuit challenging section three of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, have created divisive debate. Leading scholarship and commentary on the litigation of decisions like Perry and Gill have been strongly critical, predicting that it will produce a backlash that will undermine the same- sex marriage cause. These studies all rely on a particular historical account of past same-sex marriage decisions and their effect on political debate.
    [Show full text]
  • African American College Students' Perceptions of African American Agency During the Civil War
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2018 Victims, Victors, or Bystanders? African American College Students' Perceptions of African American Agency During the Civil War Stephanie L. Hooks Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5503 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VICTIMS, VICTORS, OR BYSTANDERS? AFRICAN AMERICAN COLLEGE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN AGENCY DURING THE CIVIL WAR A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Stephanie Hooks B.S., Virginia Union University, 1999 M.A., Virginia State University, 2004 Director: Gabriel Reich, Ph. D. Associate Professor, Department of Teaching and Learning School of Education Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to thank Dr. Gabriel Reich, my dissertation chair, for all of the support that you have given me over the years. Thank you for helping refine and narrow my focus. Without your support I would not have been able to finish. I am forever indebted to you. I would also like to thank the other committee members, Dr. Jesse Senechal, Dr. Adam Ewing, and Dr. Hillary Parkhouse, for all of your expertise and guidance. Thank you to the students who participated in this study and gave up their time to be interviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System
    Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges Volume 22 | Issue 2 Article 6 10-10-2019 Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System Richard A. Hodges Ed.D., Thomas Nelson Community College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry Part of the Higher Education Commons, History Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Hodges, R. A. (2019). Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 22 (2). Retrieved from https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/vol22/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ VCCS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inquiry: The ourJ nal of the Virginia Community Colleges by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ VCCS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hodges: Massive Resistance and the Origins of the VTCS MASSIVE RESISTANCE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE VIRGINIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM RICHARD A. HODGES INTRODUCTION In the summer of 1964, Dr. Dana B. Hamel, Director of the Roanoke Technical Institute in Roanoke, Virginia received a phone call that would change the course of Virginia higher education. The call was from Virginia Governor Albertis Harrison requesting Hamel serve as the Director of the soon to be established Department of Technical Education. The department, along with its governing board, would quickly establish a system of technical colleges located regionally throughout Virginia, with the first of those colleges opening their doors for classes in the fall of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Mason Williams, "The Civil War Centennial and Public Memory In
    Copyright. Mary Mason Williams and the Virginia Center for Digital History, University of Virginia. 2005. This work may not be published, duplicated, or copied for any purpose without permission of the author. It may be cited under academic fair use guidelines. The Civil War Centennial and Public Memory in Virginia Mary Mason Williams University of Virginia May 2005 1 Copyright. Mary Mason Williams and the Virginia Center for Digital History, University of Virginia. 2005. This work may not be published, duplicated, or copied for any purpose without permission of the author. It may be cited under academic fair use guidelines. On December 31, 1961, Harry Monroe, a Richmond area radio host for WRVA, described the tendency to look back on past events during his “Virginia 1961” broadcast: “One of man’s inherent characteristics is a tendency to look back. He embraces this tendency because its alternative is a natural reluctance to look forward. Man, for the most part, would prefer to remember what he has experienced, rather than to open a Pandora’s box of things he has yet to undergo.”1 In the same broadcast, Monroe and his partner Lon Backman described the commemorations and parades that took place on the streets of Richmond that year as part of the state’s official “look back” at the Civil War one hundred years later. The Civil War Centennial took place from 1961-1965 as the nation was beset with both international and domestic struggles, the most immediate of which for Virginians was the Civil Rights Movement, which challenged centuries of white supremacy and institutionalized segregation that had remained the social and cultural status quo since Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Bolling Contemporary Virginia Politics
    6/29/21 A DISCUSSION OF CONTEM PORARY VIRGINIA POLITICS —FROM BLUE TO RED AND BACK AGAIN” - THE RISE AND FALL OF THE GOP IN VIRGINIA 1 For the first 200 years of Virginia's existence, state politics was dominated by the Democratic Party ◦ From 1791-1970 there were: Decades Of ◦ 50 Democrats who served as Governor (including Democratic-Republicans) Democratic ◦ 9 Republicans who served as Governor Dominance (including Federalists and Whigs) ◦ During this same period: ◦ 35 Democrats represented Virginia in the United States Senate ◦ 3 Republicans represented Virginia in the United States Senate 2 1 6/29/21 ◦ Likewise, this first Republican majority in the Virginia General Democratic Assembly did not occur until Dominance – 1998. General ◦ Democrats had controlled the Assembly General Assembly every year before that time. 3 ◦ These were not your “modern” Democrats ◦ They were a very conservative group of Democrats in the southern tradition What Was A ◦ A great deal of their focus was on fiscal Democrat? conservativism – Pay As You Go ◦ They were also the ones who advocated for Jim Crow and Massive resistance up until the passage of the Civil Rights Act of in 1965 4 2 6/29/21 Byrd Democrats ◦ These were the followers of Senator Harry F. Byrd, a former Virginia Governor and U.S. Senator ◦ Senator Byrd’s “Byrd Machine” dominated and controlled Virginia politics for this entire period 5 ◦ Virginia didn‘t really become a competitive two-party state until Ơͥ ͣ ǝ, and the first real From Blue To competition emerged at the statewide level Red œ
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Massive Folly
    Undergraduate Research Journal at UCCS Volume 2.1, Spring 2009 Virginia’s “Massive Folly”: Harry Byrd, Prince Edward County, and the Front Line Laura Grant Dept. of History, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Abstract This paper examines the closure of public schools in Prince Edward County, Virginia from 1959- 1964 in an effort to avoid desegregation. Specifically, the paper traces the roots of the political actions which led to the closure and then-Governor Harry Byrd's role in Virginia's political machine at the time. The paper argues that it was Byrd's influence which led to the conditions that not only made the closure possible in Virginia, but encouraged the white citizens of Prince Edward County to make their stand. In September, 1959, the public schools in Prince Edward County, Virginia closed their doors to all students. While most white students were educated in makeshift private schools, the doors of public education remained closed until the Supreme Court ordered the schools to reopen in 1964. This drastic episode in Virginia’s history was a response to the public school integration mandated by the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954. Prince Edward County was not the only district in Virginia to take this action; it was merely the most extreme case of resistance after state laws banning integration were struck down as unconstitutional. Schools all over the state closed, most only temporarily, and the white community rallied to offer white students assistance to attend segregated private schools rather than face integration in a movement termed “Massive Resistance.” While this “Brown backlash” occurred all over the South, it was most prevalent in the Deep South.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia State Capitol and Capitol Square
    Virginia State Capitol and Capitol Square In 1779, the Virginia Legislature voted to move the capital from Williamsburg to Richmond. Until a permanent Capitol could be built, the Virginia General Assembly met in two wood-framed buildings at the corner of what is now 14th Street and Cary Street. With Richmond as the new capital, six squares of land were selected for the placement of permanent public buildings. In 1788, the Thomas Jefferson designed Capitol was considered finished enough to house the Virginia General Assembly. Jefferson’s Roman temple form building is the middle portion of the present-day Capitol. The original building was expanded in 1906 with the addition of two wings, and again in 2007 with an underground extension. The architecturally and historically important building is designated as a National Historic Landmark and tentatively listed as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO. The public area surrounding the Capitol was originally a weed-filled open square with informal lanes and footpaths. In 1816, the Virginia General Assembly hired French-born Maximilian Godefroy to lay out a formal park. Two years later, the newly landscaped grounds were enclosed by the cast- and wrought-iron fence still in place today, and this area eventually came to be called Capitol Square. While retaining aspects of Godefroy’s framework, Scottish-born John Notman developed an 1850 overlay plan of meandering walkways and native trees and shrubs that gave Capitol Square much of the character and appeal it retains today. This designed historic landscape is nationally significant. Broad Street 12th Street Patrick Henry Building General Assembly Building Old City Hall Originally the Virginia State Library and Originally the Life Insurance Company of Built: 1887-94 Archives and the Virginia Supreme Court Virginia Building Now State Owned Designed: 1912 Built: 1938-40 Additions: 1922, 1955, 1964 Ninth Street Public Safety Memorial Darden Garden Capitol Street Steps Morson’s St.
    [Show full text]
  • In the SUPREME COURT of APPEALS of VIRGINIA at Richmond
    RULE 14-BRIEFS 1. Form and content& of appellant's brief. The ope11ing brief of the aJJpellanl ( or pet1t1011 for appeal when adopted as the opening brieci) shall comain: (a) A subject index and table oi citations with cases al11hal.Hotically arranged. l itation; Virginia .. a~es must refer to the Virginia Reports and, in addition. may rde, tu other ,orts cr,ntammg such cases. (h) A brief statement of the material proceedings in the lower court the errors assigned, d tl«· questions in\'oh-ed in the apJJeaL ' (c) A clear and concise statement of the iacts, with . eferences to the pages of the n'co:-d ,ere there is any possibility that t11e other side may question t11e statement Where the fact, , controve ed it should be so stated. (d) Argument in support of the position of appellant. The brief shall be signed by at least one attorney practicing in this court, giving his addr~ss . 7'he appellant may adopt the petition for appeal as his opening l:,riet by so sratiug in thr t1t1on, or by giving to opposing counsel written notice of such intt:ntion within five <lays of : receipt by appellant of the printed record, and by filing a copy of such notice with the rk of the court. No alleged error not specified in the or,cning brief or petition for appeal ill be admitted as a ground for argument by appellant on the hearing of the cause. 2. Form and contents of appellee'1 brief. The brief for the appellee shall contain: (a) A subject index and table of citations with cases alphabetically arranged.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude A. Swanson of Virginia: a Political Biography
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1985 Claude A. Swanson of Virginia: A Political Biography Henry C. Ferrell Jr. East Carolina University Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Ferrell, Henry C. Jr., "Claude A. Swanson of Virginia: A Political Biography" (1985). Political History. 14. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/14 Claude A. Swanson Claude A. Swanson of Virginia A Political Biography HENRY C. FERRELL, Jr. THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this book has been assisted by a grant from East Carolina University Copyright© 1985 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine College, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Club, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0024 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ferrell, Henry C., 1934- Claude A. Swanson of Virginia. Bibliography: p. Includes index. I. Swanson, Claude Augustus, 1862-1939. 2. Legislators -United States-Biography. 3. United States. Congress­ Biography. 4. Virginia---Governors-Biography. I. Title. E748.S92F47 1985 975.5'042'0924 [B] 84-27031 ISBN: 978-0-8131-5243-1 To Martha This page intentionally left blank Contents Illustrations and Photo Credits vm Preface 1x 1.
    [Show full text]