DOCSLIB.ORG

A6-0054/2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A6-0054/2005 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document FINAL A6-0054/2005 1.4.2005 * and ***I REPORT 1. on the proposal for a Council directive on a specific procedure for admitting third-country nationals for purposes of scientific research (COM(2004)0178 – C6-0011/2004 – 2004/0061(CNS)) 2. on the proposal for a Council recommendation to facilitate the admission of third-country nationals to carry out scientific research in the European Community (COM(2004)0178 – C6-0012/2004 – 2004/0062(CNS)) 3. on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council recommendation to facilitate the issue by the Member States of uniform short-stay visas for researchers from third countries travelling within the European Community for the purpose of carrying out scientific research (COM(2004)0178 – C6-0013/2004 – 2004/0063(CNS)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Vincent Peillon RR\562043EN.doc PE 350.188v03-00 EN EN PR_CNS_title4am PR_COD_1am Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast **I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast **II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position *** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty ***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast ***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position ***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission) Amendments to a legislative text In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version). These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned. PE 350.188v03-00 2/57 RR\562043EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page 1. DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION............................. 5 2. DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION........................... 19 3. DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION........................... 22 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 25 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY............ 29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY............ 44 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY............ 48 PROCEDURE .......................................................................................................................... 52 RR\562043EN.doc 3/57 PE 350.188v03-00 EN PE 350.188v03-00 4/57 RR\562043EN.doc EN 1. DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the proposal for a Council directive on a specific procedure for admitting third- country nationals for purposes of scientific research (COM(2004)0178 – C6-0011/2004 – 2004/0061(CNS)) (Consultation procedure) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission proposal (COM(2004)0178)1, – having regard to Article 63(3)(a) and (4) of the EC Treaty, – having regard to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0011/2004), – having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0054/2005), 1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended; 2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty; 3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; 5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Recital 4 (4) The number of researchers which the (4) The number of researchers which the Community will need to meet the target set Community will need by 2010 to meet the by the Barcelona European Council of 3% target set by the Barcelona European of GDP invested in research is estimated at Council of 3% of GDP invested in research 700 000. This target must be met through a is estimated at 700 000. This target must be 1 OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. RR\562043EN.doc 5/57 PE 350.188v03-00 EN series of interlocking measures such as met through a series of interlocking making scientific careers more attractive to measures such as making scientific careers young people, extending the opportunities more attractive to young people, for training and mobility in research, promoting women's involvement in improving the career prospects for scientific research, extending the researchers in the Community and opening opportunities for training and mobility in the Community up to third-country research, improving the career prospects nationals who could potentially be for researchers in the Community and admitted for research purposes. opening the Community up to third- country nationals who could potentially be admitted for research purposes. Justification The number of female researchers is still far lower (less than 50% Community-wide) than that of male researchers, particularly in the field of science, despite the fact that among people under 30 years of age there are more female than male graduates. Women are hampered by barriers that need to be combated in order to ensure that they are better represented in scientific posts and decision-making bodies. Amendment 2 Recital 5 (5) This Directive is intended to contribute (5) This Directive is intended to contribute to achieving these goals by fostering the to achieving these goals by fostering the admission and mobility for research admission and mobility for research purposes of third-country nationals for stays purposes of third-country nationals for stays of more than three months, in order to make of more than three months, in order to make the Community more attractive to the Community more attractive to researchers from around the world and to researchers from around the world, boost its position as an international centre especially those with the highest for research. qualifications, and to boost its position as an international centre for research. Justification If the EU is to compete successfully with its main competitors on the world stage in the field of research, it will have to create conditions that will motivate highly qualified scientists from the US and other non-European countries to carry out their research activities in Europe. Amendment 3 Recital 12 (12) It is important to foster the mobility of (12) It is important to foster the mobility of researchers as a means of developing and third-country nationals admitted for the PE 350.188v03-00 6/57 RR\562043EN.doc EN consolidating contacts and networks purposes of carrying out scientific research between partners at world level. in the European Union as a means of developing and consolidating contacts and networks between partners and establishing the role of the European Research Area (ERA) at world level. Justification It is essential to stress the importance of mobility and the necessary link to the European Research Area. The latter has to 'earn' its role and meaning at world level and has to be seen as a pole for quality research. Amendment 4 Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Given that family reunification is an essential factor in - and may indeed by a precondition for - mobility among researchers, it should be made easier for researchers' families to join them, so as to maintain family unity. Justification Family reunification is an extremely important factor for researchers from third countries who are planning to settle in Europe. Difficulties involved in bringing their families over are a major obstacle to researchers’ mobility and may lead them to opt for a different destination. It is therefore essential to make it easier for family members of researchers admitted into the European Union to enter the territory and reside there. Amendment 5 Recital 14 a (new) (14a) In view of the restrictions on access to the labour market affecting some EU citizens during existing transitional periods, full exemption from these restrictions should be sought for researchers who go to other EU Member States in order to carry out research. Justification The Directive could lead to less favourable treatment of EU citizens - namely researchers RR\562043EN.doc 7/57 PE 350.188v03-00 EN from the new Member States - compared to third country nationals. It is therefore necessary to express the hope that Member States which have chosen to introduce restrictions on access to their labour markets (this also includes certain 'new' Member States which have introduced restrictions against the 'old' States under the principle of reciprocity) will exempt researchers going to other EU States to carry out research work from these
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document FINAL A6-0365/2005 28.11.2005 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the retention of data processed in connection with the provision of public electronic communication services and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (COM(2005)0438 – C6-0293/2005 – 2005/0182(COD)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Alexander Nuno Alvaro RR\591654EN.doc PE 364.679v02-00 EN EN PR_COD_1am Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast **I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast **II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position *** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty ***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast ***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position ***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission.) Amendments to a legislative text In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
    [Show full text]
  • Tätigkeitsbericht 2001-03
    Tätigkeitsbericht 2001 – 2003 Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam e. V. Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam e.V. Am Neuen Markt 1 D-14467 Potsdam Tel.: +49-331-28991-0 Fax: +49-331-28991-40 Direktoren: Prof. Dr. Konrad H. Jarausch Prof. Dr. Christoph Kleßmann (bis Februar 2004) Stellv. Direktor: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Martin Sabrow (seit März 2004) Redaktion: Dr. Hans-Hermann Hertle Homepage: www.zzf-pdm.de 2 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Vorwort 5 1. Personal 7 2. Gremien 8 3. Rahmenprojekt „Die DDR im deutschen und europäischen Systemkonflikt“ 10 4. Weitere Drittmittel- und Kooperationsprojekte 25 5. Gesamtübersicht über die Forschungsprojekte 32 6. Gastwissenschaftler 35 7. Institutskolloquien 38 8. Science goes Public – Die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit 39 9. Veranstaltungen 42 10. Das ZZF im Internet 63 11. Kooperationsbeziehungen 65 12. Bibliothek 73 13. Presseausschnittarchiv 75 14. Publikationen 77 15. Vorträge 111 16. Lehrveranstaltungen 147 17. Ausblick: Das ZZF-Forschungsprogramm 2004/2005 153 3 VORWORT Abweichend von den früher jährlich vorgestellten Bilanzen erlaubt der hier vorgelegte zusammenfassende Tätigkeitsbericht des Zentrums für Zeithistorische Forschung für die Jahre 2001 bis 2003 einen Rückblick auf eine längerfristige Entwicklung in der neuen und vorletzten Projektphase des GWZ-Förderpro- gramms der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Zugleich deutet er Perspekti- ven für die künftige Schwerpunktsetzung des Zentrums an. In deutlichem Kontrast zur allgemeinen wirtschaftlichen Konjunktur verzeich- nete das ZZF im wissenschaftlichen Bereich ein kontinuierliches quantitatives und qualitatives Wachstum. Die Zahl der Mitarbeiter ist nach der Bewilligung von mehr als 30 Projekten durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, die Fritz Thyssen Stiftung, die Gerda Henkel Stiftung, die Volkswagen-Stiftung sowie die Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung und die Stiftung Aufarbeitung der SED- Diktatur auf 32 angewachsen.
    [Show full text]
  • Latinoamericana (Euro-Lat)
    CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES GILBERTO BOSQUES Reuniones de Mesa Directiva, Comisiones Permanentes y Grupo de Trabajo Migración de la Asamblea Parlamentaria Euro- Latinoamericana (Euro -Lat) . Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá, 16-19 de marzo de 2015. Serie EUROPA 61 Reuniones de Mesa Directiva, Comisiones Permanentes y Grupo de Trabajo Migración de la Asamblea Parlamentaria Euro-Latinoamericana (Euro-Lat) 16 al 19 de marzo de 2015 Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá Serie Europa No. 61 1 2 Reuniones de Mesa Directiva, Comisiones Permanentes y Grupo de Trabajo Migración de la Asamblea Parlamentaria Euro-Latinoamericana (EURO-LAT) ÍNDICE 1. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO. 7 2. INFORMACIÓN GENERAL. 13 Embajada de México en Panamá Tipo de Cambio Clima Hoteles 3. PERFILES 15 Dip. Elías Ariel Castillo González, Presidente del Parlamento 17 Latinoamericano. Dip. Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Co-Presidente del Componente 19 Europeo de la Asamblea Euro-Lat. Dip. Leonel Búcaro, Co-Presidente del Componente Latinoamericano 21 de la Asamblea Euro-Lat. Sr. Juan Carlos Varela Rodríguez, Presidente de la República de 22 Panamá. Sra. Isabel de Saint Malo de Alvarado, Vicepresidenta y Ministra de 23 Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Panamá. Dip. Adolfo Valderrama Rodríguez, Presidente de la Asamblea 24 Nacional de Panamá. Sr. Milton Henríquez, Ministro de Gobierno de Panamá. 25 Lic. Rafael Pino Pinto, Gobernador de la Provincia de Panamá. 26 Lic. José I. Blandón. Presidente Municipal de Panamá. 27 4. AGENDA Proyecto de Programa (versión 11 de marzo de 2015). 29 5. MESAS DE TRABAJO DE LAS COMISIONES PARLAMENTARIAS 35 PERMANENTES DE LA ASAMBLEA PARLAMENTARIA EURO- LATINOAMERICANA Comisión de Asuntos Políticos, de Seguridad y de Derechos 37 Humanos.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • En En ***I Report
    2009 - 2014 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Plenary sitting A7-9999/2013 3.7.2013 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (COM(2012)0131 – C7-0086/2012 – 2012/0061(COD)) Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur: Danuta Jazłowiecka RR\498030EN.doc PE498.030v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_COD_1amCom Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act In amendments by Parliament, amendments to draft acts are highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the draft act which may require correction when the final text is prepared – for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a language version. Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned. The heading for any amendment to an existing act that the draft act seeks to amend includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Passages in an existing act that Parliament wishes to amend, but that the draft act has left unchanged, are highlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in such passages are indicated thus: [...].
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 6 April 2011
    C 176 E/58 EN Official Journal of the European Union 16.6.2011 Wednesday 6 April 2011 MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 6 APRIL 2011 (2011/C 176 E/03) Contents Page 1. Opening of the sitting . 63 2. Documents received . 63 3. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 63 4. Governance and partnership in the single market - Single market for Europeans - Single market for enterprises and growth - Public procurement (debate) . 63 5. Announcement by the President . 64 6. Governance and partnership in the single market - Single market for Europeans - Single market for enterprises and growth - Public procurement (continuation of debate) . 64 7. Request for the waiver of parliamentary immunity . 65 8. Voting time . 66 8.1. Draft amending budget No 1/2011 - Section III - Commission (Rule 138) (vote) . 66 8.2. Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund - Floods in 2010 in Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Croatia and Romania (Rule 138) (vote) . 66 8.3. EC-Comoros fisheries agreement *** (Rule 138) (vote) . 66 8.4. Dispute settlement mechanism under the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the EC and Jordan *** (Rule 138) (vote) . 67 8.5. EU-Morocco agreement establishing a dispute settlement mechanism *** (Rule 138) (vote) . 67 8.6. Dispute settlement mechanism under the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the EC and Egypt *** (Rule 138) (vote) . 67 8.7. Participation of Ukraine in Union programmes *** (Rule 138) (vote) . 68 8.8. Imports from Greenland of fishery products * (Rule 138) (vote) . 68 8.9. Granting and withdrawing international protection ***I (vote) . 68 8.10. European statistics on tourism ***I (vote) .
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Ecosystems Ecosystems Innovation Regional
    QG-01-16-501-EN-C This book is produced by the Members of the European Committee of the Regions in close collaboration with Europe's cities and regions. The book is all about pioneering cities and regions - or reviewing the content of the book from activities CoR perspective: about regional innovation ecosystems. guide In recent years it has increasingly become apparent that only through sharing knowledge and working in partnership it is possible to st create truly competitive and sustainable economies meeting the needs of the 21 century. In order to achieve this, the European Union Ecosystems Innovation Regional can and must work with and for our citizens. For this to happen we need to achieve a change in mindset. This publication therefore seeks to stimulate bench-learning between regions and cities, sparking new ideas and fundamentally stirring economic development. Presenting some of the most inspiring projects across the EU, this book oers readers an opportunity to understand and explore how Europe's cities and regions are breaking new ground in regional development. The European Committee of the Regions is the EU's Assembly of 350 regional and local representatives from all 28 Member States, representing over 507 million Europeans. This book is an essential part of the process of implementing our political priorities for 2015-2020 and giving Europe's citizens the fresh start they need. In order to overcome its current challenges, Europe must establish a culture of co-creation and break its boundaries by moving towards entrepreneurial discovery, open innovation, experimentation and ISBN: 978-92-895-0876-6 action.
    [Show full text]
  • 1130 1 MINUTES Meeting of 30 November 2010, from 15:00 to 18
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Transport and Tourism TRAN_PV(2010)1130_1 MINUTES Meeting of 30 November 2010, from 15:00 to 18:30, 1 December 2010, from 9:00 to 12:30 and from 15:00 to 18:30, and 2 December 2010, from 9:00 to 12:30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15:10 on Tuesday 30 November 2010, with Brian Simpson, Chairman, in the chair. * * * Tuesday, 30 November 2010, 15.10 – 18.30 1. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. 2. Approval of minutes of meetings of: 26-27 October 2010 PV – PE450.946v01-00 8-9 November 2010 PV – PE452.654v01-00 The minutes of meetings of 26-27 October and 8-9 November 2010 were approved. 3. Europe, the world's No 1 tourist destination – a new political framework for tourism in Europe TRAN/7/03812 2010/2206(INI) COM(2010)0352 Rapporteur: Carlo Fidanza (PPE) Responsible: TRAN – Opinions: EMPL – Decision: no opinion PV\840975EN.doc PE454.420v01-00 EN United in diversity EN ENVI – Decision: no opinion ITRE – Jorgo Chatzimarkakis (ALDE) IMCO – Jürgen Creutzmann (ALDE) REGI – Salvatore Caronna (S&D) AGRI – Rareş-Lucian Niculescu (PPE) CULT – Hella Ranner (PPE) PA – PE450.607v02-00 AM – PE452.684v01-00 Exchange of views Speakers: Carlo Fidanza, Spyros Danellis, Giommaria Uggias, Frieda Brepoels, Hella Ranner, Georges Bach, Michael Cramer, Michel Dantin, Silvia- Adriana Ţicău, Jim Higgins, Brian Simpson, Francesc Tudini (EC). 4. Report 2010 on the implementation of the Cohesion Policy programmes for 2007- 2013 TRAN/7/03599 2010/2139(INI) COM(2010)0110 Draftsman: Jaromír Kohlíček (GUE/NGL) PA – PE450.650v01-00 Responsible: REGI – Miroslav Mikolášik (PPE) DT – PE450.670v01-00 Consideration of draft opinion Speakers: Brian Simpson, Ville Itälä, Saïd El Khadraoui, Eva Lichtenberger, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Riquet, Mathieu Grosch, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Michael Cramer.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, March 4 , 2015 SUBJECT: the Case of Raif Badawi and Other Prisoners of Conscience in Saudi Arabia Madam High Repre
    Brussels, March 4th, 2015 SUBJECT: The case of Raif Badawi and other prisoners of conscience in Saudi Arabia Madam High Representative, We are again writing to you regarding the case of Raif Badawi, Saudi prisoner of conscience, currently held in detention by the Saudi authorities, after having been convicted by the Criminal Court of Jeddah. We remain deeply concerned about the possible developments in his case. We have been informed by multiple sources that Mr. Badawi may be subjected again in the near future to a new trial, this time for apostasy, and that he faces, if found guilty by the Criminal Court, the risk of being convicted to the death penalty. We, therefore, urge you to employ all your best efforts to call on the authorities of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the release of Raif Badawi, his lawyer Walled Abulkhair who is also imprisoned and of all other prisoners of conscience. Raif Badawi’s alleged crime was to use his freedom of expression, which is an international human right that Saudi Arabia is bound to respect. We understand that Saudi Arabia is deemed an important partner to the European Union, both individually and in the context of EU’s relationship with the Gulf Cooperation Council. Nevertheless, we strongly believe that engagement with third countries must be based on the upholding of international law, namely, international human rights law, and Saudi Arabia is no exception to that. The moment has come, especially now with a new Saudi leadership, for the EU to send a clear message to the Saudi authorities demanding that it respects, protects and fulfills international human rights, releases all prisoners of conscience and revokes all institutionalized practices that actively infringe fundamental freedoms in the Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaración Del Parlamento Europeo Sobre La Fibromialgia
    C 46 E/46 ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 24.2.2010 Martes, 13 de enero de 2009 Fibromialgia P6_TA(2009)0014 Declaración del Parlamento Europeo sobre la fibromialgia (2010/C 46 E/07) El Parlamento Europeo, — Visto el artículo 116 de su Reglamento, A. Considerando que cerca de 14 millones de personas en la Unión Europea y entre el 1 y el 3 % de la población mundial total sufre de fibromialgia, un síndrome debilitante que causa dolores crónicos generalizados, B. Considerando que, aunque la Organización Mundial de la Salud reconoció la fibromialgia como enfer­ medad ya en 1992, esta patología no está incluida en el índice oficial de patologías en la UE, lo cual impide a los pacientes obtener un diagnóstico oficial, C. Considerando que las personas que sufren de fibromialgia acuden con más frecuencia al médico de cabe­ cera, son remitidos con mayor frecuencia a especialistas, reciben más certificados de baja por enfermedad y son hospitalizados con mayor frecuencia, lo que genera una carga económica considerable para la UE, D. Considerando que los pacientes de fibromialgia tienen que luchar por llevar una vida plena e indepen­ diente, a menos que tengan acceso a un tratamiento y un apoyo adecuados, 1. Pide al Consejo y a la Comisión que: — desarrollen una estrategia comunitaria sobre la fibromialgia con objeto de que esta patología sea recono­ cido como enfermedad; — contribuyan a la sensibilización sobre esta patología y faciliten el acceso a la información para profesio­ nales y pacientes, apoyando las campañas de la UE y nacionales de sensibilización; — alienten a los Estados miembros a mejorar el acceso al diagnóstico y al tratamiento; — promuevan la investigación sobre la fibromialgia mediante los programas de trabajo del Séptimo Programa Marco de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico y futuros programas de investigación; — promuevan el desarrollo de programas para la recopilación de datos sobre la fibromialgia; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • De 26 Nederlanders in Het Europees Parlement 2
    De 26 Nederlanders in het Europees Parlement 2 Verklaring symbolen Telefoonnummer Brussel Telefoonnummers in Nederland en andere lidstaten GSM GSM Brussel Informatie in deze brochure is bijgewerkt tot februari 2013 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 3 Inhoudsopgave Biografieën 4 Contactgegevens Europarlementariërs 17 Voorlichters 21 Parlementaire commissies 23 Hoe werkt het Europees Parlement? 25 Zetelverdeling 26 Bezoeken 27 Adressen 28 Vergaderdata 29 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 4 In dit boekje vindt u de namen en contactgegevens van de 26 Nederlandse leden van het Europees Parlement. De Europarlementariërs van het CDA maken deel uit CDA van de fractie van de Europese Volkspartij (Christen- Democraten) (EVP) Wim van de Camp (delegatieleider) Geboren 27-07-1953 te Oss. Hogere Landbouwschool voor Tropische Landbouw en studie Rechten aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. Juridisch beleidsmedewerker bij de VNG (1982-1986). Lid van de Tweede Kamer (1986 -2009). Lid van het EP sinds 2009. Lid van de Commissie burgerlijke vrijheden, justitie en binnenlandse zaken. Plv. lid van de Commissie interne markt en consumentenbescherming. Plv. lid van de Bijzondere Commissie georganiseerde misdaad, corruptie en witwassen. Plv. lid van de Subcommissie mensenrechten. Lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met de Volksrepubliek China. Plv. lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met Albanië, Bosnië-Herzegovina, Servië, Montenegro en Kosovo. Esther de Lange Geboren 19-02-1975 te Spaubeek. Studie Hogere Europese Beroepsopleiding en Internationale Betrekkingen. Projectmedewerker FEANTSA (Europese federatie van dak- en thuislozenorganisaties) (1997). Medewerker Europese zaken twee Duitse brancheverenigingen (1998-1999). Beleidsmedewerker Europarlementariër (1999-2007). Voorzitter werkveldcommissie Hogere Europese Beroepen Opleiding, Hogeschool Zuyd, Maastricht (sinds 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market FINAL 2003/0270(CNS) 23 February 2004 OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market for the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs on the proposal for a Council framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant for obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters (COM(2003) 688 – C5-0609/2003 – 2003/0270(CNS)) Draftsman: Giuseppe Gargani AD\524999EN.rtf PE 338.492 EN EN PA_Leg PE 338.492 2/5 AD\524999EN.rtf EN PROCEDURE The Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market appointed Giuseppe Gargani draftsman at its meeting of 1 December 2003. It considered the draft opinion at its meetings of 27 January and 19 February 2004. At the latter meeting it adopted, by 15 votes to 11, with no abstentions, an amendment calling on the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs to reject the framework decision. The following were present for the vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman and draftsman), Willi Rothley (vice-chairman), Ioannis Koukiadis (vice-chairman), Bill Miller (vice-chairman), Paolo Bartolozzi, Maria Berger, Janelly Fourtou, Marie-Françoise Garaud, Evelyne Gebhardt, José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Malcolm Harbour, Lord Inglewood, Hans Karlsson (for Fiorella Ghilardotti), Carlos Lage (for Carlos Candal pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Manuel Medina Ortega, Angelika Niebler (for Bert Doorn), Anne-Marie Schaffner, Astrid Thors (for Diana Wallis), Marianne L.P. Thyssen, Ian Twinn (for Rainer Wieland), Joachim Wuermeling and Stefano Zappalà.
    [Show full text]