Cladistics
Cladistics 27 (2011) 559–580 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00352.x
A phylogenetic analysis of morphological and molecular characters of Lithospermum L. (Boraginaceae) and related taxa: evolutionary relationships and character evolution
James I. Cohen*
Department of Biology and Chemistry, Texas A&M International University, LBVSC 379E, 5201 University Blvd, Laredo, TX 78041, USA Accepted 12 January 2011
Abstract
Lithospermum (Boraginaceae) includes ca. 60 species and exhibits a wide range of floral, palynological, and vegetative diversity. Phylogenetic analyses based on 10 chloroplast DNA regions and 22 morphological characters were conducted in order to (i) examine evolutionary relationships within Lithospermum and among related genera of Boraginaceae, and (ii) investigate patterns of morphological evolution. Several morphological features, such as long-funnelform corollas, faucal appendages, reciprocal herkogamy, and evident secondary leaf venation, have evolved multiple times within the genus. In contrast, other morphological features, including the presence of glands and the position and number of pollen pores, are less plastic and tend to characterize larger clades. Some features, including the presence of glands, are interpreted as symplesiomorphic for Lithospermum, while others, such as evident secondary leaf venation, appear to have originated repeatedly. The range of structural diversity that occurs among the species of Lithospermum suggests the potential utility of this genus as a model for integrative studies of evolution, development, and molecular biology. The Willi Hennig Society 2011.
Lithospermum L., a genus in the family Boraginaceae, the other New World members of Lithospermeae, previ- comprises ca. 60 species, with a centre of diversity in ously placed in Lasiarrhenum I.M. Johnst., Macromeria Mexico and the south-western United States. Recently, D. Don, Nomosa I.M. Johnst., Onosmodium Michx., Cohen and Davis (2009) and Weigend et al. (2009) Perittostema I.M. Johnst., and Psilolaemus I.M. Johnst. reconstructed phylogenies of Lithospermum and related (Cohen and Davis, 2009). With this broader generic genera of Lithospermeae, the tribe to which Lithosper- circumscription, Lithospermum exhibits a wide range of mum belongs. Cohen and Davis (2009) utilized 10 floral, palynological, and vegetative diversity. chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) regions, and Weigend et al. In light of the broad range of structural diversity (2009) concatenated two cpDNA regions along with the among its species, Lithospermum may be a useful taxon nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS). Both in which to investigate character evolution. Some of these analyses resolved Lithospermum as non-mono- features, such as flowers with long-funnelform corollas phyletic, with members of related genera nested among its (> 4 cm in length) and exserted anthers and stigmas species. In light of these relationships, Cohen and Davis (termed Macromeria-type flowers), appear to have (2009) expanded the circumscription of Lithospermum, originated multiple times (Cohen and Davis, 2009). and under this broader interpretation the genus appears However, the phylogenetic distributions of other char- to be monophyletic. Lithospermum currently includes the acters, including type of herkogamy, pollen shape, and species that traditionally have been recognized as mem- pattern of leaf venation, remain unexamined. bers of the genus (Johnston, 1952, 1954a,b) as well as all The goals of the present study are twofold: (i) to reconstruct a phylogeny of Lithospermum (herein *Corresponding author: the ingroup) and other members of Lithospermeae E-mail address: [email protected] and Boraginaceae (herein the outgroup) through a