1. Energy, Economic and Electricity Information 1.1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM for PFBR BHAVINI, Kalpakkam
BHARATIYA NABHIKIYA VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED (A Government of India Enterprise) Kalpakkam – 603 102, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu. Tender No - BHAVINI/IT/08/111/10 Name of Work PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM FOR PFBR BHAVINI, Kalpakkam. BHARATIYA NABHIKIYA VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED (A Government of India Enterprise) Kalpakkam - 603 102, Kancheepuram Dist. (TN) Tender No: BHAVINI /IT/08/111/10 Submission of Tender upto Opening of Tender Date Tim e Date Time 03.12.2008 14:00 hrs 03.12.2008 15:00 hrs Important Notes: • Tender forms shall be signed at the appropriate places by the intending tenderers. • The tenderer shall submit their offer in original Tender documents without changing the Tender format which satisfies each and every condition laid down in the tender documents, failing which the tender is liable to be rejected. • Contractor shall furnish the unconditional bid undertaking failing which their tender shall be considered incomplete and liable for rejection summarily. • This tender document should be returned with all papers intact without detaching any part of it. Tender Issued to M/s. …………………………………………………. By …………………………………………………… BHARATIYA NABHIKIYA VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED (A Government of India Enterprise) Kalpakkam Name of the work: Design, material, construction features, engineering, manufacture, packing, transportation, delivery, unloading, safe storage, installation, testing, commissioning, training, documentation & guarantee of Public Address system for 500MWe Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor(PFBR) BHAVINI, Kalpakkam, Kancheepuram District, -
Rule India Andpakistansanctionsother 15 Cfrparts742and744 Bureau Ofexportadministration Commerce Department of Part II 64321 64322 Federal Register / Vol
Thursday November 19, 1998 Part II Department of Commerce Bureau of Export Administration 15 CFR Parts 742 and 744 India and Pakistan Sanctions and Other Measures; Interim Rule federal register 64321 64322 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 223 / Thursday, November 19, 1998 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of missile technology reasons have been Export Administration, Department of made subject to this sanction policy Bureau of Export Administration Commerce, P.O. Box 273, Washington, because of their significance for nuclear DC 20044. Express mail address: explosive purposes and for delivery of 15 CFR Parts 742 and 744 Sharron Cook, Regulatory Policy nuclear devices. [Docket No. 98±1019261±8261±01] Division, Bureau of Export To supplement the sanctions of Administration, Department of RIN 0694±AB73 § 742.16, this rule adds certain Indian Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania and Pakistani government, parastatal, India and Pakistan Sanctions and Avenue, NW, Room 2705, Washington, and private entities determined to be Other Measures DC 20230. involved in nuclear or missile activities FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to the Entity List in Supplement No. 4 AGENCY: Bureau of Export Eileen M. Albanese, Director, Office of to part 744. License requirements for Administration, Commerce. Exporter Services, Bureau of Export these entities are set forth in the newly ACTION: Interim rule. Administration, Telephone: (202) 482± added § 744.11. Exports and reexports of SUMMARY: In accordance with section 0436. -
Joint Statement on the Occasion of the 7Th India-Japan Energy Dialogue
Joint Statement on the occasion of the 7th India-Japan Energy Dialogue between the Planning Commission of India and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan 1. H.E. Mr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission of India and H.E. Mr. Toshimitsu Motegi, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan held the 7th meeting of the India-Japan Energy Dialogue on September 12, 2013 in New Delhi. 2. Senior officials of the relevant ministries and departments of both sides participated in the discussions. Both sides welcomed the progress achieved so far in the previous six rounds of the Energy Dialogue and in the deliberations of the various Working Groups. They appreciated the sector-specific discussions by experts of both sides and the progress made in various areas of cooperation. 3. During the dialogue, both sides recognized that it is important to hold the India-Japan Energy Dialogues annually, and that the issues of energy security and global environment are high priority challenges requiring continuous and effective action. In particular, to overcome challenges such as the global-scale changes in the energy demand structure seen in recent years and soaring energy prices, both sides confirmed to strengthen consumer-producer dialogue on LNG and deepen cooperation in energy conservation and renewable energy sectors. In addition, both sides decided to strengthen programs to further disseminate and expand model business projects that have thus far been implemented by both sides, and to enhance cooperation in upstream development of petroleum and natural gas. 4. Both sides recognized the need to promote industrial cooperation to expand bilateral energy cooperation on a commercial basis, based on the Joint Statement issued at the 6th India-Japan Energy Dialogue. -
February-2021 Executive Summary on Power Sector
भारत सरकार Government of India वि饍युत मंत्रालय Ministry of Power के न्द्रीय वि饍युत प्राधिकरण Central Electricity Authority Executive Summary on Power Sector February-2021 Executive Summary for the Month of February-2021 Contents SN Section A - Highlights of Power Sector Page 1 Electricity Generation for Feb-2021 (BU) 1A & 1B 2 Generating Capacity Addition for Feb-2021 (MW) 2 3 List of Projects Commissioned in Feb-2021 3 4 All India Installed Capacity (MW) Region-wise as on 28-02-2021 3 5 All India Installed Capacity (MW) Sector-wise as on 28-02-2021 4 6 Transmission Lines Added during Feb-2021 (Ckms) 5 7 Transformation Capacity Addition during Feb-2021 (MVA) 6 8 Power Supply Position (Energy & Peak) in Feb-2021 7 9 Peak Shortage of Power Supply (MW) in Different Regions 8-9 10 All India PLF Sector-wise for Feb-2021 10 11 T & D and AT & C Losses (%) 12 All India Village Electrification 11 13 Average cost of Power & Average Realisation 14 All India Coal consumption for Power Generation (MT) Section B - Capacity Addition 1 Capacity Addition Targets and Achievements in 12th Plan, 2017-18 , 2018-19 and 2019-20 12 2 Capacity Addition Targets & Achievements during Feb-2021 13 3 Installed Capacity in various Regions including their shares. 14-19 Section C - Transmission Lines 1 Programme and Achievements of Transmission Lines in Feb-2021 20 2 List of Transmission Lines Commissioned during Feb-2021 Section D - Sub Stations Programme and Achievements of Sub-Stations in Feb-2021 1 21 2 List of Sub Stations commissioned during Feb-2021 Section E -
Vice-Chancellor‟S Report
Vice-Chancellor‟s Report Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi founded by the philanthropist, industrialist Late Shri B.M. Birla in 1955, attained the status of a Deemed to be University in the year 1986. The rich legacy of the founder has been carried forward by his son Padma Bhushan Late Shri. G. P. Birla and his grandson, the present Chairman of our Board of Governors, Shri C. K. Birla through continued emphasis on academic excellence and contribution to nation building. BIT Mesra, by virtue of the quality of its academic programmes, has consistently been ranked amongst the leading technical Institutes of the country. The Institute offers academic programmes in 17 disciplines in the main Mesra campus and has 626 faculty members and over 12,000 students spread across various campuses The Institute has taken many initiatives to strengthen and expand the Teaching – Learning environment and to generate career opportunities for the students in reputed organizations. Some of these initiatives are the G P Birla Scholarship Scheme, Best Student‘s Project Award, Inter Hostel Indoor Sports Award and a strong campus placement programme. A brief report on salient activities of the Institute, undertaken during the year 2018-19 follows. 1. Board of Governors: Key decisions regarding development of the institute which were taken by the BOG are listed below. Revised UG and PG curricula conforming to Outcome-Based Education (OBE)/Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) and revised Ph.D. Ordinance have been made operational in the AY 18-19. 9 UG students participated in Immersive Summer Research Experience (ISRE) at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago and 3 at Carnegie Melon University (CMU) with equal sharing of expenses by BIT, BIT Mesra Alumni Association-North America (BITMAA-NA) and the participants The 7th CPC stands fully implemented. -
List of Abbreviations
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS S. No. 1. A&N Andaman & Nicobar 2. ACO Assistant Committee Officer 3. AEES Atomic Energy Education Society 4. AeBAS Aadhaar enabled Biometric Attendance System 5. AIIMS All India Institute of Medical Sciences 6. AIU Association of Indian Universities 7. AMC Annual Maintenance Contract 8. ARO Assistant Research Officer 9. ASEAN Association of South-East Asian Nations 10. ASGP Association of Secretaries-General of Parliaments 11. ASI Archaeological Survey of India 12. ASSOCHAM Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India 13. ATNs Action Taken Notes 14. ATRs Action Taken Reports 15. AWS Automatic Weather Station 16. AYCL Andrew Yule & Company Ltd. 17. AYUSH Ayurvedic, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy 18. BCD Basic Customs Duty 19. BEML Bharat Earth Movers Limited 20. BHAVINI Bhartiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Ltd. 21. BHEL Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. 22. BHMRC Bhopal Memorial Hospital & Research Centre 23. BIOS Bills Information Online System 24. BIS Bureau of Indian Standards 25. BMRCL Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. 26. BOAT Board of Apprentice Ship Training 27. BOB Bank of Baroda 28. BPCL Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited 29. BPST Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 30. BRO Border Roads Organisation 31. BSF Border Security Force 32. BSNL Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited 33. C&AG Comptroller & Auditor General 34. CARA Central Adoption Resource Authority 35. CAT Central Administrative Tribunal 36. CBI Central Bureau of Investigation 37. CBRN Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear 38. CBDT Central Board of Direct Taxes 39. CCL Child Care Leave 40. CCRYN Central Council for Research in Yoga and Naturopathy 41. CCS Central Civil Services 42. -
P.Chellapandi, P.Puthiyavinayagam, T.Jeyakumar S.Chetal and Baldev Raj Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research Kalpakkam - 603102
P.Chellapandi, P.Puthiyavinayagam, T.Jeyakumar S.Chetal and Baldev Raj Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research Kalpakkam - 603102 IAEA-Technical Meeting on ‘Design, Manufacturing and Irradiation Behavior of Fast Reactor Fuels’ 30 May-3 June 2011, IPPE, Russia Scope of Presentation Nuclear Power & FBR Programme in India Economic advantages of high burnups Int. experience on achieving high burnup Roadmap of enhancing the burnup Experience with carbide & oxide fuels Highlights of R&D Future Plans India’s Nuclear Roadmap 70000 • PHWRs from indigenous Uranium Nuclear Power Capacity • PHWRs from imported Uranium 60000 Projection (in MWe) • Imported LWR to the max. extent of 40 GW(e) 50000 • PHWRs from spent enriched U from LWRs 40000 (undersafeguard) 30000 • FBRs from reprocessed Pu and U from PHWR 20000 • FBRs from reprocessed Pu and U from LWR (undersafeguard) 10000 • U-233-Thorium Thermal / Fast Reactors 0 2010 2012 2017 2022 2032 • India has indigenous nuclear power program (4780 MW out of 20 reactors) and expects to have 20,000 MWe nuclear capacity on line by 2020 and 63,000 MWe by 2032. • Now, foreign technology and fuel are expected to boost India's nuclear power plans considerably. All plants will have high indigenous engineering content. • India has a vision of becoming a world leader in nuclear technology due to its expertise in fast reactors and thorium fuel cycle. FBR Programme in India • Indigenous Design & Construction Future FBR • Comprehensiveness in development of • 1000 MWe • Pool Type Design, R&D and Construction • Metallic fuel • High Emphasis on Scientific Breakthroughs • Serial constr. • Indegenous • Synthesis of Operating Experiences • Beyond 2025 • Synthesis of Emerging Concepts (Ex.GENIV) • Focus on National & International Weight in t No. -
Separating Indian Military and Civilian Nuclear Facilities
Separating Indian Military and Civilian Nuclear Facilities Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) By David Albright and Susan Basu December 19, 2005 The agreement announced on July 18, 2005 by President George Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh regarding the establishment of a U.S.-India “global partnership” will require changes to U.S. non-proliferation laws and policies and could dramatically increase nuclear and nuclear-related commerce with India. Part of this agreement is an Indian commitment to separate its civil and military nuclear programs and put declared civil facilities under international safeguards. Safeguards should apply in perpetuity, with minor, standard exceptions that do not include use in nuclear explosives or weapons. In addition, safeguarded nuclear material should not co-mingle with unsafeguarded nuclear material in any facility, unless this unsafeguarded nuclear material also comes under safeguards. This latter condition is an example of “contamination,” a key principle of safeguards. Although these conditions do not appear to have been accepted by India, they are necessary to prevent civil nuclear cooperation from benefiting India’s nuclear weapons program. To accomplish these goals, India needs to place all its nuclear facilities not directly associated with nuclear weapons production or deployment under safeguards. India has many civil nuclear facilities in this category. In addition, India should place its nuclear facilities associated with its naval nuclear fuel cycle under international safeguards. Exempting such naval-related facilities from safeguards would undermine efforts to safeguard such facilities in non-nuclear weapon states party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Brazil accepted safeguards on its prototype naval reactor and its enrichment plants at Aramar dedicated to the production of naval reactor fuel. -
Nuclear Security: a Fortnightly Newsletter from Caps
NUCLEAR SECURITY: A FORTNIGHTLY NEWSLETTER FROM CAPS NUCLEAR SECURITY: A FORTNIGHTLY NEWSLETTER FROM CAPS Vol 11, No. 15, 01 JUNE 2017 OPINION – Manpreet Sethi Nuclear India at 19: Keep Focus Right on CONTENTS Deterrence OPINION NUCLEAR STRATEGY India completes 19 years as a nuclear armed state BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE this month. This period is no more than an eye blink in the life of a nation, but India has made NUCLEAR ENERGY significant progress towards operationalisation NUCLEAR COOPERATION of its deterrence capability (it was on May 11 URANIUM PRODUCTION and 13, 1998 that India conducted nuclear tests NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION at the Pokhran range in Rajasthan. India has since NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT declared a moratorium on testing). NUCLEAR SAFETY It has worked according to a plan in the form of a NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT nuclear doctrine that it gave to itself in August 1999, and which was formalised, with largely the same attributes as mentioned in the draft, by the But it seeks to deter the adversary from making government of the day in January 2003. this move by holding up for him the prospect of massive retaliation which The doctrine defined a India has eschewed the first use of would negate any benefit narrow role for India’s nuclear weapons, leaving it to the of his action. This is a nuclear weapons — only adversary to take the difficult decision purely deterrence doctrine, for deterrence against of making the first nuclear move. But and that really is the only nuclear weapons of the it seeks to deter the adversary from purpose of nuclear adversary. -
Expenditure Budget Vol. I, 2015-2016
Expenditure Budget Vol. I, 2015-2016 49 STATEMENT 14 PLAN INVESTMENT IN PUBLIC ENTERPRISES (In crores of Rupees) Actuals 2013-2014 Budget 2014-2015 Revised 2014-2015 Budget 2015-2016 S.No. Name of Enterprise/Undertaking Total Plan Budget Support Total Plan Budget Support Total Plan Budget Support Total Plan Budget Support Outlay Outlay Outlay Outlay Equity Loans Equity Loans Equity Loans Equity Loans Ministry of Agriculture 24.66 ... 24.66 ... ... ... 10.00 ... 10.00 12.00 ... 12.00 Department of Agriculture and Cooperation 24.66 ... 24.66 ... ... ... 10.00 ... 10.00 12.00 ... 12.00 1. Land Development Banks 24.66 ... 24.66 ... ... ... 10.00 ... 10.00 12.00 ... 12.00 Department of Atomic Energy 5068.14 329.60 ... 8320.62 371.00 422.00 6860.73 158.50 319.00 10045.92 418.00 422.00 2. Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Limited 289.60 289.60 ... 440.00 40.00 400.00 354.63 ... 300.00 440.00 40.00 400.00 (BHAVINI) 3. Electonics Corporation of India Limited 39.28 ... ... 27.50 ... ... 27.50 ... ... 25.00 ... ... 4. Indian Rare Earths Limited 22.09 ... ... 65.70 ... ... 67.80 ... ... 65.14 ... ... 5. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited 4675.73 ... ... 7446.42 181.00 22.00 6227.50 72.50 19.00 9095.00 178.00 22.00 (NPCIL) 6. Uranium Corporation of India Limited 41.44 40.00 ... 341.00 150.00 ... 183.30 86.00 ... 420.78 200.00 ... Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, ... ... ... 8.60 8.60 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH) 7. Homeopathic Medicines Pharmaceutical Co. -
India's Stocks of Civil and Military Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium, End 2014
PlutoniumPlutonium andand HighlyHighly EnrichedEnriched UraniumUranium 20152015 INSTITUTEINSTITUTE FOR FOR SCIENCE SCIENCE AND AND INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SECURITY India’s Stocks of Civil and Military Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium, End 20141 By David Albright and Serena Kelleher-Vergantini November 2, 2015 1 This report is part of a series on national and global stocks of nuclear explosive materials in both civil and military nuclear programs. This work was generously funded by a grant from the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). This work builds on earlier work done at ISIS by one of the authors. 440 First Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20001 TEL 202.547.3633 Twitter @TheGoodISIS E-MAIL [email protected] • www.isis-online.org Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1. India’s Civil Plutonium Stockpile .................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Civil Plutonium Production ........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Plutonium Separation ................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 India’s Fast Breeder Reactors .............................................................................................. 6 1.3 Unirradiated Plutonium Inventory ............................................................................................. -
US Energy Exports to India
Vol. 3, Issue 5 May 2013 U.S. Energy Exports to India: A Game India’s Energy by the Numbers Changer 75% Amb. Karl F. Inderfurth and Persis Khambatta Of India’s energy is imported; by 2023 the number is expected to rise to 90 percent. When Indian foreign secretary Ranjan Mathai came to Washington in February, energy was high on his agenda. Energy cooperation, he said, 4th “could be a real big game changer…You will start a chain of investments Largest energy consumer in the world. As India’s far bigger than anything we’ve had before.” He found a highly receptive energy needs have vastly increased, it has been audience with high-ranking officials at the State and Energy Departments. unable to develop sufficient domestic energy With the policy communities in both capitals consistently looking for “the production capabilities and therefore relies heavily next big thing” on the horizon for the U.S.-India strategic partnership, the on imports to meet its energy demands. past few months have seen a potential breakthrough to expand U.S. 6th exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to India, which may lead to a big opportunity benefitting both countries. Largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) importer in the world. Until 2004, India produced all of its Changing Global Energy Landscape own LNG; in 2009, 21 percent of India’s total The United States and India are two of the world’s top five energy natural gas was imported. Importing is a financial consumers. To date, policy debates have focused on finding sustainable burden on federal funds, as imported LNG costs ways to satisfy the ever-expanding demand for energy by advanced twice as much as that produced domestically.