DOCSLIB.ORG

Plan S and the Transition to Open Access

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plan S and the Transition to Open Access Plan S and the new leverage of library consortia in the open access transition EIFL: Knowledge Without Boundaries EIFL General Assembly │ 8 August 2019, Bishkek Colleen Campbell Open Access 2020 Initiative │ Max Planck Digital Library @oa2020ini @oa2020ini Introductions Colleen Campbell Open Access 2020 Initiative Max Planck Digital Library @ColleenCampbe11 [email protected] OA2020 is a global alliance of higher education and research organizations across five continents adopting strategies to transform today’s scholarly journals from the current subscription system to new open access publishing models. https://oa2020.org 1 To start, Чоң рахмат @oa2020ini Our agenda What will we cover? 1. Background and Context 2. The Plan S Principles • Why, Who, How 3. New leverage for library consortia • Transformative Agreements • How they work • Case study: Projekt DEAL - Wiley 4. What transformative strategy can we develop with EIFL? 5. Key takeaways and what’s next 1. Background and context @oa2020ini What progress have we made in the open access transition? The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles doi:10.7717/peerj.4375. 5 @oa2020ini Removing barriers Poverty is created by barriers. To fight poverty, we have to see and study the barriers, and then go around them or through them so the poor aren't cut off from benefits others enjoy. Melinda Gates 6 2. The Plan S Principles cOAlition S I 8 Why Plan S? “Science, as an institution of organised criticism, can… only function properly if research results are made openly available to the community so that they can be submitted to the test and scrutiny of other researchers” “we have been talking about open access for 20 years; it is time to do it properly” (speaker at Open Repositories 2019 conference session on Plan S) (Of course, Scielo has been doing it properly in one way for 20 years…) cOAlition S I 9 cOAlition S: who? National European funders: European funders: Austria: FWF European Research Council Finland: AKA European Commission France: ANR Ireland: SFI Charitable foundations: Italy: INFN The Wellcome Trust Luxembourg: FNR The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Netherlands: NWO Norway: RCN Global dimension Poland: NCN Jordan: HCST Slovenia: ARRS Zambia : NSTC Sweden: FORMAS, FORTE, VINNOVA African Academy of Sciences UK: UKRI The Government of India Sao Paulo Statement : AmeLICA, SciELo, African Open Science Platform, OA2020, cOAlition S Coordinated action with OA2020 cOAlition S I 10 Plan S: Built on strong principles No publication should be locked behind a paywall OA must be immediate, i.e. no embargo periods No copyright transfer; publication under a CC BY license by default Transparency about pricing and contracts Funders commit to support publication fees at a reasonable level Multiple routes to OA compliance Commitment to assess research outputs based on their intrinsic merit and NOT venue of publication cOAlition S I 11 Working with key stakeholders: other OA initiatives cOAlition S I 12 Multiple routes to compliance https://www.coalition-s.org/principles-and-implementation/ Open Access publishing Subscription venues Transition of Subscription venues (journals or (repository route) venues (transformative platforms) arrangements) Route Authors publish in an Authors publish in a Authors publish Open Open Access journal or subscription journal and Access in a subscription on an Open Access make either the final journal under a platform. published version transformative (Version of Record arrangement. (VoR)) or the Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) openly available in a repository. Funding cOAlition S funders will cOAlition S funders will cOAlition S funders can financially support not financially support contribute financially to publication fees. "hybrid" Open Access Open Access publishing publication fees in under transformative subscription venues. arrangements. @oa2020ini Even where local OA platforms are successful, we cannot afford not to have a publisher negotiation strategy @oa2020ini Plan S has created the perfect storm 14 3. New leverage for library consortia @oa2020ini Synergy between Plan S and OA2020 https://www.coalition-s.org/principles-and-implementation/ 16 @oa2020ini Transformative agreements Transformative agreements are those contracts negotiated between institutions (libraries, national and regional consortia) and publishers that transform the business model underlying scholarly journals from subscription to open access. They aim to constrain costs of scholarly communication and foster sustainability and equity in scholarly publishing https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/ @oa2020ini Shared set of community guidelines - Temporary and transitional - Authors retain exclusive rights to their works - Agreements must be transparent - Include permanent access - Constrain costs of scholarly communication and foster equity in scholarly publishing - Govern service and workflow requirements to ensure that the needs of authors and administrators are addressed https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/guidelines-for-transformative-agreements/ https://esac-initiative.org/guidelines/ @oa2020ini Validated and supported by the global research community https://oa2020.org/b14-conference/final-statement/ 19 @oa2020ini Validated and supported by the global FINAL STATEMENT research14thcommunity Berlin Open Access Conference We are all committed to authors retaining their copyrights, We are all committed to complete and immediate open access, We are all committed to accelerating the progress of open access through transformative agreements that are temporary and transitional, with a shift to full open access within a very few years. These agreements should, at least initially, be cost-neutral, with the expectation that economic adjustments will follow as the markets transform. Publishers are expected to work with all members of the global research community to effect complete and immediate open access according to this statement. https://oa2020.org/b14-conference/final-statement/ 20 @oa2020ini Note: cost-neutral is based on legacy pricing (no social justice in subscriptions!) Person/tear 0,00 500,00 1.000,00 1.500,00 2.000,00 2.500,00 3.000,00 3.500,00 C2 C1 C18 C17**** C11 Calculation: Annual spend on 5 big publishers / C8 GDP per capita C21 Interpretation: the result represents the number of C19 people that need to work for one year C10 (person/year), given a certain GDP per capita, in C4 order to reach the same monetary value as the cost with the 5 big publishers in that country. C3*** C32** GDP per capita: source Eurostat (data from 2017) C31**** C12 https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/2019%20big%20deals%20report.pdf @oa2020ini Momentum is growing globally After Austria, the Netherlands, the UK, Sweden, Norway and Germany, now Japan, Spain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, France, Switzerland, Greece, Hungary, Slovenia, the United States and beyond! 22 @oa2020ini Publishers embracing transformation https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/ @oa2020ini How they work Digital transition Money flow shifted from individual subscriptions to the big deal package @oa2020ini How they work Digital transition Money flow shifted from individual subscriptions to the big deal package Subscriptions @oa2020ini How they work Hybrid era Authors increasingly pay APCs in the wild to publish open access + Subscriptions Open access 26 @oa2020ini How they work Open access transition Transformative Agreement Hybrid spending is reined in and the two sides of scholarly communication are governed under a single agreement Subscriptions Open access http://esac-initiative.org/ @oa2020ini How they work Open access transition Transformative Agreement Money previously spent for access is now used for open access publishing services Subscriptions Open access 28 @oa2020ini How they work Open access transition Costs are assessed transparently, based on actual publication volume. Publication Fee Reading Fee @oa2020ini How they work Open access transition Models continue to evolve. In the DEAL agreement, the cost of access is incorporated into the per-article “Publish & Read” fee. @oa2020ini How they work The next step Preconditions established for a diverse and innovative scholarly publishing landscape: - Costs associated with level of service - Price transparency - Funds free to flow where needed Case Study – Projekt DEAL - Wiley Wiley and Project DEAL partner to enhance the future of scholarly research and publishing in Germany 15. January 2019 Objectives - Increase the impact of German research, publishing results open access for the world to read and build upon - Ensure German authors retain exclusive rights to their works and the opportunity to publish in the venues of their choice - Rein in the escalating costs of scholarly communication - Accelerate the global open access transition for the benefit of scholars, students and citizens. https://www.projekt-deal.de/faq-wiley-contract/ @oa2020ini Cost-neutral transition ~3% average 2017 + 12,5% 2017 + 10% 2017 + 8% PAR fee PAR fee PAR fee pre-payment pre-payment pre-payment Subscription 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 Pre-payment amount of estimated total PAR fees remains on the level of previous subscription spending (based on 2017 subscription fees) and APC’s “in the wild” have been reined in = cost neutral 33 @oa2020ini Agreement features - Euro 2750 Publish & Read fee (PAR fee not an APC) - No cap on # of articles - Preference for CC-BY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Full White Paper
    Open Access White Paper University of Oregon SENATE SUB-COMMITTEE ON OPEN ACCESS I. Executive Summary II. Introduction a. Definition and History of the Open Access Movement b. History of Open Access at the University of Oregon c. The Senate Subcommittee on Open Access at the University of Oregon III. Overview of Current Open Access Trends and Practices a. Open Access Formats b. Advantages and Challenges of the Open Access Approach IV. OA in the Process of Research & Dissemination of Scholarly Works at UO a. A Summary of Current Circumstances b. Moving Towards Transformative Agreements c. Open Access Publishing at UO V. Advancing Open Access at the University of Oregon and Beyond a. Barriers to Moving Forward with OA b. Suggestions for Local Action at UO 1 Executive Summary The state of global scholarly communications has evolved rapidly over the last two decades, as libraries, funders and some publishers have sought to hasten the spread of more open practices for the dissemination of results in scholarly research worldwide. These practices have become collectively known as Open Access (OA), defined as "the free, immediate, online availability of research articles combined with the rights to use these articles fully in the digital environment." The aim of this report — the Open Access White Paper by the Senate Subcommittee on Open Access at the University of Oregon — is to review the factors that have precipitated these recent changes and to explain their relevance for members of the University of Oregon community. Open Access History and Trends Recently, the OA movement has gained momentum as academic institutions around the globe have begun negotiating and signing creative, new agreements with for-profit commercial publishers, and as innovations to the business models for disseminating scholarly research have become more widely adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie Der Wissenschaften 2 Contents 1
    Project DEAL: Plans, Challenges, Results Martin Grötschel Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities Day Two, October 10, 2019 10:10-10:40: [Keynote Two] Contents 1. About me 2. Open Science 3. Project DEAL: The Plans and Challenges 4. Project DEAL: The Current State 5. Project DEAL: Future Challenges 6. Summary Die Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften 2 Contents 1. About me 2. Open Science 3. Project DEAL: The Plans and Challenges 4. Project DEAL: The Current State 5. Project DEAL: Future Challenges 6. Summary Die Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften 3 Some of my (current/former) OA activities German Academies & Politics . President Berlin Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (BBAW) . 2001 Telota Initiative of BBAW (The Electronic Life Of The Academy) . 2015 Open Access Strategy of the State of Berlin . 2016- Chair of Open Access Strategy Working Group Berlin . 2019 Open Science Strategy of BBAW DEAL related activities (since 25 years) . Current Member: DEAL Negotiation Team . Former President: Zuse Institute for Information Technology . Former Member: Committee of Electronic Information and Communication of the International Mathematical Union . Former Chair: IuK-Initiative (Information and Communication Initiative) of German Scientific Associations . Former Head of the organizational office of the Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg (KOBV) Berlin -Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities 4 Some of My Convictions . As a scientist, I am paid from public (taxpayers‘) funds. Therefore, I consider the results of my publicly funded research as a “public good”. As a consequence, these results should be made available to the public free of charge and without use restrictions (subject to legal constraints).
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Waters: Publishing Literacy – a New Role for Marine Science Librarians?
    TESTING THE WATERS: PUBLISHING LITERACY – A NEW ROLE FOR MARINE SCIENCE LIBRARIANS? Olivia Karin Diehr Christian Heene Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW) Seestrasse 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany Abstract Libraries have a strong service culture. For decades information literacy has been well established in our libraries and information centers. The training on skills to search, evaluate and consume information is a substantial part of libraries’ information literacy programs. At the same time, library services for authors still seem to be in their infancy, at least in specialized libraries beyond universities. There are plenty of varied possibilities to discover. Let us test the waters and explore how librarians may contribute to the publishing process of authors at their institutions. Where are the potential docking points for libraries during the writing and publishing process? Where are exciting opportunities to see? Which limitations have to considered? Keywords: Publishing process, information literacy, author support, library future, digital transformation, library services, open access. Do you Know what a liblisher is? Or a publarian? A liblisher or a publarian is a person who works in a library or in an information center. They contribute to the writing and publication process of scientific authors in the widest sense. There are two reasons why liblishers and publarians are introduced to you as our new job titles and why librarians are able to contribute to the writing and publishing process in their institutions: 1. The transformation within the publishing process. 2. The librarian’s future position. Both reasons are consequences of the so called Digital turn. The Digital Turn Printed Aquisitions Our library‘s acquisitions are decreasing, due to the cancellations of major scientific publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Transformative Agreements in the Global Open Access Transition Germany‘S Project DEAL
    The Impact of Transformative Agreements in the Global Open Access Transition Germany‘s Project DEAL 29.11.2019 Bibliotecas y Archivos del CSIC por la Ciencia Abierta: presente y futuro Madrid | 28-29 noviembre 2019 Kai Geschuhn | Max Planck Digital Library THE RATIONALE FOR THE OA TRANSITION … and the origins of Projekt DEAL. 2 Origins of Projekt DEAL 3 10 years after the Berlin Declaration: What have we accomplished? Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature described in the Budapest, Bethesda and Berlin Declarations of 2002/3 The author(s) and right holder(s) of such contributions grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship 4 Still today 82% of new research is published behind subscription paywalls Still today 82% of new research is published behind subscription paywalls 5 Authors want their journals “64% of respondents indicated they would be happy to see the traditional subscription-based publication model replaced entirely by an open access system…. Some 70% of faculty stated “If the traditional subscription-based publication model is replaced entirely by an open access model, I would be happy to see the same publishers stay involved in the open access model” https://sr.ithaka.org/publications/2018-us-faculty-survey/ 6 Expectation of scholars in the 21st century doi:10.1126/science.aaf5664
    [Show full text]
  • Publication of and Access to Literature in S&T in India
    Suggestions for a National Framework for Publication of and Access to Literature in Science and Technology in India Chakraborty, S., Gowrishankar, J., Joshi, A., Kannan,P., Kohli, R.K., Lakhotia, S.C., Misra, G., Nautiyal,C.M., Ramasubramanian, K., Sathyamurthy, N., Singhvi, A.K. Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi Indian Academy of Sciences, Bengaluru National Academy of Sciences India, Allahabad 1 Executive Summary Results of deliberation on various aspects of publication and free access to scientific literature by a panel of experts from three science academies, viz. Indian National Science Academy, Indian Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Sciences India, are described below. The following recommendations are made. 1. India needs a comprehensive infrastructure to ensure that its Science Community has an unhindered access to Global Scientific and Technical literature in real time and that Indian work is published such that it has an international visibility. 2. The paradigm of “One Nation-One Subscription” is considered as an optimum choice. A committee of Science Academies may be asked to develop the guidelines for an optimum use of such an access. 3. All scientific literature arising from public-funded research should be available in public domain. This should include, research papers, doctoral theses and other reports. However, literature of a priori classified nature be exempted from this clause. 4. Use of the diverse free and immediate OA preprint archives may be considered. The preprints may be subsequently linked with published material, when published. Research output on preprint archives should be eligible for assessment of individuals and institutions.”. 5. Research grants from all Public sources will carry an explicit provision for Publication charges with the PIs having the choice of final destination for the publication of their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Tearing Down Paywalls in Scholarly Communication
    Locked up science Tearing down paywalls in scholarly communication Claudia Frick - @FuzzyLeapfrog #35c3 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Cite with https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1495601 Science Library Science Library Science Library Science …? • Education and decision-making Science …? • Education and decision-making • Health and diseases Science …? • Education and decision-making • Health and diseases • Environmental challenges Restricting access to science ≠ Benefit for society of scientific publications 72% are locked up behind paywalls Piwowar et al. (2018) https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 = Access to science This icon and all following icons are made by Freepik from Flaticon and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License “Open Access describes the goal of making global knowledge accessible and re-usable in digital form without financial, technical or legal barriers.” Translated by @FuzzyLeapfrog from Allianzinitiative https://www.allianzinitiative.de/archiv/open-access/ Roadmap How can we tear down the paywalls? Roadmap What does the most common way of scientific publishing look like? How can we tear down the paywalls? Scientist Scientist © Laney Griner Scientist Put it on the internet! Scientist Scientist Conference Journal Submission Scientist Publisher Journal Submission Preprint Scientist Publisher Journal Submission Peer Review Preprint Scientist Publisher Journal Submission Peer Review Preprint Scientist Scientists @MInkorrekt (2017) https://youtu.be/BEOvsvwi2_k
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Communication Task Force Report Recommendations Final.Pdf
    1 Scholarly Communication Task Force Report and Recommendations August 24, 2020 Task Force Members: Daniel Andresen, Doris Carroll, Christopher Culbertson, Huston Gibson, Justin Kastner, Katie Kingery-Page, Brian Lindshield, Mindy Markham, Ryan Otto, Suzanne Porath, Jaebeom Suh, Lisa Tatonetti, and Sheila Yeh 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Task Force Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………………….3 Budget Implications……………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Background information…………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Summary of Professional Societies……………………………………………………………………………….8 Summary of Scholarly Communication in the United States………………………………………………........14 Summary of Scholarly Communication in Europe and Latin America………………………………………….16 Summary of Current Scholarly Communication Initiatives at K-State………………………………………….17 Task Force Process for Gathering Information from Campus Community.....…………………………………..18 Glossary………………………………………………………………………………………………………….19 3 Executive Summary To address issues resulting from the serials crisis at Kansas State University, Provost Charles Taber, Faculty Senate President Tanya González, and Dean of Libraries Lori Goetsch created the Scholarly Communication Task Force during the 2019 fall semester. The purpose of this task force is to gather stakeholders in the K-State community to review the current landscape of scholarly communication practices on campus and offer recommendations to improve not only access to information at K-State but direct our institutional
    [Show full text]
  • The OA Interviews: Virginia Steel, Norman and Armena Powell University Librarian at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
    The OA Interviews: Virginia Steel, Norman and Armena Powell University Librarian at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) RICHARD POYNDER 29th July 2018 Click here to go direct to the Q&A with Virginia Steel Who would have thought in 2002 that the sixteen “open” enthusiasts who that year launched the Budapest Open Access Initiative were about to unleash on the world a chain of events that some believe will eventually upend the 350-year old scholarly publishing system, and has in the meantime thrown researchers, librarians, universities, funders, governments and scholarly publishers into what at times looks like a dance of death. Of course, the key driver for the changes that scholarly publishing is currently going through was the emergence of the internet, since those changes would not be possible without the web. And in fact, publishers had begun to take advantage of the new digital network a decade before open access became a thing. Elsevier, for instance, launched its online database of electronic journals ScienceDirect eight years prior to BOAI. But publishers had assumed they would simply port the traditional subscription model to the online environment and carry on much as before, all be it a subscription model re-imagined as the now infamous Big Deal. In other words, as the name suggests, what was radical about the BOAI was not its recognition that journals could now be put online, but the assumption that this could be done without the imposition of paywalls. In retrospect, we can see that this simple idea has ended up calling into question practically every aspect of traditional scholarly publishing, not excluding traditional peer review and the need for legacy publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dear Directorate General for Competition, We Are Writing to You in the Capacity of a Group of Researchers Who Benefit From
    Dear Directorate General for Competition, We are writing to you in the capacity of a group of researchers who benefit from the production of scholarly research articles, and also as authors of scientific articles that fall under the scholarly publishing market. We write to notify you of what we believe to be the anti-competitive practices of RELX Group in the scholarly publishing and analytics industry, based on the following two articles of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU): 1. Article 101 of the Treaty, which prohibits agreements between two or more independent market operators which restrict competition; and 2. Article 102 of the Treaty prohibits firms that hold a dominant position on a given market to abuse that position. This complaint regarding RELX Group, and specifically its daughter company, Elsevier, is based on the following grounds: 1. General problems within the scholarly publishing market sector that actively prohibit competition in the common market between EU member states (Article 101); and 2. Abuse of a dominant position within this market (Article 102). The grounds on which we believe these statements to be true are set out below with reference to the primary academic literature that has been studied, the general scholarly publishing landscape in the EU, previous competition inquiries, and financial statements from RELX Group. In 2002, the UK Office of Fair Trading Standards published a report (OFT 396) of its investigation into the market for Scientific, Technical and Medical (STM) journals. Here, the report concluded that the journal market was not functioning well due to inelastic demand, a lack of price competition and sensitivity, and that regulatory intervention would be required should conditions fail to improve.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratising Knowledge: a Report on the Scholarly Publisher, Elsevier
    Education International Research Democratising Knowledge: a report on the scholarly publisher, Elsevier Dr. Jonathan Tennant October 2018 Education International Research Democratising Knowledge: a report on the scholarly publisher, Elsevier Dr. Jonathan Tennant October 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Published by Education International - Oct. 2018 Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ISBN 978-92-95109-72-8 (PDF) ShareAlike 4.0 International License. (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Cover: Fredk - EI About the author: Dr. Jonathan Tennant Nomadic Palaeontologist, Rogue Open Scientist; PhD, MEarthSci, MSc Founder of paleorXiv (https://paleorxiv.org/), a free digital publishing platform for Palaeontology Companion Website on Github Founder of the Open Science MOOC (https://opensciencemooc.github.io/site/) Project development on GitHub Freelance science communicator and consultant Author of Excavate! Dinosaurs and World of Dinosaurs (coming 2018) Executive Editor of Geoscience Communication Editor for the PLOS Paleo Community Personal website - Home of the Green Tea and Velociraptors blog. ORCID: 0000-0001-7794-0218 Twitter: @protohedgehog Education International Education International represents organisations of teachers and other education employees across the globe. It is the world’s largest federation of unions and associations, representing thirty million education employees in about four hundred organisations in one hundred and seventy countries and territories, across the globe. Education International unites teachers and education employees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation of Open Access Initiatives in Europe
    Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 17 (2019), 3–6 Copyright © Asociația de Psihologie Industrială și Organizațională (APIO) http://dx.doi.org/10.24837/pru.2019.1.490 EDITORIAL The situation of Open Access initiatives in Europe GEORGE GUNNESCH-LUCA Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Academic journal publishers are currently that the $3.5m bill – representing the yearly riding an enormous success wave. That amount due to publishers – is not sustainable, academic publishing is really big business citing in some cases an increase of 145% over should take no one by surprise, nevertheless, a the previous six years. Furthermore, the memo rundown of the numbers may provide some also encouraged the faculty members to stop perspective on its magnitude. Take, for submitting to paywalled journals, and start example, Elsevier, the Amsterdam-based making their research freely available via publishing powerhouse: According to 2017 Open-Access alternatives. This was a warning data, the publisher has been reporting yearly shot to everyone, as the issues at hand were not profit margins that reach upwards of 36%, isolated to Harvard alone. Pricing hikes were something that companies with considerably observed worldwide. For example, even if the larger mindshare, such as Apple, Starbucks, or exact numbers are not precisely known Disney, are struggling to even come close to. because the contracts are – for the most part – Several factors are at play here: Good confidential, the increase in overall costs was management, solid business practices, a strong estimated by librarians in Germany at the paywall system, but perhaps less obvious is beginning of 2017 to be about 5% per year, access to a constant stream of public with almost 60% of the yearly library budgets expenditure.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access and Some Guidance Open Access
    Definitions, Conflicts, Open Access and Some Guidance Open Access Free availability on the public Without The only constraint internet financial, on reproduction and distribution, permitting any users to legal, or and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give read, technical authors control over the integrity download, barriers of their work and the right to be copy, properly acknowledged and cited. other than those inseparable distribute, from gaining access to the print, internet itself. search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, https://open-access.net/en/information-on-open-access/what-is-open-access 27/08/2020 UZH Summer School "Yes, We're Open" 2 Colour Palette of OA Closed Access Green OA Gold OA Black Paid by readers Usually on an Often paid by authors https://sci-hub.tw/ (subscription) institutional repository (Article Processing ! (after embargo of e.g. 6 Charges, APC) months) Sometimes paid by Legal to use in CH Version might differ society/institution/etc: from publisher. (e.g. No «Diamond» or typsetting, sometimes «Platinum» before peer review) 27/08/2020 UZH Summer School "Yes, We're Open" 3 OA Routes 27/08/2020 UZH Summer School "Yes, We're Open" 4 Licenses: Creative Commons Free to: NonCommercial — You may not use the • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium material for commercial purposes. or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
    [Show full text]