ROYAL DANISH NAVY Ships Ol the Fleet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ROYAL DANISH NAVY Ships Ol the Fleet ROYAL DANISH NAVY Ships ol the Fleet June 19 77 Th e stren gth Bnd composi t i on of the Royal Dan i sh Nav y are gover ne d by t he Defe n c e Ac t oC Apr il, 1973 , ba s e d u p on a n a&ree m_ e n t ma de by 4 ma j or poli t ica l parti e s, and prolon ged f o r a n oth e r 4 years aa of Harc h, 19 77 . The De fence Ac t i s to some e x t e nt based on a statement made by t he ChieC of Navy end ing up i n wha t i s calle d wPI. n f or the Fl ee t 19 8 2 w • Th is plan i s lar gel y t h e r e sult of considerati on s rega rdi n g t h e outmo st u a e of the g e oph y s i cal s itua t i on i n the Bal t i c Approa ­ c h e a a nd the deai r e to c ontinue t h e establ i a hed balanc e d :flee t ­ comp osition . Th e fl e e t comp ositi on is as follows: Sta t u s Q.2.!.! Wa r Un i ts: Frigate s /Corvettes 5 5 Fast Patrol Boats 1 6 1 8 Submarin es 6 6 Minela y e r s 4 4 Coastal Minelayers 1 J Mine swe e p e r s 8 8 Seaw a rd Defence Craft 9 8 Combat Helicopters 0 8 Special Purpose Ships J Fi shery Prote c t ion Ships wi t h ocean eacort capability 5 5 I nspe c tion Cu t t or s ( Inshor e Cu t ters ) 5 5 Na val Cutte rs (Harbour Cutters) 9 9 Hel i cop ters 6 6 Oilers 2 2 Only during time of peace 2 mi n e l a ye r s a r e e mploy ed aa t ra i nin g s h ip Rnd depo t s hip , respec tive ly. They a r . , h oweve r , still capa ble of pe rfo rming t heir mine l a yin g wa r t im e tasks , as th"y cft n b e conv e> r t e d to suc h wi t h i n 48 hou r s . Th e c omba t h elieop t e r s are i n the ac t of be i n c c h o s " n , a nd orders are e xpected to be p laced wI thin the n e xt f isca l ye ar. Th e fl e et i s i n peaceti me o rganized i n f ou r squ a d r ons und e r operational c on t r o l o f F l ag Officer De nma rk, viz.: F r iga te Sq u adr o n co n t a ining: Fri gates Corve ttes Seaward Defence Cra ft . Mine Wa r f a r e Squ a d ron c on tai n i n g : Mine l a ye r s Coastal Mine l a y e n !l Mine s we e p ers . Fast Pa t r o l Boa t Squ adr on c on tai n i ng: Fas t Pa t r ol Boats Oi ler'8 . S ubma ~ i ne Squa d r on c on tai ning: Subm arines . The Harb ou r Cu t t e rs a re u nder the operational con t r o l or the va r i ou s na v a l d istricts . The Greenland Command and the Faeroe Comm a n d are exerci s ­ i ng operational c on t rol of t he F ishery Prot ection Sh ips a nd I n ­ spection Cu t t e r s (C o a s t al Cutters) i n the i r wa t ers . whe r e a s t he F i she r y Pr o t e c t i on Ships i n Danish wa t e rs are a ttached to the Friga te Squa d ron. The Royal Da n i s h Nav y ha s a new c on struc t i on p r ogramme c om­ prising: ,) Co rve t tes 10 Fast Patr ol Boat s 2 Coa s t a l Mi n e l a y e r s . Moder'n f ire con t rol s y stems a n d sophisticated passive sur _ veilin g equi pmen t a re u nder p r o cu r eme n t . Thi s p rogramme r epr e s en t s t h e lar gest na tional i nvestment progr a mme t h e Navy ha s ever h ad . TYPE: Frigate PEDER SKRAM-class NAME: NUMBER: LAID DOWN: COMPLETED: PEDER SKRAM F.352 September 1964 June 1966 HERLUF TROLLE F.353 Decem~er 1964 April 1967 Displacement: 2720 Length f"t.: 397 Beam f"t.: 40 Draught f"t.: 12 Engine: 2 diesel engines each of" 2400 BHP 2 gasturbines each of" 22.000 BHP Speed: Diesel 16,5 knots Gasturbines 32,5 knots Complement: 112 Remarks: The f"rigates are named af"ter two f"amous Danish admirals. They are built in Danish shipyard within the f"rame of the Danish/ American Cost Sharing Prog e, which was commenced in 1959. Originally they were armed with two double 5" all purpose guns plus 4 40 mm anti-aircraf"t guns. The frigates are now undertaking a midlife conversion, so in the future they will be armed with SEA SPARROW-missiles, HAR­ POON-missiles, one double 5" all purpose gun plus 40 mm's and a new type of torpedo. Thus, being of considerable strength,they are regarded as being the backbone of the naval defence, each of them acting as the tactical leader of the two surface action groups being established in wartime. TYPE: Corvette TRITON-class NAME: NUMBER I LAUNCHED: TRANSFEJUlED: BELLONA F.344 JaDUary 1955 JaDUary 1957 FLORA F.346 JUDe 1955 August 1956 TRITON F.347 September 1954 August 1955 Displacement: 873 Length 1't.: 250 Beam 1't.: 32 Draught 1't.: 9 Engine: 2 diesel engines each 01' 2200 BHP Speed: 20 knots C8lDplement: 110 Remarks: The corvettes are built in Italy for the Royal Danish Navy under the United States 01'f-Shore Account. They are 01' the same class as the Italian ALBATROS-class. Originally 4 corvettes vere transferred to the Royal Danish Navy, but the 1'ourth named DIANA vas scrapped in 1974. They are armed with two 3" all purpose guns plus one 40 mm anti-aircraft. They have a considerable amount of depth charges and hedgehog. They will within the next few years be replaced with a new type of Danish built corvette. TYPE: Seaward Defence Craft· DAPHNE-c1ass NAME: NUMBER: LAID DOWN: COMPLETED: DAPHNE P.530 April 1960 December 1961 DRYADEN P.531 July 1960 April 1962 HAVMANDEN P.532 November 1960 August 1962 HAVFRUEN P.533 March 1961 December 1962 NAJ"ADEN P.534 September 1961 Apri1 1963 NYMFEN P·535 April 1962 October 1963 NEPTUN P.536 September 1962 December 1963 RAN P.537 December 1962 May 1964 ROTA P.538 July 1963 January 1965 Displacement: 170 Length ft.: 121 Beam ft.: 20 Draught ft.: 6,5 Engine: 2 diesels each of 1300 BHP Speed: 20 knots Complement: 23 Remax 'ks: The Seaward Defence Craft are all built at the Royal Dock­ yard in Copenhagen, four of them under the United States Off-Shore Procurement. The DAPHNE-class was constxucted to patrol inshore Danish waters in close cooperation with the naval districts. They are equipped with one 40 mm anti-aircraft gun, depth­ charges and a 51 mm rocket launcher. They contribute with a notable effect to the surveillance and control with the Baltic Approaches. The DAPHNE-class will be replaced in the mid -80ies. The type to replace them is under consideration at the present, and depending on those considerations it might be a dual purpose type with the aim of having surveillance, control, and minesweeping performed by the same type of ship. TYPE: Fast Attack Craft Torpedo FALKEN-class NAME: NUMBER: LAID DOWN: COMPLETED: FALKEN P.506 November 1960 October 1962 GLENTEN P.507 January 1961 December 1962 GRIBBEN P.508 May 1961 April 196) H0GEN P.509 September 1961 June 196) Disp~acement: 119 Length ft.: 118 Beam ft.: 18 Draught ft.: 6 Engine: ) diesel engines each of )000 BHP Speed: 40 knots Complement: 2) Remarks: The FALKEN-class Fast Patrol Boats are all built in the Royal Dockyard in Copenhagen under United States of America Off­ Shore Procurement in the Military Aid Programme. They are constructed as a modern version of the traditional Second World War fast patrol boat. They are armed with one 40 mm anti-aircraft gun, one 20 mm anti-aircraft plus four 4~n torpedo tubes. They have a modern torpedo firing control system, which operates the torpedo salvo through wire-guidance. They are at the moment being phased out coordinated with the commissioning of the fast patrol boats mentioned under the new construction programme.
Recommended publications
  • Arktisk Kommando for Både Forskere Og Transportør
    UNCLASSIFIED Possibilities for logistic support from Joint Arctic Command 2020 DTU Logistikworkshop 2019 Bettina Ovgaard Science Liaison Officer JOINT ARCTIC COMMAND UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED AGENDA Area of Operation and tasks Assets How to apply for support Support to Science 2019 Evaluation of science support 2019 Support from Navy ships 2020 Station Nord boarder control – how to UNCLASSIFIED 2. december 2019 UNCLASSIFIED AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY UNCLASSIFIED TASKS Military: • Military defence of Greenland and Faroe Islands • Surveillance and maintenance of territorial sovereignty Coast guard: • Anti-pollution and oil spill recovery • Fishery Protection Search and Rescue: • Joint Rescue Coordination Centre (JRCC Greenland) Additional: • Hydrographical surveys of Greenland • Support to local communities • Police support UNCLASSIFIED 2. december 2019 UNCLASSIFIED ASSETS UNCLASSIFIED 2. december 2019 UNCLASSIFIED REQUEST FOR SUPPORT UNCLASSIFIED 2. december 2019 UNCLASSIFIED INTRUSIVE AND NON-INTRUSIVE PROJECTS Intrusive support is defined as binding the ship in time and space. Request for support from the Royal Danish Navy for an intrusive project (with or with out finance) is through DANISH CENTER FOR MARITIME RESEARCH. Non-intrusive support is defined as assistance done en route while patrolling and with great flexibility of time. Application for support from the Royal Danish Navy for a non-intrusive project is through ISAAFFIK.ORG. UNCLASSIFIED 2. december 2019 UNCLASSIFIED RULES OF ENGAGEMENT • Support in remote areas without commercial infrastructure. • Cost free for the Danish Defense. • Cancellation of support can happen with little notice due to operational tasks and weather. • All support is executed given that permits and other documents are obtained and in order. UNCLASSIFIED 2. december 2019 UNCLASSIFIED DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION Apply through DCH (intrusive) with or without funding Deadline: 1 April for the year to come.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Danish Naval Museu
    THE ROYAL DANISH NAVAL MUSEU An introduction to the History of th , Royal Danish Na~ Ole lisberg Jensen Royal Danish Naval Museum Copenhagen 1994 THE ROYAL DANISH NAVAL MUSEUM An introduction to the History of the Royal Danish Navy. Ole Lisberg Jensen Copyright: Ole Lisberg Jensen, 1994 Printed in Denmark by The Royal Danish Naval Museum and Amager Centraltrykkeri ApS Published by the Royal Danish Naval Museum ISBN 87-89322-18-5 Frontispiece: c. Neumann 1859 Danish naval vessel at anchor off the British coast. One of the first naval artists, Neumann sailed with the fleet on a summer expedition. Title: The famous Dutch battle artist, Willem van der Velde (the elder), sailed with the Dutch relief fleet to Copenhagen in October 1658. Here we see one of his sketches, showing 5 Danish naval vessels led by TREFOLDIGHED. Copenhagen is in the background. Photo: archives of the Royal Danish Naval Museum. Back cover: The building housing the Royal Danish Naval Museum at Christianshavns Ksnel was originally a hospital wing of the Sekveesthuset. In 1988-89, the building was converted for the use of the Royal Danish Naval Museum with the aid ofa magnificent donation from »TheA.P. Moller and Mrs. Chastine Meersk. Mckinney Moller's Foundation for General Purposes". The building was constructed in 1780 by master builder Schotmann. When it was handed over to the Royal Danish Naval Museum, the building passed from the responsibility of the Ministry of Defence to that of the Ministry of Culture. PREFACE This catalogue is meant as a contribution to an understan­ War the models were evacuated to Frederiksborg Slot, and it ding ofthe chronology ofthe exhibits in the Royal Danish Na­ was not until 1957that the Royal Danish Naval Museum was val Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs
    Jeremy Stöhs ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Jeremy Stöhs is the Deputy Director of the Austrian Center for Intelligence, Propaganda and Security Studies (ACIPSS) and a Non-Resident Fellow at the Institute for Security Policy, HOW HIGH? Kiel University. His research focuses on U.S. and European defence policy, maritime strategy and security, as well as public THE FUTURE OF security and safety. EUROPEAN NAVAL POWER AND THE HIGH-END CHALLENGE ISBN 978875745035-4 DJØF PUBLISHING IN COOPERATION WITH 9 788757 450354 CENTRE FOR MILITARY STUDIES How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Djøf Publishing In cooperation with Centre for Military Studies 2021 Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge © 2021 by Djøf Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior written permission of the Publisher. This publication is peer reviewed according to the standards set by the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Cover: Morten Lehmkuhl Print: Ecograf Printed in Denmark 2021 ISBN 978-87-574-5035-4 Djøf Publishing Gothersgade 137 1123 København K Telefon: 39 13 55 00 e-mail: [email protected] www. djoef-forlag.dk Editors’ preface The publications of this series present new research on defence and se- curity policy of relevance to Danish and international decision-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Overvie Nato Defence Planning Capability Review
    ràai NORTH ATlANTIC COUNCIL L nL •)VÀ1LI CONSEIL DE UATLANTIQUE NoRD 22 May 2014 DOCUMENT C-M(2014)0027 (DE-OVERVIE NATO DEFENCE PLANNING CAPABILITY REVIEW 201312014 DENMARK OVERVIEW 1. The 2013-2017 Defence Agreement agreed in November 2012 by seven of the eight political parties represented in the Danish Parliament introduced measures to improve efficiency and inciudes a reduction of the defence budget by approximately 12% of the 2013 budget. As a result there will be major changes to the structure of the armed forces. However, there is a clear political objective that the budget cuts will not impact operational capability. Continued participation in operations is a priority within the Danish defence organisation and forces will continue to be configured to be able to deploy at short notice. The freeing of money spent on operations in Afghanistan, as a result of a reduced level of forces, will be reinvested in defence, into programmes designed to maintain operational capabilities in terms of training and materiel, but will not fully compensate for the budget reductions. 2. The aim of Denmark’s foreign and security policy is the promotion of national security and prosperity based on core values of freedom, democracy and human rights. NATO remains a cornerstone of Danish security and defence policy. Denmark’s armed forces, contributing to the defence dimension of its pro-active foreign and security policy, are actively engaged in current international operations, conducted under the aegis of NATO or the UN. Active engagement in the Arctic/High North is also of strategic importance to Denmark and to that end, in October 2012, two existing structures were merged into a Joint Arctic Command which was established in Nuuk, Greenland.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Based Sources of Marine Litter – a Review of Current Knowledge and Assessment of Data Gaps (Second Interim Report of Gesamp Working Group 43, 4 June 2020)
    August 2020 COFI/2020/SBD.8 8 E COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES Thirty-Fourth Session Rome, 1-5 February 2021 (TBC) SEA-BASED SOURCES OF MARINE LITTER – A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT OF DATA GAPS (SECOND INTERIM REPORT OF GESAMP WORKING GROUP 43, 4 JUNE 2020) SEA-BASED SOURCES OF MARINE LITTER – A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT OF DATA GAPS Second Interim Report of GESAMP Working Group 43 4 June 2020 GESAMP WG 43 Second Interim Report, June 4, 2020 COFI/2021/SBD.8 Notes: GESAMP is an advisory body consisting of specialized experts nominated by the Sponsoring Agencies (IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP and ISA). Its principal task is to provide scientific advice concerning the prevention, reduction and control of the degradation of the marine environment to the Sponsoring Organizations. The report contains views expressed or endorsed by members of GESAMP who act in their individual capacities; their views may not necessarily correspond with those of the Sponsoring Organizations. Permission may be granted by any of the Sponsoring Organizations for the report to be wholly or partially reproduced in publication by any individual who is not a staff member of a Sponsoring Organizations of GESAMP, provided that the source of the extract and the condition mentioned above are indicated. Information about GESAMP and its reports and studies can be found at: http://gesamp.org Copyright © IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP, ISA 2020 ii Authors: Kirsten V.K. Gilardi (WG 43 Chair), Kyle Antonelis, Francois Galgani, Emily Grilly, Pingguo He, Olof Linden, Rafaella Piermarini, Kelsey Richardson, David Santillo, Saly N.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Sheet
    TACTICALL NAVY REFERENCES Internal Communication External Communication TactiCall gives you complete control and fast access to all net- TactiCall is a perfect match for Task- or coalition force operations, works on board your vessel. Be it Functional Nets including teleph- including other military arms. SOF teams, air force, marine detach- ony, public address, entertainment systems and the like or Fighting ments and even civil and NGO agencies can be important players Nets handling alarms, broadcasts and orders, weapon teams or in the operation. More often than not, this setup includes a multi- mission control. tude of different frequency bands, networks and radio equipment. TactiCall will integrate all these into one simple and easy to use TactiCall is highly flexible and scalable, it is platform independent solution that permits everybody to reach each other regardless of and will integrate seamlessly into your combat management sys- equipment and technology used. tem of choice. In other words TactiCall lets you control all internal communication on board your vessel and with features such as TactiCall will allow key features for modern day operations like red/ record and playback helps you log and later analyze your commu- black separation, multi-level security operations, global public ad- nication flows. dress and allowing government or task force commanders to com- municate directly with whoever needs to be addressed in a given situation - facilitating a much smoother and more rapid “Statement of No Objections” chain. Contact Porten
    [Show full text]
  • Utilising Local Capacities
    CENTRE FOR MILITARY STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN Utilising Local Capacities Maritime Emergency Response across the Arctic Andreas Østhagen February 2017 Denne rapport er en del af Center for Militære Studiers forskningsbaserede myndighedsbe- tjening for Forsvarsministeriet og de politiske partier bag forsvarsforliget. Formålet med rapporten er at studere og analysere de forskellige måder, hvorpå landene i Arktis benytter sig af lokale kapaciteter i forbindelse med maritim sikkerhed og beredskab i Arktis. Dette muliggør en vurdering af, hvordan beredskabsniveauet i nordlige farvande kan øges yderligere, samt hvilke spørgsmål som burde undersøges af fremtidige studier. Center for Militære Studier er et forskningscenter på Institut for Statskundskab på Københavns Universitet. På centret forskes der i sikkerheds- og forsvarspolitik samt militær strategi. Forskningen danner grundlag for forskningsbaseret myndighedsbetjening af Forsvarsministeriet og de politiske partier bag forsvarsforliget. Denne rapport er et analysearbejde baseret på forskningsmæssig metode. Rapportens konklusioner er ikke et udtryk for holdninger hos den danske regering, det danske forsvar eller andre myndigheder. Læs mere om centret og dets aktiviteter på: http://cms.polsci.ku.dk/. Forfatter: Ph.d.-stipendiat Andreas Østhagen, Senior Fellow at The Arctic Institute. ISBN: 978-87-7393-796-9 i This report is a part of Centre for Military Studies’ policy research services for the Ministry of Defence and the political parties to the Defence Agreement. The purpose of the report is to examine and analyse the different ways Arctic countries are utilising local capacities when managing emergency situations in the maritime Arctic. This enables an evaluation of how the level of preparedness can be further enhanced in northern waters, as well as what questions should be examined by future studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship of Shame Gender and Nation in Narratives of the 1981 Soviet Submarine Crisis in Sweden
    Ship of Shame Gender and Nation in Narratives of the 1981 Soviet Submarine Crisis in Sweden ✣ Cecilia Ase˚ On the evening of 27 October 1981, a Soviet submarine, U-137, ran aground and was stranded on a rock in a restricted military area near a naval base in Karlskrona, in the southeastern part of Sweden. The boat was discovered the next morning by a local fisherman, who alerted the authorities. Until 6 November, when the submarine was restored to a Soviet fleet waiting beyond the limits of Sweden’s territorial waters, it remained an object of marked military attention and intense diplomatic negotiations. Media coverage of the incident was extensive and made headline news in Sweden and around the world. From Sweden’s perspective, the submarine was a security threat and a flagrant breach of the country’s territorial sovereignty. After the delayed dis- covery of the boat, the Swedish military acted resolutely. Heavily armed troops filled the islands surrounding the submarine, numerous military vessels took positions nearby, and marine helicopters and air force planes circled the area. However, as the diplomatic negotiations became protracted, the sense of shock and disbelief diminished, and concern over national prestige and reputation became all the more rampant. A sense of danger returned with renewed force on the afternoon of 5 November, when Prime Minister Thorbjorn¨ Falldin¨ announced with restrained emotion at a press conference that the submarine carried nuclear weapons.1 This declaration was sensational news and made the violation of Swedish territory appear all the more serious. In the decade following the U-137 episode, the Swedish military was involved in numerous other submarine searches, evicting what were ostensibly foreign submarines from Swedish waters and dropping sink bombs.
    [Show full text]
  • FEATURED SPEAKERS DAY 1 Vice Admiral Scott Stearney, Commander, Combined Maritime Forces Vice Adm
    DAY ONE: 29 January 2019 OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVES This Day will provide you with an analysis of current Day One will: operations, ranging from MIO, counter-narcotics, mine Improve your understanding of operational challenges and warfare and anti-piracy to peer-on-peer contest. Ways allow you to align your solutions to the requirements of key to enhance operational versatility and multi-mission NATO Navies modularity to retain combat superiority against the Help you enhance interoperability and integrate a common full spectrum of asymmetric and conventional threats naval architecture for multinational operations by listening to senior naval officers about best practices will be covered. Strategic leaders from NATO navies and Debate how to attain strategic maritime superiority for partners will examine distributed lethality, CONOPS, operations against low volume threats, such as illegal TTPs, interoperability, and situational awareness in fisheries, trafficking, piracy congested and degraded C2 operating environments. Given Provide feedback from current operations to refine your the increasingly inter-connected operating environment, CONOPS and TTPs for future conflict speakers will outline current and anticipated capability, as Enhance your understanding of ways to strengthen well as emerging requirements to retain the competitive maritime security in your area of responsibility and edge in multi-domain warfare. upgrade C2and ISR in congested environments FEATURED SPEAKERS DAY 1 Vice Admiral Scott Stearney, Commander, Combined Maritime Forces Vice Adm. Scott Stearney is a native of Chicago, Illinois. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame prior to commissioning in the U.S. Navy in 1982. He entered flight training and was designated a Naval Aviator in 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Currents in the Arctic Perspectives from Three Arctic Littoral States
    NORTHERN CONNECTIONS MAY 2019 Shifting Currents in the Arctic Perspectives from Three Arctic Littoral States The Arctic is a beautiful but demanding region. The sun sets in October and does not return until March; temperatures average 32 degrees Fahrenheit in the summer and -40 degrees Fahrenheit in winter; and infrastructure is limited or absent. It is a place of many contradictions, no more so than now, when economic activity is increasing and national, geostrategic interests are confronting established practices of international cooperation and rules and norms. Russian president Vladimir Putin’s speech at the Arctic International Forum in St. Petersburg earlier this month foreshadowed this confrontation. He portrayed Russia as a facilitator in the making the Northern Sea Route (NSR) “safe and commercially feasible” for all nations, even as Russia is acting in contravention of international law by charging application fees and harbor/navigation costs. (Russia views the NSR as an internal passage; the international community views it as an international passage.) Equally, though Putin has denied any military tension in the Arctic, Russia is sending new units and capabilities to the region, including a new Arctic rifle brigade and S-400 missile systems, and conducting live-fire naval drills. Three Arctic coastal nations and NATO members represented in the essays below—Canada, the Kingdom of Denmark, and the United States—are well aware of the contradictions, challenges, and opportunities presented by increased economic and military activity in the Arctic and are adjusting their strategies and resources accordingly. While each approach is unique, there are several common elements. These include an increased focus on maritime surveillance and situational awareness, investment in more sustainable, survivable platforms, and a doubling down on joint and whole-of-government approaches to reflect the multiple missions in the Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • M2089 Selected German Documents from the Records of the Naval
    M2089 SELECTED GERMAN DOCUMENTS FROM THE RECORDS OF THE NAVAL RECORDS COLLECTION OF THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RECORDS AND LIBRARY, 1897–1917 Timothy P. Mulligan prepared the Introduction and arranged these records for microfilming. National Archives and Records Administration Washington, DC 2006 INTRODUCTION On the four rolls of this microfilm publication, M2089, are reproduced the contents of 34 logbooks and other bound volumes of original German Navy and merchant marine records located among the Naval Records Collection of the Office of Naval Records and Library, 1897–1917, Record Group (RG) 45. The materials reproduced here constitute a part of those original German documents approved for restitution to the Bundesarchiv following the latter’s request and subsequent negotiations with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For these German documents, microfilm publication M2089 represents the record copy retained by NARA. BACKGROUND President John Adams authorized the establishment of the Navy Department Library on March 31, 1800. Originally a component of the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Navy Department Library was transferred by Navy Department General Order 292 on March 23, 1882, to the newly established Office of Naval Intelligence. There an unofficial adjunct staff to the Library, designated the Naval War Records Office, came into being in 1882 to compile for publication selected documents on naval aspects of the Civil War. On July 7, 1884, the Naval War Records Office and the Navy Department Library were formally consolidated by the Naval Appropriation Act (23. Stat. 185) into the Office of Library and Naval War Records. In October 1889 the Office was returned to the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, and assumed custody of the pre-1886 office files of the Secretary of the Navy.
    [Show full text]