GREENTECH 2017! - ABC Recycling - Glencore There’S Less Than a Month Left to Green Marine’S Annual Conference, Greentech 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CANADA MARINE ACT | Review Publications Related to the Canada Marine Act
TP14107B CANADA MARINE ACT | review Publications related to the Canada Marine Act: TP13937 – Review of the Canada Marine Act - Guidance Document (May 2002) Please direct your comments, orders and inquiries to: Transport Canada Marine Policy (ACF) Place de Ville Tower C, 25th Floor, Area B 330 Sparks Street Ottawa ON K1A 0N5 Telephone: (613) 991-3536 Fax: (613) 998-1845 E-mail: [email protected] This document is available online at www.tc.gc.ca © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, (Transport Canada) 2003 ISBN 0-662-67359-X Catalogue No. T22-120/2003 TP14107B (06/2003) *TP14107B* THE CANADA MARINE ACT – BEYOND TOMORROW Report of the Review Panel to the Minister of Transport CANADA MARINE ACT | review TO THE HONOURABLE MINISTER OF TRANSPORT Dear Minister: In accordance with your request of May 26, 2002, that the Canada Marine Act Review Panel undertake consultations with marine stakeholders pursuant to the review specified in section 144 of the Canada Marine Act (CMA) and your Terms of Reference for the review, the CMA Review Panel is pleased to present to you its Final Report – Canada Marine Act: Beyond Tomorrow. Respectfully submitted, Richard Gaudreau Allan Donaldson Chair David Gardiner Frank Metcalf, Q.C. 3 CANADA MARINE ACT | review Table of Contents introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................7 chapter 1 | THE REVIEW PROCESS AND THE PANEL’S MANDATE .............................................................11 -
Introduction to Info Source
Introduction to Info Source Info Source: Sources of Federal Government and Employee Information provides information about the functions, programs, activities and related information holdings of government institutions subject to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. It provides individuals and employees of the government (current and former) with relevant information to access personal information about themselves held by government institutions subject to the Privacy Act and to exercise their rights under the Privacy Act. The Introduction and an index of institutions subject to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act are available centrally. The Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act assign overall responsibility to the President of Treasury Board (as the designated Minister) for the government-wide administration of the legislation. GENERAL INFORMATION Background The Halifax Port Authority was created on May 1, 1999 by letters patent issued on that date by the Minister of Transport pursuant to Section 8 of the Canada Marine Act. Therefore, the Halifax Port Authority is a Canadian Port Authority and an agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada within the framework of the Canada Marine Act. The Port of Halifax is a major contributor to the economy of Nova Scotia and is a national asset connecting importers and exporters with global markets. The Halifax Port Authority is governed by a Board of Directors, and reports to Parliament through the Minister of Transport. Additional information related to the Port, its history, and mandate can be found here. Responsibilities The Halifax Port Authority is responsible for the development, marketing and management of its assets in order to foster and promote trade and transportation. -
Expiring Contracts January 1, 2021 — December 31, 2021 Contract Company Union Expiry
Volume 53, Issue 1, Feb/Mar 2021 EXPIRING CONTRACTS JANUARY 1, 2021 — DECEMBER 31, 2021 CONTRACT COMPANY UNION EXPIRY PRIVATE SECTOR United Food & Commercial Workers Rossdown Farms and Natural Foods 2021-01-24 Union AJ Forsyth (Russell Metals) United Steelworkers 2021-01-31 Coast Coal Harbour Hotel Unifor 2021-01-31 Ideal Gear and Machine Works United Steelworkers 2021-01-31 Mitchell Press Unifor (MediaUnion) 2021-01-31 Ringball Corporation and Vanguard United Steelworkers 2021-01-31 Steel Ltd. British Columbia Government & Servomation/Centerplate Inc. 2021-01-31 Service Employees' Union The Hudson's Bay Company United Steelworkers 2021-01-31 British Columbia Government & Union Bay Credit Union 2021-01-31 Service Employees' Union British Columbia Government & Canadian Diabetes Association 2021-02-17 Service Employees' Union British Columbia Government & Freshwater Fisheries Society 2021-02-17 Service Employees' Union Marine Workers and Boilermakers Allied Shipbuilders Limited Industrial Union Local 1, Pipe Fitters 2021-02-28 UA, Local 170, IBEW Local 213 Interior Savings Credit Union British Columbia Government & 2021-02-28 (Thompson) Service Employees' Union International Union of Operating Lafarge Asphalt Technologies 2021-02-28 Engineers International Brotherhood of Seaspan Victoria Shipyards Co Ltd. 2021-02-28 Boilermakers Sprott Shaw Language (formerly KGIC Education and Training Employees' 2021-02-28 Language College) Association Cascade Aerospace Unifor 2021-03-30 IATSE 891, Teamsters 155, BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions International -
Seaspan Collective Agreement to February 2021
LLECTIVE A EM NT between VICTORIA SHIPYARDS CO LTD and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS, FORGERS AND HELPERS, LODGE 191 Victoria BC March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2021 1 1. UNION RECOGNITION The Company recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative of all unionized employees involved in performing work at and from the Company's operations at the Esquimalt Graving Dock. The Company agrees that it will not enter into any agreement, verbal or written, with any employee which is in conflict with any of the provisions of this Collective Agreement. 2. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS The Union recognizes that the management and operation of the Company and the direction of the work force is vested exclusively in the Employer. 3. UNION REPRESENTATIVES (a) The Representatives of the Unions may have access to the work site(s) where employees are working by requesting such access through the Employee Relations Manager or designate. Union representatives will not interfere with any employee's assigned work. Access to the work site(s) will not be unreasonably withheld. (b) A Union representative shall be present at any disciplinary meeting and/or investigative meeting that may lead to disciplinary action against any member of the bargaining unit. 4. UNION SECURITY (a) Each employee covered by this agreement shall, as a condition of employment, be and remain or become and remain a member of the Union. (b) When the Company requires employees, it shall request the Union to refer suitable members. In cases where the Company rejects individuals it does not consider qualified and suitable, the Union will be notified in writing of the reasons for rejection and the Union shall promptly furnish a replacement. -
Toronto Port Authority Practices and Procedures Within the Limits of the Port & Harbour of Toronto
TORONTO PORT AUTHORITY PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PORT & HARBOUR OF TORONTO as at June 2000 PREAMBLE These Practices and Procedures are made pursuant to the Canada Marine Act Section 56, Subsection (1) (b), and are intended to promote safe and efficient navigation, and environmental protection in the waters of the Port of Toronto. Under Section 59 Subsection (1) (a), it is an offense if a person or ship does not follow these practices and procedures. The waters of the Port of Toronto are those waters within the port limits as defined in the Letters Patent for the Port of Toronto as shown on Canadian navigation chart 2085. These Practices and Procedures are to be followed by all vessels entering, manoeuvering, berthed, or anchored within the port limits. SHORT TITLE 1. These Practices & Procedures may be cited as the Toronto Port Authority Practices and Procedures. INTERPRETATION 2. In these Practices & Procedures: “ACT” means the Canada Marine Act. “AUTHORITY” means the Toronto Port Authority. “DESIGNATED AREA” means an area designated by the Authority in respect of an activity. “OFFICER” means a person employed or designated by the Authority to direct some phase of operation or use within the port limits. “OVERALL LENGTH” means the horizontal distance measured between perpendicular lines drawn at the overall extreme after ends of a vessel. “PLEASURE CRAFT” means a vessel, however propelled, that is used exclusively for pleasure and that does not carry passengers who paid a fare for passage. “REPRESENTATIVE” means the Master, Owner or Charterer of a vessel or an agent of either of them and includes any person who in the operation of that vessel within the port limits of the Authority accepts responsibility for payment of fees under the Act to be assessed against that vessel. -
Seaspan ULC Outfitting Pier Extension Project
Seaspan Vancouver Shipyards Outfitting Pier Extension Appendix L CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Vancouver Shipyards Outfitting Pier Extension 10 Pemberton Avenue, North Vancouver, BC Construction Environmental Management Plan PER No. 20-034 Seaspan ULC November 18, 2020 Table of Contents Seaspan ULC ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 SEASPAN OUTFITTING PIER LOCATION ....................................................... 1 1.2 SEASPAN SHIPYARD BASIN DESCRIPTION.................................................. 4 1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS ................................................................................... 4 1.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE ......................................................................................... 4 1.5 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SETTING ................................................................. 5 2.0 RELEVANT ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION ............................................ 6 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ................................................................ 8 3.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ...................................................................... 9 3.1.1 RESPONSIBILITIES OF SEASPAN’S ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ............................................................................................................ 9 3.1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES OF SEASPAN’S PROJECT -
To: Mayor and Council City of Delta COUNCIL REPORT Regular
City of Delta COUNCIL REPORT F.06 Regular Meeting To: Mayor and Council File No. : 1160-01 From : Engineering Department Date: August 01, 2018 World Conference on Cities and Ports Delegation Report The following report has been reviewed and endorsed by the Acting City Manager. • RECOMMENDATION: THAT this report be received for information. • PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to provide information on Delta's delegation to the 16th World Conference on Cities and Ports in Quebec City. • BACKGROUND: At the invitation of the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, the City of Delta sent a delegation to the 16th World Conference on Cities and Ports in Quebec City June 11-14, 2018, organized by AIVP and Port Quebec. AIVP is a France-based international non profit association that was established in 1988 with the main objective of improving dialogue between cities, ports, and their partners. The conference brought together policy makers, business professionals, and academics from around the world to explore the challenges facing port cities and solutions to those challenges adopted by successful port cities with a focus on sustainability. Delta's delegation included Mayor Lois E. Jackson; Steven Lan, Acting City Manager; and Paul Scholfield, Fire Chief and had been pre-approved by Council at the May 14 Regular Meeting. The Port of Vancouver delegation was led by Robin Silvester, President and CEO and Eugene Kwan, Vice Chair, Port of Vancouver Board of Directors. • DISCUSSION: Conference Summary The focus of Delta's delegation to the conference was to engage in dialogue about the port-city interface in other jurisdictions, review best practices from other parts of the world, and develop ideas for potential improvements in Delta. -
Relationships Between Container Terminals and Dry Ports
Relationships between Maritime Container Terminals and Dry Ports and their impact on Inter-port competition Master Thesis within: Business Administration – ILSCM Thesis credits: 30 Author: Robert Castrillón Dussán. Supervisor: Leif-Magnus Jensen Jönköping May 14, 2012 INTENTIONALLY BLANK i Acknowledgement _________________________________________________________________________ I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Leif-Magnus Jensen for his support and guidelines. I also want to thank Per Skoglund for his advice and interesting thoughts. Additionally, I want to express my appreciation and gratefulness to all the respondents from the container terminal and dry port industries. Special thanks to the interviewees and respondents of Gothenburg and Jönköping area for their time and valuable contribution to this study. May 2012, Jönköping Robert Castrillón D. ii INTENTIONALLY BLANK iii Master Thesis in Business Administration - ILSCM Programme Title: Relationships between Maritime Container Terminals and Dry Ports and their impact on Inter-port competition Author: Robert Castrillón Dussán Tutor: Assistant Professor Leif-Magnus Jensen Date: 2012-05-14 Subject terms: Container terminals, dry ports, relationship assessment, customer /supplier interaction, inter-port competition, inland integration of port services _________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Globalization of the world’s economy, containerization, intermodalism and specialization have reshaped transport systems and the industries that are considered crucial for the international distribution of goods such as the port industry. Simultaneously, economies of location, economies of scope, economies of scale, optimization of production factors, and clustering of industries have triggered port regionalization and inland integration of port services especially those provided by container terminals. In this integration dry ports have emerged as a vital intermodal platform for the effective and efficient distribution of containerized cargo. -
Annual Report 2012-Soaring to New Heights.Pdf
Administration portuaire de Québec Direction générale / Communications et relations publiques 150, rue Dalhousie, C.P. 80, Succursale Haute-Ville Québec (Québec) G1R 4M8 Canada Tél.: 418 648-3640 Fax: 418 648-4160 [email protected] www.portquebec.ca www.marinaportquebec.ca www.espacesdalhousie.com Design graphique : safran.ca SOARING TO NEW HEIGHTS 2012 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE QUÉBEC PORT AUTHORITY The mission of the Québec Port Authority (QPA) is to encourage and develop maritime trade, to serve the economic interests of the Québec region and Canada, and to ensure its profitability while respecting the community and the environment. The Québec Port Authority is a financially autonomous shared governance organization constituted under the Canada Marine Act to effectively manage all assets in its purview. The QPA oversees a section of the river measuring 35 square kilometers, and nearly 210 hectares of developed port land. 2012 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE QUÉBEC PORT AUTHORITY Photo courtesy: Louis Rhéaume, pilot for CLSLP CONTENTS 4 The Port of Québec by numbers 4 Handled tonnage 5 Cruises 5 Investments 5 Jobs creation 5 Events 7 A word from the Chairman of the Board 11 A word from the President and CEO 15 The Port of Québec, a gateway to the World 16 Maritime trade routes at a glance 19 A Favourite Port of Call for Cruise Passengers 19 Unprecedented passenger traffic 20 A port like no other 20 Casting its seductive charm 23 A One-of-a-kind Urban Space 23 A marina in the heart of town 24 The unique espaces dalhousie 26 Major event partners -
Falling Short: Suboptimal Outcomes in Canadian Defence Procurement
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-09-26 Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement MacMillan, Ian MacMillan, I. (2018). Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/33132 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108780 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement by Ian MacMillan A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2018 © Ian MacMillan 2018 Abstract Why do Canada’s military procurement projects often fall short of their primary goals? Otherwise known as a suboptimal result, defence acquisitions regularly fall short of established delivery schedules, accruing cost-overruns, sometimes resulting in cancellation of key materiel. One-hundred percent of the twenty-five Major Crown Projects at the Department of National Defence have experienced delays in achieving key milestones. Aside from cost, suboptimal results are injurious to Canada’s tri-force military. Fortunately, the matter has not gone unchecked. A fairly recent surge in procurement research has generated a critical mass of Canadian-focused literature. -
The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing
The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence Stephen Fuhr Chair June 2017 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission. -
Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System
Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 42 Issue 1 Article 13 2018 Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System Mike Piskur Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj Part of the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Mike Piskur, Management of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System, 42 Can.-U.S. L.J. 228 (2018) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj/vol42/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canada-United States Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 228 CANADA-UNITED STATES LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 42, 2018] MANAGEMENT OF THE GREAT LAKES-ST. LAWRENCE MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Mike Piskur† ABSTRACT: The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Maritime Transportation System (“MTS”) bears critical importance to the economic competitiveness of Canada and the United States (“US”). Maritime transportation comprises both a major economic driver and job creator for both countries. As a cost-effective and highly efficient means of transporting raw materials and finished products to market, the MTS is essential to agricultural, mining, and manufacturing supply chains that frequently stretch across the US-Canada border and beyond. Yet management of the MTS is fragmented, with responsibility for various system components scattered across numerous federal agencies in both the US and Canada. This fragmentation results in a dearth of transparency, confusing and disjointed governmental authority, higher user costs, barriers to establishing new markets, and overall reduced system competitiveness.