DOCSLIB.ORG

Munglinup Graphite Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Munglinup Graphite Project Munglinup Graphite Project Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment Munglinup, Oldfield and Young River Corridors For MRC Graphite Pty Ltd Munglinup Graphite Project Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment Munglinup, Oldfield and Young River Corridors Prepared by Nathan McQuoid, McQuoid Ecology and Design 20 Short Beach Rd Bremer Bay WA 6338, and Simon Neville, Ecotones and Associates, Bell Rd William Bay WA 6333 Cover image: Broad-scale Vegetation and Habitat Map, Broad-scale Vegetation Survey, 2020 This report is to be treated as confidential and may not be reproduced in part or whole by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying, recording or any information storage system without the express permission of McQuoid Ecology and Design, Ecotones and Associates, Integrate Sustainability Pty Ltd or MRC Graphite Pty Ltd. This document should be cited as ‘McQuoid N. and Neville S. (2020) Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment: Munglinup, Oldfield and Young River Corridors. Munglinup Graphite Project, MRC Graphite Pty Ltd’ Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment Report 2 Munglinup Graphite Project Report revision Report version Date Comment MRC Ecological Linkages DRAFT 1 1 July 2020 Provided to ISPL and MR RG MRC Ecological Linkages DRAFT 2 9 July 2020 Provided to ISPL MRC Ecological Linkages FINAL 10 July 2020 Provided to ISPL Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment Report 3 Munglinup Graphite Project Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1.1 Background 11 1.2 Study Area 12 1.3 Assessment Design 14 1.3.1 Ecological Linkage/Biodiversity Corridor Assessment 14 1.3.2 Linkage Conservation Value Assessment 14 1.3.3 Linkage Physical Assessment 15 1.3.4 Composite Linkage Assessment 16 1.4 Modelling Methodology (MCAS-S) 18 1.5 Least Cost path as a linkage assessment tool 19 1.6 Personnel 19 2 METHODS 20 2.1 Desktop Study 20 2.2 Assessment Criteria 21 2.3 Field Assessment 24 2.4 Vegetation and Habitat Mapping 25 2.5 Determination of corridor use by fauna 25 2.6 MCAS-S Data Preparation 26 2.7 Linkage Comparative Assessment 26 2.8 Linkage Physical Assessment 27 3 LIMITATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS 31 4 RESULTS 33 4.1 Desktop Study 33 4.2 Field assessment 39 4.3 Broad-scale Vegetation Mapping 40 4.4 Linkage Physical Assessment 43 4.4.1 Linkage Values 43 4.4.2 Linkage Patch Values 43 Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment Report 4 Munglinup Graphite Project 4.5 MCAS-S Value Modelling 46 4.5.1 Pre-Mine MCAS-S – Data Layers 46 4.5.2 Pre-Mine MCAS-S – Composite (Results) Layers 58 4.5.3 Post Mine MCAS-S – Data Layers 60 4.5.4 Post-Mine MCAS-S – Composite (Results) Layers 61 4.6 Linkage Value Assessment 63 4.6.1 Composite Linkage Values Map 64 4.6.2 Least Cost Path (LCP) 65 5 DISCUSSION 69 5.1 Desktop Study 69 5.2 Assessment Criteria 70 5.3 Field Assessment 70 5.4 Broad-scale Vegetation and Habitat Mapping 71 5.5 MCAS-S & LCP Linkage Values Assessment 71 5.6 Potential Management Measures 72 6 REFERENCES 73 7 APPENDICES 77 7.1 Appendix 1. Field Assessment Relevé Site and Ecological Data 78 7.2 Appendix 2. Study Area Broad-scale Vegetation and Habitat Map: Munglinup, Oldfield and Young River Linkage Corridors 79 Ecological Linkages/Biodiversity Corridors Impact Assessment Report 5 Munglinup Graphite Project List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2: Oldfield, Munglinup and Young River Linkage Outlines showing remnant vegetation and Mine Project Outline .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 3: Assessment Model Top-Level Conceptual Framework .......................................................................... 17 Figure 4: Assessment Model Detailed Framework ............................................................................................... 23 Figure 5: Linkage outlines as provided, showing DPIRD classified native vegetation .......................................... 28 Figure 6: Linkage outlines as amended, showing DPIRD classified native vegetation.......................................... 28 Figure 7: Munglinup Linkage Boundary showing the Mine Project Outline – as used for the before- and after- mine scenarios ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 8: Relevé Survey Sites showing Project Development Boundary .............................................................. 39 Figure 9: Broad-scale Vegetation Mapping – Overall Community Types ............................................................. 41 Figure 10: Broad-scale Vegetation Mapping – Presence of TEC ........................................................................... 41 Figure 11: Broad-scale Vegetation Mapping – Vegetation Condition .................................................................. 42 Figure 12: Proportions of Community/Vegetation types in Munglinup Linkage – Pre and Post Mine. ............... 43 Figure 13: Pre-Mine Assessment of Composite Linkage Value - MCAS-S Diagram .............................................. 46 Figure 14: Criterion - Linkage Value ...................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 15: Layer – Linkage Length ........................................................................................................................ 47 Figure 16: Layer – Linkage Area ............................................................................................................................ 48 Figure 17: Layer – Linkage Average Width ........................................................................................................... 48 Figure 18: Layer – Linkage Gaps ........................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 19: Criterion – Patch Value ........................................................................................................................ 49 Figure 20: Layer – Patch Exposure ........................................................................................................................ 50 Figure 21: Layer – Patch Average Width ............................................................................................................... 50 Figure 22: Layer – Patch Area ............................................................................................................................... 51 Figure 23: Criterion - Naturalness ......................................................................................................................... 51 Figure 24: Layer - Condition .................................................................................................................................. 52 Figure 25: Layer – Weed Presence ....................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 26: Layer - Distance to Cleared Land ......................................................................................................... 53 Figure 27: Criterion - Rarity .................................................................................................................................. 54 Figure 28: Composite Layer – Threatened Species ............................................................................................... 54 Figure 29: Layer – Threatened Species ................................................................................................................. 55 Figure 30: Layer – Distance to flora ...................................................................................................................... 55 Figure 31: Layer – Distance to Fauna .................................................................................................................... 56 Figure 32: Layer – Potential TEC ........................................................................................................................... 56 Figure 33: Layer – Community Area ..................................................................................................................... 57 Figure 34: Criterion - Diversity .............................................................................................................................. 57 Figure 35: Pre-Mine Physical Assessment Composite .......................................................................................... 58 Figure 36: Pre-Mine Biological Value Composite ................................................................................................. 59 Figure 37: Pre-Mine Composite Linkage Value Map ............................................................................................ 60 Figure 38: Post-Mine Assessment of Composite Linkage Value - MCAS-S Diagram ............................................. 61 Figure 39: Post Mine Physical Assessment ........................................................................................................... 62 Figure 40: Post-Mine Biological Value Component .............................................................................................. 62 Figure 41: Post-Mine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Genus Egernia (Lacertilia, Scincidae) in Western Australia
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus., 1978,6 (2) THE GENUS EGERNIA (LACERTILIA, SCINCIDAE) IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA G.M. STORR* [Received 27 October 1976. Accepted 5 May 1977. Published 30 June 1978.] ABSTRACT The 17 species and subspecies of Egernia occurring in Western Australia are described and keyed, viz. E. depressa (Giinther), E. stokesii stokesii (Gray), E. stokesii aethiops nov., E. stokesii badia nov., E. kingii (Gray) [syn. E. nitida (Gray)], E. napoleonis (Gray) [E. nitida of authors, not Gray], E. carinata H.M. Smith, E. formosa Fry, E. douglasi Glauert, E. luctuosa (Peters) [syn. E. lauta DeVis], E. pilbarensis nov., E. pulchrapulchra Werner, E. pulchra longicauda Ford, E. multiscutata bos Storr, E. inornata Rosen, E. striata Sternfeld, E. kintorei Stirling & Zietz. A lectotype is designated for Tropidolopisma dumerilii Dumeril & Bibron [= E. kingii]. The Victorian representative of E. luctuosa is described as a new species, E. coventryi. INTRODUCTION This paper brings up to date an earlier revision of the Egernia whitii group (Storr, 1968) and deals for the first time since Mitchell (1950) with the other western members of the genus. It is based on specimens in the Western Australian Museum (registered numbers cited without prefix). I have also used some specimens in the National Museum of Victoria (numbers prefixed with NMV), Australian Museum (AM), Queensland Museum (QM), collec­ tion of the British Joint Services Expedition to Central Australia (JSE), and British Museum (Natural History), for the loan of which I am indebted to Mr A.J. Coventry, Dr H.G. Cogger, Miss J. Covacevich, Lt-Cdr A.Y. Norris and Mr A.F.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Region Regional Management Plan
    SOUTH COAST REGION REGIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 1992 - 2002 MANAGEMENT PLAN NO. 24 Department of Conservation and Land Management for the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority and the Lands and Forest Commission Western Australia PREFACE Regional management plans are prepared by the Department of Conservation and Land Management on behalf of the Lands and Forest Commission and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority. These two bodies submit the plans for final approval and modification, if required, by the Minister for the Environment. Regional plans are to be prepared for each of the 10 regions administered by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). This plan for the South Coast Region covers all lands and waters in the Region vested under the CALM Act, together with wildlife responsibilities included in the Wildlife Conservation Act. In addition to the Regional Plan, more detailed management plans will be prepared for certain critical management issues, (the most serious of which is the spread of dieback disease in the Region); particular high value or high conflict areas, (such as some national parks); or for certain exploited or endangered species, (such as kangaroos and the Noisy Scrub-bird). These plans will provide more detailed information and guidance for management staff. The time frame for this Regional Plan is ten years, although review and restatement of some policies may be necessary during this period. Implementation will take place progressively over this period and there will be continuing opportunity for public comment. This management plan was submitted by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and adopted by the Lands and Forest Commission on 12 June 1991 and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority on 19 July 1991 and approved by the Minister for the Environment on 23 December 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • (Centrolepidaceae) in Australia
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 15(1): 1-63 (1992) A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF CENTROLEPIS (CENTROLEPIDACEAE) IN AUSTRALIA D. A. Cooke Animal and Plant Control Commission of South Australia GPO Box 1671, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Abstract Centrdepis in Australia is revised and twenty species are recognised. This revision is based on morphological features that are discussed in relation to the biology of the genus. One new species, C. curta, and a new subspecies, C. strigosa subsp. rupestris, are described and illustrated. The new combinations C. monogyna subsp. paludicola and C. strigosa subsp. pulvinata are made. Introduction Centrolepis is a genus of small annual and perennial monocots. It forms, with Aphelia and Gaimardia, the minor family Centrolepidaceae. The family has its main centre of diversity in Australia with 29 species; a few occur in New Zealand, south-eastern Asia and South America. The close affinity of the Centrolepidaceae to the Restionaceae, and its remoteness from the two genera segregated by Hamann (1976) as the Hydatellaceae, are widely recognised in contemporary systems of classification (Cronquist, 1981; Dahlgren & Clifford, 1982; Takhtajan, 1980). Taxonomic history The genus first became known from material of the near-coastal species sent to Europe by the early botanist-explorers and collectors. In 1770 Banks and Solander on the Endeavour collected specimens of Centrolepis, now referred to C. banksii and C. exserta, that they tentatively labelled as species of Schoenus (Cyperaceae). Labillardière (1804) based the new genus Centrolepis, which he placed under Monandria Monogynia in the Linnaean system, on a Tasmanian specimen. Robert Brown (1810), using Banks' and Solander's material and his own collections from the voyage of the Investigator around Australia in 1801-4, drafted manuscript epithets for a further twelve Centrolepis species.
    [Show full text]
  • DMP Annual Report 1955
    COVER PICTURE The cover picture shows the Sons of Gwalia Gold Mine at Leonora. In the foreground of the picture are the staff houses and swimming pool. In the centre can be seen the plant, mine buildings and the head~frame, with" the open cut in the background. This is the oldest mine in Western Australia having been worked continuously since 1897. It has produced 6,063,460' 53 tons of ore for 2,362,405 fine ozs. of gold. WESTERN AUSTRALIA - 1957 1-;::============================ OF THE e artm nt of In s FOR THE YEAR 1955 I I PERTH: By Authority: WllLlAM H. WYATT, Government Printer 1957 3974'3'57-625 To the Hon. Minister for Mines. Sir, I have the honour to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Mines of the State of Western Australia for the year 1955, together with reports from the officers controlling Sub-Departments, and Comparative Tables furnishing statistics relative to the Mining Industry. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, A. H. TELFER, Under Secretary for Mines. Perth, April, 1956. TABLE Of CONTENTS DIVISION I. Page Part I.-General Remarks 7 Output of Gold during 1955 7 Mining generally 7 Minerals .... 8 Coal 8 00 8 Part Il.-Minerals Raised.... 9 Quantity and Value of Minerals produced during 1954-55 .... .... 9 Value and Percentage of Mineral Exports compared with Total Exports 10 Amount of Gold from every Goldfield reported to Mines Department 11 Gold Ore raised and average per man employed .... .... .... 11 Output of Gold from other States of Australia, Mandated Territory of New Guinea, and New Zealand 12 Dividends paid by Mining Companies during 1955 12 Minerals, other than Gold, reported to ~1ines Department 14 Coal raised, Value, number of Men employed, and Output per man 15 Part IlL-Leases and other Holdings under the Various Acts relating to Mining- Number and Acreage of Leases held for ~ning 15 Part IV.-Men Employed- Average Number of Men engaged in ~1ining during 1954-55 16 Part V.-Accidents- Men killed and injured during 1954-55 17 Part VL-State Aid to Mining- State Batteries ...
    [Show full text]
  • Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd Company Profile
    BRAD GOODE & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD COMPANY PROFILE A Tender Document prepared for the provision of ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SERVICES May 2018 CONTENTS IDENTITY OF RESPONDENT .................................................................................................. 3 COMPANY PROFILE ................................................................................................................ 4 PURPOSE AND AIM OF THE COMPANY .................................................................................. 4 PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL & ASSOCIATES ..................................................................... 4 SERVICES OF THE COMPANY ................................................................................................... 6 REFEREES ................................................................................................................................ 7 CURRICULUM VITAE OF PERSONNEL ................................................................................. 8 MR BRAD GOODE .......................................................................................................................... 8 MS LOUISE HUXTABLE ................................................................................................................. 9 MR GRANT PRELLER .................................................................................................................. 10 MRS JACQUELINE HARRIS ....................................................................................................... 11 MR TOM O’REILLY ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan
    FITZGERALD BIOSPHERE RECOVERY PLAN A landscape approach to threatened species and ecological communities for recovery and biodiversity conservation South Coast Region Department of Environment and Conservation This Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan has been prepared by Janet Newell, Sarah Comer and Deon Utber for the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation. This Plan should be cited as follows: Department of Environment and Conservation, (2012). Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan: A Landscape Approach to Threatened Species and Ecological Communities Recovery and Biodiversity Conservation, Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation, Albany. Cover photos: top left – Eucalyptus nutans (Sarah Barrett) top middle – Western Ground Parrot (Brent Barrett) top right – Eucalyptus burdettiana (Sarah Barrett) bottom – Fitzgerald River National Park (Sarah Comer) Department of Environment and Conservation South Coast Region 120 Albany Highway Albany WA 6330. FORWARD This Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan constitutes the formal national regional recovery plan for 11 flora species and provides recovery guidance for the remaining species and ecological communities largely endemic to the Fitzgerald Biosphere on the south coast of Western Australia that are listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The Fitzgerald River National Park (FRNP) was designated a Biosphere Reserve under the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme in 1978, and is recognised for its relatively pristine state and high biological diversity, especially its flora. For the purpose of this plan, the term ‘Fitzgerald Biosphere’ or ‘Biosphere’ refers to the combination of the core Biosphere area as recognised by MAB and the buffer and transition zones as defined by catchment boundaries as shown in figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuytsia the Journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 22(6): 409–454 Published Online 18 December 2012
    D. Nicolle & M.E. French, A revision of Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae from south-western Australia 409 Nuytsia The journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 22(6): 409–454 Published online 18 December 2012 A revision of Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae (Myrtaceae) from south-western Australia, including the description of new taxa and comments on the probable hybrid origin of E. balanites, E. balanopelex and E. phylacis Dean Nicolle1,3 and Malcolm E. French2 1Currency Creek Arboretum, PO Box 808, Melrose Park, South Australia 5039 229 Stonesfield Court, Padbury, Western Australia 6025 3Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract Nicolle, D. & French, M.E. A revision of Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae (Myrtaceae) from south-western Australia, including the description of new taxa and comments on the probable hybrid origin of E. balanites, E. balanopelex and E. phylacis. Nuytsia 22(6): 409–454 (2012). Twenty terminal taxa (including 18 species) are recognised in Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae. Brooker & Hopper. We include the monotypic E. ser. Cooperianae L.A.S.Johnson ex Brooker (E. cooperiana F.Muell.) in the series. The new species E. annettae D.Nicolle & M.E.French and E. opimiflora D.Nicolle & M.E.French and the new subspecies E. goniantha Turcz. subsp. kynoura D.Nicolle & M.E.French are described. New combinations made are E. adesmophloia (Brooker & Hopper) D.Nicolle & M.E.French, E. ecostata (Maiden) D.Nicolle & M.E.French and E. notactites (L.A.S.Johnson & K.D.Hill) D.Nicolle & M.E.French. The circumscription of some taxa is significantly modified from previous accounts, including that of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Prioritisation of Waterways for Management In
    Framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia May 2011 Report no. CENRM120 Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia Unit 1, Foreshore House, Proudlove Parade Albany Western Australia 6332 Telephone +61 8 9842 0837 Facsimile +61 8 9842 8499 www.cenrm.uwa.edu.au This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the University of Western Australia. Reference: Macgregor, C., Cook, B., Farrell, C. and Mazzella, L. 2011. Assessment framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia, Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia, Albany. ISBN: 978-1-74052-236-6 Front cover credit: Bremer River, Eastern South Coast bioregion in May 2006, looking downstream by Geraldine Janicke. Disclaimer This document has been prepared by the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia for the Department of Water, Western Australian. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchments of the Esperance Region of Western Australia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia (DAFWA): Research Library Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1997 Catchments of the Esperance region of Western Australia S T. Gee John Andrew Simons Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Gee, S T, and Simons, J A. (1997), Catchments of the Esperance region of Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Report 165. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ISSN 0729-3135 January 1997 Catchments of the Esperance Region of Western Australia Prepared by: S.T. Gee and J.A. Simons Department of Agriculture Esperance, Western Australia Resource Management Technical Report No. 165 CATCHMENTS OF THE ESPERANCE REGION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Disclaimer The contents of this report were based on the best available information at the time of publication. It is based in part on various assumptions and predictions. Conditions may change over time and conclusions should be interpreted in the light of the latest information available.
    [Show full text]
  • Ravensthorpe Area Catchment Appraisal 2006
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1-1-2006 Ravensthorpe area catchment appraisal 2006 A Massenbauer Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, Hydrology Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Massenbauer, A. (2006), Ravensthorpe area catchment appraisal 2006. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth. Report 311. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 1039-7205 Resource Management Technical Report 311 Ravensthorpe Area CATCHMENT APPRAISAL 2006 Compiled by Angela Massenbauer for the Esperance–Ravensthorpe Catchment Support Team September 2006 DISCLAIMER: The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture & Food and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. © State of Western Australia, 2006 RAVENSTHORPE AREA APPRAISAL Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Wetland Sample Site
    Summary of Wetland Sample Sites This table has a list of the sites from the Database where wetland sampling has been conducted. It also shows what type of sampling was carried out at each site. You can search for your site of interest by: 1. Filter the list by Data Source or Sampling Type (use the filter buttons) OR 2. Search for a site name using the Find tool (Ctrl + f). Note that even if your site is not listed here you can search for it on the database where you will find other useful information related to your site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Pallinup Report 2017
    Actions for the Pallinup: Middle Pallinup Floodway Condition Survey - 2017 Actions for the Pallinup Middle Pallinup Floodway Condition Survey November 2017 "My old people used to tell me that the Pallinup was a special river" Aden Eades, Stories of the Pallinup River and Beaufort Inlet 2002. Report prepared by Steve & Geraldine Janicke for North Stirling Pallinup Natural Resource Inc Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following people for their assistance in facilitating the river field survey and for their observations of the river. Project managers for NSPNR Inc; Ellie Stone and Andrea Le Page Landholders: Michael Lance, Colin Garnett, Elliot Richardson, Peter and Lyndall Hanbury, Freddy Gaze, Jason Stone, Peter Stone and Richard Milne. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation for relevant river data. This project received funding from the Western Australian Government’s State NRM Program, supported by Royalties for Regions program. Citation For bibliographical purposes this report should be cited as; Janicke, S. & Janicke, G. (2017). Actions for the Pallinup: Middle Pallinup Floodway Condition Survey. Report prepared for North Stirlings Pallinup Natural Resource Inc. The project title is: Actions for the Pallinup; Demonstrating Improvements in Water Condition. Community Action Grant 2016 - A16005. Disclaimer: The authors have in good faith, made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information presented and to acknowledge the sources, subject to the limitations of the methods used and take no responsibility for how this information is used subsequently by others, including implied notions and conclusions drawn. Management implications are not recommendations, but present options for consideration and discussion. Cover graphics Janicke All photographs are copyright to Steve and Geraldine Janicke unless otherwise acknowledged.
    [Show full text]