DOCSLIB.ORG

Framework for Prioritisation of Waterways for Management In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Framework for Prioritisation of Waterways for Management In Framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia May 2011 Report no. CENRM120 Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia Unit 1, Foreshore House, Proudlove Parade Albany Western Australia 6332 Telephone +61 8 9842 0837 Facsimile +61 8 9842 8499 www.cenrm.uwa.edu.au This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the University of Western Australia. Reference: Macgregor, C., Cook, B., Farrell, C. and Mazzella, L. 2011. Assessment framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia, Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia, Albany. ISBN: 978-1-74052-236-6 Front cover credit: Bremer River, Eastern South Coast bioregion in May 2006, looking downstream by Geraldine Janicke. Disclaimer This document has been prepared by the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia for the Department of Water, Western Australian. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. The report was prepared by Colin Macgregor, Barbara Cook and Claire Farrell from the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management at the University of Western Australia and Lisa Mazzella from the Department of Water. In-kind contributions were gratefully received from natural resource management (NRM) organisations Perth NRM Incorporated, Wheatbelt NRM Incorporated, Northern Agricultural Catchments Council, South West Catchments Council, South Coast NRM Incorporated and the Rangelands NRM Coordinating Group represented on the Technical Reference Group and the steering committee. The following people are acknowledged for their assistance and support during the project: Verity Klemm and Tim Storer (Department of Water). ii Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................... v Background .................................................................................................................................. v The assessment process ............................................................................................................. v Case studies............................................................................................................................... viii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives of the framework............................................................................................... 3 1.3 Approach adopted for the framework ................................................................................. 3 1.4 Limitations .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Structure of the report ........................................................................................................ 4 2 Elements of the framework ..................................................................................... 5 2.1 Identifying purpose of assessment .................................................................................... 5 2.2 Selecting an appropriate assessment scale ...................................................................... 6 2.3 Identifying values, criteria, indicators and measures ......................................................... 6 2.4 Identifying threats, indicators and measures ..................................................................... 7 2.5 Scoring values and threats ................................................................................................. 9 2.6 Choosing priorities and management responses ............................................................ 10 2.7 Stakeholder engagement and feasibility .......................................................................... 17 2.8 Designing the management response ............................................................................. 18 3 Values, indicators and measures .......................................................................... 20 3.1 Ecological values .............................................................................................................. 20 3.2 Social values .................................................................................................................... 27 3.3 Economic values .............................................................................................................. 32 4 Threats, indicators and measures ......................................................................... 36 4.1 Riparian zone degradation ............................................................................................... 36 4.2 Erosion and sedimentation ............................................................................................... 36 4.3 Eutrophication and deoxygenation ................................................................................... 37 4.4 Inappropriate fire regimes ................................................................................................ 38 4.5 Pollution ............................................................................................................................ 38 4.6 Introduced animal and plant species ............................................................................... 39 4.7 Salinisation and waterlogging .......................................................................................... 40 4.8 Acidification ...................................................................................................................... 41 4.9 Flow alteration .................................................................................................................. 41 4.10 In-stream habitat destruction and fragmentation ............................................................. 42 5 Case studies ......................................................................................................... 44 5.1 Subcatchment scale: Fortescue River (low quality data) ................................................. 44 5.2 Reach scale: Marbellup Brook (high quality data) ........................................................... 65 5.3 Reach scale: Berkeley River (low quality data) ............................................................... 73 5.4 Catchment scale: South Coast region (high quality data) ............................................... 80 6 General comments and conclusions ..................................................................... 96 Appendix A Contacts ........................................................................................... 97 Appendix B Recommended GIS datasets and other sources of information ....... 99 iii Shortened forms ...................................................................................................... 111 Glossary .................................................................................................................. 113 References and further reading ............................................................................... 115 iv Framework for prioritising waterways in Western Australia Summary Summary Background Based on an asset-threat management approach, and taking into account state and national developments in waterway prioritisation, the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management at the University of Western Australia on behalf of the Department of Water has developed a framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia. The framework provides a consistent and transparent approach to setting priorities for management. It ranks waterways in terms of their ecological, social and economic values and also according to their level of threat, and based on these rankings, classifies these waterways into broad categories. Appropriate management responses for each of these categories are proposed. The framework can be used at scales ranging from whole catchments down to individual reaches of a waterway. It can be used in situations where data is limited or plentiful, and of both a qualitative or quantitative nature. It also recognises that some natural resource management regions already have processes for prioritising waterways for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Framework for Prioritising Waterways for Management in Western Australia
    Framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia May 2011 Report no. CENRM120 Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia Unit 1, Foreshore House, Proudlove Parade Albany Western Australia 6332 Telephone +61 8 9842 0837 Facsimile +61 8 9842 8499 www.cenrm.uwa.edu.au This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the University of Western Australia. Reference: Macgregor, C., Cook, B., Farrell, C. and Mazzella, L. 2011. Assessment framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia, Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia, Albany. ISBN: 978-1-74052-236-6 Front cover credit: Bremer River, Eastern South Coast bioregion in May 2006, looking downstream by Geraldine Janicke. Disclaimer This document has been prepared by the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia for the Department of Water, Western Australian. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberley Cruising
    Kimberley Cruising Great Escape The Kimberley is a land of captivating contrast. Discover one of the world’s most amazing untouched wilderness areas and cruise past breathtaking waterfalls and dramatic cliff faces, while relaxing on the deck of your vessel. A Kimberley cruise is an adventure you will never forget! Of course there’s more to the Kimberley coastline than spectacular scenery. Reach for the binoculars to take in the abundance of birdlife and embark on an excursion to see some of the oldest Aboriginal rock art galleries featured in natural caves. As you cruise along the Kimberley coastline, visit some of the most incredible attractions Australia has to offer. Witness the natural phenomenon at Montgomery Reef, where white water rapids reveal a vast reef eco-system. Marvel at the tiered waterfall at King Cascade, on the Prince Regent River and take a thrilling ride through the Horizontal Falls. Spot crocodiles along the Mitchell River and explore the beaches and ancient rock art on Bigge Island. Just sit back, relax and enjoy the breathtaking scenery that will surround you. A whole new world of underwater wonder is yours to enjoy at Rowley Shoals Marine Park, 300 kilometres west of Broome. The coral atolls, clear lagoons and incredible marine life are exceptional. Take a dive on Clerke or Mermaid Reef and be on the lookout for everything from colourful coral gardens to various fish species. Come face to face with sea turtles, manta rays and dolphins. It’s an underwater playground. After a full day of exploring the wilderness, dine on sumptuous fresh food and watch the spectacular Kimberley sunset.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Management of Culham Inlet, a Coastal Salt Lake in South-Western Australia
    JournalJournal of ofthe the Royal Royal Society Society of Westernof Western Australia, Australia, 80(4), 80:239-247, December 1997 1997 History and management of Culham Inlet, a coastal salt lake in south-western Australia E P Hodgkin 86 Adelma Road, Dalkeith, WA 6009 email: [email protected] Manuscript received August 1996; accepted May 1997. Abstract When Culham Inlet was first flooded by the Holocene rise in sea level it was an estuary, but in historic times it has been a salt lake closed by a high sea bar. It is in an area of low rainfall and episodic river flow and sometimes all water is lost by evaporation to below sea level. With above average rainfall in 1989 and 1992, high water levels in the Inlet flooded farm paddocks and threatened to break the bar and a road along it from Hopetoun to the Fitzgerald River National Park. In 1993 the bar was breached to release flood water, and the Inlet was briefly an estuary. Engineering measures designed to restore road access and prevent flooding are examined for their potential to restore the Inlet to its pre-1993 condition of a productive ecosystem. Recent clearing in the catchments of Culham Inlet and nearby estuaries in the south coast low rainfall area has increased river flow to them and appears to have caused their bars to break more frequently. Introduction (Fig 2) that is only known to have broken naturally once, In historic times Culham Inlet has been a coastal in 1849. The bar was broken artificially in 1920, but for lagoon on a semi-arid part of the south coast of Western over 70 years since then the Inlet has absorbed river flow Australia (Fig 1), separated from the sea by a high bar without the bar breaking, until 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Adec Preview Generated PDF File
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus., 1976,4 (2) THE GENUS MENETIA (LACERTILIA, SCINCIDAE) IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA G.M. STORR* [Received 1 July 1975. Accepted 1 October 1975. Published 30 September 1976.] ABSTRACT The Australian genus Menetia comprises at least five species, three of which occur in Western Australia, namely M. greyii Gray, M. maini novo and M. surda novo A lectotype is designated for M. greyii. INTRODUCTION Until recently all skinks with an immovable transparent lower eyelid were placed in Ablepharus. Fuhn (1969) broke up this polyphyletic assemblage, allotting the Australian species to nine groups, including the genus Menetia. Fuhn, and indeed all workers till now, regarded Menetia as monotypic. Greer (1974) believes that Menetia is derived from the genus Carlia. All the material used in this revision is lodged in the Western Australian Museum. Genus Menetia Gray Menetia Gray, 1845, 'Catalogue of the specimens of lizards in the collection ofthe British Museum', p.65. Type-species (by monotypy): M. greyii Gray. * Curator of Birds and Reptiles, W.A. Museum. 189 Diagnosis Very small, smooth, terrestrial skinks with lower eyelid immovable and bearing a large circular transparent disc incompletely surrounded by granules; digits 4 + 5; first supraocular long and narrow and obliqu~ly orientated. Distribution Most of Australia except the wettest and coolest regions. At least five species, three of them in Western Australia. Description Snout-vent length up to 38 mm. Tail fragile, 1.2-2.0 times as long as snout to vent. Nasals usually separated widely. No supranasals or postnasals. Prefrontals usually separated very narrowly. Frontal small, little if any larger than prefrontals.
    [Show full text]
  • Great South West Edge Touring Route Drive One of Australia’S Most Fascinating Landscapes Between Perth and Esperance, Known As the Great South West Edge
    Drive GREAT SOUTH WEST the EDGE EXPERIENCE WESTERN AUSTRALIA’S EXTRAORDINARY LANDSCAPE, IN ONE GREAT ROAD TRIP ALONG THE EDGE. PERTH THE WONDERS OF WA IN ONE GREAT ROAD TRIP 11 day Great South West Edge Touring Route Drive one of Australia’s most fascinating landscapes between Perth and Esperance, known as the Great South West Edge. This unique region comprises many contrasting landscapes; from ancient mountain ranges and rugged granite headlands along the south coast, to the towering karri trees in the Southern Forests and a network of spectacular caves further to the west. The regions’ best attractions are dotted in and around pretty country towns and vast national parks harbouring some of the world’s most unique flora and fauna. This 11 day attraction itinerary gives visitors the option of covering the full route in an action packed 11 days. Optional detour Kalgoorlie routes are included which can extend your trip to accommodate individual travel Coolgardie times. If time is restricted, visitors can select sections of the itinerary to complete or plan Southern Cross to incorporate air travel, with airports in GREAT EASTERN HWY Kambalda Albany and Esperance to reduce travel time. Merredin This 11 day itinerary can easily be extended Northam to cover a longer period as there is so GREAT EASTERN HWY much to see and do along the route. York Perth Fremantle Armadale Y W H Corrigin Norseman HW Y Y W Brookton INDIAN OCEAN H Hyden H Mandurah T North Dandalup U O S Pinjarra H Kulin W Y Yalgorup Waroona National Park Narrogin Williams Harvey
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Egernia (Lacertilia, Scincidae) in Western Australia
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus., 1978,6 (2) THE GENUS EGERNIA (LACERTILIA, SCINCIDAE) IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA G.M. STORR* [Received 27 October 1976. Accepted 5 May 1977. Published 30 June 1978.] ABSTRACT The 17 species and subspecies of Egernia occurring in Western Australia are described and keyed, viz. E. depressa (Giinther), E. stokesii stokesii (Gray), E. stokesii aethiops nov., E. stokesii badia nov., E. kingii (Gray) [syn. E. nitida (Gray)], E. napoleonis (Gray) [E. nitida of authors, not Gray], E. carinata H.M. Smith, E. formosa Fry, E. douglasi Glauert, E. luctuosa (Peters) [syn. E. lauta DeVis], E. pilbarensis nov., E. pulchrapulchra Werner, E. pulchra longicauda Ford, E. multiscutata bos Storr, E. inornata Rosen, E. striata Sternfeld, E. kintorei Stirling & Zietz. A lectotype is designated for Tropidolopisma dumerilii Dumeril & Bibron [= E. kingii]. The Victorian representative of E. luctuosa is described as a new species, E. coventryi. INTRODUCTION This paper brings up to date an earlier revision of the Egernia whitii group (Storr, 1968) and deals for the first time since Mitchell (1950) with the other western members of the genus. It is based on specimens in the Western Australian Museum (registered numbers cited without prefix). I have also used some specimens in the National Museum of Victoria (numbers prefixed with NMV), Australian Museum (AM), Queensland Museum (QM), collec­ tion of the British Joint Services Expedition to Central Australia (JSE), and British Museum (Natural History), for the loan of which I am indebted to Mr A.J. Coventry, Dr H.G. Cogger, Miss J. Covacevich, Lt-Cdr A.Y. Norris and Mr A.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
    Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Search / Rescue
    SEARCH / RESCUE FESA provides a variety of search and rescue services, primarily in support of the Western Australia Police Service. These range from operation of the state’s only dedicated emergency rescue helicopter service to marine search and rescue, in addition to a recently- enhanced capability to deal with casualties of terrorist activities. CONTENTS AERIAL RESCUE 67 CLIFF AND CAVE RESCUE 70 LAND AND AIR SEARCH 72 MARINE SEARCH AND RESCUE 74 ROAD CRASH RESCUE 78 URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE 80 66 FESA ANNUAL REPORT 2005-2006 Aerial rescue RAC Rescue 1 is Western Australia’s only dedicated emergency rescue helicopter. The service provides: • Emergency rescues, eg. For the victims of car crashes, cliff rescues, farming accidents • Ship to shore rescues including responding to Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons • Hospital transfers for critically ill patients. PREPAREDNESS RAC Rescue 1 and its highly trained crew are on standby, ready to fly 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The helicopter is crewed by a pilot, rescue crewman (both supplied under contract by CHC Helicopters Australia) and a St John Ambulance Critical Care Paramedic. Stationed at Jandakot Airport, Perth, RAC Rescue 1 typically operates within a 200km radius, covering 90% of Western Australia’s population or 1.8 million people. The Emergency Rescue Helicopter Service is managed by FESA and is funded by the State Government and principal sponsor, the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia (RAC). Call outs are usually initiated by, or through St John Ambulance, or at the request of the WA Police. Critical life-saving missions take precedence over any other call out.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Annual Report 2005-2006
    About us Contents MINISTER FOR THE Executive Director’s review 2 ENVIRONMENT About us 4 In accordance with Our commitment 4 Section 70A of the Our organisation 7 Financial Administration The year in summary 12 and Audit Act 1985, I submit for your Highlights of 2005-2006 12 Strategic Planning Framework 16 information and presentation to Parliament What we do 18 the final annual report of Nature Conservation – Service 1 18 the Department of Sustainable Forest Management – Service 2 65 Conservation and Land Performance of Statutory Functions by the Conservation Commission Management. of Western Australia (see page 194) – Service 3 Parks and Visitor Services – Service 4 76 Astronomical Services – Service 5 112 General information 115 John Byrne Corporate Services 115 REPORTING CALM-managed lands and waters 118 OFFICER Estate map 120 31 August 2006 Fire management services 125 Statutory information 137 Public Sector Standards and Codes of Conduct 137 Legislation 138 Disability Services 143 EEO and diversity management 144 Electoral Act 1907 145 Energy Smart 146 External funding, grants and sponsorships 147 Occupational safety and health 150 Record keeping 150 Substantive equality 151 Waste paper recycling 151 Publications produced in 2005-2006 152 Performance indicators 174 Financial statements 199 The opinion of the Auditor General appears after the performance indicators departmentofconservationandlandmanagement 1 About us Executive Director’s review The year in review has proved to be significant for the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) for the work undertaken and because it has turned out to be the Department’s final year of operation. The Minister for the Environment announced in May 2006 that CALM would merge with the Department of Environment on 1 July 2006 to form the Department of Environment and Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Guidance for Planning and Development
    Part A Environmental protection and land use planning in Western Australia Environmental Guidance for Part B Biophysical factors Planning and Development Part C Pollution management May 2008 Part D Social surroundings Guidance Statement No. 33 2007389-0508-50 Foreword The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) is an independent statutory authority and is the key provider of independent environmental advice to Government. The EPA’s objectives are to protect the environment and to prevent, control and abate pollution and environmental harm. The EPA aims to achieve some of this through the development of environmental protection guidance statements for the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of proposals. This document is one in a series being issued by the EPA to assist proponents, consultants and the public generally to gain additional information about the EPA’s thinking in relation to aspects of the EIA process. The series provides the basis for EPA’s evaluation of, and advice on, proposals under S38 and S48A of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) subject to EIA. The guidance statements are one part of assisting proponents, decision-making authorities and others in achieving environmentally acceptable outcomes. Consistent with the notion of continuous environmental improvement and adaptive environmental management, the EPA expects proponents to take all reasonable and practicable measures to protect the environment and to view the requirements of this Guidance as representing the minimum standards necessary. The main purposes of this EPA guidance statement are: • to provide information and advice to assist participants in land use planning and development processes to protect, conserve and enhance the environment • to describe the processes the EPA may apply under the EP Act to land use planning and development in Western Australia, and in particular to describe the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process applied by the EPA to schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of an Ethnographic Aboriginal Heritage Survey of Hamersley Drive
    REPORT OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF THE HAMERSLEY DRIVE UPGRADE AND MATERIALS EXTRACTION PITS WITHIN THE FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND HOPETOUN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA. REPORT OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF THE HAMERSLEY DRIVE UPGRADE AND MATERIALS EXTRACTION PITS WITHIN THE FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND HOPETOUN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA A report prepared for GHD Pty Ltd upon behalf of Main Roads Western Australia. By Mr Brad Goode Consulting Anthropologist 79 Naturaliste Terrace DUNSBOROUGH WA 6281 [email protected] Report submitted February 2010 to: Mr Neil McCarthy GHD Pty Ltd, Principle Environmental Consultant 10 Victoria Street BUNBURY, WA 6872 Ms Melissa O’ Toole Environment Manger Main Roads Western Australia Great Southern Region ALBANY WA 6330 The Registrar Department of Indigenous Affairs PO Box 7770 Cloisters Square PERTH WA 6000 1 REPORT OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF THE HAMERSLEY DRIVE UPGRADE AND MATERIALS EXTRACTION PITS WITHIN THE FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND HOPETOUN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the following organisations and individuals who helped with the organisation and management of the heritage survey. GHD Pty Ltd – Neil McCarthy Main Roads Western Australia – Melissa O’Toole Albany DIA - Harley Coyne SWALSC – Sean O’Hara Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd - Brad Goode Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd - Angela Tarbotton Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd - Colin (Floyd) Irvine Brad Goode and Associates (SWALSC working party member) - Vernice Gillies. Applied Archaeology Australia -David Guilfoyle & staff - Wagyl Kaip (WC98/070) and Southern Noongar (WC96/109) Native Title Claim group representatives Ethnographic survey informants: Aden Eades Alwyn Coyne Sandra Woods (nee Inel) Bill Woods Lynette Knapp Graham Miniter Errol Williams Geoff Wynne John Penny Johno Woods Elaine Miniter DISCLAIMER All of the information contained in this report is believed to be correct and accurate at the time it was recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Practices Unknowingly Cause Poisoning of Lake Catchment 14 September 2015, by David Stacey
    Agricultural practices unknowingly cause poisoning of lake catchment 14 September 2015, by David Stacey natural conditions this acid groundwater rarely flows to rivers. "With clearing for agriculture, watertables have risen and acid water now discharges to rivers impacting on the biodiversity of these systems." Mr Lillicrap said his study also found that agricultural drains installed by farmers to lower water tables in a bid to manage salinity had inadvertently increased the acidification. The research found that more than 100 kilometres of waterways in the in the Dalyup catchment headwaters were already permanently acidified. "Lake Gore is a wetland of international significance under the Ramsar Convention and unless Agricultural clearing and drains installed by farmers management action is taken, the lower catchment to lower water tables and manage salinity are of the West Dalyup River will become increasingly inadvertently impacting waterways in one of the acidified and discharge high levels of aluminium, a largest and most botanically significant regions in toxic metal, into Lake Gore," Mr Lillicrap said. Australia, according to new research from The University of Western Australia. "It is important that landholders, natural resource management groups, government and the PhD student Adam Lillicrap investigated the community work together to manage this issue sources of acid groundwater around the Dalyup before it's too late." River and Lake Gore waterways system and the Jacup-Cameron Creek in the Fitzgerald River The work follows research by the UWA Centre of National Park in the Goldfields Esperance region of Excellence in Natural Resource Management into WA. the ecological impacts of deep drains across the Wheatbelt which found that the loss of stream and He found that rising acid groundwater tables were wetland invertebrates could impact other organisms flowing into waterways as a result of agricultural such as frogs and fish that feed on them.
    [Show full text]