South Coast Region Regional Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Coast Region Regional Management Plan SOUTH COAST REGION REGIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 1992 - 2002 MANAGEMENT PLAN NO. 24 Department of Conservation and Land Management for the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority and the Lands and Forest Commission Western Australia PREFACE Regional management plans are prepared by the Department of Conservation and Land Management on behalf of the Lands and Forest Commission and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority. These two bodies submit the plans for final approval and modification, if required, by the Minister for the Environment. Regional plans are to be prepared for each of the 10 regions administered by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). This plan for the South Coast Region covers all lands and waters in the Region vested under the CALM Act, together with wildlife responsibilities included in the Wildlife Conservation Act. In addition to the Regional Plan, more detailed management plans will be prepared for certain critical management issues, (the most serious of which is the spread of dieback disease in the Region); particular high value or high conflict areas, (such as some national parks); or for certain exploited or endangered species, (such as kangaroos and the Noisy Scrub-bird). These plans will provide more detailed information and guidance for management staff. The time frame for this Regional Plan is ten years, although review and restatement of some policies may be necessary during this period. Implementation will take place progressively over this period and there will be continuing opportunity for public comment. This management plan was submitted by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and adopted by the Lands and Forest Commission on 12 June 1991 and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority on 19 July 1991 and approved by the Minister for the Environment on 23 December 1991. i ACKNOWLEDGE MENTS The task of preparing the Draft Regional Plan was made easier by following closely the format structure of regional plans produced in 1987 for the three CALM forest regions. Input and advice on the draft and final plans was obtained from throughout the Department and the controlling bodies, in particular: · staff of the South Coast Region in Albany and Esperance; · Various branches within the Department of Conservation and Land Management; · the CALM Corporate Executive; · the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority and the Lands and Forest Commission Further advice was received from all ten Local Government Authorities within the Region: · Shire of Denmark · Town of Albany (in particular Town Planner, Nic Ayton) · Shire of Albany (in particular Shire Engineer, John Hull) · Shire of Plantagenet (in particular Councillor Jack Adams) · Shire of Cranbrook · Shire of Gnowangerup · Shire of Jeffamungup (in particular Councillor Ken Thomas and Councillor Pam Forbes) · Shire of Ravensthorpe (in particular Councillor Alan Carmichael) · Shire of Esperance (in particular members of Council Works Committee) · Shire of Dundas (in particular Councillor Peter Brown of Arubiddy Station). The final Regional Plan has benefited from the many comments received from those organisations and individuals who prepared submissions on the Draft Plan. Their time and attention to detail is greatly appreciated. Also appreciated is the patience and perseverance of the typists who worked so cheerfully on the preparation of the draft and final documents. Thanks to Christina Pollard, Caroline Budd, Marian Hickson, Ann Burchell and Debbie Bowra of CALM and to those who undertook parts of this work on a contract basis. ii NOMENCLATURE Inclusion of a name in this publication does not imply its approval by the relevant nomenclature authority. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this plan are: • To describe the land and wildlife resources managed by CALM in the South Coast Region. • To present a land use plan for land managed by CALM in the Region. • To outline policies and management guidelines on which day-to-day management of land, wildlife and resources in the Region is based. • To provide a framework for protection of native flora from plant disease. • To identify representative areas of land and seek their inclusion in the conservation estate. • To provide for public involvement in land-use planning and management by CALM. • To recognise that recreational opportunities on land managed by CALM should, where possible, be integrated with the opportunities existing on nearby land which is not managed by CALM. • To provide a planning and management framework for CALM responsibilities in the Region, upon which detailed operational plans can be based, and into which policy changes or research findings can be readily incorporated. The time frame for this Regional Plan is ten years, although review and restatement of some policies may be necessary during this period. iii CONTENTS PREFACE ___________________________________________________________________ i ACKNOWLEDGE MENTS _____________________________________________________ii NOMENCLATURE___________________________________________________________ iii OBJECTIVES _______________________________________________________________ iii CONTENTS_________________________________________________________________ iv PART A. INTRODUCTION___________________________________________________1 1.0 THE DEPARTMENT AND THE CONTROLLING BODIES______________________2 1.1 ORIGIN OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THE CONTROLLING BODIES ____________________2 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE DEPARTMENT (THE STRATEGIC PLAN)________________________2 1.3 LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING _________________________________________________4 2.0 VESTING, TENURE AND PURPOSE OF LAND MANAGED BY CALM___________6 2.1 CATEGORIES OF LAND CURRENTLY VESTED IN THE CONTROLLING BODIES AND MANAGED BY THE DEPARTMENT ________________________________________________________6 2.2 VESTING AND MANAGEMENT____________________________________________________6 2.3 TENURE AND SECURITY_________________________________________________________6 2.4 PURPOSE AND SECURITY OF PURPOSE___________________________________________7 2.5 LAND CATEGORIES MANAGED BY CALM ______________________________________________8 2.6 CRITERIA FOR ALLOCATION TO LAND CATEGORIES______________________________10 2.7 CALM RESPONSIBILITIES ON LANDS NOT VESTED IN THE CONTROLLING BODIES___11 3.0 LAND USE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT______________________________12 3.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES__________________________________________________________12 3.2 MULTIPLE USE PLANNING ______________________________________________________12 PART B. THE SOUTH COAST REGION_______________________________________16 4.0 THE REGION_________________________________________________________17 4.1 PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES________________________________________17 4.2 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES ___________________________________________27 4.3 LAND TENURE _________________________________________________________________30 4.4 SURROUNDING LANDS _________________________________________________________35 5.0 CALM ADMINISTRATION IN THE SOUTH COAST REGION_________________36 5.1 REGIONAL OBJECTIVES_________________________________________________________36 5.2 DISTRICTS WITHIN THE REGION_________________________________________________37 5.3 PERSONNEL ___________________________________________________________________38 5.4 MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY ZONES______________________________________________38 5.5 OUTSIDE ASSISTANCE__________________________________________________________41 PART C. LAND USE PROPOSALS____________________________________________42 6.0 PRESENT USE OF LAND MANAGED BY CALM IN THE REGION_____________43 7.0 PROPOSED CHANGES IN TENURE, VESTING AND PURPOSE _______________44 8.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES IN TENURE, VESTING AND PURPOSE _________________________________________________________________51 9.0 FUTURE RESERVE DEDICATION________________________________________52 iv PART D. MANAGEMENT ISSUES ___________________________________________53 10.0 LANDSCAPE AND LANDFORM _______________________________________55 10.1 LANDSCAPE ___________________________________________________________________55 10.2 COASTLINE____________________________________________________________________56 10.3 UPLAND AREAS________________________________________________________________57 10.4 CAVES ________________________________________________________________________58 10.5 WETLANDS ____________________________________________________________________59 11.0 CONSERVATION OF FLORA AND FAUNA______________________________61 11.1 FLORA AND FAUNA ____________________________________________________________61 11.2 VEGETATION AND RESERVE "CORRIDORS" ______________________________________67 11.3 MARINE AND ESTUARINE CONSERVATION_______________________________________70 12.0 CULTURAL AREAS__________________________________________________72 12.1 ABORIGINAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ___________________________________________72 12.2 HISTORIC SITES________________________________________________________________74 13.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT____________________________________76 13.1 PLANT DISEASES_______________________________________________________________76 13.2 FIRE___________________________________________________________________________78 13.3 WEEDS, FERAL ANIMALS AND PESTS____________________________________________80 13.4 REHABILITATION_______________________________________________________________82 14.0 RECREATION_______________________________________________________84 14.1
Recommended publications
  • South a Ustralia
    Madoonga RR SMITH Lake Way G Lake iver H H Lake Anneen RANGE Barwidgee MONTAGUE H 4WD H Beebyn HYouno RD Cullculli Yarrabubba RANGE Tjukayirla WELD RANGEGlen H T H H Downs H Wonganoo Karbar A RANGE Roadhouse E R Gidgee Lake Maitland BREAKAWA e Coodardy G H Yeelirrie H Mt Keith R H H H ERNEST Albion HLake Wells Telegootherra Hill HH BATES Nallan Downs SUE HANN r RANGE DE LA POER Rive H H RANGE Austin Downs CUE NEIL McNEILL Cogla Barrambie NECKERSGAT Yarraquin Downs H Lake Mason Yakabindie Yandal Lake Throssell H H H RANGE Lake H R Mt Pasco HILLS Austin Lake Mason H HKaluwiri Lake Darlot H H SHERRIFF RANGE STREETSMART® Lakeside Booylgoo Spring Banjawarn Bandya a H CONNIE H Dalgaranga Wanarie Black Leinster Downs R H Wondinong H ta Dalgaranga H Range Depot Springs LEINSTER Melrose Cosmo Newbery CENTRAL H Mount H H A H Hill Hill WynyangooH Windsor Weebo R Yeo Lake Shire of Laverton Farmer H H H SAUNDERS SANDSTONE W R RANGE Boogardie Y T Cosmo Newbery H Hy Brazil Mt Boreas A H E Aboriginal Community MT MAGNET H H R NEALE ngal A Dandaraga Black Hill Shire of Leonora G J Atley H UN H 4WD onlyC RD Yoweragabbie Pinnacles T Edah H H Lake Irwin IO da HH Munbinia Iowna Erlistoun N H Challa H Mt Zephyr H Murrum Wogarno H Windimurra R SERPENTINE H Nambi H Laverton BAILEY RD LAKES Ilkurlka Wagga Wagga R Bulga Downs Downs H Roadhouse MeelineH Youanmi H R H RANGE " ANNE BEADELL HWY " Wogarno Downs White Hill Yuinmery Mt Windarra Cliffs H H H H Sturt A GREAT VICTORIA 4WD only DESERT Muralgarra Kirkalocka OCTOR HICKS Nalbarra Lake Ida Valley Meadows Mertondale
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 - 2019 Achievement Report
    FITZGERALD BIOSPHERE GROUP 2014 - 2019 Achievement Report Page 2 FITZGERALD BIOSHERE GROUP ACHIEVEMENT REPORT 2014-2019 Thank you to all of our project partners and supporters Page 3 FITZGERALD BIOSHERE GROUP ACHIEVEMENT REPORT 2014-2019 Fitzgerald Biosphere Group 8-10 Tobruk Road Jerramungup WA 6337 or Po Box 49 Jerramungup WA 6337 Ph: (08) 9835 1127 General Enquiries: [email protected] Page 4 FITZGERALD BIOSHERE GROUP ACHIEVEMENT REPORT 2014-2019 Table of Contents Page 5 Foreward– FBG Chairman, Damon Parker 6 Execitive Officer’s Report– Leonie McMahon 7-8 About the FBG (Board, Advisory Committee & Staff) 9-10 The Fitzgerald Biosphere, the FBG and the FBCC 11-15 FBG Annual Events 2014-2019 12 Spring Field Day 13 Farmer Updates 14 Fitzy Fox Shoot 15 Cat Sterilisation Clinic 16-24 FBG Significant Events 2014-2019 16 Dancing in the Dirt 17 Climate Change Workshop 17 Managing soil health in dry seasonal conditions 18 Dry Season Workshop 19 Low Stress Stock Handling 20 Air Seeder Comparison Trial 20 Pasture to Pocket 21 SEPWA DIY Precision Ag 22 Ladies Day 2015 23 FBG Meat, Malt and Marketing Tour 24 Project Dieback trip to West Mount Barren 24 Community Conservation Bremer Bay Primary School 25-26 FBG Project Summary 27-28 Current Projects 29-41 Sustainable Agriculture—Projects 29-31 One Paddock Challenge 32 Feasibility Study on branding of grass fed red meat for export market recognition 33 Trialing dryland natural rubber production in the WA Wheatbelt 34 Frost management options to increase wheat grain quality & yield 35-36 Sub Soil Constraints
    [Show full text]
  • Tabled Paper – Legislative Council Question on Notice 3064
    TABLED PAPER – LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL QUESTION ON NOTICE 3064 A SUMMARY OF COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS IN SOUTH WEST NATIONAL PARKS 2012-13 Park Improvements Cost Yalgorup National Park Martins Tank campground upgrade $673,425 Lane Poole Reserve Nanga Brook campground upgrade $106,441 Lane Poole Reserve River Road bridge replacement $75,000 Leeuwin-Naturaliste National Park Sugarloaf Rock redevelopment $300,984 Leeuwin-Naturaliste National Park Lefthanders access road sealing $200,000 Bramley National Park Wharncliffe Mill upgrade $38,761 Wiltshire Butler National Park Crouch Road bridge replacement $19,054 D’Entrecasteaux National Park Donnelly River Boat Landing site upgrade $23,974 Mt Frankland National Park Mt Frankland Wilderness lookout $200,000 Walpole-Nornalup National Park Coalmine Beach finger jetty $156,934 Walpole-Nornalup National Park Coalmine Beach small boat facilities $316,654 Walpole-Nornalup National Park Rocky Crossing intersection upgrade $30,000 D’Entrecasteaux National Park Bottleneck Bay and Cliffy Head car park upgrade $20,000 Mt Frankland North National Park Shedick Road bridge replacement $75,000 Porongurup National Park Castle Rock day use area upgrade $525 Porongurup National Park Porongurup scenic drive upgrade $25,000 Torndirrup National Park Gap-Natural Bridge upgrade $271,302 Fitzgerald River National Park Point Ann upgrade $159,417 TOTAL $2,692,471 2013-14 Park Improvements Cost Yalgorup National Park Martins Tank campground upgrade $43,286 Yalgorup National Park Martins Tank campground upgrade $522,788
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzgerald Coast Ravensthorpe * Hopetoun * Munglinup Fitzgerald River National Park 2016
    FITZGERALD COAST RAVENSTHORPE * HOPETOUN * MUNGLINUP FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK 2016 1 Welcome FITZGERALD COAST RAVENSTHORPE * HOPETOUN * MUNGLINUP FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK 2016 Welcome Hamersley sand dunes – Fitzgerald River National Park ! Photo - Josh Brunner Welcome to the 2016 issue of the Fitzgerald Coast Tourism Associations’ Visitor’s Guide. This publication has been designed to ensure that visitors to our wonderful region have all the information they need. It is packed full of what to see, what to do, where to go and how to make the absolute most of your amazing Fitzgerald Coast adventure holiday. www.fitzgeraldcoast.com.au Contents Welcome 2 Our region 3 5-day self drive tour 4 - 6 Range 4WD tour guide 7 - 8 Ravensthorpe Range 9 Farm Gate Art Trail 10 - 11 Ravensthorpe History 12 Ravensthorpe 13 FRNP map 14 – 15 Walk trails 16 Wildflowers and plants 17 Hopetoun 18 – 19 Fitzgerald River National Park (FRNP) 20 – 21 Munglinup 22 Camping 23 Sunset over Ravensthorpe Ethel Daw Scenic Drive 24 Photo – John Carlisle Business listing 25 Acknowledgements: Accommodation, meals Produced by: Fitzgerald Coast Tourism Association (FCTA). and business services 26 – 28 Printed by: Abbott & Co, Kewdale WA – Ph: 08 9353 1166 Designed by: Kay Pearson – Ph: 0400 499 267 Advertising sales: [email protected] Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to Photography: Josh Brunner, John Carlisle, Rose Pearson, ensure the information contained within this booklet is correct at the time of publishing. FCTA TourismWA, Dene Bingham, Alan Carmichael. holds no responsibility for incorrect content or information within this publication. 2 Published September 2015 2 Our region — Fitzgerald Coast — Fitzgerald Our region Our region – Fitzgerald Coast Quoin Head – Fitzgerald River National Park – courtesy TourismWA Come and enjoy a temperate Mediterranean The coastal town of Hopetoun has for many climate with beautiful sunny winter days and years served as a retirement village and cool summer nights.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Total Fire Ban Declarations Per Fire Season
    NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Christmas Island 2 1 0 0 1 0 City of Albany 2 1 2 3 10 1 City of Armadale 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Bayswater 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Belmont 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Bunbury 7 1 0 2 5 7 City of Busselton 6 1 0 2 5 7 City of Canning 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Cockburn 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Fremantle 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Gosnells 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Greater Geraldton 4 6 3 14 19 20 City of Joondalup 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Kalamunda 11 4 0 5 18 18 City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder 2 8 10 14 20 9 City of Karratha 1 1 2 7 10 2 City of Kwinana 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Mandurah 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Melville 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Nedlands 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Rockingham 11 1 0 1 7 6 City of South Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Stirling 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Subiaco 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Swan 11 4 0 5 18 22 City of Vincent 9 1 0 1 7 6 City of Wanneroo 10 1 0 1 8 10 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 2 1 0 0 1 0 Indian Ocean Territories 2 1 0 0 1 0 Shire of Ashburton 1 2 4 11 11 3 Shire of Augusta Margaret River 7 1 0 0 6 3 Shire of Beverley 3 2 1 2 15 14 Shire of Boddington 6 3 1 0 7 11 Shire of Boyup Brook 6 3 0 1 6 7 Shire of Bridgetown- 6 3 0 1 6 7 Greenbushes Shire of Brookton 4 3 1 0 8 15 Shire of Broome 1 0 2 0 9 0 DFES – TOTAL FIRE BANS DECLARED PER YEAR PER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA Page 1 of 4 NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup
    [Show full text]
  • Great South West Edge Touring Route Drive One of Australia’S Most Fascinating Landscapes Between Perth and Esperance, Known As the Great South West Edge
    Drive GREAT SOUTH WEST the EDGE EXPERIENCE WESTERN AUSTRALIA’S EXTRAORDINARY LANDSCAPE, IN ONE GREAT ROAD TRIP ALONG THE EDGE. PERTH THE WONDERS OF WA IN ONE GREAT ROAD TRIP 11 day Great South West Edge Touring Route Drive one of Australia’s most fascinating landscapes between Perth and Esperance, known as the Great South West Edge. This unique region comprises many contrasting landscapes; from ancient mountain ranges and rugged granite headlands along the south coast, to the towering karri trees in the Southern Forests and a network of spectacular caves further to the west. The regions’ best attractions are dotted in and around pretty country towns and vast national parks harbouring some of the world’s most unique flora and fauna. This 11 day attraction itinerary gives visitors the option of covering the full route in an action packed 11 days. Optional detour Kalgoorlie routes are included which can extend your trip to accommodate individual travel Coolgardie times. If time is restricted, visitors can select sections of the itinerary to complete or plan Southern Cross to incorporate air travel, with airports in GREAT EASTERN HWY Kambalda Albany and Esperance to reduce travel time. Merredin This 11 day itinerary can easily be extended Northam to cover a longer period as there is so GREAT EASTERN HWY much to see and do along the route. York Perth Fremantle Armadale Y W H Corrigin Norseman HW Y Y W Brookton INDIAN OCEAN H Hyden H Mandurah T North Dandalup U O S Pinjarra H Kulin W Y Yalgorup Waroona National Park Narrogin Williams Harvey
    [Show full text]
  • Dundas Woodlands Discovery Trail E
    Kalgoorlie-BoulderKalgoorlie-Boulder City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder KambaldaKambalda Coolgardie-Esperance Hwy Lake Cowan CoolgardieCoolgardie Eyre Highway Shire of Coolgardie NorsemanNorseman Great Eastern Hwy SiteSite 11:11: WoodlandsWoodlands WalkWalk SiteSiteSite 10:10:10: LakeLakeLake CowanCowanCowan --- NorsemanNorsemanNorseman LookoutLookoutLookout SiteSiteSite 11:11:11: WoodlandsWoodlandsWoodlands WalkWalkWalk 1.5 4.0 4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Site 9: The Gem Fields Picnic Area 4.04.04.04.04.04.0 5.0 4.1 15.4 13.5 Site 8: The Woodland Picnic Area Lake Dundas Victoria Rock Rd Rock Victoria 20.6 Shire of Dundas 18.6 Coolgardie-Esperance Hwy 20.4 Site 7: Disappointment Rock Picnic Area 2.7 Site 6: Lake Johnston Camping Area Site 4: McDermid Rock Picnic Area 2.4 Site 5: Lake Johnston Picnic Area 18.5 Lake Johnston Holland Track Holland 13.1 Site 3: The Emily Anne Lay-By 0.4 SouthernSouthernGreat EasternCrossCross Hwy Navoria Track 19.0 Shire of Esperance Lake Hope Site 2: The Breakaways Camping Area 11.9 DundasDundas WoodlandsWoodlands DiscoveryDiscovery TrailTrail 12.8 SiteSiteSite 1:1:1: ShireShireShire BoundaryBoundaryBoundary ShireShireShire ofofof DundasDundasDundas ShireShireShireShireShireShire of of of ofofof Dundas Dundas Dundas DundasDundasDundas ShireShireShire ofofof KondininKondininKondinin ShireShireShireShireShireShire of of of ofofof Kondinin Kondinin Kondinin KondininKondininKondinin 25.4 Shire of Yilgarn Forrestania Rd Norseman-Lake King Rd 28.0 Holland Track Holland Shire of Ravensthorpe State Barrier Fence 5.0 39.0 Wave Rock Shire of Kulin 11.0 Shire of Kondinin e HydenHyden Prepared by: March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Report
    APPENDICES 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Election Report Appendix 1 – Referendum, Poll and Plebiscite Results Results of referendums, polls and plebiscites are not binding, but do provide an indication of public opinion for the Council to consider when making decisions on issues. Town of Vincent A plebiscite was conducted for the Town of Vincent to decide the method of election of the mayor. Which method of filling the office of mayor do you prefer? Votes Elected by the Electors 5,632 Elected by the Council from amongst the Councillors 582 Total Valid Votes 6,214 Informal 24 Total Votes Received 6,238 The majority of electors voted to elect the office of mayor by the electors. 39 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Election Report Appendix 2 – Reasons for Rejection of Voter Packages Declaration not Declaration District Other Total signed Missing City of Albany 168 17 3 188 City of Armadale 150 33 0 183 Shire of Ashburton 15 9 0 24 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River 39 8 0 47 Town of Bassendean 82 25 3 110 City of Belmont 147 33 4 184 Shire of Bridgetown-Greenbushes 10 4 1 15 City of Bunbury 52 58 2 112 Shire of Busselton 89 27 2 118 Town of Cambridge 114 34 7 155 City of Canning 259 61 2 322 Shire of Capel 34 19 0 53 Shire of Carnarvon 26 7 4 37 Shire of Chittering 7 3 0 10 Town of Claremont 18 2 2 22 City of Cockburn 395 125 4 524 Shire of Collie 62 8 4 74 Town of Cottesloe 36 19 1 56 Shire of Cuballing 6 1 1 8 Shire of Dardanup 0 0 0 0 Shire of Denmark 36 9 1 46 Shire of Donnybrook-Balingup 32 0 0 32 Shire of East Pilbara 16
    [Show full text]
  • Shire of Jerramungup Local Planning Strategy
    Prepared by Gray & Lewis Landuse Planners for Shire of Jerramungup SHIRE OF JERRAMUNGUP LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY 2010 Limited Review Modified June 2011 Modified December 2011 Finalised December 2012 Modified 25 January 2018 Acknowledgement A Local Planning Strategy for the Shire of Jerramungup was endorsed by the Western Australian Planning Commission on 13 June 2006. Preparation of the 2006 Local Planning Strategy was finalised by Gray & Lewis Landuse Planners however it was largely based a draft Local Planning Strategy prepared for the Shire by SJB Planners (with mapping provided by Harley Global). The Strategy was prepared to support Draft Local Planning Scheme 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Strategy Review ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Role and Purpose ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Relevant Considerations .................................................................................................... 3 2.0 STATE AND REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT ....................................................................... 3 2.1 State Planning Framework ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shire of Esperance Esperance Tanker Jetty Replacement Concept Design Report
    Shire of Esperance Esperance Tanker Jetty Replacement Concept Design Report July 2017 This report has been prepared by GHD for the Shire of Esperance and may only be used and relied on by Shire of Esperance for the purpose agreed between GHD and the Shire of Esperance as set out in this report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than Shire of Esperance arising in connection with this report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this report were limited to those specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this report on the basis of information provided by the Shire of Esperance and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Southern Recovery Plan
    Great Southern Recovery Plan The Great Southern Recovery Plan is part of the next step in our COVID-19 journey. It’s part of WA’s $5.5 billion overarching State plan, focused on building infrastructure, economic, health and social outcomes. The Great Southern Recovery Plan will deliver a pipeline of jobs in sectors including construction, manufacturing, tourism and hospitality, renewable energy, education and training, agriculture, conservation and mining. WA’s recovery is a joint effort, it’s about Government working with industry together. We managed the pandemic together as a community. Together, we will recover. Investing in our Schools and Rebuilding our TAFE Sector • $6.3 million for a new Performing Arts centre at Albany Senior High School • $1.1 million for refurbishments at North Albany Senior High School including the visual arts area and specialist subject classrooms • $17 million to South Regional TAFE’s Albany campus for new trade workshops, delivering training in the automotive, engineering and construction industries • $25 million for free TAFE short courses to upskill thousands of West Australians, with a variety of free courses available at South Regional TAFE’s Albany, Denmark, Katanning and Mount Barker campuses • $32 million to expand the Lower Fees, Local Skills program and significantly reduce TAFE fees across 39 high priority courses • $4.8 million for the Apprenticeship and Traineeship Re-engagement Incentive that provides employers with a one-off payment of $6,000 for hiring an apprentice and $3,000 for hiring
    [Show full text]
  • Report of an Ethnographic Aboriginal Heritage Survey of Hamersley Drive
    REPORT OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF THE HAMERSLEY DRIVE UPGRADE AND MATERIALS EXTRACTION PITS WITHIN THE FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND HOPETOUN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA. REPORT OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF THE HAMERSLEY DRIVE UPGRADE AND MATERIALS EXTRACTION PITS WITHIN THE FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND HOPETOUN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA A report prepared for GHD Pty Ltd upon behalf of Main Roads Western Australia. By Mr Brad Goode Consulting Anthropologist 79 Naturaliste Terrace DUNSBOROUGH WA 6281 [email protected] Report submitted February 2010 to: Mr Neil McCarthy GHD Pty Ltd, Principle Environmental Consultant 10 Victoria Street BUNBURY, WA 6872 Ms Melissa O’ Toole Environment Manger Main Roads Western Australia Great Southern Region ALBANY WA 6330 The Registrar Department of Indigenous Affairs PO Box 7770 Cloisters Square PERTH WA 6000 1 REPORT OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF THE HAMERSLEY DRIVE UPGRADE AND MATERIALS EXTRACTION PITS WITHIN THE FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND HOPETOUN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the following organisations and individuals who helped with the organisation and management of the heritage survey. GHD Pty Ltd – Neil McCarthy Main Roads Western Australia – Melissa O’Toole Albany DIA - Harley Coyne SWALSC – Sean O’Hara Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd - Brad Goode Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd - Angela Tarbotton Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd - Colin (Floyd) Irvine Brad Goode and Associates (SWALSC working party member) - Vernice Gillies. Applied Archaeology Australia -David Guilfoyle & staff - Wagyl Kaip (WC98/070) and Southern Noongar (WC96/109) Native Title Claim group representatives Ethnographic survey informants: Aden Eades Alwyn Coyne Sandra Woods (nee Inel) Bill Woods Lynette Knapp Graham Miniter Errol Williams Geoff Wynne John Penny Johno Woods Elaine Miniter DISCLAIMER All of the information contained in this report is believed to be correct and accurate at the time it was recorded.
    [Show full text]