DOCSLIB.ORG

Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32 SALINITY INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK INTERIM REPORT – PHASE I SLUI 32 2003 Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32 SALINITY INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK INTERIM REPORT — PHASE I prepared by Resource Science Division Department of Environment DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SALINITY AND LAND USE IMPACTS REPORT No SLUI 32 OCTOBER 2003 i Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32 Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Acknowledgments This report was prepared by Damien McAlinden, Tim Sparks, Don Burnside and Louise Stelfox. This report is also based on a compilation of work completed by a group of dedicated people listed in Sections 1.1.1 and 1.1.2. The Salinity Investment Framework Steering Committee acknowledges with gratitude the assistance provided by the following people and organisations: • The Natural Resource Management Council for its support and encouragement of the process • Members and staff of the Avon Catchment Council for their support for the process and their assistance in organising the regional workshops • Staff from the Departments of Agriculture, Conservation and Land Management, and Environment for their assistance with data assemblage, analyses and presentation • Staff from the University of Western Australia for their assistance with establishing the methodology to be used in the Salinity Investment Framework For more information contact: Louise Stelfox Resource Science Division 3 Plain Street EAST PERTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6004 Telephone (08) 9278 0300 Facsimile (08) 9278 0586 Recommended reference The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Environment 2003, Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report – Phase I, 2003, Department of Environment, Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series No. SLUI 32. We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at www.environment.wa.gov.au/public/feedback/ ISBN 1-920849-53-X ISSN 1447-7394 October 2003 Cover Photograph: Pink Lakes, Quairading Photograph courtesy of Viv Read ii Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32 Foreword Managing salinity is a huge job that will continue for decades. However, our resources in terms of money, people, and time are limited. These resources to counter salinity are contributed by individuals, community groups, governments and private organisations. If we are to do the best for current and future generations, we need to invest these resources wisely to save our most important natural assets. Like anyone on a limited budget, we need to make sure we are spending our time and money effectively, and on the most essential items. We need a consistent, practical way of setting priorities to determine which of our prized natural assets are most at risk and could feasibly be restored, or saved from the effects of salinity. This is where the Salinity Investment Framework comes in. This framework is a new way of determining natural resource management (NRM) spending priorities to help manage salinity. For some time, allocation of public funds into salinity management has been problematic. There is so much to do and resources are limited. Communities have been looking for guidance about how to proceed. Individual landholders want to know how their efforts contribute to local or regional outcomes. In 2002, the Minister for the Environment, Dr Judy Edwards, accepted a recommendation from the (then) State Salinity Council to commission a project to develop a process for determining how priorities can be set for investment of resources in salinity management — termed the Salinity Investment Framework. The general aim is to ensure that public investment is directed to projects with the best potential to protect assets of high public value that are at threat from salinity. The project has received government funding and has been managed by the Salinity Investment Framework Steering Committee, which comprises senior government and community people with specialist salinity knowledge. This report describes the work done to date in turning a concept into a sound process that will help focus our investment in salinity management. However, it is still a work in progress. For these reasons, it is termed an ‘Interim Report’. Further work will include determining the feasibility of protecting assets of high public value, the priority to be placed on developing technologies for salinity management, and how the process can operate at regional and local scales. On behalf of the Salinity Investment Framework Steering Committee, I thank the many people in government agencies, community groups, universities and private organisations who have contributed to the work reported here. In particular, I thank the Avon communities and the Avon Catchment Council for their willingness to be involved in the process and for their contributions to the work. I encourage people to get involved in the continuing work in investment planning at state, regional and local scales. This is important work for us all. I commend the report to you. Rachel Siewert Chairperson, Salinity Investment Framework Steering Committee Member, Natural Resource Management Council October 2003 iii Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32 Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Contents Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................... ii Reference details ...................................................................................................... ii Foreword .................................................................................................................... iii Executive summary ................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 1.1 A clear position on salinity and its management .................................. 5 1.2 Developing an investing framework ........................................................ 5 1.3 The Salinity Investment Framework (SIF) Project ............................... 6 1.4 Project objectives and outcomes ............................................................. 7 1.5 Project management ................................................................................... 8 1.5.1 The Steering Committee .............................................................................8 1.5.2 The Project Teams ......................................................................................8 1.6 This Report ..................................................................................................... 9 2 Setting priorities for investment in salinity management — the approach ...................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Managing assets impacted by salinity — definitions, principles and processes ............................................................................................. 10 2.1.1 Defining assets, threats and feasibility ...................................................... 11 2.1.2 Principles................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 The process of setting priorities – six steps .............................................. 11 2.1.4 Relating goals, asset importance and priorities for action at state, regional and local scales ...........................................................................12 2.2 Developing a methodology ...................................................................... 13 2.2.1 A simple conceptual model .......................................................................13 2.2.2 Determining asset value, threat and feasibility..........................................14 2.2.3 Value–threat matrix ...................................................................................15 iv Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Salinity Investment Framework Interim Report — Phase 1 SLUI 32 2.3 Implementation — asset clauses and information sources ............ 16 2.3.1 Deciding assets classes ............................................................................16 2.3.2 Information for assessing asset values and threats ..................................17 2.3.3 Obtaining regional views ...........................................................................17 2.3.4 The workshops ..........................................................................................18 2.4 Further actions required ........................................................................... 19 2.4.1 Multiple values and spatial analysis — the ‘pizza approach’ ....................19 2.4.2 Feasibility information ...............................................................................19 2.4.3 Completing the work of state, regional and local scales ...........................20 2.4.4 Making an investment decision .................................................................20 2.4.5 Public investment into private assets ........................................................21 2.4.6 Managing public resource allocation at state scale...................................21 2.5 Summary ...................................................................................................... 22 3 Biodiversity assets — South West Agricultural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Coast Region Regional Management Plan
    SOUTH COAST REGION REGIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 1992 - 2002 MANAGEMENT PLAN NO. 24 Department of Conservation and Land Management for the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority and the Lands and Forest Commission Western Australia PREFACE Regional management plans are prepared by the Department of Conservation and Land Management on behalf of the Lands and Forest Commission and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority. These two bodies submit the plans for final approval and modification, if required, by the Minister for the Environment. Regional plans are to be prepared for each of the 10 regions administered by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). This plan for the South Coast Region covers all lands and waters in the Region vested under the CALM Act, together with wildlife responsibilities included in the Wildlife Conservation Act. In addition to the Regional Plan, more detailed management plans will be prepared for certain critical management issues, (the most serious of which is the spread of dieback disease in the Region); particular high value or high conflict areas, (such as some national parks); or for certain exploited or endangered species, (such as kangaroos and the Noisy Scrub-bird). These plans will provide more detailed information and guidance for management staff. The time frame for this Regional Plan is ten years, although review and restatement of some policies may be necessary during this period. Implementation will take place progressively over this period and there will be continuing opportunity for public comment. This management plan was submitted by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and adopted by the Lands and Forest Commission on 12 June 1991 and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority on 19 July 1991 and approved by the Minister for the Environment on 23 December 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • DMP Annual Report 1955
    COVER PICTURE The cover picture shows the Sons of Gwalia Gold Mine at Leonora. In the foreground of the picture are the staff houses and swimming pool. In the centre can be seen the plant, mine buildings and the head~frame, with" the open cut in the background. This is the oldest mine in Western Australia having been worked continuously since 1897. It has produced 6,063,460' 53 tons of ore for 2,362,405 fine ozs. of gold. WESTERN AUSTRALIA - 1957 1-;::============================ OF THE e artm nt of In s FOR THE YEAR 1955 I I PERTH: By Authority: WllLlAM H. WYATT, Government Printer 1957 3974'3'57-625 To the Hon. Minister for Mines. Sir, I have the honour to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Mines of the State of Western Australia for the year 1955, together with reports from the officers controlling Sub-Departments, and Comparative Tables furnishing statistics relative to the Mining Industry. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, A. H. TELFER, Under Secretary for Mines. Perth, April, 1956. TABLE Of CONTENTS DIVISION I. Page Part I.-General Remarks 7 Output of Gold during 1955 7 Mining generally 7 Minerals .... 8 Coal 8 00 8 Part Il.-Minerals Raised.... 9 Quantity and Value of Minerals produced during 1954-55 .... .... 9 Value and Percentage of Mineral Exports compared with Total Exports 10 Amount of Gold from every Goldfield reported to Mines Department 11 Gold Ore raised and average per man employed .... .... .... 11 Output of Gold from other States of Australia, Mandated Territory of New Guinea, and New Zealand 12 Dividends paid by Mining Companies during 1955 12 Minerals, other than Gold, reported to ~1ines Department 14 Coal raised, Value, number of Men employed, and Output per man 15 Part IlL-Leases and other Holdings under the Various Acts relating to Mining- Number and Acreage of Leases held for ~ning 15 Part IV.-Men Employed- Average Number of Men engaged in ~1ining during 1954-55 16 Part V.-Accidents- Men killed and injured during 1954-55 17 Part VL-State Aid to Mining- State Batteries ...
    [Show full text]
  • Nuytsia the Journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 22(6): 409–454 Published Online 18 December 2012
    D. Nicolle & M.E. French, A revision of Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae from south-western Australia 409 Nuytsia The journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 22(6): 409–454 Published online 18 December 2012 A revision of Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae (Myrtaceae) from south-western Australia, including the description of new taxa and comments on the probable hybrid origin of E. balanites, E. balanopelex and E. phylacis Dean Nicolle1,3 and Malcolm E. French2 1Currency Creek Arboretum, PO Box 808, Melrose Park, South Australia 5039 229 Stonesfield Court, Padbury, Western Australia 6025 3Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract Nicolle, D. & French, M.E. A revision of Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae (Myrtaceae) from south-western Australia, including the description of new taxa and comments on the probable hybrid origin of E. balanites, E. balanopelex and E. phylacis. Nuytsia 22(6): 409–454 (2012). Twenty terminal taxa (including 18 species) are recognised in Eucalyptus ser. Falcatae. Brooker & Hopper. We include the monotypic E. ser. Cooperianae L.A.S.Johnson ex Brooker (E. cooperiana F.Muell.) in the series. The new species E. annettae D.Nicolle & M.E.French and E. opimiflora D.Nicolle & M.E.French and the new subspecies E. goniantha Turcz. subsp. kynoura D.Nicolle & M.E.French are described. New combinations made are E. adesmophloia (Brooker & Hopper) D.Nicolle & M.E.French, E. ecostata (Maiden) D.Nicolle & M.E.French and E. notactites (L.A.S.Johnson & K.D.Hill) D.Nicolle & M.E.French. The circumscription of some taxa is significantly modified from previous accounts, including that of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchments of the Esperance Region of Western Australia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia (DAFWA): Research Library Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1997 Catchments of the Esperance region of Western Australia S T. Gee John Andrew Simons Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Gee, S T, and Simons, J A. (1997), Catchments of the Esperance region of Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Report 165. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ISSN 0729-3135 January 1997 Catchments of the Esperance Region of Western Australia Prepared by: S.T. Gee and J.A. Simons Department of Agriculture Esperance, Western Australia Resource Management Technical Report No. 165 CATCHMENTS OF THE ESPERANCE REGION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Disclaimer The contents of this report were based on the best available information at the time of publication. It is based in part on various assumptions and predictions. Conditions may change over time and conclusions should be interpreted in the light of the latest information available.
    [Show full text]
  • Ravensthorpe Area Catchment Appraisal 2006
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1-1-2006 Ravensthorpe area catchment appraisal 2006 A Massenbauer Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, Hydrology Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Massenbauer, A. (2006), Ravensthorpe area catchment appraisal 2006. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth. Report 311. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 1039-7205 Resource Management Technical Report 311 Ravensthorpe Area CATCHMENT APPRAISAL 2006 Compiled by Angela Massenbauer for the Esperance–Ravensthorpe Catchment Support Team September 2006 DISCLAIMER: The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture & Food and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. © State of Western Australia, 2006 RAVENSTHORPE AREA APPRAISAL Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchid Name Index (16/2/2007)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (16/2/2007) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P-H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Esperance Coastal Reserves Issues Paper
    MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ESPERANCE COASTAL RESERVES ISSUES PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Environment and Conservation, in accordance with the Conservation and Land Management Act 1984, carries out the management of all national parks, conservation parks and nature reserves in Western Australia, and prepares management plans on behalf of the Conservation Commission of Western Australia. A draft management plan is currently being prepared for the Esperance Coastal Reserves. As part of this process, the following issues paper has been formulated following consultation with the Esperance Parks and Reserves Advisory Committee, field visits with local staff, and community workshops in Esperance, Condingup and Munglinup. The purpose of the issues paper is to highlight the values and main management issues of the Esperance Coastal Reserves to form the basis for the draft management plan, and to inform and assist people in participating in the initial stages of the management planning process. Management Planning Area The management planning area referred to as the ‘Esperance Coastal Reserves’ includes the national parks and nature reserves in the Esperance area, including the offshore islands and rocks of the Recherche Archipelago1 as well as a number of proposed additions (Map 1). These national parks and nature reserves form a network of conservation areas that protect a wide variety of native plant and animal communities and landscapes. On a wider scale, the Esperance Coastal Reserves form a significant part of the South Coast Macro Corridor project, which seeks to provide major vegetated corridor links in the south coast region. The Recherche Archipelago is also an important part of the State’s conservation reserve system as it provides safe refugia for many species no longer widespread on the adjoining mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Agency Statement of Natural Resource Management Priorities in Western Australia
    Preliminary Agency Statement of Natural Resource Management Priorities in Western Australia Department of Agriculture Department of Conservation and Land Management Department of Environment Department of Fisheries November 2003 “Results contained within this report do not represent a final priority listing of assets for investment, but provide a starting point or guide for further discussion and investigations that will contribute to a final investment decision.” Acknowledgments Contribution Personnel Title Organisation Team Leader Verity Klemm Restoration and Management Department of Environment Section Manager Report Preparation Eve Bunbury Manager, Marine Planning Department of Fisheries Report Preparation Keith Claymore Senior Policy Advisor Department of Conservation and Land Management Report Preparation Verity Klemm Restoration and Management Department of Environment Section Manager Report Preparation Damien McAlinden Natural Resource Management Department of Environment Officer Report Preparation Brendan Nicholas Research Officer, Esperance Department of Agriculture Office Report Preparation Noel Schoknecht Unit Manager for Natural Department of Agriculture Resources Report Preparation Rob Tregonning Senior Policy Officer, Department of Fisheries Environmental Assessment Report Preparation Ian Watson Advisor, Land Management Department of Agriculture Report Preparation Gordon Wyre Acting Director, Nature Department of Conservation and Conservation Land Management For more information contact: Verity Klemm Catchment Management
    [Show full text]
  • A Monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)
    Phytotaxa 300 (1): 001–308 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press Monograph ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.300.1.1 PHYTOTAXA 300 A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae) MICHAEL D. CRISP1, LINDY CAYZER1,2, GREGORY T. CHANDLER1,3 & LYN G. COOK4 1Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia. Email: [email protected] 2Present address: Australian National Herbarium, Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia. Email: [email protected] 3Present address: Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, 1 Pederson Road, Eaton, Northern Territory 0812, Australia. Email: [email protected] 4School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by James Boatwright: 31 Jan. 2017; published: 24 Mar. 2017 1 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 MICHAEL D. CRISP, LINDY CAYZER, GREGORY T. CHANDLER & LYN G. COOK A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae) (Phytotaxa 300) 308 pp.; 30 cm. 24 March 2017 ISBN 978-1-77670-108-7 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-109-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2017 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ © 2017 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. ISSN 1179-3155 (Print edition) ISSN 1179-3163 (Online edition) 2 • Phytotaxa 300 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press CRISP ET AL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Cryptoblepharus (Lacertilia, Scincidae)
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus., 1976, 4 (1) THE GENUS qRYPTOBLEPHAR US (LACERTILIA, SCINCIDAE) IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA G.M. STORR* [Received 6 March 1975. Accepted 7 May 1975.' Published 31 August 1976.] ABSTRACT Fbur taxa are recognized: C. virgatus clarus (Storr), C. carnabyi nov., C. plagiocephalus (Cocteau) and C. megastictus novo INTRODUCTION It has become clear in recent years that the Ablepharus boutonii of authors, especially Mertens (1931, 1964), far from being a smgle wide-ranging polytypic species, comprises a genus of ,many species. The oldest name for this genus is Cryptoblepharus. For the osteology of Cryptoblepharus, see Fuhn (1969); and for its relationship to other lygosomatine skinks, see Greer (1974). A big task for future worker~ is to arrange the numerous 'races of Ablepharus boutonii' into species. It is unlikely that any of the four Western Australian members of Cryptoblepharusare conspecific with boutonii of Mauritius; the two species Il).ost like boutonii (plagiocephalus and carnabyi) are still closer to each other. All the material used in thjs revision is lodged in the Western Australian Museum. I am grateful to Mrs Ariadna Neumann for translating much of Professor Mertens' work. Genus Cryptoblepharus Wiegmann Diagnosis (based on Australian species). Small arboreal or rock-climbing pentadactyl skinks with lower eyelid immovable and bearing a large circular transparent disc, and interparietal and frontoparietals fused into a large quadrilateral shield. Distinguishable from Morethia by frontal not much larger than prefrontals, enlargement of upper­ most periocular granules, and absence of supranasal. *Curator of Birds and Reptiles, Western Australian Museum. 53 Distribution From east coast of Africa through the Indian Ocean and Australia to the east Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Poison Plants of Western Australia
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 12 Number 1 1971 Article 5 1-1-1971 Poison plants of Western Australia : the toxic species of the genera Gastrolobium and Oxylobium : thick-leaf poison (Gastrolobium crassifolium Benth.), narrow-leaf poison (Gastrolobium stenophyllum Turcz.), mallet poison (Gastrolobium densifolium C.A. Gardn.), wall-flower poison (Gastrolobium grandifolorum F. Muell) T E H Aplin Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Veterinary Toxicology and Pharmacology Commons Recommended Citation Aplin, T E H (1971) "Poison plants of Western Australia : the toxic species of the genera Gastrolobium and Oxylobium : thick-leaf poison (Gastrolobium crassifolium Benth.), narrow-leaf poison (Gastrolobium stenophyllum Turcz.), mallet poison (Gastrolobium densifolium C.A. Gardn.), wall-flower poison (Gastrolobium grandifolorum F. Muell)," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 12 : No. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol12/iss1/5 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. POISON PLANTS OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA The toxic species of the genera Gastrolobium and Oxylobium THICK-LEAF POISON (Gastrolobium crass/fo//um Benth.) NARROW-LEAF POISON (Gastrolobium stenophyllum Turcz.) MALLET POISON (Gastrolobium densifolium C.
    [Show full text]