DOCSLIB.ORG

Revised Panther Creek Watershed TMDL Schuylkill and Carbon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revised Panther Creek Watershed TMDL Schuylkill and Carbon Revised Panther Creek Watershed TMDL Schuylkill and Carbon Counties For Acid Mine Drainage Affected Segments Prepared by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection June 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Directions to the Panther Creek Watershed .............................................................................................................. 4 Segments addressed in this TMDL ........................................................................................................................... 4 Clean Water Act Requirements ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section 303(d) Listing Process ................................................................................................................................. 6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL ...................................................................................................................... 6 Watershed History .................................................................................................................................................... 7 AMD Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Changes in TMDLs That May Require EPA Approval .......................................................................................... 12 Changes in TMDLs That May Not Require EPA Approval ................................................................................... 12 TMDL Endpoints .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS) ....................................................................................................................... 13 Allocation Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Recommendations and Reasonable Assurance ....................................................................................................... 16 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................................. 19 TABLES Table 1. Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report – Streams, Category 5 Waterbodies, Pollutants Requiring a TMDL………………………………………………………….. 3 Table 2. Mining Permit in the Panther Creek Watershed TMDL………………………….. …………………. 9 Table 3. Applicable Water Quality Criteria ............................................................................................................... 13 Table 4. NPDES permits in the Panther Creek Watershed not receiving individual waste load allocations for metals ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 5. Combined Waste Load Allocations for BET Associates Outfalls 001, 003, 004 and 005………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………15 Table 6. Summary Table - Panther Creek Watershed………………………………………………………………..15 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Panther Creek Watershed Map ............................................................................................................................... 20 Attachment B ................................................................................................................................................ 22 The pH Method ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 Attachment C ................................................................................................................................................ 26 TMDLs By Segment ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Attachment D ................................................................................................................................................ 30 Excerpts Justifying Changes To The Section 303(d) Lists and Integrated Report/List .......................................... 30 Attachment E ................................................................................................................................................ 33 Water Quality Dataset Used In TMDL Calculations .............................................................................................. 33 Attachment F................................................................................................................................................. 55 Panther Creek Upstream/Downstream of Slum Creek ............................................................................................ 55 Attachment G ................................................................................................................................................ 57 2008 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Streams, Category 5, Waterbodies, Pollutants Requiring a TMDL .......................................................................................................... 57 Attachment H………………………………………………………………………………………………………...57 Comment and Response Document………………………………………………………… ………………….. 57 2 Panther Creek Watershed Schuylkill County, PA Introduction This report presents the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) developed for impaired stream segments in the Panther Creek Watershed (Attachment A). These were done to address the impairments noted on the 1996 Pennsylvania Section 303(d) list, and subsequent lists of impaired waters, required under the Clean Water Act, and covers the stream segments shown in Table 1. High levels of metals are the cause for these impairments. All impairments resulted from drainage from abandoned coalmines. The TMDL addresses the three primary metals associated with acid mine drainage (iron, manganese, aluminum) and pH. The Panther Creek TMDL is being revised to reflect significant changes in the watershed since the original Panther Creek TMDL was developed including the new treatment proposal of the Route 309 discharge. The TMDL for the Little Schuylkill River, to which Panther Creek flows, is being revised concurrently. Table 1. Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Streams, Category 5 Waterbodies, Pollutants Requiring a TMDL Hydrologic Unit Code: 02040203 Schuylkill Stream Name Use Designation (Assessment ID) Cause Date Listed TMDL Date Source Panther Creek HUC: 02040203 Aquatic Life (719) - 6.48 miles; 4 Segment(s)* Abandoned Mine Drainage Metals 1996 2009 Industrial Point Source Unknown Toxicity 2002 2015 Surface Mining Siltation 1998 2014** Slum Creek HUC: 02040203 Aquatic Life (727) - 1.58 miles; 3 Segment(s)* Industrial Point Source Other Organics 2002 2015 Industrial Point Source Unknown Toxicity 2002 2015 *Segments are defined as individual COM IDs. ** Siltation TMDL for Little Schuykill Watershed. Panther Creek/Slum Creek specific TMDL may be developed in the future. Report Summary Watershed Summary Stream Miles Assessment Units Segments (COMIDs) Watershed Characteristics 9.11 2 9 3 Impairment Summary Source Cause Miles Assessment Segments Units (COMIDs) Abandoned Mine Drainage Metals 6.48 1 4 Industrial Point Source Other Organics 1.58 1 3 Industrial Point Source Unknown Toxicity 8.06 2 7 Surface Mining Siltation 6.48 1 4 8.06** 2** 7** **Totals reflect actual miles of impaired stream. Each stream segment may have multiple impairments (different sources or causes contributing to the impairment). So the sum of individual impairment numbers may not add up to the totals shown. Use Designation Summary Miles Assessment Units Segments (COMIDs) Aquatic Life 6.06 2 7 Directions to the Panther Creek Watershed Panther Creek originates approximately 0.5 miles east of the Borough of Lansford in Carbon County. The stream flows southwesterly until reaching the Little Schuylkill River at Tamaqua. Panther Creek can be accessed from Interstate 81 at the Hometown Exit. Travel east on State Route 54 towards Hometown. In Hometown turn right onto State Route 309 and head south towards Tamaqua. In Tamaqua turn left onto US Route 209 and travel approximately a ¼ of a mile to where the stream crosses under US Route 209. The stream runs along the north side of US Route 209 from Tamaqua until the headwaters east of Lansford. Panther Creek is found on the 7 ½-minute Tamaqua and Nesquehoning quadrangles. It exists in State Water Plan 03 A and HUC 02040203. Segments addressed in this TMDL There is an active discharge in the Panther Creek Watershed. The Lehigh Coal and Navigation (LCN) permit has been transferred to BET Associates to operate the current anthracite surface mining operation. The permitted discharge that previously discharged to the Little Schuylkill River will be discharging to Panther Creek and is included in this revised TMDL. Because of its proximity to Route 309
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hiking 34 Mountain Biking 37 Bird Watching 38 Hunting 38 Horseback Riding 38 Rock Climbing 40 Gliding 40 Watersports 41 Shopping 44 Antiquing 45 Craft Hunting 45
    dventure Guide to the Great Smoky Mountains 2nd Edition Blair Howard HUNTER HUNTER PUBLISHING, INC. 130 Campus Drive Edison, NJ 08818-7816 % 732-225-1900 / 800-255-0343 / fax 732-417-1744 Web site: www.hunterpublishing.com E-mail: [email protected] IN CANADA: Ulysses Travel Publications 4176 Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec Canada H2W 2M5 % 514-843-9882 ext. 2232 / fax 514-843-9448 IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: Windsor Books International The Boundary, Wheatley Road, Garsington Oxford, OX44 9EJ England % 01865-361122 / fax 01865-361133 ISBN 1-55650-905-7 © 2001 Blair Howard All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, elec- tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. This guide focuses on recreational activities. As all such activities contain elements of risk, the publisher, author, affiliated individuals and compa- nies disclaim any responsibility for any injury, harm, or illness that may occur to anyone through, or by use of, the information in this book. Every effort was made to insure the accuracy of information in this book, but the publisher and author do not assume, and hereby disclaim, any liability or any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misleading information or potential travel problems caused by this guide, even if such errors or omis- sions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Cover photo by Michael H. Francis Maps by Kim André, © 2001 Hunter
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • SITE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Tonolli Corporation Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Ecological Characterization
    APPENDIX F SITE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Tonolli Corporation Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Ecological Characterization Prepared for Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 220 Continental Drive, Suite 311 Newark, Delaware 19713 Prepared by RMC Environmental Services, Inc. 3450 Schuylkill Road Spring City, Pennsylvania 19475 March 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................................... i i LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... i1 LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction ....................................................... 1 2.0 Site Location ....................................................... 2 3.0 Objectives of the Ecological Characterization ...................... 4 4.0 Scope .............................................................. 5 5.0 Methods ............................................................. 6 5.1 Terrestrial and Wetlands Habitat Characterization ............ 6 5.1.1 General ............................................... 6 5.1.2 Special Criteria for Wetland Identification ........... 9 5.2 Terrestrial and Wetland Fauna ................................ 12 5.3 Surface Water Resources ...................................... 12 5.3.1 Habitat Assessment .................................... 15 5.3.2 Macroinvertebrate Community ........................... 17 5.3.3 F1sh Community ........................................ 19 6.0 Findings ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER SCHUYLKILL RIVER TMDL WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania
    UPPER SCHUYLKILL RIVER TMDL WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania May 2005 Prepared by: Schuylkill Conservation District 1206 Ag Center Drive Pottsville, PA 17901 Schuylkill Headwaters Association, Inc. P.O. Box 1385 Pottsville, PA 17901 RETTEW Associates, Inc. Union Street Station 101 East Union Street Pottsville, PA 17901 For submission to: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and United States Environmental Protection Agency Funding to complete this plan was provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection through Section 319 of the Federal Clean Water Act administered by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. TABLE OF CONTENTS IDENTIFICATION AND SUMMARY OF PROBLEM AND POLLUTION SOURCES------------ 3 A. IMPAIRMENT OF WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC LIFE ----------------------------------------------10 B. TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDLS) -----------------------------------------------------------12 POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTIONS REQUIRED TO MEET TMDL--------------------------------21 MANAGEMENT MEASURES REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE PRESCRIBED LOAD REDUCTIONS------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------22 A. GENERAL REMEDIATION STRATEGIES AND DESIGN STANDARDS-----------------------------------22 B. CONSTRUCTED TREATMENT SYSTEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------28 C. FUTURE REMEDIATION PROJECTS-----------------------------------------------------------------------32 D. TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR OTHER DISCHARGES
    [Show full text]
  • Nesquehoning Creek Watershed TMDL Carbon County, Pennsylvania
    Nesquehoning Creek Watershed TMDL Carbon County, Pennsylvania Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection August 30, 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................................................................................4 Directions to the Nesquehoning Creek Watershed .....................................................................5 Segments addressed in this TMDL .............................................................................................5 Clean Water Act Requirements...................................................................................................6 303(d) List and Integrated Water Quality Report Listing Process..............................................6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL ........................................................................................7 Watershed History.......................................................................................................................8 AMD Methodology.....................................................................................................................9 TMDL Endpoints ......................................................................................................................11 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS).........................................................................................12 Allocation Summary .................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • LUPC Submissions
    STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION & FORESTRY LAND USE PLANNING COMMISSION 106 HOGAN ROAD, SUITE 8 WALTER E. WHITCOMB PAUL R. LEPAGE BANGOR, MAINE 04401 COMMISSIONER GOVERNOR NICHOLAS D. LIVESAY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Memorandum To: Interested Persons From: Stacie R. Beyer, Chief Planner Date: July 28, 2016 Re: Substantive Review, Milton Removal Petition Additional Materials for the Public Hearing ____________________________________________________________________________ LUPC staff has identified or prepared additional materials that may be beneficial to the Commission at the upcoming hearing on the Petition to Remove Milton Township from the Expedited Area for Wind Energy Development. LUPC staff plans to have these materials at the hearing and to enter them into the hearing record. The specific documents are as follows: 1. Milton Twp. Oxford County, Substantive Review. This is a map developed by the Land Use Planning Commission to show existing development and resources in the region, and assist the Commission in understanding testimony at the hearing. 2. Wind Energy Development Projects in Maine, a Combined List of DEP and LUPC Data. The Department of Environmental Protection data was pre-filed by that agency. 3. Wind Power and Wildlife in Maine: A State-wide Geographic Analysis of High-Value Wildlife Resources and Wind Power Classes, Susan Gallo, Wildlife Biologist, Maine Audubon, December 2013. Links to the Maine Audubon website and excerpts from the report were pre-filed by the Petition Circulator. Copies are enclosed for your reference. Any comments that you would like to submit regarding the content of these documents must be submitted to the Land Use Planning Commission by close of business on August 4, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of the Eastern North American and Eastern Asian Disjunct Genus Brachyelytrutn (Poaceae): Evidence from Morphology, Phytogeography and Aflps
    Systematic Botany (2003), 28(4): pp. 674-692 © Copyright 2003 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists A Taxonomic Revision of the Eastern North American and Eastern Asian Disjunct Genus Brachyelytrutn (Poaceae): Evidence from Morphology, Phytogeography and AFLPs JEFFERY M. SAARELA/'" PAUL M. PETERSON/ ROBERT J. SORENG/ and RALPH E. CHAPMAN^ 'Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9 Canada; ^Department of Systematic Biology • Botany Section, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. 20560-0166; -''Instructional Technology Resource Center, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209-8064; ''Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Thomas G. Lammers ABSTRACT. Morphological and phytogeographical data support the recognition of three distinct species in the genus Bmch/eïytrum: B. japonicum, B. ereclum, and B. aristosum. Bmchyelytrum japonicum is confined to eastern Asia and is charac- terized by narrow leaf blades (0.5-0.8 cm wide), long lower glumes {0.2-2.0 mm long), and long rachiUas (6.8-8.8 mm long). Bmchyelytrum ¿rectum is distributed throughout much of the eastern United States, from northwestern Minnesota south to central Louisiana, east to northern Florida and north to northeastern New York. Brachyelytrum erectum is characterized by long hispid hairs (0.2-0.9 mm long) on the veins of the lemma, wide lemmas (0.8-1.8 mm wide), and a conspicuous lemma mid-vein. Brachyelytrum aristosum has a more northern distribution, occurring in southern Canada from southern Ontario to Newfoundland, the northern adjacent United States and through the Appalachian mountains to northwestern North Carolina. Brachyelytrum aristosum is characterized by short scaberulous hairs (0.06-0.2 mm long) on the lemma and narrow lemmas (0.7-1.4 mm wide) that are weakly veined.
    [Show full text]
  • Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania
    Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania In partnership with the following major contributors and Technical Committee Organizations represented: The United States Geological Survey, PA Water Science Center Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., LLC (posthumously) Susquehanna River Basin Commission Dauphin County Conservation District Ian C. Palmer-Researcher PA Department of Environmental Protection-- Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Bureau of Deep Mine Safety, & Pottsville District Mining Office MINE WATER RESOURCES OF THE ANTHRACITE REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA Foreword: Dedication to Roger J. Hornberger, P.G. (Robert E. Hughes) PART 1. Mine Water of the Anthracite Region Chapter 1. Introduction to the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, and Roger J. Hornberger, P.G.) Chapter 2. Geology of the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., Caroline M. Loop, Keith B.C. Brady, P.G., Nathan A. Houtz, P.G.) Chapter 3. Colliery Development in the Anthracite Coal Fields (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., David L. Williams, Daniel J. Koury and Keith A. Laslow, P.G.) Chapter 4. A Geospatial Approach to Mapping the Anthracite Coal Fields (Michael A. Hewitt, Robert E. Hughes & Maynard L. (Mike) Dunn, Jr., P.G.) Chapter 5. The Development and Demise of Major Mining in the Northern Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., and Michael A. Hewitt) Chapter 6. The Development of Mining and Mine Drainage Tunnels of the Eastern Middle Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, Jerrald Hollowell. P.G., Keith A. Laslow, P.G., and Roger J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-02-02 010515__2021 Stocking Schedule All.Pdf
    Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission 2021 Trout Stocking Schedule (as of 2/1/2021, visit fishandboat.com/stocking for changes) County Water Sec Stocking Date BRK BRO RB GD Meeting Place Mtg Time Upper Limit Lower Limit Adams Bermudian Creek 2 4/6/2021 X X Fairfield PO - SR 116 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 2 3/15/2021 X X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 4 3/15/2021 X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 GREENBRIAR ROAD BRIDGE (T-619) SR 94 BRIDGE (SR0094) Adams Conewago Creek 3 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 3 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 4 4/22/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 10/6/2021 X X Letterkenny Reservoir 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 5 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Infantry Division Highway Corridor Study
    THIRD INFANTRY DIVISION HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STUDY Task 7 Study Alignments and Design Levels Draft Technical Memorandum 1. Executive Summary Section 1927 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA‐LU) (P.L. 109‐59) requires “a report that describes the steps and estimated funding necessary to designate and construct a route for the 3rd Infantry Division Highway,” extending from Savannah, Georgia to Knoxville, Tennessee, byy wa of Augusta, Georgia. The intent of this study is to develop planning level cost estimates for potential corridors connecting these urban areas. This information will be presented to Congress to fulfill the statutory language and present an overview of the steps necessary to construct such a corridor. The study is not intended to select an alternative for implementation; it will not necessarily lead to any further planning, design, right‐of‐way acquisition, or construction activities for any specific highway improvement. This technical memorandum recommends initial study corridors and design levels for the 3rd Infantry Division Highway corridors along with supporting justification and the rationale for the recommendations. Input from the Expert Working Group (EWG) was considered during the development of the Alignments and Design Levels. The EWG is a panel of area transportation officials and federal resource agencies that helps guide the project. The EWG serves as a sounding board to weigh technical options, examine issues from multiple perspectives and, by drawing upon its collective experience, help the team solve problems. Tasks 8‐9 in the study involve examining any corridors recommended for additional study in greater detail.
    [Show full text]