DOCSLIB.ORG

OREGON. During the Season of 1916 Charles Hartmann Extended Triangu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OREGON. TRIANGTTLATION STATIONS. Cline Falls, Heisler, Prineville, Bound Mountain, and Twickenham quadrangles. CROOK, JEFFERSON, AND WASCO COUNTIES. During the season of 1916 Charles Hartmann extended triangu- lation southwest from stations Pisgah and Wagner. Eleven new stations were occupied, and'nine points were located by intersections, all on approximate North American datum. For other positions in Oregon see U. S. Geological Survey Bulle­ tins 122, 216, 245, 440, 496, 551, and 644; Part I of the 18th, 19th, and 20th Annual Reports; and U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Special Publications No. 13 and No. 31. BLACK CRATER, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREG. (Not occupied). A conical butte on an east spur of the Cascade Range, about 9 miles west of Sisters post office. The McKenzie road crosses the range about 2 miles north of station. Station mark: Cairn on highest part of butte. [Latitude 44° 15' 59.17" (H); 44° 15' 59.3" (S). Longitude 121° 44' 50.72" (H); 121° 44' 51.5" (S.) To station Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. 0 1 II Log. meters. Miles. 58 31 49.3 238 17 37.5 4.50327 19.80 Scott (S)......................................... 78 07 11.3 258 00 12.6 4. 13374 8.45 79 34 10.1 259 18 11.5 4. 49155 19.27 GrayButte(H).................................. 251 47 54.0 72 15 02.7 4. 7345382 33. 720 Cline Butte (H). ................................. 272 09 43.9 92 28 22.3 4.5511577 22.106 Pilot Butte (H). ................................. 301 19 54.2 121 39 22.0 4. 6401944 27. 126 (Expositions by Hartmann; (S)-=positions by Staack in 1916. CLINE BUTTE, CROOK COUNTY, OREG. An isolated butte immediately southwest of Cline Falls; best reached from Cline Falls by taking wagon road leading to town of Sisters for about 4 miles west, thence south by a well-defined homesteaders' road to the northwest base of main ridge lead­ ing to summit. Thence follow the ridge up to summit of butte. It is easy to go on horseback from the base of the ridge to the station. Signal: A juniper tree 18 feet high, in the top of which was erected a 10-foot pole with two 4 by 5 foot targets. Station mark: A bronze triangulation tablet, cemented in solid rock 12.6 feet southwest of signal. True azimuth from tablet to tree, 244° 03'. 12.116$° 23 Bull, 70$ 23 347 348 TRIANGULATION AND PRIMARY TRAVERSE, 1916-1918. [Latitude 44° 15' 12.56". Longitude 121° 18' 08.27".] To station- Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. 0 / II Log. meters. Miles. 6 27 58 186 25 47 4. 57380 23.289 49 05 30 ' 227 55 35 4. 40694 15.860 Black Crater. ... ................................. 92 28 22.3 272 09 43.9 4. 5511577 22. 106 196 11 29.49 16 15 22.14 4.4210817 16.384 Railroad Pier .................................... 209 20 06 29 24 36 4. 24462 10. 914 221 29 14.64 41 37 43.23 4.3856762 15. 102 221 31 15 41 36 22 4. 16761 9.140 228 38 40.02 48 58 23.13 4. 6965862 30.899 258 31 36 < 78 36 55 4.01465 6.427 283 56 24.40 104 10 03.05 4. 4290545 16.688 Pine ............................................. 327 53 00 148 08 34 4. 75170 35.079 355 37 22.55 175 38 13.76 4.3311839 13. 721 GRAY BTJTTE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREG. A sharp-pointed butte 7 miles east of Opal City. Best reached by taking road east from Opal City to 0. M. Cyrus's ranch. Go 0.25 mile south across field to drain, thonce follow drain up to main ridge. Signal and reference mark: Cairn 8 feet high, with a 6-foot base. Station mark: A bronze triangulation tablet, cemented in shale rock and 9.1 feet south of signal. True azimuth from tablet to cairn, 182° 56'. [Latitude 44° 25' 01.76". Longitude 121° 06' 00.52".] To station Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. 0 1 II Log. meters. Miles. 20 24 39 200 21 30 4. 23590 10. 697 41 34 37 221 31 16 3. 98201 5.962 Cline Butte. ..................................... 41 37 43.23 221 29 14.64 4. 3856762 15. 102 45 00 40 224 42 16 4. 69674 30.909 62 49 12.4 242 21 05.5 4. 7805197 37.486 69 01 35 248 57 39 3.90498 4.993 72 15 02.7 251 47 54.0 4. 7345382 33. 720 129 16 13.84 309 11 37.21 4. 0521743 7.007 Teller Butte. .................................... 211 04 04.56 31 13 00.19 4. 5131818 20. 255 227 15 23.14 47 28 54.43 4.5406960 21.580 235 31 41. 69 55 42 56.59 4.4114538 16.025 265 57 25.34 86 33 46.30 4. 8390938 42. 898 279 28 53.84 99 59 27.16 4. 7700475 36.593 338 08 58.14 158 14 09.67 4. 4250841 16.536 20 12 53.06 200 05 16.62 4.6247102 26. 185 JUNIPER BUTTE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREG. A double-topped butte 1.5 miles south of Culver and 1.5 miles north of Opal City. Best reached by taking road south from Culver toward Opal City to divide, thence turn west and go up main ridge to summit. Station is situated on the highest point of the east ridge. Signal and reference mark: A 7-foot cairn, having a 6-foot base and two 3 by 4 foot targets on top. Station mark: A bronze tablet cemented in shale rock 9.5 feet.northeast of signal. True azimuth from tablet to cairn, 27° 22'. [Latitude 44° 28' 52.82". Longitude 121° 12' 35.55".] To station Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. Log. meters. Miles. 16 15 22.14 196 11 29.49 4. 4210817 16.384 230 47 54.47 51 01 27.67 4. 5176858 20. 466 244 16 51.35 64 35 00.25 4. 5794976 23.597 255 57 21.50 76 13 13.74 4. 4900307 19.204 309 11 37.21 129 16 13.84 4. 0521743 7.007 Powell Butte.. ................................... 329 34 59.59 149 44 47.37 4. 5669179 22.923 350 33 00 170 34 15 4. 16163 9.015 OREGON". 349 LAVA, CROOK COUNTY, OREG. About 11 miles due south of the town of Bend. Signal: A white flag and target on a pole 15 feet high. Under the target is a cone- shaped pile of logs 8 feet in diameter at the base and 6 feet high. Signal is on the highest point of the butte. Monument was established by members of the National Forest Service, of Bend, Oreg., and description was furnished by Forest Supervisor. Sights were taken to Forest Service signal. [Latitude 43° 55' 05.90". Longitude 121° 21' 17.44".] To station- Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. Log. meters. Miles. dine Butte...................................... 186 25 47 6 27 58 4. 57380 23. 289 Pilot Butte.... .................................. 200 13 28 20 16 30 4. 22820 10.509 Powell Butte.. ................................... 224 30 33 44 46 19 4, 63524 26. 828 LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN, CROOK COUNTY, OREG. Best reached by taking road from Prineville to Ochoco ranger station, 26 miles, thence go 0.5 mile east and take road to right leading to Big Summit Prairie. Con­ tinue on this road until the divide is reached, thence take road to right to quicksilver mines, and from here take road leading up the mountain to station. It is a three-hour drive from Ochoco ranger station, and the distance is about 9 miles. Signal and reference mark: Cairn 7 feet high by 6 feet wide with two 3 by 4 foot targets nailed on a 4 by 4 inch pole 15 feet high standing in center of cairn. Station mark: A triangulation tablet 7.1 feet northwest of cairn, cemented in large rock. True azimuth from tablet to cairn, 317° 24'. [Latitude 44° 19' 39.09". Longitude 120° 22' 18.95".] To station Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. Log. meters. Miles. Powell Butte... .................................. 73 13 01.39 252 47 43.01 4. 7029651 31.356 99 59 27.16 279 28 53.84 4. 7700475 36. 593 Sheep Kock ...................................... 123 55 40.15 303 26 19.06 4. 6446228 27. 414 Pisgah........................................... 217 00 41.23 37 06 26.46 4. 2582450 11. 261 MAUPIN BUTTE (2), WASCO COUNTY, OREG. A haystack-shaped butte, facing northwest and southeast 8 miles southeast of Antelope. Easily reached by taking the Shaniko-Clarno road to Cox's ranch, 4.5 miles southeast of Antelope and 1 mile northeast of Gold Camp, where Harry Smith resides; thence continue up drain, following dim road, until summit is reached.. Signal is readily seen from the summit. Signal: A cairn 5 feet high with a 6-foot base, having a-large juniper bush standing in its center. It is.7.2 feet north of station mark. True azimuth.from cairn to station mark, 351° 21'. Station mark: A triangulation tablet cemented in solid rock. [Latitude 44° 52' 51.44". Longitude 120° 36' 51.64".] To station- Azimuth. Back azimuth. Distance. Log. meters. Miles. 4 55 07.76 184 54 19.66 4. 2435994 10.888 24 58 44.93 204 51 48.23 4. 4898828 19. 197 Teller Butte.. .................................... 42 35 56.93 222 24 23.01 4. 5060285 19. 924 300 55 32.43 121 03 35.93 4. 2447190 10. 916 350 TRIANGULATION AND PRIMARY TRAVERSE, 1916-1918. NORTH SISTER, LANE, AND DESCHUTES COUNTIES, OREG. (Not occupied.) In main Cascade Range, on the northern one of three buttes, locally known as the Three Sisters.
Recommended publications
  • Hiking 34 Mountain Biking 37 Bird Watching 38 Hunting 38 Horseback Riding 38 Rock Climbing 40 Gliding 40 Watersports 41 Shopping 44 Antiquing 45 Craft Hunting 45

    Hiking 34 Mountain Biking 37 Bird Watching 38 Hunting 38 Horseback Riding 38 Rock Climbing 40 Gliding 40 Watersports 41 Shopping 44 Antiquing 45 Craft Hunting 45

    dventure Guide to the Great Smoky Mountains 2nd Edition Blair Howard HUNTER HUNTER PUBLISHING, INC. 130 Campus Drive Edison, NJ 08818-7816 % 732-225-1900 / 800-255-0343 / fax 732-417-1744 Web site: www.hunterpublishing.com E-mail: [email protected] IN CANADA: Ulysses Travel Publications 4176 Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec Canada H2W 2M5 % 514-843-9882 ext. 2232 / fax 514-843-9448 IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: Windsor Books International The Boundary, Wheatley Road, Garsington Oxford, OX44 9EJ England % 01865-361122 / fax 01865-361133 ISBN 1-55650-905-7 © 2001 Blair Howard All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, elec- tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. This guide focuses on recreational activities. As all such activities contain elements of risk, the publisher, author, affiliated individuals and compa- nies disclaim any responsibility for any injury, harm, or illness that may occur to anyone through, or by use of, the information in this book. Every effort was made to insure the accuracy of information in this book, but the publisher and author do not assume, and hereby disclaim, any liability or any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misleading information or potential travel problems caused by this guide, even if such errors or omis- sions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Cover photo by Michael H. Francis Maps by Kim André, © 2001 Hunter
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G

    A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G

    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
  • UPPER SCHUYLKILL RIVER TMDL WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania

    UPPER SCHUYLKILL RIVER TMDL WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania

    UPPER SCHUYLKILL RIVER TMDL WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania May 2005 Prepared by: Schuylkill Conservation District 1206 Ag Center Drive Pottsville, PA 17901 Schuylkill Headwaters Association, Inc. P.O. Box 1385 Pottsville, PA 17901 RETTEW Associates, Inc. Union Street Station 101 East Union Street Pottsville, PA 17901 For submission to: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and United States Environmental Protection Agency Funding to complete this plan was provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection through Section 319 of the Federal Clean Water Act administered by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. TABLE OF CONTENTS IDENTIFICATION AND SUMMARY OF PROBLEM AND POLLUTION SOURCES------------ 3 A. IMPAIRMENT OF WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC LIFE ----------------------------------------------10 B. TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDLS) -----------------------------------------------------------12 POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTIONS REQUIRED TO MEET TMDL--------------------------------21 MANAGEMENT MEASURES REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE PRESCRIBED LOAD REDUCTIONS------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------22 A. GENERAL REMEDIATION STRATEGIES AND DESIGN STANDARDS-----------------------------------22 B. CONSTRUCTED TREATMENT SYSTEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------28 C. FUTURE REMEDIATION PROJECTS-----------------------------------------------------------------------32 D. TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR OTHER DISCHARGES
  • LUPC Submissions

    LUPC Submissions

    STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION & FORESTRY LAND USE PLANNING COMMISSION 106 HOGAN ROAD, SUITE 8 WALTER E. WHITCOMB PAUL R. LEPAGE BANGOR, MAINE 04401 COMMISSIONER GOVERNOR NICHOLAS D. LIVESAY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Memorandum To: Interested Persons From: Stacie R. Beyer, Chief Planner Date: July 28, 2016 Re: Substantive Review, Milton Removal Petition Additional Materials for the Public Hearing ____________________________________________________________________________ LUPC staff has identified or prepared additional materials that may be beneficial to the Commission at the upcoming hearing on the Petition to Remove Milton Township from the Expedited Area for Wind Energy Development. LUPC staff plans to have these materials at the hearing and to enter them into the hearing record. The specific documents are as follows: 1. Milton Twp. Oxford County, Substantive Review. This is a map developed by the Land Use Planning Commission to show existing development and resources in the region, and assist the Commission in understanding testimony at the hearing. 2. Wind Energy Development Projects in Maine, a Combined List of DEP and LUPC Data. The Department of Environmental Protection data was pre-filed by that agency. 3. Wind Power and Wildlife in Maine: A State-wide Geographic Analysis of High-Value Wildlife Resources and Wind Power Classes, Susan Gallo, Wildlife Biologist, Maine Audubon, December 2013. Links to the Maine Audubon website and excerpts from the report were pre-filed by the Petition Circulator. Copies are enclosed for your reference. Any comments that you would like to submit regarding the content of these documents must be submitted to the Land Use Planning Commission by close of business on August 4, 2016.
  • A Taxonomic Revision of the Eastern North American and Eastern Asian Disjunct Genus Brachyelytrutn (Poaceae): Evidence from Morphology, Phytogeography and Aflps

    A Taxonomic Revision of the Eastern North American and Eastern Asian Disjunct Genus Brachyelytrutn (Poaceae): Evidence from Morphology, Phytogeography and Aflps

    Systematic Botany (2003), 28(4): pp. 674-692 © Copyright 2003 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists A Taxonomic Revision of the Eastern North American and Eastern Asian Disjunct Genus Brachyelytrutn (Poaceae): Evidence from Morphology, Phytogeography and AFLPs JEFFERY M. SAARELA/'" PAUL M. PETERSON/ ROBERT J. SORENG/ and RALPH E. CHAPMAN^ 'Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9 Canada; ^Department of Systematic Biology • Botany Section, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. 20560-0166; -''Instructional Technology Resource Center, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209-8064; ''Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Thomas G. Lammers ABSTRACT. Morphological and phytogeographical data support the recognition of three distinct species in the genus Bmch/eïytrum: B. japonicum, B. ereclum, and B. aristosum. Bmchyelytrum japonicum is confined to eastern Asia and is charac- terized by narrow leaf blades (0.5-0.8 cm wide), long lower glumes {0.2-2.0 mm long), and long rachiUas (6.8-8.8 mm long). Bmchyelytrum ¿rectum is distributed throughout much of the eastern United States, from northwestern Minnesota south to central Louisiana, east to northern Florida and north to northeastern New York. Brachyelytrum erectum is characterized by long hispid hairs (0.2-0.9 mm long) on the veins of the lemma, wide lemmas (0.8-1.8 mm wide), and a conspicuous lemma mid-vein. Brachyelytrum aristosum has a more northern distribution, occurring in southern Canada from southern Ontario to Newfoundland, the northern adjacent United States and through the Appalachian mountains to northwestern North Carolina. Brachyelytrum aristosum is characterized by short scaberulous hairs (0.06-0.2 mm long) on the lemma and narrow lemmas (0.7-1.4 mm wide) that are weakly veined.
  • Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania

    Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania

    Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania In partnership with the following major contributors and Technical Committee Organizations represented: The United States Geological Survey, PA Water Science Center Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., LLC (posthumously) Susquehanna River Basin Commission Dauphin County Conservation District Ian C. Palmer-Researcher PA Department of Environmental Protection-- Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Bureau of Deep Mine Safety, & Pottsville District Mining Office MINE WATER RESOURCES OF THE ANTHRACITE REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA Foreword: Dedication to Roger J. Hornberger, P.G. (Robert E. Hughes) PART 1. Mine Water of the Anthracite Region Chapter 1. Introduction to the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, and Roger J. Hornberger, P.G.) Chapter 2. Geology of the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., Caroline M. Loop, Keith B.C. Brady, P.G., Nathan A. Houtz, P.G.) Chapter 3. Colliery Development in the Anthracite Coal Fields (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., David L. Williams, Daniel J. Koury and Keith A. Laslow, P.G.) Chapter 4. A Geospatial Approach to Mapping the Anthracite Coal Fields (Michael A. Hewitt, Robert E. Hughes & Maynard L. (Mike) Dunn, Jr., P.G.) Chapter 5. The Development and Demise of Major Mining in the Northern Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., and Michael A. Hewitt) Chapter 6. The Development of Mining and Mine Drainage Tunnels of the Eastern Middle Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, Jerrald Hollowell. P.G., Keith A. Laslow, P.G., and Roger J.
  • Third Infantry Division Highway Corridor Study

    Third Infantry Division Highway Corridor Study

    THIRD INFANTRY DIVISION HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STUDY Task 7 Study Alignments and Design Levels Draft Technical Memorandum 1. Executive Summary Section 1927 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA‐LU) (P.L. 109‐59) requires “a report that describes the steps and estimated funding necessary to designate and construct a route for the 3rd Infantry Division Highway,” extending from Savannah, Georgia to Knoxville, Tennessee, byy wa of Augusta, Georgia. The intent of this study is to develop planning level cost estimates for potential corridors connecting these urban areas. This information will be presented to Congress to fulfill the statutory language and present an overview of the steps necessary to construct such a corridor. The study is not intended to select an alternative for implementation; it will not necessarily lead to any further planning, design, right‐of‐way acquisition, or construction activities for any specific highway improvement. This technical memorandum recommends initial study corridors and design levels for the 3rd Infantry Division Highway corridors along with supporting justification and the rationale for the recommendations. Input from the Expert Working Group (EWG) was considered during the development of the Alignments and Design Levels. The EWG is a panel of area transportation officials and federal resource agencies that helps guide the project. The EWG serves as a sounding board to weigh technical options, examine issues from multiple perspectives and, by drawing upon its collective experience, help the team solve problems. Tasks 8‐9 in the study involve examining any corridors recommended for additional study in greater detail.
  • Anthracite Region

    Anthracite Region

    D&L Trail іљђȱ юџјђџȱ џюіљѕђюёȱѐѐђѠѠȱ юћёȱ юћёњюџјȱ ќѤћѠ Trail Map & Guide 152 140 130 121 108 Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Seven Tubs Black Diamond¦¨§81 White Haven Rockport Glen Onoko Barrys LN 29 W White Haven Lehigh Gorge State Park UV Trail os i T H &L (Prop ed) lk (! D e Library 2 miles to Seven Tubs (!T H s B Lehigh Gorge State Park runs south along the river from White Wilkes-Barre Nature Area a 81 Laurel Run Buffalo ST r ¦¨§ re 10 miles to S T H Haven to Jim Thorpe. This 26-mile stretch of near-wilderness is Anthracite 309 Laurel ST T (! k UV Hemlock ST Black Diamond e Berwick ST 437 home to breathtaking mountain and river views as the Lehigh e r C n il 115 Oak ST Lehigh Gorge River carves its way southward. Along the shore, cyclists, o a L Tr UV m Oliver Mills D& rafters, hikers, cross-country skiers, and even snowmobilers o State Park l 940 Region State Game S o ) 940 can admire the remains of the railroad and canal locks. Both osed White Haven rop l (P Wilkes-Barre to Mountain Top Ma Jim Thorpe and White Haven are home to professional ai ple Vine ST D&L Tr ST State Game Alleghen ęĴȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ¢ȱ Lands 207 The Northern Terminus of the D&L Trail lands y S r T l e State i ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǰȱȱ ȱĴȱ a v v i in the Lheartands 2of92 Wilkes-Barre, on theGa me r A R service.
  • Scenic Byways

    Scenic Byways

    n c s c e n i c b y w a y s a h c rol rt in o a n fourth edition s c s en ay ic byw North Carolina Department of Transportation Table of ConTenTs Click on Byway. Introduction Legend NCDOT Programs Rules of the Road Cultural Resources Blue Ridge Parkway Scenic Byways State Map MOuntains Waterfall Byway Nantahala Byway Cherohala Skyway Indian Lakes Scenic Byway Whitewater Way Forest Heritage Scenic Byway appalachian Medley French Broad Overview Historic Flat Rock Scenic Byway Drovers Road Black Mountain Rag Pacolet River Byway South Mountain Scenery Mission Crossing Little Parkway New River Valley Byway I-26 Scenic Highway u.S. 421 Scenic Byway Pisgah Loop Scenic Byway upper Yadkin Way Yadkin Valley Scenic Byway Smoky Mountain Scenic Byway Mt. Mitchell Scenic Drive PIedmont Hanging Rock Scenic Byway Colonial Heritage Byway Football Road Crowders Mountain Drive Mill Bridge Scenic Byway 2 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP Table of ConTenTs uwharrie Scenic Road Rolling Kansas Byway Pee Dee Valley Drive Grassy Island Crossing Sandhills Scenic Drive Birkhead Wilderness Route Flint Hill Ramble Indian Heritage Trail Pottery Road Devil’s Stompin’ Ground Road North Durham Country Byway averasboro Battlefield Scenic Byway Clayton Bypass Scenic Byway Scots-Welsh Heritage Byway COastaL PLain Blue-Gray Scenic Byway Meteor Lakes Byway Green Swamp Byway Brunswick Town Road Cape Fear Historic Byway Lafayette’s Tour Tar Heel Trace edenton-Windsor Loop Perquimans Crossing Pamlico Scenic Byway alligator River Route Roanoke Voyages Corridor Outer Banks Scenic Byway State Parks & Recreation areas Historic Sites For More Information Bibliography 3 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP inTroduction The N.C.
  • Department of Environmental Resources Review Notice

    Department of Environmental Resources Review Notice

    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES REVIEW NOTICE This report, prepared by outside consultants, has been reviewed by the Department of Environmental Resources and ap- proved for publication. The contents indicate the conditions that are existing as determined by the consultant, and the consultant’s recommendations for correction of the problems. The foregoing does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the policies, views, or approval of the Department. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Definition of the Study 1 Location and Topography 2 Exhibits 1 and 2 Geology 4 Drainage 5 Exhibits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM General 6 Sources of Acid Mine Drainage 8 Wabash Valley 8 - 21 Panther Valley 21 - 37 Little Schuylkill Valley 37 - 51 Exhibit 9 WATER QUALITY General 52 Natural Stream Quality 53 Exhibits 10 and 11 Acid. Mine Drainage in the little Schuylkill Basin 55 Quality of Streams Affected by Acid Mine Drainage 58 Exhibits 12 through 19 Impact of Mine Pumpage on Stream Quality 64 Exhibit 20 MINE DRAINAGE ABATEMENT Consideration of Abatement Methods 70 Abatement from Surface Reclamation 72 Abatement from Subsurface Drainage Control 76 Summary of Abatement Analysis 78 Significance of Results 78 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 84 APPENDIX A - Water Quality Data From Routine Sampling Program APPENDIX B - Acidity and Acid Loads from Detailed Studies of Surface Discharges Exhibits 21 through 29 APPENDIX C - Mine Drainage Abatement Exhibits 30 through 36 ### INTRODUCTION A . DEFINITION OF STUDY This report has been prepared and is submitted in fulfillment of Contract SL-167 between A. W. Martin Associates, Inc. and the Common- wealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Planning and Developmental Research The contract is for an Engin- eering Survey of the watershed of the Little Schuylkill River Basin for the development of a plan for the abatement of mine drainage pollution.
  • Revised Panther Creek Watershed TMDL Schuylkill and Carbon

    Revised Panther Creek Watershed TMDL Schuylkill and Carbon

    Revised Panther Creek Watershed TMDL Schuylkill and Carbon Counties For Acid Mine Drainage Affected Segments Prepared by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection June 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Directions to the Panther Creek Watershed .............................................................................................................. 4 Segments addressed in this TMDL ........................................................................................................................... 4 Clean Water Act Requirements ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section 303(d) Listing Process ................................................................................................................................. 6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL ...................................................................................................................... 6 Watershed History .................................................................................................................................................... 7 AMD Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Changes in TMDLs That May Require EPA Approval .........................................................................................
  • NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2021 BIENNIAL REPORT Compiled

    NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2021 BIENNIAL REPORT Compiled

    Roy Cooper Governor D. Reid Wilson Secretary, Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Walter Clark Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship Executive Director, NC Land and Water Fund NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2021 BIENNIAL REPORT Compiled by Misty Buchanan, Deputy Director for Natural Heritage Division of Land and Water Stewardship Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, North Carolina www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF 2019-2020 .................................................................................................................... 2 INFORMATION SERVICES ................................................................................................................................................. 2 INVENTORY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 NATURAL AREA CONSERVATION ............................................................................................................................ 19 NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM STAFF ............................................................................................................... 26 MAJOR ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR 2021-2022 ................................................................................................. 27 APPENDIX A: PUBLICATIONS AND REPORTS .................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B: BIENNIAL PROTECTION