DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings Timber Bridge Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proceedings Timber Bridge Conference COST Timber Bridge Conference – CTBC 2014 25–26 September 2014 Bern University of Applied Sciences Biel, Switzerland Edited by Steffen Franke Bettina Franke Robert Widmann ‣ Institute for Timber Construction, Structures and Architecture COST ACTION FP1004 and FP1101 COST TIMBER BRIDGE CONFERENCE CTBC 2014 September 25-26, 2014 Bern University of Applied Sciences, Institute for Timber Construction, Structures and Architecture Biel, Switzerland Edited by Steffen Franke Bettina Franke Robert Widmann ECOST-MEETING-FP1004-240914-048999 ISBN 978-3-9523787-4-8 Published by Bern University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland Institute for Timber Construction, Structures and Architecture All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise without per- mission in writing of the publisher. I PREFACE Bridges are the most demanding of structures. They are often long-span, subject to large and variable dynamic loads, exposed to the weather, require low maintainance and, being seen as “gateway” or “landmark” structures by the public, are subject to close scrutiny. Timber bridges occupy a special place within the timber engineering community. For many professionals in- volved in this field, from the planning engineer, to the timber manufacturer and to the responsible for the opera- tion and maintenance – the owner -, timber bridges represent the highest achievement in the art and science of wooden architecture and construction. Within Europe (and in the rest of the world) there are many different approaches to deal with this topic. The history of the wooden bridges has seen many stories – for example the ones old bridges which have survived for centuries, and of those in need of repair or even demolition after only a decade of being in use. The combination of large spans with heavy loads and major climatic actions on bridges is a big challenge for everybody involved in planning, constructing and maintaining these special timber structures. This requires that all effected parties have, in addition to the possibly large emotional devotion to such an object, above all, an extensive knowledge and experience in the planning, implementation and maintenance of timber bridges. Since timber bridges are not built in a dozen every day, it is important that an active exchange of knowledge between parties takes place. This is what the COST Timber Bridges Conference CTBC2014 in Biel aims to contribute to. At this conference, which is jointly supported by the COST Actions FP1004 and FP1101, young researchers as well as old hands in the field of timber bridges get the opportunity to share their own knowledge while –at the same time- learning from others. The joint participation of the two Cost Actions, FP1004 focusing on Enhamce- ment of mechanical properties of timber products and structures, FP1101 focusing on Assessment, Strengthening and Monitoring of existing timber Structures, ensures that a vast field of knowledge is being covered. This ranges from the enhancement of wooden materials and components for new timber bridges to the assessment, strengthening and monitoring of existing bridges, both modern and historic ones. Following the conference, in which the theoretical foundations are highlighted, a field trip and excursion to existing old and new timber bridges will provide the opportunity to learn from real cases and continue the knowledge exchange on-site. The programme of the conference is designed to stimulate and facilitate discussion from the delegates, and we hope that it will contribute to build bridges between young and old researchers, theorist and practitioners as well as between fellows from regions with high timber bridges "populations" and people coming from regions where even the term "timber bridge" sounds very strange. Besides the genuine interest for the subject, that gave us the impetous to organize this event, building these last mentioned bridges is a main goal of the COST framework. Let's go for it! Representing the organizing committee Robert Widmann - Co Organizer Steffen Franke – Organizer and Host Bettina Franke – Organizer and Host Dina D'Ayala - Chair COST Action FP1101 Richard Harris - Chair COST Action FP1004 September 2014 II About COST Action FP1004 Enhance mechanical properties of timber, engineered wood products and timber structures Timber and wood-based engineered products are becoming very important as structural materials, especially in the drive towards sustainable technologies and construction. For structural wooden products, it is very important to improve their properties to be more competitive and reliable as a sustainable low-carbon material and a major contributor to affordable buildings. This applies particularly to larger, more complicated structures where timber is becoming a realistic alternative. This Action aims to boost the performance of structural timber products and construction, thereby improving use of timber in construction in existing and new applications. This includes the enhanced predictability and reliabil- ity of timber structures. Improving the mechanical performance of connections and reinforcing timber in weak zones are large-scale research domains in Europe, which will require coordination and scientific/engineering approaches. This COST Action will deliver increased knowledge of improving strengthening, stiffening and toughening techniques, modeling enhanced performance and experience in real projects to create new opportuni- ties for timber construction. Exchanging information will highlight gaps in knowledge and inform future work and potential collaboration between research groups, supporting timber construction and its wider uptake in the European construction industry. This Action may also create opportunities for patenting possible new technolo- gies and products for reinforcing timber mechanical properties. The scientific program is divided into three main scientific areas expressed as Work Groups (WG) with the same aims but different perspectives: WG 1: Enhance performance of connections and structural timber in weak zones • Identifying and categorising weak zones (type of failure, relevance) and respective mechanical proper- ties; • Grouping of connections (load level, type of failure, dissipation of energy); • Using glued-in rods or self-tapping screws as reinforcements; • Using densified wood or modified wood; • Using other Engineered Wood Products (EWP) e.g. plywood, LVL or cross-laminated timber (CLT) as reinforcement; • Using fibre reinforced polymers (FRPs) as reinforcement WG 2: Enhance the mechanical properties of heavy timber structures with particular emphasis to timber bridges • Identification of properties to be enhanced; • More effective timber decks as a result of effective pre-stressing; • Increase stiffness and strength by reinforcement; • Energy dissipation capacity of structures. WG 3: Modeling the mechanical performance of enhanced wood-based systems • Identification of properties to be enhanced • Material properties needed in numerical models • Design and performance models of enhanced timber structures • Cracks parallel to the grain related to moisture content variations and different longitudinal shrinkage III About COST Action FP1101 Assessment, Reinforcement and Monitoring of Timber Structures In recent years, the use of timber in structures has become particularly important, considering that it is the only truly renewable building material and carbon storage. Timber has been used as structural material for centuries and numerous examples demonstrate its durability if properly designed and built and when adequate assessment and monitoring has been applied. The objective of the Action is to increase the acceptance of timber in the de- sign of new structures and in the repair of old buildings by developing and disseminating methods to assess, reinforce and monitor them. The need for assessment, reinforcement and monitoring of timber structures can arise from multiple motivations such as the expiration of the planned lifetime, materials aging, exceptional inci- dents, and ever more important, a change of use. The Action will benefit from multidisciplinary views of the problems and followed innovative solutions by the involved stakeholders, enable synergies between them and provide an effective way of discussing and disseminating the results from ongoing projects within this research area to the European industry. The Action will increase the confidence of designers, authorities and end-users in the safe, durable and efficient use of timber and consequently increase its use in construction. The scientific programme is divided into three main scientific areas expressed as Work Groups (WG) with the same aims but different perspectives: WG 1: Assessment of Timber Structures • Increasing knowledge and experience in non- and semi-destructive techniques and combinations thereof to improve applicability of results to asses the remaining structural capacity; • Compiling methods which deliver reliable and robust results that can subsequently be incorporated into analytical and probabilistic structural models; • Promoting the cross-validation of data obtained during inspection using similar methods in different projects; • Combining visual grading, vibrational methods and mechanical tests, for the decay characterisation and the mechanical characterisation of the material; • Developing specific in-situ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timber Bridge History Booklet for Web.Qxp
    Printed on Member & recycled Supporter paper TimberTimber TrestleTrestle BridgesBridges inin Alaska Railroad Corporation P.O. Box 107500 • Anchorage, Alaska 99510-7500 (907) 265-2300 • Reservations • (907) 265-2494 AlaskaAlaska RailroadRailroad TTY/TDD • (907) 265-2620 www.AlaskaRailroad.com This History booklet is History also available online by visiting AlaskaRailroad.com Publication Table of Contents “The key to unlocking Alaska is a system of railroads.” — President Woodrow Wilson (1914) The Alaska Railroad at a Glance . 3 Alaska Railroad Historical Overview. 5 Early Development & Operations. 5 Revitalization & World War II . 6 Rehabilitation & Early Cold War . 7 Recent History . 7 About Timber Trestle Bridges . 8 History of Timber Trestle Bridges . 10 in the United States History of Timber Trestle Bridges . 13 on the Alaska Railroad Bridge under constructon at MP 54. (ARRC photo archive) Status of Timber Trestle Bridges . 18 on the Alaska Railroad Historical Significance of Alaska . … progress was immediately hindered 20 Railroad Timber Trestle Bridges by numerous water crossings and abundant muskeg. Representative ARR Timber Bridges . 20 Because a trestle was the easiest and cheapest way to negotiate these barriers, a great many of them were erected, Publication Credits . 22 only to be later replaced or Research Acknowledgements . 22 filled and then forgotten. — Alaska Engineering Commission (1915) Bibliography of References . 22 Cover photo: A train leaves Anchorage, crossing Ship Creek Bridge in 1922. (ARRC photo archive) 01 The Alaska Railroad at a Glance early a century ago, President Woodrow Wilson charged the Alaskan Engineering Commission with building a railroad connecting a southern ice-free harbor to the territory’s interior in order to open this vast area to commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Bridges in South America
    Timber Bridges in South America Carlito Calil Junior, Laboratory of Wood and Timber Structures, Sao Paulo University, Brazil Abstract Beam Superstructures Timber bridges in South America predate the 19th Longitudinal beams superstructures are the simplest century. This paper provides an introduction of the and most common timber bridge type and consist of a many types of timber bridges currently used in South deck system supported by a series of timber beams America. The five basic types used, which are, the between two or more supports. Bridge beams are longitudinal beam, frame, truss, arch and suspension constructed from logs and sawn lumber, single or superstructures, are presented. Research on new bridge composite elements. designs, using tropical and reforestation wood species, has been developed in the Laboratory of Wood and Log Beams Timber Structures, Sao Paulo University in Brazil, on The simplest type of timber bridge in South America is prestressed timber bridge and decks composed with the log beam. It is constructed by placing round logs two diagonal layers of sawn wood connected with alternately tip and butt sections. The span of log beam wood dowels over composed longitudinal beams. We is limited to sizes and truck loads. The clear span of 5 will construct the first prestressed timber bridge in to 12 meters are most common (Figure 1). South America in this year using Eucalyptus Citriodora specie. In order to support high truck loads, LaMEM developed a longitudinal beam with composite Keywords: timber, briges, South America, Brazil configuration of two logs alternately tip and butt sections and connected with split rings and bolts Introduction (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Bridges: a Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Architectural Studies Integrative Projects Art History and Architectural Studies 2015 A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj Recommended Citation Chase, Cody, "A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture" (2015). Architectural Studies Integrative Projects. Paper 73. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art History and Architectural Studies at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architectural Studies Integrative Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. CODY CHASE SENIOR INTEGRATIVE PROJECT: INDEPENDENT STUDY ARCHITECTURAL STUDIES CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2015 A"LOOK"INTO"BRIDGES" A"Study"of"Types,"Histories,"and"the"Marriage"of" Engineering"and"Architecture" " Cody"Chase"‘15" Architectural"Studies"Major,"Art"History"Minor" Senior"IntegraHve"Project" " Why Bridges? Where to begin? TYPES OTHER • Arch • Glossary • Beam/Girder/Stringer • Materials • Truss • History of Failures • Suspension • Models • Cable-Stayed • Moveable Span What makes a bridge stand up? FORCES ***Compression:
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges of Somerset County Pennsylvania
    HISTORIC BRIDGES OF SOMERSET COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Scott D. Heberling Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration HISTORIC BRIDGES OF SOMERSET COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Scott D. Heberling Photographs by Scott D. Heberling and Stephen Simpson except as noted Layout and design by Christopher Yohn This publication was produced by Heberling Associates, Inc. for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration © 2010 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ISBN-10: 0-89271-126-4 ISBN-13: 978-0-89271-126-0 CONTENTS 1 Somerset County’s Historic Bridges 3 Bridge Building in Pennsylvania 6 Stone Arch Bridges 10 Wooden Covered Bridges 21 Metal Truss Bridges 35 Concrete Bridges 43 Bridge Location Map 44 Sources Glessner Bridge Salisbury Viaduct Somerset County’s Historic Bridges Somerset County, high in the Laurel Highlands of southwestern Pennsylvania, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty and expansive rural landscapes. It is also rich in history. The county’s many historic farms, villages, and winding country roads contribute to a strong “sense of place” that appeals to residents and visitors alike. The people who have called Somerset County home for thousands of years have created a unique cultural environment unlike any other. From the ancient settlements in the “Turkeyfoot” region of the south, to the rolling farm country of Brothers Valley in the center, to the coal patch towns of the north, history is everywhere in Somerset County. Something interesting always seems to lie just around the next bend in the road. The county’s development was shaped by its hydrology and rugged topography. Although its forested hills hid immeasurable mineral wealth just below the surface they also limited the areas suitable for settlement and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Kintersburg Bridge, PA-32-05
    THE THEODORE BURR COVERED BRIDGE SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. VOLUME 40 - NUMBER 1 WINTER 2017 Kintersburg Bridge, PA-32-05 J. S. Fleming built this bridge across Crooked Creek in 1877 at a cost of $893. The 68 ft., single span crossing is one of only five Howe Truss covered bridges in the Commonwealth. It was named for Isaac Kinter, a local shopkeeper. Bypassed many years ago by a modern bridge, it is located off Tanoma Road on Musser Road in Rayne Township. One of four remaining covered bridges in Indiana County, PA, all are easily visited in one afternoon tour. - Photo by Thomas E. Walczak, September 25, 2016 - 1 - WOODEN COVERED SPANS VOLUME 40 - NUMBER 1, WINTER 2017 THE THEODORE BURR COVERED BRIDGE SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. The material herein shall not be reproduced without prior written permission from this society. Editor Thomas E. Walczak 3012 Old Pittsburgh Road New Castle, PA 16101 The Old Covered Bridge Email: [email protected] By Charles Clevenger OFFICERS 2016-2017 New Boston, Ohio President .........................................................Thomas E. Walczak 3012 Old Pittsburgh Road A dusty dirt road meanders the ridge, New Castle, PA 16101 Then curves downhill 1st Vice-President ...................................................James Smedley To an old covered bridge. 4 Gamewell Garth Where I, in my youth, Nottingham, MD 21236 Spent hours at play; 2nd Vice-President ..................................................Ray Finkelstein Oh, I remember—‘tho it were yesterday. 4720 Horseshoe Trail Macungie, PA 180625 There, hearts of love, I carved on its beams, 3rd Vice-President ................................................... Steve Wolfhope 706 Jonathan Drive ‘Twas only yesterday- or so it seems.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Types in NSW Historical Overviews 2006
    Bridge Types in NSW Historical overviews 2006 These historical overviews of bridge types in NSW are extracts compiled from bridge population studies commissioned by RTA Environment Branch. CONTENTS Section Page 1. Masonry Bridges 1 2. Timber Beam Bridges 12 3. Timber Truss Bridges 25 4. Pre-1930 Metal Bridges 57 5. Concrete Beam Bridges 75 6. Concrete Slab and Arch Bridges 101 Masonry Bridges Heritage Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW 2005 1 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO MASONRY BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 History of early bridges constructed in NSW Bridges constructed prior to the 1830s were relatively simple forms. The majority of these were timber structures, with the occasional use of stone piers. The first bridge constructed in NSW was built in 1788. The bridge was a simple timber bridge constructed over the Tank Stream, near what is today the intersection of George and Bridge Streets in the Central Business District of Sydney. Soon after it was washed away and needed to be replaced. The first "permanent" bridge in NSW was this bridge's successor. This was a masonry and timber arch bridge with a span of 24 feet erected in 1803 (Figure 1.1). However this was not a triumph of colonial bridge engineering, as it collapsed after only three years' service. It took a further five years for the bridge to be rebuilt in an improved form. The contractor who undertook this work received payment of 660 gallons of spirits, this being an alternative currency in the Colony at the time (Main Roads, 1950: 37) Figure 1.1 “View of Sydney from The Rocks, 1803”, by John Lancashire (Dixson Galleries, SLNSW).
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Stayed Timber Bridges
    D)l D CTTO Anna Pousette Cable Stayed Timber Bridges Trätek INSTITUTET FÖR TRÄTEKNISK FORSKNI AnnaPousette CABLE STAYED TIMBER BRIDGES Trätek, Rapport 10112042 ISSN 1102-1071 ISRN TRÄTEK - R — 01/042 — SE Nyckelord dimensional analysis timber bridges Stockholm december 2001 Rapporter från Trätek - Institutet för träteknisk forsk• Trätek - Institutet för träteknisk forskning - betjänar ning-är kompletta sammanställningar av forsknings• sågverk, trämanufaktur (snickeri-, frähus-, möbel- och resultat eller översikter, utvecklingar och studier Pu• övrig träförädlande indusfri), skivtillverkare och bygg• blicerade rapporter betecknas med I eller P och num• industri. reras tillsammans med alla utgåvor från Trätek i lö• Institutet är ett icke vinstdrivande bolag med indust• pande följd. riella och institutionella kunder FoU-projekt genom• Citat tillätes om källan anges. förs både som konfidentiella uppdrag för enskilda företagskunder och som gemensamma projekt för grupper av företag eller för den gemensamma bran• schen. Arbetet utförs med egna, samverkande och ex• terna resurser Trätek har forskningsenheter i Stock• holm, Växjö och Skellefteå. Reports issued by the Swedish Institute for Wood The Swedish Institute for Wood Technology Research Technology Research comprise complete accounts serves sawmills, manufacturing (joinery, wooden for research results, or summaries, surveys and houses, furniture and other woodworking plants), studies. Published reports bear the designation I board manufacturers and building industry. or P and are numbered in consecutive order The institute is a non-profit company with industrial together with all the other publications from the and institutional customers. R&D projekcts are Institute. performed as contract work for individual indust• Extracts from the text may be reproduced provided rial customers as well as joint ventures on an the source is acknowledges.
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
    Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Wooden Bridges Through the Ages – a Review of Selected Examples of Heritage Objects. Part 1 – the Milestones
    TECHNICAL TRANSACTIONS CZASOPISMO TECHNICZNE CIVIL ENGINEERING BUDOWNICTWO 2-B/2016 DOI: 10.4467/2353737XCT.16.161.5772 DONCHO PARTOV*, MARIUSZ MAŚLAK**, RADAN IVANOV*, MILEN PETKOV*, DENISLAV SERGEEV*, ANTOANETA DIMITROVA* THE DEVELOPMENT OF WOODEN BRIDGES THROUGH THE AGES – A REVIEW OF SELECTED EXAMPLES OF HERITAGE OBJECTS. PART 1 – THE MILESTONES ROZWÓJ MOSTÓW DREWNIANYCH POPRZEZ WIEKI – PRZEGLĄD NA WYBRANYCH PRZYKŁADACH OBIEKTÓW DZIEDZICTWA KULTUROWEGO. CZĘŚĆ 1 – KAMIENIE MILOWE A b s t r a c t In this article, selected examples of heritage wooden bridges, which were built over the centuries in various parts of the world, are presented and briefly discussed. The overview allows the observation of not only the continuous progress in the techniques used to construct bridges of this type but also the variety of the design solutions applied. Keywords: wooden bridge, cultural heritage, historical testimonies, old design solutions Streszczenie W artykule zaprezentowano i krótko omówiono wybrane przykłady realizacji mostów drew- nianych, stanowiących obiekty dziedzictwa kulturowego i budowanych w różnych rejo- nach świata na przestrzeni wieków. Zamieszczony przegląd obrazuje nie tylko ciągły postęp w technikach wznoszenia tego typu mostów, ale również różnorodność zastosowanych roz- wiązań konstrukcyjnych. Słowa kluczowe: most drewniany, dziedzictwo kulturowe, świadectwa historyczne, dawne rozwiązania konstrukcyjne * Prof. Ph.D. Doncho Partov, Assoc. Prof. Ph.D. Radan Ivanov, Assist. Prof. Milen Petkov, D.Sc. Civ. Eng. Denislav Sergeev, Assist. Prof. Antoaneta Dimitrova, University of Structural Engineering and Architecture (VSU) “Lyuben Karavelov”, Sofia, Bulgaria. ** Ph.D. D.Sc. Mariusz Maślak, prof. CUT, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland. 94 1. Introduction Wood, in addition to stone, was probably one of the first building materials intentionally used by man to construct bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
    Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Bridge Program Budget Is Just Over $40 Million
    Bridge Program Project Scope Need, Purpose and Benefits The Alaska Railroad (ARRC) 500-plus miles The ARRC Bridge Program focuses on infra- of mainline and branch track includes 178 bridges structure integrity that underpins safe, reliable rail- and large culverts (10 or more feet in diameter) road transportation services. The Alaska Railroad that cross barriers ranging from streams to gulches. operates over the oldest transportation infra- Railroad bridges may be constructed from steel, structure in the state. Many rail system bridges concrete, wood or a combination of materials, with were constructed decades ago. The ARRC Bridge different span types included in a single bridge. Program pursues heavy maintenance, rehabilitation The ARRC Bridge Program identifies structures and replacement to maintain bridges in a state of requiring upgrade, overhaul or replacement. In good repair. pursuit of this program, ARRC’s current 5-year plan Program activities will address operational calls for 13 bridges to be replaced or rehabilitated efficiency. ARRC is forced to slow train speeds due by internal and contract workers. In addition to to bridge age and deterioration. ARRC must also these large projects, ARRC’s bridge crews accom- perform more preventive maintenance and repairs plish annual repair, rehabilitation and reconstruction in order to keep older bridges in safe and service- activities to ensure bridge structures continue to able condition. safely support ARRC operations. Existing rail bridge limitations also render the Some of the existing railroad bridges have Alaska Railroad’s freight business more costly to op- been identified as eligible, or potentially eligible, erate. ARRC must consistently limit loads on railcars for the National Register of Historical Places, either individually or as contributing elements to a poten- tial historic district.
    [Show full text]