DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Industry Value Chain 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Industry Value Chain 2018 December | 2018 A PUBLICATION OF UXC.COM Nuclear Industry Value Chain 1501 MACY DRIVE ROSWELL, GA 30076 PH +1 770 642-7745 FX +1 770 643-2954 – NOTICE – UxC, LLC (“UxC”) shall have title to, ownership of, and all proprietary rights in this Report. Under United States federal copyright law (17 USC 101 et seq.) it is illegal to reproduce this Report by any means without written permission from UxC. The information contained in this Report is obtained from sources that UxC believes to be reliable. UxC makes no war- ranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this Report and UxC, to the maximum extent permitted by law, assumes no liability for the use or effects of any of the information or data contained in this Report. It is UxC’s strict policy not to endorse, promote, or recommend any particular securities, currencies, or other financial products or instruments. Nothing contained in this Report is intended to constitute investment, legal, tax, accounting or other professional advice and the reader should not rely on the information provided in this Report for making financial decisions. ® The Ux U3O8 Price and other Ux Price indicators are developed by UxC and are proprietary and exclusive intellectual property of UxC. These price indicators are provided to UxC’s customers through the Ux Weekly® publication and are made available on UxC’s public website solely at UxC’s discretion. They may not be reproduced or otherwise used without UxC’s express permission. ® ® ® ® ® ® UxC , Ux Weekly , Ux U3O8 Price , Ux , U-PRICE , and SWU-PRICE are trademarks of UxC, LLC. Nuclear Industry Value Chain - Dec 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction & Overview ____________________________________________________________________ 14 Purpose of Report ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Key Questions in the Nuclear Markets Today ............................................................................................................ 15 What’s New in the 2018 Report? ............................................................................................................................... 16 Structure of Report ..................................................................................................................................................... 17 Part I – Nuclear Power in the World Today _____________________________________________________ 19 Brief History of Nuclear Power ................................................................................................................................... 19 Nuclear Power’s Share of Global Energy................................................................................................................... 23 • Energy Demand and Supply ............................................................................................................................ 23 • Electricity Sector Outlook ................................................................................................................................. 24 • Analysis............................................................................................................................................................ 28 Current State of Nuclear Power ................................................................................................................................. 29 Why Nuclear Energy? ................................................................................................................................................ 30 • Challenges to Nuclear Energy ......................................................................................................................... 30 Major Trends in Nuclear Power .................................................................................................................................. 31 • Influence of Governments ................................................................................................................................ 31 • Need for More Electricity.................................................................................................................................. 32 • High Capital Costs ........................................................................................................................................... 32 • Reactor Shutdowns: Electricity Prices and Oversupply ................................................................................... 33 • Life Extensions Instead of New Construction .................................................................................................. 33 Profiles of Leading Nuclear Power Countries ............................................................................................................ 33 • United States ................................................................................................................................................... 34 • France .............................................................................................................................................................. 36 • Japan ............................................................................................................................................................... 38 • Russia .............................................................................................................................................................. 40 • China................................................................................................................................................................ 42 • South Korea ..................................................................................................................................................... 43 • India ................................................................................................................................................................. 44 Nuclear Reactor Technologies ................................................................................................................................... 47 • Basic Reactor Designs..................................................................................................................................... 47 • Evolution of Reactor Technologies .................................................................................................................. 51 • Generation III and III+ Reactors ....................................................................................................................... 52 • Current Reactor Offerings ................................................................................................................................ 53 • UxC Expertise in Reactor Technology Analysis............................................................................................... 55 UxC Forecasts for Nuclear Power.............................................................................................................................. 56 • UxC Base Case Nuclear Power Forecast ........................................................................................................ 57 • Alternative UxC Reactor Forecasts.................................................................................................................. 59 Third Party Forecasts for Nuclear Power ................................................................................................................... 60 • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) .................................................................................................... 60 • U.S. Energy Information Administration ........................................................................................................... 61 • BP Energy Outlook .......................................................................................................................................... 62 Part II – Front-End Market Overview __________________________________________________________ 63 Front-End Market Size Overview ............................................................................................................................... 64 Current and Future Market Trends ............................................................................................................................. 65 • Future Demand Uncertainty ............................................................................................................................. 65 • Accelerating Supply Responses ...................................................................................................................... 65 • Shifting Nature of China’s Approach to Fuel Supply ........................................................................................ 66 • Continued Prominence of Inventories and Secondary Supplies ...................................................................... 66 • Maturing Nature of the Mid-Term Market ......................................................................................................... 66 • Utility Focus on Fuel Cycle Cost Optimization ................................................................................................. 66 1 – Uranium Mining and Milling ______________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Power As a System Good: Organizational Models for Production Along the Value-Added Chain
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wealer, Ben; von Hirschhausen, Christian R. Working Paper Nuclear power as a system good: Organizational models for production along the value-added chain DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1883 Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: Wealer, Ben; von Hirschhausen, Christian R. (2020) : Nuclear power as a system good: Organizational models for production along the value-added chain, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1883, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/222865 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open
    [Show full text]
  • At Work 2021 Edition Foreword
    At Work 2021 edition Foreword 2020 is a year unlikely to be forgotten anytime soon, for published a white paper, The need for large and small a number of reasons. All of us have been impacted by nuclear, today and tomorrow, describing how both large- the pandemic in one way or another, and we have been scale nuclear power plants and small modular reactors forced to reassess our priorities. The ongoing crisis can play a significant role in the clean energy transition. showcased just how important affordable and reliable Towards the end of 2020, the Association also began electricity is, both hallmarks of the nuclear industry. As we its preparation for COP26 in earnest, meeting with UK look ahead at the challenges of the post-COVID economic government ministers to reinforce the importance of recovery, of achieving greater climate ambitions at COP26 nuclear energy in any deep decarbonization efforts. and reaching the Sustainable Development Goals, nuclear energy is perhaps more important than ever before. The World Nuclear University became virtual in 2020 to Association will continue to devote every effort towards continue its mission to train the future leaders of the ensuring that the industry’s voice is heard loud and clear. nuclear industry. Two World Nuclear Industry Today courses were hosted, one in China and one in Brazil, The pandemic recovery has inevitably been an important with over 1400 participants. Furthermore, three Extended aspect of the Association’s work for the past year. We Leadership Development workshops were hosted, joined forces with the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency attracting more than 350 participants.
    [Show full text]
  • At Work 2017 Edition
    At Work 2017 edition Foreword Year in review In 2016 the global nuclear industry The World Nuclear Association works future industry leaders. The 2016 continued the steady progress recorded towards this priority through the Summer Institute was held in Canada in 2015, with ten new units (totalling Harmony programme. This has entered and the University also organised four 9579 MWe) connected to the grid. a new stage with the establishment short courses in Malaysia, South Korea, Five of these new connections were of three work areas: achieving a level China and Romania. in China with one each in Russia, playing field in global electricity markets, Pakistan, India, South Korea and the harmonizing international regulatory In terms of new initiatives, our firstWorld USA. The dominance of Asian countries processes, and developing a more Nuclear Performance Report made an and especially China in new nuclear effective safety paradigm. important impact. This report series construction evidently remains an targeted at industry and international important trend. The Harmony programme is integrated organizations provides an up-to-date with our existing industry cooperation, factual picture of the nuclear power For the second year running, the nuclear information and communication sector today. We also launched the industry was on the right path for activities – all of which saw steady Nuclear Footprints advocacy campaign, achieving the Harmony goal of 1000 improvement in 2016. A special mention a collection of five short animations GWe of new nuclear added to reach goes to the Regional Workshops led by which describe nuclear energy in terms 25% of global electricity by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Catalog
    ATOMEX-Europe Prague, Czech Republic, October 25 - 26, 2011 Official Catalog Participants Participants Contents DEKRA Industrial AB . 20 The State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM . 8 Dunamenti Fire Protection Co . 20 AF-Consult Czech Republic s .r .o . 8 EGP INVEST, Ltd . 21 «All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Nuclear Power Plant Operation» Elektro Kroměříž a .s . 21 (VNIIAES, LTD) . 8 Enersense International Oy . 22 All for Power Journal . 9 European Nuclear Society . 22 «ALSTOM Atomenergomash», LLC . 9 ENVINET a .s . 22 ALTA, a .s . 9 EPLAN ENGINEERING CZ, s .r .o . 23 AMT Group . 10 Europe Today – Europe-Today .Ru . 24 Arako s .r .o . 11 EXCEL CSEPEL MACHINE TOOLS LTD . 24 ARMATURY Group a .s . 11 FANS, a .s . 25 ATB RIVA CALZONI SPA . 12 FCRB . 25 OJSC Atomenergomash . 12 FNK Group of Companies . 26 Atomenergomontage Ltd . 12 Fortum Power and Heat Oy . 26 Joint-Stock Company Nizhny Novgorod Engineering Company GEA EGI Contracting/Engineering Co . Ltd . 27 «ATOMENERGOPROEKT» (JSC NIAEP) . 13 GETINGE LA CALHENE . 27 Joint Stock Company «Saint Petersburg Research and Design Institute GLENTOR s .r .o . 27 «ATOMENERGOPROEKT» (JSC «SPAEP») . 14 JINPO PLUS a .s . 28 ATOMSTROYEXPORT JSC . 14 JSC OKB «GIDROPRESS» . 28 Armaturka Krnov, a .s . 15 GKN – STROMAG . 29 JSC Atomenergoproekt . 15 HOCHTIEF CZ a .s . 29 ATOMEX GROUP . 16 Hungarian Power Companies Ltd . 29 AUMA Servopohony spol . s r . o . 17 I .B .C . Praha spol . s r .o . 30 BESTTECHNICA TM-Radomir PAD . 17 «Institute «Orgenergostroy» . 30 Burns and Roe Enterprises, Inc . 18 Invensys Operations Management . 31 CZECH NUCLEAR FORUM . 18 “ISCOM” Ltd .
    [Show full text]
  • List of Congress Delegates
    List of Congress Delegates № Company Name Surname Position 1 AB "RUSSIA" Pavel Petrovskiy Vice President, Director of corporate business Department 2 AB "RUSSIA" Alexey Vinogradov Head of corporate business corporate business Department 3 Acceleration Management Solutions Angelo Codignoni President 4 Acceleration Management Solutions Morel Jean-Pierre Consultant 5 Acceleration management Solutions Mauro Sipsz Director "Adult Education and Working Life Services 6 Ilya Ouretski Salpaus Further Education" 7 AEM-technology Eugeniy Pakermanov Director General 8 Aeroflot Igor Kozhurov Department of internal control, Director 9 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Sergey Dushev Deputy Chief Designer of Fuel Handling Equipment 10 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Sergey Fateev Lead Engineer 11 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Nadezhda Knyazeva Engineer 12 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Feliks Lisitsa Director Consultant "Chief Auditor - the chief of service 13 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Lyudmila Manuilova internal control and audit" 14 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Evgeniy Naumov Deputy Director for HR Management and Social Issues 15 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Sergey Salnikov Head of International Relations and Foreign Economic Activity Department 16 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Igor Shmelev Head of Strategic Development and Foreign Economic Activity Division 17 Akdeniz University Muzaffer Karasulu Professor 18 Akkuyu NPP Tahir Agaev PR/GR manager 19 Akkuyu NPP Fuad Ahundov Director General
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power As a System Good Organizational Models for Production Along the Value-Added Chain
    1883 Discussion Papers Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung 2020 Nuclear Power as a System Good Organizational Models for Production along the Value-Added Chain Ben Wealer and Christian von Hirschhausen Opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect views of the institute. IMPRESSUM © DIW Berlin, 2020 DIW Berlin German Institute for Economic Research Mohrenstr. 58 10117 Berlin Tel. +49 (30) 897 89-0 Fax +49 (30) 897 89-200 http://www.diw.de ISSN electronic edition 1619-4535 Papers can be downloaded free of charge from the DIW Berlin website: http://www.diw.de/discussionpapers Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin are indexed in RePEc and SSRN: http://ideas.repec.org/s/diw/diwwpp.html http://www.ssrn.com/link/DIW-Berlin-German-Inst-Econ-Res.html Nuclear Power as a System Good Organizational Models for Production Along the Value- Added Chain Ben Wealera,b* and Christian von Hirschhausena,b a Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy (WIP), Berlin Institute of Technology, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany b German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany *corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Due to its technical complexity, the co-production of electricity generation and nuclear weapons, and its high fixed costs, nuclear power is a particularly complex commodity, which poses unusual challenges for state economic (or industrial, defense, innovation etc.) policy. As in other sectors, the question arises here, too, of an adequate division of private and public responsibilities, in other words "competition and planning", taking into account knowledge aspects, incentive structures, transaction costs and a fair distribution of revenues and burdens.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope of Budget Consolidation of ROSATOM in 2016 1 FSUE M.V
    Scope of budget consolidation of ROSATOM in 2016 FSUE M.V. Protsenko Federal Research and 1 Development Centre Start Production Association FSUE N.L. Dukhov All-Russia Research Institute 2 of Automatics 3 FSUE Elektrokhimpribor Integrated Plant 4 FSUE Instrumentation Factory 5 FSUE Mayak Production Association FSUE Russian Federal Nuclear Centre – E. I. Zababakhin All-Russian Research Institute of 6 Technical Physics FSUE Russian Federal Nuclear Centre – All- Russian Scientific Research Institute of 7 Experimental Physics (FSUE RFNC VNIIEF) 8 FSUE Ural Electromechanical Plant 9 FSUE Production Association Sever FSUE A.P. Alexandrov Research Institute of 10 Technology FSUE Federal Research and Production Centre Yu.E. Sedakov Research Institute of Measuring 11 Systems 12 JSC FCS&HT SNPO Eleron Federal State Unitary Enterprise of the Nuclear- 13 Powered Fleet (FSUE Atomflot) FSUE Situation and Crisis Centre of the Federal 14 Atomic Energy Agency FSUE Emergency Response Centre of Rosatom 15 (Saint Petersburg) 16 JSC Obespechenie RFNC VNIIEF 17 JSC Expedition No. 2 18 FSUE Bazalt FSUE Research, Development and Certification 19 Centre for Comprehensive Data Protection 20 JSC Red Star JSC N.A. Dollezhal Research and Development 21 Institute of Power Engineering 22 JSC Sarov Generating Company 23 JSC Atomspetstrans 24 JSC Sarov Heating Network Company 25 JSC Dedal Research and Production Complex JSC D.V. Efremov Institute of Electrophysical 26 Apparatus FSUE V.I. Lenin All-Russian Electrotechnical 27 Institute FSUE Experimental Plant of V.I. Lenin All-Russian 28 Electrotechnical Institute 29 JSC ARMZ Uranium Holding (Atomredmetzoloto) 30 JSC Khiagda 31 JSC Dalur PJSC Priargunsky Industrial Mining and Chemical 32 Union 33 ARMZ Service LLC 34 JSC Elkon Mining and Metallurgical Plant 35 JSC Elkon MMP Project 36 JSC RUSBURMASH 37 JSC VNIPIpromtekhnologii 38 JSC Uranium One Group 39 Uranium One Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom Engineering Division Be Digital
    STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM ENGINEERING DIVISION Be Digital Annual Report '17 Table of Contents CHAPTER 2. КEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS 55 2.1. Financial Capital 56 2.1.1. Financial Results 57 2.1.2. Financial Capital Management 58 Nowadays, maintaining 2.2. Manufactured Capital 62 2.2.1. Nuclear Power Plant Design and Construction as the Engineering Division’s Business Core 62 the leadership depends 2.2.2. Manufactured Capital Management 76 Information on The Report 4 2.2.3. The Rosatom Production System in the Engineering Division 78 largely on the company’s 2.2.4. Procurement Operations 80 About the Engineering Division 5 integration into the 2.3. Intellectual Capital 81 Financial and Operational Highlights 2017 7 2.3.1. Patenting of Intellectual Products 82 emerging digital economy. Key Milestones of 2017 10 2.3.2. Innovation Projects Launched in 2017 82 2.3.3. Information Technologies Implementation Projects 83 CEO Statement 14 Our Engineering Division 2.3.4. Multi-D Technology 84 is making good progress 2.4. Human Capital. Personnel Training due CHAPTER 1. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW 15 to Digital Transition Demand 85 while keeping this track. 2.4.1. Personnel’s Policy 86 1.1. Strategy of The Engineering Division And KPI of Its 2.4.2. Personnel’s Characteristics 86 Implementation 18 2.4.3. Personnel Policy Execution 88 1.1.1. The Engineering Division’s Contribution to Rosatom State Corporation 2.4.4. Social Policy Execution 92 Strategy Implementation 18 2.4.5. Labour Protection 93 1.1.2. External Environment Strategic Analysis 21 1.1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • At Work 2020 Edition
    At Work 2020 edition Foreword The upcoming decade will be crucial for the energy sector Overall, during this first phase of the Harmony goal and the nuclear industry particularly, as we attempt to achieve (2016-2020), 43 reactors are expected to start in 10 decarbonization globally. Nuclear power's role in the clean countries, based on 20 different designs, and with energy transition must be agreed universally this year, to capacities ranging from 35 MWe to 1750 MWe – a ensure that the full potential of nuclear energy can be realized. reflection of the dynamic nature of our industry and our strong commitment to innovation. This brings us close 2019 has shown that the need for nuclear energy is to meeting the first milestone of the Harmony goal, to increasingly recognized globally. A broad range of expert construct an average of 10 GWe per year of new nuclear bodies have highlighted how nuclear energy is vital to capacity between 2016 and 2020. However, a greater ensure that electricity is available to all, while respecting effort is needed to build on this good start and accelerate the environment and tackling climate change. towards the goal of supplying 25% of the world’s electricity before 2050. For the first time in 18 years, the International Energy Agency published a report on nuclear energy – Nuclear The world’s nuclear reactors continued to perform Power in a Clean Energy Future. It concluded that removing excellently, with several utilities already reporting record nuclear energy from the equation would result in higher output. Five reactors, in India, Switzerland and the electricity prices and the transition to a clean energy USA, reached the milestone of 50 years of operation, system becoming drastically harder and more costly.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomexpo 2012 International Forum
    ATOMEXPO 2012 INTERNATIONAL FORUM NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY WORLDWIDE: ONE YEAR AFTER FUKUSHIMA Moscow • Gostiny Dvor • 4 - 6 June 2012 CONGRESS PROGRAM JUNE 4, Monday – Round table sessions, Special WANO event JUNE 5, Tuesday - Plenary Session, Round table sessions, Symposium JUNE 6, Wednesday – Round table sessions, Youth Session PLENARY SESSION PROGRAM 5 JUNE 2012 Topic: Nuclear Power Industry Worldwide: One Year after Fukushima 10:30 – 12:30 PLENARY SESSION Conference hall Russia 24 Broadcasting Channel (live) №1 Moderator of the Panel Discussion: Sergey Brilev, Presenter, Russia TV Channel Participants: Leonid Bolshov, Director, IBRAE RAN; Takuya Hattori, President, Japan Atomic Industry Forum; Lawrie Haynes, President – Nuclear, Rolls-Royce; Metin Kilci, Undersecretary, Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Turkey; Ruben Lazo, Chief Commercial Officer, AREVA; Alexander Lokshin, First Deputy Director General, ROSATOM; Alexander Ozerets, Minister of Energy, Belarus; Dipuo Peters, Minister of Energy, Republic of South Africa; Matti Ruotsala, Executive Vice-President, Fortum; Ian Telfer, Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board, Uranium One. ROUND TABLE SESSIONS PROGRAM 4 JUNE 2012 10:00 – 18:00 Special WANO event: Conference hall «Nuclear Power Industry after Fukushima - №1 Operator's Perspective» More information on this topic at the exhibition: IBRAE RAN, NAK Kazatomprom, EDF Moderator: Vladimir Asmolov, President of WANO, First Deputy Director General, Rosenergoatom. 1 Vladimir Asmolov, President of WANO, First Deputy Director General, Rosenergoatom. Introductory Remarks; Takuya Hattori, President of the Japan Atomic Industry Forum. Lessons Learned from Fukushima Accident; Shinichi Kawamura, Plant Manager, Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Plant. Lessons Learned from Fukushima Daini NPP and the Status of Fukushima Daiichi NPP; Laurent Stricker, Chairman, WANO.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Nuclear Energy Enterprise
    Exhibit 10 1 of 38 The U.S. Nuclear Energy Enterprise: A Key National Security Enabler A Special Report by the Energy Futures Initiative Exhibit 10 2 of 38 The U.S. Nuclear Energy Enterprise: A Key National Security Enabler A Special Report from Energy Futures Initiative, Inc. August 2017 1 Exhibit 10 3 of 38 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Report Summary ............................................................................................................................. 6 Full Report .................................................................................................................................... 12 U.S. Nuclear Energy Policy Framework and National Security Issues ................................. 12 Nuclear Fuel Cycle Development and Nuclear Nonproliferation ...................................... 15 Supporting the U.S. Nuclear Navy ...................................................................................... 15 Supporting the Global Strategic Stability and Deterrence Value of Nuclear Weapons .. 16 Global Nuclear Power Developments and Nonproliferation Considerations....................... 16 The U.S. Role in the Global Nuclear Energy Market: Growing Challenges ........................... 19 History of U.S. Leadership in Global Nuclear Nonproliferation ........................................ 19 Global Proliferation Concerns are Increasing ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Forum ATOMEXPO 2010 7-9 June 2010 Forum Program: Manezh Central • International Nuclear Energy Congress Exhibition Hall • International Exhibition
    International Forum ATOMEXPO 2010 7-9 June 2010 Forum Program: Manezh Central • International Nuclear Energy Congress Exhibition Hall • International Exhibition Exhibition sections: • NPP construction; • Tools and equipment for nuclear industry; • Engineering and project management in NPP • Decommissioning of nuclear facilities; construction; • Nuclear medicine. Isotopes; • Nuclear fuel cycle: uranium mining and enrich- • Information and communications technologies ment, materials for nuclear industry, nuclear fuel for nuclear industry; fabrication; • Nanotechnologies and nanomaterials for nuclear • Nuclear power plants, operations and safety; industry; • Small and medium-capacity nuclear power • Environmental protection; engineering; • Education and training for nuclear industry; ad- • Nuclear sciences, innovative projects; vanced professional training; • Nuclear machinery engineering; • Risk insurance for nuclear industry. • Power machinery engineering. Electrical equipment; LLC Atomexpo Varshavskoye Shosse 3, Moscow 117105, Russia Phone: +7 495 645-2327, Fax: +7 495 952 9949, [email protected] http://2010.atomexpo.ru Dear Participants of ATOMEXPO 2009! I would like to extend my sincere gratitude for the fruitful of the exchange of opinions has been reconfirmation work at the Forum! of the intentions of state authorities and key players of the global market to continue new NPP construction Your renown, professional standing and expertise and production capacity expansion programs, as well enabled a broad discussion of the most topical issues as investments in nuclear power engineering in new of nuclear energy worldwide development, allowed countries. generation of the principal signal transmitted from this venue - the nuclear renaissance perseveres beyond I sincerely hope to welcome you in Moscow again, and the crisis. This idea has been comprehensively reflect- I have a special pleasure to invite you to ATOMEXPO ed in the plenary session reports, while the main result Forum 2010 that will be held 7-9 June 2010.
    [Show full text]