DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2017 State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom Engineering Division Be Digital

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2017 State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom Engineering Division Be Digital STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM ENGINEERING DIVISION Be Digital Annual Report '17 Table of Contents CHAPTER 2. КEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS 55 2.1. Financial Capital 56 2.1.1. Financial Results 57 2.1.2. Financial Capital Management 58 Nowadays, maintaining 2.2. Manufactured Capital 62 2.2.1. Nuclear Power Plant Design and Construction as the Engineering Division’s Business Core 62 the leadership depends 2.2.2. Manufactured Capital Management 76 Information on The Report 4 2.2.3. The Rosatom Production System in the Engineering Division 78 largely on the company’s 2.2.4. Procurement Operations 80 About the Engineering Division 5 integration into the 2.3. Intellectual Capital 81 Financial and Operational Highlights 2017 7 2.3.1. Patenting of Intellectual Products 82 emerging digital economy. Key Milestones of 2017 10 2.3.2. Innovation Projects Launched in 2017 82 2.3.3. Information Technologies Implementation Projects 83 CEO Statement 14 Our Engineering Division 2.3.4. Multi-D Technology 84 is making good progress 2.4. Human Capital. Personnel Training due CHAPTER 1. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW 15 to Digital Transition Demand 85 while keeping this track. 2.4.1. Personnel’s Policy 86 1.1. Strategy of The Engineering Division And KPI of Its 2.4.2. Personnel’s Characteristics 86 Implementation 18 2.4.3. Personnel Policy Execution 88 1.1.1. The Engineering Division’s Contribution to Rosatom State Corporation 2.4.4. Social Policy Execution 92 Strategy Implementation 18 2.4.5. Labour Protection 93 1.1.2. External Environment Strategic Analysis 21 1.1.3. Sustainability Agenda 22 2.5. Natural Capital 96 V. I. Limarenko – CEO of Rosatom State 2.5.1. Natural Safety Management at the Stage of NPP Design 98 Corporation Engineering Division 1.2. Business Model 25 2.5.2. Natural Safety Management at the Stage of NPP Construction 101 1.3. International Footprint 28 2.5.3. Results in the Field of Natural Protection 103 1.3.1. NPP Construction and Operation's Market 28 2.6. Social And Relationship Capital 107 1.3.2. Diversification Markets 29 2.6.1. Awards in 2017 108 1.4. Digital Transformation 2.6.2. Main Communication Projects 108 of The Engineering Division 30 2.6.3. Contribution to the Development of Regions of Operation 109 1.4.1. Digital Transformation Program 30 2.6.4. Main Russian and International Agreements of 2017 112 1.4.2. Training and development in terms of digital transition demand 33 2.6.5. Engagement with Stakeholders 114 1.5. Risks And Opportunities 34 Engagement with stakeholders 119 1.5.1. Risk Management 34 Conclusion of the Public Assuarance 1.5.2. Basic Risks and Opportunities 36 of the Report 123 1.5.3. Risk Management in 2017 37 Additional Information 125 1.6. Corporate Governance 40 Information on the Report 125 1.6.1. Corporate Management System of The Engineering Division 40 List of Abbreviations 127 1.6.2. Corporate Management System of JSC ASE EC 42 Glossary 127 1.6.3. Corporate Management System of JSC ASE 46 List of Appendices 129 1.6.4. Corporate Management System of JSC Atomenergoproekt 48 Feedback Questionnaire 130 1.6.5. Corporate Management System of JSC ATOMPROEKT 50 1.6.6. Control of Financial and Economic Performanceand Anti-Corruption Policy 52 STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM ENGINEERING DIVISION BE DIGITAL Information on the Report About the Engineering Division (GRI 102-1, 102-2, 102-3, 102-5) The annual public report for 2017 (hereinafter – the Report) of The Rosatom State Corporation Engineering Division includes four key organizations: JSC ASE EC (Nizhny Novgorod) – managing the Rosatom State Corporation Engineering Division (Engineering company, JSC ASE (Nizhny Novgorod), Atomenergoproekt (Moscow), JSC ATOMPROEKT (Saint Petersburg). Division, Division, Company) discloses financial and non-financial results of theperformance in the reporting year. The report is Our Mission issued in Russian and English. Our Vision (GRI 102–52) The integrated annual report is issued on an annual High-priority topics of the Report Our business involves the area of complex engineering We seek to establish a competitive business that is successful in basis. This is the third report for the Division and the tenth report construction project management based on the extensive record implementation of construction projects and complex engineering for JSC ASE EC. Following the results of 2017, the integrated – “Digital Transformation of the of nuclear project implementation, it creates a stakeholder value construction management projects and is focused on the report of the Division, a booklet (short report) of the Division Engineering Division” and “Training and ensures achievement of its objectives on the Russian and shareholder value maximization. according to the results of the year, reports of subsidiaries have international markets. been issued. and Professional Development of the High-priority topics of the Report were determined in the course Personnel under the Conditions of Digital Our Values of a dialogue on the determination of significant issues by Transformation”. JSC ASE EC management together with the key stakeholders’ Our values comply with these of the Safety • Responsibility for the result • Efficiency • representatives. ROSATOM and aim to execution the New items "Materials" and "Training" and "Education" were mission and maintain the sustainable One team • One step ahead • Respect included in material topics of the Report, while Procurement growth. (GRI 102-16) practices, Environmental Compliance and Supplier Environmental Assessment were excluded from the report. The report is prepared in compliance with GRI principles. Rosatom State Corporation Regulatory documents • Policy of Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation in the area Engineering Division’s Competitive Advantages Standards and Regulations of public accountability. The Report is developed according to the following regulatory • Public annual reporting model standard for Rosatom State • Representation of references on the Russian and foreign • Complex industrial technological Multi-D platform to ensure documents. Atomic Energy Corporation’s key organizations (in view of public markets. capital construction project management. accountability). • Available safe standard designs based on GenIII/III+ VVER • Management team and operation personnel’s extensive International standards and guidelines • Ethical code of the Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation. reactors with competitive advantages such as in terms of such expertise based on many years’ experience in NPP and other • АА1000 series standards (Institute of Social and Ethical parameters as LCOE, CAPEX and construction deadlines. complex engineering facilities construction. AccountAbility). Regulatory documents of the Engineering Division • Extensive network of management of NPPs and other complex • Own design capacities. • Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standads • Regulation on JSC ASE EC Stakeholders Commission. engineering facilities construction projects. • Outstanding engineering and technological infrastructure. (GRI SRS) (GRI SRS). • Regulation on JSC ASE EC Public Accountability Committee. • Integrated Reporting International Standard (International • Company standard STO 8841271.012–2016 “Procedure for <IR> Framework). elaboration of the Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation’s public annual report for the reporting period”. Membership in Associations (GRI 102-13) Regulatory and legal framework of the Russian Federation. • Federal Law No. 208-FZ dated. 26.12.1995 “On Joint Stock Level of Application of GRI Guideline • Federation of employers of atomic modernization, overhaul of nuclear • Association “Self-regulatory regional Companies”. industry, power engineering and science facilities “SOYUZATOMGEO”. industry federation of employers (GRI 102–54) of Russia”. • Self-regulatory organization NPO “Association of Nizhny Novgorod • Letter by the Bank of Russia No.06-52/2463 dd. 10.04.2014 developers” (since 2017). “On the corporate management code”. This report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI • Association of innovative design. “Association of organizations carrying Standards: Comprehensive option. out architectural design of nuclear For information about JSC ASE EC • Federal Law No. 5485-1-FZ dd. 21.07.1993 "On state secret". • European Utility Requirements. facilities “SOYUZATOMPROEKT”. organizational structure and operating assets GRI Content Index, table of compliance with Standard <IR> see • Federal Law No.98-FZ dd. 29.07.2004 "On Commercial Secret". • Self-regulatory organization of the companies within the management in Appendix 1 of the Book of Appendices. NPO “Association of organizations • National Association of engineers- • Federal Law No. 149-FZ dated 27.07.2006 “On information, scope of JSC ASE EC, see Appendices 6 conducting engineering survey during consultants in the construction field”. information technologies and information security”. For the Table of disclosure of public reporting indicators of the and 7 of the Book of appendices. Engineering Division and Rosatom State Corporation, see Appendix architectural design, construction, • Czech nuclear forum. • Federal Law No. 402-FZ of 06.12.2011 “On accounting”. 2 of the Book of Appendices. For the full information about the Report, including the process of the content determination thereof, see section “Additional information”/Information on the report. All appendices hereto are given in the Book of Appendices, see http://www.atomstroyexport.ru/invest/report/. 4 ANNUAL REPORT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Nuclear Security Policy
    Innovative approaches to peace and security from the Stanley Foundation POLICYANALYSISBRIEF THE STANLEY FOUNDATION | MAY 2015 Russia’s Nuclear Security Policy: Priorities and Potential Areas for Cooperation The crisis over Ukraine has led to a drastic reduction in regular official Russian-US contacts in most areas, including those where it is in the two countries’ mutual national security interests to work together. Bilateral cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security has been among the affected areas. The United States has suspended contacts with Russia in the framework of the G-8 and in the Russian-US Bilateral Presidential Commission’s Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Security Working Group. Implementation of the September 2013 agreement on Cooperation in Nuclear- and Energy- Related Scientific Research and Development (R&D Agreement), which Anton Khlopkov prioritizes joint efforts on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security, has also been put on hold, and exchanges between nuclear scientists of the two Author countries have been frozen. In turn, Russia has decided not to take part in Anton Khlopkov1 is director of the preparations for the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit. Moscow also notified Moscow-based Center for Energy and Washington that most of the joint nuclear security projects in Russia would Security Studies and editor in chief of the not be extended beyond December 31, 2014. journal Nuclear Club. He is a member of the Advisory Board under the Security This trend is a serious cause for concern, given that Russia and the United Council of the Russian Federation and States, which are depositaries of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of chairman of the Moscow Nonproliferation Nuclear Weapons (NPT), bear special responsibility for maintaining the Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No
    Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission - R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report - July 3, 2014 RSP-0299 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report July 3, Released for Brian Gihm 0 Victor Snell Jim Sarvinis Milan Ducic 2014 Use Victor Snell Date Rev. Status Prepared By Checked By Approved By Approved By Client - CNSC H346105-0000-00-124-0002, Rev. 0 Page i © Hatch 2015 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission - R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report - July 3, 2014 Executive Summary The objectives of this report are to perform a design survey of small modular reactors (SMRs) with near-term deployment potential, with a particular emphasis on identifying their innovative safety features, and to review the Canadian nuclear regulatory framework to assess whether the current and proposed regulatory documents adequately address SMR licensing challenges. SMRs are being designed to lower the initial financing cost of a nuclear power plant or to supply electricity in small grids (often in remote areas) which cannot accommodate large nuclear power plants (NPPs). The majority of the advanced SMR designs is based on pressurized water reactor (PWR) technology, while some non-PWR Generation IV technologies (e.g., gas-cooled reactor, lead-cooled reactor, sodium-cooled fast reactor, etc.) are also being pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • From Gen I to Gen III
    From Gen I to Gen III Gabriel Farkas Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Ilkovicova 3, 81219 Bratislava [email protected] 14. 9. 2010 1 Evolution of Nuclear Reactors Generation I - demonstration reactors Generation II - working in the present Generation III - under construction 14. 9. 2010 2 Generation IV - R&D 14. 9. 2010 3 Expected development in nuclear technologies Prolongation of lifetieme of existing nuclear reactors Construction of new reactors in frame of Gen. III and IV . Figure 1 Replacement staggered over a 30-year period (2020 - 2050) Rate of construction : 2,000 MW/year 70000 60000 Lifetime 50000 prolongation 40000 Generation IV 30000 Actual reactors 20000 Generation III+ 10000 0 197519801985199019952000200520102015202020252030203520402045205020552060 14. 9. 2010 Average plant life : 48 years 4 Nuclear in Europe (Nuclear ~ 32% of total EU electricity production) SE, 7.3% UK, 7.9% SP, 5.8% BE,4.8% CZ, 2.5% GE, 16.3% FI, 2.4% BU, 1.8% Other 12.4% SK, 1.7% HU, 1.4% LT, 1.1% FR, 45.5% SI, 0.6% NL, RO, 0.5% 0.4% Source PRIS 14. 9. 2010 5 Central & Eastern Europe - Nuclear Landscape Russia Lithuania Ukraine 6 VVER440 Poland 1 RBMK 1300 2 VVER440 8 VVER1000 Min. of Energy 13 VVER1000 NNEGC State owned 11 RBMK 1 BN600 4 Graph Mod BWR Czech Republic Rosenergoatom State 4 VVER440 owned 2 VVER1000 CEZ/ 67% State Romania owned 2 Candu PHW Nuclearelectrica State owned Slovak Republic 4/6 VVER440 Bulgaria ENEL 67% owned 2/4 VVER1000 NEC State owned Hungary Armenia 4 VVER 440 1 VVER440 MVM State owned Armatomenergo, State owned 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Vver.1200 Vver.1000 Vver.Toi (V-320)
    Engineering & Construction Division State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM New VVERs in Russia and Abroad Sergey Svetlov , Dr.Sc. (Tech.) Chief Expert for Design ASE Group (ROSATOM Corporation) 4th MDEP Conference on New Reactor Design Activities , 12.09– 13.09.17, London, UK DEVELOPMENT OF VVER DESIGN Kudankulam Bushehr-2 NPP NV-2 NPP NPP NPP in Jordan Rooppur NPP Akkuy VVER.1000 (AES-92) VVER.1200 VVER.1000 VVER.TOI (V-320) VVER.1000 (AES-91) VVER.1200 Kursk-2 NPP VVER.640 MIR-1200 Hanhikivi NPP, LNPP–2, Bel NPP Paks-II NPP Tianwan NPP Baltic NPP El-Dabaa NPP The content of this presentation is for discussion purposes only, shall not be considered as an offer and doesn’t lead to any obligations to ASE group and its affiliated companies. ASE disclaims all responsibility for any and all mistakes, quality and completeness of the information. 2 VVER.1200 Design VVER.1200 is an export name of the Russian design of the nuclear power plant known as AES-2006. It is an evolving NPP design developed on the basis of a Russian design VVER.1000. The VVER.1200 design belongs to Generation III+ . It meets all up-to-date Russian, European and international requirements for new NPP. The first units of this design are the unit #1 of Leningrad NPP-2 (LNPP-2) and the unit #1 of Novovoronezh NPP-2 in Russia. The unit #1 of Novovoronezh NPP-2 with the reactor VVER-1200 was put into operation in 2016. It is the first unit of Generation III+ under operation in the World.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosatom, Transnational Nuclear Nightmare
    RULES FOR BUSINESS RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE ASIA DEMANDS BINDING RULES ON BUSINESS October 2018 Syeda Rizwana Hasan from BELA/FoE Bangladesh at IGWG 2nd session 2016 @Victor Barro/FoEI BUILDING A STRONG ‘stop robbing peoples’ land: protest in Sri Lanka @Janaka Withanage/CEJ AND BINDING TREATY VOTING CHART Summary of Asian countries’ positions with respect to the UN Binding Treaty on Transnational Traditionally, international human rights law focuses on the role and responsibilities of states. Corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights Human rights abuses arising from the cross-border activities of corporations is the largest gap in international law. In our globalised world, companies operate between different national jurisdic- Voted for UN Presence at UNHRC Engagement with civil tions and often escape accountability. Country Binding treaty IGWG binding mandate society on UN Binding Treaty in 20145,6 treaty sessions until7 Transnational corporations (TNCs) and other companies are often implicated in human rights abuses across Asia. A destructive coal mine in Bangladesh threatens to destroy one of the world’s Not a member largest mangrove ecosystems. Hundreds of people risk being displaced from a mega-sugar plan- AUSTRALIA at the time 2016 2020 NO tation in Sri Lanka. Yet many of these crimes go on unpunished, due to corruption in local legal systems and the fact that many corporations are richer and more powerful than the states that Not a member 2015 / 2016 / seek to regulate them. BANGLAGESH at the time 2017 2017 NO In 2014, a people’s victory was celebrated at the United Nations Human Rights Council: Resolu- Proactive: meetings with tion 26/9 was adopted, establishing a new Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG)1, which has 2015 / 2016 / foreign ministry, human rights INDONESIA YES 2017 2017 a mandate to elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate TNCs and other commission and ambassador.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power: Is the Renaissance Real Or a Mirage? H-Holger Rogner & Alan Mcdonald International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1
    Nuclear Power: Is the Renaissance Real or a Mirage? H-Holger Rogner & Alan McDonald International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1 Keywords: Nuclear power status and projections, nuclear power economics, manufacturing capacity Summary In 2009, in the midst of the global financial and economic crises that began in 2008, and as the nuclear power industry posted its first two-year decline in installed capacity in history, the IAEA revised its projections for future nuclear power growth upwards. This paper summarizes the status of nuclear power in the world today and the status of all steps in the nuclear fuel cycle. It summarizes nuclear power’s prospects and important trends in key factors. It explains the reasons for optimism and rising expectations about nuclear power’s future, and it acknowledges that there is, nonetheless, much uncertainty. Conflicting indicators For nuclear power, 2009 was a second straight paradoxical year. In 2008, pprojections of future growth were revised upwards even though installed nuclear capacity actually declined during the year and no new reactors were connected to the grid. It was the first year since 1955 without at least one new reactor coming on-line. There were, however, ten construction starts, the most since 1987. In 2009 installed nuclear capacity dropped yet again, the first two-year drop in nuclear power’s history, with three reactors being retired and only two new ones connected to the grid. But the IAEA’s projections for nuclear power growth were again revised upward, by about 8%, even as the world was still dealing with the financial and economic crises that started in late 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Back to Contents
    NEWSLETTER #8 (244) AUGUST 2021 CONTENTS Back to contents ROSATOM NEWS TRENDS Kudankulam, High Five! Nuclear Technology Saves Lives Arctic Sea Lane ROSATOM GEOGRAPHY Russian Atom Reaches New Heights NEWSLETTER #8 (244) AUGUST 2021 ROSATOM NEWS Back to contents Представители ТВЭЛ, ENUSA, ENSA и IDOM подписывают меморандум we are prepared to launch mass Kudankulam, construction of Russian- designed power units with the state-of-the-art Generation High Five! III+ reactors at other sites in India. This possibility is stipulated in our existing Construction of Kudankulam Unit 5 agreements,” Director General of Rosatom has been officially kicked off. This is Alexey Likhachev said at the ceremony. the third stage of the Indian nuclear project carried out by Rosatom. Kudankulam profile The ceremony of pouring the first concrete for the basemat of Kudankulam Unit 5 The fifth power unit is constructed within located in the same-name town in the Indian the framework of a Russian- Indian treaty state of Tamil Nadu was held on June 29. signed in November 1988 and amended in June 1998. Since then, Rosatom has “The nuclear construction project in constructed and put in operation two power Kudankulam has been a symbol of close units of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power collaboration between Russia and India Plant. The first of them was connected to for many years. But it is not the time to the Indian national power grid in October rest — Rosatom possesses all the most 2013, followed by the other in August 2016. advanced nuclear energy technologies. In The two units have VVER-1000 reactors, the a partnership with our Indian colleagues, most powerful in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Reactors in the World
    REFERENCE DATA SERIES No. 2 2010 Edition Nuclear Power Reactors in the World INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978-92-0-105610-8 ISSN 1011-2642 @ 10-20781_IAEA-RDS-2-30_cover.indd 1 2010-05-26 08:59:05 REFERENCE DATA SERIES No. 2 NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS IN THE WORLD 2010 Edition INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 2010 NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS IN THE WORLD IAEA, VIENNA, 2010 IAEA-RDS-2/30 ISBN 978–92–0–105610–8 ISSN 1011–2642 Printed by the IAEA in Austria July 2010 CONTENTS Introduction . 5 Definitions . 7 Table 1. Reactors in operation, long-term shutdown and under construction, 31 Dec. 2009 . 10 Table 2. Type and net electrical power of reactors connected to the grid, 31 Dec. 2009 . 12 Table 3. Type and net electrical power of reactors under construction, 31 Dec. 2009 . 13 Table 4. Reactor years of experience, up to 31 Dec. 2009 . 14 Table 5. Operating reactors and net electrical power, 1980 to 2009 . 16 Table 6. Nuclear electricity production and share from 1980 to 2009 . 18 Table 7. Annual construction starts and connections to the grid, 1954 to 2009 . 21 Table 8. Number of new reactors connected to the grid and median construction time span . 22 Table 9. Construction starts during 2009 . 24 Table 10. Connections to the grid during 2009 . 25 Table 11. Scheduled connections to the grid during 2009 . 25 Table 12. Reactors planned for construction as known on 31 Dec. 2009 . 26 Table 13. Reactors under construction, 31 Dec. 2009 . 29 Table 14. Reactors in operation, 31 Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power As a System Good: Organizational Models for Production Along the Value-Added Chain
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wealer, Ben; von Hirschhausen, Christian R. Working Paper Nuclear power as a system good: Organizational models for production along the value-added chain DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1883 Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: Wealer, Ben; von Hirschhausen, Christian R. (2020) : Nuclear power as a system good: Organizational models for production along the value-added chain, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1883, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/222865 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Determinants of Russian Nuclear State-Owned Enterprises in Central and Eastern European Region
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2015, 5(4), 910-917. Behavioral Determinants of Russian Nuclear State-Owned Enterprises in Central and Eastern European Region Tomas Vlcek1*, Martin Jirusek2 1Department of International Relations and European Studies, Energy Security Program, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Jostova 10, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic, 2Department of International Relations and European Studies, Energy Security Program, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Jostova 10, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic. *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Rosatom State Nuclear Corporation play a substantial role in the energy sector of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region and the behavioral characteristics of the company forms the basis of this article. Rosatom is positioned as the dominant provider of nuclear technology and fuel supplies to the region, in large part stemming from the Soviet legacy in CEE countries. Compounding this challenge, nuclear energy is one of the major sources of power generation in CEE. Given the long-time, near monopoly of Russian nuclear technology/design in the region and plans to expand further the nuclear capacity of select CEE countries, the sector requires careful monitoring from both a technical and security-minded perspective. Keywords: Power Generation, Nuclear Energy, Central and Eastern Europe, Russian Federation, Rosatom State Nuclear Corporation JEL Classifications: H760, Q310, Q380, Q400, Q410, Q480, Q490 1. RESEARCH AIM AND METHODOLOGY The nuclear energy sector has a number of structural differences when compared to crude oil, natural gas or coal; most typically The goal of the research was to identify the behavioral determinants it is not dependent on certain infrastructure and the uninterrupted of these Russian nuclear state-owned enterprises (SOEs), how flow of energy supplies.
    [Show full text]