A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Some Lozi Linguistic Avoidance Strategies in Relation to Lozi Taboo Language
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A SOCIO-PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF SOME LOZI LINGUISTIC AVOIDANCE STRATEGIES IN RELATION TO LOZI TABOO LANGUAGE BY MANYANDO KAYANGULA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FUFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LINGUISTIC SCIENCE 2016 DECLARATION I, Manyando Kayangula, declare that this dissertation represents my own work; that it has not previously been submitted by any other person for a degree at the university of Zambia or any other university and it does not incorporate any published work or material from another dissertation without being acknowledged. Signed:………………………………………………… Date:………………………… i COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be reproduced of stored in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the author or the university of Zambia. @2016 Ther University of Zambia ii CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This dissertation of manyando Kayangula has been approved as a partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the Degree of Masters of Linguistic Science. Examiner’s Signature: Signed:………………………………………………… Date:………………………… Signed:………………………………………………… Date:………………………… Signed:………………………………………………… Date:………………………… iii ABSTRACT The current study examined the socio-pragmatic aspect of linguistic avoidance strategies in relation to Silozi taboo language.A socio-pragmatic study deals with communication in its socio- cultural context. Linguistic avoidance strategies refer to goal- oriented communicative behaviour where individuals keep their conversation away from words termed as taboo words. Silozi linguistic avoidance strategies are a reflection ot the socio-culture life of the Lozi. The aim of this study was to present Silozi linguistic avoidance strategies in relation to Silozi taboo language and to define their societal significance. The objectives of the study were (a) to identify and describe the types of taboo words avoided by Lozi speakers (b) to identify and describe a range of Lozi avoidance strategies in relation to taboo language (c) to establish the significance of identified Lozi linguistic avoidance strategies which are used by speakers of Silozi language. Brown and Levinson’s theory of politeness (1978), Grice’s cooperative principle(1975 ) and Stella Ting’s face negotiating theory ( 1988) were employed. The study was framed under the qualitative approachin regard to data collection and analysis. Using purposive sampling and snowball sampling, the researcher carried out semi-structured individual interviews and focus group semi- structured interviews. Twenty- five (25) key informants were purposively sampled to elicit information for this research.And forty-three (43) were in focus groups. The focus groups were as follows: Group A ( 8 members ), Group B ( 9 members ), Group C ( 6 members ), Group D ( 6 members ), Group E ( 8 members ). The study also employed observations ( participant observations, non- participant observations, unobstrusive measures) and introspection to collect data. The study revealed that Silozi taboo language is a reality to Silozi speakers, and in order to mitigate the effect of taboo language, the Lozi always use Silozi linguistic avoidance strategies. Therefore ,Silozi speakers employ euphemisms, circumlocution, understatements, tales, name avoidance, avoidance register attributed to the Litunga, in order to eliminate the impact of face- threatening speech acts ( taboo language ). The study concluded that Silozi linguistic avoidance strategies are an iceberg to Silozi culture. They are a compass to Silozi way of life. They portray a socio- pragmatic function and are not haphazardly employed. Each linguistic avoidance strategy constitutes a function. The Lozi people try to maintain and negotiate face in all communication situations, and throughout their communication , politeness takes a central role. The implication of the findings is that Silozi linguistic avoidance strategies reflect communicative competence; that is, the ability to produce and understand utterances which are not so much grammatical but, more importantly, appropriate in the context in which they are made. Therefore the study recommends that the Ministry of Education and curriculum specialists review the Silozi syllabus to include much of the stated linguistic avoidance strategies, e.g metaphors, euphemisms, proverbs and language related to the Monarch. The study also recommends that future research on linguistic avoidance could be explored using other theories. iv DEDICATION To my young sister, Mwangala Kayangula, for her unwavering support in my academic journey. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Mr S. B. Hirst ,whose assistance helped me complete this thesis. I also extend my sincere gratitude to linguistic lecturers who taught me in the first year of my Masters degree course. Without their support, my Masters studies would have remained a pipe dream. I thank Mr Ephat Mudenda for proofreading this document. My gratitude is also extended to Mr Lutombi Mwananyanda (head teacher – Sesheke Secondary School) who facilitated my two years paid leave. All these people’s efforts helped to ensure that my dreams come to fruition. vi Table of Contents DECLARATION ................................................................................................................................................ i COPYRIGHT .................................................................................................................................................... ii CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ......................................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION .................................................................................................................................................. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ vi CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 . GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 THE SILOZI LANGUAGE ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 THE LOZI PEOPLE .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.3 . BACKGROUND TO AVOIDANCE STRATEGIES IN RELATION TO TABOO LANGUAGE. .......................... 2 1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM .............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.0 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.I AIM OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 .RESEARCH QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.6. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 6 1.7 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 BROWN AND LEVINSON’S POLITENESS THEORY .................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 .POLITENESS STRATEGIES ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.7.2 GRICE’S COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE. ...................................................................................................... 9 1.7.3 STELLA TING-TOOMEY’S FACE NEGOTIATION THEORY (1998) ......................................................... 10 1.8 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SENSITIVE RESEARCH............................................................................ 12 1.9.LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................. 13 1.10. SCOPE OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................................... 13 1.11 STRUCTURE OF THE DISSERTATION ................................................................................................. 13 1.11 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................................ 15 LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................................................................................