DOCSLIB.ORG

Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Membership the Rev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Membership the Rev Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Membership The Rev. Dr. Ruth Meyers, Chair Chicago, V 2015 The Rev. Jennifer Phillips, Vice-Chair Rio Grande, VII 2012 Mr. John Repulski, Secretary Michigan, V 2015 The Rt. Rev. Sergio Carranza-Gomez* Los Angeles, VIII 2012 Ms. Martha K. Baker* Missouri, V 2012 Mr. Samuel Cheung* New York, II 2012 Ms. Rebecca Clark* Olympia, VIII 2012 Mr. Dent Davidson Chicago, V 2015 The Rt. Rev. Thomas Ely Vermont, I 2015 Br. Christopher Hamlett, O.P. Virginia, III 2015 Mr. Sandra Montes Texas, VII 2012 Ms. Jeannine Otis New York, II 2012 The Rt. Rev. John McKee Sloan Alabama, IV 2015 The Rev. Dr. Louis Weil California, VIII 2015 The Rt. Rev. Pierre Welte Whalon* Churches in Europe, II 2012 The Rev. Canon Sandye Wilson, EC Liaison Newark, II The Rev. Canon Gregory Howe, Custodian to the Standard Book of Common Prayer Mr. Frank Tedeschi, CPI Liaison* Ms. Nancy Bryan, CPI Liaison* The Rev. Tom Brackett, Staff Changes in Membership Four changes in membership occurred during the triennium: Bishop Pierre Whalon replaced Bishop Sergio Carranza- Gomez in November 2009; Martha Baker replaced Rebecca Clark in September 2010, who replaced Samuel Cheung in November 2009; and Ms. Nancy Bryan joined as the new liaison from Church Publishing Incorporated in October 2011. Representation at General Convention Deputy Ruth Meyers and Bishop Kee Sloan are authorized to receive non-substantive amendments to the report at Convention. Summary of Work Meetings • November 17–20, 2009, Chicago, Illinois • March 10–13, 2010, Linthicum Heights, Maryland • October 18–20, 2010, Concord, New Hampshire • March 15–19, 2011, Atlanta, Georgia • June 22, 2011, web/teleconference • October 11–15, 2011, Bloomington, Minnesota • November 14, 2011, teleconference Hymnal Revision Study Project Chair: Jeannine Otis In response to the 76th General Convention’s mandate in Resolution 2009-B004, the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music undertook a feasibility study on the need for revision of The Hymnal 1982 with the assistance of the Church Pension Group’s Office of Research. 162 Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music The primary instrument for this study was an online questionnaire with three separate, role-specific versions: one for congregation members, one for clergy, and one for music directors. This instrument, in its various versions, was created by the Office of Research team in consultation with the Commission, Episcopal research colleagues, and subject-matter experts. Spanish translations of the surveys were created and made available online. The surveys covered a few major content areas: • congregational details (location, languages, and staffing) • worship music resources (book availability, book and style, frequency of use) • personal worship and worship music experiences • opinions on current music resources and styles • individual demographics (age, gender, race, general musical tastes) All surveys included a free-text comment section at the end to capture qualitative information participants wished to share. Similar but more role-specific online questionnaires covering the same fundamental content areas were created for and administered to bishops and seminarians. The survey was conducted in two phases: first, a stratified random sample of congregations, based on the proportionate number of total members across the church according to parish size; second, a “snowball” or viral sample, in which the survey was opened up to all clergy, music directors, and congregation members who wished to participate. Information about the survey was disseminated widely through articles and news releases on Episcopal News Service and through the Office of Public Affairs, through the Episcopal Communicators network, by members of the Commission contacting stakeholder groups directly, by e-mail to all clergy for whom the Church Pension Fund had an e-mail address on record, and through a dedicated page on the Office of Research’s area of the CPG website. Between the stratified random sample and the “snowball” sample, responses were received from 9,016 congregation members, 2,575 clergy, and 1,139 music directors, representing 3,060 congregations (roughly 40% of all parishes). Additionally, 55 bishops completed the dedicated bishops’ survey, and 102 seminarians completed the dedicated seminarians’ survey. In order to address specific populations of The Episcopal Church, the research team also conducted in-person, structured interviews. One portion of these interviews was conducted in focus groups with seminary faculty members at seminaries of The Episcopal Church. The research team also sought to study the unique cultures and musical experiences of worship in Province IX. Members of the research team visited a selection of Province IX dioceses (Puerto Rico, Ecuador Central, and the Dominican Republic). During these visits, team members conducted interviews with bishops and with clergy and music leaders of parishes in the dioceses, attended parish worship services, video-recorded the various musical styles experienced in different parishes, and gained perspective on the cultural climate of these dioceses in terms of musical tradition, worship, and the environment in which the Church ministers. A full version of the Hymnal Revision Feasibility Study report made by the research team to the Commission is available for download on the CPG website (https://www.cpg.org/redirects/reports-statistics-on-church-related-topics/), and the Commission commends it to all bishops and deputies, as it goes into a level of detail and analysis not possible in the brief summary given here. The table below summarizes the responses of congregation members, clergy, music directors, bishops, and seminarians to the principle question, “Do you think a new, revised version of the Hymnal is needed?” Averages are based on participants’ responses on a 1-to-5 scale: (1) Not at all, (2) Not very much, (3) Neutral, (4) Very much, (5) Completely. “Do you think a new, revised version of the Hymnal is needed?” Congregation Members Clergy Music Directors Bishops Seminarians Against 48.4% 35.7% 33.8% 37.6% 33.3% Neutral 27.2% 23.4% 22.3% 27.1% 18.5% In Favor 24.4% 40.9% 43.8% 35.4% 48.2% Average 2.6 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.3 163 Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music Respondents in the congregation member sample opposed hymnal revision by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1. And although clergy and music directors were more favorably disposed to revision, the average response for all of these categories falls below neutral (congregation members and bishops) or just slightly above neutral (clergy, music directors, and seminarians). As reported by congregation members, The Hymnal 1982 remains the medium of choice for worship music in The Episcopal Church. Over 95 percent of congregants report using The Hymnal 1982 at least once per week for worship. The preeminence of The Hymnal 1982 stands in contrast to the relatively low usage rates of the authorized supplements. Lift Every Voice and Sing II and Wonder, Love, and Praise are used at least once per month by around 30 percent of congregants, whereas El Himnario, My Heart Sings Out, Voices Found, and The Hymnal 1940 are rarely used. Frequency of Hymnal / supplement use, as reported by congregation members Less than once/month At least once/month At least once/week The Hymnal 1982 2.7% 1.7% 95.5% El Himnario 97.8% 0.7% 1.5% LEVAS II 70.1% 21.9% 7.9% My Heart Sings Out 98.7% 1.0% 0.4% Voices Found 97.1% 2.4% 0.4% Wonder, Love, & Praise 66.7% 27.1% 6.2% The Hymnal 1940 93.0% 2.5% 4.5% When asked to rate how their current hymnal or hymnal supplements satisfy their congregation’s needs on the 5-point scale, congregation members, clergy, and music directors responded in very similar terms. The most favored resource of all three groups is The Hymnal 1982, with a mean rating for all three samples of nearly 4. By and large, congregation members, clergy, and music directors all view hymnal supplements much less favorably in terms of the supplements’ ability to satisfy their congregations’ needs, as no supplement had a mean score higher than 3 in any sample. Satisfaction (means) with The Hymnal 1982 and supplements Congregation Members Clergy Music Directors The Hymnal 1982 4.00 3.92 4.03 El Himnario 1.96 1.63 1.59 LEVAS II 2.94 2.93 2.90 My Heart Sings Out 2.01 2.05 2.06 Voices Found 2.03 2.19 2.29 Wonder, Love, & Praise 2.98 2.98 3.00 The Hymnal 1940 3.03 2.16 2.73 It is important to note that the results described above reflect the responses of congregation members, clergy, and music directors in the domestic dioceses of The Episcopal Church. The experiences and needs of the congregations and dioceses in Province IX are radically different. Clergy and musicians in Province IX expressed clearly to the research interviewers that the currently available authorized musical resources of The Episcopal Church do not meet their needs in terms of worship style, theological and cultural context, and affordability. Clergy from all types of congregations wanted a resource that would combine the best of El Himnario, Latin American charismatic music, and the new music of the Pentecostal movement. The research team perceived a strong need and desire for new material to be developed and, most importantly, to be available at a cost that would make it realistically obtainable by congregations that serve the poorer members of those societies. It was clear that this work should begin immediately. The data from domestic dioceses of The Episcopal Church indicate that African Americans and Native Americans are more favorably disposed toward hymnal revision; over one-third of those who identified themselves in these groups favor a revised hymnal, while fewer than one-fourth of Whites/Caucasians and Asian/Pacific Islanders are supportive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation
    Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation by Brittany Pladek A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Brittany Pladek (2013) Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation Brittany Pladek Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto 2013 Abstract This study uses the interdisciplinary lens of Romantic medical ethics to reconsider received ideas about the therapeutic power of Romantic poetry. Studies of literature and medicine in the long nineteenth century have generally considered disease the era’s main medical symbol; they have likewise considered holistic “healing” its major model for poetry’s therapeutic effect, following Geoffrey Hartman’s description of Wordsworth’s ability to “heal the wound of self.” Without denying the importance of these paradigms, my work explores alternate foci: pain instead of disease, and palliation instead of healing. In Britain, professional medical ethics were first codified during the Romantic period in response to a variety of medical and social advances. But because of Romantic medicine’s curative uncertainty and utilitarian intolerance for pain, its ethicists turned from cure to palliation to describe a doctor’s primary duty toward his patients. My study argues that this palliative ethic was taken up by Romantic literary writers to describe their own work. By engaging with contemporary medical ethics treatises such as John Gregory’s 1770 Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician and Thomas Percival’s 1803 Medical Ethics, I explore four Romantic authors’ struggle to find an appropriate medical model for their work’s therapeutic benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Activity and Influence of the Established Church in England, C. 1800-1837
    The Activity and Influence of the Established Church in England, c. 1800-1837 Nicholas Andrew Dixon Pembroke College, Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. November 2018 Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. Nicholas Dixon November 2018 ii Thesis Summary The Activity and Influence of the Established Church in England, c. 1800-1837 Nicholas Andrew Dixon Pembroke College, Cambridge This thesis examines the various ways in which the Church of England engaged with English politics and society from c. 1800 to 1837. Assessments of the early nineteenth-century Church of England remain coloured by a critique originating in radical anti-clerical polemics of the period and reinforced by the writings of the Tractarians and Élie Halévy. It is often assumed that, in consequence of social and political change, the influence of a complacent and reactionary church was irreparably eroded by 1830.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Theses
    Australian National University THESES SIS/LIBRARY TELEPHONE: +61 2 6125 4631 R.G. MENZIES LIBRARY BUILDING NO:2 FACSIMILE: +61 2 6125 4063 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY EMAIL: [email protected] CANBERRA ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA USE OF THESES This copy is supplied for purposes of private study and research only. Passages from the thesis may not be copied or closely paraphrased without the written consent of the author. WILLIAM GRANT BROUGHTON AND HIS EARLY YEARS IN NEW SOUTH WALES G.P. Shaw. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Australian National University. 1970. This thesis is the result of original research conducted by the author in the Department of History, School of General Studies, Australian National University, between January 1967 and January 1970. (0U~> George Peter Shaw. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was written with the aid of a Research Scholarship granted by the Australian National University, and taken out in the Department of History at the School of General Studies. There the patient wisdom of Professor Manning Clark first stimulated and encouraged, and then with equanimity assisted in the evolution of a set of ideas he could scarcely be expected to share. He and Broughton provided a zestful and provocative dialectic, and my debt to each is not to be measured in these few words. Professor C.M. Williams’ sharp wit saved me from some errors, and under his guiding hand the staff and students of the History Department provided several hot contests and much useful criticism at those Wednesday afternoon seminars. To all at the School of General Studies who helped turn the award of a scholarship into a rich three-year sojourn I return by gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends Acquisitions 1964-2018
    Acquired with the Aid of the Friends Manuscripts 1964: Letter from John Dury (1596-1660) to the Evangelical Assembly at Frankfurt-am- Main, 6 August 1633. The letter proposes a general assembly of the evangelical churches. 1966: Two letters from Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury, to Nicholas of Lucca, 1413. Letter from Robert Hallum, Bishop of Salisbury concerning Nicholas of Lucca, n.d. 1966: Narrative by Leonardo Frescobaldi of a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1384. 1966: Survey of church goods in 33 parishes in the hundreds of Blofield and Walsham, Norfolk, 1549. 1966: Report of a debate in the House of Commons, 27 February 1593. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Petition to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners by Miles Coverdale and others, 1565. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Correspondence and papers of Christopher Wordsworth (1807-1885), Bishop of Lincoln. 1968: Letter from John Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, to John Boys, 1599. 1968: Correspondence and papers of William Howley (1766-1848), Archbishop of Canterbury. 1969: Papers concerning the divorce of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. 1970: Papers of Richard Bertie, Marian exile in Wesel, 1555-56. 1970: Notebook of the Nonjuror John Leake, 1700-35. Including testimony concerning the birth of the Old Pretender. 1971: Papers of Laurence Chaderton (1536?-1640), puritan divine. 1971: Heinrich Bullinger, History of the Reformation. Sixteenth century copy. 1971: Letter from John Davenant, Bishop of Salisbury, to a minister of his diocese [1640]. 1971: Letter from John Dury to Mr. Ball, Preacher of the Gospel, 1639. 1972: ‘The examination of Valentine Symmes and Arthur Tamlin, stationers, … the Xth of December 1589’.
    [Show full text]
  • Wu Rare Item Post.Pdf (89.03Kb)
    Dorothy Wordsworth’s Letter and Its Significance By: Crystal Wu This post shall spotlight Dorothy Wordsworth’s unpublished letter “1820, June 2, Dorothy Wordsworth to Joshua Watson and John James Watson” housed in the Armstrong Browning Library Rare Letters collection. Although Dorothy is not as well-known as her brother William Wordsworth, her letter brings a new insight on the wide connections the Wordsworths have, and how these connections might have possibly influenced William Wordsworth’s change of focus in his later poems. In addition, the letter illustrates the care and thought that Dorothy put into writing the letter. The content of this letter involves Dorothy Wordsworth updating Joshua Watson and John James Watson on the health of Christopher Wordsworth, another brother of Dorothy and William Wordsworth. Interestingly, the letter is divided into parts, with the first part addressed to Joshua, and the second part addressed to John. At the time of the letter, Christopher had been recuperating after a bout of illness. Despite the letter being a personal correspondence, there is an air of formality. This may have been due to Dorothy’s relationship with the Watsons as acquaintances, rather than as close friends. In addition, she discusses the well-being of Mrs. Norris. William and his wife are briefly mentioned at the end of the letter, although simply as a passing remark. At first glance, there seems to be a smaller, cramped handwriting on the first page of the letter, followed by a larger handwriting. Upon further research, it is noted that the handwritings are of two different people, Joshua Watson and Dorothy Wordsworth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poems of William Wordsworth Collected Reading Texts from the Cornell Wordsworth
    The Poems of William Wordsworth Collected Reading Texts from The Cornell Wordsworth Edited by Jared Curtis In Three Volumes A Complimentary Addendum HEB ☼ Humanities-Ebooks For advice on use of this ebook please scroll to page 2 Using this Ebook t * This book is designed to be read in single page view, using the ‘fit page’ command. * To navigate through the contents use the hyperlinked ‘Bookmarks’ at the left of the screen. * To search, click the search symbol. * For ease of reading, use <CTRL+L> to enlarge the page to full screen, and return to normal view using < Esc >. * Hyperlinks (if any) appear in Blue Underlined Text. Permissions You may print a copy of the book for your own use but copy and paste functions are disabled. No part of this publication may be otherwise reproduced or transmitted or distributed without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher. Making or distributing copies of this book would constitute copyright infringement and would be liable to prosecution. Thank you for respecting the rights of the author. An Addendum to The Poems of William Wordsworth Collected Reading Texts from The Cornell Wordsworth Series In Three Volumes Edited by Jared Curtis HEB ☼ Humanities-Ebooks, LLP © Jared Curtis, 2012 The Author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this Work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published by Humanities-Ebooks, LLP, Tirril Hall, Tirril, Penrith CA10 2JE. Cover image, Sunburst over Martindale © Richard Gravil The reading texts of Wordsworth’s poems used in this volume are from the Cornell Wordsworth series, published by Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, NY 14850.
    [Show full text]
  • Recollections of the Table-Talk of Samuel
    TABLE-TALK OF SAMUEL ROGERS. POESONIANA. ISAAC FOOT LIBRARY PKINTED BV JOHN BALE AND SONS, GREAT TITCHFIELD STREET, OXFORD STREET, W. : RECOLLECTIONS Table-talk of samuel Rogers. TO WHICH IS ADDED porsoniana. EDITED I!Y THE LATE KEV. ALEXANDEE DYCE. NEW SOUTHGATE H. A. ROGEES, 2, BOUNDS GEEEN EOAD. 1887. A^ ;: > ^ LIBRARY IZ^ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA ;^^ BARJBAIiA ^^7 PREFACE TO THE TABLE-TALK OF SAMUEL KOGEKS. Samuel Kogeus was born at Stoke Newiugton, SOtli July, 17G3. His first publication, An Ode to Siiperstilion, ivUh some other Poems, ajDpeared in 1786 ; at which period the coldly classic Mason (then a veteran) and the feeble Hay- ley were perhaps the most popular of our living poets Cowper, though The Task* was in print, had scarcely won all his fame; Crabbe had put forth only his earlier pieces ; and Darwin was yet to come. By The Pleasures of Memory^ in 1792, Mr, Rogers rose to high reputation which he fully maintained by his Epistle to a Friend, with other Poems, in 1798, He gave nothing new to the public till 1812, when he added Columhusi to a re-im- pression of his Poems. It was succeeded, in 1814 by his * The second volume of Cowper's Poems, containing The Tasli, is noticed with high praise in The Gentleman's Matjazine for Dec. 1785. t Seep. 153 (note) in the present volume. vi. PREFACE, Jacqueline^ in 181'J by his Human Life^ and in 1822 by the First Part*- of his Italy, which was not completed till several years after, and which closes the series of his works.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEXTS of the CADAVER TOMB IN. FIFTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND a Volumes (T) Volume Ltext
    CONTEXTS OF THE CADAVER TOMB IN. FIFTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND a Volumes (T) Volume LText. PAMELA MARGARET KING D. Phil. UNIVERSITY OF YORK CENTRE FOR MEDIEVAL STUDIES October, 1987. TABLE QE CONTENTS Volume I Abstract 1 List of Abbreviations 2 Introduction 3 I The Cadaver Tomb in Fifteenth Century England: The Problem Stated. 7 II The Cadaver Tomb in Fifteenth Century England: The Surviving Evidence. 57 III The Cadaver Tomb in Fifteenth Century England: Theological and Literary Background. 152 IV The Cadaver Tomb in England to 1460: The Clergy and the Laity. 198 V The Cadaver Tomb in England 1460-1480: The Clergy and the Laity. 301 VI The Cadaver Tomb in England 1480-1500: The Clergy and the Laity. 372 VII The Cadaver Tomb in Late Medieval England: Problems of Interpretation. 427 Conclusion 484 Appendix 1: Cadaver Tombs Elsewhere in the British Isles. 488 Appendix 2: The Identity of the Cadaver Tomb in York Minster. 494 Bibliography: i. Primary Sources: Unpublished 499 ii. Primary Sources: Published 501 iii. Secondary Sources. 506 Volume II Illustrations. TABU QE ILLUSTRATIONS Plates 2, 3, 6 and 23d are the reproduced by permission of the National Monuments Record; Plates 28a and b and Plate 50, by permission of the British Library; Plates 51, 52, 53, a and b, by permission of Trinity College, Cambridge. Plate 54 is taken from a copy of an engraving in the possession of the office of the Clerk of Works at Salisbury Cathedral. I am grateful to Kate Harris for Plates 19 and 45, to Peter Fairweather for Plate 36a, to Judith Prendergast for Plate 46, to David O'Connor for Plate 49, and to the late John Denmead for Plate 37b.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PATER NOSTER and the LAITY in ENGLAND C.700
    THE PATER NOSTER AND THE LAITY IN ENGLAND c.700 - 1560 WITH SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE CLERGY’S USE OF THE PRAYER TO STRUCTURE BASIC CATECHETICAL TEACHING ANNA EDITH GOTTSCHALL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH SCHOOL OF ENGLISH, DRAMA AND AMERICAN AND CANADIAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM NOVEMBER 2014 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. At present no scholar has provided an in-depth study into the dissemination of the Pater Noster outside the clerical sphere. This thesis provides a detailed consideration of the ways in which the Pater Noster was taught to the laity in medieval England. It explores the central position of the prayer in the lay curriculum, the constitutions which played a fundamental role in its teaching, and the methods by which it was disseminated. Clerical expositions of the prayer and its tabular and diagrammatic representations are examined to consider the material available to assist the clergy in their pedagogical role. The ways in which material associated with the Pater Noster was modified and delivered to a lay audience provides an important component in the holistic approach of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bishops' Wordsworth Collection Catalogue Radcliffe Library
    The Bishops’ Wordsworth Collection Catalogue Radcliffe Library, Liverpool Cathedral Originally compiled by James Deboo, Lancaster University, 2002 Amended by Andrew Caine, Cataloguer, Liverpool Hope University, 2016 Updated by Karen Backhouse, Special Collections Librarian, 2017 1 Contents Abbreviations Description A. Manuscrips B. Books written by the Wordsworth Family B1. Books by Christopher W B2. Books by CW B3. Books by Charles W B4. Books by JW B5. Books by Chris W B6. Books by other members of the Wordsworth family C. Books belonging to the Wordsworth Family CI. Books belonging to John W C2. Books belonging to CW C3. Books belonging to Charles W C4. Books belonging to JW C5. Books belonging to Chris W C6. Books belonging to other members of the Wordsworth family C7. Other books 2 Abbreviations WW William Wordsworth, 1770-1850, poet. Christopher W Christopher Wordsworth, 1774-1846, Master of Trinity, Cambridge. John W John Wordsworth, 1805-39, Trinity Scholar. Charles W Charles Wordsworth, 1806-92, Bishop of St. Andrews. CW Christopher Wordsworth, 1807-1885, Bishop of Lincoln. EW Elizabeth Wordsworth, 1840 -1932, Lady Principal of LMH, Oxford. JW John Wordsworth, 1843-1911, Bishop of Salisbury. Chris W Christopher Wordsworth, 1848-c.1938, Sub-Dean of Salisbury. OBW Oswald B. Wordsworth, -1918. WAW William Arthur Wordsworth, c. 1881- 1957, Clergyman. For detailed biographical information, see Salisbury Diocesan Gazettes in collection. Other family members: Dora Wordsworth (Quillinan), (1804-1847), daughter of WW. Susanna Hartley Wordsworth (Frere), (1811-1884), wife of CW, mother of JW, Chris W & EW. Susanna Wordsworth, (1846-1912), daughter of CW, sister of JW, Chris W & EW.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Diocesan Bishops
    WorkSpirit 19/1/05 13:12 Page i Working with the Spirit: choosing diocesan bishops A review of the operation of the Crown Appointments Commission and related matters GS 1405 WorkSpirit 19/1/05 13:12 Page ii Church House Publishing Published 2001 for the Church House Archbishops’ Council of the Great Smith Street Church of England by Church London House Publishing SW1P 3NZ © The Archbishops’ Council 2001 ISBN 0 7151 3853 7 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored or transmitted by any means or in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any Cover design by Visible Edge information storage and retrieval Typeset in 10 pt Sabon system without written permission, Printed in England by which should be sought from the Copyright and Contracts Administrator, The Archbishops’ Creative Print and Design Group, Council, Church House, Great Ebbw Vale, Wales Smith Street, London SW1P 3NZ (Tel: 020 7898 1557; Fax: 020 7898 1449; Email: copyright@c-of- e.org.uk). This report has the authority only of the Review Group which produced it. WorkSpirit 19/1/05 13:12 Page iii A bishop is called to lead in serving and caring for the people of God and to work with them in the oversight of the Church. As a chief pastor he shares with his fellow bishops a special responsibility to maintain and further the unity of the Church, to uphold its discipline, and to guard its faith. He is to promote mission throughout the world. It is his duty to watch over and pray for those committed to his charge, and to teach and govern them after the example of the Apostles, speaking in the name of God and interpreting the gospel of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • William Wordsworth in Context
    WILLIAM WORDSWORTH IN CONTEXT William Wordsworth’s poetry responded to the enormous literary, political, cultural, technological and social changes that the poet lived through during his lifetime (1770‒1850), and to his own transforma- tion from young radical inspired by the French Revolution to Poet Laureate and supporter of the establishment. The poet of the ‘ego- tistical sublime’ who wrote the pioneering autobiographical master- piece, The Prelude, and whose work is remarkable for its investigation of personal impressions, memories and experiences, is also the poet who is critically engaged with the cultural and political developments of his era. William Wordsworth in Context presents thirty-five concise chapters on contexts crucial for an understanding and appreciation of this leading Romantic poet. It focuses on his life, circle and poetic composition; on his reception and influence; on the significance of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century literary contexts; and on the historical, political, scientific and philosophical issues that helped to shape Wordsworth’s poetry and prose. andrew bennett is Professor of English and Director of the Centre for Romantic and Victorian Studies at the University of Bristol. HispublicationsincludeRomantic Poets and the Culture of Posterity (Cambridge, 1999), Wordsworth Writing (Cambridge, 2007), Ignorance: Literature and Agnoiology (2009) and, with Nicholas Royle, An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory (4th edn, 2009)andThis Thing Called Literature: Reading, Thinking, Writing (2015). WILLIAM WORDSWORTH IN CONTEXT edited by ANDREW BENNETT University Printing House, Cambridge CB28BS, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
    [Show full text]