Six Year Improvementprogram
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Six Year ImprovementProgram Fiscal Years 1996-97 thru 2001-2002 Interstate, Primary, Urban and II Secondary Highway Systems dm Public Transit, Ports and Airports @ 1996,Common HOW TO READ THE SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Six-Year Improvement Program is divided into the nine construction districts that comprise the Virginia Department of Transportation. (YOU may be looking at an abbreviated program that covers only your district.) Within each district, the program is divided into four categories: Interstate, Primary, Urban and Secondary Systems. The pages in the statewide Six-Year Improvement Program have eight columns, some of which are divided into subcolumns. This text will describe each column and how it functions within the program. ROUTE. COUNTYICITY. TYPE. LENGTH Generally self-explanatory, this column identifies the route number on which the project is located, the county or city where the road is located, the type of work that will be done on this project, and the length of the project. Projects me listed in numerical order by route number, except for the Urban System. Urban projects are listed alphabetically by cityhown. “(pE Only)” means finds to finance only preliminary engineering work have been allocated to date. DESCRIPTION This column gives a location description of the project limits. The route number and the length of the project are known from the previous column. This column gives reference points indicating where the work will take place. ESTIMATED COST (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) The estimated costs given in this column begin as rough estimates usually based on historical data for the area. As work progresses, a better cost estimate can be developed. The estimated costs are updated at critical stages such as the time of the final field inspection, when plans are more defined and estimates can be relied upon to closely compare with the final project costs. To the far Iefl of the ESTIMATED COST column box the letters PE, RW, CN and TO appear with the cost estimates to their right. m This stands for preliminary engineering. In this phase a preliminary field survey, utility location, environmental/historical studies, road design alternatives, drawings, final field inspections and public hearings will be done. This process can take a few months to several years to complete. A time line showing how long this phase will last for this project can be found on this row in the ACTUAL ALLOCATION and PROJECTED ALLOCATION COhlIINIS. RJy This stands for right of way. This is the portion of the project in which negotiations with property owners take place, payments are made and arrangements with utility companies are finalized, to obtain the land necessary for the project. AS with the PE portion, the cost estimates are to the i -d2RI - vlliu &L - dLS s HN - WI Vu XI . W - WU ID - Interstate Discretionary RRs - Rail Highway Grade Separation IM - Interstate Maintenance ACTUAL ALLOCATION The column shows how much money has been allocated to the project for the fiscal year in which the Six-Year Improvement Program was published. It is the current year’s allocation. The years shown under the ACTUAL ALLOCATION and PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS header, represent fiscal years beginning July 1 and ending June 30. The horizontal lines found in the year columns depict time lines for the PE, RW, and Construction activities. The placement of the time line within the fiscal year column indicates the start of the activity. Each column represents the 4 quarters of the fiscal year, with the start of each time line encompassing a span of three months. For example, a project activity starting in the second quarter of the fiscal year could be interpreted as beginning in October, November or December. At the bottom of the ACTUAL ALLOCATION box, there is a long number with dashes and letters. This is the official state project number. This number appears on all documents and correspondence related to the project. In the Urban portion of the Six-Year Improvement Program, the project number is found in the DESCRIPTION PROJECT NUMBER column. The project number can be broken as follows: Example: (FO)OR(NFO)0340-O07- 1O6,PE104,RW2O4,C5O4 (FO)-(NFO) beginning with Fiscal Year 1995-96 new projects showing a prefix in parentheses of “FO” represents federal oversight and “NFO” represents no federal oversight. 0340- means that this project is located on Route 340. A project beginning with UOOOis an Urban project and located only in a city. Those projects beginning with a 6, such as 6522, mean the road is an arterial corridor. oo7- is a county/city code. 007 is the code for Augusta County. 106- is a section number assigned sequentially along each route. This number also helps differentiate this project from others on Route 340 in Augusta County. An “S” in place of the first digit represents a safety project, an “F” represents federal oversight in all phases and a “V” represents no federal oversight past the environmental process. PE104- is the preliminary engineering number. Usually this is a 101 number. A 104 number indicates that three other ● . 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS l?OLUME 11 CMAO Promvim Enhancement Prozram vi FOREWORD This program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board’s plan for the use of funds anticipated to be available for ports, airports, public transit, and highway construction in the 1996-97 fiscal year. The Board also uses this Six-Year Program to distribute funds anticipated for the next five fiscal years through 2001-2002. The revenue projections on which this program is based include all finds anticipated, both federal and state, to be available for distribution by the Board as mandated by State statutes for preliminary engineering, right of way, and construction on the Interstate, Primary, Urban, and Secondary Systems, as well as fhnds anticipated to be available for ports, airports, and rail and public transportation. To seek the maximum input from the public, hearings are held yearly in each of the nine construction districts in the Commonwealth. Advice and input are solicited from members of the General Assembly, members of the county boards of supervisors, city council members, other public officials, and the general public. This year hundreds of individuals attended these hearings, and their input into this program is highly significant. The Board’s principal objectives in developing this particular update of the program are to complete the financing of projects that are under way or completed, to upgrade the most pressing needs on the primary System, to respond to the transportation needs of cities and towns, support public transit, and provide finds from the commonwealth Tr~sportation Trust Fund to upgrade ports and airports. 1 z Statewide Summary (In Thousands of Dollars) Fiscal Years Allocation 6S8’199’S Lt70’L99 88S’SS9 SL6’909 lZf’S8S Lt79’LLs z8i7’68s S21flNlIA2RI NOISSW W’1321dS SZV’96 622’8 z16’6 0Z6’11 LIC’P1 8LI’LI f)NIATOAl121 S211JJT13VLI TIO& L8$’91O’S LS9’8SS 9i70’oss 998’S0S Lso’s8t7 SZ9’CLt7 LH’L9J7 SAVMH51H CL9’SOS 828’ss 9zrcs 889’0S 608’8t7 z60’8t7 0L9’VZZ t%o’lb Lt70’6E 9SZ’LE SL8’SE LW’SE 619’9L LS6’CI Z8Z’EI ZL9CZI 202’21 Ezo’zl S8S’t7 LE8 L6L 09L ZfL IZL tXL’CSl S60’8Z 18L’9Z L09’SZ OZL’PZ SZP’PZ 9oI’t7z 9SL’6S ZWCZI 811’11 t7i76’6 LSO’6 Z9L’8 W’8 8L6’E6 E99’SI E99’SI E99’SI E99’SI S99’SI E99’SI W9’68 8CZ’91 Szs’sl s68’i71 8Si7’t71 O!X’P1 OZZ’PI 6Z6’LI 8t7Z’S SOI’E 6L6CZ 888’2 998’2 t7t78’Z LS8’SE S6V’9 602’9 8s6’s SLL’S ZCL’S 889’S LS8’SE S69’9 602’9 8s6’s SLL’S ZEL’S 889’S Tvxm’ ZO-IOOZ mmm 00-6661 66-8661 86-L661 - lIflN3AXlI NOISSW W12XdS MO NOIJXMIWLSKI ~IVUKI (INfMl MMNLL NOIJXL210dSNVWL TOLL FACILITIES REVOLVINGACCOUNT FY97 thru FY02 (In Thousandsof Dollars) RCUTE ADD‘L COUNTY/CITY FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTEDALLOCATIONS BALANCE TYPE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED PREVIOUS REQUIREO ALLOCATION LENGTH COST FUNDING FUND CO+l~ET1 SOURCE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 ‘7 - Bridge over PE Gloucester York River RW md York CN TO *38,211 10,289 10,289 - . * Additionalfundingprovidedfrom Fredericksburg and Suffolkdistrictprimary allocatlons (See Pages 54 & 217), federa1 demonstrateion pro,“ects,and revenuebond proceeds il - James River Crossing PE lamesCity (AdditionalFerry RU md Surry Service) CN TO *1O,432 . Ferry boat construction comp(ete * Additionalfunding from federal demonstrationpro,ects IirginiaBeach Oak Grove Connector - PE 5#039 md Chesapeake Route 44 RW 50,545 CN 213,390 southeastern TO 268,974 * 6,733 258,273 - 258,2Z [xpressway 20.7 Miles * Additionalfundingfrom Urban Ai(ocations (See Pa!e 243) ‘6 - PowhiteExtension: PE chesterfield Route 150 - RW Route 360 CN TO 22,748 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 12.6 Miles >ortsmouth PinnersPoint PE Interchange RW (Port Norfolk CN Connector) TO 21,733 33,327 14,794 11,248 7,285 - Additionalfuridingshown on page 239 Iorfolkand Midtown Tunne1 PE ~ortsmouth RW CN TO 4,700 - 5 9 . 6ZZ‘8 Z16’6 OZ6’11 21s’91 841’,L1 898’M 1Wlol l)~a!}JaJs13~~ - - OOL’Z 01 purlpuolulp!)j N3 JO A3!3 ‘~JOA ml J~3ua0 W !AJaS ‘Ja3sa3no]9 3d Jawo3sn3 1lolsej ‘unopnol‘xe~J!e~ (Lzz a6ed =s) suo!aeaolle ueqJr)~oJJ 6u@m ~ SnO!AaJd~ 6ZZ’9 Z16’Z 0Z6’6 Z!zo‘s 0E6’S S89’S * 01 : 3d wm 89L a3noti aqeadesaq3 Zo”Looz 1O-OOOZ 00-6661 66-8661 86-1661 16-9661 Xmas l131dW03 aNn4 !JNIaNn4 1s03 H19N31 NOI1V3011V a3utn03iiSi101A3tid a3ivwtls3 NOIldIWS3(J 3dAl 3Jkl SNOI1v3011v a3133roMd mm 9NtaNn4 AL13/AlNno3 1,aov 31noM (sJel100 }0 spuesnoqlUI) ZOA4 nJW L6A4 lNl103Xf!)NIA1OA3NS3111113V41101 DULLES TOLL ROAD IMPROVEMENTPROGRAM FY97 thru FY02 (In Thousandsof Dollars) NORTHERNVIRGINIADISTRICT RWTE ADD‘L COUNTY/CITY FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTEDALLOCATIONS BALANCE TYPE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED PREVIUJS REQUIRED ALLOCATION LENGTH COST FUNDING FUND .COl~ETE SOURCE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 !67- Route 28 - Route 495 PE 2,330 AutomaticVehicte RM - ldentification/ CN 15,157 ElectronicToll TO 17,487 17,169 318 318 - .