DOCSLIB.ORG

Census Data/Projections, 1999 & 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Census Data/Projections, 1999 & 2000 Census data/Projections, 1999 & 2000 Jan - June and July - December Relief Bens., Supplementary Feeding Bens. TIGRAY Zone 1994 census 1999 beneficiaries - May '99 2000 beneficiaries - Jan 2000 July - Dec 2000 Bens Zone ID/prior Wereda Total Pop. 1999 Pop. 1999 Bens. 1999 bens % 2000 Pop. 2000 Bens 2000 bens Bens. Sup. July - Dec Bens July - Dec Bens ity Estimate of Pop. Estimate % of Pop. Feeding % of pop 1 ASEGEDE TSIMBELA 96,115 111,424 114,766 1 KAFTA HUMERA 48,690 56,445 58,138 1 LAELAY ADIYABO 79,832 92,547 5,590 6% 95,324 7,800 8% 11,300 12% Western 1 MEDEBAY ZANA 97,237 112,724 116,106 2,100 2% 4,180 4% 1 TAHTAY ADIYABO 80,934 93,825 6,420 7% 96,639 18,300 19% 24,047 25% 1 TAHTAY KORARO 83,492 96,790 99,694 2,800 3% 2,800 3% 1 TSEGEDE 59,846 69,378 71,459 1 TSILEMTI 97,630 113,180 37,990 34% 116,575 43,000 37% 15,050 46,074 40% 1 WELKAIT 90,186 104,550 107,687 Sub Total 733,962 850,863 50,000 6% 876,389 74,000 8% 15,050 88,401 10% *2 ABERGELE 58,373 67,670 11,480 17% 69,700 52,200 75% 18,270 67,430 97% *2 ADWA 109,203 126,596 9,940 8% 130,394 39,600 30% 13,860 58,600 45% 2 DEGUA TEMBEN 89,037 103,218 7,360 7% 106,315 34,000 32% 11,900 44,000 41% Central 2 ENTICHO 131,168 152,060 22,850 15% 156,621 82,300 53% 28,805 92,300 59% 2 KOLA TEMBEN 113,712 131,823 12,040 9% 135,778 62,700 46% 21,945 67,700 50% 2 LAELAY MAYCHEW 90,123 104,477 3,840 4% 107,612 19,600 18% 6,860 22,941 21% 2 MEREB LEHE 78,094 90,532 14,900 16% 93,248 57,500 62% 20,125 75,158 81% *2 NAEDER ADET 84,942 98,471 15,000 15% 101,425 40,800 40% 14,280 62,803 62% 2 TAHTAY MAYCHEW 78,562 91,075 10,000 11% 93,807 23,600 25% 8,260 26,100 28% *2 WERIE LEHE 110,636 128,257 14,800 12% 132,105 69,300 52% 24,255 79,100 60% Sub Total 943,850 1,094,181 122,210 11% 1,127,006 481,600 43% 168,560 596,132 53% 3 ATSBI WENBERTA 84,863 98,379 36,730 37% 101,331 53,900 53% 18,865 64,224 63% 3 EROB 17,776 20,607 21,225 0 Eastern 3 GANTA AFESHUM 122,827 142,390 37,390 26% 146,662 45,400 31% 15,890 57,400 39% 3 GULOMAHDA 79,141 91,746 24,970 27% 94,498 0 3 HAWZEN 93,300 108,160 11,320 10% 111,405 61,500 55% 21,525 72,310 65% 3 SAESI TSAEDAEMBA 101,478 117,641 38,890 33% 121,170 53,400 44% 18,690 64,950 54% 3 WUKRO 85,561 99,189 8,230 8% 102,164 41,800 41% 14,630 50,161 49% Sub Total 584,946 678,113 157,530 23% 698,456 256,000 37% 89,600 309,045 44% 4 ALAJE 83,692 97,022 4,840 5% 99,933 23,200 23% 8,120 36,790 37% 4 ALAMATA 93,659 108,576 44,140 41% 111,834 21,800 19% 7,630 41,700 37% 4 ENDAMEHONI 81,657 94,663 6,360 7% 97,503 19,000 19% 6,650 75,062 77% South 4 ENDERTA 105,814 122,667 6,050 5% 126,347 34,600 27% 12,110 51,000 40% 4 HINTALO WAJIRAT 110,926 128,594 9,680 8% 132,451 33,300 25% 11,655 49,100 37% 4 MEKELE 96,938 112,378 115,749 0 4 OFLA 124,484 144,311 54,440 38% 148,640 35,100 24% 12,285 67,700 46% 4 RAYAAZEBO 87,638 101,596 33,070 33% 104,644 38,000 36% 13,300 41,490 40% 4 SAMRE 88,701 102,829 12,100 12% 105,914 30,800 29% 10,780 50,800 48% Sub Total 873,509 1,012,636 170,680 17% 1,043,015 235,800 23% 82,530 413,642 40% TIGRAY TOTAL 3,136,267 3,635,793 500,420 14% 3,744,867 1,047,400 28% 355,740 1,407,220 38% Total displaced beneficiaries 315,936 315,936 Total all beneficiaries 1,363,336 36% 1,723,156 46% UN-EUE July - December 2000 - revised August 2000. Zone 1994 census 1999 beneficiaries - May '99 2000 beneficiaries - Jan 2000 July - Dec 2000 Bens Zone ID/prior Wereda Total Pop. 1999 Pop. 1999 Bens. 1999 bens % 2000 Pop. 2000 Bens 2000 bens Bens. Sup. July - Dec Bens July - Dec Bens ity Estimate of Pop. Estimate % of Pop. Feeding % of pop AMHARA 1 ADDI ARKAY 106,983 124,023 7,500 6% 127,743 31,860 25% 11,151 40,166 31% 1 ALEFA 213,961 248,039 255,481 0 1 BELESA 140,214 162,546 9,860 6% 167,423 45,425 27% 15,899 45,425 27% *1 BEYEDA 76,680 88,893 22,500 25% 91,560 51,573 56% 18,051 53,736 59% 1 CHILGA 166,086 192,539 198,315 0 North Gonder 1 DABAT 118,566 137,450 25,220 18% 141,574 4,000 3% 1,400 11,241 8% 1 DEBARK 120,754 139,987 4,780 3% 144,187 20,000 14% 7,000 23,306 16% 1 DEMBIA 218,014 252,738 260,320 0 1 GONDAR 112,249 130,127 134,031 0 1 GONDAR ZURIA 192,337 222,971 229,660 0 3,348 1% *1 JANAMORA 125,516 145,507 24,480 17% 149,873 44,183 29% 15,464 47,785 32% 1 LAY ARMACHEHO 117,471 136,181 140,267 1 METEMA 54,913 63,659 65,569 1 QUARA 35,600 41,270 42,508 1 SANJA 105,751 122,594 126,272 1 WEGERA 183,589 212,830 21,200 10% 219,215 12,894 6% 25,277 12% Sub Total 2,088,684 2,421,357 115,540 5% 2,493,998 209,935 8% 68,964 250,284 10% 2 DEBRE TABOR 22,455 26,031 26,812 2 DERA 212,341 246,161 253,546 South Gonder 2 EBENAT 163,413 189,440 22,870 12% 195,124 92,812 48% 32,484 92,812 48% 2 ESTE 296,978 344,279 354,607 50,161 14% 56,866 16% 2 FARTA 228,772 265,209 16,666 6% 273,166 71,733 26% 25,107 99,629 36% 2 FOGERA 185,280 214,790 9,780 5% 221,234 18,304 8% 18,304 8% 2 KEMEKEM 220,414 255,520 15,000 6% 263,186 63,042 24% 63,041 24% 2 LAY GAYINT 167,122 193,740 35,000 18% 199,552 103,155 52% 36,104 145,037 73% 2 SIMADA 187,799 217,711 22,510 10% 224,242 56,689 25% 19,841 56,689 25% 2 TACH GAYINT 84,158 97,562 20,040 21% 100,489 48,487 48% 16,970 60,000 60% Sub Total 1,768,732 2,050,445 141,866 7% 2,111,959 504,383 24% 130,507 592,378 28% *3 BUGNA 171,333 198,622 85,960 43% 204,581 67,986 33% 23,795 80,248 39% 3 DAWUNTNA DELANT 145,401 168,560 58,250 35% 173,616 62,136 36% 21,748 101,228 58% *3 GIDAN 135,805 157,435 119,600 76% 162,158 62,356 38% 21,825 88,011 54% N. Wello *3 GUBA LAFTO 139,151 161,314 68,800 43% 166,154 59,325 36% 20,764 84,234 51% 3 HABRU 168,172 194,957 30,250 16% 200,806 53,820 27% 64,316 32% 3 KOBO 175,558 203,520 33,210 16% 209,625 54,236 26% 56,388 27% 3 MEKET 193,683 224,532 55,000 24% 231,268 70,670 31% 24,735 104,401 45% 3 WADLA 106,681 123,673 59,080 48% 127,383 45,328 36% 15,865 77,937 61% 3 WELDIYA 24,533 28,440 29,294 Sub Total 1,260,317 1,461,053 510,150 35% 1,504,884 475,857 32% 128,730 656,763 44% *4 AMBASEL 111,172 128,879 77,578 60% 132,745 66,320 50% 23,212 116,107 87% 4 DEBRESINA 125,126 145,055 69,735 48% 149,407 39,180 26% 71,730 48% 4 DESSIE 97,314 112,814 116,198 4 DESSIE ZURIA 201,433 233,516 141,778 61% 240,522 95,478 40% 170,058 71% 4 JAMA 107,365 124,465 22,658 18% 128,199 15,334 12% 22,000 17% 4 KALU 170,523 197,683 61,912 31% 203,613 56,014 28% 19,605 69,488 34% South Wello 4 KELALA 117,011 135,648 22,020 16% 139,717 33,113 24% 38,910 28% 4 KOMBOLCHA 39,466 45,752 47,124 *4 KUTABER 126,805 147,002 50,810 35% 151,412 49,934 33% 17,477 71,278 47% *4 LEGAMBO 158,785 184,075 99,200 54% 189,598 63,656 34% 22,280 107,194 57% 4 MEKDELA 106,435 123,387 54,979 45% 127,089 51,687 41% 18,090 103,987 82% 4 SAYINT 193,616 224,454 56,342 25% 231,188 73,695 32% 25,793 63,384 27% 4 TEHULEDERE 119,240 138,232 28,426 21% 142,379 22,418 16% 66,357 47% *4 TENTA 137,412 159,298 87,662 55% 164,077 92,919 57% 32,522 123,799 75% 4 WEGDE 101,521 117,691 23,365 20% 121,221 22,826 19% 28,445 23% 4 WERE ILU 120,193 139,337 50,922 37% 143,517 56,564 39% 77,209 54% 4 WEREBABU 90,386 104,782 29,070 28% 107,926 46,726 43% 16,354 55,980 52% Sub Total 2,123,803 2,462,070 876,457 36% 2,535,932 785,864 31% 175,333 1,185,926 47% UN-EUE July - December 2000 - revised August 2000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Epidemiological Study of Bovine Trypanosomosis in Wenbera
    Epidemiological Study Of Bovine Trypanosomosis In Wenbera District, Metekal Zone Of Benishagul Gumuz Regional State, Western Ethiopia [1] Dawit Tesfaye, [1] Tesfa Feleke and [2] Derara Birasa 1 National Tsetse flies and Trypanosomosis Control and Eradication Institute of Ethiopia, Assosa 2 Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, P. O. Box 307, Jimma, Ethiopia Corresponding author: [email protected]; phone: +251910186937/+251910186937 Abstract: Cross-sectional study was conducted in Wanbera district of Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State, Western Ethiopia from February, 2019 to April 2019 to assess the prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis and association risk factors. During this survey, blood samples of 384 randomly selected cattle (Bosindicus) were examined using Buffy coat techniques. The packed cell volume (PCV) value of each animal was measured using hematocrit reader. Descriptive statistics was held to analyze the findings using STATA version 14.0 software packages. Chi square test was used to determine the association between different risk factors (age, sex, Body condition and location) and trypanosomosis infection. Out of 384 cattle examined, 8(2.08%) were found positive for trypanosomosis. The highest prevalence was revealed in Bagondy village 4 (50%) followed by Muz village 3(37.5%) and the lowest was recorded in Zamatiya village 1(12.5%). Trypanosome congolense (75%) was the most dominant trypanosome species identified followed by T. vivax (25%). The mean packed cell volume (PCV) value of infected animals was 17.92%±3.356 for trypanosome positive animals and 27.22%±2.748 for non-infected animals. Similarly, the highest prevalence (87.5%) of trypanosomosis infection was registered in animals with poor body condition score.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report Includes Results from Tigray Response
    Ethiopia Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report Includes results from Tigray Response © UNICEF Ethiopia/2021/Nahom Tesfaye Situation in Numbers Reporting Period: May 2021 12.5 million Highlights children in need of humanitarian assistance (HNO 2021) In May, 56,354 new medical consultations were conducted in Afar, Somali and Tigray regions through the 79 UNICEF- supported Mobile Health and Nutrition Teams (MHNTs), 23.5 million 11,692 of these in Tigray through the 30 active MHNTs. people in need UNICEF reached 412,647 people in May and 2,881,630 (HNO 2021) people between January to May 2021 throughout Ethiopia with safe water for drinking, cooking, and personal hygiene 2 through the rehabilitation of non-functional water systems, 3.6 million water treatment, and water trucking; of these, 1,228,921 were internally displaced people (DTM, in Tigray 2021) Since the beginning of the Tigray crisis, UNICEF has delivered 2,352 metric tons of multi-sectoral supplies to nine 806,541 partners (including Regional Bureaus) working in the region, valued at US$ 4.6 million. registered refugees (UNHCR,31 May 2021) In May, UNICEF supported the treatment of 38,032 under 5 children with Severe Acutely Malnutrition (SAM) in Ethiopia (1,723 in Tigray); 40.6 per cent of these were in Oromia, 20.7 per cent in Somali, 15.4 percent in SNNP/Sidama, 12.7 percent in Amhara and 4.5 per cent in Tigray. A total of UNICEF Revised HAC Appeal 152,413 children in the country have been treated for SAM between January – April 2021 with UNICEF direct support 2021
    [Show full text]
  • From Dust to Dollar Gold Mining and Trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia Borderland
    From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland [Copy and paste completed cover here} Enrico Ille, Mohamed[Copy[Copy and and paste paste Salah completed completed andcover cover here} here} Tsegaye Birhanu image here, drop from 20p5 max height of box 42p0 From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland Enrico Ille, Mohamed Salah and Tsegaye Birhanu Cover image: Gold washers close to Qeissan, Sudan, 25 November 2019 © Mohamed Salah This report is a product of the X-Border Local Research Network, a component of the FCDO’s Cross- Border Conflict—Evidence, Policy and Trends (XCEPT) programme, funded by UKaid from the UK government. The programme carries out research work to better understand the causes and impacts of conflict in border areas and their international dimensions. It supports more effective policymaking and development programming and builds the skills of local partners. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. The Rift Valley Institute works in Eastern and Central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2021. This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE REPORT 2 Contents Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 7 Methodology 9 2. The Blue Nile–Benishangul-Gumuz borderland 12 The two borderland states 12 The international border 14 3. Trade and mobility in the borderlands 16 The administration of trade relations 16 Constraints on mobility 18 Price differentials and borderland trade 20 Borderland relations 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Community Based Ecotourism in Abune Yosef Massif, Northern Ethiopia: Potential, Challenges and Prospects
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES COLLEGE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY BASED ECOTOURISM IN ABUNE YOSEF MASSIF, NORTHERN ETHIOPIA: POTENTIAL, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS A Final Draft Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in Tourism Development and Management BY WUBSHET KASSA ADVISOR: FEYERA SENBETA (Ph.D) JUNE 2018 ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES COLLEGE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY BASED ECOTOURISM IN ABUNE YOSEF MASSIF, NORTHERN ETHIOPIA: POTENTIAL, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS BY WUBSHET KASSA Approval of Board of Examiners Name Signature Date Advisor _________________ _____________ ________________ Internal Examiner ______________ _____________ _________________ External Examiner ________________ _____________ _________________ ii DECLARATION I, the undersigned, declare that this thesis entitled “Development of community based Ecotourism in Abune Yoseph massif, Northern Ethiopia: Potential, Challenges and Prospects” is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University, and all sources of material used for the thesis have been duly acknowledged. Name: Wubshet kassa Signature: _____________ Date : ______________ This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval as University advisor. Name : Feyera Senbeta (PhD) Signature:________________________ Date : __________________________ iii Acknowledgement I would like to thank all my families, friends, collogues and lecturers who have helped and inspired me during my MA study. My first special gratitude goes to Dr. Feyera Senbeta, who was my thesis advisor and whose encouragement, guidance and support from the initial to the final stage enabled me to grasp some know-how on this particular theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotany, Diverse Food Uses, Claimed Health Benefits And
    Shewayrga and Sopade Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2011, 7:19 http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/7/1/19 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Ethnobotany, diverse food uses, claimed health benefits and implications on conservation of barley landraces in North Eastern Ethiopia highlands Hailemichael Shewayrga1* and Peter A Sopade2,3 Abstract Background: Barley is the number one food crop in the highland parts of North Eastern Ethiopia produced by subsistence farmers grown as landraces. Information on the ethnobotany, food utilization and maintenance of barley landraces is valuable to design and plan germplasm conservation strategies as well as to improve food utilization of barley. Methods: A study, involving field visits and household interviews, was conducted in three administrative zones. Eleven districts from the three zones, five kebeles in each district and five households from each kebele were visited to gather information on the ethnobotany, the utilization of barley and how barley end-uses influence the maintenance of landrace diversity. Results: According to farmers, barley is the “king of crops” and it is put for diverse uses with more than 20 types of barley dishes and beverages reportedly prepared in the study area. The products are prepared from either boiled/roasted whole grain, raw- and roasted-milled grain, or cracked grain as main, side, ceremonial, and recuperating dishes. The various barley traditional foods have perceived qualities and health benefits by the farmers. Fifteen diverse barley landraces were reported by farmers, and the ethnobotany of the landraces reflects key quantitative and qualitative traits. Some landraces that are preferred for their culinary qualities are being marginalized due to moisture shortage and soil degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Barley Production in Meket District, Ethiopia
    Vol. 10(10), pp. 328-338, October 2018 DOI: 10.5897/JDAE2018.0960 Article Number: 12FCF3758529 ISSN: 2006-9774 Copyright ©2018 Journal of Development and Agricultural Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JDAE Economics Full Length Research Paper Economic efficiency of smallholder farmers in barley production in Meket district, Ethiopia Getachew Wollie1*, Lemma Zemedu2 and Bosena Tegegn2 1Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Samara University, Ethiopia. 2Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Received 10 May, 2018; Accepted 31 July, 2018 This study analyzed the economic efficiency of smallholder farmers in barley production in the case of Meket district, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. A cross sectional data collected from a sample of 123 barley producers during the 2015/2016 production season was used for the analysis. Two stages random sampling method was used to select sample respondents. The translog functional form was chosen to estimate both production and cost functions and OLS estimation method was applied to identify allocative and economic inefficiencies factors, while technical inefficiency factors were analyzed by using single stage estimation approach. The estimated stochastic production frontier model indicated input variables such as fertilizer, human labor and oxen power as significant variables that increase the quantity of barley output, while barley seed had a negative effect. The estimated mean levels of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of the sample farmers were about 70.9, 68.6 and 48.8%, respectively which revealed the presence of a room to increase their technical, allocative and economic efficiencies level on average by 29.1, 31.4 and 51.2%, respectively with the existing resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordination Meeting (Federal)
    Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordination Meeting (Federal) Date of Meeting April 09, 2021 Time 10:00 AM Minutes prepared by: Cluster Location Webinar chaired by Shelter Cluster Attendees IRC, SWAN, Samaritan's Purse, FIDO, DPO, People in Need (PIN), SCI, IOM, ANE, Dorcas Aid International, ASDEPO, NRC, IOM/RRF, SCA/HEKS-EPER, UNHCR, LWF, MCMDO, WVI, CRS, AIDRO, ZOA, FIDO, NDRMC, ADPC, Islamic Relief, ACAPS, USAID/BHA, CARE Agenda 1. Review of action points of previous meeting 2. Overall response and Pipeline update 3. The current humanitarian situation in country and expectation from ESNFI 4. ESNFI Situation Update and Response in Tigray 5. Emergency Response Mechanisms, how it works 6. HLP assessment in West Tigray Zone AOB 1st round of EHF Agenda and notes. Decisions, issues 1. Review of Action Action Point Further Action Point • Partners should communicate their planned activities to On-going the sub-national Cluster and the regional ECC before addressing the beneficiaries • Partners should report age/sex disaggregated data for On-going completed activities from the actual distribution list, not a calculation of beneficiaries using the average household size. On-going • Partners are encouraged to share sector-specific funding of the year 2021 to the FTS website. The cluster will share the FTS template with link On-going • Coordination with the sub-national Cluster highly encouraged for any response 2. Information Please refer to the Shelter Cluster Presentation for more detail Management Updates(Overall • Response - Overall: In the first quarter of 2021, the cluster through its partners reached response and 357,424 beneficiaries with ESNFI kits, NFI kits, cash for rent and construction of communal Pipeline update) and emergency shelters by considering females, children, and people with different vulnerability.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Journal of Ethnobiology and provided by PubMed Central Ethnomedicine BioMed Central Research Open Access Ethnomedical survey of Berta ethnic group Assosa Zone, Benishangul-Gumuz regional state, mid-west Ethiopia Teferi Flatie1, Teferi Gedif1, Kaleab Asres*2 and Tsige Gebre-Mariam1 Address: 1Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and 2Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Email: Teferi Flatie - [email protected]; Teferi Gedif - [email protected]; Kaleab Asres* - [email protected]; Tsige Gebre- Mariam - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 1 May 2009 Received: 17 June 2008 Accepted: 1 May 2009 Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2009, 5:14 doi:10.1186/1746-4269-5-14 This article is available from: http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/5/1/14 © 2009 Flatie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Traditional medicine (TM) has been a major source of health care in Ethiopia as in most developing countries around the world. This survey examined the extent and factors determining the use of TM and medicinal plants by Berta community. One thousand and two hundred households (HHs) and fourteen traditional healers were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires and six focused group discussions (FGDs) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • From Dust to Dollar Gold Mining and Trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia Borderland
    From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland [Copy and paste completed cover here} Enrico Ille, Mohamed[Copy[Copy and and paste paste Salah completed completed andcover cover here} here} Tsegaye Birhanu image here, drop from 20p5 max height of box 42p0 From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland Enrico Ille, Mohamed Salah and Tsegaye Birhanu Cover image: Gold washers close to Qeissan, Sudan, 25 November 2019 © Mohamed Salah This report is a product of the X-Border Local Research Network, a component of the FCDO’s Cross-Border Conflict Evidence, Policy and Trends (XCEPT) programme, funded by UK aid from the UK government. XCEPT brings together leading experts to examine conflict-affected borderlands, how conflicts connect across borders, and the factors that shape violent and peaceful behaviour. The X-Border Local Research Network carries out research to better understand the causes and impacts of conflict in border areas and their international dimensions. It supports more effective policymaking and development programming and builds the skills of local partners. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. The Rift Valley Institute works in Eastern and Central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2021. This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE REPORT 2 Contents Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 7 Methodology 9 2. The Blue Nile–Benishangul-Gumuz borderland 12 The two borderland states 12 The international border 14 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Interagency Rapid Protection Assessment - Bahir Dar, Amhara Region
    Interagency Rapid Protection Assessment - Bahir Dar, Amhara Region 18-19 December 2018 MISSION OBJECTIVE / PURPOSE: In mid-December 2018, the Protection Cluster was informed of the arrival of approximately 1,200 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) from Kamashi zone in Benishangul-Gumuz region to Bahir Dar in Amhara region. Amhara regional DRM confirmed the numbers and added that an upwards of 200 IDPs continue to arrive Bahir Dar on a daily basis. The IDPs are of Amharic ethnicity, whom have reported instances of GBV and human rights violations, suffered in Kamashi and en route to Bahir Dar. The Protection Cluster conducted an interagency Rapid Protection Assessment between the 18th – 19th December, to better understand the protection needs of the new arrivals to Bahir Dar, as well as the conditions in Kamashi zone. As humanitarian access to Kamashi zone is restricted, the total number of IDPs and conditions in Kamashi, remains largely unknown by the humanitarian community. The aim of a Rapid Protection Assessment is to assist the Protection Cluster and protection agencies to collect relevant information to identify key protection concerns and information gaps according to an agreed common methodology, which included: key informant interviews, focus group discussions and observations. MULTIFUNCTIONAL TEAM MEMBERS: Kristin Arthur Victoria Clancy Protection Cluster Coordinator Child Protection Sub-Cluster Coordinator UNHCR UNICEF Sebena Gashaw Caroline Haar Human Rights Officer GBV Sub-Cluster Coordinator OHCHR UNFPA Ayenew Messele Child
    [Show full text]