DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge: Award Recipients, 1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge: Award Recipients, 1996 The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award Recipients 1996—2016 Contents Introduction...............................................................................................................1 2016 Winners Academic Award: Professor Paul J. Chirik, Princeton University............................................................................................3 Small Business Award: Verdezyne........................ ......................................................................................4 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: CB&I and Albemarle............................................................................................... 5 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Dow AgroSciences LLC..........................................................................................6 Designing Greener Chemicals Award Specific Environmental Benefit: Climate Change Award: Newlight Technologies..........................................................................................7 2015 Winners Academic Award: Professor Eugene Y.-X. Chen, Colorado State University.....................................................................................8 Small Business Award: Renmatix.......................... ......................................................................................9 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: LanzaTech Inc........................... .............................................................................10 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Synthetic Oils and Lubricants of Texas, Inc. (Soltex).......................................... 11 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: Hybrid Coating Technologies/Nanotech Industries............................................12 Specific Environmental Benefit: Climate Change Award: Algenol...................................................................................................................13 2014 Winners Academic Award: Professor Shannon S. Stahl, University of Wisconsin-Madison ......................................................................14 Small Business Award: Amyris............................... .....................................................................................15 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Solazyme, Inc. .......................... .............................................................................16 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: QD Vision, Inc. ......................................................................................................17 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: The Solberg Company...........................................................................................18 Contents iii 2013 Winners Academic Award: Professor Richard P. Wool, University of Delaware .......................................................................................19 Small Business Award: Faraday Technology, Inc....................................................................................... 20 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Life Technologies Corporation ............................................................................21 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: The Dow Chemical Company..............................................................................22 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: Cargill, Inc..............................................................................................................23 2012 Winners Academic Awards: Professor Geoffrey W. Coates, Cornell University .............................................................................................24 Professor Robert M. Waymouth, Stanford University Dr. James L. Hedrick, IBM Almaden Research Center .........................................................................25 Small Business Award: Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc... ..................................................................26 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Codexis, Inc. Professor Yi Tang, University of California, Los Angeles.................................................................27 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Cytec Industries Inc. .............................................................................................28 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: Buckman International, Inc. ................................................................................29 2011 Winners Academic Award: Professor Bruce H. Lipshutz, University of California, Santa Barbara .............................................................30 Small Business Award: BioAmber, Inc.. .....................................................................................................31 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Genomatica .........................................................................................................32 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc......................................................................33 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: The Sherwin-Williams Company .........................................................................34 iv Contents 2010 Winners Academic Award: James C. Liao, Ph.D., Easel Biotechnologies, LLC and University of California, Los Angeles ...............................................................35 Small Business Award: LS9, Inc.. .............................................................................................................36 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: The Dow Chemical Company BASF ...................................................................................................................... 37 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Merck & Co., Inc. Codexis, Inc. ......................................................................................................... 38 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: Clarke ....................................................................................................................39 2009 Winners Academic Award: Professor Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, Carnegie Mellon University ........... ..................................................................40 Small Business Award: Virent Energy Systems, Inc. .................................................................................41 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Eastman Chemical Company ............................................................................. 42 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: CEM Corporation .................................................................................................43 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: The Procter & Gamble Company Cook Composites and Polymers Company........................................................44 2008 Winners Academic Award: Professors Robert E. Maleczka, Jr. and Milton R. Smith, III, Michigan State University .............. ..................................................................45 Small Business Award: SiGNa Chemisty, Inc. ..........................................................................................46 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Battelle ..................................................................................................................47 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Nalco Company ................................................................................................... 48 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: Dow AgroSciences LLC ........................................................................................49 Contents v 2007 Winners Academic Award: Professor Michael J. Krische, University of Texas at Austin ............................................................................ 50 Small Business Award: NovaSterilis Inc. ....................................................................................................51 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Professor Kaichang Li, Oregon State University; Columbia Forest Products Hercules Incorporated (now Ashland Inc.) .....................................................52 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Headwaters Technology Innovation ................................................................... 53 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: Cargill, Incorporated ............................................................................................54 2006 Winners Academic Award: Professor Galen J. Suppes, University of Missouri-Columbia ..................................................................... 55 Small Business Award: Arkon Consultants, NuPro Technologies, Inc. (now Eastman Kodak Company) .....................................................................56 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Merck & Co., Inc. ..................................................................................................57 Greener Reaction Conditions Award: Codexis, Inc. ..................................... ....................................................................58 Designing Greener Chemicals Award: S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. ......................................................................................59 2005 Winners Academic Award: Professor Robin D. Rogers, The University of Alabama ............................................................................... 60 Small Business Award: Metabolix, Inc. .....................................................................................................61 Greener Synthetic Pathways Award: Archer Daniels Midland Company Novozymes ...........................................................................................................62
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Leader Lissa Mccracken Michael Simpson, PE Acting Director Sr
    Project Leader Lissa McCracken Michael Simpson, PE Acting Director Sr. Environmental Engineer Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center City of Los Angeles University of Louisville Department of Public Works Louisville, KY Bureau of Sanitation Industrial Waste Management Division Cam Metcalf (former Director of Kentucky Los Angeles, CA Pollution Prevention Center) National Pollution Prevention Round 2001 Lancashire Ave #208 Table Board Member Louisville, KY Authors * Editors Michelle Butler, PhD* Michelle Butler, PhD* Sr. Pollution Prevention Engineer Sr. Pollution Prevention Engineer NY State Pollution Prevention Institute NY State Pollution Prevention Institute Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York Rochester, New York Al Innes Jonathan M. Rivin, PhD* Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Waste Management Specialist Green Chemistry Coordinator UW Extension-Solid & Hazardous Waste Pollution Prevention Program Education Center St. Paul, MN University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI Lin Kaatz Chary, PhD, MPH Executive Director Cathy Bouge Great Lakes Green Chemistry Network Washington State Gary, IN Department of Ecology Olympia, WA Olga Krel, MS Plancheck Engineer City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Bureau of Sanitation Industrial Waste Management Division Los Angeles, CA Ally LaTourelle, Esq. Managing Partner BioEconomy Partners Philadelphia, PA *Editors Green Chemistry Guide This manual provides state agencies and technical assistance providers with tools and resources
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Bioplastics Alan Fernyhough, October 20Th 2011 Outline: Introduction to Bioplastics
    Introduction to Bioplastics Alan Fernyhough, October 20th 2011 Outline: Introduction to Bioplastics • Petrochemical plastics background • What are bioplastics? • Bioplastic market growth and drivers • The three leading compostable bioplastics − Starches − Celluloses − Compostable Polyesters Petroleum Fuels, Chemicals & Plastics PETROLEUM REFINING FUELS & OILS CRUDE OIL PETCHEM FEEDSTOCKS (~3%) ADDITIVES: chemicals; fillers/fibres CHEMICAL BUILDING COMPOUNDING POLYMERISATION BLOCKS/MONOMERS & PROCESSING extrusion, POLYMERS moulding PE,PP,PVC,PS,PET,.. foaming,.. PLASTIC PRODUCTS Example Monomers & Derived Polymers (Petroleum Refining) Petrochemical / Further Derived Example Polymers Monomer/intermediate Monomer/intermediate Ethylene, propylene PE, PP, .. Vinyl chloride PVC,.. Vinyl acetate PVac; EVA, PVAlc.,. Acrylic acid EAA,... Acrylonitrile SAN, ABS,... Ethylene glycol PET,.. Methyl methacrylate PMMA,... Lower alkenes LLDPE Butadiene ABS, PBD,... Xylenes / alkylated Terephthalic acid PET, PBT, PBAT benzenes (PX) Styrene PS/EPS, SAN, ABS Adipic Acid Nylon 6,6 ; PBAT Butanediol PBS, PBAT What are bioplastics? Two concepts*: 1. Biodegradable/Compostable – end of life functionality 2. Derived from Renewable Resources – start of life : renewable carbon ‘Bioplastics’ Petrochemical Bio-based Compostable Plastics Plastics Renewable plastics PE, PP, PET, PVC,.. PCL, PBS Starch, Cellulosics, Bio-PE, Bio-PET,... PLA, PHB, * European Bioplastics www.european-bioplastics.org Bioplastics Can be polymers that are: − biobased (renewable resource) and
    [Show full text]
  • Worker and Environmentalist Green Chemistry Awareness Training Curriculum
    Worker and Environmentalist Green Chemistry Awareness Training Curriculum The New England Consortium University of Massachusetts Lowell Grant funded by The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant No. 3U45ES006172-18S2, titled: Administrative Supplements to Promote Partnerships For Environmental Public Health.” This Page Intentionally Left Blank ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Principal Investigator: Craig Slatin, Sc.D., MPH Professor Department of Community Health and Sustainability Director, Center for Health Promotion and Research School of Health and Environment University of Massachusetts Lowell Project Director: Paul Morse, MA, BS Project Manager of The New England Consortium Center for Health Promotion and Research School of Health and Environment University of Massachusetts Lowell This curriculum was a collaboration by the following individuals and institutions: Curriculum Coordinator: Tolle Graham, Labor and Environment Coordinator, Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety & Health (MassCOSH) Curriculum Development Team: Melissa Coffin, Research Associate, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production Amy Cannon, Executive Director, Beyond Benign Foundation Claudie Grout, ENVISION Exceptional Instruction Tom Estabrook, Project Manager - Special Projects, The New England Consortium, UMass Lowell Craig Slatin, Professor, Principal Investigator, The New England Consortium, UMass Lowell Joel Tickner, Associate Professor, Project Director – Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, UMass Lowell The curriculum development team wants
    [Show full text]
  • Bioplastics: Biobased Plastics As Renewable And/Or Biodegradable Alternatives to Petroplastics
    BIOPLASTICS: BIOBASED PLASTICS AS RENEWABLE AND/OR BIODEGRADABLE ALTERNATIVES TO PETROPLASTICS 1. Introduction ‘‘Plastics’’ were introduced approximately 100 years ago, and today are one of the most used and most versatile materials. Yet society is fundamentally ambivalent toward plastics, due to their environmental implications, so interest in bioplastics has sparked. According to the petrochemical market information provider ICIS, ‘‘The emergence of bio-feedstocks and bio-based commodity polymers production, in tandem with increasing oil prices, rising consumer consciousness and improving economics, has ushered in a new and exciting era of bioplastics commercialization. However, factors such as economic viability, product quality and scale of operation will still play important roles in determining a bioplastic’s place on the commer- cialization spectrum’’ (1). The annual production of synthetic polymers (‘‘plastics’’), most of which are derived from petrochemicals, exceeds 300 million tons (2), having replaced traditional materials such as wood, stone, horn, ceramics, glass, leather, steel, concrete, and others. They are multitalented, durable, cost effective, easy to process, impervious to water, and have enabled applications that were not possible before the materials’ availability. Plastics, which consist of polymers and additives, are defined by their set of properties such as hardness, density, thermal insulation, electrical isolation, and primarily their resistance to heat, organic solvents, oxidation, and microorgan- isms. There are hundreds of different plastics; even within one type, various grades exist (eg, low viscosity polypropylene (PP) for injection molding, high viscosity PP for extrusion, and mineral-filled grades). Applications for polymeric materials are virtually endless; they are used as construction and building material, for packaging, appliances, toys, and furniture, in cars, as colloids in paints, and in medical applications, to name but a few.
    [Show full text]
  • To Undergraduate Studies in Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Chemical Biology College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, 2011-12
    Guide to Undergraduate Studies in Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and -2012 Chemical Biology College of Chemistry 2011 University of California, Berkeley Academic Calendar 2011-12 Fall Semester 2011 Tele-BEARS Begins April 11 Monday Fee Payment Due August 15 Monday Fall Semester Begins August 18 Thursday Welcome Events August 22-26 Monday-Friday Instruction Begins August 25 Thursday Labor Day Holiday September 5 Monday Veterans Day Holiday November 11 Friday Thanksgiving Holiday November 24-25 Thursday-Friday Formal Classes End December 2 Friday Reading/Review/Recitation Week December 5-9 Monday-Friday Final Examinations December 12-16 Monday-Friday Fall Semester Ends December 16 Friday Winter Holiday December 26-27 Monday-Tuesday New Year’s Holiday December 29-30 Thursday-Friday Spring Semester 2012 Tele-BEARS Begins October 17, 2011 Monday Spring Semester Begins January 10 Tuesday Fee Payment Due January 15 Sunday Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday January 16 Monday Instruction Begins January 17 Tuesday Presidents’ Day Holiday February 20 Monday Spring Recess March 26-30 Monday-Friday César Chávez Holiday March 30 Friday Cal Day To Be Determined Formal Classes End April 27 Friday Reading/Review/Recitation Week April 30-May 4 Monday-Friday Final Examinations May 7-11 Monday-Friday Spring Semester Ends May 11 Friday Summer Sessions 2012 Tele-BEARS Begins February 6 Monday First Six-Week Session May 21-June 29 Monday-Friday Memorial Day Holiday May 28 Monday Ten-Week Session June 4-August 10 Monday-Friday Eight-Week Session June 18-August
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Green Chemistry in Sustainability
    American Chemical Society The Role of Green Chemistry in Sustainability Mary M. Kirchhoff EPA Region 6 QA Conference 19 October 2015 Green Chemistry Green chemistry is the design of chemical products and processes that reduce or eliminate the use and generation of hazardous substances. American Chemical Society 2 Sustainable Development Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Brundtland Commission American Chemical Society 3 Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards • The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge was established to recognize and promote fundamental and innovative chemical technologies that accomplish pollution prevention through source reduction and that are useful to industry. American Chemical Society 4 Award Categories • Greener synthetic pathways • Greener reaction conditions • Design of greener chemicals • Small business • Academic • Specific environmental benefit: Climate change American Chemical Society 5 2015 Award Winner • Ethanol and green crude from algae – Bio-engineered cyanobacteria – High conversion (80%) to ethanol – Ethanol purified via Vapor Compression Steam Stripping – Residual biomass converted to green crude – 70% reduction in CO2 emissions relative to gasoline Algenol American Chemical Society 6 12 Principles 1. Prevention 2. Atom economy 3. Less hazardous chemical syntheses 4. Designing safer chemicals 5. Safer solvents and auxiliaries 6. Energy efficiency 7. Renewable feedstocks 8. Reduce derivatives 9. Catalysis 10.Design for degradation 11.Real-time analysis for pollution prevention 12.Inherently safer chemistry American Chemical Society 7 Principle 1 It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it is formed. American Chemical Society 8 E-factor • Weight of byproducts/weight of desired product – Oil refining 0.1 – Bulk chemicals <15 – Fine chemicals 5-50 – Pharmaceuticals 25-100+ Sheldon, ChemTech, 1994, 24, 38.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Top Picks
    Equity Research 29 March 2015 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks Equity Research Team Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. This research report has been prepared in whole or in part by equity research analysts based outside the US who are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 153. Barclays | 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks 29 March 2015 2 Barclays | 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks FOREWORD A lot has changed since we published our last Global Top Picks in December. The plunge in oil prices and the rise in the US dollar have produced clear beneficiaries in the euro area and Japan, where monetary policy continues to be extremely supportive, providing support for further upside in stock prices. As we argue in our Global Outlook: Oil, the dollar and monetary policy: it’s all (or at least mostly) good , lower inflation as a result of lower oil prices, combined with a stronger dollar, also argues for the Fed to be more cautious about raising rates than it otherwise would have been, allowing risk assets to continue to perform well. Against this continued accommodative backdrop, we raise our price targets for continental European and Japanese equities, forecasting an additional 13% and 9% of total returns from current levels to the end of 2015, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • D 2.1 Background Information and Biorefinery Status, Potential and Sustainability
    Project no.: 241535 – FP7 Project acronym: Star-COLIBRI Project title: Strategic Targets for 2020 – Collaboration Initiative on Biorefineries Instrument: Specific Support Action Thematic Priority: Coordination and support actions D 2.1 Background information and biorefinery status, potential and Sustainability – Task 2.1.2 Market and Consumers; Carbohydrates – Due date of deliverable: March 31, 2010 Start date of project: 01.11.2009 Duration: 24 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UoY Version: 1.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2011) Dissemination level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Star-COLIBRI - Deliverable 2.1 D 2.1 Background information and biorefinery status, potential and Sustainability – Task 2.1.2 Market and Consumers; Carbohydrates – H.L. Bos, P.F.H. Harmsen & E. Annevelink Wageningen UR – Food & Biobased Research Version 18/03/10 Task 2.1.2 Market and Consumers; Carbohydrates 2 Star-COLIBRI - Deliverable 2.1 Content Management summary ............................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Task description
    [Show full text]
  • BIO-BASED SUCCINIC ACID by Sudeep Vaswani (December 2010)
    PEP Review 2010-14 BIO-BASED SUCCINIC ACID By Sudeep Vaswani (December 2010) ABSTRACT In a U.S. Department of Energy report published in 2004, succinic acid was identified as one of the top twelve building-block chemicals that could be produced from renewable feedstocks. Currently, succinic acid uses a petroleum-derived maleic anhydride route for its production, which is both costly and environmentally unfriendly. As a result, there is a growing interest towards discovering a more economical and environmentally cleaner way for its production. One methodology that has been receiving increased attention is the use of bacterial microorganisms. This technology takes advantage of the fermentative capabilities of various microorganisms and utilizes a renewable substrate as a carbon source for acid formation. Succinic acid production from microbial organisms has tremendous potential as a building block for commodity chemicals with applications in several industries. Some of the succinic acid derivatives include: tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,4-butanediol (BDO), succindiamide, succinonitrile, dimethylsuccinate, N-methyl-pyrrolidone, 2-pyrrolidone, and 1,4-diaminobutane. This PEP Review discusses and provides a detailed techno-economic analysis for bio-based succinic acid production with a capacity of 82.7 million lb/year (37,500 mt/yr). Additionally, it covers information regarding genetic engineering mechanisms, regulation of specific enzymes, and purification of succinic acid to provide a cost-competitive alternative to fossil fuels. © SRI Consulting PEP Review 2010-14 A private report by the Process Economics Program Review No. 2010-14 BIO-BASED SUCCINIC ACID by Sudeep Vaswani December 2010 Menlo Park, California 94025 SRIC agrees to assign professionally qualified personnel to the preparation of the Process Economics Program’s reports and will perform the work in conformance with generally accepted professional standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Green Chemistry in Oxidation and Reduction
    International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869 (O) 2454-4698 (P) Volume-7, Issue-7, July 2017 Importance of Green chemistry in oxidation and reduction Richa Khare, Avidha Kulshrestha, Jaya Pandey, Nidhi Singh Abstract– ”Green chemistry‘ the self-explanatory term is a to equip the students with the required set of tools, their branch of chemistry that involves the application of chemical knowledge and the experience to work with it. product and processes in such a way that reduces the generation This helps us in maintaining and enhancing the high quality of of hazardous chemical waste and its release into the provisions of the green and sustainable chemistry to enable environment. It is an intelligent way of doing chemistry in change to low carbon and bio based economy which is which the waste production is minimized, energy is saved and the depletion of natural resources is cut down to some extent. developed on the high quality of pure and transitional Significant efforts have been made towards the development research, its education and the training. Its networking and of new Green Technologies. It‘s Eenefits should reach to the partnerships which is in the framework of the development common man. We can synthesize many organic molecules with (5). the help of green chemistry methods. In this article we are trying to study about and utilization of green chemistry in different Green Chemistry: A Contribution for Sustainable processes mainly oxidation and reduction processes. Development of Society Green chemistry has contributed a lot in the cleansing the Index Terms– Green Synthesis, Green Chemistry, environment and making our planet a beautiful place to live in Oxidation, Reduction .green chemistry has optimized global mass in order to minimize waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Chemistry As a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: a Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students Molly R
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program 5-1-2015 Green Chemistry as a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: A Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students Molly R. Blessing University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Part of the Analytical Chemistry Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Environmental Chemistry Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Inorganic Chemistry Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Medicinal- Pharmaceutical Chemistry Commons, Organic Chemistry Commons, Other Chemistry Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Polymer Chemistry Commons, Radiochemistry Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons, and the Science and Technology Policy Commons Recommended Citation Blessing, Molly R., "Green Chemistry as a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: A Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students" (2015). Honors Scholar Theses. 449. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/449 Green Chemistry as a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: A Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students Molly Blessing Honors Scholar Thesis Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269, United States May 2015 2 Abstract The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) is the central form of chemical regulation existent in the United States today, yet scientists are often unaware or uncertain of its provisions. Violations of TSCA by unknowing chemists set industry and government unnecessarily at odds. A lecture on TSCA was developed for undergraduate students that uses the concept of green chemistry to promote interest and incentivize learning. Green chemistry methods are cleaner and less wasteful than traditional chemical ones, and many companies using them are at the forefront of technological innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Industrial Roots of Green Chemistry - II
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia Feature Article Early Industrial Roots of Green Chemistry - II. International “Pollution Prevention” Efforts Citation: M.A. Murphy (2020) Early Industrial Roots of Green Chemistry - During the 1970’s and 1980’s II. International “Pollution Prevention” Efforts During the 1970’s and 1980’s. Substantia 4(2): 15-57. doi: 10.13128/ Substantia-894 Mark A. Murphy Received: Apr 03, 2020 UVLAW Patents LLC, 171 China Creek Rd., Blowing Rock North Carolina 28605, USA E-mail: [email protected] Revised: May 15, 2020 Just Accepted Online: May 30, 2020 Abstract. Many literature articles and/or conventional histories of “Green Chemis- try” describe its start as being a result of actions at the US Environmental Protection Published: Sep 12, 2020 Agency (“EPA”) and/or in Academia during the 1990’s. But many examples of environ- Copyright: © 2020 M.A. Murphy. This mentally friendly Real-World chemical processes were invented, developed and com- is an open access, peer-reviewed arti- mercialized in the oil refining, commodity chemical, and consumer product industries cle published by Firenze University starting about the time of World War II. Those efforts dramatically accelerated and Press (http://www.fupress.com/substan- evolved into explicitly environmentally oriented “Pollution Prevention” efforts during tia) and distributed under the terms the 1970’s and 1980’s. A UN conference in November 1976 brought together over 150 of the Creative Commons Attribution attendees from industry, academia, and governmental and non-governmental organiza- License, which permits unrestricted tions from 30 countries to address environmental issues related to preventing pollution use, distribution, and reproduction caused by the chemically-related industries.
    [Show full text]