Bioplastics: Biobased Plastics As Renewable And/Or Biodegradable Alternatives to Petroplastics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bioplastics: Biobased Plastics As Renewable And/Or Biodegradable Alternatives to Petroplastics BIOPLASTICS: BIOBASED PLASTICS AS RENEWABLE AND/OR BIODEGRADABLE ALTERNATIVES TO PETROPLASTICS 1. Introduction ‘‘Plastics’’ were introduced approximately 100 years ago, and today are one of the most used and most versatile materials. Yet society is fundamentally ambivalent toward plastics, due to their environmental implications, so interest in bioplastics has sparked. According to the petrochemical market information provider ICIS, ‘‘The emergence of bio-feedstocks and bio-based commodity polymers production, in tandem with increasing oil prices, rising consumer consciousness and improving economics, has ushered in a new and exciting era of bioplastics commercialization. However, factors such as economic viability, product quality and scale of operation will still play important roles in determining a bioplastic’s place on the commer- cialization spectrum’’ (1). The annual production of synthetic polymers (‘‘plastics’’), most of which are derived from petrochemicals, exceeds 300 million tons (2), having replaced traditional materials such as wood, stone, horn, ceramics, glass, leather, steel, concrete, and others. They are multitalented, durable, cost effective, easy to process, impervious to water, and have enabled applications that were not possible before the materials’ availability. Plastics, which consist of polymers and additives, are defined by their set of properties such as hardness, density, thermal insulation, electrical isolation, and primarily their resistance to heat, organic solvents, oxidation, and microorgan- isms. There are hundreds of different plastics; even within one type, various grades exist (eg, low viscosity polypropylene (PP) for injection molding, high viscosity PP for extrusion, and mineral-filled grades). Applications for polymeric materials are virtually endless; they are used as construction and building material, for packaging, appliances, toys, and furniture, in cars, as colloids in paints, and in medical applications, to name but a few. Plastics can be shaped into films, fibers, tubes, plates, and objects such as bottles or boxes. They are sometimes the best available technology. Many plastic products are intended for a short-term use, and others have long-term applications (eg, plastic pipes, which are designed for lifetimes in excess of 100 yr). On the other hand, there is a growing debate about crude oil depletion and price volatility, and environmental concerns with plastics are becoming more serious. Approximately half of all synthetic polymers end up in short-lived products, which are partly thermally recycled (burnt), but to some extent end up on landfills or, worse, in the oceans, where large plastic objects are washed ashore, sink or float (eg, the ‘‘North Pacific Garbage Patch,’’ which has continental dimensions), and get fragmented to ‘‘microplastics’’ (particles between a few mm and <5 mm) that harm and kill various organisms, finally ending up on our plates. It is estimated that globally some 900 billion plastic bags (shopping bags, waste bags, etc) are produced each year, with a typical average useful life of only a few minutes and a significant fraction of them ending up as litter in the environment (3), having wasted energy, spoiling the scene, and seriously harming wildlife. 1 Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Copyright # 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1002/0471238961.koe00006 2 BIOPLASTICS: BIOBASED PLASTICS AS RENEWABLE It is estimated that since the 1950s, approximately 1 billion tons of plastics have been discarded and some of that material might persist for centuries or even significantly longer, as it is demonstrated by the persistence of natural materials such as amber (4). One of the biggest advantages of plastics, their durability, is likewise one of their biggest problems: The rate of degradation (biodegradation) does not match their intended service life, and buildup in the environment occurs. Recycling of waste plastics, in principle, a meaningful approach, can follow different routes: 1. Reuse of the product (eg, a bag). 2. Material recycling (collection, sorting, and reprocessing). 3. Feedstock recycling (depolymerization to capture the monomers). 4. Thermal recycling (use of the energy content in waste incineration, steel works, or cement kilns). Recycling plastics is not always feasible, and it can have a negative eco- balance due to the efforts for collecting, sorting, and processing them. In most cases, they need to be washed, and waste grinding and processing are energy consuming. The recycling rate of plastics differs from country to country; there are also differences in the plastics concerned. In the United States, the recycling rate for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packaging (bottles) was 31.2% in 2013 (5). PET has the highest value of commodity plastics and is used mainly for drinking bottles; hence, efforts are made to collect it. Recycled plastics go through different processing steps such as sorting and melt filtration. They can often only be used in lower grade products, typically not with direct food contact or high performance applications. A ‘‘usage cascade’’ can be created, ending in thermal recycling (combustion: incineration or pyrolysis). To summarize, the extensive use of plastics has become a problem in many aspects. Therefore, growing interest in ‘‘bioplastics’’ is observed (for reuse and recycling of bioplastics, an unsolved issue, see Reference 6 and Section 9). The term ‘‘bioplastics’’ stands for ‘‘biobased polymers.’’ According to IUPAC, a bioplastic is derived from ‘‘biomass or . monomers derived from the biomass and which, at some stage in its processing into finished products, can be shaped by flow’’ (7). In the area of bioplastics, several terms are used vaguely, ambiguously, or wrongly. Hence, some important definitions are provided as follows (see also Reference 7). Plastics (plastic materials) in general are a huge range of organic solids that are malleable (pliable, moldable). Malleability is a material’s ability to deform under compressive stress. Plastics usually consist of organic polymers with high molecular weight and other substances (fillers, colors, and additives). They are typically synthetically produced. The term ‘‘natural plastics’’ is some- times used in the industry for unfilled and uncolored plastics, as opposed to compounds. Often, the expression bioplastics is used to make a distinction from polymers derived from fossil resources (monomers). The term is, to some extent, misleading, BIOPLASTICS: BIOBASED PLASTICS AS RENEWABLE 3 as the prefix ‘‘bio’’ suggests that any polymer derived from biomass is environ- ment-friendly. Biobased polymers are neither necessarily biocompatible nor biodegradable. According to industry association European Bioplastics, bioplastics are ‘‘polymers that are biobased, biodegradable, or both’’ (8). So the industry has adopted a rather large definition. An alternative expression could be ‘‘technical biopolymers.’’ In case polymers are obtained from agro-resources such as polysaccharides (eg, starch) (9), one can talk about ‘‘agro-polymers.’’ ‘‘Biomaterials’’ denote materials that are exploited in contact with living tissues, organisms, or microorganisms. Hence, ‘‘polymeric biomaterials’’ are used in applications such as medicine (catheters, bone cements, and contact lenses) (10). Many of them are conventionally produced polymers. Implantable biomaterials are PET, PP, PEEK (polyetheretherketone), UHMWPE (ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene), and PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) (11,12), on the one hand, and (bio-)resorbable polymersPGA (polyglycolide), PLA (polylac- tide), PCL (polycaprolactone), and PGS (poly(glycerol sebacate)), on the other hand (12,13). Generally, a polymer is a substance composed of macromolecules. A macromolecule is a very large molecule commonly made by polymerization of smaller subunits. In biochemistry, the term is applied to the main biopolymers such as nucleic acids (eg, DNA), proteins, and carbohydrates (natural polymers), plus other large, nonpolymeric molecules such as lipids and polyphenols. Natural polymers (‘‘biopolymers’’) can be organic or inorganic (14), the latter having a skeleton devoid of carbon (15). Examples for the former include cellulose, starch, latex, and chitin; examples for the latter include polyphosphazenes, polysilicates, polysiloxanes, polysilanes, polysilazanes, polygermanes, and polysulfides. In between, one can find so-called hybrid polymers, ie, polymers containing inorganic and organic components such as polydimethylsiloxane (silicone rubber: ÀÀ[OÀÀSi (CH3)2]nÀÀ). Synthetic polymers (artificial polymers) are man-made polymers. They are built from monomers by polymerization, polycondensation, or polyaddition. Most synthetic polymers have significantly simpler and more random (stochastic) structures than natural ones. They show a molecular mass distribution, which does not exist in biopolymers (polydispersity vs monodispersity). They are sub- stances that are not produced by nature (xenobiotics). Due to their high molecular weight, they are not mobile. From a practical processing point of view, synthetic polymers can be classified into the four main categories: thermoplastics (thermo- softening plastics), thermosets (duromers), elastomers, and synthetic fibers. The most common synthetic polymers are polyethylene (PE: PE-HD and PE-LD, with HD being high density and LD being low density); polypropylene; acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS); polyethylene terephthalate; polycarbonate
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
    polymers Review A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds M. Sai Bhargava Reddy 1 , Deepalekshmi Ponnamma 2 , Rajan Choudhary 3,4,5 and Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni 2,* 1 Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad 500085, India; [email protected] 2 Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar; [email protected] 3 Rudolfs Cimdins Riga Biomaterials Innovations and Development Centre of RTU, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Institute of General Chemical Engineering, Riga Technical University, Pulka St 3, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia; [email protected] 4 Baltic Biomaterials Centre of Excellence, Headquarters at Riga Technical University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia 5 Center for Composite Materials, National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”, 119049 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material is able to colonize host cells sufficiently to meet up the requirements of regeneration and repair. This process is multi-stage and requires the development of various components to create the desired neo-tissue or organ. In several current TE strategies, biomaterials are essential compo- nents. While several polymers are established for their use as biomaterials, careful consideration of the cellular environment and interactions needed is required in selecting a polymer for a given Citation: Reddy, M.S.B.; Ponnamma, application.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Bioplastics Alan Fernyhough, October 20Th 2011 Outline: Introduction to Bioplastics
    Introduction to Bioplastics Alan Fernyhough, October 20th 2011 Outline: Introduction to Bioplastics • Petrochemical plastics background • What are bioplastics? • Bioplastic market growth and drivers • The three leading compostable bioplastics − Starches − Celluloses − Compostable Polyesters Petroleum Fuels, Chemicals & Plastics PETROLEUM REFINING FUELS & OILS CRUDE OIL PETCHEM FEEDSTOCKS (~3%) ADDITIVES: chemicals; fillers/fibres CHEMICAL BUILDING COMPOUNDING POLYMERISATION BLOCKS/MONOMERS & PROCESSING extrusion, POLYMERS moulding PE,PP,PVC,PS,PET,.. foaming,.. PLASTIC PRODUCTS Example Monomers & Derived Polymers (Petroleum Refining) Petrochemical / Further Derived Example Polymers Monomer/intermediate Monomer/intermediate Ethylene, propylene PE, PP, .. Vinyl chloride PVC,.. Vinyl acetate PVac; EVA, PVAlc.,. Acrylic acid EAA,... Acrylonitrile SAN, ABS,... Ethylene glycol PET,.. Methyl methacrylate PMMA,... Lower alkenes LLDPE Butadiene ABS, PBD,... Xylenes / alkylated Terephthalic acid PET, PBT, PBAT benzenes (PX) Styrene PS/EPS, SAN, ABS Adipic Acid Nylon 6,6 ; PBAT Butanediol PBS, PBAT What are bioplastics? Two concepts*: 1. Biodegradable/Compostable – end of life functionality 2. Derived from Renewable Resources – start of life : renewable carbon ‘Bioplastics’ Petrochemical Bio-based Compostable Plastics Plastics Renewable plastics PE, PP, PET, PVC,.. PCL, PBS Starch, Cellulosics, Bio-PE, Bio-PET,... PLA, PHB, * European Bioplastics www.european-bioplastics.org Bioplastics Can be polymers that are: − biobased (renewable resource) and
    [Show full text]
  • The Recent Developments in Biobased Polymers Toward
    polymers Review The Recent Developments in Biobased Polymers toward General and Engineering Applications: Polymers that Are Upgraded from Biodegradable Polymers, Analogous to Petroleum-Derived Polymers, and Newly Developed Hajime Nakajima, Peter Dijkstra and Katja Loos * ID Macromolecular Chemistry and New Polymeric Materials, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (H.N.); [email protected] (P.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-50-363-6867 Received: 31 August 2017; Accepted: 18 September 2017; Published: 18 October 2017 Abstract: The main motivation for development of biobased polymers was their biodegradability, which is becoming important due to strong public concern about waste. Reflecting recent changes in the polymer industry, the sustainability of biobased polymers allows them to be used for general and engineering applications. This expansion is driven by the remarkable progress in the processes for refining biomass feedstocks to produce biobased building blocks that allow biobased polymers to have more versatile and adaptable polymer chemical structures and to achieve target properties and functionalities. In this review, biobased polymers are categorized as those that are: (1) upgrades from biodegradable polylactides (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), and others; (2) analogous to petroleum-derived polymers such as bio-poly(ethylene terephthalate) (bio-PET); and (3) new biobased polymers such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate)
    [Show full text]
  • Global Top Picks
    Equity Research 29 March 2015 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks Equity Research Team Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. This research report has been prepared in whole or in part by equity research analysts based outside the US who are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 153. Barclays | 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks 29 March 2015 2 Barclays | 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks FOREWORD A lot has changed since we published our last Global Top Picks in December. The plunge in oil prices and the rise in the US dollar have produced clear beneficiaries in the euro area and Japan, where monetary policy continues to be extremely supportive, providing support for further upside in stock prices. As we argue in our Global Outlook: Oil, the dollar and monetary policy: it’s all (or at least mostly) good , lower inflation as a result of lower oil prices, combined with a stronger dollar, also argues for the Fed to be more cautious about raising rates than it otherwise would have been, allowing risk assets to continue to perform well. Against this continued accommodative backdrop, we raise our price targets for continental European and Japanese equities, forecasting an additional 13% and 9% of total returns from current levels to the end of 2015, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • D 2.1 Background Information and Biorefinery Status, Potential and Sustainability
    Project no.: 241535 – FP7 Project acronym: Star-COLIBRI Project title: Strategic Targets for 2020 – Collaboration Initiative on Biorefineries Instrument: Specific Support Action Thematic Priority: Coordination and support actions D 2.1 Background information and biorefinery status, potential and Sustainability – Task 2.1.2 Market and Consumers; Carbohydrates – Due date of deliverable: March 31, 2010 Start date of project: 01.11.2009 Duration: 24 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UoY Version: 1.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2011) Dissemination level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Star-COLIBRI - Deliverable 2.1 D 2.1 Background information and biorefinery status, potential and Sustainability – Task 2.1.2 Market and Consumers; Carbohydrates – H.L. Bos, P.F.H. Harmsen & E. Annevelink Wageningen UR – Food & Biobased Research Version 18/03/10 Task 2.1.2 Market and Consumers; Carbohydrates 2 Star-COLIBRI - Deliverable 2.1 Content Management summary ............................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Task description
    [Show full text]
  • 35Cl NQR Study of Cation Polarizability in Metal Salts of Monochloro Acetic Acid
    Vol. 113 (2008) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A No. 6 35Cl NQR Study of Cation Polarizability in Metal Salts of Monochloro Acetic Acid D. Ramanandaa;¤, L. Ramub, K.P. Rameshc, R. Chandramanib and J. Uchild aDepartment of Materials Science, Mangalore University Karnataka 574199, India bDepartment of Physics, Bangalore University Bangalore 560 006, India cDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012, India dDepartment of PG studies in Physics, SBMJ College Bangalore, India (Received November 2, 2007; in ¯nal form March 3, 2008) Various metal salts (Na, K, Rb, and NH4) of monochloro acetic acid were prepared and the 35Cl nuclear quadrupole resonance frequencies were measured at room temperature. A comparative study of nuclear quadrupole resonance frequencies of monochloro acetic acid and its metal salts is carried out. The frequency shifts obtained in the respective metal chloroacetates are used to estimate the changes in the ionicity of C{Cl bond. Further, the changes in the ionicity of C{Cl bond were used to estimate the percentage of intra-molecular charge transfer between respective cation{anion of the metal salts of chloro acetic acid. The nuclear quadrupole resonance frequency is found to decrease with increasing ionicity of the alkali metal ion. PACS numbers: 76.60.Gv 1. Introduction The aim of the present work is to ¯nd a correlation between the 35Cl nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) frequency and the cation polarizability. Various crys- ¡ + talline metal salts of monochloro acetic acid of general formula, CH2ClCOO M (M = Na, K, Rb, NH4) are obtained by the replacement of hydrogen atom in the chloro acetic acid by metal ions such as sodium/potassium/rubidium and ammo- nium.
    [Show full text]
  • BIO-BASED SUCCINIC ACID by Sudeep Vaswani (December 2010)
    PEP Review 2010-14 BIO-BASED SUCCINIC ACID By Sudeep Vaswani (December 2010) ABSTRACT In a U.S. Department of Energy report published in 2004, succinic acid was identified as one of the top twelve building-block chemicals that could be produced from renewable feedstocks. Currently, succinic acid uses a petroleum-derived maleic anhydride route for its production, which is both costly and environmentally unfriendly. As a result, there is a growing interest towards discovering a more economical and environmentally cleaner way for its production. One methodology that has been receiving increased attention is the use of bacterial microorganisms. This technology takes advantage of the fermentative capabilities of various microorganisms and utilizes a renewable substrate as a carbon source for acid formation. Succinic acid production from microbial organisms has tremendous potential as a building block for commodity chemicals with applications in several industries. Some of the succinic acid derivatives include: tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,4-butanediol (BDO), succindiamide, succinonitrile, dimethylsuccinate, N-methyl-pyrrolidone, 2-pyrrolidone, and 1,4-diaminobutane. This PEP Review discusses and provides a detailed techno-economic analysis for bio-based succinic acid production with a capacity of 82.7 million lb/year (37,500 mt/yr). Additionally, it covers information regarding genetic engineering mechanisms, regulation of specific enzymes, and purification of succinic acid to provide a cost-competitive alternative to fossil fuels. © SRI Consulting PEP Review 2010-14 A private report by the Process Economics Program Review No. 2010-14 BIO-BASED SUCCINIC ACID by Sudeep Vaswani December 2010 Menlo Park, California 94025 SRIC agrees to assign professionally qualified personnel to the preparation of the Process Economics Program’s reports and will perform the work in conformance with generally accepted professional standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Continuous 3D Printing of Customizable Peripheral Nerve Guidance
    Materials Today d Volume xxx, Number xx d xxxx 2017 RESEARCH Rapid continuous 3D printing of customizable peripheral nerve guidance conduits RESEARCH: Original Research Wei Zhu 1,†, Kathryn R. Tringale 2,3,†, Sarah A. Woller 4, Shangting You 1, Susie Johnson 2,3, Haixu Shen 1, Jacob Schimelman 1, Michael Whitney 2,3, Joanne Steinauer 4, Weizhe Xu 5, Tony L. Yaksh 4, Quyen T. Nguyen 2,3,⇑, Shaochen Chen 1,5,⇑ 1 Department of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States 2 Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States 3 Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States 4 Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States 5 Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States Engineered nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have been demonstrated for repairing peripheral nerve injuries. However, there remains a need for an advanced biofabrication system to build NGCs with complex architectures, tunable material properties, and customizable geometrical control. Here, a rapid continuous 3D-printing platform was developed to print customizable NGCs with unprecedented resolution, speed, flexibility, and scalability. A variety of NGC designs varying in complexity and size were created including a life-size biomimetic branched human facial NGC. In vivo implantation of NGCs with microchannels into complete sciatic nerve transections of mouse models demonstrated the effective directional guidance of regenerating sciatic nerves via branching into the microchannels and extending toward the distal end of the injury site.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Chemistry As a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: a Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students Molly R
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program 5-1-2015 Green Chemistry as a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: A Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students Molly R. Blessing University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Part of the Analytical Chemistry Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Environmental Chemistry Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Inorganic Chemistry Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Medicinal- Pharmaceutical Chemistry Commons, Organic Chemistry Commons, Other Chemistry Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Polymer Chemistry Commons, Radiochemistry Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons, and the Science and Technology Policy Commons Recommended Citation Blessing, Molly R., "Green Chemistry as a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: A Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students" (2015). Honors Scholar Theses. 449. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/449 Green Chemistry as a Tool for Understanding the Toxic Substances Control Act: A Lecture Module for Undergraduate Students Molly Blessing Honors Scholar Thesis Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269, United States May 2015 2 Abstract The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) is the central form of chemical regulation existent in the United States today, yet scientists are often unaware or uncertain of its provisions. Violations of TSCA by unknowing chemists set industry and government unnecessarily at odds. A lecture on TSCA was developed for undergraduate students that uses the concept of green chemistry to promote interest and incentivize learning. Green chemistry methods are cleaner and less wasteful than traditional chemical ones, and many companies using them are at the forefront of technological innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biocompatibility of a Synthetic Biopolymer for the Treatment Of
    perim Ex en l & ta a l ic O p in l h t C h f Journal of Clinical & Experimental a o Sarfare et al., J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015, 6:5 l m l a o n l r o DOI: 10.4172/2155-9570.1000475 g u y o J Ophthalmology ISSN: 2155-9570 ResearchResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Biocompatibility of a Synthetic Biopolymer for the Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Shanta Sarfare1*, Yann Dacquay1, Syed Askari2, Steven Nusinowitz1 and Jean-Pierre Hubschman1 1Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA 2Medicus Biosciences, 2528 Qume Drive, Unit 1, San José, California 95131, USA Abstract Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the retinal safety and toxicity of a novel synthetic biopolymer to be used as a patch to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: Thirty one adult wild type albino mice were divided in 2 groups. In Group A (n=9) 0.2 µl balanced salt solution (BSS) and in Group B (n=22), 0.2 µl biopolymer was injected in the subretinal space. Trans-scleral subretinal injection was performed in one eye and the fellow eye was used as control. In both groups, in vivo color fundus photography, electroretinogram (ERG), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed before injection and at days 7 and 14 post-intervention. Histological analysis was performed following euthanization at days 1, 7 and 21 post-injection. Results: The biopolymer was visualized in the subretinal space in vivo by SD-OCT and post-life by histology up to 1 week after the injection.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaffolds with Tunable Properties Constituted by Electrospun Nanofibers of Polyglycolide and Poly(Ε-Caprolactone)
    SCAFFOLDS WITH TUNABLE PROPERTIES CONSTITUTED BY ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBERS OF POLYGLYCOLIDE AND POLY( ε-CAPROLACTONE) Ina Keridou1, Lourdes Franco1,2, Pau Turon3, Luis J. del Valle1,2 1,2* Jordi Puiggalí 1Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est-EEBE, c/Eduard Maristany 10-14, Barcelona 08019, SPAIN 2Center for Research in Nano-Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Campus Sud, Edifici C’, c/Pasqual i Vila s/n, Barcelona E-08028, SPAIN 3B. Braun Surgical, S.A. Carretera de Terrasa 121, 08191 Rubí (Barcelona), SPAIN Correspondence to: J. Puiggalí (E-mail: [email protected]) 1 ABSTRACT Electrospun scaffolds constituted by different mixtures of two biodegradable polyesters have been prepared. Specifically, materials with well differentiated properties can be derived from the blending of hydrophilic polyglycolide (PGA) and hydrophobic poly(ε- caprolactone) (PCL), which are also two of the most applied polymers for biomedical uses. Electrospinning conditions have been selected in order to get homogeneous and continuous fibers with diameters in the nano/micrometric range. These conditions were also applied to load the different scaffolds with curcumin (CUR) and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) as hydrophobic and hydrophilic bactericide compounds, respectively. Physicochemical characterization of both unloaded and loaded scaffolds was performed and involved FTIR and 1H NMR spectroscopies, morphological observations by scanning electron microscopy, study of thermal properties through calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis and evaluation of surface characteristics through contact angle measurements. Release behavior of the loaded scaffolds was evaluated in two different media. Results pointed out a well differentiated behavior where the delivery of CUR and even PHMB were highly dependent on the PGA/PCL ratio, the capability of the medium to swell the polymer matrix and the diffusion of the selected solvent into the electrospun fibers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellulose Nanofibers and Other Biopolymers for Biomedical
    applied sciences Review Cellulose Nanofibers and Other Biopolymers for Biomedical Applications. A Review John Moohan 1, Sarah A. Stewart 1, Eduardo Espinosa 2 , Antonio Rosal 3, Alejandro Rodríguez 2 , Eneko Larrañeta 1 , Ryan F. Donnelly 1 and Juan Domínguez-Robles 1,* 1 School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (S.A.S.); [email protected] (E.L.); [email protected] (R.F.D.) 2 Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Science, University of Córdoba, Building Marie-Curie, Campus of Rabanales, 14014 Córdoba, Spain; [email protected] (E.E.); [email protected] (A.R.) 3 Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering Department, University Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)28-9097-2360 Received: 30 October 2019; Accepted: 16 December 2019; Published: 20 December 2019 Abstract: Biopolymers are materials synthesised or derived from natural sources, such as plants, animals, microorganisms or any other living organism. The use of these polymers has grown significantly in recent years as industry shifts away from unsustainable fossil fuel resources and looks towards a softer and more sustainable environmental approach. This review article covers the main classes of biopolymers: Polysaccharides, proteins, microbial-derived and lignin. In addition, an overview of the leading biomedical applications of biopolymers is also provided, which includes tissue engineering, medical implants, wound dressings, and the delivery of bioactive molecules. The future clinical applications of biopolymers are vast, due to their inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability and low immunogenicity.
    [Show full text]