Implement Iqaluit Airport Master Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Implement Iqaluit Airport Master Plan Airports for Nunavummiut and Their Economy—An Investmant Strategy for Nunavut Executive Summary AIRPORTS FOR NUNAVUMMIUT AND THEIR ECONOMY: An Airport Investment Strategy for Nunavut presents a Vision for Airports in Nunavut, and a plan-of-action to achieve this Vision. Our Vision includes: S Implementation of the Iqaluit Master Plan including new Air Terminal Building S Cambridge Bay Runway paving and rehabilitation of graded areas S Relocation and construction of new Pangnirtung Airport S Apron expansion and improved Instrument Landing System (ILS) at Rankin Inlet Airport S Planning/engineering studies for other airport improvements The improvements to airports as envisaged in AIRPORTS FOR NUNAVUMMIUT AND THEIR ECONOMY: An Airport Investment Strategy for Nunavut are estimated to cost $97.6 million over a 4 year period beginning in 2005/06 (Table 1 next page). These improvements will provide Nunavummiut with a safer, more efficient and effective air transportation system. These improvements will also support Nunavummiut efforts to build a healthy and prosperous society and play their part in the day- to-day social and economic life of Canada. The proposed improvements to Nunavut airports will also enable many more Canadians to see and realize the potential of this vast land and its people. These improvements will also bring some demonstrable proof of Canada’s sovereignty and interest in Canada’s north. 1 Airports for Nunavummiut and Their Economy—An Investment Strategy for Nunavut Table 1 Investment Needs (million $) Project 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Total Iqaluit Airport 10 10 10 10 40 Master Plan Cambridge Bay 4 6 6 2 18 Runway & Graded Areas New Pangnirtung 4.6 10 10 10 34.6 Airport Rankin Inlet ILS and 0 0 1.5 1.5 3 Apron Expansion Other 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 TOTAL 19.1 26.5 28 24 97.6 2 Airports for Nunavummiut and Their Economy—An Investment Strategy for Nunavut The Vision Our Vision for Airports in Nunavut is based upon providing good air system access to all communities to support the growth of healthy communities. Healthy communities require safe transportation services. Our Vision also recognizes that the state of infra- structure at certain airports (hubs) impacts on how the entire system can operate while at other airports the impact is more local- ized. Our Vision includes: S Implementation of the Iqaluit Master Plan including a new Air Terminal Building S Cambridge Bay Runway paving and rehabilitation of graded areas S Relocation and construction of new Pangnirtung Airport S Apron expansion and improved Instrument Landing System (ILS) at Rankin Inlet Airport S Planning/engineering studies for airport improvements This Vision will: S Provide reliable, safe and cost effective airports S Create opportunities for economic development S Make our air transportation system more integrated and efficient S Further the objectives of the Bathurst Mandate Our guiding principles in implementing this Vision are: S Compliance with International (ICAO) and National (Transport Canada) standards S Full observance of NNI - Nunavut’s Contracting/Business Incentive Policy S Ensure every project has a training budget for Nunavummiut S Environment impacts will be considered and minimized S Full consultations with affected communities and stakeholders 3 Airports for Nunavummiut and Their Economy—An Investment Strategy for Nunavut The Potential Nunavut is a beautiful and largely unspoiled land. The benefits of a negotiated land claim settlement and a new political system have poised this culturally and naturally rich territory ready to build a healthy and prosperous society. The establishment of Nunavut as the newest member of the Canadian Confederation has created new possibilities and new expec- tations – both for Nunavummiut and for all Canadians. Nunavummiut are anxious to play their part in the day-to-day social and economic life of Canada. Entry into the Canadian socio-economic mainstream will require the air transportation system and sup- porting airports to evolve and overcome many and varying factors, which currently limit this system’s efficiency and effectiveness. Overcoming these factors offer great potential to make the lives of Nunavummiut better now and in the future for their children. Lowering the Cost of Living Nunavummiut are generally dependent on air cargo during significant portions of the year and exclusively for their perishable goods year round. All “food mail” for communities is brought in via air cargo. The reliability and cost of this supply chain link is de- pendent on airports that can accommodate the aircraft used by Nunavut air carriers without penalty/weight restrictions due to run- way length, surface type or navaids. The absence of any weight penalties due to airport infrastructure also ensures that passenger airfares to and from a community are developed on the basis of full carrying capacity of the airplane versus a reduced or penalized capacity. Full loads may also re- duce the chances of passengers being stranded due to restricted loads. Economic Development The contribution of airports to the general economy of a city or region is well documented. Typically airport activity and related em- ployment and investment opportunities are derived from the air carriers themselves and their related passenger and cargo opera- tions, general aviation operators, aircraft maintenance, flight catering, air navigation services and airport commercial activities among others. A recent study conducted by LPS Aviation for a new Iqaluit Air Terminal Building found that air transportation is one of the largest private sector employers in Iqaluit and in Nunavut. It also established that the private sector could proceed with $10 million of addi- tional investment if the Iqaluit Master Plan was to proceed. 4 Alert Eureka Grise Fiord Resolute P o n d In le t A rc tic B a y Nanisivik Clyde River Q ikiqtarjuaq Ig lo o lik Cambridge Bay Taloyoak Hall Beach Pangnirtung Kugluktuk Pelly Bay Um ingmaktok Gjoa Haven B a th u rs t In le t Repulse Bay Iq a lu it Cape Coral Harbour Dorset Baker Lake Kimmirut Chesterfield Inlet R a n k in In le t W hale Cove Arviat Sanikiluaq 5 Airports for Nunavummiut and Their Economy—An Investment Strategy for Nunavut Sovereignty Sovereignty over an area is generally provided by the presence of a governance structure for people within the area, support infra- structure and typically some form of military presence or capability. Where one or more of these elements are missing, sovereignty over an area may be compromised. In Canada’s North, the issue of sovereignty has been and will be an important issue for both federal and territorial governments. In the past, World War II and the Cold War provided the impetus for the funding and establishment of new communities, airports and other facilities. Iqaluit Airport for instance has been used by Canadian and U.S. military operations since 1943. More recently the air- port has served as a technical stop for Canadian and American military aircraft enroute to DEW line sites and military bases further north, such as Thule and Alert, as well as NATO aircraft operating on North Atlantic and polar routes. The issue of sovereignty in the North in current times is largely focused on the possible greater use of the Northwest Passage by commercial shipping due to global warming and the availability of Search and Rescue services in the High Arctic that could be re- quired for new polar flights. The increasing development of northern resources such as diamonds, oil and gas adds to the impor- tance of this issue. Although the federal government has been demonstrating Canada’s sovereignty through continued scientific activities such as map- ping, climate monitoring and archaeological exploration, additional key components of sovereignty offered by improved airport infra- structure have not been added. Access and Equity Airports provide access for Nunavummiut and communities to the rest of Nunavut and Canada. Where current airport infrastructure or situate places restrictions on the type of aircraft, payload or schedule reliability, this effectively means some Nunavummiut or communities do not enjoy the same access to or equity using the air transportation system as other Nunavummiut. Airport improve- ments that minimize access and equity issues will help realize the objectives of the Bathurst Mandate. The issue of access and eq- uity is particularly important for (emergency) medevac and medical travel needs. With regards specifically to medevacs, Transport Canada estimates that in 1999 30,000 patients were moved by air ambulance in Canada. Of these, 10% or 3,000 trips were in Nun- avut. Polar and High Latitude Overflights The recent introduction of new Polar Routes, the continued growth of traffic using high latitude routes over the North Atlantic, and the changing nature of world aircraft fleets, present immediate economic development opportunities for Nunavut through an expanded role for Iqaluit Airport. 6 Airports for Nunavummiut and Their Economy—An Investment Strategy for Nunavut Based on a 2001 Aeronautical Market Study done for the Government of Nunavut 3,220 flights per year could potentially use polar routes near Iqaluit and over 2,000 flights per day could potentially use high latitude and North Atlantic routes near Iqaluit. Iqaluit Airport has traditionally served as a technical stop for aircraft crossing the North Atlantic. It continues this role today by re- ceiving wide-body traffic every week for technical or emergency medical reasons. During 2001, a number of the world’s largest in- ternational airlines expressed interest in potentially using Iqaluit as either a new alternate airport or as a technical stop due to its northerly geographic location and technical capability. The impact of an expanded role for Iqaluit on local companies would be significant. Increased investment and employment would occur in most airport businesses and aviation related activities now servicing Iqaluit.
Recommended publications
  • AMATII Proceedings
    PROCEEDINGS: Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Response Capacity and Sustainable Development 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group By Institute of the North, Anchorage, Alaska, USA 20 DECEMBER 2012 SARA FRENCH, WALTER AND DUNCAN GORDON FOUNDATION FRENCH, WALTER SARA ICELANDIC COAST GUARD INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH SARA FRENCH, WALTER AND DUNCAN GORDON FOUNDATION Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments .........................................................................6 Abbreviations and Acronyms ..........................................................7 Executive Summary .......................................................................8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 30 June 02, 2021 Cambridge Bay New Power Plant Project Nunavut Planning Commission ______Is Not a Viable Option
    Cambridge Bay New Power Plant Project Nunavut Planning Commission ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Introduction Qulliq Energy Corporation (QEC) is proposing to construct and operate a new power plant in the Hamlet of Cambridge Bay located in the Kitikmeot Region of Nunavut (the Project). This will be a multi-year Project that will include the installation of a 90,000-liter capacity horizontal fuel tank and two 2 million-liter capacity vertical fuel tanks and the new power plant will use more fuel-efficient engines. The plant will generate less noise and exhaust gases, due to the availability of equipment like industrial scrubbers and hospital grade silencers which will substantially reduce sound and air pollution. The new plant will have a life cycle of over 40 years and will be capable of integrating renewable energy sources. Proponent Information Qulliq Energy Corporation (QEC) is a Government of Nunavut (GN) territorial corporation. Through the operation of 25 stand-alone diesel power plants with a total installed capacity of approximately 76,000 kilowatts, QEC is the sole provider of electricity to approximately 15,000 customers in the territory. QEC provides mechanical, electrical, and line maintenance services from three regional centers: Iqaluit, Rankin Inlet and Cambridge Bay. QECs administrative activities are carried out at the Head Office in Baker Lake and the Corporate Office in Iqaluit. QEC is committed to planning and developing cost effective and efficient ways to provide a safe, reliable and stable energy supply for all Nunavummiut. Project Background Cambridge Bay is a community with increasing demand for electricity, reflecting its growing population and increasing government and commercial enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary: the Northern
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT Executive Summary January 2011 PROLOG CANADA INC. PAGE 1 NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT Disclaimer This report reflects the views of PROLOG Canada Inc. only and does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of Transport Canada. Neither Transport Canada, nor its employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this report, or process described herein, and assumes no responsibility for anyone’s use of the information. Transport Canada is not responsible for errors or omissions in this report and makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Transport Canada does not endorse products or companies. Reference in this report to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by Transport Canada and shall not be used for advertising or service endorsement purposes. Trade or company names appear in this report only because they are essential to the objectives of the report. PAGE 2 PROLOG CANADA INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT Executive Summary Prepared for Transport Canada Prepared by PROLOG Canada Inc. In Association with EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd. January 2011 PROLOG CANADA INC. PAGE 3 NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT PAGE 4 PROLOG CANADA INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Northern Transportation Systems Assessment Executive Summary 1. Introduction The purpose of the Northern Transportation Systems Assessment is to determine what transportation infrastructure is required to support growing demand in the North over the next 20 years; and to determine what incremental improvements will build towards a transportation system that supports Canada’s vision for northern development.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report: October 1, 2014 Assessing the Impact of Small, Canadian Arctic River Flows to the Freshwater Budget of the Canadian Archipelago Matthew B
    Annual Report: October 1, 2014 Assessing the impact of small, Canadian Arctic River flows to the freshwater budget of the Canadian Archipelago Matthew B. Alkire, University of Washington Assessing the impact of small, Canadian Arctic river flows to the freshwater budget of the Canadian Archipelago (or SCARFs) is a scientific research project funded by the National Science Foundation (USA). The purpose of this project is to collect water samples from seven different rivers and their adjoining estuaries throughout the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (see Fig. 1) in order to determine whether or not their chemical signatures differ from larger North American rivers such as the Mackenzie and Yukon Rivers. Five of the rivers are located within Nunavut, Canada: the Coppermine River (near Kugluktuk), Ellice River (~140 km southeast of Cambridge Bay), Back River (~180 km southeast of Gjoa Haven), Cunningham River (~77 km southeast of Resolute Bay on Somerset Island), and Kangiqtugaapik River (near Clyde River, Baffin Island). Two of the rivers are located within the Northwest Territories, Canada: the Kujjuua River (located approximately 67 km northeast of Ulukhaktok on Victoria Island) and Thomsen River (specifically near the mouth of the river where it empties into Castel Bay, on Banks Island). Figure 1. Map of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The red stars indicate the mouths of the rivers sampled during this study: (1) Coppermine R., (2) Ellice R., (3) Back R., (4) Kuujuua R. (Victoria Island), (5) Thomsen R. (Banks Island), (6) Cunningham R. (Somerset Island), and (7) Clyde R. (Baffin Island). The Coppermine, Ellice, and Back Rivers are located on the mainland of Nunavut.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Investigation Report A00h0005 Runway Excursion First Air Boeing 727-200 C-Gxfa Iqaluit Airport, Nunavut 22 September 2
    AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A00H0005 RUNWAY EXCURSION FIRST AIR BOEING 727-200 C-GXFA IQALUIT AIRPORT, NUNAVUT 22 SEPTEMBER 2000 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Aviation Investigation Report Runway Excursion First Air Boeing 727-200 C-GXFA Iqaluit Airport, Nunavut 22 September 2000 Report Number A00H0005 Summary The Boeing 727, C-GXFA, operating as First Air Flight 860, was on a scheduled flight from Ottawa, Ontario, to Iqaluit, Nunavut, with 7 crew members and 52 passengers on board. Iqaluit Airport was receiving its first major snow squall of the winter, and snow-clearing operations were under way. The wind was from the east at approximately 20 knots with gusts to 30 knots. The snow-clearing vehicles left the runway and remained clear while the flight was conducting an instrument approach to Runway 35. Because of strong winds, the approach was discontinued approximately five nautical miles from the airport, and a second approach to Runway 35 was carried out. After touching down near the runway centreline, the aircraft travelled off the left side of the runway, then returned to the runway surface. The aircraft then drifted to the left and came to rest 7000 feet from the threshold of Runway 35. The nose wheels and the left main wheels were off the runway in the mud west of the runway. An emergency evacuation was ordered, and all passengers and crew exited the aircraft without injury.
    [Show full text]
  • (STAR) Data Report
    Storm Studies in the Arctic (STAR) Data Report Shannon Fargey1, John Hanesiak1, George Liu1, Ronald Stewart1, Klaus Hochheim1, Mark Gordon2, Peter Taylor2, William Henson3, Alex LaPlante3, Gordon McBean4, Walter Strapp5, Zlatko Vukovic5, Mengistu Wolde 6 1Centre for Earth Observation Science (CEOS), Department of Environment and Geography, University of Manitoba 2Centre for Research in Earth and Space Science, York University 3Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Dept., McGill University 4Geography Department, University of Western Ontario 5Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, Environment Canada 6Convair Facility Flight Research Laboratory Institute for Aerospace Research National, Research Council Canada Centre for Earth Observation Science (CEOS) University of Manitoba March 2011 Table of Contents i. STAR Data Access Policy................................................................................................. v i.i. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................v i.ii. REQUESTS FROM STAR INVESTIGATORS........................................................................v i.ii.i. Special STAR Datasets .....................................................................................................................v i.ii.ii. Operational Datasets [MSC Climate Datasets]....................................................................vi i.iii. REQUESTS FROM NON­PARTICIPANTS .........................................................................vi
    [Show full text]
  • NWT/NU Spills Working Agreement
    NORTHWEST TERRITORIES–NUNAVUT SPILLS WORKING AGREEMENT Updated October 2014 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Content Page Cover Front Cover 1 Cover Inside Front Cover 2 Introductory Table of Contents 3 Introductory Record of Amendments 3 1. Introduction/Purpose/Goals 4 2. Parties to the Agreement 5 3. Letter of Agreement 6 - Background 6 - Lead Agency Designation and Contact 6 - Lead Agency Responsibilities 6 - General 7 4. Signatures of Parties to the Agreement 8 5. Glossary of Terms 9 Table 1A Lead Agency Designation for Spills in the NT and NU 10 Table 1B Lead Agency Designation for NT Airport Spills 14 Table 1C Lead Agency Designation for NU Airport Spills 14 Table 1D Territorial Roads and Highways in the NT 15 Table 1E Territorial Roads in NU 15 Table 2 General Guidelines for Assessing Spill Significance and Spill File Closure 16 Table 3 Spill Line Contract and Operation 17 Appendix A Schedule 1 - Reportable Quantities for NT-NU Spills 18 Appendix B Spill Line Report Form 20 Appendix C Instructions for Completing the NT/NU Spill Report Form 21 Appendix D Environmental Emergencies Science Table (Science Table) 22 RECORD OF AMENDMENTS * No. Amendment Description Entered By / Date Approved By / Date 1 GNWT spills response structure changed on April 1. 2014 to reflect the changes of devolution. Departments of Industry Tourism and Investment and Lands were added to the NT/NU SWA 2 Environment Canada nationally restructured their spill response structure in 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 * Starting in 2015, the NT/NU SWA will be reviewed and updated annually during the Fall NT/NU Spills Working Group meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Canada May 17, 2016
    Transport Canada May 17, 2016 TRANSPORT CANADA PIEVC CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT CAMBRIDGE BAY AIRPORT FINAL PROJECT NO.: 0727-004 DATE: May 17, 2016 DOCUMENT NO.: 0727004-16-03 Suite 500 - 980 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Telephone (604) 684-5900 Fax (604) 684-5909 May 17, 2016 Project No.: 0727004 Janice Festa, Senior Policy Advisor Transport Canada 330 Sparks Street Ottawa, ON, K1A 0N5 Dear Mrs. Festa, Re: PIEVC Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Cambridge Bay Airport - FINAL Please find attached the final version of our above-referenced report. Thank you for the opportunity to work on this assessment. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Lukas Arenson, Dr.Sc.Techn.ETH, P.Eng. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Transport Canada, PIEVC Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment May 17, 2016 Cambridge Bay Airport – FINAL Project No.: 0727-004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BGC Engineering Inc. (BGC) was commissioned by Transport Canada (TC) in partnership with the Government of Nunavut Territories and with Engineers Canada to apply the vulnerability assessment protocol to the Cambridge Bay Airport. The assessment follows a standardized protocol prepared by the Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee (PIEVC). The airport is located on Victoria Island, Nunavut, approximately 2.6 km west of the hamlet of Cambridge Bay, and is owned by the Government of Nunavut. It was constructed in the 1950s and is the only airport in Canada where jet aircraft land on a gravel runway. Runway 13-31T is 5000 ft long, currently extended to 6000 ft. In 2015, about 4,600 aircraft movements were recorded, of which 11% were jet aircraft movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 1 Community Priorities Infrastructure for a Sustainable Rankin Inlet
    VVooll.. 11 CCoommmmuunniittyy PPrriioorriittiieess IInnffrraassttrruuccttuurree ffoorr aa SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee RRaannkkiinn IInnlleett Prepared for the Government of Nunavut by Aarluk Consulting Inc. Approved by the Hamlet Council of Rankin Inlet September 2010 Aarluk Consulting Inc. Rankin Inlet Integrated Community Infrastructure Sustainability Plan Vol. 1 – September 28, 2010 2 Infrastructure for a Sustainable Rankin Inlet Volume One: Community Priorities A report prepared for the Government of Nunavut by Aarluk Consulting Inc. Submitted to the Hamlet of Rankin Inlet – Approval Pending Submitted to the Government of Nunavut, Department of Community and Government Services Aarluk Consulting Inc. Rankin Inlet Integrated Community Infrastructure Sustainability Plan Vol. 1 – September 28, 2010 3 Acknowledgements Through the fall of 2009 and winter of 2010, twenty-three Nunavut communities prepared Integrated Community Infrastructure Sustainability Plans (ICISPs). ICISPs will help communities identify and achieve goals for environmental, cultural, social and economic sustainability. The result of the process will be an infrastructure plan for each community that is long- term, reflects community goals and priorities, meets the needs and interests of all residents and groups, and is based on sustainability principles and goals. In the short- term, these plans will provide a useful and practical framework for identifying and justifying future infrastructure projects. More broadly, these plans represent a first step in the broader process of creating a long-term, comprehensive sustainability plan for each Nunavut community. The development of the ICISPs was coordinated by the Nunavut Community Infrastructure Advisory Committee (NCIAC) and the Government of Nunavut’s Department of Community and Government Services (CGS). Funding for the development of the ICISPs was provided under the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) of the Government of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Surveillance Civilian Commercial Aerial Surveillance Options for the Arctic
    Arctic Surveillance Civilian Commercial Aerial Surveillance Options for the Arctic Dan Brookes DRDC Ottawa Derek F. Scott VP Airborne Maritime Surveillance Division Provincial Aerospace Ltd (PAL) Pip Rudkin UAV Operations Manager PAL Airborne Maritime Surveillance Division Provincial Aerospace Ltd Defence R&D Canada – Ottawa Technical Report DRDC Ottawa TR 2013-142 November 2013 Arctic Surveillance Civilian Commercial Aerial Surveillance Options for the Arctic Dan Brookes DRDC Ottawa Derek F. Scott VP Airborne Maritime Surveillance Division Provincial Aerospace Ltd (PAL) Pip Rudkin UAV Operations Manager PAL Airborne Maritime Surveillance Division Provincial Aerospace Ltd Defence R&D Canada – Ottawa Technical Report DRDC Ottawa TR 2013-142 November 2013 Principal Author Original signed by Dan Brookes Dan Brookes Defence Scienist Approved by Original signed by Caroline Wilcox Caroline Wilcox Head, Space and ISR Applications Section Approved for release by Original signed by Chris McMillan Chris McMillan Chair, Document Review Panel This work was originally sponsored by ARP project 11HI01-Options for Northern Surveillance, and completed under the Northern Watch TDP project 15EJ01 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2013 © Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2013 Preface This report grew out of a study that was originally commissioned by DRDC with Provincial Aerospace Ltd (PAL) in early 2007. With the assistance of PAL’s experience and expertise, the aim was to explore the feasibility, logistics and costs of providing surveillance and reconnaissance (SR) capabilities in the Arctic using private commercial sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Review of the Yellowknife Airport
    Final Technical Report GOVERNANCE REVIEW OF THE YELLOWKNIFE AIRPORT September 2015 The Lindbergh Group Inc. Yellowknife Airport Governance Review SC446825 i Yellowknife Airport Governance Review SC446825 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Engagement Objectives ........................................................................................................ 1 1.3. Engagement Scope .................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. Overall Approach and Methodology ................................................................................ 3 1.5. Key Issues and Considerations .......................................................................................... 4 2. EVOLVING PRACTICES IN AIRPORT GOVERNANCE IN CANADA AND AROUND THE WORLD ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Overview of Privatization ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aqhaliat-2018-EN-Full-Report.Pdf
    POLAR KNOWLEDGE Aqhaliat Table of Contents ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE .....................................................................................................1 Lichens in High Arctic ecosystems: Recommended research directions for assessing diversity and function near the Canadian High Arctic Research Station, Cambridge Bay, Nunavut ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Vascular synphenology of plant communities around Cambridge Bay, Victoria Island, Nunavut, during the growing season of 2015 .............................................................................. 9 The distribution and abundance of parasites in harvested wildlife from the Canadian North: A review .......................................................................................................................... 20 Fire in the Arctic: The effect of wildfire across diverse aquatic ecosystems of the Northwest Territories ................................................................................................................. 31 Arctic marine ecology benchmarking program: Monitoring biodiversity using scuba ............... 39 For more information about Polar Knowledge Canada, or for additional copies of this report, contact: Stratification in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago’s Kitikmeot Sea: Biological and geochemical consequences ........................................................................................................ 46 Polar Knowledge
    [Show full text]