DOCSLIB.ORG

LS.T.V^Al&U.L Q.Va.&Jlsslk I.La .E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF LONDON See over for Abstract of Thesis notes on completion Author (full names) .....V^.VrN.Uk.kr. ........................................................................................... Title of thesis ....... ................................................ ........................................................................ LS.T.v^Al&U.L Q.vA.&JLSsLk I.lA.e. L.4.7.fc £ £ f e i S ? .0................ Degree......................................................... This dissertation deals with madrasa education in Istanbul during the late Ottoman period. It mainly focuses on the period between 1839 when the Tanzimat was promulgated and 1908 when the Young Turk Revolution took place. The subject has usually been neglected by the existing literature and treated within the general assumptions relying on dichotomous and simplistic analyses. This study aims to demonstrate that the history of Istanbul madrasas is more complex than the existing literature has suggested, primarily using the archival documents from the Prime Ministerial Ottoman ArchivesBa$bcikanhk (. Osmanh Ar§ivleri) as well as the §eyhulislamate Archives(Me§ihat Ar§ivi) in Istanbul, memoirs and biographical works. The subject has been dealt with in two main parts. Each part is composed of two chapters. In the first part, madrasa teachers are the focal point of analysis. The first chapter examines the professional, institutional and intellectual aspects of madrasa teachers. In the second chapter, the social, cultural and educational composition of Istanbul dersiams has been explored statistically through the information extracted from their personnel files. The third chapter attempts to draw a comprehensive picture of madrasa students in the period in Istanbul. Taking into account their educational activities as well as career patterns in non­ religious fields, it is also aimed to demonstrate their responses/re actions to shifting circumstances that occurred as a result of the reforms and some other factors such as international relations in the period. The last chapter mainly concentrates on the state perception of madrasa education and thus the relationship between the rise of modern state apparatus and madrasa education chiefly through disciplinary cases and imperial integration policies. ProQuest Number: 10731388 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731388 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Bound By Biissett Bookbinders 020 8992 3965 www.blissetts.com T e a c h in g a n d L e a r n in g IN THE MADRASAS OF ISTANBUL DURING THE LATE OTTOMAN PERIOD BY H a l il Ib r a h im E r b a y A D issertation S ubm itted f o r t h e d e g r e e o f D o c t o r o f P h il o s o p h y in H istory in S c h o o l o f O riental a n d A frica n S t u d ie s , U niversity o f Lo n d o n 2009 DECLARATION This dissertation is the result of my own investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Halil Ibrahim ERBAY A b s t r a c t This dissertation deals with madrasa education in Istanbul during the late Ottoman period. It mainly focuses on the period between 1839 when the Tanzimat was promulgated and 1908 when the Young Turk Revolution took place. The subject has usually been neglected by the existing literature and treated within the general assumptions relying on dichotomous and simplistic analyses. This study aims to demonstrate that the history of Istanbul madrasas is more complex than the existing literature has suggested, primarily using the archival documents from the Prime Ministerial Ottoman Archives (Basbalmnlik Osmanli Arsivleri ) as well as the Seyhulislamate Archives (.Mesihat Arsivi) in Istanbul, memoirs and biographical works. The subject has been dealt with in two main parts. Each part is composed of two chapters. In the first part, madrasa teachers are the focal point of analysis. The first chapter examines the professional, institutional and intellectual aspects of madrasa teachers. In the second chapter, the social, cultural and educational composition of Istanbul dersiams has been explored statistically through the information extracted from their personnel files. The third chapter attempts to draw a comprehensive picture of madrasa students in the period in Istanbul. Taking into account their educational activities as well as career patterns in non-religious fields, it is also aimed to demonstrate their responses/reactions to shifting circumstances that occurred as a result of the reforms and some other factors such as international relations in the period. The last chapter mainly concentrates on the state perception of madrasa education and thus the relationship between the rise of modem state apparatus and madrasa education chiefly through disciplinary cases and imperial integration policies. A cknowledgements The completion of this dissertation owes so much to a number of people and institutions. Without their encouragement, help and material support, it would have not been possible. It is a pleasure to acknowledge their generous efforts and I wish to thank all of them. First and foremost, my thanks go to my supervisor Benjamin C. Fortna. Throughout the long period of my work, Ben has always been more than a supervisor and afforded generous moral support and friendship as well as intellectual guidance. His incredibly positive approach and manner created the most suitable environment for me to study at SO AS. The financial suppoit of the Ministry of Education of Turkey made this project possible. I am so grateful to its staff in Ankara that has always been helpful during my study in Britain and during my research in Istanbul. I made my journey in pursuit of knowledge in Britain with two special persons: my cousin Mahmut Erbay, and my close friend Ali Goksu. They have always been great sources of inspiration over the years. Their friendship has always been - and still is - invaluable. I also wish to thank another close friend and colleague, Ismail Hacinebioglu with whom I shared many things during our stay in Britain. I would like to thank my old friends Murat Berk and A.Kerim Asilsoy. Both of them often sacrificed their time for helping me in my struggle with the documents in the archives in Istanbul. Murat and his wife Derya also deserve special thanks for their warm hospitality during my stay in New York. Ilyas Ozmay was always supportive when I needed him. I would also like to thank another close friend Omer Gundogdu, who is a man of wisdom. I particularly owe thanks to my cousin Sevgi and her husband Michael, both of whom did their best for me since I arrived in London. In London, many friends provided an excellent atmosphere in which I could study. I thank Hiiseyin Aslan for his unfailing energy and sense of humour. I can 4 never forget the hospitality of Necmi Ak?ay and his wife in Finsbury Park. Their home has been my place for Turkish tea, cookies and Turkish TV channels during most weekends for years. Among many others, I also would like to thank Turalay Ken9, Mesut Aydin, Mehmet and Filiz Karaca, Nurullah Cretin, Munir Yildirim, Ibrahim Giineri, Bekir Kavut, Bilal Savas, Michelangelo Guida, Sedat Ladner, Ihsan Bal, Omer Tiirker and Nilanjan Sarkar. I also would like to take this opportunity to commemorate two great young friends who passed away during my stay in London: Meliha and Ridvan. I will always cherish my memories of them! During my study, I had the chance to make friends in the field of Ottoman history. Since I first met him in the Muftiiluk Archives years ago, Jun Akiba has always been a close friend and a colleague. I am indebted to him for providing me with many sources, and reading the earlier draft of this dissertation. Jun also organized a workshop in Tokyo in which I found the opportunity to present an earlier version of Chapter 2 and to share my findings with the Japanese Ottomanists. I also wish to thank Bilgin Aydin who encouraged me to enter the world of Ottoman ulama with his excellent expertise on the Muftiiluk Archives. I am grateful to Yonca Koksal and Figen Taskin. I greatly enjoyed their company and benefited from our conversations during my research in Istanbul. I would like to thank the staffs of several libraries and archives for being extremely helpful during my research: Basbakanlik Osmanli Arsivleri (Istanbul), Istanbul Muftiilugu Mesihat Arsivi, SO AS Library (London) and ISAM Library (Istanbul). I am also grateful to my colleagues in my new institution, Harran University, particularly Ibrahim Hakki Inal, Rifat Atay, Adnan Demircan and Salih Aydemir for their constant support during my writing stage. I am indebted to my editors, Gina Spiezia and Clyde Forsberg, for their efforts which saved me many errors. All of the members of my extended family have always been generous in their constant moral and material support. I am extraordinarily indebted to my brothers O.Faruk and A.Hamit, my sisters-in-law Fatma and Atiye and my uncle Celal Erbay for their continuous support. My nephews Asim and Hakan, and nieces Elif and Serra were my source of joy. I particularly wish to thank my parents, Ummuhan and Huseyin Erbay who are the first who taught me to learn.
Recommended publications
  • Cihannüma TARİH VE COĞRAFYA ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL of HISTORY and GEOGRAPHY STUDIES

    Cihannüma TARİH VE COĞRAFYA ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL of HISTORY and GEOGRAPHY STUDIES

    Cihannüma TARİH VE COĞRAFYA ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL OF HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY STUDIES CİLT / VOLUME VII SAYI / ISSUE 1 Temmuz / July 2021 İZMİR KÂTİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL VE BEŞERİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ Cihannüma TARİH VE COĞRAFYA ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL OF HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY STUDIES P-ISSN: 2149-0678 / E-ISSN: 2148-8843 Sahibi/Owner İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Fakültesi adına Prof.Dr. Turan GÖKÇE Editör / Editor Prof.Dr. Cahit TELCİ, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü / Responsible Editor Dr. Beycan HOCAOĞLU, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Yayın Kurulu / Editorial Board Doç.Dr. Yahya ARAZ, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Dr. Elisabetta BENIGNI, Universitá degli Studi di Torino Dr. Zaur GASIMOV, Orient Institut Istanbul Prof.Dr. Vehbi GÜNAY, Ege Üniversitesi Assoc.Prof. Barbara S. KINSEY, Universty of Central Florida Dr. İrfan KOKDAŞ, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Prof.Dr. Özer KÜPELİ, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Assoc.Prof. Kent F. SCHULL, Binghamton University Assoc.Prof. Nabil Al-TIKRITI, University of Mary Washington Doç.Dr. Haydar YALÇIN, Ege Üniversitesi Yayın Türü / Publication Type Hakemli Süreli Yayın / Peer-reviewed Periodicals Yazışma Adresi / CorrespondingAddress İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Fakültesi, Balatçık-Çiğli/İzmir Tel: +90(232) 329 35 35-8508 Faks: +90(232) 329 35 19 e-posta: [email protected] Web: http://dergipark.gov.tr/cihannuma Basımevi / Publishing House Meta Basım Matbaacılık Hizmetleri 87 sk. No:4/A Bornova/İzmir
  • Historia Scribere 13 (2021)

    Historia Scribere 13 (2021)

    historia scribere 13 (2021) The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments Vera Flatz Kerngebiet: Neuzeit eingereicht bei: Yasir Yilmaz, MA PhD und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Ehrenpreis eingereicht im: WiSe 2019/20 Rubrik: Seminar-Arbeit Abstract The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments The following seminar paper deals with Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and the processes that turned an Ottoman principality into the Ottoman Empire. Starting with Sultan Mehmed’s II appointment in 1444, important practic- es such as the nomination of a grand vizier changed significantly. Moreover, Mehmed II built a new palace which reflected the new imperial self-percep- tion, a new code of law was installed, and the empire was centralised. All these developments become especially visible in the life of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha Angelovic. The paper examines secondary literature as well as contem- porary sources of Kritobolous and Ibn Khaldun. Sources on Mahmud Pasha’s life are rare and need to be analysed with caution as his posthumous legend influenced the production of literature about his life. 1. Introduction Mahmud Pasha Angelovic, born at the beginning of the 15th century in a town in Ser- bia, became one of the most influential grand viziers of the Ottoman Empire. How did that happen? In 1453, Mehmed II conquered Constantinople and made it the capital of one of the biggest empires of the early modern period.
  • 3 March 1924 Tevhid Tedrisat Law and Requirements

    3 March 1924 Tevhid Tedrisat Law and Requirements

    3 MARCH 1924 TEVHID TEDRISAT LAW AND REQUIREMENTS Assoc. Prof. Dr. Özkan Akman Gaziantep University Prof. Dr. Ali Meydan Nevşehir Hacı Bektaşi Veli University Introduction Education and training activities in the Islamic society began with Muhammad’s prophethood, shaped, variegated and has continued until today. God, the Prophet. Muhammad download it in the first verse “read the name of the Lord the Creator! God Man ‘was created out of relevance. Read! Your Lord is the most generous. Allah is taught to write with a pen, do not know who has taught the people (Yazır, 2015; 95:6). “has reported that the Prophet himself in the eyes of God reveals that knowledge of the source and has commanded all believers to read. When the Islamic State began to expand and the Muslim community began to crowded, the education began to spread out of the mosques (Atay, 1983). Due to the increase in the Muslim population, the main purpose of the mosques was to prevent the worship to be done comfortably by the crowded student groups, the emergence of new branches of science (Kırpık, 2012) and the payment of wages to the teachers (Zengin, 2002). These training activities, which can be called informal and non-formal education which has a certain space, hierarchy, curricula and continuity, which are made specific to certain areas, have assumed important functions in Islamic society during the process which will continue until the establishment of madrasahs which are organized for this purpose and which are organized for this purpose (Tangulu, Karadeniz and Ateş, 2014; Zengin, 2002). Although it is accepted that a new era started in education with the establishment of madrasahs, Pedersen says that the madrasas do not differ much from the mosques, and that the same educational activities were continued (Pedersen, 1979).
  • By Aijaz Ahmed

    By Aijaz Ahmed

    THESIS ISLAM IN MODERN TURKEY (1938-82) flBSTRflCT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF MLOSOPHY IN ISLAMIC STUDIES BY AIJAZ AHMED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. SAYYIDAHSAN READER DEPARTMiNT OF ISLAMIC STTUDISS ALI6ARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 20Di STff^o % ABSTRACT In tenth century, the Turks of central Asia had converted to Islam and by the eleventh century they began to push their way into South-Eastern Russia and Persia. The Ottoman State emerged consequent to an Islamic movement under Ghazi Osman (1299-1326), founder of the dynasty, at Eskisehir, in North- Eastern Anatolia. Sufis, Ulema and Ghazis of Anatolia played an important role in this movement. For six centuries the Ottomans were almost constantly at war with Christian Europe and had succeeded in imposing the Islamic rule over a large part of Europe. The later Sultans could not maintain it strictly. With the expansion of the Ottoman dominions the rulers became more autocratic with the sole aim of conquering alien land. To achieve this the rulers granted freedom and cultural autonomy to his non-Muslim subjects and allowed the major religious groups to establish self governing communities under the leadership of their own religious chiefs. The recent work is spread over two parts containing eight chapters with a brief introduction and my own conclusions. Each part has four chapters. Part I, chapters I to IV, deals with the political mobilization of the Turkish peasants from the beginning of the modernization period and to the war of Independence as well as the initial stages of the transition to comparative politics.
  • The Place of the Young Turk Revolution in Turkish History

    The Place of the Young Turk Revolution in Turkish History

    THE PLACE OF THE YOUNG TURK REVOLUTION IN TURKISH HISTORY. Prof. Dr. sı.. AKŞİN •• i. Introduciioa J'be Turu in History: The Turks of Turkeyarepan of the Tuılcic.pcoples who. back in history. were once concentrated in Central Asia. Central Asia can be roughly described as the region to the north and the north-west nf the China Wall. The China Wall was built to koopthe namadie peoples -ineloding the Tuikic peoples- out of China. The Wall also roughly corresponded to the frontler of feıtile iand wbere agriculture could be practised. In Centtal Asia the tand was generally not suitable for qriculıure. but could sustain the animal hents of the nomads. The fmt "state" of the Turlcicpeoples was the Empiıe of the Hmıs. for which the apprOximate dates 220 BC-216 AD are given. But whether or not this formatian can be considered a state or empire in the proper sense of the word is not clear. because the Hmıs did not use the written word. Probably this fonnatian was a coofederation of tribes. raiher' than a state. The same can probobly he said for the Göktürks (552-745). though at the end of their primacy they hegan to use writing. The third important poIitical formation of the Turkic peoples was the Uygur State (745-940). By the end of the 8th century. two important developments took place among the Turkic peoples. 1) A great number of them hegan to move west, Lo Transoxania and contiguous regions and 2) they began to . adopt Islam. It seems that the proces of Islamization was a rather loog.
  • İslam Tetkikleri Merkezi Dergisi

    İslam Tetkikleri Merkezi Dergisi

    Yakın Doğu Ünİversİtesİ İslam tetkİklerİ merkezİ Dergİsİ Journal of the near east unıversıtY ıslamıc research center Yıl 1, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, Güz 2015 Yakın Doğu Ünİversİtesİ İslam tetkİklerİ merkezİ Dergİsİ Journal of the near east unıversıtY ıslamıc research center ISSN: 2148-922X Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Adına Sahibi Owner on Behalf of Near East University Dr. Suat İrfan GÜNSEL Onursal Editör Honorary Editor Prof. Dr. Ümit HASSAN (Rektör/President) Editörler Editors Prof. Dr. İbrahim ÇAPAK&Prof. Dr. Mehmet Mahfuz SöyLEMEz [email protected]; [email protected] Yayın Kurulu Editorial Board Prof. Dr. İbrahim ÇAPAK, Prof. Dr. Mehmet Mahfuz SöyLEMEz, Prof. Dr. Halil İbrahim BULUT, Prof. Dr. Ümit HASSAN, Danışma Kurulu Advisory Board Prof. Dr. Mümtaz ALİ (International Islamic University, MALEzyA) Prof. Dr. Mehmet Mahfuz SöyLEMEz (yakın Doğu Üniversitesi öğretim Üyesi, KKTC) Prof. Dr. Talip ATALAy (K.K.T.C. Din İşleri Başkanı, KKTC) Prof. Dr. Muhammed BABAAMMİ (Metodoloji Enstitüsü Müdürü, CEzAyİR) Prof. Dr. İsmail BARDHİ (Dean School of Islamic Theology of Skoplje, ABD) Prof. Dr. Şenol BEKTAŞ (yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Rektör yardımcısı, KKTC) Prof. Dr. İbrahim ÇAPAK (yakın Doğu Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dekanı, KKTC) Prof. Dr. İlyas ÇELEBİ (Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi, TÜRKİyE) Prof. Dr. Şinasi GÜNDÜz (Uluslararası Balkan Üniversitesi Rektörü, MAKEDONyA) Prof. Dr. Enis HURŞİT, (Refah Üniversitesi Rektörü, PAKİSTAN) Prof. Dr. Ali KARADAĞİ, (Katar Üniversitesi, KATAR) Prof. Dr. Raşit KÜÇÜK (Din İşleri yüksek Kurulu Başkanı, TÜRKİyE) Prof. Dr. Mehmet Emin özAFŞAR (T.C. Diyanet İşleri Başkan yardımcısı, TÜRKİyE) Prof. Dr. ömer özSOy ( Frankfurt Üniversitesi ALMANyA) Prof. Dr. Burhanettin TATAR (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi, TÜRKİyE) Prof. Dr. Hasan Kamil yILMAz (T.C.
  • Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E

    Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E

    “Douglas Streusand has contributed a masterful comparative analysis and an up-to- S date reinterpretation of the significance of the early modern Islamic empires. This T book makes profound scholarly insights readily accessible to undergraduate stu- R dents and will be useful in world history surveys as well as more advanced courses.” —Hope Benne, Salem State College E U “Streusand creatively reexamines the military and political history and structures of the SAN Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. He breaks down the process of transformation and makes their divergent outcomes comprehensible, not only to an audience of special- ists, but also to undergraduates and general readers. Appropriate for courses in world, early modern, or Middle Eastern history as well as the political sociology of empires.” D —Linda T. Darling, University of Arizona “Streusand is to be commended for navigating these hearty and substantial historiogra- phies to pull together an analytical textbook which will be both informative and thought provoking for the undergraduate university audience.” GUNPOWDER EMPIRES —Colin Mitchell, Dalhousie University Islamic Gunpowder Empires provides an illuminating history of Islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of Islam’s three greatest empires: the Otto- IS mans (centered in what is now Turkey), the Safavids (in modern Iran), and the Mughals (ruling the Indian subcontinent). Author Douglas Streusand explains the origins of the three empires; compares the ideological, institutional, military, and economic contributors to their success; and L analyzes the causes of their rise, expansion, and ultimate transformation and decline. Streusand depicts the three empires as a part of an integrated international system extending from the At- lantic to the Straits of Malacca, emphasizing both the connections and the conflicts within that AMIC system.
  • Before the Odalisque: Renaissance Representations of Elite Ottoman Women Heather Madar

    Before the Odalisque: Renaissance Representations of Elite Ottoman Women Heather Madar

    Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2011, vol. 6 Before the Odalisque: Renaissance Representations of Elite Ottoman Women Heather Madar he much-mythologized harem of the Ottoman sultans occupied a Tcentral place in European Orientalist thought for centuries.1 The harem, presented as an exotic world of forbidden sexuality inhabited by compliant yet sexually voracious women, appears in literature, art, and travel writing. While the most famous expressions of this harem fixa- tion date from later centuries,2 a focus on the harem as libidinous zone is demonstrably present in written sources from the sixteenth century. Yet an exploration of sixteenth-century European images turns up a surprising dearth of imagery in this vein. While Renaissance art lacks the languid odalisques or detailed views of the physical environment of the sultan’s harem familiar from later works, a series of largely overlooked representa- tions of elite Ottoman women do exist. Dating from the mid-sixteenth century, these images feature imagined portraits of sultanas — elite women such as Ottoman princesses, the sultan’s mother (valide sultan), or the sul- tan’s preferred concubine (haseki).3 Hurrem, the wife of sultan Süleyman, and his daughter Mihrimah appear most frequently in this genre. Yet strik- ing differences are immediately evident between their depiction and later, more familiar, views of the harem and harem women. The women shown in the Renaissance tradition were members of the sultan’s harem, yet they are not shown within a harem setting, nor do the images make reference to it. Although they are visually marked as Other, largely through the atten- tion given to their exotic dress, they are also presented as women who are of interest as individuals, possessing status and political significance.
  • Procedure in the Ottoman Court and the Duties of Kadis

    Procedure in the Ottoman Court and the Duties of Kadis

    PROCEDURE IN THE OTTOMAN COURT AND THE DUTIES OF KADIS BY ABDURRAHMAN ATÇIL THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS ANS SOCIAL SCIENCES OF BİLKENT UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ANKARA, SEPTEMBER 2002 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master in History Dr. Eugenia Kermeli Thesis supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master in History Dr. Oktay Özel Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master in History Dr. Mehmet Öz Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Kürşat Aydoğan Director ABSTRACT Kadıs were heads of civil administration in the Ottoman provinces. In addition to judicial duties, they carried out administrative duties. With the passage of time from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries, the importance of the kadıs serving in the proximity of the center gradually increased, and they undertook more responsibility in administration of justice and of other governmental duties. In this thesis, duties of kadıs were generally discussed, and their duties in court procedure were examined in detail in the light of court records and the Şeyhulislams’ fetvas of mainly seventeenth century.
  • Sempozyum Programını Indirmek Için Tıklayınız

    Sempozyum Programını Indirmek Için Tıklayınız

    SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİ MAHMUT KEFEVİ İSLAMİ İLİMLER UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ ULUSLARARASI GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE SİNOP’TA TÜRK-İSLAM KÜLTÜRÜ SEMPOZYUMU -BİLDİRİ ÖZETLERİ KİTABI- International Symposium on Turkish-Islamic Culture in Sinop from Past to Present -Book of Abstracts- 5-7 EKİM 2018 / SİNOP Sinop Üniversitesinin 21. Bilimsel Yayınıdır. ISBN 978-605-88024-6-9 ULUSLARARASI GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE SİNOP’TA TÜRK-İSLAM KÜLTÜRÜ SEMPOZYUMU BİLDİRİ ÖZETLERİ KİTABI International Symposium on Turkish-Islamic Culture in Sinop From Past to Present Book of Abstracts ISBN 978-605-88024-6-9 Sinop Üniversitesi Adına Sahibi Owner on behalf of Sinop University Prof. Dr. Nihat DALGIN RektörRector Editörler | Editors Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Cüneyd AYDIN Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Emrah DİNDİ Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Doğan FIRINCI Editör Yardımcıları | Editorial Assistants Arş. Gör. Muhammet KARAAĞAÇ Arş. Gör. İbrahim TOPRAK Uluslarası Geçmişten Günümüze Sinop’ta Türk-İslam Kültürü Sempozyumu Bildiri Özetleri Ki- tabı Sinop Üniversitesinin bilimsel bir yayınıdır. Kitapta yayımlanan yazıların her türlü içerik sorumluluğu yazara aittir. Yazılar, yayıncı kuruluşun izni olmadan kısmen veya tamamen bir başka yerde yayımlanamaz. İletişim | Communication Korucuk Köyü Trafo Mahallesi No: 36 57000 | SİNOP | TÜRKİYE Tel: +90 (368) 2715757-58-59-60 | Faks: +90 (368) 2715763 web: http://turkislamsemp.sinop.edu.tr/ Uluslararası Geçmişten Günümüze Sinop’ta Türk-İslam Kültürü Sempozyumu / 5-7 Ekim 2018 SEMPOZYUM DÜZENLEME KURULU ONURSAL BAŞKANI Prof. Dr. Nihat DALGIN Sinop Üniversitesi Rektörü SEMPOZYUM KURULLARI DÜZENLEME KURULU Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Cüneyd AYDIN Sinop Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Emrah DİNDİ Sinop Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Faruk ÖZDEMİR Sinop Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Fatih AMAN Sinop Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Hasan BARLAK Sinop Üniversitesi Dr.
  • Ottoman Land Laws

    Ottoman Land Laws

    THE OTTOMAN LAND LAWS WITH A COMMENTARY ON THE OTTOMAN LAND CODE OF 7th RAMADAN 1274 & i. IJ. R.'t^TUTE PRESIDENT OF THE LAND COURT - JERUSALEM. BARRISTER AT LAW OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE. LATE OF THE INDIAN CIVIL SERVICE. &23S4- =M=M> =**-• ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Ptd. at Brash Conv Praam. / This book is dedicated to my friend John Buchan. / PREFACE. This book is intended to furnish an explanation of the Law of Mine and other State lands in Palestine, Tor the benefit or English speaking judges and lawyers It is the only buok in English which deals with the development of this branch of Turkish Law in Palestine, and for this reason apologies, which may be needed lor its contents, are not needed for its existence. It gives the text of the Ottoman laws contained in Sir Stanley Fisher's "Land Laws" together with the Iraq translation of the Provisional Laws. This makes it a fairly complete book or reference up to the time or the Occupation. The numerous Orders-in-Council and Ordinances, which have been passed since thai daLe, are collected in the two volumes ol "The Legislation or Pales­ tine" compiled by Mr. Norman Bentwich MC, which is adequately indexed. Their inclusion in tins \olume would, Lhererore. serve no useful purpose The commentary is confined to the Ottoman Land Code, ihough of course the notes contain frequent references to subsequent legislation. It differs lrom the ordinary legal text book in that it does not contain references to decided cases. 7 his is due to the fact that, in the absence of an adequate system of law reporting, it is impossible to ascertain either, what decisions have been passed, or what decisions are operative on any given point.
  • Ġstanbul Teknġk Ünġversġtesġ Sosyal

    Ġstanbul Teknġk Ünġversġtesġ Sosyal

    ĠSTANBUL TEKNĠK ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ SOSYAL BĠLĠMLER ENSTĠTÜSÜ NEDÎM’ĠN ġĠĠRLERĠNDE MĠMARĠ ESERLERE GÖNDERMELER YÜKSEK LĠSANS TEZĠ ġükran ÖZEL Anabilim Dalı: Sanat Tarihi Programı: Sanat Tarihi KASIM 2010 ĠSTANBUL TEKNĠK ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ SOSYAL BĠLĠMLER ENSTĠTÜSÜ NEDÎM’ĠN ġĠĠRLERĠNDE MĠMARĠ ESERLERE GÖNDERMELER YÜKSEK LĠSANS TEZĠ ġÜKRAN ÖZEL (402021006) Tezin Enstitüye Verildiği Tarih : 11 Eylül 2010 Tezin Savunulduğu Tarih : 1 Kasım 2010 Tez DanıĢmanı: Doç. Dr. Aygül AĞIR (ĠTÜ) Diğer Jüri Üyeleri: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Nezihe SEYHAN (BÜ) Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tarkan OKÇUOĞLU(ĠÜ) KASIM 2010 ÖNSÖZ 18. yüzyılın başında en olgun dönemini yaşayan Nedîm, Divan şiirinin en usta isimlerinden biridir. Bu ustalığı, özellikle onun yaşadığı dönemle bütünleşen bir şair olmasından gelir. Nedîm, Divan‟ında pek çok mimari tasvir yapar, bir beyitinde kendini hünerli bir mimara benzetir. O, mimarinin yaratıcı kudretine hayrandır. Bu sebeple yazdığı pek çok şiirde döneminin yapılarıyla ilgili ayrıntıları görebiliriz. Devrinin diğer şairleri gibi onun da Divanı‟nda pek çok târîh vardır. Nedîm‟in mimari tasvirleriyle daha çok onun târîhlerinde karşılaşırız. Nedîm târîhlerini, Lâle Devri‟nin ünlü kasırlarının yanında devrin çeşme, sebil vb. imar faaliyetleri için yazmıştır. Ayrıca Damat İbrahim Paşa‟nın Nevşehir‟de yaptırdığı cami, medrese, han ve çeşmeler için de târîh yazmıştır. Nedîm târîhlerinde çok defa hakkında târîh düşürdüğü olayı anlatır. İnşasının tamamlanması üzerine târîh yazdığı yapının niçin ve nasıl yapıldığı hakkında bilgi verir. Nedîm‟in târîhleri devrini aydınlatması bakımından önemlidir. Bu tez çalışmasında Nedîm‟in özellikle târîhlerindeki mimari tasvirler tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca Nedîm‟in dört kasidesindeki ve Şevk-âbâd hakkında yazdığı nazmındaki mimari tasvirler üzerinde çalışılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Lâle Devri‟nin ruhunu günümüze taşıyan Nedîm‟in, devrinde inşa edilen mimari eserleri algılama ve bunu şiirlerine yansıtma tarzını irdelemektir.